Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Pelvimetry”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1985

[Obstetric pelvimetry using digital radiography (CT topogram)].

Radiographic examination during pregnancy and pelvimetry before pregnancy are still required for particular indications. The use of digital radiography (lateral topogram on CT) reduces the radiation dose to the foetus and ovaries by a factor of 10 to 100, as compared with conventional pelvimetry, as described by Guthmann. The accuracy of this method is satisfactory, the technique is simple, it is rapid and is easy for the patient, particularly for pregnant women. As long as pelvimetry is not possible without ionising radiation, we consider pelvimetry with digital radiography, when strictly indicated, to be acceptable. In order to determine the transverse diameter of the pelvis, a single additional CT cut through the narrowest part of the pelvis is suggested.

Female↗
PubMed1982

Roentgenographic pelvimetry in single vertex pregnancies.

Of the 4,529 women delivered of infants at The John Hopkins Hospital during 1976 and 1977, 212 (5%) had roentgenographic pelvimetry. An analysis of a subgroup of 142 single vertex pregnancies with radiographic pelvimetry during this two-year period is presented. The cesarean section rate was 40% among patients selected for roentgenographic pelvimetry whose pelvis was found to be adequate. Vaginal delivery in women with a pelvis radiographically shown to be small was accomplished in 27% of patients with failure to progress in labor and in 22% of the patients with a fetus in the floating vertex presentation. Patients with a small pelvis who delivered vaginally had significantly smaller infants than those delivered by cesarean section (2,785 +/- 399 gm vs 3,146 +/- 433 gm). The only significant difference in pelvic measurements between these two groups occurred in the AP diameter of the inlet (11.5 +/- 1.1 cm vs 10.5 +/- 1.0 cm). Roentgenographic pelvimetry of single pregnancies as evaluated in this study appears to have limited clinical usefulness.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1975

The utilization and efficacy of pelvimetry.

Data from non random groups of deliveries with some identical clinical factors were compared and certain conclusions are suggested. Most x-ray examinations which cause significant fetal exposure are pelvimetries. There appears to be no uniform set of indications for performing pelvimetry. Instead, the criteria seem to vary from hospital to hospital and even from physician to physician within the same hospital. A normal pelvimetry gives the physicina little confidence that a cesarean section will not be necessary. The duration of labor is not significantly altered by pelvimetry in those cases needing a cesarean section for cephalopelvic disproportion or following unsuccessful oxytocin stimulation.

Cesarean Section↗
PubMed1986

Reliability of radiographic pelvimetry. A methodological study.

The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of radiographic pelvimetry. 48 radiologists were asked to estimate the pelvic inlet and outlet diameters from copies of 20 pelvimetry radiographs. We found that every third patient will have the sum of her pelvic outlet over- or underestimated by at least 4 mm, and 3% by more than 10 mm. The random measurement error of the sum of the pelvic outlet is about four times greater than the systematic error. The random error of the sagittal outlet diameter contributes to almost half of the total measurement error of the pelvic outlet sum. The measurement values of radiographic pelvimetry are often expressed in mm, which may give an impression of exactness that is obviously not well founded. Only in a few cases where the measurements suggest a severe feto-pelvic disproportion is it justified to do an elective cesarean section on the basis of radiographic pelvimetry only.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed1992

MR pelvimetry--a practical alternative.

Pelvimetry remains a useful technique as part of the assessment of the term breech pregnancy where vaginal delivery is planned. MR pelvimetry is accurate, well tolerated and shows soft-tissue structures as well as bone. It avoids the potentially carcinogenic effects of ionising radiation and is thought to be completely safe for mother and fetus. A technique of MR pelvimetry is described which uses gradient-echo sequences. This quick, practical method makes minimal inroads into valuable scanning time, and may therefore be considered a potentially cost-effective alternative to conventional pelvimetry.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

[Indications of radio-pelvimetry at a university hospital and a district general hospital].

Studies carried out on the phantom have shown how reliable transverse diameter measurements of the pelvis are when carried out by X-Ray scanning pelvimetry compared with conventional X-Ray pelvimetry. The practice of scanning radiopelvimetry (digital radiography) depends on the availability of the machine and of an induced, secondary circuit. The arrival of this new technique makes it necessary for the sake of economy to limit the indications for the investigation. We have studied the indications for the examination in a population of pregnant women in a University Hospital Service as well as pregnant women in a District General Hospital. Since the conditions under which obstetrics are carried out in general hospitals are more precarious, more radiological examinations are carried out in them. Frequently investigations were carried out on primiparous women who have normal pelves. It appeared difficult to lower the number of indications. Digital X-Rays will therefore cost a lot. In university hospitals the indications for carrying out the investigations were studied critically. It seems to be possible to reduce the numbers to 6% of all patients who are delivered. Rationalizing the indications will make it possible to avoid the extra cost which results from carrying out scanning X-Ray pelvimetries more reliably and delivering a lesser dose of X-Rays than ordinary conventional X-Ray pelvimetries deliver.

Female↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A randomized trial of medical quality assurance. Improving physicians' use of pelvimetry.

The capacity of educational programs to improve physician performance remains doubtful despite many evaluative efforts. This is especially true for programs sponsored by the federal government. We tested the efficacy of an educational program conducted by Professional Standards Review Organizations in reducing the inappropriate use of x-ray pelvimetry. This procedure may cause harm to the fetus, and there is little evidence that it is efficacious. We randomly assigned 120 hospitals in six Professional Standards Review Organizations to study and control groups. Physicians with delivery privileges at each study hospital participated in an educational program that discussed acceptable indications for x-ray pelvimetry. Pelvimetry use was similar in study and control hospitals before the program. However, after the program, pelvimetry was performed by physicians at study hospitals less than one third as often as by physicians at control hospitals. We conclude that educational programs can improve physician performance substantially and that such programs can be effectively conducted by federally sponsored physician organizations.

Education, Medical, Continuing↗
PubMed1986

Computed tomographic pelvimetry.

Pelvimetry can be performed on a computed tomographic (CT) scanner using anteroposterior and lateral scanned projection radiographs (Scout View) plus a single CT slice through the low pelvis. This technique yields accurate measurements of the maternal pelvis that do not need compensation for magnification. The fetal lie and presentation can be easily assessed, along with the fetal neck for hyperextension. In addition, the total radiation dose to both mother and fetus is significantly lower than with routine plain film pelvimetry. Since the procedure is quick, easy to perform and competitive in cost, CT pelvimetry should be the procedure of choice in those rare instances in which pelvimetry is indicated.

Female↗
PubMed1985

Prospective randomized study of x-ray pelvimetry in the primigravida.

A prospective randomized study was performed to determine the usefulness of x-ray pelvimetry before oxytocin induction or augmentation. Two hundred primiparous women were entered into this study. Agreement on pelvic size by the clinical and radiologic assessment occurred in 76.5% of the cases. When the total groups were compared, there were no differences in pregnancy outcome. In the induction of labor subgroups there were less forcep deliveries and lower five-minute Apgar scores in the pelvimetry group. In the augmentation subgroups there were no differences. The subgroup of patients diagnosed clinically to have a borderline pelvis, had a higher incidence of cesarean section (P less than .05) if they had x-ray pelvimetry. These results suggest that the elimination of x-ray pelvimetry in primigravida women does not lead to a compromise in infant outcome when electronic fetal monitoring is used.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

X-ray pelvimetry: helpful or harmful?

This study was performed (1) to clarify the usefulness of x-ray pelvimetry in diagnosing cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD), particularly in patients with abnormal labor, and (2) to examine the association between infant birthweight and mode of delivery. The subjects were 100 consecutive patients who underwent x-ray pelvimetry. A retrospective chart review was done to collect demographic data and evaluate Friedman labor curves. Radiologic dimensions were tabulated for anteroposterior diameter, transverse diameter, and summation plane values of both inlet and midpelvic planes. Average pelvimetric values for subjects delivered vaginally and those delivered abdominally were compared, and Hotelling's T2 analyses were conducted to determine whether the differences were statistically significant. Average birthweights of infants born to women in cesarean section and vaginal delivery groups were also compared, with t tests conducted to determine statistical significance. Results showed that even in a select group of patients in abnormal labor with the highest probability of CPD--a condition it was believed x-ray pelvimetry could diagnose--no significant difference in bony pelvic dimensions existed between vaginal and cesarean delivered patients. The cesarean group did, however, deliver significantly heavier infants. The results question the usefulness of x-ray pelvimetry in diagnosing CPD.

Birth Weight↗
PubMed1980

X-ray pelvimetry in clinical obstetrics.

X-ray pelvimetry has been used in obstetrics for over 80 years, but its clinical usefulness remains uncertain. Review of 101 consecutive x-ray pelvimetries obtained by Brown's modification of the Colcher-Sussman technique demonstrated the anteroposterior measurements to be of no value in predicting the eventual method of delivery. However, a transverse of the inlet of less than 13.0 cm and a transverse of the midpelvis of less than 10.0 cm were each associated with an increased frequency of operative delivery. In 94 cases no new information was obtained by x-ray pelvimetry; in the other 7 patients the information obtained was equally accessible by either ultrasonography or abdominal scout film. The authors conclude that x-ray pelvimetry by the technique used in their institution has very limited usefulness in clinical obstetrics.

Delivery, Obstetric↗
PubMed2002

Pelvimetry and patient acceptability compared between open 0.5-T and closed 1.5-T MR systems.

Our objective was to compare maternal pelvimetry and patient acceptability between open low-field (0.5-T) and closed 1.5-T MR systems. Thirty women referred for pelvimetry (pregnant: n=15) were scanned twice in the supine position, once in the vertical open system and once in the closed system. Each patient completed a comfort and acceptability questionnaire. Pelvimetric and questionnaire data were compared between systems. Total scan time was double in the open system (7:52+/-1:47 vs 3:12+/-1:20 min). Poor image quality in the open system prevented assessment of interspinous and intertuberous diameters in one woman and all measurements in another, both pregnant, with abdominal circumferences >120 cm. The open system was much more acceptable in terms of claustrophobia and confinement (both p<0.01). Claustrophobia interrupted one closed examination. Thirty-three percent of pregnant women in both systems reported fear of fetal harm. Sixty percent of all women preferred the open system, 7% the closed system, and 33% had no preference. Limits of agreement of 3-5% from the mean for all diameters confirmed good pelvimetric reproducibility. Women's preference for open-system MR pelvimetry is feasible with abdominal circumferences <or=120 cm.

Abdominal Cavity↗
PubMed1991

[A technic of magnetic resonance tomographic pelvimetry in obstetrics].

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRL) allows for the first time direct determination of maternal pelvic dimensions without ionising radiation. Phantom measurements and the correlation with traditional pelvimetric measurements in 10 patients after Caesarean section have shown mean differences of +/- 2 mm, with a maximum of 5 mm. The evaluation of pelvic configuration is obtained analogous to the conventional roentgenogram. In addition to conventional or digital x-ray pelvimetry, the soft tissues of the maternal pelvis and the presenting part of the foetus is delineated with high contrast. Positioning in the body coil can be accomplished even late in pregnancy or in impending labour, acceptance by the pregnant women being high. Whereas in a given indication after delivery conventional x-ray pelvimetry continues to be performed, antenatally MRI pelvimetry has now been established in our Departments as the method of choice--based on meanwhile 107 examinations. Present drawbacks are the relatively high cost and the limited availability of MR units.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗
PubMed1986

[Vaginosonographic pelvimetry as a new method of the sonographic determination of internal pelvic measurements].

Up to now sonographical pelvimetry has been performed by employing compound scanners. The development of a new vaginal scanner (panorama scanner) offers the possibility of using modern real-time ultrasound equipment for pelvimetry. Measurements were performed by vaginal scanner, compound scanner and after delivery by x-ray examination in 48 patients. Evaluation of our data showed a good correlation of all three methods. In contrary to the compound scanner vaginosonographical pelvimetry is not affected by the gestational week. Furthermore this method allows also the measurement of the transversal pelvic diameter.

Female↗
PubMed1989

[Obstetric pelvimetry using digital image intensifier radiography].

Obstetric pelvimetry can be performed by digital image intensifier radiography using very low exposure doses. Comparative measurements show a reduction of the entrance dose to 5% of conventional respectively 15% of high speed film-screen radiography. Phantom measurements have shown an accuracy of +/- 5 mm. In 30 patients the transverse diameter of the pelvic entrance, of the interspinous and of the intertuberous level as well as the sagittal diameter of the pelvic entrance and outlet were measured. Pelvimetry is indicated for the early recognition of certain risks if anamnestic (previous Caesarean section), clinical (eg. external pelvimetry) or fetometric features indicate the evidence of disproportion. As a radiological method the image intensifier radiography appears particularly recommendable in respect of its low exposure dose and the possibility of interactive measurements with subsequent documentation of the diameters and values.

Female↗
PubMed2005

Measurement error in computed tomography pelvimetry.

Computed tomography pelvimetry is still used in clinical practice. We wished to quantify observer error in order to assess the level of confidence with which pelvic measurements can be described as adequate or inadequate. Anteroposterior inlet, anteroposterior outlet, transverse inlet and interspinous distances were measured from 11 CT pelvimetry examinations by five observers at one institution. Three CT pelvimetries were measured by five observers at a second institution. Intraobserver and interobserver variation was assessed using analysis of variance. Reliability of measurements was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient. Combined error was calculated to determine 95% confidence limits for published minimum recommended pelvic measurements. The standard error of measurement, combining all sources, for measurement of the bony dimensions of the pelvis were: for anteroposterior inlet, 2.0 mm; anteroposterior outlet, 6.9 mm; transverse inlet, 1.3 mm; and interspinous distance, 2.1 mm. The 95% confidence interval around the recommended anteroposterior outlet of 100 mm was 88.5-111.3 mm. Observer variation in measurement of anteroposterior outlet is so large as to make the measurement of doubtful clinical utility.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1991

The role of postnatal x-ray pelvimetry after caesarean section in the management of subsequent delivery.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of postnatal x-ray pelvimetry after caesarean section on the management of the subsequent pregnancy. The case records of 331 women delivered by casearean section in their first pregnancy were reviewed. By standard radiological criteria, the pelvis was considered to be inadequate in 248 (75%) of them and adequate in 83 (25%). Of the women with a radiologically inadequate pelvis, 172 underwent an elective caesarean section. Seventy-six were allowed vaginal delivery: 51 of these women delivered vaginally and 25 required an emergency caesarean section. Of the women with a radiologically adequate pelvis, 61 achieved a vaginal delivery and 22 were delivered by caesarean section. All of the three cases of uterine rupture occurred in women with a radiologically adequate pelvis. This study suggests that x-ray pelvimetry is not a good predictor of the outcome of a trial of vaginal delivery. We conclude that the practice of routine postnatal pelvimetry should be abandoned.

Birth Weight↗
PubMed1995

Technical note: digital radiographic pelvimetry--a novel, low dose, accurate technique.

A technique is described for lateral pelvimetry which results in a lower radiation dose than that resulting from conventional film-screen pelvimetry and computed tomography (CT) pelvimetry. It uses digital radiographic imaging thereby closely matching conventional techniques yet additionally providing post-processing facilities including distance measurement and contrast adjustment. The digital technique was evaluated with an anthropomorphic phantom and compared with the conventional technique by measuring entrance surface doses on two groups of post-natal patients. Digital radiography gave radiation doses 10 times lower than those using conventional techniques.

Female↗