Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Local Lymph Node Assay”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of a local lymph node assay based on ex vivo interleukin-2 production.

The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a regular method for the detection of sensitizing chemicals in mice which measures the incorporation of tritiated thymidine in lymph node cells. We have evaluated an alternative to this method based on the interleukin-2 (IL-2) production of lymph node cells. At the mRNA level, no change in the IL-2 gene expression level was detected by real-time PCR analysis. At the protein level, various experimental conditions were checked in order to improve the irritant versus sensitizer discrimination with a restricted set of prototypic compounds. In particular, the use of phytohemagglutinin A (PHA) in an ex vivo cell culture step showed an improvement of both signal and discrimination. In these optimised conditions, a panel of irritants and potency-graded sensitizers was used to assess the performance of the modified method. IFN-gamma production was used as a positive control. For each compound, a dose-response was performed and stimulation indexes (SI) were determined. Effective concentrations (EC) for each sensitizers were then extracted and compared to the literature data of the regular LLNA. The IL-2-based LLNA showed similar performances at both qualitative and quantitative levels compared to regular LLNA.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗
PubMed1994

Experience with the murine local lymph node assay: inability to discriminate between allergens and irritants.

The murine local lymph node assay is a new predictive test for identifying contact sensitizers. It measures the proliferative response in the lymph nodes during the sensitization phase. In the present study, moderate-to-extreme allergens (from human and guinea pig experience) gave clearly positive results in this assay. However, irritants tested, i.e. sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), chloroform/methanol, oxalic acid, triton X-100 and methylsalicylate, also gave positive results, not distinguishable from the results with low-grade/moderate allergens. Two allergens were also tested in the presence of 10% SDS. The effect on proliferation was additive in the first case and synergistic in the second. The local lymph node assay in its present design and with the criteria used for a positive response requires further validation studies and perhaps further development before it can be accepted as an alternative to guinea pig tests for allergenicity. Substances with exclusively irritating properties could falsely be classified as allergens by the method or, alternatively, the allergenicity of chemicals with both allergenic and irritating properties could be overestimated.

Allergens↗
PubMed2003

Utility of historical vehicle-control data in the interpretation of the local lymph node assay.

The accepted approach to the interpretation of local lymph node assay (LLNA) data requires comparison of responses in the test groups with background activity found in concurrent vehicle-treated controls. However, of established value in the interpretation of toxicity test data is the use of historical control values that provide one criterion against which to judge the integrity of individual experiments. Specifically, the availability of robust and relevant historical control data permits examination of whether, in any individual experiment, control values fall within the expected range. With the most commonly used vehicle employed in the LLNA, acetone/olive oil (4 : 1) (v/v), the mean values, standard deviations and normal ranges are increasingly well established for a given laboratory, although there is some variation between laboratories, particularly with regard to expected ranges. Against this background, it is possible to identify (and, if appropriate, eliminate) a concurrent vehicle-control value that falls well outside the expected range. To explore critically the potential merits of this approach, one specific example is examined in detail.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial.

The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method used for the prospective identification in mice of chemicals that have the potential to cause skin sensitization. We report here the results of the second and final phase of an international trial in which the performance of the assay has been evaluated using seven test materials in five independent laboratories. The additional chemicals examined here included compounds which are considered less potent allergens than some of those tested in the first phase of the investigation, and includes hexylcinnamic aldehyde (HCA), a chemical recommended by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as a positive control for skin sensitization studies. In each laboratory all skin sensitizing chemicals examined (2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene {DNCB}, HCA, oxazolone, isoeugenal and eugenol) elicited positive responses of comparable magnitude as judged by the derived lowest concentration of test chemical required to elicit a 3-fold or greater increase in the proliferative activity of draining lymph node cells compared with vehicle-treated controls. We observed that sodium lauryl sulphate, considered to be a non-sensitizing skin irritant, also induced a positive response in the assay. Para-aminobenzoic acid (pABA), a nonsensitizing chemical, was negative at all test concentrations in each laboratory. Some laboratories incorporated minor modifications into the standard assay procedure, including the evaluation of lymph nodes pooled from individual mice rather than treatment groups and the use of statistical analyses. The use of statistics did not markedly change the determination of the lowest concentration yielding a positive response. These data confirm that the local lymph node assay is robust and yields equivalent results when performed independently.

Animals↗
PubMed2007

Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.

The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a murine model developed to evaluate the skin sensitization potential of chemicals. The LLNA is an alternative approach to traditional guinea pig methods and in comparison provides important animal welfare benefits. The assay relies on measurement of events induced during the induction phase of skin sensitization, specifically lymphocyte proliferation in the draining lymph nodes which is a hallmark of a skin sensitization response. Since its introduction the LLNA has been the subject of extensive evaluation on a national and international scale, and has been successfully validated and incorporated worldwide into regulatory guidelines. Experience gained in recent years has demonstrated that adherence to published procedures and guidelines for the LLNA (e.g., with respect to dose and vehicle selection) is critical for the successful conduct and eventual interpretation of the data. In addition to providing a robust method for skin sensitization hazard identification, the LLNA has proven very useful in assessing the skin sensitizing potency of test chemicals, and this has provided invaluable information to risk assessors. The primary method to make comparisons of the relative potency of chemical sensitizers is to use linear interpolation to estimate the concentration of chemical required to induce a stimulation index of three relative to concurrent vehicle-treated controls (EC3). In certain situations where there are available less than optimal dose response data a log-linear extrapolation method can be used to estimate an EC3 value which can reduce significantly the need for repeat testing of chemicals. The LLNA, when conducted according to published guidelines, provides a robust method for skin sensitization testing that not only provides reliable hazard identification information but also data necessary for effective risk assessment and risk management.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

An European inter-laboratory validation of alternative endpoints of the murine local lymph node assay: first round.

The new OECD guideline 429 (skin sensitization: local lymph node assay) is based upon a protocol, which utilises the incorporation of radioactivity into DNA as a measure for cell proliferation in vivo. The guideline also enables the use of alternative endpoints in order to assess draining lymph node (LN) cell proliferation. Here we describe the first round of an inter-laboratory validation of alternative endpoints in the LLNA conducted in seven laboratories. The validation study was managed and supervised by the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products, Swissmedic. Statistical analyses of all data were performed by an independent centre at the University of Bern, Department of Statistics. Ear-draining, LN weight and cell count were used to assess proliferation instead of radioactive labeling of lymph node cells. In addition, the acute inflammatory skin reaction was measured by ear swelling and weight of circular biopsies of the ears to identify skin irritating properties of the test items. Hexylcinnamaldehyde (HCA) and three blinded test items were applied to female, 8--10 weeks old NMRI and BALB/c mice. Results were sent via the independent study coordinator to the statistician. The results of this first round showed that the alternative endpoints of the LLNA are sensitive and robust parameters. The use of ear weights added an important parameter assessing the skin irritation potential, which supports the differentiation of pure irritative from contact allergenic potential. There were absolute no discrepancies between the categorisation of the three test substances A--C determined by each single participating laboratories. The results highlighted also that many parameters do have an impact on the strength of the responses. Therefore, such parameters have to be taken into consideration for the categorisation of compounds due to their relative sensitizing potencies.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Local lymph node assay: use in hazard and risk assessment.

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) was developed as an alternative method for the identification of chemicals that have the ability to cause skin sensitization and allergic contact dermatitis. The assay now has been evaluated extensively in the context of both national and international inter-laboratory collaborative trials and has been the subject of detailed comparisons with guinea pig test methods and human skin sensitization data. On the basis of these evaluations the LLNA has been endorsed recently by the US Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) as a stand-alone method for skin sensitization testing. The assay offers a number of important benefits compared with conventional guinea pig test methods, among these being provision of an objective and quantitative endpoint. Moreover, the LLNA provides advantages in the context of animal welfare; compared with guinea pig tests, fewer animals are required and these animals are subject to less trauma. It is important now that the validation status of the LLNA is recognized and the method applied widely so that these advantages may be realized. Hazard identification represents only the first step in the risk assessment process. A full toxicological evaluation of skin sensitization activity requires an understanding of relative potency. Guinea pig methods do not lend themselves readily to assessment of potency, and interest recently has focused on the utility of the LLNA for this purpose. Contained within this review article are brief descriptions of the history of the LLNA and the immunobiological basis for the method, together with detailed accounts of the conduct and interpretation of the assay. Procedural modifications to, and alternative endpoints for, the LLNA are considered also. Finally, the current regulatory status of the LLNA is summarized and the application of the method for the purposes of defining relative potency and developing risk assessments is reviewed.

Allergens↗
PubMed2001

The local lymph node assay and potential application to the identification of drug allergens.

The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method for the identification of skin sensitization hazard. The method is based upon measurement of proliferative responses induced in draining lymph nodes following topical exposure of mice to the test chemical. More recently the LLNA has also been used for the evaluation of relative skin sensitization potency in the context of risk assessment. Idiosyncratic drug reactions resulting from the stimulation of allergic or autoimmunogenic responses are poorly understood but represent an important clinical problem. In this article, the potential utility of the LLNA, either in a conventional modified configuration, to provide information of value in assessment the potential for systemic allergenicity is considered.

Allergens↗
PubMed2003

Assessment of statistic analysis in non-radioisotopic local lymph node assay (non-RI-LLNA) with alpha-hexylcinnamic aldehyde as an example.

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is used for the identification of chemicals that have the potential to cause skin sensitization. However, it requires specific facility and handling procedures to accommodate a radioisotopic (RI) endpoint. We have developed non-radioisotopic (non-RI) endpoint of LLNA based on BrdU incorporation to avoid a use of RI. Although this alternative method appears viable in principle, it is somewhat less sensitive than the standard assay. In this study, we report investigations to determine the use of statistical analysis to improve the sensitivity of a non-RI LLNA procedure with alpha-hexylcinnamic aldehyde (HCA) in two separate experiments. Consequently, the alternative non-RI method required HCA concentrations of greater than 25% to elicit a positive response based on the criterion for classification as a skin sensitizer in the standard LLNA. Nevertheless, dose responses to HCA in the alternative method were consistent in both experiments and we examined whether the use of an endpoint based upon the statistical significance of induced changes in LNC turnover, rather than an SI of 3 or greater, might provide for additional sensitivity. The results reported here demonstrate that with HCA at least significant responses were, in each of two experiments, recorded following exposure of mice to 25% of HCA. These data suggest that this approach may be more satisfactory-at least when BrdU incorporation is measured. However, this modification of the LLNA is rather less sensitive than the standard method if employing statistical endpoint. Taken together the data reported here suggest that a modified LLNA in which BrdU is used in place of radioisotope incorporation shows some promise, but that in its present form, even with the use of a statistical endpoint, lacks some of the sensitivity of the standard method. The challenge is to develop strategies for further refinement of this approach.

Acrolein↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cytokine endpoints for the local lymph node assay: consideration of interferon-gamma and interleukin 12.

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method for the prospective identification of contact allergens. Skin sensitization potential is assessed as a function of induced proliferative responses in lymph nodes draining the site of topical exposure measured in situ by incorporation of radiolabelled thymidine ([3H]thymidine). The results of previous investigations have demonstrated that the analysis of [3H]thymidine incorporation represents a robust and reliable endpoint for the LLNA for the assessment of skin sensitizing activity for strong and moderate allergens and, in addition, many weaker sensitizers. The aim of the current experiments was to explore the utility of the production of the cytokines interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and interleukin 12 (IL-12) by draining lymph node cells (LNC) as alternative readouts for the LLNA. Animals were exposed to a range of skin sensitizers at two application concentrations. The first of these was chosen on the basis of results from previous investigations to stimulate a strong proliferative response (tenfold or greater increase in proliferation compared with concurrent vehicle controls). The second concentration of test material in each case was the amount of chemical estimated to be necessary mathematically for elicitation of a stimulation index of 3 (EC3 value); the induction of a threefold or greater increase in proliferation is the current criterion for a positive response in the LLNA. In addition, analyses were conducted with para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA), a non-sensitizing chemical shown previously not to induce LLNA responses. Secretion of IFN-gamma and the p40 subunit of IL-12 by draining LNC was measured by cytokine-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In parallel experiments, LNC activity was assessed as a function of [3H]thymidine incorporation in situ. All the chemical allergens tested provoked robust proliferative responses, with the stimulation indices recorded at both test concentrations reflecting only small changes in activity compared with previously recorded data. Exposure to vehicle (4:1 acetone:olive oil, AOO) alone resulted in detectable, although variable, expression of both IFN-gamma and IL-12. Treatment with chemical allergen in each case caused a marked increase in IFN-gamma secretion, with particularly vigorous production of cytokine being stimulated following exposure to oxazolone or hexyl cinnamic aldehyde. In contrast, application of chemical allergens was not generally associated with elevated IL-12 p40 secretion. Exposure of mice to PABA did not result in increased IFN-gamma or IL-12 production compared with vehicle-treated controls. In general, however, cytokine secretion did not correlate closely with the induction of LNC proliferation. These data indicate that expression by allergen-activated LNC of IFN-gamma or IL-12 does not provide a reliable or sufficiently sensitive endpoint for the LLNA compared with [3H]thymidine incorporation in situ.

Allergens↗
PubMed1999

Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry.

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method for assessing the contact sensitization potential of chemicals. Based on events that occur during the induction phase of a contact sensitization response, the LLNA measures the in vivo proliferation of cells in the draining lymph nodes (DLNs) of mice following topical exposure to chemicals. In terms of predictive identification of important skin sensitizers, the LLNA has been shown to be at least as sensitive as, and much more reliable than, current guinea pig tests. However, proliferation has also been observed following treatment with some irritants. In an attempt to distinguish allergic from irritant-induced proliferation, flow cytometric techniques have been used to examine the phenotype of lymphocyte subsets in the DLNs as well as markers of T-lymphocyte activation and memory. Mice were treated on the ears for 3 consecutive days with allergens or irritants. The DLNs were harvested 72 h after the final treatment. Single-cell suspensions were prepared, counted, and stained for analysis of the percentages of T cells and B cells and T-cell expression of two adhesion molecules that have been associated with differentiating naïve and activated/memory T cells, CD62L (L-selectin) and CD44 (H-cam). Increases in lymph node cellularity were observed in both allergen- and irritant-treated mice relative to naïve and vehicle-treated animals. Mice treated with allergens showed a preferential increase in the percentage of B220(+) B cells compared with irritant-treated mice. Treatment with allergens, but not irritants, resulted in a selective increase in the percentages of CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells expressing the T-cell activation/memory phenotype CD62L(lo)CD44(hi). Taken together, flow cytometric analysis of cell phenotype and expression of T-cell activation/memory markers may provide important information for differentiating allergen- and irritant-induced proliferative responses in the DLNs of chemically treated mice.

Allergens↗
PubMed1999

Threshold for classification as a skin sensitizer in the local lymph node assay: a statistical evaluation.

For more than 15 years, the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) has undergone development, evaluation and validation as an alternative approach to the predictive identification of skin sensitizing chemicals. The criteria by which sensitizing chemicals are distinguished from those without significant skin sensitising hazard were developed empirically and were based on experience rather than a mathematical formula or statistical method. The current practice is to classify, as skin sensitizers, those chemicals which at one or more test concentrations stimulate a threefold or greater increase in the proliferative activity in draining lymph node cells. Despite the apparent confirmation of the utility of this approach from the extensive data available, there has not previously been any attempt to substantiate the accuracy of this criterion. In this present investigations, data from 134 chemicals tested in the LLNA and in the guinea pig and/or for which there exists clear evidence relating to human skin sensitization potential, have been subjected to a rigorous statistical evaluation using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Whether the analysis is based on a comparison with guinea pig or human data, the results indicate that the empirically derived threefold threshold is an acceptable practical value for hazard identification.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗
PubMed2004

Reproducible prediction of contact allergenic potency using the local lymph node assay.

A considerable body of data has been accumulated which demonstrates that the local lymph node assay (LLNA) can provide a valuable estimation of the contact allergenic potency of a substance. This estimate is obtained via interpolation of the LLNA dose-response curve and is expressed as the concentration of the chemical required to evince a 3-fold stimulation of proliferation in lymph nodes draining the site of application compared to the vehicle-treated controls (EC3). It has also been shown that the EC3 estimates are reproducible and are stable over time. In the present work, we have extended this information by a demonstration of the inherent biological variability surrounding EC3 estimation, using data derived (from a single laboratory) from the testing of isoeugenol as a positive control. Isoeugenol gave EC3 values ranging from 0.5 to 2.6% (n = 29), with a mean and standard deviation of 1.2 +/- 0.6%. Given that EC3 values for a variety of contact allergens range over several orders of magnitude, these results further endorse the utility of EC3 values as a reliable indicator of human contact allergenic potency.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2006

The local lymph node assay in practice: a current regulatory perspective.

Following the formal acceptance of the local lymph node assay (LLNA) as an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) guideline in April 2002, the UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) informed notifiers that this was now the method of choice for the assessment of skin sensitization potential under the EU notification scheme for new industrial chemicals (NONS). This paper summarizes the experience of the HSE for the 2-year period immediately following the issuing of this statement, during which 48 LLNA study reports were assessed for notification purposes. The issues discussed here include adherence to the OECD guideline, interpretation of results, and classification outcomes. Generally, notifying laboratories followed the OECD guideline successfully, with regard to the sex/ strain/numbers of mice used, the precise process used for measurement of cell proliferation, and the use of recommended vehicles and positive controls. Initially, use of the individual animal approach (measuring the cell proliferation in each animal rather than for a pooled dose group) highlighted problems caused by technical inexperience, but these were overcome by practice. Toxicity or irritation were found to be minor factors in dose selection; more important was the choice of vehicle to correctly maximize the test substance concentration, while maintaining appropriate application properties. Contrary to concerns that the LLNA would prove to be less sensitive or more sensitive than the traditionally used Guinea Pig Maximization Test (GPMT), the proportion of new substances classified as skin sensitizers was within the range observed in previous years. Although the sample size is relatively small, the experience of the HSE indicates that the LLNA is satisfactory for routine regulatory use.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

The local lymph node assay and skin sensitization: a cut-down screen to reduce animal requirements?

The local lymph node assay (LLNA), an alternative approach to skin-sensitizing testing, has made a significant contribution to animal welfare by permitting a reduction and refinement of animal use. Although there is clearly an aspiration to eliminate the use of animals in such tests, it is appropriate also to consider other opportunities for refinement and reduction of animal use. We have therefore explored the use of a modified version of the LLNA for screening purposes when there is a need to evaluate the sensitizing activity of a large number of chemicals, as will be the case under the auspices of registration, evaluation and authorization of chemicals (REACH). Using an existing LLNA database of 211 chemicals, we have examined whether a cut-down assay comprising a single high-dose group and a concurrent vehicle control would provide a realistic approach for screening chemicals for sensitizing potential. The analyses reported here suggest this is the case. We speculate that the animal welfare benefits may be enhanced further by reducing the number of animals per experimental group. However, a detailed evaluation will be necessary to provide reassurance that a reduction in group size would provide adequate sensitivity across a range of skin sensitization potencies.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗
PubMed2003

Use of the local lymph node assay in the evaluation of the sensitizing potential of pharmaceutical process intermediates.

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) has recently been developed to determine the contact sensitization potential of chemicals. Since its original development, the LLNA results have been the subject of extensive comparisons with guinea pig and human data. The investigations described here were designed to explore the ability of the LLNA to identify accurately, pharmaceutical process intermediates (PIs) known to cause contact allergy in humans. To that end, 16 PIs previously tested in the guinea-pig maximization test (GPMT) were tested in the LLNA. Another PI known to be a contact sensitizer in humans was tested only in the LLNA. Cases of contact sensitization in humans were reported only for PIs that were extreme sensitizers in the GPMT and had low EC3 values (concentration of the test substance required to generate a threefold increase in lymph node cell proliferation) in the LLNA. These data provide additional evidence that the LLNA is able to discriminate skin sensitizers from chemicals that do not possess a significant skin sensitization potential and is thus a useful method for hazard identification. In addition, this method also offers important animal welfare benefits and may also be useful for risk assessment purposes.

Allergens↗
PubMed1989

The murine local lymph node assay for identification of contact allergens: a preliminary evaluation of in situ measurement of lymphocyte proliferation.

A murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergens has been developed. Contact sensitizing activity is measured as a function of lymphocyte proliferation in the draining lymph node following repeated application of the test agent to the dorsum of the ear. In original studies, lymphocyte proliferative activity was measured in vitro. In an attempt to remove the requirement for tissue culture, and thereby enhance the utility of the local lymph node assay as a predictive screening method, a new protocol has been evaluated in which proliferation in draining nodes is measured following i.v. injection of 3H-thymidine.

Allergens↗
PubMed1998

Estimation of relative skin sensitizing potency using the local lymph node assay: a comparison of formaldehyde with glutaraldehyde.

BACKGROUND: Chemicals vary considerably in their intrinsic ability to cause allergic contact dermatitis. Presently, there are no experimental methods available for the quantitative assessment of the relative sensitizing potency of chemical allergens. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the investigations described here was to evaluate the use of the local lymph node assay for determining the relative skin sensitizing potential of chemicals. This has been addressed by comparing the sensitizing potency of formaldehyde with glutaraldehyde. METHODS: Dose responses induced by formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde in the local lymph node assay, using either acetone or dimethylformamide (DMF) as the application vehicle, have been measured. Relative skin sensitizing potency was estimated as a function of the amount of chemical required to induce a threefold increase in lymph node cell proliferative activity, a mathematically derived EC3 value (estimated concentration required to induce a stimulation index of 3). RESULTS: In both vehicles, glutaraldehyde induced substantially more vigorous responses in the local lymph node assay (EC3 values of 0.006mol/L in acetone and 0.002mol/L in DMF) than did formaldehyde (EC3 values of 0.18mol/L in acetone and 0.11mol/L in DMF). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that glutaraldehyde has a considerably greater potential to induce skin sensitization than does formaldehyde; the data are consistent with what is known of the ability of these chemicals to cause allergic contact dermatitis in humans. Using formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde as examples, the results here illustrate the utility of EC3 values derived from local lymph node assay responses for the estimation of the relative potency of skin sensitizing chemicals.

Allergens↗