Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PPAR”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Expression of cFABP and PPAR in trophoblast cells: effect of PPAR ligands on linoleic acid uptake and differentiation.

Throughout gestation, fetal growth depends, in part, on placental transfer of maternal essential fatty acid (EFA) and long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid. All fatty acid (FA) can cross lipid bilayer by simple diffusion, such as those in the syncytiotrophoblasts, the multinucleated, terminally differentiated trophoblast cells. The trophoblasts differentiation process is accompanied by an increase of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) secretion and an inhibition of Human Achaete-Scute Homologue-2 expression (Hash-2). Furthermore, a number of FA-binding proteins (FABPs) have been identified in membrane and cytoplasm of mammalian cells, which are thought to facilitate the transfer of FA across membranes and their intracellular channeling. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the implication of cFABPs in linoleic acid (LA) uptake by human trophoblast cells according to differentiation. Moreover, since peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARs) regulate the expression of cFABP and play an important role in trophoblast cells differentiation, the effects of PPARs ligands are verified on cFABP expression and differentiation. Herein, we reported the increase of the expression of liver and heart FABP (L- and H-FABP) upon differentiation of trophoblast cells, an inhibition of PPAR alpha and beta, while PPAR gamma levels remains unchanged. The nonselective peroxisome-proliferating agents, bezafibrate and LA, impaired trophoblast differentiation, and reduced L- and H-FABP expression. Furthermore, cobalt, a chemical agent known to mimic hypoxia, inhibits trophoblast cells differentiation and diminishes H-, L-FABP and PPARs expression. Finally, both treatments show no influence on LA uptake by trophoblast cells. In conclusion, this study showed that there is no correlation between the expression of H- and L-FABP and LA uptake by trophoblast cells and that bezafibrate and LA greatly impaired trophoblast cells differentiation.

Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins↗

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma coactivator-1 recruitment regulates PPAR subtype specificity.

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) alpha and gamma play key roles in the transcriptional control of contrasting metabolic pathways such as adipogenesis and fatty acid beta-oxidation. Both ligand-activated nuclear receptors bind to common target gene response elements and interact with distinct domains of the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1 to attain their full transcriptional potency. Thus, PPAR subtype specificity may be determined by ligand availability and transcription factor or coactivator expression levels. To identify other, perhaps more precise mechanisms contributing to PPAR subtype specificity, we studied PGC-1 recruitment by PPARs using a previously described hormone response element in the human UCP1 promoter and a human brown adipocyte cell line as our model system. As in rodents, PGC-1 is involved in the transcriptional regulation of the UCP1 gene in humans and mediates the effects of PPARalpha and PPARgamma agonists and retinoic acid. Interestingly, a previously postulated PGC-1 repressor selectively affects the PPARalpha-mediated activation of UCP1 gene expression. Furthermore, inhibition of p38 MAPK signaling, known to regulate the PGC-1/repressor interaction, decreases the stimulatory effect of PPARalpha agonist treatment without reducing the response to thiazolidinedione or retinoic acid. These data support a model whereby PPAR subtype specificity is regulated by recruitment of PGC-1.

Adipocytes↗

PPAR(alpha) and PPAR(gamma) activators suppress the monocyte-macrophage apoB-48 receptor.

Certain triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs), specifically chylomicrons, dyslipemic VLDLs, and their remnants, are atherogenic and can induce monocyte-macrophage foam cell formation in vitro via the apolipoprotein B-48 receptor (apoB-48R). Human atherosclerotic lesion foam cells express the apoB-48R, as determined immunohistochemically, suggesting it can play a role in the conversion of macrophages into foam cells in vivo. The regulation of the apoB-48R in monocyte-macrophages is not fully understood, albeit previous studies indicated that cellular sterol levels and state of differentiation do not affect apoB-48R expression. Since peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) regulate some aspects of cellular lipid metabolism and may be protective in atherogenesis by up-regulation of liver X-activated receptor alpha and ATP-binding cassette transporter A1, we examined the regulation of apoB-48R by PPAR ligands in human monocyte-macrophages. Using real-time PCR, Northern, Western, and functional cellular lipid accumulation assays, we show that PPARalpha and PPARgamma activators significantly suppress the expression of apoB-48R mRNA in human THP-1 and blood-borne monocyte-macrophages. Moreover, PPAR activators inhibit the expression of the apoB-48R protein and, notably, the apoB-48R-mediated lipid accumulation of TRL by THP-1 monocytes in vitro. If PPAR activators also suppress the apoB-48R pathway in vivo, diminished apoB-48R-mediated monocyte-macrophage lipid accumulation may be yet another antiatherogenic effect of the action of PPAR ligands.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter 1↗

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha activation prevents diabetes in OLETF rats: comparison with PPAR-gamma activation.

Lipid accumulation in nonadipose tissues is closely related to the development of type 2 diabetes in obese subjects. We examined the potential preventive effect of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha and PPAR-gamma stimulation on the development of diabetes in obese diabetes-prone OLETF rats. Chronic administration of a PPAR-alpha agonist (0.5% [wt/wt] fenofibrate) or a PPAR-gamma agonist (3 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1) rosiglitazone) completely prevented the development of glycosuria. Pancreatic islets from untreated OLETF rats underwent sequential hypertrophy and atrophy, which was completely prevented by chronic fenofibrate treatment. In contrast, rosiglitazone treatment did not affect islet hypertrophy at earlier stages but prevented beta-cell atrophy at later stages. Fenofibrate treatment decreased body weight and visceral fat, whereas rosiglitazone treatment increased body weight. Despite the opposite effects on adiposity, both drugs were equally effective in improving insulin actions in skeletal muscle. Furthermore, both drugs significantly decreased the triglyceride content in the soleus muscle and pancreatic islets. The present study demonstrates that the PPAR-alpha agonist fenofibrate prevents the development of diabetes in OLETF rats by reducing adiposity, improving peripheral insulin action, and exerting beneficial effects on pancreatic beta-cells.

Adipose Tissue↗

Human and rat peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) demonstrate similar tissue distribution but different responsiveness to PPAR activators.

We have isolated a human peroxisomal proliferator activated receptor (hPPAR) from a human liver cDNA library. Based on sequence analysis, we have determined that this cDNA encodes the human PPAR alpha. When assayed in a reconstituted hPPAR responsive transcription system in mammalian CV-1 cells, this receptor was shown to be transcriptionally activated by hypolipidemic agents like clofibric acid, and ETYA (5,8,11,14-eicosatetraynoic acid; a synthetic arachidonic acid homolog). When analyzed in CV-1 cells, the rat PPAR alpha was similarly transcriptionally regulated. However, when assayed in a human liver cell line (HepG2) we noticed that ETYA was a more efficient activator of hPPAR alpha than rPPAR alpha. Thus, factors other than the receptor are important in determining the cellular responsiveness to this class of compounds. Interestingly, WY-14,643, another peroxisome proliferator, was a much more potent activator of rPPAR alpha than human PPAR alpha when assayed in both cell lines. This may explain in part why certain fibrates are potent hepatocarcinogens in rodents. Northern analysis indicates that hPPAR alpha and rPPAR alpha are well expressed in heart, kidney and liver. We further demonstrate that hPPAR alpha and human retinoid X receptor alpha synergistically interact to bind and transactivate through a peroxisomal proliferator response element. Thus in a similar cell and promoter context the rat and human PPARs show a differential response to certain activators. Cumulatively these data suggest that differential ligand responsiveness does not provide a complete explanation for the different biological effects exhibited by hypolipidemic drugs when administered to humans and rats.

5,8,11,14-Eicosatetraynoic Acid↗

Application of fluorescent differential display and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha-null mice to analyze PPAR target genes.

In conclusion, we have applied the fluorescent differential method and the PPAR alpha-null mouse model for the rapid isolation of expression tags of PPAR alpha target genes that are involved in the action of peroxisome proliferators and in the regulation of lipid homeostasis under energy deprivation. Identification of a wide spectrum of PPAR alpha target genes will provide new insights into the diverse cellular pathways regulated by these receptor, and this information will be critical for understanding the complicated biological interactions among members of the PPAR alpha target genes. With the recent technological advancement, a newer method, such as DNA microarray, has emerged in the identification of differential gene expressions. This new DNA microarray method, in conjunction with the differential display method, is the first important step toward understanding the molecular mechanisms of gene interactions in any biological systems and can speed up the search for differential gene expressions.

Animals↗

Expression of peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) in human hair follicles and PPAR alpha involvement in hair growth.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), which belong to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, have recently been described as potent key regulators of epidermal development. As 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, retinoic acid and triiodothyronine are known to exert effects on skin and hair follicle growth through similar receptors, we decided to investigate both the expression pattern of the PPAR alpha, -delta and -gamma subtypes and their role in human hair follicles. Using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry, we established that PPAR alpha, -delta and -gamma were expressed in both dermal and epithelial human hair follicle cells. Additionally, we evaluated the dose effect of clofibrate, a PPAR alpha ligand, on the survival of human hair follicles in culture. A beneficial effect was observed within a narrow range of concentrations.

Cell Survival↗

Tetradecylthioacetic acid inhibits growth of rat glioma cells ex vivo and in vivo via PPAR-dependent and PPAR-independent pathways.

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are transcription factors involved in fatty acid metabolism and energy homeostasis. The PPARs also play crucial roles in the control of cellular growth and differentiation. Especially, the recently emerged concept of ligand-dependent PPARgamma-mediated inhibition of cancer cell proliferation through induction of G(1)-phase arrest and differentiation is of clinical interest to cancer therapy. Tetradecylthioacetic acid (TTA) is a sulphur-substituted saturated fatty acid analog with unique biochemical properties. In this study, we investigated the effects of TTA-administration on cell proliferation in glioma cancer models. The rat glioma cell line BT4Cn, whether grown in culture or implanted in rats, expressed significant levels of PPARgamma and PPARdelta, with PPARgamma being the predominant PPAR subtype. In BT4Cn cells, TTA activated all PPAR subtypes in a dose-dependent manner. In cell culture experiments, the PPARgamma-selective ligand BRL49653 moderately inhibited growth of BT4Cn cells, whereas administration of TTA resulted in a marked growth inhibition. Administration of the PPARgamma-selective antagonist GW9662 abolished BRL49653-induced growth inhibition, but only marginally reduced the effect of TTA. TTA reduced tumor growth and increased the survival time of rats with implanted BT4Cn tumor. TTA-induced apoptosis in BT4Cn cells, and the administration of TTA led to cytochrome c release from mitochondria and increased the glutathione content in glioma cells. In conclusion, our results indicate that TTA inhibits proliferation of glioma cancer cells through both PPARgamma-dependent and PPARgamma-independent pathways, of which the latter appears to predominate.

Animals↗

Selective PPAR modulators, dual and pan PPAR agonists: multimodal drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis.

More than 70% of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) die because of cardiovascular diseases. Current therapeutic strategies are based on separate treatment of insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia. Development of drugs with multimodal activities should improve management of the global cardiovascular risk of T2DM patients and result in better patient compliance. New therapeutic strategies are aimed at targeting the entire spectrum of dysfunctioning organs, cells and regulatory pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of T2DM, dyslipidaemia and atherosclerosis. PPAR family members play major roles in the regulation of lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis and inflammatory processes, making these transcription factors ideal targets for therapeutic strategies against these diseases. This review discusses why PPARs and development of novel selective PPAR modulators, dual and pan PPAR agonists constitute promising approaches for the treatment of diabetes, dyslipidaemia and atherosclerosis.

Animals↗

Involvement of PPAR gamma co-activator-1, nuclear respiratory factors 1 and 2, and PPAR alpha in the adaptive response to endurance exercise.

Endurance exercise training induces an increase in the respiratory capacity of muscle, resulting in an increased capacity to generate ATP as well as improved efficiency of muscle contraction. Such adaptations are largely the result of a coordinated genetic response that increases mitochondrial proteins, fatty acid oxidation enzymes and the exercise- and insulin-stimulated glucose transporter GLUT4, and shifts the contractile and regulatory proteins to their more efficient isoforms. In recent years a number of the transcriptional regulators involved in this genetic response have been identified and these factors can be classified into two different groups. The first group comprises transcription factors such as nuclear respiratory factors (NRF) 1 and 2 and PPAR alpha that bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner. The second group, referred to as transcriptional co-activators, alter transcription without directly binding to DNA. The PPAR gamma co-activator (PGC) family of proteins have been identified as the central family of transcriptional co-activators for induction of mitochondrial biogenesis. PGC-1 alpha is activated by exercise, and is sufficient to produce the endurance phenotype through direct interactions with NRF-1 and PPAR alpha, and potentially NRF-2. Furthering the understanding of the activation of PGC proteins following exercise has implications beyond improving athletic performance, including the possibility of providing targets for the treatment of frailty in the elderly, obesity and diseases such as mitochondrial myopathies and diabetes.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

Indanylacetic acid derivatives carrying aryl-pyridyl and aryl-pyrimidinyl tail groups--new classes of PPAR gamma/delta and PPAR alpha/gamma/delta agonists.

Modulation of PPAR activities represents an attractive approach for the treatment of diabetes with associated cardiovascular complications. The indanylacetic acid structural motif has proven useful in the generation of potent and tunable PPAR ligands. Modification of the substituents on the linker and the heterocycle tail group allowed for the modulation of the selectivity at the different receptor subtypes. Compound 33 was evaluated in vivo, where it displayed the desired reduction of glucose levels and increase in HDL levels in various animal models.

Acetates↗

Polarity and specific sequence requirements of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)/retinoid X receptor heterodimer binding to DNA. A functional analysis of the malic enzyme gene PPAR response element.

The malic enzyme (ME) gene is a target for both thyroid hormone receptors and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR). Within the ME promoter, two direct repeat (DR)-1-like elements, MEp and MEd, have been identified as putative PPAR response elements (PPRE). We demonstrate that only MEp and not MEd is able to bind PPAR/retinoid X receptor (RXR) heterodimers and mediate peroxisome proliferator signaling. Taking advantage of the close sequence resemblance of MEp and MEd, we have identified crucial determinants of a PPRE. Using reciprocal mutation analyses of these two elements, we show the preference for adenine as the spacing nucleotide between the two half-sites of the PPRE and demonstrate the importance of the two first bases flanking the core DR1 in 5'. This latter feature of the PPRE lead us to consider the polarity of the PPAR/RXR heterodimer bound to its cognate element. We demonstrate that, in contrast to the polarity of RXR/TR and RXR/RAR bound to DR4 and DR5 elements respectively, PPAR binds to the 5' extended half-site of the response element, while RXR occupies the 3' half-site. Consistent with this polarity is our finding that formation and binding of the PPAR/RXR heterodimer requires an intact hinge T region in RXR while its integrity is not required for binding of the RXR/TR heterodimer to a DR4.

3T3 Cells↗

Isolation and characterization of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) interacting protein (PRIP) as a coactivator for PPAR.

We previously isolated and identified steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-binding protein (PBP/PPARBP) as coactivators for PPAR, using the ligand-binding domain of PPARgamma as bait in a yeast two-hybrid screening. As part of our continuing effort to identify cofactors that influence the transcriptional activity of PPARs, we now report the isolation of a novel coactivator from mouse, designated PRIP (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor interacting protein), a nuclear protein with 2068 amino acids and encoded by 13 exons. Northern analysis showed that PRIP mRNA is ubiquitously expressed in many tissues of adult mice. PRIP contains two LXXLL signature motifs. The amino-terminal LXXLL motif (amino acid position 892 to 896) of PRIP was found to be necessary for nuclear receptor interaction, but the second LXXLL motif (amino acid position 1496 to 1500) appeared unable to bind PPARgamma. Deletion of the last 12 amino acids from the carboxyl terminus of PPARgamma resulted in the abolition of the interaction between PRIP and PPARgamma. PRIP also binds to PPARalpha, RARalpha, RXRalpha, ER, and TRbeta1, and this binding is increased in the presence of specific ligands. PRIP acts as a strong coactivator for PPARgamma in the yeast and also potentiates the transcriptional activities of PPARgamma and RXRalpha in mammalian cells. A truncated form of PRIP (amino acids 786-1132) acts as a dominant-negative repressor, suggesting that PRIP is a genuine coactivator.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Antidiabetic and hypolipidemic potential of DRF 2519--a dual activator of PPAR-alpha and PPAR-gamma.

We investigated the biological activity of Dr. Reddy's Research Foundation (DRF) 2519, a benzoxazinone analogue of the thiazolidinedione class of compounds. In the in vitro transactivation assay, DRF 2519 showed interesting dual activation of Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor (PPAR) alpha and gamma. In insulin-resistant ob/ob mouse model, DRF 2519 showed significant alleviation of insulin resistance and dyslipidemia, which is better than rosiglitazone. Fatty Zucker rats treated with DRF 2519 showed better reduction of plasma insulin, triglyceride and free fatty acid levels than those treated with rosiglitazone. In addition, these rats were able to clear plasma lipids better when challenged with exogenous lipid (i.v.). DRF 2519 treatment resulted in improved plasma lipid profiles in high-fat-fed Sprague-Dawley rats. Treated rats showed better plasma lipid clearance and hepatic triglyceride secretion. When compared to DRF 2519, fenofibrate was comparatively less efficacious while rosigltiazone showed no activity in these models. In ex vivo studies, DRF 2519 showed induction of liver acyl CoA oxidase mRNA and increase in lipoprotein lipase (LPL) protein expression and activity in adipose tissue. In the in vitro studies, DRF 2519 inhibited the lipid biosynthesis and secretion of apolipoprotein B from human hepatoma (Hep)G2 cells. It also enhanced insulin-induced relaxation of rat aortic smooth muscle. These results indicate that DRF 2519, a dual activator of PPAR-alpha and gamma, could be an interesting development candidate in the management of metabolic disorders and associated complications.

Animals↗

Human skeletal muscle fibre type variations correlate with PPAR alpha, PPAR delta and PGC-1 alpha mRNA.

AIMS: Studies from genetically modified animals have been instrumental in highlighting genes and their products involved in the regulation of muscle fibre type and oxidative phenotypes; however, evidence in humans is limited. Our aim was therefore to investigate expression of those genes implicated in the regulation of oxidative fibre phenotypes in humans. METHODS: Using quantitative polymerase chain reaction we determined mRNA expression of selected genes in skeletal muscle from three different groups, displaying physiological and pathological variations in muscle fibre type, activity and skeletal muscle metabolism respectively: (i) elite athletes (cyclists), with an increased proportion of type I slow twitch, oxidative fibres, (ii) normally active subjects with an average fibre type distribution, and (iii) spinal cord-injured subjects with a low proportion of type I fibres. RESULTS: Skeletal muscle mRNA expression of calcineurin Aalpha and Abeta, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha and -delta, and PPAR gamma coactivator (PGC)-1alpha and -1beta was determined. Calcineurin Aalpha and calcineurin Abeta mRNA expression was similar between groups. In contrast, mRNA expression of PPARalpha, PPARdelta, PGC-1alpha and -1beta was increased in athletes, when compared with normally active subjects. Furthermore, mRNA expression of PPARalpha, PPARdelta, PGC-1alpha and -1beta was reduced in spinal cord-injured subjects. Additionally, PPARalpha, PPARdelta and PGC-1alpha correlated with oxidative fibre content. CONCLUSION: Skeletal muscle mRNA expression of PPARalpha, PPARdelta, PGC-1alpha and -1beta reflects differences in type I muscle fibres associated with pathologically and physiologically induced skeletal muscle fibre type differences.

Adult↗

Suppression of plasma free fatty acids upregulates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha and delta and PPAR coactivator 1alpha in human skeletal muscle, but not lipid regulatory genes.

Fatty acids are an important ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) activation and transcriptional regulation of metabolic genes. To examine whether reduced plasma free fatty acid (FFA) availability affects the mRNA content of proteins involved in fuel metabolism in vivo, the skeletal muscle mRNA content of various transcription factors, transcriptional coactivators and genes encoding for lipid regulatory proteins were examined before and after 3 h of cycle exercise with (NA) and without (CON) pre-exercise ingestion of nicotinic acid (NA). NA resulted in a marked (3- to 6-fold) increase (P<0.05) in PPARalpha, PPARdelta and PPAR coactivator 1alpha (PGC1alpha) mRNA, but was without effect on nuclear respiratory factor-1 and Forkhead transcription factor, fatty acid transcolase/CD36, carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1, hormone sensitive lipase (HSL) and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4. Exercise in CON was associated with increased (P<0.05) PPARalpha, PPARdelta and PGC1alpha mRNA, which was similar in magnitude to levels observed with NA at rest. Exercise was generally without effect on the mRNA content of lipid regulatory proteins in CON and did not affect the mRNA content of the measured subset of transcription factors, transcriptional co-activators and lipid regulatory proteins during NA. To determine the possible mechanisms by which NA might affect PGC1alpha expression, we measured p38 MAP kinase (MAPK) and plasma epinephrine. Phosphorylation of p38 MAPK was increased (P<0.05) by NA treatment at rest, and this correlated (r2=0.84, P<0.01) with increased PGC1alpha. Despite this close relationship, increasing p38 MAPK in human primary myotubes was without effect on PGC1alpha mRNA content. Plasma epinephrine was elevated (P<0.05) by NA at rest (CON: 0.27+/-0.06, NA: 0.72+/-0.11 nM) and throughout exercise. Incubating human primary myotubes with epinephrine increased PGC1alpha independently of changes in p38 MAPK phosphorylation. Hence, despite the fact that NA ingestion decreased FFA availability, it promoted the induction of PPARalpha/delta and PGC1alpha gene expression to a similar degree as prolonged exercise. We suggest that the increase in PGC1alpha may be due to the elevated plasma epinephrine levels. Despite these changes in transcription factors/coactivators, the mRNA content of lipid regulatory proteins was generally unaffected by plasma FFA availability.

CD36 Antigens↗

Cross-talk between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha and liver X receptor (LXR) in nutritional regulation of fatty acid metabolism. II. LXRs suppress lipid degradation gene promoters through inhibition of PPAR signaling.

Fatty acid metabolism is transcriptionally regulated by two reciprocal systems: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha controls fatty acid degradation, whereas sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c activated by liver X receptor (LXR) regulates fatty acid synthesis. To explore potential interactions between LXR and PPAR, the effect of LXR activation on PPARalpha signaling was investigated. In luciferase reporter gene assays, overexpression of LXRalpha or beta suppressed PPARalpha-induced peroxisome proliferator response element-luciferase activity in a dose-dependent manner. LXR agonists, T0901317 and 22(R)-hydroxycholesterol, dose dependently enhanced the suppressive effects of LXRs. Gel shift assays demonstrated that LXR reduced binding of PPARalpha/retinoid X receptor (RXR) alpha to peroxisome proliferator response element. Addition of increasing amounts of RXRalpha restored these inhibitory effects in both luciferase and gel shift assays, suggesting the presence of RXRalpha competition. In vitro protein binding assays demonstrated that activation of LXR by an LXR agonist promoted formation of LXR/RXRalpha and, more importantly, LXR/PPARalpha heterodimers, leading to a reduction of PPARalpha/RXRalpha formation. Supportively, in vivo administration of the LXR ligand to mice and rat primary hepatocytes substantially decreased hepatic mRNA levels of PPARalpha-targeted genes in both basal and PPARalpha agonist-induced conditions. The amount of nuclear PPARalpha/RXR heterodimers in the mouse livers was induced by treatment with PPARalpha ligand, and was suppressed by superimposed LXR ligand. Taken together with data from the accompanying paper (Yoshikawa, T., T. Ide, H. Shimano, N. Yahagi, M. Amemiya-Kudo, T. Matsuzaka, S. Yatoh, T. Kitamine, H. Okazaki, Y. Tamura, M. Sekiya, A. Takahashi, A. H. Hasty, R. Sato, H. Sone, J. Osuga, S. Ishibashi, and N. Yamada, Endocrinology 144:1240-1254) describing PPARalpha suppression of the LXR-sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c pathway, we propose the presence of an intricate network of nutritional transcription factors with mutual interactions, resulting in efficient reciprocal regulation of lipid degradation and lipogenesis.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter 1↗

Alteration of a single amino acid in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPAR alpha) generates a PPAR delta phenotype.

Three pharmacologically important nuclear receptors, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs alpha, gamma, and delta), mediate key transcriptional responses involved in lipid homeostasis. The PPAR alpha and gamma subtypes are well conserved from Xenopus to man, but the beta/delta subtypes display substantial species variations in both structure and ligand activation profiles. Characterization of the avian cognates revealed a close relationship between chick (c) alpha and gamma subtypes to their mammalian counterparts, whereas the third chicken subtype was intermediate to Xenopus (x) beta and mammalian delta, establishing that beta and delta are orthologs. Like xPPAR beta, cPPAR beta responded efficiently to hypolipidemic compounds that fail to activate the human counterpart. This provided the opportunity to address the pharmacological problem as to how drug selectivity is achieved and the more global evolutionary question as to the minimal changes needed to generate a new class of receptor. X-ray crystallography and chimeric analyses combined with site-directed mutagenesis of avian and mammalian cognates revealed that a Met to Val change at residue 417 was sufficient to switch the human and chick phenotype. These results establish that the genetic drive to evolve a novel and functionally selectable receptor can be modulated by a single amino acid change and suggest how nuclear receptors can accommodate natural variation in species physiology.

Amino Acid Substitution↗