Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Laparotomy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Increased systemic inflammation after laparotomy vs laparoscopy in an animal model of peritonitis.

OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of laparotomy and laparoscopy on local and systemic inflammation in a rat model of peritonitis. DESIGN: Bacteremia, peripheral leukocyte subpopulations, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) plasma levels, and ex vivo secretion of peripheral blood mononuclear cells were investigated after laparotomy and laparoscopy in a prospective randomized experimental study. SETTING: Surgical department of a university hospital. ANIMALS: 60 male inbred Wistar rats. INTERVENTIONS: Standardized fecal inoculum was injected intraperitoneally and rats underwent laparotomy (n=20), laparoscopy (n=20), or no further manipulation (control group, n=20). Blood samples were obtained during the perioperative course to determine bacteremia, leukocytic subpopulations, TNF-alpha plasma levels, and ex vivo secretion. The number of intraperitoneal abscesses was determined in each animal after 1 week. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The hypothesis of the experiment was that laparoscopy with carbon dioxide leads to an increase of local and systemic inflammation in comparison with the laparotomy and control groups. RESULTS: One hour after intervention, bacteremia was significantly higher in the laparotomy and laparoscopy groups compared with the control group (P=.01). Fecal inoculum caused significant monocytopenia and lymphocytopenia in all groups within 1 hour after intervention (P<.05), with complete recovery on day 2 only in the laparoscopy and control groups. Laparotomy caused a significant increase in TNF-alpha plasma levels and decrease of ex vivo production of TNF-alpha compared with the other 2 groups (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Laparotomy and laparoscopy increased the incidence of bacteremia and systemic inflammation in this peritonitis model. The inflammatory response was significantly higher in the laparotomy group compared with the laparoscopy group.

Abdominal Abscess↗
PubMed2005

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumours.

BACKGROUND: Over the last ten years laparoscopy has become an increasingly common approach for the surgical removal of benign ovarian tumours. There remains uncertainty as to the value of this intervention. This review has been undertaken to assess the available evidence for the benefits and harms of laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian tumours compared to laparotomy. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy, safety and cost of laparoscopic surgery compared with laparotomy in women with ovarian tumours assumed to be benign. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched electronic databases, trials registers and reference lists of published trial reports. Review articles were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials comparing laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumours. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers independently assessed each study's eligibility and quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Six randomised controlled trials were identified involving 324 patients. Three subgroups of ovarian tumours were considered: any histological type of benign ovarian tumour, dermoid cysts and endometriomata. Surgical outcomes: The mean duration of surgery was longer in the laparoscopy group compared to the laparotomy group overall (WMD 11.39; 95% CI 0.57 to 22.22). However, heterogeneity was present with substantial inconsistency (I(2)=87%) . The heterogeneity found in these analyses was likely to reflect differences in the patient populations. Adverse effects of surgery: The pooled estimate for febrile morbidity decreased for laparoscopy compared to laparotomy (Peto OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.88). The odds of any adverse effect of surgery (total number of complications - surgical injury and/or post operative complications) were decreased after laparoscopic procedures (Peto OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.55). Short-term recovery: VAS pain scores favoured laparoscopy (WMD -2.36; 95% CI -2.07 to -2.03) andt he odds of being pain free were significantly greater for the laparoscopy group compared to laparotomy (Peto OR 7.35; 95% CI 4.3 to 12.56). Mean length of hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopy group with reduction 2.79 days (95% CI -2.95 to -2.62) compared to laparotomy. Economic outcomes: There was a significant reduction of US$1045 (95% CI -1361 to -726.97) in the laparoscopy group compared to the laparotomy group in one trial of women with any type of benign ovarian tumour. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In women undergoing surgery for benign ovarian tumours, laparoscopy is associated with a reduction in the following; febrile morbidity, urinary tract infection, post operative complications, post operative pain, days in hospital and total cost. These findings should be interpreted with caution as only a small number of studies were identified including a total of only 324 women and not all of the important outcomes were reported in each study.

Female↗
PubMed1995

Tumor growth after laparotomy or laparoscopy. A preliminary study.

We investigated the effects of laparotomy and insufflation on tumor establishment and growth in a murine model. Twenty female mice received intradermal inoculation of a low dose of tumor cells (2 x 10(3)) derived from the MC2 mouse mammary carcinoma cell line. Ten of these mice underwent laparotomy and ten received intraperitoneal insufflation with carbon dioxide gas at a pressure of 5 mmHg for 30 min. Tumor growth was followed postoperatively. By postoperative day 14, tumors had grown in zero of the ten insufflated mice and in seven of the ten laparotomy-group mice (P < 0.005). By postoperative day 30, tumors had grown in one of the ten insufflated mice and in eight of the ten laparotomy-group mice (P < 0.007). Ten additional mice received a high-dose inoculum of cells (1 x 10(6)) followed by either laparotomy or intraperitoneal insufflation. Upon sacrifice 12 days later, all mice had developed tumors, but the laparotomy group's tumors were almost three times as large, by mass, as tumors in the insufflated group (70.5 +/- 23.5 mg vs 25.8 +/- 9.5 mg; P < 0.02). These results suggest that laparotomy confers a permissive effect on tumor establishment and growth in a murine model not seen after peritoneal insufflation. We hypothesize that this may be a function of relative immunosuppression following laparotomy which is not present following peritoneal insufflation. These data may be important when choosing a route of access to the peritoneal cavity for cancer resection.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Small-incision (mini-laparotomy) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study in a university hospital.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy into general practice in 1990, it has rapidly become the dominant procedure for gallbladder surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the results of the laparoscopic, open and mini-laparotomy approaches to cholecystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study covers a period of 6 years. A total of 1,276 patients underwent cholecystectomy for calculous biliary disease. The laparoscopic procedure was applied to 952 (74.6%) patients, while 210 (16.5%) underwent the traditional open cholecystectomy and the remaining 114 (8.9%) patients underwent mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (3.9%) from the laparoscopic group required conversion to open cholecystectomy. Morbidity was similar in the open and laparoscopic groups (3.8%), while it was significantly lower in the mini-laparotomy group (0.8%). No major bile duct injuries occurred after the open or mini-laparotomy approaches. The median operation time was significantly shorter in the mini-laparotomy group than in the laparoscopic group (46 min vs 61 min). Hospital stay was significantly longer for the open cholecystectomy group (mean value 5.1 days) compared with the laparoscopic and mini-laparotomy groups (mean values 2.5 days and 2.7 days, respectively). Hospital expenses showed a saving of 786 Euro for each patient who underwent the open procedure and 980 Euro for each patient who underwent the mini-laparotomy approach compared with the laparoscopic one. CONCLUSION: We believe that commissioners of healthcare should question whether the benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy justify the additional cost after the introduction of the mini-laparotomy approach.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Higher colon cancer tumor proliferative index and lower tumor cell death rate in mice undergoing laparotomy versus insufflation.

BACKGROUND: Our laboratory has previously shown that tumors are established more easily and grow larger after laparotomy than after laparoscopy. To characterize these differences in tumor growth further, the tumor cell death rates and tumor proliferation rates were compared in vivo after full sham laparotomy versus carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation. METHODS: Female Balb/C mice (n = 36) were inoculated intradermally in the dorsal skin with 106 C-26 colon adenocarcinoma cells in 0.1 ml of culture media no more than 1 h before interventions. The mice then were randomized to one of three groups: anesthesia control, CO2 insufflation, or sham laparotomy. The anesthesia control group underwent no procedure. The insufflation group underwent CO2 pneumoperitoneum (4-6 mmHg) for 20 min via a 20-gauge angiocatheter. The laparotomy group underwent a midline incision from xiphoid to pubis, which was closed after 20 min. Tumors were excised from half the mice in each group on postoperative day 7, and from the remaining mice on postoperative day 14. Sections of tumors were made then stained separately for free 3? hydroxyl ends of genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) using fluorescein-deoxyunidine triphosphate (dUTP), and immunohistochemically for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Apoptosis was measured by quantitating DNA strand breaks in individual cells using fluorescence microscopy. Fluorescein-positive cells in five random high-power fields (x200) were counted in a blinded fashion. The proliferative index of each tumor was determined by averaging PCNA positive cells in five high-power fields (x450) counted in a blinded fashion with the aid of an optical grid. RESULTS: On postoperative day 7, there was no significant difference in the proliferative index or apoptotic rates among the three groups. On postoperative day 14, the proliferative index in the laparotomy group was significantly higher than in either the insufflation or control group (p < 0.001). The proliferative index in the insufflation group also was significantly higher than in the control group (p < 0.05). Inverse differences in apoptotic rates were found. The apoptotic rate in the laparotomy group was significantly lower than in either the insufflation (p < 0.05) or control group (p < 0.001). The apoptotic rate in the insufflation group was significantly lower than in the control group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that there is a significantly higher rate of tumor cell proliferation and a significantly lower rate of tumor cell death with the C-26 colon adenocarcinoma tumor line after laparotomy than after insufflation or anesthesia alone on post-operative day 14. The mechanisms of these phenomena are unclear. It appears that certain factors postoperatively stimulate tumors to proliferate at a higher rate, causing tumor cells to die at a lower rate in the laparotomy group than in the insufflation group.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

Cost analysis of diagnostic laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the evaluation of penetrating abdominal trauma.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic laparoscopy for the evaluation of injuries in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma has been shown to decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with mandatory laparotomy. The overall impact on patient care and hospital costs has not been thoroughly investigated. The goal of this study was to determine the economic impact of laparoscopy as a diagnostic tool in the management of patients following penetrating trauma to the abdomen or flank. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating trauma to the abdomen or flank, but without other injuries requiring emergent intervention, admitted to a level I trauma center between January 1, 1992, and September 30, 1994. Those patients who underwent either laparoscopy (DL) or laparotomy (NL) or both (CONV) and who had no intraabdominal organ injuries requiring surgical therapeutic intervention were included in the study. Age, operative time, operative findings, length of hospitalization, Injury Severity Score (ISS), variable costs, and total costs were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent negative/nontherapeutic laparoscopy (DL), 19 patients underwent negative/nontherapeutic laparotomy (NL), and four patients underwent both laparoscopy and laparotomy, a conversion procedure (CONV). There was no significant difference in age, operative times, or ISS between the DL and NL groups. Mean ISS of CONV patients was significantly greater than that of DL patients, 5.75 +/- 1.97 vs 2.43 +/- 0.63 (p < 0.05). Mean operative time for CONV patients was also significantly greater than both DL and NL patients, 106.5 +/- 17.00 min vs 66.1 +/- 6.55 and 47. 3 +/- 7.50 min, respectively (p < 0.05). The mean length of stay was significantly shorter in the DL group as compared to the NL or CONV groups, 1.43 +/- 0.20 vs 4.26 +/- 0.31 and 5.0 +/- 0.82 (p < 0.0001). The variable costs for the DL group were significantly lower than those incurred by patients in the NL and CONV groups, $2,917 +/- 175 vs $3,384 +/- 102 and $3,774 +/- 286, (p < 0.05). Variable costs were not significantly different between the NL and CONV groups. Total costs were also significantly lower in the DL group when compared to NL and CONV, $5,427 +/- 394 vs $7,026 +/- 251 and $7,855 +/- 750 (p < 0.005), but again, they were not statistically different between the NL and CONV groups. The overall total costs for laparoscopy, including the costs incurred by conversion patients, was significantly less than the total costs for laparotomy patients, $5,664 +/- 394 vs $7,028.47 +/- 250 (p < 0.005). This resulted in an overall savings of $1,059.44 per laparoscopy performed. The overall negative/nontherapeutic laparotomy rate during this study was 19.1%, which was significantly lower than the negative or nontherapeutic exploration rate during the time period prior to the use of laparoscopy (p < 0.01, z = 2.550). CONCLUSION: Variable and total costs and length of stay were significantly lower in our population of patients who underwent DL as compared to NL. The rate of negative or nontherapeutic laparotomy was also significantly reduced when compared to the rate identified during the era prior to the use of laparoscopy. Laparoscopy resulted in an overall savings of $1,059 per laparoscopy performed when compared to laparotomy.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1986

A review of second-look laparotomy for ovarian cancer.

One hundred twenty-seven patients underwent second-look laparotomies from July 1969 to June 1982. To be included in this report they must have met the following criteria: a documented ovarian neoplasm; previous surgery; adequate chemotherapy for cessation if no disease was found; and no X-ray, chemical, or clinical evidence of disease including an exam under anesthesia. Forty-one percent had residual disease at second-look laparotomy. The original stage and the percentage of tumor debulked at initial surgery were inversely related to the likelihood of finding residual disease. Age, histologic type and grade, and type of chemotherapy did not show a significant relationship with the likelihood of disease persisting. Recurrent tumor was subsequently detected in 16% of patients who had been found to be free of disease at second-look laparotomy. Of thirty stage III and IV patients treated with combinations containing cis-platinum, 10 (33%) had recurrences. This rate of recurrence was significantly greater than the 17.6% recurrence rate in 17 patients with Stage III and IV disease whose chemotherapy consisted of single alkylating agents or with combinations without cis-platinum. Twenty patients underwent a third-look laparotomy after completion of additional chemotherapy. Nine were found to have no residual disease. Two of the nine (22%) subsequently had recurrence of disease. Three of the eleven patients with persistent disease at the time of a third-look laparotomy underwent a fourth-look laparotomy. All were found free of disease and none have recurred. Six (55%) of those with persistent disease at the third-look laparotomy have died despite continued therapy. The ability to successfully treat some patients with persistent disease continues to be a justification for the use of a second-look laparotomy. However, the high rate of recurrence after cessation of treatment following the finding of no residual disease raises the question of whether it is appropriate to discontinue all therapy at this time.

Alkylating Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in endometrial cancer: first analysis of survival of a randomized prospective study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopy has been proved to be safe and reliable in staging of patients with endometrial cancer. It has definite advantages over laparotomy, but a comparable survival outcome is still to be verified in prospective randomized trials. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Department of Gynecology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-two women with uterine cancer. INTERVENTIONS: Laparotomy and laparoscopy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were allocated to the laparoscopy arm, and 59 were allocated to the laparotomy arm. Median follow-up for all patients was 44 months (range 5-96 months). Eight patients (12.6%) in the laparoscopy group had a recurrence versus five patients (8.5%) in the laparotomy group (p = .65). At median follow-up, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the laparoscopy group and laparotomy group were 87.4% versus 91.6% and 82.7% versus 86.5%, respectively. Cause-specific survival (CSS) was 90.5% in the laparoscopy group versus 94.9% in the laparotomy group. In patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I, DFS was 91.2% in the laparoscopy group versus 93.8% in the laparotomy group, OS was 86.5% versus 89.7%, and CSS was 93.4% versus 95.9%. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic vaginal treatment of patients with endometrial cancer provides a survival outcome comparable with laparotomy. If these data are confirmed, laparoscopic procedures should be included in routine therapy for patients with endometrial cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1985

Second-look laparotomy after chemotherapy in the management of ovarian malignancy.

Eighty-eight patients with ovarian malignancy underwent second-look laparotomy as part of their plan of management at Indiana University Hospital. Thirty-five patients (39.8%) were found to have no gross or microscopic evidence of persistent neoplasm, and an additional 16 (18.2%) had only microscopic tumor. Patients with initial Stage III or IV disease were less likely to have negative findings at laparotomy than were patients with Stage I or II disease. A complete initial cytoreductive operation (residual disease = 0 cm) correlated positively with negative findings at laparotomy. Endometrioid histologic findings were associated with a favorable condition at the second look, but tumor grade was associated with superior survival only for patients with grade 0 disease. Eight of 30 patients (26.7%) with invasive carcinoma and negative findings at second-look laparotomy have had tumor recurrence (2 to 63 months), and five of eight have died. Intraperitoneal chromic phosphorus salvage therapy for patients with microscopic disease was promising, with eight of 15 treated patients (53.3%) alive after therapy, with no evidence of disease from 16 to 56 months after the second look. Second-look laparotomy has been the major determinant of continued or alternative therapy for patients with ovarian malignancy. Second-look laparotomy has been incorporated into the standard management plan without a formal clinical trial. The need for a second look may be reduced by identifying patients who do not benefit from the procedure. Patients with persistent disease confirmed by noninvasive means can continue therapy without laparotomy. There is also a subgroup of patients with a favorable prognosis whose therapy could be safely discontinued without laparotomy.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

The role of second-look laparotomy in the long-term survival in ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: To elucidate the role of second-look laparotomy in the management of ovarian cancer patients, were retrospectively reviewed our experience with this procedure in epithelial ovarian cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The hospital records of 617 patients with advanced ovarian cancer were reviewed. The 308 patients who underwent second-look laparotomy were followed from four to 18 years with a median follow-up of 12 years after start of primary chemotherapy. RESULTS: Patients who achieved pathological complete response (PCR), microscopic partial response (PPR mic.), macroscopic partial response (PPR mac.), stable disease (PSD), and progressive disease (PPD) at second-look laparotomy had a median survival time of 149, 39.5, 24, 14, and eight months, respectively. Secondary surgical cytoreduction could be performed only in 101 patients with macroscopic persistent disease. The group of all patients with secondary tumor debulking had no survival advantage compared with the group of patients with PPR mac., PSD, and PPD, unable to have secondary cytoreduction. Patients left with no tumor after second-look laparotomy did not survive as long as patients who achieved PCR and PPR mic. at second-look laparotomy. Factors prolonging survival after second-look laparotomy included younger age, good pre-treatment performance status, smaller primary residual tumor size, longer interval between start of chemotherapy and second-look laparotomy, and the pathologically proven CR or PR mic. CONCLUSION: Second-look laparotomy appears to have a minor role in the routine management of ovarian cancer patients, especially in the context of the limited effectiveness of second-line therapy. This procedure should be limited to clinical treatment protocols to determine effectiveness of new agents.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

A novel method of ninth-intercostal microlaparoscopic approach for patients with previous laparotomy.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the availability of a primary laparoscopic approach for a patient with previous laparotomy and to assess postoperative adhesion to the abdominal wall.. METHODS: A total of 172 patients with a history of laparotomy who were undergoing laparoscopic surgery in our hospital were evaluated. The primary trocar insertion was performed via the ninth-intercostal microlaparoscopic approach for these patients. RESULTS: This procedure could be performed on all patients and there were no complications. Postoperative abdominal wall adhesion was found in 53 (30.8%) of 172 patients, and periumbilical adhesion was found in 16 patients (9.3%). Among the 172 patients, 150, 19, and three patients had undergone laparotomy once, twice, and thrice, respectively, prior to this study. Considering the number of previous laparotomies, the frequency of periumbilical adhesion was 5.3% (eight of 150 patients), 36.8% (seven of 19 patients), and 33.3% (one of three patients), respectively. Among 150 patients who had undergone laparotomy once, the type of laparotomy was an obstetric-and-gynecologic surgery in 126 patients and other surgeries in 24 patients. There was no significance in the frequency of adhesion between types of previous laparotomies. Surgical incisions were classified as median infra-umbilical incision (94 patients), median supra-umbilical incision (three patients), Pfannenstiel's incision (33 patients), para-rectal incision (15 patients), and peri-rectal incision (five patients). A high frequency of periumbilical adhesion was recognized in the all three median supra-umbilical incisions. CONCLUSION: Ninth-intercostal microlaparoscopic approach is safe for laparoscopic surgery in patients who have undergone laparotomy previously, and this procedure could prevent the risk of bowel injury.

Abdominal Wall↗
PubMed2001

Diagnostic laparoscopy decreases the rate of unnecessary laparotomies and reduces hospital costs in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The use of laparoscopy for the treatment of various surgical diseases has been well described, and recently, it has gained popularity in the evaluation of abdominal trauma patients. The value of diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) in avoiding unnecessary laparotomies and its effects on hospital costs was evaluated in a prospective clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a 48-month period, 99 hemodynamically stable abdominal trauma patients (28 blunt and 71 penetrating injuries) among 428 patients admitted with abdominal trauma in whom the decision for surgical exploration was made were accepted for the study and underwent DL prior to laparotomy. RESULTS: The DL was negative in 60.7% of the patients with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) and in 62.0% of the patients with penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT). Laparoscopy-positive patients (Group 1) underwent immediate laparotomy, whereas on DL-negative patients (Group 2), no laparotomies were performed. Hospitalization times and hospital costs of the two groups were recorded and compared. The difference between the hospitalization times of Group 1 and Group 2 was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The use of DL reduced the rate of unnecessary laparotomies from 60.7% to 0 in BAT and from 78.9% to 16.9% in PAT. The mean hospitalization time was 2.75 +/- 1.20 days in patients with negative DL, whereas it was 7.4 +/- 2.20 days and 5.2 +/- 1.42 days in DL-positive patients undergoing a therapeutic and nontherapeutic laparotomy, respectively. When the hospital costs of the Group 1 patients were compared with those of Group 2 patients, there was a 4.07-fold increase in patients undergoing therapeutic laparotomy and a 1.78-fold increase in patients undergoing nontherapeutic laparotomy. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic laparoscopy might be used in selected patients to exclude significant intra-abdominal injuries.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2003

The role of interventional radiology in patients requiring damage control laparotomy.

BACKGROUND: Interventional angiography has been used as a less invasive alternative to surgery to control hemorrhage resulting from trauma. This retrospective study analyzed the role of interventional radiology in patients requiring damage control laparotomy. METHODS: Twenty patients underwent damage control laparotomy between January 1994 and May 2001. Eight of the 20 patients also underwent angiographic evaluation and treatment before or after the damage control laparotomy. RESULTS: Three patients underwent angiography before damage control laparotomy, because a large, pelvic retroperitoneal hematoma was seen on computed tomographic scan, and the amount of intraperitoneal blood seemed insufficient to account for the magnitude of the patient's hemodynamic instability. Five patients underwent angiography after damage control laparotomy. The indication was a nonexpanding retroperitoneal hematoma in three patients, a nonexpanding hepatic hilar hematoma in one patient, and a hepatic injury associated with cirrhosis in one patient. Lumbar artery injuries were identified and treated by embolization in three patients. Four of the eight patients who underwent both damage control laparotomy and angiography survived. CONCLUSION: Angiography before damage control laparotomy may be indicated to control retroperitoneal pelvic hemorrhage in hemodynamically unstable patients who have insufficient intraperitoneal blood loss to account for their hemodynamic instability. Angiography after damage control laparotomy should be considered when a nonexpanding, inaccessible hematoma is found at operation in a patient with a coagulopathy.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1989

Place of second-look laparotomy after 18 courses of chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Thirty-two patients with epithelial carcinoma of the ovary underwent a second-look laparotomy after the completion of an average of 18 courses of adjuvant chemotherapy. Nine patients (28%) were found to have persistent disease. This low rate of positive second-look laparotomy is probably because these patients received chemotherapy for 18 months and in those patients whose tumour did not respond to the medication, the disease would progress and the patient died without becoming a candidate for laparotomy. There was no stage Ic patient whose second-look laparotomy was positive and the need for second-look laparotomy is questionable in such patients. Stage III/IV patients and patients with recurrence had a significantly higher positive second-look laparotomy rate than stage Ic/II patients, 44% and 7% respectively. In the present group of patients with positive tumour at second-look laparotomy, 33% responded to further debulking operation and chemotherapy and remained disease free 15-33 months after completion of their second line chemotherapy treatment. For second-look laparotomy to be of maximum benefit to the patient, we recommend that it be performed after 12 courses of chemotherapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The use of a mini-laparotomy in total abdominal colectomy for mucosal ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Minimally invasive surgery, with its advantages of early return to normal activity and good cosmetic results, is an important goal in the treatment of patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes utilizing a mini-laparotomy approach to total abdominal colectomy for mucosal ulcerative colitis with those of the conventional approach. METHODOLOGY: Eleven patients scheduled to undergo the first (total abdominal colectomy) of a 2 or 3-stage operation for mucosal ulcerative colitis via a mini-laparotomy between 1999 and 2001 were prospectively studied. The mini-laparotomy described here involves total abdominal colectomy performed through a skin incision shorter than 7 cm. Seven similar patients who underwent conventional laparotomy between 1995 and 1998 served as the control group. RESULTS: The mini-laparotomy approach was accomplished in 9 patients (81.8%). Patient characteristics between cases and controls were similar. Postoperative intervals until standing, walking, flatus, urinary catheter removal, and tolerance of solid diet were significantly shorter in the mini-laparotomy group (P = 0.031, P = 0.023, P = 0.0033, P = 0.0093, and P = 0.023, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A mini-laparotomy approach to total abdominal colectomy appears feasible and safe in selected patient with mucosal ulcerative colitis and poses an attractive alternative to conventional laparotomy in patients similar to those presented here.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Laser laparoscopy versus laparotomy in lysis of pelvic adhesions.

Severe adhesions were induced at laparotomy by laser ablation of the surface of one uterine horn and 1 cm2 of pelvic sidewall in 20 rabbits. Three weeks later the rabbits were selected at random for laparoscopy or laparotomy. Adhesions at the horn, sidewall and incidental sites were scored and lysed with laser at similar power densities. Three weeks later animals were killed and adhesions were blindly scored. We found a significant and similar reduction in severe adhesions at uterine horns after either laser laparoscopy or laser laparotomy, better lysis of sidewall and incidental adhesions by laser laparoscopy and formation of de novo adhesions at nonoperative sites after laparotomy but not after laparoscopy. We conclude that (1) de novo adhesions are common after laparotomy; (2) severe uterine horn adhesions can be reduced equally well by both laparoscopy and laparotomy but laparoscopy is superior to laparotomy with less severe peripheral adhesions; (3) outcome of adhesiolysis depends on several variables, including adhesion density and location and approach (laparotomy or laparoscopy), even when the tool (laser) is constant.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Nontherapeutic laparotomies revisited.

A wide variability exists in the reported incidents of complications following nontherapeutic laparotomy for trauma. We undertook this study to examine the decision-making leading to and complication rates related to the use of nontherapeutic laparotomy in an era of nonoperative management. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all nontherapeutic laparotomies as defined by the operating surgeon performed between May 1998 and May 2001. A total of 50 patients (6%) underwent nontherapeutic laparotomies predominantly for penetrating injury. The most frequent preoperative reason for nontherapeutic laparotomy was the question of hollow viscous or diaphragmatic injury on preoperative studies. Peritoneal signs on examination and peritoneal penetration on wound exploration were also frequent indications for surgery. Significant complication rates were low at approximately 12 per cent. Total length of stay was 7.3 days and 5 days if patients with significant other associative injuries were excluded. Overall morality was 4 per cent and unrelated to the nontherapeutic laparotomy in all cases. Overall incidence of nontherapeutic laparotomy has decreased with the use of abdominal helical CT and triple-contrast CT to evaluate penetrating injuries. Despite these advances diaphragmatic and hollow viscous injuries remain a concern. Although overall serious complication rates were low the use of nontherapeutic laparotomy adds significantly to length of stay and complications.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1992

[Ultrasonographic finding of hemoperitoneum and indication for laparotomy in blunt abdominal trauma].

The usefulness of the ultrasonography (US) for the indication for laparotomy was evaluated. I analyzed 200 blunt trauma patients who took US exams at my emergency center immediately after admission. Ninety-five percent of patients with hemodynamic instability, whose hemoperitoneum was revealed by US, underwent laparotomy. No negative laparotomy was performed in those patients. Only 5.4% of US hemoperitoneum-negative patients with stable hemodynamics required laparotomy because of peritoneal irritation or the evidence of traumatic diaphragmatic hernia. US hemoperitoneum-positive patients with stable hemodynamics were treated selectively, and 46% of such patients eventually underwent laparotomy, depending on findings of serial US, CT, DPL and Intravenous urogram. In two third of them laparotomy was indicated because of serial US showing the appearance or increase in hemoperitoneum. The maximum width of echo free space in Morison's pouch became more than 10 mm in the all exams when the laparotomy was indicated. I believe that US finding of hemoperitoneum should be an integral part of evaluating laparotomy indications in blunt abdominal trauma.

Abdominal Injuries↗