Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Lifting”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Laparoscopic-assisted colon surgery by abdominal wall lifting with newly developed lifting bars.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted colon surgery by lifting the abdominal wall with newly developed lifting bars. METHODS: We have made and used two kinds of lifting bars: type I and type T. Two I-type lifting bars are used in transverse colectomy and right hemicolectomy. One I-type lifting bar and one T-type bar are used in sigmoid colectomy and low anterior resection. After the intestine is dissected and the mesenterium is treated under laparoscopy, a small laparotomy wound about 4 to 6 cm long is made, and the intestine is pulled out of the body for extracorporeal anastomosis. RESULTS: The mean operating time was 153.8 +/- 51.9 min, and no particular complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Since postoperative pain is mild and postoperative recovery is rapid, this method is considered to be an effective surgical procedure.

Abdominal Muscles↗

Video-assisted endoscopic transtemporal multilayer upper midface lift (MUM-Lift).

Minimally invasive surgery has been used successfully recently to improve brow ptosis and forehead rhytids. Because the face tends to age more vertically, rather than obliquely, it makes sense to perform the correction in a more vertical direction. Therefore, the authors introduce a video-assisted endoscopic transtemporal approach to allow a multiplanar (subperiosteal, sub-SMAS, and subcutaneous) vertical upper midface elevation (MUM-Lift) avoiding extensive lateral temporal and preauricular incisions. Between 1996 and 2003, 53 patients (8 males, 45 females; age, 47 +/- 6 years) underwent MUM-Lift. This includes simultaneous forehead lift, blepharoplasties and video-assisted transtemporal sub-SMAS and subcutaneous upper midface tissue release, vertico-lateral repositioning, and fixation. Using the various planes of release in the midface produces less tension on each layer and provides a natural and improved facial rejuvenation of the forehead, as well as of the upper midface. The results confirmed that limited incision forehead-plasty techniques in combination with a transtemporal sub-SMAS and subcutaneous upper midface lift (MUM-Lift) reduces unnecessary vascular compromise on any particular layer and can be safely and predictably performed over the zygomatic muscle. This newly introduced procedure is an exciting feature that has evolved into a useful modality. It provides natural and improved facial rejuvenation.

Blepharoplasty↗

A 5-year study of the transmalar subperiosteal midface lift with minimal skin and superficial musculoaponeurotic system dissection: a durable, natural-appearing lift with less surgery and recovery time.

The transmalar subperiosteal midface lift is a simple, direct-approach procedure to be performed with a meloplasty. The entry into the midface is at the site of maximum suture tension, which allows for more elevation. The skin is elevated enough to expose the entry site, which is on the zygoma just cephalad to the origins of the zygomaticus muscles. Through a small hole at that site, a periosteal elevator is used for the midface dissection. This is a blind dissection, and the technique is described. The advantages of the technique are that there is (1) no lower-lid incision or risk of an ectropion, (2) a resultant tightening and elevation of the lower lid, (3) more elevation and durability because the zygomaticus muscle origins are elevated with the periosteum and are sutured to the very substantial deep temporal fascia, (4) a simple and fast procedure, and (5) no telltale sign of a face lift. Both the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) and the skin are substantially elevated with the transmalar subperiosteal midface lift to the extent that they should be only minimally dissected. In the author's opinion, the extended dissection of the skin and/or the SMAS does not increase the amount of tissue lift and probably reduces it in most cases, considering that the goal is a natural look and not one that appears pulled or stretched. The skin is elevated only for exposure, and the SMAS is elevated only enough to create a preauricular SMAS-platysma flap to tighten the neck. With two fewer layers of dissection, there is significantly less postoperative swelling and recovery time. The article presents the technique, the results on 272 patients over a period of 5 years, and a discussion. No patients described have had secondary procedures such as lasers, so the transmalar subperiosteal midface lift can be evaluated on its own merit.

Dissection↗

The muscular load on the lower back and shoulders due to lifting at different lifting heights and frequencies.

The aim of the study was to investigate the muscular load on the lower back and shoulders and the circulatory load on employees at a post center during repetitive lifting of mail transport boxes. A mock-up was designed in the laboratory, a total of nine combinations of lifting height and frequency were studied. Surface EMG was recorded bisymmetrically from m. erector spinae (L3-level) and m. trapezius. The circulatory load was evaluated by measuring the heart rate. The results show a trade off between the low back and shoulders. The maximum load on the low back occurred at the low lifting height (363 and 54.4 cm) whereas the maximum load on the shoulders occurred at the high lifting height (144.9 and 163.0 cm).

Adult↗

Correlation of lifting versus non-lifting and microscopic depth of invasion in early colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The non-lifting sign is considered a contraindication to endoscopic resection. Our objective was to investigate whether lifting or nonlifting of a lesion is determined by the volume of normal submucosal tissue. METHODS: We measured the thickness of the submucosa and examined the relation between submucosal invasion and lesion elevation induced by submucosal injection in 60 patients with colorectal cancer with evidence of submucosal invasion. Extent of tumor elevation was classified into two groups: A, lifting; B, non-lifting. Submucosal invasion was classified as sm1, sm2, or sm3. The distance between the carcinoma and the line of resection and that between the carcinoma and the muscularis propria were measured. RESULTS: Of 31 sm1 lesions, 29 (93.5%) were group A. All 6 sm3 lesions were group B. All lesions in group A had a value for the distance between carcinoma and muscularis propria of more than 1000 microm. Group B lesions with sm3 invasion had distances of only 105 to 750 microm. CONCLUSION: Lesions classified as sm3 do not elevate in response to submucosal injection, and lesions that become elevated on injection can be resected endoscopically because they are sm1 or sm2 and have a thickness of normal submucosa of more than 1000 microm.

Adenomatous Polyps↗

Laparoscopic surgery by abdominal wall lifting using original lifting bars.

Laparoscopic surgery by abdominal wall lifting may be less invasive than by pneumoperitoneum, because the influence of the pneumoperitoneum can be avoided. We have performed laparoscopic surgery without pneumoperitoneum by lifting the full layer of the abdominal wall using two unique kinds of lifting bars that we developed. We have used this method on a total of 154 patients and obtained favorable results. Laparotomy was performed in three of the 104 patients undergoing cholecystectomy. All of them had previously undergone gastrectomy, and laparotomy was performed because of severe intraperitoneal adhesions. There were no severe complications, but insufficient suturing was experienced in one patient who underwent resection of the large intestine. In this article we describe the procedures and results of the lifting method.

Abdominal Muscles↗

Effect of a stiff lifting belt on spine compression during lifting.

STUDY DESIGN: An in vivo study on weightlifters. OBJECTIVES: To determine if and how a stiff back belt affects spinal compression forces in weightlifting. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In weightlifting, a back belt has been reported to enhance intraabdominal pressure (IAP) and to reduce back muscle EMG and spinal compression forces. METHODS: Nine experienced weightlifters lifted barbells up to 75% body weight while inhaling and wearing a belt, inhaling and not wearing a belt, and exhaling and wearing a belt. IAP, trunk muscle EMG, ground reaction forces, and kinematics were measured. An EMG-assisted trunk model, including IAP effects, was used to calculate spinal compression and shear forces and to reveal the contribution of back muscles, abdominal muscles, and IAP to moment generation. RESULTS: The belt reduced compression forces by about 10%, but only when inhaling before lifting. The moment generated by IAP increased when wearing a belt and inhaling, but this moment was small and the increase was largely negated by the flexing moment generated by abdominal muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Wearing a tight and stiff back belt while inhaling before lifting reduces spine loading. This is caused by a moment generated by the belt rather than by the IAP.

Abdominal Muscles↗

Do forehead lifts lift or unfurl?

Forehead lifts are becoming increasingly more popular as an adjunct to facial rejuvenation. Considerable confusion exists as to how much the eyebrow should be elevated and how much scalp should be removed to achieve this goal. In an effort to evaluate this question, we have reviewed our recent forehead lift experience. These were done with forehead flap dissection down to glabella and supraorbital ridge, partial resection of corrugator supercilii, procerus, and frontalis muscles, and limited skin resection. We suggest that a natural-appearing, rejuvenating forehead lift should unfurl facial wrinkles without excessive eyebrow elevation. Technical maneuvers to obtain this goal are discussed.

Forehead↗

Buttocks lifting: how and when to use medial, lateral, lower, and upper lifting techniques.

New buttocks-lifting techniques are evolving rapidly, with some so recent that very few surgeons have performed them. However, a few new principles may be drawn from the various techniques in an attempt to produce better results and minimize scars. The indications for use of a medial, lateral, lower, or upper buttocks lift are presented in this article. There is no technique for all seasons and a surgeon who intends to perform a buttocks lift must evaluate the four techniques and the indications for each. An intramuscular implant helps to improve results even further and should be used when appropriate.

Buttocks↗

Minimal access cranial suspension lift: a modified S-lift.

There is a strong trend at hand toward less dramatic facial rejuvenation surgery. Most of the authors' patients want a cosmetic improvement but not at the cost of prolonged disfigurement or a high risk of complications. In 1999, a very simple but effective rhytidectomy technique, termed an S-lift, was described in the literature and was adopted by the authors. Its basic principle is the suspension of sagging facial features by a strong, permanent purse-string suture. The procedure is performed with the patient under local anesthesia. Significant modifications were applied to the incision, to the purse-string suture anchoring site, and to the direction and shape of the skin excision. The authors named the modified procedure the minimal access cranial suspension lift to specifically describe the concept of the technique. Through an inverted L-shaped preauricular incision with extension below the sideburn, a limited skin undermining is performed. Two strong, permanent purse-string sutures are woven into the superficial musculoaponeurotic system tissues in a vertical U and an oblique O shape, initiating from a strong anchorage in the deep temporal fascia at the level of the helical crus. Tying these sutures produces a very powerful vertical correction of descended facial features that acts mainly on the jowls and the upper neck. The procedure can be extended by continuing the dissection over the malar fat pad, placing a third vertical purse-string suture with strong action on the nasolabial groove, and vertically repositioning the midfacial volumes. During 20 months, pleasing results and a very low complication rate were obtained in 88 consecutive patients with a mean age of 551/2 years. In this article, the authors provide a detailed description of the anesthetic and surgical technique, a demonstration of the results in different patient age categories, and a discussion comparing the minimal access cranial suspension lift with other types of facial rejuvenation procedures.

Adult↗

Mesh lift: a new procedure for long-lasting results in brow lift surgery.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of recurrent eyebrow ptosis is the greatest challenge in brow lift surgery today. In this article, the author describes a new surgical procedure to provide long-lasting results in brow lift surgery. METHODS: Over 7 years, this new technique was used in 37 patients. Except for four, all patients were women aged 22 to 57 years. In this procedure, a polypropylene mesh strap is used as a suspender to maintain the elevated position of the eyebrow. The mesh suspender is placed in a subgaleal tunnel that is created between a limited temporal scalp incision and a classic upper blepharoplasty incision. The distal end of the mesh is sutured to the undersurface of the upper orbital part of the orbicularis oculi muscle, and the proximal end is fixed to the periosteum at the temporal region after a desired eyebrow position is obtained by traction of the mesh suspender superolaterally. RESULTS: The polypropylene mesh was tolerated well in all patients. No complication related to foreign body reaction was encountered. During 6 months to 4 years of follow-up, none of the patients experienced recurrent eyebrow ptosis. The long-term results revealed a long-lasting, almost permanent eyebrow elevation in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: This new technique seems to be useful in prevention of recurrent eyebrow ptosis following brow lift surgery. The author suggests that, after its integration with reoperative tissue, the mesh suspender becomes an artificial suspensory aponeurosis that provides stable fixation to maintain the elevated position of the eyebrow. This is considered to be the main reason for the excellent long-lasting results obtained in the current clinical study.

Adult↗

Optimising results from minimal access cranial suspension lifting (MACS-lift).

Between November 1999 and February 2005, 450 minimal access cranial suspension (MACS) lifts were performed. Starting with the idea of suspension for sagging soft tissues using permanent purse-string sutures, a new comprehensive approach to facial rejuvenation was developed in which the vertical vector appeared to be essential. The neck is corrected by extended submental liposuction and strong vertical traction on the lateral part of the platysma by means of a first vertical purse-string suture. The volume of the jowls and the cheeks is repositioned in a cranial direction with a second, slightly oblique purse-string suture. The descent of the midface is corrected by suspending the malar fat pad in a nearly vertical direction. In 23 cases (5.1%), the result in the neck was unsatisfactory, and additional work had to be done secondarily, or in later cases, primarily. The problem that appeared was unsatisfactory correction of platysmal bands (resolved with an additional anterior cervicoplasty) or vertical skin folds that appeared in the infralobular region (corrected with an additional posterior cervicoplasty). This article describes two ancillary procedures that, although not frequently necessary, can optimise the result of MACS lifting.

Adipose Tissue↗

[The contributions of Julien Bourguet (1876-1952) to frontocervicofacial lifting. Historical aspects of the first face lift].

The author devotes this article to the contributions of Julien Bourguet to the medical literature and mainly to facelift operations. In studying the bibliography of J. Bourguet, one is impressed by the variety of his interests in all problems of facial pathology: ENT, Ophthalmic Surgery, Maxillo-facial surgery, Neurosurgery, Plastic and Aesthetic surgery, as well as surgical disorders of the brain and mainly the hypophysis. The main goal of the article is the study of the contributions of Julien Bourguet to plastic esthetic surgery of the face and mainly to his original concepts and techniques in face lifting operations and blepharoplasties where he can be considered to be real pioneer and even the father of modern face lifting operations.

France↗

Short-scar face lift with extended SMAS platysma dissection and lifting and limited skin undermining.

In the past 8 years, short-scar cervicofacial rhytidectomy has been used with great success and a high level of patient satisfaction. The operation involves limited incisions in the sideburn and preauricular areas, extending just around the fold of the ear lobule. Extensive undermining of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS)/platysma is performed, and lifting of the face and neck is performed mainly at this level. Skin undermining is kept to a minimum, eliminating the need for extended incisions to reduce dog-ears. The preservation of fibrous bands between the skin and the SMAS/platysma unit is an important factor in making such an operation practical and is the reason why the skin incisions can be kept short. Dissection of large areas of skin and separation of the skin from the underlying SMAS necessitate larger incisions. The operation is safe, speedy, less traumatic, and well tolerated among patients at high risk, such as smokers. The risks of complications are also reduced with this operation.

Female↗

Medical devices; reports of corrections and removals; lift of stay of effective date--FDA. Final rule; lift of stay of effective date.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is lifting a stay of the effective date of certain provisions in a final rule on establishing procedures for submission of reports of corrections and removals of medical devices. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the collection of information requirements contained in the final rule.

Device Approval↗

The forehead lift: a useful adjunct to face lift and blepharoplasty.

The forehead lift, with interruption of the continuity of the frontalis muscle, has been an effective method in our hands for improving the appearance of the upper third of the face. It can be done independently, or combined with a facial rhytidectomy, a blepharoplasty, and/or other ancillary procedures. In some cases of apparent upper lid redundancy, it can eliminate the need for an upper lid blepharoplasty. The results are pleasing and seem to be lasting, while the complications have been few and mild. We describe the operation and discuss its indications, contraindications, advantages, and disadvantages.

Eyelids↗