SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
277 untreated multiple myeloma patients of stage 1 (n = 33), II (n = 106) and III (n = 138) entered the study. Patients of stage II presenting a progressive tumor (n = 64) initially or during observation (n = 14) were treated with MivP (remissions: 61%). 138 patients of stage III were randomized to receive MivP or VBAMDex treatment. 51% of MivP treated patients responded versus 70% of the VBAMDex group. 71 responders of stage II and III with stable disease were randomized on Ifn-alpha maintenance versus no maintenance treatment. The relapse rate in both groups was 50% after 7 months. 75% survival was greater than 36 months in stage II and 11 months in stage III patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The tolerated dose of melphalan is limited by bone marrow suppression; when this complication is ameliorated by bone marrow transplantation, the dose-limiting toxicity becomes gastrointestinal mucositis. No intervention to date has been successful in modulating this life-threatening complication of melphalan. We conducted studies to develop a murine model of melphalan-induced gastrointestinal toxicity to facilitate the preclinical identification of effective strategies for reducing this toxicity. Melphalan given at the 90% lethal dosage produced severe gastrointestinal mucositis and mortality (13 of 23 treated mice). Syngeneic bone marrow transplantation, effective in preventing the myeloablation produced by total-body irradiation, was ineffective in preventing melphalan-induced mortality (16 of 23 treated mice), indicating that gastrointestinal mucositis was the dose-limiting toxicity. On the basis of the results of previous studies, which revealed that depletion of glutathione enhances the antineoplastic activity of melphalan and that glutathione is required for murine intestinal function, we attempted to modulate melphalan-induced gastrointestinal toxicity by the administration of glutathione (8-10 mmol/kg given in 1 ml sterile water by gavage at 12-h intervals for 4-8 doses). Glutathione therapy failed to produce a significant increase in mucosal glutathione content in animals treated with melphalan plus glutathione gavage as compared with those receiving melphalan alone (P > 0.05), and histologic mucosal injury secondary to melphalan was not reduced. The administration of glutathione in the presence or absence of concomitant bone marrow transplantation did not decrease melphalan-induced mortality (melphalan alone, 16/26 deaths; melphalan plus glutathione, 14/25 deaths; melphalan plus glutathione plus bone marrow transplantation, 20/26 deaths). Studies using a reduced melphalan dose (50% lethal dosage) produced similar results, with no survival benefit being seen following glutathione administration. Our studies suggest that melphalan-induced mucositis can be studied in a mouse model in which this complication is dose-limiting. Although glutathione administration at the dose and schedules initially studied is not effective in reducing this damage, other therapeutic strategies such as the use of alternative glutathione regimens or other thiols can be effectively studied in this system.
This study was conducted to define a new maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of melphalan and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) when used with the cytoprotective agent amifostine. Fifty-eight patients with various types of malignancy who were ineligible for higher-priority AHSCT protocols were entered on a phase I study of escalating doses of melphalan beginning at 220 mg/m(2) and advancing by 20 mg/m(2) increments in planned cohorts of 4 to 8 patients until severe regimen-related toxicity (RRT) was encountered. In all patients, amifostine 740 mg/m(2) was given on 2 occasions before the first melphalan dose (ie, 24 hours before and again 15 minutes before). AHSCT was given 24 hours after the first melphalan dose. Melphalan was given in doses up to and including 300 mg/m(2). Hematologic depression was profound, although it was rapidly and equally reversible at all melphalan doses. Although mucosal RRT was substantial, it was not the DLT, and some patients given the highest melphalan doses (ie, 300 mg/m(2)) did not develop mucosal RRT. The DLT was not clearly defined. Cardiac toxicity in the form of atrial fibrillation occurred in 3 of 36 patients treated with melphalan doses >/=280 mg/m(2) and was deemed fatal in 1 patient given melphalan 300 mg/m(2). (Another patient with a known cardiomyopathy was given melphalan 220 mg/m(2) and died as a result of heart failure but did not have atrial fibrillation.) Another patient given melphalan 300 mg/m(2) died of hepatic necrosis. The maximum tolerated dose of melphalan in this setting was thus considered to be 280 mg/m(2), and 27 patients were given this dose without severe RRT. Moreover, 38 patients were evaluable for delayed toxicity related to RRT; none was noted. Tumor responses have been noted at all melphalan doses and in all diagnostic groups, and 21 patients are alive at median day +1121 (range, day +136 to day +1923), including 16 without evidence of disease progression at median day +1075 (range, day +509 to day +1638). Amifostine and AHSCT permit the safe use of melphalan 280 mg/m(2), an apparent increase over the dose of melphalan that can be safely administered with AHSCT but without amifostine. Further studies are needed not only to confirm these findings, but also to define the antitumor efficacy of this regimen. Finally, it may be possible to evaluate additional methods of further dose escalation of melphalan in this setting.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the addition of low-dose interferon-alpha 2b to standard melphalan-prednisone therapy in patients with multiple myeloma. DESIGN: Randomized, multicenter, phase III study. SETTING: 15 university hospitals and 92 county hospitals in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, and Iceland. PATIENTS: 583 patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma. INTERVENTION: All patients received melphalan-prednisone every 6 weeks. Melphalan-prednisone therapy was interrupted after at least 8 courses in responding patients who achieved a plateau phase, and it was reinstituted at time of relapse. Patients randomly assigned to receive melphalan-prednisone and interferon also received interferon, 5 MU three times weekly, from the start of treatment through response, plateau phase, and relapse, until definitive failure of melphalan-prednisone occurred. MEASUREMENTS: Survival was the main outcome measure. Secondary measures were response rate, response and plateau phase duration, and toxicity. All analyses were done according to the principle of intention-to-treat. RESULTS: 45% of patients receiving melphalan-prednisone and 44% of patients receiving melphalan-prednisone and interferon achieved at least a partial response. Response duration and plateau phase duration were longer for patients receiving melphalan-prednisone and interferon than for patients receiving melphalan-prednisone alone (P < 0.05); the difference in median duration was 5 to 6 months. Toxicity was higher with melphalan-prednisone and interferon, and this led to premature discontinuation of interferon therapy in one third of patients and to a reduced overall dose intensity for melphalan. The median survival time was 29 months for patients receiving melphalan-prednisone and 32 months for patients receiving melphalan-prednisone and interferon. The risk ratio for death for patients receiving melphalan-prednisone compared with patients receiving melphalan-prednisone and interferon was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.40). CONCLUSIONS: Adding continuous low-dose interferon to standard melphalan-prednisone therapy does not improve response rate or survival. However, response duration and plateau phase duration are prolonged by maintenance therapy with interferon.
Our previous studies exploring melphalan resistance in the human rhabdomyosarcoma xenograft TE-671 MR revealed elevation of DNA polymerase-alpha and DNA polymerase-beta. The present study evaluated the alteration of melphalan activity in TE-671 (melphalan-sensitive) and TE-671 MR (melphalan-resistant) subcutaneous xenografts in nude mice after DNA polymerase-alpha was inhibited using aphidicolin glycinate (AG) and DNA polymerase-beta was inhibited using dideoxycytidine (DDC). Administration of AG or DDC did not produce toxicity or demonstrate antineoplastic activity when given alone. AG (90 mg/m2) enhanced the activity of melphalan against TE-671, with growth delays increasing by 8.4, 15.8, and 21.2 days over the regimen with melphalan only. AG (180 mg/m2) only modestly increased melphalan activity against TE-671 MR, with the growth delays increasing from 9.6 and 12.1 days using melphalan alone to 12.1 and 14.5 days using melphalan plus AG. AG (180 mg/m2) plus melphalan (the dose lethal to 10% of animals) produced greater weight loss compared with melphalan alone, whereas DDC plus melphalan produced no additional toxicity. DDC modestly enhanced the activity of melphalan plus AG against TE-671 MR. AG plus O6-benzylguanine did not increase the activity of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea against TE-671 or TE-671 MR. AG (90 mg/m2 and 180 mg/m2) inhibited DNA polymerase-alpha to 80% and 72% of control in TE-671 and 64% and 37% in TE-671 MR, and DDC inhibited DNA polymerase-beta to 59% in TE-671 and 48% in TE-671 MR. These results suggest a role for AG-mediated enhancement of melphalan activity, particularly in the treatment of newly diagnosed, melphalan-sensitive tumors.
Melphalan is a chemotherapeutic drug that exerts its cytotoxic effect mainly through the formation of DNA adducts. We report the specific immunohistochemical detection and visualisation of melphalan-DNA adducts using the monoclonal antibody MP5/73 in cultured tumour cells and solid tumour tissue from colorectal liver metastases from patients treated with melphalan. The human colon cancer cell lines HT29, SW480 and SW1116, and the rat colon cancer cell line CC531 were exposed to different concentrations of melphalan. In addition, tumour samples from 17 patients with colorectal liver metastases treated by isolated hepatic perfusion with high dose melphalan (200mg) were collected. Cell lines and tumour samples were stained with the MP5/73 antibody against melphalan-DNA adducts and cell viability was determined by an MTT assay. Melphalan-DNA adducts could be visualised by immunohistochemistry in both cultured cells and solid tumour tissue. A correlation between melphalan exposure concentration, the subsequent melphalan-DNA adduct staining intensity, and melphalan cytotoxicity existed for each individual cell line, but the level of both parameters independently differed between cell lines. Specific staining for melphalan-DNA adducts also was feasible in the human solid tumour tissue. There was considerable variation in melphalan-DNA adduct staining, staining intensity, and distribution in the tumour stroma and the tumour epithelium among the different patients. Melphalan-DNA adducts appeared to be more intense in tumour cells at the border of the tumour nodules than in tumour cells in the centre. Thus, visualisation of melphalan-DNA adducts by immunohistochemistry allows the study of distribution of melphalan-DNA adducts in solid tumours.
The effects of the diatomic radical, nitric oxide (NO), on melphalan-induced cytotoxicity in Chinese hamster V79 and human MCF-7 breast cancer cells were studied using clonogenic assays. NO delivered by the NO-releasing agent (C2H5)2N[N(O)NO]- Na+ (DEA/NO; 1 mM) resulted in enhancement of melphalan-mediated toxicity in Chinese hamster V79 lung fibroblasts and human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells by 3.6- and 4.3-fold, respectively, at the IC50 level. Nitrite/nitrate and diethylamine, the ultimate end products of DEA/NO decomposition, had little effect on melphalan cytotoxicity, which suggests that NO was responsible for the sensitization. Whereas maximal sensitization of melphalan cytotoxicity by DEA/NO was observed for simultaneous exposure of DEA/NO and melphalan, cells pretreated with DEA/NO were sensitized to melphalan for several hours after NO exposure. Reversing the order of treatment also resulted in a time-dependent enhancement in melphalan cytotoxicity. To explore possible mechanisms of NO enhancement of melphalan cytotoxicity, the effects of DEA/NO on three factors that might influence melphalan toxicity were examined, namely NO-mediated cell cycle perturbations, intracellular glutathione (GSH) levels and melphalan uptake. NO pretreatment resulted in a delayed entry into S phase and a G2/M block for both V79 and MCF-7 cells; however, cell cycle redistribution for V79 cells occurred after the cells returned to a level of cell survival, consistent with treatment with melphalan alone. After 15 min exposure of V79 cells to DEA/NO (1 mM), GSH levels were reduced to 40% of control values; however, GSH levels recovered fully after 1 h and were elevated 2 h after DEA/NO incubation. In contrast, DEA/NO (1 mM) incubation did not reduce GSH levels significantly in MCF-7 cells (approximately 10%). Melphalan uptake was increased by 33% after DEA/NO exposure in V79 cells. From these results enhancement of melphalan cytotoxicity mediated by NO appears to be complex and may involve several pathways, including possibly alteration of the repair of melphalan-induced lesions. Our observations may give insights for improving tumour kill with melphalan using either exogenous or possibly endogenous sources of NO.
Although melphalan has been used as a therapeutic reagent for multiple myeloma, many patients become refractory. To elucidate the mechanism of resistance to melphalan, we generated a melphalan-resistant myeloma cell line, KHM-11(EMS), by treating a parental line, KHM-11, with a mutagen, ethylmethanesulfonate. KHM-11(EMS) is 55 times more resistant to melphalan. gamma-Glutamylcysteine synthetase, P-glycoprotein, multidrug-resistance-associated protein, lung-resistance-related protein and the Bcl-2 family of proteins were not responsible for the drug resistance in KHM-11(EMS). Intracellular incorporation of melphalan to myeloma cells was determined by using [(14)C]-labeled melphalan. Accumulation of melphalan in KHM-11(EMS) was 43% of KHM-11, while the efflux rates were comparable in both cell lines. The uptake of melphalan was inhibited by the addition of L-phenylalanine, indicating that melphalan is incorporated through the L-phenylalanine transporter as reported previously. Expression of CD98, which was recently cloned as an L-phenylalanine transporter, was 6-fold decreased in KHM-11(EMS), suggesting that CD98 may be correlated with the incorporation of melphalan. CD98 expression and incorporation of melphalan were analyzed in fresh purified myeloma cells from 5 patients. All myeloma cells from 4 cases expressed CD98 at a high level and incorporated melphalan. However, tumor cells from 1 case expressed CD98 at low levels and did not incorporate melphalan. Taken together, reduced melphalan uptake could be responsible for the drug resistance in KHM-11(EMS), and down-regulation of CD98 may be related to this phenomenon. Further investigation of the correlation between impaired drug uptake and down-regulation of CD98 in myeloma cells should be important to understand the mechanism of resistance to melphalan.
Fluosol-DA with carbogen (95% oxygen and 5% carbon dioxide) breathing can increase the efficacy of melphalan. Addition of Fluosol-DA to treatment with melphalan leads to a greater increase in tumor growth delay under conditions of air breathing and carbogen breathing than does the fat emulsion Intralipid. The ability of melphalan to kill tumor cells increased with dose over the range of drug examined. At the lower doses of drug there is some increase in tumor cell killing seen with the addition of carbogen breathing or Fluosol-DA and air breathing; however, at the highest dose of the drug this difference disappeared. Throughout the melphalan dosage range examined there is approximately 1 log greater tumor cell kill observed with the addition of Fluosol-DA and carbogen breathing compared to the drug treatment alone. There was no significant difference in the survival of bone marrow cells under any of the treatment conditions. Fluosol-DA itself with air or carbogen breathing produced no detectable cross-links in DNA from tumors treated in vivo. The cross-linking factors for melphalan with air or carbogen breathing and for melphalan plus Fluosol-DA and air breathing were similar; when carbogen breathing was added to the treatment combination, the cross-linking factor increased almost 3-fold. When melphalan was dissolved in Fluosol-DA, the melphalan moved quickly into the lipophilic perfluorochemical particles so that after 1 h 60% of the drug was in the perfluorochemical layer. At 24 h, 85-90% of the melphalan was sequestered in the perfluorochemical particles. The pharmacokinetics of [14C]melphalan alone, [14C]melphalan plus Fluosol-DA, and [14C]melphalan prepared in Fluosol-DA were studied in several tissues of FSaIIC fibrosarcoma-bearing mice. In general, the tissue absorption and distribution t1/2s for melphalan were shortened in the presence of Fluosol-DA (except for kidneys). Shifting the t1/2s for absorption and distribution to shorter times produces a much sharper and earlier peak in the drug exposure of the tumor. Fluosol-DA provides a relatively nontoxic means of increasing oxygen delivery to tumors and a therapeutically meaningful way of improving melphalan antitumor activity.
Melphalan has been reported to be actively transported into tumor cells by two amino acid carrier systems. As amino acids are transported across cerebral capillaries by a facilitated mechanism, studies were undertaken to assess whether or not melphalan was transported similarly, and additionally to determine melphalan's plasma and brain pharmacokinetics. The brain uptake of [14C]melphalan was measured by an in situ brain perfusion technique in the anesthetized rat utilizing [14C]-melphalan. The cerebrovascular permeability-surface area product of [14C]melphalan was calculated at cold melphalan concentrations from O to 16.3 mumol/ml. The permeability-surface area product was concentration dependent and decreased from 10.8 +/- 0.6 (+/- SE) X 10(-4)S-1 at 0.02 mumol/ml melphalan to 5.4 +/- 0.3 X 10(-4)S-1 at 16.3 mumol/ml. The system became saturated at a concentration in excess of 0.1 mumol/ml. The Michaelis-Menten parameters Vmax and Km, determined by nonlinear regression analysis of the permeability-surface area product data, equaled 0.9 +/- 0.3 X 10(-4) mumol/s/g and 0.15 +/- 0.06 mumol/ml, respectively, for the saturable component of melphalan's brain uptake. The Kd of the nonsaturable component was 5.3 +/- 0.03 X 10(-4)S-1. Addition of the amino acid 1-phenylalanine to the brain perfusate inhibited the saturable component of melphalan's brain uptake. The analysis of the plasma and brain concentrations of melphalan by high-performance liquid chromatography, following i.v. melphalan administration, demonstrated that approximately 15% of the drug that was present in plasma entered the brain. These data suggest that the brain uptake of melphalan is facilitated, demonstrating concentration-dependent uptake, saturation, and inhibition, and that melphalan shares the large neutral amino acid carrier system at the blood-brain barrier.
Growth delay by melphalan of two fibrosarcomas in CBA mice was prolonged by intraperitoneal (i.p.) verapamil, 10 mg kg-1. Verapamil also increased the area under the blood concentration time curve and the gastrointestinal toxicity of melphalan. Verapamil promoted melphalan cytotoxicity to murine bone marrow both in vivo, by CFU-S assay, and in vitro, by CFU-GM assay. In 1 microgram ml-1 [14C]-melphalan, verapamil (10 micrograms ml-1) increased by 1.5 times the [14C]-melphalan accumulation by murine bone marrow, reversibly and independently of external calcium. Efflux of [14C]-melphalan from murine bone marrow was retarded by verapamil. Verapamil increased [14C]-melphalan uptake by disaggregated fibrosarcoma cells but had no effect on melphalan accumulation and cytotoxicity in human bone marrow. Although verapamil affected melphalan pharmacokinetics, enhancement of cellular melphalan uptake by verapamil in murine fibrosarcoma and bone marrow appeared to account for much of the increase in melphalan cytotoxicity. The lack of potentiation of melphalan by verapamil in human marrow suggests differences in melphalan transport or in verapamil membrane interactions in mouse and man.
BACKGROUND: Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) and melphalan for advanced extremity malignancies achieves significant complete response rates. To study molecular mechanisms underlying this response, a nude rat ILP model with a human melanoma xenograft was developed. METHODS: NIH1286 human melanoma was grown subcutaneously in the hind limb of nude rats. Anesthetized rats underwent a 10-minute ILP via femoral vessels with hetastarch, heparin, and melphalan, TNF, or TNF plus melphalan. The tumors and ulcers were measured and viable tumor area was calculated. Post-ILP tumors were analyzed by electron microscopy for vascular damage and also by liquid chromatography atmospheric pressure chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC/APCI/MS/MS) for free melphalan levels. Colorimetric 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-dephenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays were performed on NIH1286 cells and human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDMVEC) to test for direct cytotoxicity to TNF and melphalan. Post-ILP tumors sections were also examined by electron microscopy. RESULTS: The mean maximal decrease in viable tumor area after ILP for control, TNF, melphalan, and TNF + melphalan groups were 0%, 22 +/- 13%, 61 +/- 14%, and 100 +/- 0%, respectively. LC/APCI/MS/MS revealed no difference in the free tumor melphalan concentration between melphalan alone and TNF + melphalan groups. The percent cytotoxicity in MTT assays using TNF, melphalan, and TNF + melphalan against NIH1286 were 0%, 51-59%, and 74-81%, respectively, and against HDMVEC were 28%, 16-23%, and 6-13%, respectively. Electron microscopic analyses showed that addition of TNF to the perfusate caused erythrostasis in tumor blood vessels. CONCLUSION: We developed a human melanoma nude rat ILP model with tumor responses very similar to the human ILP trials. This model will allow further investigation of the synergistic mechanism of TNF and melphalan in human melanoma in a preclinical setting, and extension of this study to current clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: We have previously shown how tumor response of isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan was improved when tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) was added. Taking into account that other vasoactive drugs could also improve tumor response to ILP, we evaluated histamine (Hi) as an alternative to TNF-alpha. METHODS: We used a rat ILP model to assess the combined effects of Hi and melphalan (n = 6) on tumor regression, melphalan uptake (n = 6), and tissue histology (n = 2) compared with Hi or melphalan alone. We also evaluated the growth of BN-175 tumor cells as well as apoptosis, necrosis, cell morphology, and paracellular permeability of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) after Hi treatment alone and in combination with melphalan. RESULTS: The antitumor effect of the combination of Hi and melphalan in vivo was synergistic, and Hi-dependent reduction in tumor volume was blocked by H1 and H2 receptor inhibitors. Tumor regression was observed in 66% of the animals treated with Hi and melphalan, compared with 17% after treatment with Hi or melphalan alone. Tumor melphalan uptake increased and vascular integrity in the surrounding tissue was reduced after ILP treatment with Hi and melphalan compared with melphalan alone. In vitro results paralleled in vivo results. BN-175 tumor cells were more sensitive to the cytotoxicity of combined treatment than HUVECs, and Hi treatment increased the permeability of HUVECs. CONCLUSIONS: Hi in combination with melphalan in ILP improved response to that of melphalan alone through direct and indirect mechanisms. These results warrant further evaluation in the clinical ILP setting and, importantly, in organ perfusion.
The pharmacokinetics and systemic availability of melphalan after high-dose oral administration with and without 1,3-bis(2-Chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) or etoposide were examined in three patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation. Patient 1 (advanced melanoma) received melphalan at 80 mg/m2/day p.o. on days -6, -5, and -4, followed by BCNU at 300 mg/m2/day i.v. on days -3, -2, and -1 prior to bone marrow transplantation. Patient 2 (advanced colon carcinoma) received melphalan at 75 mg/m2/day p.o. on days -3, -2, and -1. Patient 3 (advanced refractory lymphoma) received etoposide at 800 mg/m2/day i.v. on days -7, -5, and -3, followed by melphalan at 157 mg/m2/day p.o. on days -2 and -1. Melphalan was administered as a bolus oral dose, using 2-mg tablets. Blood samples were collected at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 min and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after each dose of melphalan. Peak plasma melphalan concentrations in the three patients ranged from 0.354 (patient 2) to 1.768 micrograms/ml (patient 1). Plasma melphalan concentration X time products (C x Ts) showed extreme variability in one patient (patient 2), ranging from 0.76 to 4.48 micrograms.h/ml. To determine the relative systemic availability of orally administered melphalan, i.v. C X Ts proportional to the p.o. doses were extrapolated from previously reported i.v. bolus pharmacokinetic data. The p.o.:i.v. plasma C X T ratios for high-dose melphalan ranged between 0.09 (patient 3) and 0.58 (patient 2). Although these C X T data suggest a dose-response for orally administered melphalan, the systemic availability of these high p.o. melphalan doses was extremely variable, both within and between study patients. Thus, we cannot recommend the use of high-dose p.o. melphalan regimens in patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation.
We studied the consequences of interfering with DNA topoisomerase IIalpha (topo IIalpha) activity on melphalan-induced cytotoxicity. In order to accomplish our goal we used three different approaches to interfere with topo IIalpha. These include: i) use of three V79 Chinese hamster lung fibroblast-derived mutant cell lines, V507, V511, and V513 that are dysfunctional in topo IIalpha activity; ii) treatment of cells with etoposide (VP-16) which inhibits topo IIalpha through the formation of DNA-enzyme cleavable complex; and iii) exposure of cells to merbarone or ICRF-187 (Zinecard) that inhibits the activity of topo IIalpha by restricting its access to DNA. Based on clonogenic survival assays, all three approaches resulted in a significant potentiation of cytotoxicity of melphalan suggesting that topo IIalpha plays an important role in processing of DNA damage induced by melphalan. Furthermore, using alkaline elution assay, we show that melphalan-induced DNA cross-link formation and its repair is faster in V511 cells compared to the parental V79 cells. However, melphalan-induced sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) are found to be significantly higher in V511 cells compared to V79 cells. In addition, we find an excellent correlation between melphalan-induced SCE and cytotoxicity. These results could be explained on the assumption that topo IIalpha plays an important role in damage processing through excision repair of melphalan-induced DNA cross-links. However, in the absence of topo IIalpha the damages are primarily processed by recombination repair which may be prone to deleterious genetic alterations resulting in increased lethality as the frequency of recombination increases. In summary, our results demonstrate that: i) topo IIalpha deficiency is associated with increased sensitivity to melphalan; ii) deficiency of topo IIalpha is associated with an increase in melphalan-induced SCE; iii) increase in melphalan-induced SCE is associated with an increase in cytotoxicity; and iv) downregulation of topo IIalpha may be a useful approach to modulate the cytotoxicity of melphalan in combination chemotherapy regimens. These results have several important clinical implications. First, interference with topo IIalpha using agents such as VP-16 or ICRF-187 may provide a useful approach to enhance the efficacy of melphalan in combination chemotherapy regimens. Second, tumors which develop resistance to topo IIalpha-directed drugs due to quantitative or qualitative alterations in topo IIalpha may show increased susceptibility to a chemotherapy regimen containing melphalan.