Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “LexA Repressor Protein”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Read-through transcription from a derepressed Tn3 promoter affects ColE1 functions on a ColE1::Tn3 composite plasmid.

Mutations in the repressor encoded by the transposon Tn3 tnpR gene lead to increased levels of expression of two gene products: the mutant repressor (TnpR-) and the Tn3 encoded transposase, TnpA (Heffron et al. 1978; Chou et al. 1979a). Derivatives of the ColE1::Tn3 composite plasmid, RSF2124, with mutant Tn3 repressor exhibited the expected elevated levels of transposition. Unexpectedly, hosts containing these tnpR- derivatives produced enhanced levels of the ColE1 encoded toxin, colicin E1. The gene for colicin E1 maps far (0.23-0.98 MU) from the Tn3 insertion point (0.73 MU) (Fig. 1). The colicin E1 overproduction phenotype, designated Eop-, was complemented in trans by wild type repressor gene product (TnpR+) to the wild type phenotype, Eop+. Hosts with RSF2124 derivatives which expressed high levels of both mutant repressor and mutant transposase (TnpR-, TnpA-) were Eop-. Hosts containing plasmids deleted for both tnpA and tnpR promoters were Eop+, while hosts with plasmids carrying a lac promoter substitution for the tnpA promoter were Eop-. These data support the idea that a cis-acting effect of increased transcription from the tnpA promoter into adjacent ColE1 DNA was the cause of colicin overproduction. Increased transcription activated a putative colicin augmentation function (caf) whose presence was required for the Eop- phenotype. Deletion mapping established that one boundary of the caf locus lies within 52 bases of the junction of the left end of Tn3 and ColE1 DNA. ColE1 DNA in this area contains an open reading frame which could encode either a 74 or a 63 residue protein (B. Polisky, unpublished DNA sequence data). The presence of increased levels of an mRNA transcript from this region and/or the increased expression of protein(s) from this transcript could result in an Eop- phenotype. Expression of the Eop- phenotype requires the presence of the host recE gene. Evidence is presented which suggests that the recA repressor, lexA protein, controls expression of the recE gene product, ExoVIII.

Cloning, Molecular↗

Information content of binding sites on nucleotide sequences.

Repressors, polymerases, ribosomes and other macromolecules bind to specific nucleic acid sequences. They can find a binding site only if the sequence has a recognizable pattern. We define a measure of the information (R sequence) in the sequence patterns at binding sites. It allows one to investigate how information is distributed across the sites and to compare one site to another. One can also calculate the amount of information (R frequency) that would be required to locate the sites, given that they occur with some frequency in the genome. Several Escherichia coli binding sites were analyzed using these two independent empirical measurements. The two amounts of information are similar for most of the sites we analyzed. In contrast, bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase binding sites contain about twice as much information as is necessary for recognition by the T7 polymerase, suggesting that a second protein may bind at T7 promoters. The extra information can be accounted for by a strong symmetry element found at the T7 promoters. This element may be an operator. If this model is correct, these promoters and operators do not share much information. The comparisons between R sequence and R frequency suggest that the information at binding sites is just sufficient for the sites to be distinguished from the rest of the genome.

Bacterial Proteins↗

A comparative three-dimensional model of the carboxy-terminal domain of the lambda repressor and its use to build intact repressor tetramer models bound to adjacent operator sites.

A model for residues 93-236 of the lambda repressor (1gfx) was predicted, based on the UmuD(') crystal structure, as part of four intact repressor molecules bound to two adjacent operator sites. The structure of region 136-230 in 1gfx was found to be nearly identical to the independently determined crystal structure of the 132-236 fragment, 1f39, released later by the PDB. Later, two more tetrameric models of the lambda repressor tetramer bound to two adjacent operator sites were constructed by us; in one of these, 1j5g, the N-domain and C-domain coordinates and hence monomer-monomer and dimer-dimer interactions are almost the same as in 1gfx, but the structure of the linker region is partly based on the linker region of the LexA dimer in 1jhe; in the other, 1lwq, the crystalline tetramer for region 140-236 has been coopted from the crystal structure deposited in 1kca, the operator DNA and N-domain coordinates of which are same as those in 1gfx and 1j5g, but the linker region is partly based on the LexA dimer structures 1jhe and 1jhh. Monomer-monomer interactions at the same operator site are stabilized by exposed hydrophobic side chains in beta-strands while cooperative interactions are mostly confined to beta(6) and some adjacent residues in both 1gfx and 1j5g. Mutational data, existence of a twofold axis relating two C-domains within a dimer, and minimization of DNA distortion between adjacent operator sites allow us to roughly position the C-domain with respect to the N-domain for both 1gfx and 1j5g. The study correlates these models with functional, biochemical, biophysical, and immunological data on the repressor in the literature. The oligomerization mode observed in the crystal structure of 132-236 may not exist in the intact repressor bound to the operator since it is shown to contradict several published biochemical data on the intact repressor.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

A two-hybrid dual bait system to discriminate specificity of protein interactions.

Biological regulatory systems require the specific organization of proteins into multicomponent complexes. Two hybrid systems have been used to identify novel components of signaling networks based on interactions with defined partner proteins. An important issue in the use of two-hybrid systems has been the degree to which interacting proteins distinguish their biological partner from evolutionarily conserved related proteins and the degree to which observed interactions are specific. We adapted the basic two-hybrid strategy to create a novel dual bait system designed to allow single-step screening of libraries for proteins that interact with protein 1 of interest, fused to DNA binding domain A (LexA), but do not interact with protein 2, fused to DNA binding domain B (lambda cI). Using the selective interactions of Ras and Krev-1(Rap1A) with Raf, RalGDS, and Krit1 as a model, we systematically compared LexA- and cI-fused baits and reporters. The LexA and cI baitr reporter systems are well matched for level of bait expression and sensitivity range for interaction detection and allow effective isolation of specifically interacting protein pairs against a nonspecific background. These reagents should prove useful to refine the selectivity of library screens, to reduce the isolation of false positives in such screens, and to perform directed analyses of sequence elements governing the interaction of a single protein with multiple partners.

Bacterial Proteins↗

A LexA mutant repressor with a relaxed inter-domain linker.

The LexA protein is part of a large family of prokaryotic transcriptional repressors that contain an amino-terminal DNA binding domain and a carboxy-terminal dimerization domain. These domains are separated by a linker or hinge region, which is generally considered to be rather flexible and unconstrained. So far, no structure of any of the full-length repressors is available. Here we show that a mutant LexA repressor harboring several point mutations in the hinge region gets sensitive to trypsin and Glu-C cleavage over a segment of at least 20 amino acids, whereas the LexA wild-type hinge region is resistant to these proteases. These data are not compatible with the hypothesis of an fully flexible and/or unstructured inter-domain linker and suggest that the LexA hinge region is, in fact, constrained by contacts with the carboxy-terminal domain and/or a fairly stable local structure of the linker region.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Connection between gene dosage and protein stability revealed by a high-yield production of recombinant proteins in an E. coli LexA1(Ind-) background.

Bacterial production of a plasmid-encoded bacteriophage P22 tailspike protein shows different yield and impact on cell viability in RecA+ LexA+, RecA- LexA+ and RecA+ LexA1(Ind-) backgrounds. In a LexA1(Ind-) context, we have observed lesser toxicity and higher productivity than in the wild-type strain, in which the bacterial growth was inhibited after induction of recombinant gene expression. Also, a negative effect of the incubation temperature on the growth of producing cells was also detected. By exploring the molecular basis of these inhibitory events, we found a connection between the dosage of the recombinant gene and the proteolytic stability of the encoded protein. Under both genetic and environmental conditions favoring higher plasmid copy number and consequently increasing the synthesis rate of the recombinant protein, enhanced protein degradation was observed in parallel with an important growth inhibition. Altogether, the obtained data suggest the existence of a critical concentration of recombinant protein over which cell proteolysis is stimulated at rates not compatible with optimal physiological conditions for bacterial growth.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Regulation and SOS induction of division inhibition in Escherichia coli K12.

When Escherichia coli is subjected to treatments that damage DNA or perturb DNA replication considerable cell filamentation occurs. It has been postulated that this phenomenon is associated with the presence of a division inhibitor induced coordinately with the SOS functions. The role of this induction would be to delay septation during DNA repair to prevent the formation of DNAless cells. In this communication, we present evidence for such a division inhibitor based on the properties of a division mutant which is hyperactive in the septation delay. Cells of this mutant filament extensively after a nutritional shift-up, have drastically reduced colony-forming abilities on a rich medium but not on a minimal medium following treatment with ultraviolet radiation and, are deficient in the lysogenization of phage lambda; phenotypes which are characteristic of but expressed to a much lower extent in another type of division mutant called Ion. Cells harboring the division mutation plus either one of the lexA mutant alleles, spr-51 or tsl-1, are filamentous suggesting that they are permanently derepressed for division inhibition. These results are in agreement with models that assign the regulation of cell division to a division inhibitor which is regulated by the lexA repressor protein.

Bacteriophage lambda↗

Viability of Escherichia coli K-12 DNA adenine methylase (dam) mutants requires increased expression of specific genes in the SOS regulon.

We have examined the level of expression of the SOS regulon in cells lacking DNA adenine methylase activity (dam-). Mud (Ap, lac) fusions to several SOS operons (recA, lexA, uvrA, uvrB, uvrD, sulA, dinD and dinF) were found to express higher levels of beta-galactosidase in dam- strains than in isogenic dam+ strains. The attempted construction of dam- strains that were also mutant in one of several SOS genes indicated that the viability of methylase-deficient strains correlates with the inactivation of the SOS repressor (LexA protein). Consistent with this, the wild-type functions of two LexA-repressed genes (recA and ruv) appear to be required for dam- strain viability.

DNA Repair↗

Expression of lexA targeted ribozyme in Escherichia coli BL-21 (DE3) cells.

Coding sequences for a hammerhead ribozyme designed to cleave lexA mRNA in a targeted manner was cloned under phage T7 promoter and expressed in E. coli strain BL-21 (DE3) expressing T7 RNA polymerase under the control of IPTG-inducible lac UV-5 promoter. Ribozyme expression in vivo was demonstrated by RNase protection assay. Also, total RNA extracted from these transformed cells following induction by IPTG, displays site-specific cleavage of labeled lexA RNA in an in vitro reaction. The result demonstrates the active ribozyme in extracts of cell transformed with a recombinant cassette and goes beyond the earlier demonstration of the stability of in vitro synthesized ribozyme in cell extracts. The observed rise in lexA mRNA rules out any role for protease activity or resulting fragments of lexA protein in de-repression of RNA.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Self-cleaving proteases.

Research on the activity of self-cleaving proteases in bacterial, mammalian and virus-infected cells is reviewed, with an emphasis on the diversity of regulatory systems controlled by protein processing. Each of these three groups will be considered in turn by focusing on the following systems: the Rec A-dependent intramolecular cleavage of the Escherichia coli SOS response protein, LexA; the intramolecular activation of the mammalian aspartic acid protease, pepsinogen; and the autocatalytic cleavage of polyproteins synthesized by picornaviruses.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Transactivation potential of the C-terminus of human Nm23-H1.

The transactivation potential of Nm23-H1, a homolog of c-myc transcription factor Nm23-H2/PuF was assessed in yeast as a fusion protein with the DNA binding domains (DBDs) of GAL4 and LexA. The C-terminal half of Nm23-H1 exhibited strong transactivation of the reporter genes, LacZ and Leu2 carrying GAL4 and LexA upstream activating sequences (UASs), whereas the full-length Nm23-H1 and its N-terminal did not. Similar results were also obtained with Nm23-H2/PuF transactivating the reporter genes only by the C-terminus fused to GAL4 and LexA DBDs. Hence, our results suggested a possible regulatory role of the N-termini of Nm23 isotypes upon transactivation.

Bacterial Proteins↗

The nuclear protein p34SEI-1 regulates the kinase activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 in a concentration-dependent manner.

Previous studies have shown that p34(SEI-1), also known as TRIP-Br1, is involved in cell cycle regulations by interacting with a number of important proteins including CDK4. However, the detailed mechanism and structural basis of the interaction remains to be determined. We report the use of in vitro studies to address these problems. First, it was shown that p34(SEI-1) binds to CDK4 directly, and the binding does not compete directly with p16. In the presence of p16, a quaternary complex is formed between p34(SEI-1), CDK4, cyclin D2, and p16. Second, it was found that p34(SEI-1) activates the kinase activity of CDK4 at lower concentrations (reaching the maximum at 500 nM) but inhibits the same activity at higher concentrations, implying that p34(SEI-1)-mediated CDK4 activation is dose-dependent. Again, the effects of p34(SEI-1) and p16 are independent of each other. Third, it was shown that p34(SEI-1) possesses a LexA-mediated transactivation activity. Finally, a set of truncation mutants were used to dissect the structural elements responsible for the different functions of p34(SEI-1). The results indicate that the fragment 30-160 can bind, activate, and inhibit CDK4; the fragment 30-132 can bind and activate but does not inhibit CDK4, while the fragment 30-88 cannot bind, activate, or inhibit but retains the LexA-mediated transactivation activity.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

Identification of the operator of the lux regulon from the Vibrio fischeri strain ATCC7744.

Escherichia coli that carry a recombinant plasmid bearing the Vibrio fischeri lux regulon express luminescence that mimics the luminescence of V. fischeri. The lux regulon consists of two divergently transcribed operons, the rightward operon (luxICDABE genes) and the leftward operon (luxR gene). The luxR and luxI genes and the control region separating the two operons supply the primary regulatory control over the lux regulon; the regulatory mechanisms result in a dramatic increase in the rate of luciferase synthesis after induction, apparently due to a unique autoregulatory positive feedback mechanism, and in an enormous difference (greater than 10(4] in levels of luminescence in cells before and after induction. The generally accepted model of primary regulation of bioluminescence in V. fischeri involves the interaction of the product of the luxR gene and N-(3-oxohexanoyl)homoserine lactone, the autoinducer produced by the enzyme encoded by luxI, the first gene of the rightward operon, with an operator sequence within the control region to stimulate transcription of the rightward operon in a positive feedback loop. We have used deletion mapping of a transcription reporter vector to determine the approximate location of the operator. By site-directed mutagenesis of the presumed operator, we have demonstrated that the 20-base-pair inverted repeat ACCTGTAGGA/TCGTA CAGGT (where the vertical line is the center of symmetry), which bears striking similarity to the recognition sequence for the pleiotropic repressor protein LexA, is the operator of the lux regulon. We also found that deletion of sequences upstream of the palindrome leads to increased transcription from the rightward promoter (PR), indicative of a cis-acting element that represses transcription in the absence of the LuxR-autoinducer complex. Modifications of the palindrome that eliminate stimulation by LuxR-autoinducer of transcription from PR have no effect on repression by the cis-acting mechanism(s), suggesting that the palindrome is not necessary for repression of the rightward operon. Thus, it appears that the large increase in transcription upon induction of the lux regulon is the result of at least two independent mechanisms, one positive and the other negative.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Phenotypes of lexA mutations in Salmonella enterica: evidence for a lethal lexA null phenotype due to the Fels-2 prophage.

The LexA protein of Escherichia coli represses the damage-inducible SOS regulon, which includes genes for repair of DNA. Surprisingly, lexA null mutations in Salmonella enterica are lethal even with a sulA mutation, which corrects lexA lethality in E. coli. Nine suppressors of lethality isolated in a sulA mutant of S. enterica had lost the Fels-2 prophage, and seven of these (which grew better) had also lost the Gifsy-1 and Gifsy-2 prophages. All three phage genomes included a homologue of the tum gene of coliphage 186, which encodes a LexA-repressed cI antirepressor. The tum homologue of Fels-2 was responsible for lexA lethality and had a LexA-repressed promoter. This basis of lexA lethality was unexpected because the four prophages of S. enterica LT2 are not strongly UV inducible and do not sensitize strains to UV killing. In S. enterica, lexA(Ind(-)) mutants have the same phenotypes as their E. coli counterparts. Although lexA null mutants express their error-prone DinB polymerase constitutively, they are not mutators in either S. enterica or E. coli.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Tethered Sir3p nucleates silencing at telomeres and internal loci in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Rap1p binds to sites embedded within the Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomeric TG1-3 tract. Previous studies have led to the hypothesis that Rap1p may recruit Sir3p and Sir3p-associating factors to the telomere. To test this, we tethered Sir3p adjacent to the telomere via LexA binding sites in the rap1-17 mutant that truncates the Rap1p C-terminal 165 amino acids thought to contain sites for Sir3p association. Tethering of LexA-Sir3p adjacent to the telomere is sufficient to restore telomeric silencing, indicating that Sir3p can nucleate silencing at the telomere. Tethering of LexA-Sir3p or the LexA-Sir3p(N2O5) gain-of-function protein to a telomeric LexA site hyperrepresses an adjacent ADE2 gene in wild-type cells. Hence, Sir3p recruitment to the telomere is limiting in telomeric silencing. In addition, LexA-Sir3p(N2O5) hyperrepresses telomeric silencing when tethered to a subtelomeric site 3.6 kb from the telomeric tract. This hyperrepression is dependent on the C terminus of Rap1p, suggesting that subtelomeric LexA-Sir3p(N205) can interact with Rap1p-associated factors at the telomere. We also demonstrate that LexA-Sir3p or LexA-Sir3p(N205) tethered in cis with a short tract of telomeric TG1-3 sequences is sufficient to confer silencing at an internal chromosomal position. Internal silencing is enhanced in rap1-17 strains. We propose that sequestration of silencing factors at the telomere limits the efficiency of internal silencing.

Bacterial Proteins↗

What is the structure of the RecA-DNA filament?

The bacterial RecA protein has been a model system for understanding how a protein can catalyze homologous genetic recombination. RecA-like proteins have now been characterized from many organisms, from bacteriophage to humans. Some of the RecA-like proteins, including human RAD51, appear to function as helical filaments formed on DNA. However, we currently have high resolution structures of inactive forms of the protein, and low resolution structures of the active complexes formed by RecA-like proteins on DNA in the presence of ATP or ATP analogs. Within a crystal of the E. coli RecA protein, a helical polymer exists, and it has been widely assumed that this polymer is quite similar to the active helical filament formed on DNA. Recent developments have suggested that this may not be the case.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Deletions within a hinge region of a specific DNA-binding protein.

Many proteins are organized as a set of compact functional domains connected by flexible, exposed segments of the polypeptide chain. To study one of these connector regions, we isolated a series of functional in-frame deletions in the central portion of a specific DNA-binding protein, the LexA repressor of Escherichia coli. These mutant proteins fell into two main classes: those with small deletions of two to eight amino acids functioned as repressor about as well as did wild type, while those with large deletions of 17-22 amino acids functioned well only at considerably higher concentrations. The mutant proteins were resistant to the specific cleavage reaction that triggers the SOS response. These data suggest that the conformation of the hinge region in LexA protein is important for cleavage. By contrast, the hinge plays a topological role in repressor function, connecting the two functional halves of the protein; in the SOS response, this function of the hinge is inactivated by cleavage, leading to inactivation of the repressor.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

In vitro study of the interaction of the LexA repressor and the UvrC protein with a uvrC regulatory region.

The in vitro interaction of the LexA repressor with a regulatory region of the uvrC gene has been studied by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Although the uvrC promoter region shows some homology with the canonic LexA binding site, no specific binding of the repressor to this DNA sequence could be observed, but only a cooperative nonspecific binding. By the same technique we show that the UvrC protein does not bind specifically to this regulatory DNA sequence either, although the protein is able to bind nonspecifically and cooperatively to the double-stranded DNA fragment.

Bacterial Proteins↗