Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Patient Simulation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Diagnosis of alcoholism in a simulated patient encounter by primary care physicians.

Although early detection and treatment of alcoholism have been shown to be efficacious, it is widely accepted that primary care physicians often fail to diagnose alcoholism. In this study, a computerized, simulated encounter with an alcoholic patient was used to assess the performance of a randomly selected sample of primary care physicians in diagnosing alcoholism. Of 95 physicians in this study, only 32 percent diagnosed alcoholism with maximal certainty. There was great variability among physicians in the threshold of information needed to diagnose alcoholism. One third of subjects misinterpreted symptoms of alcoholism and erroneously made other psychiatric diagnoses, chiefly anxiety or depression. Results of this pilot study were not associated with the physicians' age, sex, specialty, duration of training, or reported personal impact of alcoholism. This study provides further evidence of the need for additional education of primary care physicians if such physicians are to succeed in reducing the dramatic impact of alcoholism and alcohol abuse on public health.

Alcoholism

Variability in doctors' problem-solving as measured by open-ended written patient simulations.

The uncertain validity of written simulations could be due to the difficulty in setting criteria for optimal performance. Usually criteria are set by definition of a limited number of 'correct answers' by a panel of experts reached through an open discussion. This is an artificial situation which entails mutual influence and forces the participants to respond to the necessity to reach a consensus. In the present report we describe an attempt to set 'correct answers' by the independent performance of 15 board-certified internists on four written simulations. There was a marked variability in responses due to legitimate differences in approach, to obvious errors in interpretation of the provided data and to possible differences between the expert behaviour in a real life and in a simulated setting. We believe that the criteria for acceptable performance on written clinical simulations should be determined by independent experts, rather than by a group consensus. Students who receive after the examination a compiled list of options selected by experts in response to the same questions may obtain a more realistic insight into the complexity of clinical problem-solving.

Clinical Competence

Simulated patients.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Education, Medical