Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Levonorgestrel”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Bioavailability of the Yuzpe and levonorgestrel regimens of emergency contraception: vaginal vs. oral administration.

Separate crossover studies compared the bioavailability of oral vs. vaginal routes of administration for the Yuzpe (n=5) and levonorgestrel regimens (n=4) of emergency contraception. Twice the standard dose of the Yuzpe regimen (200 microg of ethinyl estradiol, 1000 microg of levonorgestrel) or the levonorgestrel regimen (1500 microg of levonorgestrel) was self-administered vaginally. One week later, each subject received orally the standard dose of the assigned medication. Serial blood samples were collected over 24 h and assayed for levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol (for the Yuzpe regimen only). Paired t tests were used to compare oral vs. vaginal administration for maximum concentration (Cmax), time to maximum concentration (Tmax) and area under the curve over 24 h (AUC0-24). Relative bioavailability (vaginal/oral) was derived from AUC0-24. Vaginal administration of double the standard dose of the Yuzpe regimen resulted in a lower Cmax (vaginal=5.4 vs. oral=14.6 ng/mL, p=.038) and a later Tmax (5.9 vs. 2.0 h, p=.066) for levonorgestrel, compared to oral administration. Corresponding ethinyl estradiol concentrations were higher (786 vs. 391 pg/mL, p=.039) and peaked later (4.0 vs. 1.9 hr, p=.154) with vaginal administration. Relative bioavailabilities for levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol were 58% and 175%, respectively. Similarly, vaginal administration of the levonorgestrel regimen resulted in a lower Cmax (vaginal=5.4 vs. oral=15.2 ng/mL, p=.006) and a later Tmax (7.4 vs. 1.3 h, p=.037) for levonorgestel, compared to oral administration. The relative bioavailability was 62%. Our preliminary data suggest that vaginal administration of these emergency contraception regimens appears to require at least three times the standard oral dose to achieve equivalent systemic levonorgestrel concentrations.

Administration, Intravaginal↗

Risk of nonfatal venous thromboembolism with oral contraceptives containing norgestimate or desogestrel compared with oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel.

CONTEXT: Previous studies have reported that users of the "third-generation" oral contraceptives (OCs) containing the progestins gestodene and desogestrel have about twice the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to users of older OCs containing levonorgestrel. Estimates of the risk for VTE among users of norgestimate-containing OCs compared to other OCs, however, are lacking. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to obtain quantitative information on the risk of nonfatal VTE in women using OCs containing either norgestimate or desogestrel in comparison with women taking OCs containing levonorgestrel. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Based on information from PharMetrics, a United States-based company that collects and records information on claims paid by managed care plans, we used a nested case-control study design to estimate relative risks of nonfatal VTE among 15- to 39-year-old current users of OCs containing norgestimate with 35 microg of ethinyl estradiol (EE), desogestrel with 30 microg of EE or levonorgestrel with 30 microg of EE, both monophasic and triphasic preparations, during the period January 2000 to March 2005. Cases were women with a well-documented VTE of uncertain origin that was diagnosed in current users of a study drug. Up to four controls were closely matched to each case by age and calendar time, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using conditional logistic regression comparing the risk of VTE among users of the three contraceptives. We also estimated and compared the incidence rates for all three OCs. RESULTS: Based on 281 newly diagnosed idiopathic cases of VTE and 1055 controls, we found that the adjusted ORs for nonfatal VTE comparing norgestimate- or desogestrel-containing OC users to users of levonorgestrel-containing OCs were 1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.8-1.6] and 1.7 (95% CI, 1.1-2.4), respectively. The incidence rates of VTE were 30.6 (95% CI, 25.5-36.5), 53.5 (95% CI, 42.9-66.0) and 27.1 (95% CI, 21.1-34.3) per 100,000 woman-years for users of norgestimate-, desogestrel- and levonorgestrel-containing OCs, respectively. The incidence rate ratios for norgestimate-containing OCs compared to levonorgestrel-containing OCs and desogestrel-containing OCs compared to levonorgestrel-containing OCs were 1.1 (95% CI, 0.8-1.5) and 2.0 (95% CI, 1.4-2.7), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of nonfatal VTE among users of desogestrel-containing OCs is significantly elevated compared to that of levonorgestrel-containing OCs. The risk of VTE in users of norgestimate-containing OCs was closely similar to that of users of levonorgestrel-containing OCs.

Adolescent↗

Assessment of the oestrogenic activity of the contraceptive progestin levonorgestrel and its non-phenolic metabolites.

Levonorgestrel (13beta-ethyl-17alpha-ethynyl-17beta-hydroxy-4-gonen-3-one), a potent contraceptive progestin stimulates growth and proliferation of cultured breast cancer cells through a receptor-mediated mechanism, even though levonorgestrel does not bind to the oestrogen receptor (ER). To assess whether the oestrogen-like effects induced by this synthetic progestin are exerted via its metabolic conversion products, we studied the binding affinity of three A-ring levonorgestrel derivatives to the ER and their capability to transactivate an oestrogen-dependent yeast system co-transfected with the human ER gene and oestrogen responsive elements fused to a beta-galactosidase reporter vector. The results demonstrated that the 3beta,5alpha reduced levonorgestrel derivative and to a lesser extent its 3alpha isomer interact with the oestrogen receptor, with a significantly lower relative binding affinity (2.4% and 0.4%, respectively) than that of oestradiol (100%), while levonorgestrel does not. Both levonorgestrel metabolites were able to activate, in a dose-dependent manner, the beta-galactosidase reporter gene in the yeast expression system, an effect that was precluded by a steroidal antioestrogen. The oestrogenic potency of levonorgestrel metabolites was significantly lower (750-fold) than that of oestradiol. Furthermore, high doses of 3beta,5alpha levonorgestrel (2.5 mg/day/6 days) induced an increase of oestrogen-dependent progestin receptor in the anterior pituitary of castrated rats. The overall data offer a plausible explanation for the weak oestrogenic effects induced by high, non-pharmacological doses of levonorgestrel.

Animals↗

Sustained intrauterine release of levonorgestrel over five years.

Two models of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices were studied. Model A was designed to deliver 20 micrograms/day, and model B was designed to deliver 30 micrograms/day. Plasma concentrations of levonorgestrel were determined in blood samples taken from women who used the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices (IUDs) and who participated in a clinical trial for more than 5 years. During clinical studies IUDs have been removed for various reasons between 8 and 40 months after insertion. The rate of release of levonorgestrel from the IUDs was calculated by determining the remaining amount of levonorgestrel. Plasma concentrations of levonorgestrel ranged between a mean +/- standard deviation (SD) concentration of 166 +/- 75 pg/ml and 131 +/- 32 pg/ml for the first 18 months of use and between 101 +/- 37 pg/ml and 74 +/- 15 pg/ml at 24 and 60 months after insertion of the IUD. The plasma concentrations from 24 months through 60 months were significantly lower than concentrations measured during initial months of IUD use, but not between the two devices. There was a strong correlation between the time of use and the amount of levonorgestrel lost from the IUDs. The calculated mean daily release of levonorgestrel was 17.6 micrograms for model A and 22.2 micrograms for model B. This gives a calculated lifetime of more than 6 years for a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Intrauterine 10 microg and 20 microg levonorgestrel systems in postmenopausal women receiving oral oestrogen replacement therapy: clinical, endometrial and metabolic response.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical and endometrial efficacy and lipid response of two different doses of intrauterine levonorgestrel were assessed in comparison with sequential oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in postmenopausal women receiving continuous oral E2-valerate. DESIGN: One-year prospective multicentre randomised control trial. SETTING: Four outpatient clinics in Oulu, Helsinki and Jyväskylä, Finland. POPULATION: A total of 163 healthy volunteer postmenopausal women with climacteric complaints or already using hormone replacement therapy (HRT). INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomly allocated to receive a new intrauterine system releasing 10 microg of levonorgestrel daily or an established intrauterine system (Mirena) releasing 20 microg of levonorgestrel daily or sequential oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (5mg/day, 14/30 days). All three regimens were combined with an oral daily dose of 2mg of E2-valerate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bleeding patterns were assessed by diaries kept by the subjects. Endometrial effects were evaluated by histologic biopsies taken at the baseline and after six and 12 months of therapy. Serum concentrations of total, HDL and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and lipoprotein(a) were determined at the baseline and after six and 12 months of therapy. RESULTS: Insertion of the smaller 10 microg levonorgestrel system was easy in 70% and difficult in 4% and that of Mirena was easy in 46% and difficult in 21% of the subjects. After six months of therapy, 43 (95.6%) of the 47 subjects receiving 10 microg levonorgestrel and 54 (98.2%) of the 55 subjects receiving 20 microg levonorgestrel had no bleeding, while the sequential medroxyprogesterone acetate regimen produced typical cyclic withdrawal bleedings. Endometrial hyperplasia was not observed in any of the treatment groups during the 12-month study. After 12 months of therapy, strong endometrial suppression was found in 46/47 and 55/55 of the subjects receiving 10 microg and 20 microg of levonorgestrel, respectively, while the endometrium was proliferative in 18/47 of the subjects in the medroxyprogesterone acetate group. Serum total cholesterol decreased in all treatment groups. HDL cholesterol increased in women receiving medroxyprogesterone acetate or the smaller intrauterine dose of levonorgestrel. CONCLUSIONS: Both intrauterine doses of levonorgestrel provided good endometrial protection in postmenopausal women on oestrogen replacement therapy. The advantage of the 10 microg system with a smaller size is the easier insertion of the system and a minimal attenuation of the favourable effects of oral oestrogen on the serum lipid profile.

Administration, Intravaginal↗

Risks and benefits, advantages and disadvantages of levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants.

Levonorgestrel-releasing implants are long acting contraceptives, approved for 5 years of continuous use. Two marketed systems, the six capsule Norplant use of tradenames is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement. and the two rod Jadelle, have essentially equal rates of drug release, pregnancy and adverse events over 5 years of use. Randomised clinical trials and controlled cohort observations indicate that for the first 3 years, when pregnancy rates are at or almost zero, no other contraceptive system is more effective, although etonogestrel implants provide equal effectiveness. Annual pregnancy rates rise in the fifth year of continuous use but remain below 1 per 100 women. Annual pregnancy rates of Norplant users remain below 1 per 100 throughout 7 years of continuous use. Levonorgestrel implants provide low progestogen doses; 40-50 microg/day at 1 year of use, decreasing to 25-30 microg/day in the fifth year. Serum levels of levonorgestrel at 5 years are 60-65% of those levels measured at 1 month of use. Adverse effects with levonorgestrel implants are similar to those observed with progestogen only and combined oral contraceptives. Risks of ectopic pregnancy, other pregnancy complications and pelvic inflammatory disease are reduced in comparison with those of women using copper or non-medicated intrauterine devices. Risks of developing gallbladder disease and hypertension or borderline hypertension, although small, are about 1.5 and 1.8 times greater, respectively, in women using levonorgestrel implants than in women not using hormonal contraception. Other serious diseases have not been found to occur significantly more frequently in levonorgestrel implant users than in women not using hormonal contraception. The great majority of levonorgestrel implant users experience menstrual problems, but serious bleeding problems are not more frequent than in controls. Other health problems reported more frequently by levonogestrel implant users than by women not using hormonal contraception in a study of 16000 women included skin conditions, headache, upper limb neuropathies, dizziness, nervousness, malaise, minor visual disturbances, respiratory conditions, arthropathies, weight change, anxiety and non-clinical depression. Clinical depression is not more frequent in women using implants compared with those not using hormonal contraception (i.e. using intrauterine devices, sterilisation). Removal problems occur less frequently with Jadelle than with Norplant. The mean removal time for Jadelle is half that of Norplant. Levonorgestrel implants in nationally representative scientific samples, in randomised trials, and in controlled cohort studies have continuation rates as high as or higher than any other reversible contraceptive over a duration of 5 years. This would imply that the satisfaction women derive from the contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel implants greatly outweighs the dissatisfaction that may accompany menstrual disturbances and other adverse effects associated with implants.

Contraceptive Agents, Female↗

Effects of tamoxifen and levonorgestrel treatment on carbon tetrachloride induced alterations in rats.

Oestrogens cause progression in liver lesion, and thus ovariectomy improves hepatic injury both functionally and histologically. In the present study the efficacy of the antioestrogen tamoxifen (CAS 10540-29-1) was examined in chronical carbon tetrachloride damage. The results were compared with the effect of the progestogen levonorgestrel. Male Wistar rats were treated for 16 days. Blood sampling and autopsy were performed 2 h after last tamoxifen resp. levonorgestrel and 1 h after last CCl4 dosage. Tamoxifen diminished water content of the healthy liver. By fairly the same ratio it decreased high water content of the damaged liver. Levonorgestrel moderated water imbibition in CCl4 impairment. Tamoxifen caused protein synthesis in healthy and in injured liver. Levonorgestrel could not prevent protein loss associated with CCl4 damage. Tamoxifen counteracted, levonorgestrel moderated glycogen loss in liver lesion. Blood glucose was normal in all examined groups. Cytochrome P-450 decrease in CCl4 injury was moderated but not normalised by tamoxifen. Levonorgestrel was less effective. Cytochrome b5 content diminished in CCl4 lesion and both treatments restored it. Aminopyrine-N-demethylase was impaired by liver injury. An improvement was measured correlating with microsomal cytochrome P-450 content. This was significant with tamoxifen but not following levonorgestrel administration. The pathological serum bilirubin level of CCl4 lesion was normalised by tamoxifen as well as levonorgestrel treatment. The progestogen levonorgestrel moderated liver injury in reducing high water content, glycogen loss and normalising serum bilirubin. The antioestrogen tamoxifen seems to be a promising treatment in chronic hepatic impairment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aminopyrine N-Demethylase↗

Contraception with subdermal implants releasing levonorgestrel. A clinical and pharmacological study.

Two methods for release of levonorgestrel from polydimethylsiloxane (Silastic) subdermal implants for contraception were studied. The first system consists of six 3 cm long Silastic capsules filled with levonorgestrel (NORPLANT). The second one consists of two 4 cm long rods made from Silastic and levonorgestrel, covered with thin Silastic tubing (NORPLANT-2). The contraceptive efficacy of NORPLANT implants was excellent during the four years of observation. That of NORPLANT-2 implants was very good during the first three years, but not acceptable during the fourth year. Both types of implants were well tolerated and the most common side effect experienced was bleeding disturbances such as irregular bleeding and periods of prolonged bleeding. The frequency of such disturbances decreased considerably after the first year of use. The plasma levels of levonorgestrel decreased throughout the study, and did not show any statistically significant difference between users of the two types of implants. The plasma levels of levonorgestrel in women who became pregnant did not differ from those in women who did not become pregnant. Levonorgestrel binds to sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) with high affinity, and in the bound form is not biologically active. A "free levonorgestrel index" (FLI), i.e. the ratio of plasma level of levonorgestrel to SHBG capacity, was calculated. Women with NORPLANT had higher FLI than those with NORPLANT-2 and women who became pregnant had lower FLI than those who did not. It is suggested that NORPLANT-2 implants have a lower rate of release of levonorgestrel than NORPLANT implants. SHBG capacity, thyroid binding proteins and corticosteroid binding globulin decreased during treatment. Plasma total testosterone decreased during treatment, whereas free testosterone was unaltered. Thyroid function and plasma cortisol levels did not change during treatment. Treatment with phenytoin decreased the contraceptive effect. In a group of regularly menstruating women who had used NORPLANT-2 implants for more than three years, 40% showed anovulation, 20% luteinization of unruptured follicles and 40% apparent ovulation.

Adolescent↗

Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation.

BACKGROUND: A previous randomised study suggested that the progestagen, levonorgestrel, given alone in two separate doses each of 0.75 mg caused nausea and vomiting in fewer women and might be more effective than the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception, although the difference was not significant. We compared these two regimens when started within 72 h of unprotected coitus. METHODS: We enrolled in the double-blind, randomised trial 1998 women at 21 centres worldwide. Women with regular menses, not using hormonal contraception, and requesting emergency contraception after one unprotected coitus, received levonorgestrel (0.75 mg, repeated 12 h later) or the Yuzpe regimen (ethinyloestradiol 100 microg plus levonorgestrel 0.5 mg, repeated 12 h later). FINDINGS: Outcome was unknown for 43 women (25 assigned levonorgestrel, 18 assigned Yuzpe regimen). Among the remaining 1955 women, the crude pregnancy rate was 1.1% (11/976) in the levonorgestrel group compared with 3.2% (31/979) in the Yuzpe regimen group. The crude relative risk of pregnancy for levonorgestrel compared with the Yuzpe regimen was 0.36 (95% CI 0.18-0.70). The proportion of pregnancies prevented (compared with the expected number without treatment) was 85% (74-93) with the levonorgestrel regimen and 57% (39-71) with the Yuzpe regimen. Nausea (23.1 vs 50.5%) and vomiting (5.6 vs 18.8%) were significantly less frequent with the levonorgestrel regimen than with the Yuzpe regimen (p<0.01). The efficacy of both treatments declined with increasing time since unprotected coitus (p=0.01). INTERPRETATION: The levonorgestrel regimen was better tolerated and more effective than the current standard in hormonal emergency contraception. With either regimen, the earlier the treatment is given, the more effective it seems to be.

Adult↗

Reduced incidence of rabbit endometrial neoplasia with levonorgestrel implant.

To test the hypothesis that progestogens protect against the development of endometrial neoplasia, we placed polydimethylsiloxane implants (levonorgestrel or inert) into the right uterine horn at random in 114 old female rabbits. Cross-sectional uterine biopsy specimens were taken from both horns at the time of implantation and at 6, 12, and 24 months thereafter. Twenty-nine levonorgestrel-treated and 33 controls survived to the completion of the study. The incidence of endometrial neoplasia of 17.2% in the group treated with levonorgestrel was significantly less (p less than 0.05) than the 42.4% incidence observed in the control does. Before the completion of the study, one levonorgestrel-treated doe died and was found to have an endometrial tumor. When the findings of this doe are included in the report, the statistical significance is marginally lost. No endometrial neoplasia was found in the eight does with serum levonorgestrel concentrations greater than 0.12 ng/ml. Only one of the five tumors in the levonorgestrel-treated group occurred in the horn containing the levonorgestrel implant, which suggests that a dose effect is likely. Treatment with levonorgestrel decreases the incidence of endometrial neoplasia in rabbits. This finding gives further credence to the use of progestogen supplementation in women at risk for developing endometrial neoplasia.

Animals↗

Effects of three combined oral contraceptive preparations containing desogestrel plus ethinyl estradiol on lipid metabolism in comparison with two levonorgestrel preparations.

The effects of three different desogestrel-containing combined oral contraceptive preparations on lipid metabolism were compared with those of two levonorgestrel preparations. The following preparations were studied: (1) monophasic desogestrel (150/30), (2) monophasic desogestrel (150/20, containing 20 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol instead of 30 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol, (3) biphasic desogestrel, (4) monophasic levonorgestrel (150/30), and (5) triphasic levonorgestrel. The effects of these preparations were assessed on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein B, the ratio of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and the ratio of apolipoprotein A-I to apolipoprotein B after 3 months of treatment, and the percentage changes with regard to pretreatment were calculated. The monophasic desogestrel (150/30) and biphasic desogestrel preparations induced higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I levels than did their levonorgestrel-containing counterparts. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were increased in monophasic levonorgestrel and clearly decreased in the lowest ethinyl estradiol-containing monophasic desogestrel (150/20) and biphasic desogestrel preparations. Apolipoprotein B increased in all preparations. The antiatherogenic indexes (ratios of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I to apolipoprotein B were higher for monophasic desogestrel (150/30) and biphasic desogestrel than for comparable levonorgestrel-containing preparations. The differences seen between the desogestrel and levonorgestrel preparations can best be explained by the lower intrinsic androgenicity of 3-keto-desogestrel (active metabolite of desogestrel) than that of levonorgestrel.

Adult↗

Short term suppression of follicular recruitment and spontaneous ovulation in the cat using levonorgestrel versus a GnRH antagonist.

Suppression and subsequent rebound of ovarian activity using a progestin (levonorgestrel; Norplant) versus a GnRH antagonist (antide) was assessed in the domestic cat via fecal estradiol and progesterone metabolite analyses. Following an initial dose-response trial, queens were assigned to one of four treatments: (1) antide, two 6 mg/kg injections 15 days apart (n = 8 cats); (2) levonorgestrel, six silastic rods (36 mg levonorgestrel/rod) implanted for 30 days (n = 8); (3) control injections (n = 5); and (4) control implants (n = 5). Steroid metabolites were quantified from daily fecal samples for 90 days before, 30 days during, and 90 days after treatment. Antide and levonorgestrel inhibited estrous cyclicity in contrast to continued cyclicity in controls. Cats already at estradiol baseline in antide (n = 7) and levonorgestrel (n = 4) groups remained inhibited during treatment. In females with elevated estradiol levels at treatment onset (Day 0), a normal estradiol surge was completed before concentrations declined to baseline (approximately Days 5-7) and remained suppressed throughout the remaining treatment period. Additionally, 56% of treatment animals exhibited at least one spontaneous ovulation during the pre-treatment period, but no female ovulated during treatment with levonorgestrel or antide. Antide-treated cats exhibited lower (P < 0.05) baseline estradiol concentrations during treatment compared to pre- and post-treatment. In contrast, levonorgestrel induced elevations in baseline estradiol following treatment compared to pre- and during treatment intervals. Control females showed no change (P > 0.05) in baseline estradiol throughout the study period. All levonorgestrel and antide cats returned to estrus after treatment withdrawal. Results demonstrate that: (1) both antide and levonorgestrel are effective for inducing short-term suppression of follicular recruitment and ovulation in the cat; (2) inhibition is reversible; and (3) GnRH antagonists and progestins differentially regulate basal estradiol secretion. This study also confirmed a relatively high incidence of spontaneous ovulation in the cat, a species generally considered to be an induced ovulator.

Animals↗

The progestin levonorgestrel induces endothelium-independent relaxation of rabbit jugular vein via inhibition of calcium entry and protein kinase C: role of cyclic AMP.

The progestin and oestrogen component of oral contraceptives have been involved in the development of venous thromboembolic events in women. In the present study we determined the vasoactive effects of sex steroids used in oral contraceptives in isolated preconstricted rabbit jugular veins in the presence of diclofenac and examined the underlying mechanisms. The natural hormone progesterone, the synthetic progestins levonorgestrel, 3-keto-desogestrel, gestodene and chlormadinone acetate, and the synthetic estrogen 17 alpha-ethinyloestradiol induced concentration-dependent relaxations of endothelium-intact veins constricted with U46619. Levonorgestrel also inhibited constrictions evoked by either a high potassium (K(+)) solution or phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) in the absence and presence of extracellular calcium (Ca(2+)). In addition, levonorgestrel depressed contractions evoked by Ca(2+) and reduced (45)Ca(2+) influx in depolarized veins. Relaxations to levonorgestrel in U46619-constricted veins were neither affected by the presence of the endothelium nor by the inhibitor of soluble guanylyl cyclase, NS2028, but were significantly improved either by the selective cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor rolipram or in the absence of diclofenac, and decreased by the protein kinase A inhibitor, Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS. Rolipram also potentiated relaxations to levonorgestrel in PMA-constricted veins in the presence, but not in the absence of extracellular Ca(2+). Levonorgestrel increased levels of cyclic AMP and inhibited PMA-induced activation of protein kinase C in veins. These findings indicate that levonorgestrel caused endothelium-independent relaxations of jugular veins via inhibition of Ca(2+) entry and of protein kinase C activation. In addition, the cyclic AMP effector pathway contributes to the levonorgestrel-induced relaxation possibly by depressing Ca(2+) entry.

15-Hydroxy-11 alpha,9 alpha-(epoxymethano)prosta-5↗

The rabbit as an animal model to study pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel in women.

In an attempt to develop an animal model to facilitate investigations on the effects of various nutritional and environmental factors on the metabolism of the contraceptive steroid levonorgestrel, the pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel were investigated in rabbits. Six adult female rabbits received an intravenous bolus dose of 3H-levonorgestrel, 8-20 microCi, with 15-20 micrograms of carrier cold levonorgestrel per kg body weight. Blood samples were drawn at different intervals of time after the dose and the plasma drug concentration was determined both by radioisotopic dilution method and by radioimmunoassay. Plasma concentrations of levonorgestrel as assayed by radioimmunoassay agreed very closely with those obtained by isotope counting. The decline in plasma radioactivity attributable to unchanged levonorgestrel followed a triexponential pattern. Plasma radioactivity data were therefore analysed according to a three-compartment open model by graphical and regression analysis. The half-lives of the three phases pi, alpha and beta representing the shallow, deep peripheral and the terminal elimination compartment, respectively, were in close agreement with those reported in women. The metabolic clearance rate (MCR) and volume of distribution (VB) of levonorgestrel expressed per unit of body weight were comparable to values reported in women. The overall observed trend of pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel in rabbits resemble closely those seen in women. It would therefore appear that the rabbit is a suitable animal model for studying the effects of nutritional factors on the pharmacokinetics of the drug.

Animals↗

A comparison of flurbiprofen, tranexamic acid, and a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device in the treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia.

Treatment with flurbiprofen (100 mg twice a day for 5 days), tranexamic acid (1.5 gm three times a day for 3 days and 1 gm twice a day for another 2 days), and an intrauterine contraceptive device releasing 20 micrograms levonorgestrel per day was compared in women with idiopathic menorrhagia. The menstrual blood loss during two control periods in 15 women subsequently treated with flurbiprofen and tranexamic acid was 295 +/- 52 ml and 203 +/- 25.2 ml in the 16 women later fitted with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device. Menstrual blood loss was reduced by all three forms of treatment. The reduction in menstrual blood loss expressed as a percentage of the mean of two control cycles for each form of treatment was as follows: flurbiprofen, 20.7% +/- 9.9%; tranexamic acid, 44.4% +/- 8.3%; levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device after 3 months, 81.6% +/- 4.5%; levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device after 6 months, 88.0% +/- 3.1%; levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device after 12 months, 95.8% +/- 1.2%. The reduction in menstrual blood loss achieved by the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device was greater than that recorded with flurbiprofen (p less than 0.001) and tranexamic acid (p less than 0.01), and was greater for tranexamic acid when compared with flurbiprofen (p less than 0.05). The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device was the only form of treatment to reduce mean menstrual blood loss below 80 ml per menstruation, the upper limit of normal menstrual blood loss.

Adult↗

A prospective randomized comparison of levonorgestrel with the Yuzpe regimen in post-coital contraception.

A prospective randomized study was conducted at the Family Planning Association of Hong Kong to compare the efficacy of the Yuzpe regimen and levonorgestrel (0.75 mg for two doses 12 h apart) in post-coital contraception. A total of 424 subjects were recruited into the Yuzpe group and 410 subjects into the levonorgestrel group; 77 subjects in the Yuzpe group and 79 subjects in the levonorgestrel group had further acts of intercourse during the treatment cycle. Fifteen pregnancies (3.5%) occurred in the Yuzpe group and 12 pregnancies (2.9%) in the levonorgestrel group. After excluding the patients who had further acts of intercourse, the failure rates in the Yuzpe group and the levonorgestrel group were 2.6 and 2.4% respectively. The incidence of nausea, vomiting and fatigue in the Yuzpe group was significantly higher than those in the levonorgestrel group. We conclude that levonorgestrel is an effective drug for post-coital contraception with a lower incidence of side-effects than the Yuzpe regimen.

Adolescent↗

Free levonorgestrel index and its relationship with luteal activity during long-term use of Norplant implants.

Levonorgestrel serum levels and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) were measured in 82 women during different years of use of Norplant implants. The ratio between levonorgestrel and SHBG was calculated as an indicator of the free biologically active fraction of levonorgestrel (free levonorgestrel index, FLI). These parameters were then correlated with the presence of luteal activity, as determined by progesterone levels above 9.6 nmol/L, in a sampling run of 10 samples taken twice a week for five consecutive weeks. Levonorgestrel serum levels remained constant around 1.0 nmol/L during the five-year period. SHBG levels were below normal for the first 18 months of use, returning to normal levels during the last three years of use. The FLI in the first two years was significantly higher than that observed in the later years. The frequency of cycles with luteal activity was 12% during the first 2 years, increasing to 44% in the latter years, when FLI levels were lower. Our results suggest that the changes in SHBG and consequently in the free biologically active fraction of levonorgestrel may largely account for the differences in degree of ovarian suppression observed between the first two years of use of Norplant implants and the latter three, even in the absence of a significant variation in total levonorgestrel concentrations.

Drug Implants↗

Lost levonorgestrel IUD: diagnosis and therapy.

A lost intrauterine device (IUD) is an uncommon event. Recently, a new levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system was introduced. In view of several cases of an unusual diagnostic discrepancy in the location of a lost levonorgestrel-releasing IUD in our department, we sought to determine if the extrauterine location of lost levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs differs from that of lost copper IUDs. The medical files of all patients with a diagnosis of lost IUD who were admitted to Rabin Medical Center from 2000 to 2003 were reviewed. Fourteen women were identified, 9 with levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs and 5 with copper IUDs. In six of the nine cases of a lost levonorgestrel-releasing IUD, there was a clear discrepancy between the presumed location of the device by diagnostic evaluation and its actual location on surgical extraction. All six devices were embedded in the omentum; four were located in the upper abdomen. No such discrepancies were noted for the copper IUDs (0 vs. 66%, p < 0.05). No significant difference in peritoneal adhesions was noted between the groups (55% vs. 66%, respectively, p = 0.095). It is concluded that lost levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs are associated with a higher rate of localization errors by clinical evaluation than copper IUDs. Lost levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs might be found in the mid-upper abdomen, embedded in omentum tissue, and this area should be explored first during laparoscopy.

Adult↗