Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “MEPIVACAINE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

A double-blind comparison of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and mepivacaine during sciatic and femoral nerve blockade.

UNLABELLED: No study has evaluated the efficacy of ropivacaine in peripheral nerve block of the lower extremity. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and mepivacaine during combined sciatic-femoral nerve block. Forty-five ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for elective hallux valgus repair with thigh tourniquet were randomized to receive combined sciatic-femoral block with 0.75% ropivacaine (ROPI, n = 15), 0.5% bupivacaine (BUPI, n = 15), and 2% mepivacaine (MEPI, n = 15). Time required for onset of sensory and motor block on the operated limb (readiness for surgery) and resolution of motor block, as well as onset of postsurgical pain and time of first analgesic requirement, were recorded. The three groups were similar with regard to demographic variables, duration of surgery, and measured visual analog pain scores. Onset of sensory and motor blockade was similar in Groups ROPI and MEPI and significantly shorter than in Group BUPI (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively). Resolution of motor block occurred later in Groups ROPI and BUPI than in Group MEPI (P = 0.005 and P = 0.0001, respectively). Duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly longer in Groups ROPI (670+/-227 min) and BUPI (880+/-312 min) compared with Group MEPI (251+/-47 min) (P = 0.0001), with a significant decrease in postoperative pain medication requirements (P < 0.05). We conclude that for sciatic-femoral nerve block, 0.75% ropivacaine has an onset similar to that of 2% mepivacaine and a duration of postoperative analgesia between that of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% mepivacaine. IMPLICATIONS: Quick onset of block with prolonged postoperative analgesia is an important goal in peripheral nerve blockade. We evaluated the clinical properties of 0.5% bupivacaine, 2% mepivacaine, and 0.75% ropivacaine for sciatic-femoral nerve block and demonstrated that ropivacaine has an onset similar to that of mepivacaine but allows for postoperative analgesia between that of bupivacaine and mepivacaine.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with mepivacaine and lidocaine.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia with lidocaine is ideal for ambulatory surgery because of its short duration of action. However, transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) occur in 0-40% of patients. The incidence of TNS with mepivacaine, which has a similar duration of action, is unknown. METHODS: Sixty ambulatory patients undergoing knee arthroscopy received spinal anesthesia in a randomized, double-blinded manner, with either 45 mg 1.5% mepivacaine or 60 mg 2% lidocaine. An L3-L4 midline approach was used with a 27-gauge Whitacre needle and a 20-gauge introducer. The local anesthetic was injected over approximately 30 s with the aperture of the Whitacre needle in a cephalad direction. Two to 4 days after operation, each patient was questioned about the development of TNS. In addition, the two groups were compared for time to regression of sensory and motor blockade and time to discharge milestones. RESULTS: Three patients receiving lidocaine were lost to follow-up. None of the 30 patients in the mepivacaine group developed TNS, whereas 6 of 27 (22%) in the lidocaine group did (P = 0.008). Time to regression to the L5 sensory level and to complete resolution of motor block were similar in both groups. The times to discharge milestones were also comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TNS is greater with 2% lidocaine than with 1.5% mepivacaine for patients having unilateral knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia. Mepivacaine seems to be a promising alternative to lidocaine for outpatient surgical procedures because of its similar duration of action. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal dose of intrathecal mepivacaine for ambulatory surgery and the incidence of TNS with other doses and concentrations of intrathecal mepivacaine.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Ropivacaine or 2% mepivacaine for lower limb peripheral nerve blocks. Study Group on Orthopedic Anesthesia of the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, and Intensive Care.

BACKGROUND: Intra- and postoperative clinical properties of sciatic-femoral nerve block performed with either ropivacaine at different concentrations or mepivacaine have been evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, blinded study. METHODS: Adult patients scheduled for foot and ankle surgery were randomized to receive combined sciatic-femoral nerve block with 225 mg of either 0.5% (n = 83), 0.75% (n = 87), or 1% (n = 86) ropivacaine, or with 500 mg of 2% mepivacaine (n = 84). A thigh tourniquet was used in all patients. Onset time, adequacy of surgical anesthesia, time to offset of nerve block, and time until first postoperative requirement for pain medication were evaluated by a blinded observer. RESULTS: The adequacy of nerve block was similar in the four treatment groups (the ratios between adequate:inadequate: failed blocks were 74:9:0 with 0.5% ropivacaine, 74:13:0 with 0.75% ropivacaine, 78:8:0 with 1% ropivacaine, and 72:12:0 with 2% mepivacaine). The onset of the block was slower with 0.5% ropivacaine than with other anesthetic solutions (P < 0.001). Regardless of the concentration, ropivacaine produced a longer motor blockade (10.5+/-3.8 h, 10.3+/-4.3 h, and 10.2+/-5.1 h with 0.5%, 0.75%, and 1% ropivacaine, respectively) than with mepivacaine (4.3+/-2.6 h; P < 0.001). The duration of postoperative analgesia was shorter after mepivacaine (5.1+/-2.7 h) than after ropivacaine (12.2+/-4.1 h, 14.3+/-5 h, and 14.5+/-3.4 h, with 0.5%, 0.75%, or 1% ropivacaine, respectively; P < 0.001). Pain relief after 0.5% ropivacaine was 14% shorter than 0.75% or 1% ropivacaine (P < 0.05). During the first 24 h after surgery, 30-37% of patients receiving ropivacaine required no analgesics compared with 10% of those receiving mepivacaine (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that 0.75% ropivacaine is the most suitable choice of local anesthetic for combined sciatic-femoral nerve block, providing an onset similar to mepivacaine and prolonged postoperative analgesia.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Procaine and mepivacaine have less toxicity in vitro than other clinically used local anesthetics.

UNLABELLED: The neurotoxicity of local anesthetics can be demonstrated in vitro by the collapse of growth cones and neurites in cultured neurons. We compared the neurotoxicity of procaine, mepivacaine, ropivacaine, bupivacaine, lidocaine, tetracaine, and dibucaine by using cultured neurons from the freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis. A solution of local anesthetics was added to the culture dish to make final concentrations ranging from 1 x 10(-6) to 2 x 10(-2) M. Morphological changes in the growth cones and neurites were observed and graded 1 (moderate) or 2 (severe). The median concentrations yielding a score of 1 were 5 x 10(-4) M for procaine, 5 x 10(-4) M for mepivacaine, 2 x 10(-4) M for ropivacaine, 2 x 10(-4) M for bupivacaine, 1 x 10(-4) M for lidocaine, 5 x 10(-5) M for tetracaine, and 2 x 10(-5) M for dibucaine. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed between mepivacaine and ropivacaine, bupivacaine and lidocaine, lidocaine and tetracaine, and tetracaine and dibucaine. The order of neurotoxicity was procaine = mepivacaine < ropivacaine = bupivacaine < lidocaine < tetracaine < dibucaine. Although lidocaine is more toxic than bupivacaine and ropivacaine, mepivacaine, which has a similar pharmacological effect to lidocaine, has the least-adverse effects on cone growth among clinically used local anesthetics. IMPLICATIONS: Systematic comparison was assessed morphologically in growth cones and neurites exposed to seven local anesthetics. The order of neurotoxicity was procaine = mepivacaine < ropivacaine = bupivacaine < lidocaine < tetracaine < dibucaine. Although lidocaine is more toxic than bupivacaine and ropivacaine, mepivacaine, which has a similar pharmacological effect to lidocaine, is the safest among clinically used local anesthetics.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed2003

Neurotrophic factors can partially reverse morphological changes induced by mepivacaine and bupivacaine in developing sensory neurons.

UNLABELLED: Both bupivacaine and mepivacaine induce morphological changes in growing neurons. We designed this study to investigate the role of some neurotrophic factors (NTFs) in supporting developing neurons exposed to the deleterious effects of these drugs. Dorsal root ganglia were isolated from chick embryos and exposed to either bupivacaine or mepivacaine. After 60 min of exposure, the culture media were replaced with fresh culture media free from local anesthetics. NTFs-brain-derived NTF, glial-derived NTF, or neurotrophin-3-were added to the replacement media, and the cells were examined up to 48 h after the washout. The growth cone collapse assay was applied by a quantitative method of assessment. When the replacement media were not supported by any NTF, the growth cone collapse values were significantly larger than the control values at 20 h after the washout of mepivacaine and 48 h after the washout of either bupivacaine or mepivacaine (P < 0.05). However, when any of the NTFs were used, the collapsing activity was significantly attenuated, and growth cone collapse values showed no statistically significant differences in comparison with the control values at these time points (P > 0.05). We conclude that several NTFs support the recovery of neurons after exposure to local anesthetics. The supporting effects of NTFs on the reversibility of mepivacaine-induced collapse tended to be more obvious than those seen after the bupivacaine washout. IMPLICATIONS: Three neurotrophic factors (NTFs) can partially support the reversibility of mepivacaine- and bupivacaine-induced growth cone collapse in growing primary cultured sensory neurons. The effect of NTFs is more apparent after mepivacaine than after bupivacaine washout.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed1991

Fentanyl in 2% mepivacaine compared with fentanyl in 0.5% bupivacaine: two parallel controlled double blind studies.

The efficacy of epidural mepivacaine and bupivacaine, combined with fentanyl to enhance blockade, was compared in two parallel controlled, double-blind clinical trials. Patients in the studies (n = 91) were scheduled for orthopedic surgery of the legs and a tourniquet was used in all cases. Those patients receiving mepivacaine attended day surgery only, whereas patients receiving bupivacaine were hospitalised. Epidural puncture was performed with a Tuohy needle at the L3-4 level in the lateral decubitus position. Levels of sensory and motor blockade were assessed; adverse reactions and pain during surgery were recorded. There were four groups of patients: 1) 26 received 2% mepivacaine with placebo; 2) 26 received 2% mepivacaine with 0.1 mg fentanyl; 3) 19 received 0.5% bupivacaine with placebo and 4) 20 patients received 0.5% bupivacaine with 0.1 mg fentanyl. The levels of the sensory blockade was comparable in all groups. The degree of motor-blockade was more intense in the mepivacaine groups, but the blockade by mepivacaine lasted shorter. Addition of fentanyl did not change the sensory and motor blockade. Intraoperative pain was reported by: 7 patients in the mepivacaine/placebo group; 4 patients in the mepivacaine/fentanyl group; 4 patients in the bupivacaine/placebo group; and by one patient in the bupivacaine/fentanyl group. These results indicate that fentanyl enhances the quality of epidural blockade when combined with either mepivacaine or bupivacaine.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Serum levels of mepivacaine-HCl during continuous axillary brachial plexus block.

In order to find out whether repeated doses of plain mepivacaine are appropriate for long-lasting microvascular surgery, a catheter-induced axillary plexus block was performed in 17 patients by using 400 mg of mepivacaine-HC1 every two hours. All patients underwent replantation surgery of one or more amputated fingers. Duration of operation varied from 8 to 24 hours. In all cases, there was adequate analgesia and muscle relaxation for the surgical procedure. Serum levels of mepivacaine were determined before, and 15 and 60 minute after the initial injection. With each following injection of mepivacaine, blood samples were taken at the same time schedule. Within the first eight hours, after four 400 mg doses of mepivacaine were given, all serum levels remained below the level of 5 to 6 micrograms/ml, which is said to be the lower level for mild cerebral toxic reactions in venous blood (blood/plasma distribution 0.92 +/- 0.04). After this time, when more than 1600 mg of mepivacaine had been administered, two patients exceeded the level of 6 micrograms/ml. The highest serum concentration observed in any of the patients was 7.0 micrograms/ml. This was 15 minutes after the 12th injection of 400 mg of mepivacaine and an overall dosage of 4800 mg. None of the patients showed evident signs of central nervous system or cardiovascular toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

[Local anesthetic level and cardiovascular changes following local anesthesia in cataract operations with 3% mepivacaine].

Are there toxic plasma levels of mepivacaine after local anesthesia for ophthalmic surgery with 3% mepivacaine? What hemodynamic changes occur during injection of the local anesthetics? Fifteen patients undergoing cataract surgery were given 10 ml of mepivacaine (3%) as a local anesthetic regardless of body weight. After inserting an arterial line, blood samples were taken before the beginning of the injection of mepivacaine and after 3, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 min. Concentrations of the drug were measured by gas chromatography. During the first 15 min arterial blood pressure and ECG were registered continuously on a multichannel recorder. The maximum mepivacaine plasma levels were estimated after 15 min with a range from 0.28 to 6.95 micrograms/ml (means +/- SD: 4.5 +/- 1.47 micrograms/ml). The blood pressure was elevated over the preoperative value, at the beginning of the evaluation period, but there was no change in the blood-pressure level over the whole period. In 4 patients without known cardiac arrhythmias, ventricular or supraventricular extrasystoles occurred. The mepivacaine plasma levels complied with resorption kinetics, which is an indication that there were few intravascular injections and that the injection technique war correct. On the other hand, in some patients the mepivacaine plasma levels exceeded the toxic level. Even in ophthalmic surgery, local anesthetics should be given in relation to the body weight of the patients. The high blood-pressure levels indicated non-optimal preoperative treatment of the hypertonic patients, which was followed by an intraoperative exacerbation of the blood pressure.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Diluting lidocaine and mepivacaine in balanced salt solution reduces the pain of intradermal injection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intradermal injection of local anesthetics prior to percutaneous needle insertion is often painful. This study evaluated the effect of diluting lidocaine and mepivacaine with balanced salt solution on perception of pain on intradermal injection. METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers were each intradermally injected with six solutions in random order. These solutions were: normal saline (NS), 0.9% benzyl alcohol in NS, 0.2% lidocaine in NS, 0.2% lidocaine in balanced salt solution, 0.2% mepivacaine in NS, and 0.2% mepivacaine in balanced salt solution. Discomfort of each injection was reported on a 0-2 pain scale. The degree of anesthesia at each site was evaluated by pinprick every minute for 20 minutes. RESULTS: Benzyl alcohol and lidocaine and mepivacaine in balanced salt solution caused the least injection pain. However, mepivacaine in NS and NS alone caused the most pain. The anesthetic effect of benzyl alcohol was judged adequate for only 4 minutes whereas both lidocaine and mepivacaine in either NS or balanced salt solution gave adequate anesthesia for at least 15 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The dilution of lidocaine and mepivacaine with balanced salt solution produces a solution that is both painless on injection and of moderate duration.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Cervical plexus anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: comparison of ropivacaine and mepivacaine.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of cervical plexus block performed with ropivacaine 0.75% or 1%, or mepivacaine 2%. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 60 patients received deep cervical plexus block with 0.2 ml x kg(-1) divided among C2-C4 injections using ropivacaine 0.75% and 1% or mepivacaine 2%. A blinded observer recorded loss of pin-prick sensation every minute in the C2-C4 dermatomes until readiness for surgery. Then, a superficial cervical block was performed with 0.15 ml x kg(-1) lidocaine 1%. The need for intraoperative supplemental analgesia and degree of pain and time of first postoperative pain medication were also recorded. RESULTS: General anesthesia was not required to complete surgery in any case. No differences in the need for intraoperative supplemental analgesia was observed (7, 6, and 9 patients with ropivacaine 0.75% and 1% or mepivacaine 2%, respectively). Readiness to surgery required 15 (10-25) min with ropivacaine 0.75%, 18 (8-20) min with ropivacaine 1%, and 15 (5-20) min with mepivacaine 2% (P = NS); while patients asked for first postoperative pain medication after 10 (4-13) hr and 9 (6.5 - 11) hr with ropivacaine 0.75% and 1% compared with 5 (0-8) hr with mepivacaine 2% (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine 0.75% or 1% are appropriate choices when performing cervical plexus anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy, providing nerve block characteristics similar to those of mepivacaine 2%, but with the advantage of longer postoperative pain relief.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Pediatric caudal block with mepivacaine, bupivacaine or a mixture of both drugs: requirement for postoperative analgesia and plasma concentration of local anesthetics.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of pediatric caudal block using mepivacaine, bupivacaine, or a mixture of both drugs on postoperative analgesia, and to examine plasma concentrations of the local anesthetics after caudal injection. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: Operating room and pediatric surgical ward. PATIENTS: 60 ASA physical status I children weighing 10 to 20 kg (26 females, 34 males), and scheduled for inguinal herniorrhaphy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients randomly received caudal block with 1 mL/kg of mepivacaine 1% (Group M, n = 20), 1 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% (Group B, n = 20), or a mixture of 0.5 mL/kg of mepivacaine 1% and 0.5 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% (Group MB, n = 20) after induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane in 50% oxygen (O2). Anesthesia was maintained with 66% nitrous oxide in O2 supplemented with sevoflurane at an end-tidal concentration of less than 1%. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Postoperative pain scores using a pediatric pain scale and plasma concentration of each local anesthetic were measured. In Group M, four patients required postoperative analgesics within the first 24 hours. However, no patients required postoperative analgesics in Groups B and MB. In Group M, the plasma concentration of mepivacaine of two patients exceeded 5 microg/kg of the level of toxicity. However, these patients did not show any toxic symptoms. Because a mixture of two local anesthetics halves the concentration of each local anesthetic, the plasma concentrations of mepivacaine and bupivacaine in Group MB were significantly lower than those of Groups M and B. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric caudal block with a mixture of mepivacaine and bupivacaine is effective for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1984

Influence of bupivacaine on mepivacaine protein binding.

To elucidate the mechanism of any drug displacement interaction, we examined the protein binding of mixtures of mepivacaine and bupivacaine in serum and solutions of albumin or alpha 1-acid glycoprotein. Protein binding data with mepivacaine alone were best described by a model with one class of binding site and a partitioning constant in serum and by a model with one class of binding site in both isolated protein solutions. Binding affinity of mepivacaine in serum was reduced in the presence of bupivacaine. Displacement of mepivacaine by bupivacaine was observed when an alpha 1-acid glycoprotein solution was studied. Classic competitive inhibition was demonstrated. Bupivacaine reduced mepivacaine binding to albumin, but the degree of displacement was not significant. When administered simultaneously, these two amino-amide local anesthetics interact synergistically to produce a higher than expected free concentration of mepivacaine. This interaction increases the risk of toxicity.

Binding, Competitive↗
PubMed2001

Long-term absence of sensitization to mepivacaine as assessed by a diagnostic protocol including patch testing.

BACKGROUND: Prospective assessment of non-reactivity to local anaesthetics is a frequent reason for allergy consultation. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical profiles of subjects referred for allergy evaluation; to prospectively reduce the frequency of evaluation by assessing the persistence, during clinical use, of non-reactivity to contaminant/additive-free mepivacaine; and to determine the usefulness of a diagnostic protocol involving patch testing. METHODS: In a prospective study, 198 consecutive patients underwent collection of clinical data, skin prick tests and patch tests using allergens/antigens relevant for the investigation, and an intradermal/subcutaneous challenge procedure using contaminant/additive-free mepivacaine, as appropriate. Patients were followed up for 3 years for assessment of non-reactivity persistence using the same diagnostic protocol. RESULTS: Only one-third of the patients had a history of previous adverse local anaesthetic reactions. Absence of sensitization to contaminant/additive-free mepivacaine persisted in all subjects completing the follow-up. Controlled challenge with mepivacaine was negative in 196 patients with both negative specific skin prick tests and patch tests but it was eventful in two subjects with positive specific patch tests. A few subjects displayed positive skin prick tests and/or patch tests for latex and/or additives. CONCLUSIONS: A few patients had a relevant history for potential local anaesthetic-induced adverse reactions. Upon assessment of absence of sensitization and reactivity, contaminant/additive-free mepivacaine could safely be given for as long as 3 years. The patch testing was shown to be useful and safe for prediction of challenge outcomes. True allergic reactions to contaminant/additive-free mepivacaine were not observed in our patient series.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Mepivacaine for spinal anesthesia in parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery: maternal and neonatal plasma concentrations and neonatal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Worldwide, long-acting bupivacaine is most commonly used for spinal anesthesia in parturients undergoing elective Cesarean delivery. However, advances in surgical technique and shorter duration of surgery make short-acting local anesthetic like mepivacaine appropriate, particularly if combined with opioids to enhance postoperative maternal pain relief. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We assessed the effect of 4% hyperbaric mepivacaine (60 mg) plus 10 microg fentanyl for spinal anesthesia in 11 parturients undergoing elective Cesarean delivery. Sensory, motor and analgesic block characteristics, neonatal outcome (Apgar scores, umbilical cord blood analysis, neurologic and adaptive capacity score) as well as fetal and maternal mepivacaine plasma concentrations at delivery were determined (HPLC/UV). RESULTS: Motor block (Induction-Bromage 0) duration lasted 113 +/- 20 min. Effective analgesia (VAS < or = 40) was 128 +/- 35 min. Maternal and fetal mepivacaine free plasma concentration were 0.18 +/- 0.05 microg/ml and 0.10 +/- 0.03 microg/ml, respectively. The fetal to maternal (UV/MV)-ratio for mepivacaine free plasma concentration was 0.56. Apgar scores, NACScores and the umbilical blood analysis showed no evidence of neonatal depression. CONCLUSIONS: Particularly with short duration of surgery (21 +/- 5 min) intrathecal mepivacaine combined with fentanyl offers a favorable clinical alternative in parturients undergoing elective Cesarean delivery.

Anesthesia, Spinal↗
PubMed2002

Mediating transurethral microwave thermotherapy by intraprostatic and periprostatic injections of mepivacaine epinephrine: effects on treatment time, energy consumption, and patient comfort.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Profound intraprostatic blood flow may complicate reaching a therapeutic temperature in the prostate during transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A retrospective survey is presented describing the effect of intraprostatic and periprostatic administration of mepivacaine epinephrine on treatment time, intraprostatic blood flow, energy delivery, and patient comfort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen consecutive obstructed patients with lower urinary tract symptoms attributable to BPH received TUMT (ProstaLund Feedback Treatment). In order to improve patient comfort, injections of 10 mL of 0.5% mepivacaine epinephrine were administered in three locations into the prostate prior to treatment. The results were compared with those of a reference group consisting of 35 consecutive patients who had received ProstaLund Feedback Treatment without administration of mepivacaine epinephrine. RESULTS: Patients who received intraprostatic mepivacaine epinephrine had a shorter treatment time (32+/-9 minutes v 61+/-6 minutes), required less energy (65+/-27 kJ v 172+/-32 kJ), and had a lower calculated intraprostatic blood flow (13+/-5 units/minute v 26+/-12 units/minute) than the reference group. Patients receiving mepivacaine epinephrine also required less analgesic medication during the treatment. The clinical outcome in terms of symptom scores and peak uroflow rates appeared to be similar for the two groups. CONCLUSION: Intraprostatic injection of mepivacaine epinephrine prior to TUMT seems to have beneficial effects. It may represent an important improvement of thermotherapy and enable successful treatment of those patients who previously failed secondary to a profound intraprostatic blood flow.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed2004

Effects of intraprostatic and periprostatic injections of mepivacaine epinephrine on intraprostatic blood flow during transurethral microwave thermotherapy: correlation with [15O]H2O-PET.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Experiences with the ProstaLund Feedback Treatment (PLFT) with the CoreTherm device and results from a previous positron emission tomography (PET) study suggest that the intraprostatic blood flow increases considerably during treatment in response to heat exposure. Early results with intraprostatic injection of mepivacaine epinephrine prior to PLFT have indicated greater patient comfort during treatment and shorter treatment time secondary to lower intraprostatic blood flow. In this pilot study, the effect of intraprostatic injection of mepivacaine epinephrine on intraprostatic blood flow before and during PLFT was evaluated by PET using [15O]H2O. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In four patients scheduled for PLFT, a baseline value of the intraprostatic blood flow was established using [15O]H2O-PET. Thereafter, intraprostatic injections of mepivacaine epinephrine were given using a prototype of the Schelin Catheter. In two of the patients, PET was performed immediately after the mepivacaine epinephrine injections and 10 and 24 minutes after the start of PLFT. To reduce the risk of wash-out of the drug, the next two patients were examined 7 and 17 minutes after the start of PLFT but not in connection with the anethetic injection. RESULTS: In patients 1 and 2, mepivacaine epinephrine decreased the prostatic blood flow. During PLFT, there was a slight increase in blood flow in patient 1 and a more pronounced increase in patient 2. In patient 3, the blood flow during treatment was almost unchanged, while it decreased in patient 4. CONCLUSIONS: Intraprostatic injection of mepivacaine epinephrine may reduce, or even eliminate, the increase in blood flow that is usually seen during PLFT. The vague effect seen in patients 1 and 2 may be explained by wash-out of the drug.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Continuous brachial plexus infusion of butorphanol-mepivacaine mixtures for analgesia after upper extremity surgery.

We have recently reported that continuous administration of butorphanol into the brachial plexus neurovascular sheath provided superior analgesia compared with that obtained with continuous i.v. administration. Furthermore, we found that analgesia was most pronounced when a mixture of mepivacaine and butorphanol was given and that butorphanol alone ranked next. In this study, we increased the dose of butorphanol, compared with that used in our previous reports, and an initial bolus dose of butorphanol was administered into the brachial plexus neurovascular sheath just after surgery had ended. Thereafter, postoperative pain relief was estimated. In patients undergoing upper extremity surgery with continuous axillary brachial plexus block, group A received a bolus of 1 ml of physiological saline with 1.5% mepivacaine, 10 ml into the brachial plexus sheath followed by a continuous brachial plexus infusion of 0.5% mepivacaine with butorphanol 6 mg at a rate of 144 ml/ 72 h. Group B was given a bolus of butorphanol 1 mg (1 ml) with 1.5% mepivacaine, 10 ml into the brachial plexus sheath and a continuous brachial plexus infusion of 0.5% mepivacaine with butorphanol 6 mg at a rate of 144 ml/72 h. After operation, VAS scores did not differ between the two groups. The time to first use of supplementary analgesia did not differ significantly between the two groups and there were no significant differences in the number of patients who required supplementary analgesia. These results indicate that continuous butorphanol 2 mg day-1 with 0.5% mepivacaine provided sufficient postoperative analgesia after upper limb surgery.

Analgesia↗
PubMed2000

The anesthetic and recovery profile of two doses (60 and 80 mg) of plain mepivacaine for ambulatory spinal anesthesia.

UNLABELLED: Reports of transient neurological symptoms with the use of subarachnoid lidocaine has generated interest in alternate local anesthetics of intermediate duration, such as mepivacaine. This prospective randomized, double-blinded, dose-response study examined the anesthetic and recovery profiles of 60- and 80-mg doses of preservative-free plain mepivacaine for ambulatory spinal anesthesia. Sixty patients undergoing ambulatory anterior cruciate ligament repair of the knee under spinal anesthesia were randomized into two groups; Group 1 (29 patients) received 4 mL of 1.5% (60-mg dose) and Group 2 (31 patients) received 4 mL of 2% (80-mg dose) of plain mepivacaine. All patients received a combined spinal-epidural anesthetic technique. The epidural catheter was used only in the event the surgery outlasted the duration of surgical anesthesia with subarachnoid mepivacaine. Epidural supplementation was administered in three patients (12%) in Group 1 and one patient (3%) in Group 2 when the sensory block regressed to L-1 with surgery expected to last longer than 15 min. The cephalad dermatome level of the block and degree of motor block was comparable in the two groups. Times to two-segment and T-10 regression were comparable in the two groups (112 +/- 26 min in Group 1 versus 122 +/- 28 min in Group 2). Time to L-1 regression was significantly longer in Group 2 (146 +/- 28 min in Group 1 versus 159 +/- 19 min in Group 2). All of the ambulatory milestones were significantly faster in Group 1. Side effects, such as hypotension and emesis were negligible, severe bradycardia and urinary retention did not occur, and none of the patients in the two groups reported transient neurological symptoms over 24 h. In conclusion, plain mepivacaine in a 60- or 80-mg dose is a suitable local anesthetic choice for ambulatory spinal anesthesia with respect to anesthetic, as well as recovery profiles. IMPLICATIONS: We evaluated the anesthetic and recovery profiles of 60- and 80-mg doses of plain mepivacaine for ambulatory spinal anesthesia. Both doses produced comparable sensory and motor block. Sensory and motor regression and ambulatory milestones were 20-30 min longer with the 80-mg dose. Side effects were negligible and transient neurological symptoms were not reported during a 24-h follow-up.

Adolescent↗