Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Infliximab”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Risks and benefits of infliximab for the treatment of Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Infliximab is effective for the treatment of active Crohn's disease. However, rare but serious complications related to infliximab therapy including lymphoma, sepsis, and death have been reported. The purpose of this study was to analyze the risks and benefits of infliximab for the treatment of Crohn's disease with the goal of providing data to aid both physicians and patients in the process of making a decision about treatment. METHODS: A decision analytic model was constructed to determine the risks and benefits of infliximab when compared with standard therapy. The analysis simulated 2 cohorts of 100,000 patients each, with one arm receiving infliximab while the other remained on standard therapy. RESULTS: Model results showed that in 100,000 patients at 1 year, infliximab will lead to 12,216 more patients in remission, 4255 fewer surgeries, and 33 fewer deaths from flares of disease. This is at the cost of 201 more lymphomas and 249 more deaths related to complications from infliximab. Overall, the infliximab strategy resulted in more quality-adjusted life years (QALYs/patient) than the standard therapy strategy (.77 QALYs/patient vs .75 QALYs/patient). CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increased risk of lymphoma and death associated with use of infliximab, the substantial clinical improvement and fewer surgeries as a result of infliximab result in an increase in QALYs. In properly selected patients, the benefits of infliximab could outweigh its risks. These data should help guide decision making and the informed consent process when considering the use of infliximab for the treatment of Crohn's disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Association of trough serum infliximab to clinical outcome after scheduled maintenance treatment for Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The effect of infliximab infused at scheduled intervals on antibody formation, preinfusion trough serum concentrations of infliximab, and their clinical significance was evaluated in patients with Crohn's disease. METHODS: Antibodies to infliximab and trough serum infliximab were measured in 105 patients with Crohn's disease treated with 5 mg/kg infliximab for induction followed by maintenance episodic re-treatment (n = 23) or scheduled therapy at 6- to 8-week intervals (n = 82). RESULTS: After a median of 14 infusions (range, 2-45), 21% of patients had detectable antibodies, 25% were antibody negative, and 54% were antibody inconclusive. Antibody formation was higher after episodic compared with scheduled treatment (39% vs 16%; P = .036) and was associated with a higher rate of infusion reactions (50% vs 21%; P = .018). Ninety patients continued maintenance scheduled therapy beyond 12 months including 12 converted episodic patients, with a median follow-up of 23 months (range, 16-68 months). The rate of clinical remission was higher for patients with a detectable trough serum infliximab compared with patients in whom serum infliximab was undetectable, including those without antibodies (82% vs 6%; P < .001). A detectable trough serum infliximab was also associated with a lower C-reactive protein (2.0 vs 11.8 mug/L; P < .001) and a higher rate of endoscopic improvement (88% vs 33%; P < .001). Concurrent immunomodulators did not alter outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: For Crohn's disease patients treated with scheduled maintenance infusions of infliximab, the trough serum concentration of infliximab predicts clinical outcome. Factors in addition to antibody formation, likely pharmacokinetic, modulate serum infliximab and thus the response to infliximab therapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Retrospective study of the costs of care during the first year of therapy with etanercept or infliximab among patients aged > or =65 years with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to retrospectively examine the costs of therapy with etanercept and infliximab, among patients aged > or = 65 years with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), from a health-care system perspective. METHODS: Data from 2 large, automated US health-care claims databases (Constella COMPASS and Ingenix LabRx) were pooled for the analyses. Each database is comprised of paid facility, professional service, and retail (ie, outpatient) pharmacy claims from participating health plans. Using the 2 databases, all RA patients aged > =65 years were identified who began therapy with etanercept or infliximab between July 1, 1999 (Constella COMPASS), or January 1, 2001 (Ingenix LabRx), and December 31, 2002. Costs of RA-related care (including study drugs, selected medications, and outpatient encounters for RA) and non-RA-related care (all other medications and services) for patients in the 2 treatment groups were assessed, in US dollars, over a 1-year period after therapy initiation. RESULTS: A total of 280 RA patients aged > or = 65 years initiated therapy with etanercept (n = 99) or infliximab (n = 181) and met all other selection criteria. Etanercept patients were younger than infliximab patients (mean [SD] age, 70.5 [4.6] vs 71.8 [4.6] years; P = 0.04), were less likely to be enrolled in a managed care organization (76.7% vs 87.8%; P < 0.01), and had fewer pretreatment rheumatologist visits (mean [SD], 1.3 [2.3] vs 2.2 [3.8]; P = 0.04). Other characteristics, including pretreatment levels of other types of health-care utilization, were generally similar. Mean (95% CI) total cost of RA-related care was lower for etanercept patients in both databases (US 12,159 dollars [US 10,795 dollars-US 13,380 dollars] for etanercept vs US 22,347 dollars [US 20,808 dollars-US 23,912 dollars] for infliximab in one, and US 14,297 [US 12,238 dollars-US 16,326 dollars] for etanercept vs US 22,154 dollars [US 19,688 dollars-US 24,703 dollars] for infliximab in the other), primarily due to lower costs of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy (US 10,015 dollars [US 8754 dollars-US 11,224 dollars] for etanercept vs US 18,611 dollars [US 17,169 dollars-US 20,023 dollars] for infliximab in one database; US 11,917 dollars [US 10,128 dollars-US 13,480 dollars] for etanercept vs US 16,759 dollars [US 14,551 dollars-US 19,062 dollars] for infliximab in the other). Mean (95% CI) costs of non-RA-related care were similar among etanercept and infliximab patients in both databases (US 13,100 dollars [US 8956 dollars-US 18,377 dollars] for etanercept vs US 11,789 dollars [US 8326 dollars-US 16,001 dollars] for infliximab in one, and US 16,665 dollars [US 10,329 dollars-US 25,690 dollars] for etanercept vs US 13,959 dollars [US 10,216 dollars-US 18,168 dollars] for infliximab in the other). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that costs of RA-related care during the first year of therapy may be lower among RA patients aged > or =65 years receiving etanercept versus infliximab, a difference attributable primarily to lower costs of drug acquisition.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Infliximab for hospitalized patients with severe ulcerative colitis.

To evaluate the efficacy of infliximab in hospitalized ulcerative colitis (UC) patients refractory to intravenous corticosteroids. Treatment options for steroid-refractory UC patients are limited and include cyclosporine and colectomy. Although two recent studies (ACT I/II) demonstrate a benefit from infliximab in outpatients with moderate to severely active UC, the utility of infliximab in severe i.v. steroid-refractory UC is less clear. We report our open-label experience with infliximab in hospitalized UC patients at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. All hospitalized UC patients who had received infliximab were identified. Age, sex, extent of UC, duration of disease, concomitant medication, hospital course, and response to infliximab were recorded. Response to infliximab was defined as avoidance of colectomy and cessation of corticosteroids. There were 12 UC inpatients refractory to intravenous corticosteroids and subsequently treated with infliximab. Nine of the 12 patients (75%) failed to respond to infliximab and required a colectomy; median time to colectomy was 3 months. Three patients (25%) did respond to infliximab and were able to withdraw from corticosteroids. In this open-label analysis, infliximab was not effective for the majority of UC patients refractory to intravenous corticosteroids. Whether earlier use of infliximab would prevent the need for hospitalization and colectomy is uncertain.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Infliximab in pediatric ulcerative colitis: two-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: The role of infliximab in treating pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC) is not defined. The authors previously have described their experience with the open label use of infliximab in nine children with moderate to severe UC. The aim of this study was to describe the outcome of these patients after a minimum 2-year follow-up and to describe the responses of eight additional patients to this medication. METHODS: The authors reviewed all pediatric patients with UC who received infliximab at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from its first use until February 2003. Tolerance of the infusions and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Follow-up information for a minimum of 2 years was reviewed for the nine initial patients. A total of 73 infliximab infusions were administered to these patients. Seven of nine (78%) patients were considered to be responders to the initial dose of infliximab. Two of these patients became nonresponders within 9 months of the first dose of infliximab and underwent colectomy. Of the remaining five (56%) patients with sustained response, two continue to receive infliximab infusions and three are doing well without infliximab. One patient experienced an infusion reaction, and one experienced herpes zoster infection. We have treated eight additional UC patients with infliximab. Seven (88%) patients were considered responders. One responder experienced relapse within 2 months. Overall, a short-term improvement was seen in 14 of 17 (82%) patients, and sustained improvement in 10 of 16 (63%) patients followed up for more than 9 months. All five patients with severe or fulminant UC, unresponsive to 2 weeks of intravenous corticosteroid therapy, experienced improvement with infliximab. Infliximab was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Infliximab is associated with short- and long-term clinical improvement in children and adolescents with moderate to severe UC.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Infliximab dependency in a national cohort of children with Crohn's disease.

AIM: The aim was to evaluate the pattern of responsiveness and to monitor side effects of episodic administration of infliximab in children with active Crohn's disease (CD) treated in Denmark from 1999 to 2003. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The National Danish Crohn Colitis Database of infliximab was used to identify all Danish CD patients treated at pediatric departments with infliximab. The clinical outcome was assessed by pattern recognition of the disease course 30 days after the first infliximab infusion and 90 days after intended end of treatment. RESULTS: During a 3 year period, infliximab was given to 24 CD patients (9 male/15 female) aged median 15.4 (range 9.8-18.6) years with a median disease duration of 26 (range 0.7-93) months and a median number of infusions of 6 (range 2-11). Five milligrams of infliximab per kilogram infusions were given intravenously. Immediate response was as follows: 8 (33%) patients achieved complete response (CR), 10 (42%) partial response (PR), and 6 (25%) no response (NR). Long-term response was as follows: 7 (29%) patients achieved prolonged response (PRO), defined as maintenance of CR or PR, 10 (42%) were infliximab dependent (ID), defined as relapse of symptoms requiring reinfusions of infliximab to regain CR or PR, and 6 (25%) had NR. Six (25%) patients needed surgery during or after treatment with infliximab. Side effects were seen in four (17%) patients. No serious events were noted. CONCLUSION: Seventy-one percent of the children appeared to benefit (PRO or ID) from infliximab treatment with minor side effects when given episodically. Among these patients, two response patterns were recognized: PRO after ending infliximab treatment (29%) or dependency on reinfusions of infliximab (42%).

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Infliximab: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in rheumatoid arthritis.

Infliximab (Remicade), a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), binds to and inhibits the activity of tumour necrosis factor-alpha, which is thought to play an important role in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Intravenous infliximab plus methotrexate is recommended in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have not achieved satisfactory disease control with adequate courses of other DMARDs. Pharmacoeconomic analyses have been based on efficacy data from the pivotal placebo-controlled Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor Trial in Rheumatoid Arthritis with Concomitant Therapy (ATTRACT) trial in patients with active, refractory rheumatoid arthritis. Infliximab every 8 weeks plus methotrexate demonstrated rapid and sustainable improvements in clinical response, delayed radiographic progression, and/or improved functional status and health-related QOL compared with placebo plus methotrexate at weeks 30, 54 and 102. In cost-utility analyses of infliximab plus methotrexate conducted from a healthcare payer and/or societal perspective in the US, Europe, Portugal, Sweden and the UK, infliximab 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks plus methotrexate was associated with acceptable (<$US50,000 per discounted QALY gained) cost-utility ratios relative to methotrexate alone in patients with active, refractory rheumatoid arthritis. When only direct costs were considered, the lifetime incremental cost per discounted QALY gained with infliximab plus methotrexate relative to methotrexate alone was $US30,500-38,700 (year of costing 1998 or not reported; treatment duration 54 or 102 weeks or lifelong) in the US and Europe analyses, and euro39 500 (year of costing not reported; lifelong treatment) in the Portuguese analysis. The cost-utility ratios were more favourable when lost productivity costs or the additional benefit of infliximab on radiographic stabilisation were considered. In the Swedish and UK analyses with a 10-year time horizon, infliximab plus methotrexate for 1 or 2 years was associated with cost-utility ratios of euro28 600-56 100 (year of costing not reported) when direct costs were considered, and euro3440-48 200 when direct costs plus loss-of-productivity costs were considered. In conclusion, cost-utility analyses, which were based on modelling of data from the pivotal clinical trial of infliximab plus methotrexate, indicate that infliximab plus methotrexate is associated with acceptable cost-effectiveness ratios (<$US50,000 per discounted QALY gained) relative to methotrexate monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who have not responded to previous methotrexate or other DMARD therapy. The cost effectiveness of infliximab versus other DMARDs is at present unclear, but will be clarified when appropriate data from directly comparative clinical and/or pharmacoeconomic studies become available. In patients in whom adequate courses of other DMARDs have failed to achieve satisfactory disease control, infliximab plus methotrexate may prevent or delay disability, which may produce reductions in nondrug costs that can help offset its acquisition cost.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2005

Pattern of infliximab utilization in rheumatoid arthritis patients at an academic medical center.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pattern of use of infliximab with an emphasis on treatment escalation and the durability of infliximab use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in an academic setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of pharmacy and medical records of 183 patients with RA who received at least 1 infliximab infusion at the infusion centers of the Brigham and Women's Hospital. Treatment escalation was defined as an increase in the dosage of infliximab to >3 mg/kg and/or a decrease in the dosing interval to <7 weeks between infusions. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients with RA received infliximab infusions for a mean +/- SD duration of 58.2 +/- 56.6 weeks. Infliximab was discontinued in 48% of the patients during the first year of therapy and in 67% of the patients overall. A total of 126 patients had a treatment escalation, including 25 patients with a dose increase, 35 patients with a decrease in the interval, and 66 patients with both. Infliximab treatment was associated with a decrease in corticosteroid and methotrexate doses. Patients who had a treatment escalation were more likely to continue infliximab infusions compared with patients without a treatment escalation (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0-4.1). CONCLUSION: The use of infliximab may be an effective treatment for RA; however, a substantial number of patients will discontinue its use. Treatment escalation is commonly used in the management of RA with infliximab and is associated with longer duration of infliximab use.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2007

Safety and tolerability of concurrent natalizumab treatment for patients with Crohn's disease not in remission while receiving infliximab.

BACKGROUND: Natalizumab, a humanized monoclonal IgG(4) antibody to alpha4 integrin, was investigated as a treatment of active Crohn's disease (CD). The safety of natalizumab given in combination with infliximab has not previously been studied. METHODS: Seventy-nine adult patients with active CD (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] score > or = 150) despite ongoing infliximab treatment were randomized 2:1 to receive 3 intravenous infusions of natalizumab (300 mg; n = 52) or placebo (n = 27) every 4 weeks. Patients received infliximab (5 mg/kg) every 8 weeks for at least 10 weeks before randomization and throughout the study. The primary objective was to assess the short-term safety and tolerability of natalizumab in patients concurrently receiving infliximab. Secondary and tertiary objectives included measures of efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and effects on inflammatory markers. A subset of patients also participated in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis of the effects of concurrent treatment. RESULTS: Incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar in the treatment groups. AEs frequently reported in both groups were headache, CD exacerbation, nausea, and nasopharyngitis. No patient had a hypersensitivity-like reaction to natalizumab, whereas 4 patients (5%) experienced reactions to infliximab. Two patients (4%) developed anti-natalizumab antibodies; 10 patients (14%) developed anti-infliximab antibodies. The mean CDAI score decreased with natalizumab plus infliximab but was unchanged with infliximab alone (-37.7 versus +3.5; P = 0.084). Patients in both groups showed small increases in HRQoL (P = 0.811). No drug-drug interactions were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of natalizumab plus infliximab was well tolerated. Several positive trends suggested that treating patients not in remission with infliximab plus natalizumab had greater efficacy than treatment with infliximab alone.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Fistulating anal Crohn's disease: results of combined surgical and infliximab treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Infliximab is a monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor-alpha, which has been shown to be effective in fistulating Crohn's disease. The safety of infliximab in patients with potential perianal sepsis is uncertain. This study was designed to assess the safety and outcome of infliximab therapy combined with surgery for patients with fistulating anal Crohn's disease. METHODS: All patients receiving infliximab for fistulating anal Crohn's disease between 2000 and 2004 were studied. Patients' demographics, clinical findings, magnetic resonance imaging, and examination under anesthesia were recorded. Perianal Crohn's disease activity index before and 8 to 12 weeks after three infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg) were recorded. Routine policy was to insert drainage seton sutures at the time of preinfliximab examination under anesthesia and then remove it after the second infusion. Complications of treatment and outcome at the last clinic follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients underwent infliximab treatment (6 males; median age, 35 (range, 16-60) years). Twenty-one patients had preinfliximab examination under anesthesia: 12 required abscess drainage; 17 had at least one drainage seton suture inserted. Fourteen patients underwent pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging to identify clinically occult collections. All but one patient were established on immunomodulator therapy before infliximab treatment. Perianal Crohn's disease activity index improved significantly after infliximab infusion (preinfusion: median, 11, range, 8-17; postinfusion: median, 8, range, 5-16; P<0.001). There were no serious complications of infliximab treatment. At median follow-up of 21 (range, 4-31) months, only four patients achieved sustained fistula healing. Five patients have required defunctioning or proctectomy. Four patients have required repeated infusions of infliximab. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab therapy in combination with examination under anesthesia/seton drainage is a safe and effective short-term treatment for fistulating anal Crohn's disease. Long-term fistula healing rates are low.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Infliximab use in luminal Crohn's disease.

Infliximab has been available in the United States and Europe for more than 6 years, and its use has revolutionized the care of patients who have CD. It is used effectively for both the induction and maintenance of remission in patients who have CD and is efficacious in patients who have steroid-dependent/refractory CD and those who have fistulizing CD. Clinical trials and practice have shown infliximab to be safe, effective, and generally well tolerated. The ACCENT I and ACCENT II trials defined the best dosing and schedule regimens for its administration. With up to 30% of patients not responding to infliximab therapy, much attention has been devoted to identifying risk factors that could allow optimization of response rates. Parsi and colleagues and Arnott and colleagues demonstrated that nonsmoking and the concurrent use of immunomodulators are predictors of response to infliximab. Research has also focused on identifying biologic and immunologic markers that may correlate with response to infliximab. To date, N0D2/CARD15, anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody (ASCA), and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) have not been shown to be predictive of outcome with infliximab treatment for CD. Gene polymorphisms also are being studies with the hope that knowing the patient's genotype may help predict the course or severity of the disease, including the presence of extraintestinal manifestations, response to treatments, and susceptibility to toxicities. No single variable, however, has been consistently demonstrated to be a predictor of response to infliximab. The formation of ATIs in a small number of patients creates a clinical dilemma. ATIs have been associated with an attenuated response or loss of response to the medication over time and the development of both acute and delayed infusion reactions that occasionally are severe enough to lead to discontinuation of the medication. In such patients physicians are often left to ponder what therapy to try next. Adalimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody used for treating rheumatologic conditions, has been investigated as an alternate treatment for patients who have CD who, after initially responding to infliximab, experience intolerance or loss of efficacy. Two studies have examined the use of adalimumab in patients who have active CD who had lost response to or developed intolerance to infliximab. In both these studies adalimumab was well tolerated and seemed to be a clinically beneficial option for such patients. Confirmation of these findings with ongoing randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials is needed, however. The limits of conventional treatment for CD can be seen as a positive evolutionary force favoring the development and use of advanced therapies. The acceptance of antimetabolites began with data published a quarter-century ago and became robust in the past 5 to 10 years. Biologic therapy has become the standard of care at a far faster rate. The success seen with infliximab has broadened the acceptance of biologic therapy among professional peers, patients, and pharmaceutical developers. The lessons learned in the years since infliximab's arrival show the importance of long-term data in revealing important toxicities and best practices for maintenance. Tempered by this experience, the short cycle from concept to drug production possible with biologic therapies should bring even more advanced treatments to patients quickly while investigators work to find a cure.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗
PubMed1999

Efficacy and safety of retreatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody (infliximab) to maintain remission in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Infliximab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, rapidly reduces signs and symptoms of active Crohn's disease. The aim of this study was to determine whether repeated infusions of infliximab would effectively and safely maintain the remitting benefit. METHODS: The efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of 4 repeated treatments with 10 mg/kg infliximab given every 8 weeks were compared with the effects of placebo in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial. Seventy-three patients with active Crohn's disease who had not adequately responded to conventional therapies and then had demonstrated a clinical response (>/=70-point decrease in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index) to an initial infusion of infliximab (or placebo) were studied. RESULTS: Retreatment with infliximab maintained the clinical benefit through the retreatment period and 8 weeks after the last infusion in nearly all patients retreated with infliximab. Median values for Crohn's Disease Activity Index, inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (a quality of life measurement), and serum C-reactive protein concentration were maintained at remission levels with infliximab retreatment, but not with placebo retreatment. Retreatment with infliximab every 8 weeks maintained serum infliximab concentration and was well tolerated with a low incidence of immunogenicity. One case of lymphoma and 1 case of suspected lupus were reported; the complete long-term safety profile of infliximab requires additional clinical investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with infliximab showed efficacy and tolerability in managing symptoms of patients with active Crohn's disease not responding to conventional treatments.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Effects of infliximab on apoptosis and reverse signaling of monocytes from healthy individuals and patients with Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVES: Infliximab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibody, might exert some of its long-term therapeutic effects in Crohn's disease (CD) by interacting directly with cells of the immune system such as monocytes and T lymphocytes via membrane TNF and by inducing apoptosis. Accordingly, the effects of inflix-imab on monocyte apoptosis and down-regulation of proinflammatory cytokines (reverse signaling) were assessed. METHODS: To assess apoptosis, monocytes from healthy individuals (controls) and CD patients were incubated in the presence or absence of infliximab or the apoptotic agent gliotoxin for 24 hours. Annexin V staining and the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP-FITC nick end labeling assay were used to measure early and late apoptosis. To measure the effects of infliximab on reverse signaling, monocytes from healthy individuals pretreated in vitro with infliximab were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide or staphylococcal enterotoxin A, and the induction of the proinflammatory cytokines, TNF-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, and IL-8 was measured by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The effect of in vivo infliximab treatment of monocytes was similarly determined by comparing the responses of monocytes from CD patients before and immediately after infliximab infusion. RESULTS: Infliximab did not induce apoptosis of monocytes from either healthy individuals or CD patients but rather stabilized them. However, monocytes from healthy individuals treated with infliximab in vitro, or from CD patients infused with infliximab, produced significantly less TNF and other proinflammatory cytokines when stimulated with the bacterial products lipopolysaccharide and staphylococcal enterotoxin A. CONCLUSIONS: Apoptosis of monocytes is not responsible for the therapeutic effects of infliximab. However, some of the therapeutic effects of infliximab may be caused by its ability to down-regulate proinflammatory cytokines production by monocytes exposed to bacterial antigens.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2005

Clinical evolution of luminal and perianal Crohn's disease after inducing remission with infliximab: how long should patients be treated?

BACKGROUND: Few data are available regarding the evolution of Crohn's disease after discontinuing a successful course of infliximab. AIM: To evaluate clinical outcome of Crohn's disease after induction of remission with three infliximab infusions (luminal disease) and after maintenance of remission with 1-year course of infliximab every 8 weeks (luminal and perianal). METHODS: Twenty-three patients with active luminal Crohn's disease who responded to three infusions of infliximab (0, 2, and 6 weeks), and 23 patients with sustained response to infliximab every 8 weeks during 1 year, were included. Patients were followed-up until relapse or for at least 6 months after infliximab discontinuation. Clinical outcomes and factors associated to relapse were evaluated. RESULTS: In luminal Crohn's disease, a three-infusion infliximab regimen achieved a sustained response in most patients, especially if a complete response occurred at the time of the third infusion. In patients treated for 1-year, infliximab discontinuation was also successful, with a cumulative probability of being free of relapse of 69% at 12 months. In perianal disease, early relapse was the rule after stopping infliximab treatment, with only 34% of patient maintaining remission at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Short regimens of infliximab might be evaluated in patients with luminal Crohn's disease. However, infliximab discontinuation is not recommended in perianal Crohn's disease, because of a high rate of early relapse.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2007

Systematic review: Infliximab therapy in ulcerative colitis.

AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and tolerance of infliximab in ulcerative colitis. METHODS SELECTION OF STUDIES: evaluating efficacy of infliximab in ulcerative colitis. For the meta-analysis, randomized clinical trials comparing infliximab vs. placebo/steroids. SEARCH STRATEGY: electronic and manual. Study quality: independently assessed by two reviewers. DATA SYNTHESIS: meta-analysis combining the odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: Thirty-four studies (896 patients) evaluated infliximab therapy in UC, with heterogeneous results. Mean short-term (2.3 weeks) response and remission with infliximab was 68% (95% CI 65-71%) and 40% (36-44%). Mean long-term (8.9 months) response and remission was 53% (49-56%) and 39% (35-42%). Five randomized double-blind studies compared infliximab with placebo, the meta-analysis showing an advantage (P < 0.001) of infliximab in all endpoints (short-/long-term response/remission): ORs from 2.7 to 4.6, and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) from 3 to 5. Similar infliximab response was calculated independently of the indication (steroid-refractory/non-steroid-refractory) or the dose (5/10 mg/kg). Adverse effects were reported in 83% and 75% of the infliximab and placebo-treated patients (OR = 1.52; 95% CI 1.03-2.24; number-needed-to-harm (NNH) was 14). CONCLUSION: Infliximab is more effective than placebo, with an NNT from 3 to 5, for the treatment of moderate-to-severe UC, achieving clinical remission in 40% of the patients at approximately 9 months of follow-up. Further studies are necessary to confirm the long-term efficacy of infliximab in ulcerative colitis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Immunomodulators and "on demand" therapy with infliximab in Crohn's disease: clinical experience with 400 infusions.

OBJECTIVES: Infliximab has been proven effective for treatment of active Crohn's and fistulizing Crohn's disease. We reviewed our experience with infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease to determine if its combination with immunomodulators leads to better response and longer periods of disease quiescence. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 122 patients with Crohn's disease who received infliximab infusions. Data were collected on patient demographics, clinical response to infliximab, fistula response, prednisone dose, infusion reactions/side effects, concomitant immunomodulator therapy, and time intervals between infliximab infusions. RESULTS: Of 122 patients receiving infliximab infusions, 117 completed more than 2 wk of follow-up (400 infusions), and five patients had no follow-up. Co-therapies included azathioprine (AZA) in 47 (40.2%) patients, 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) in 11 (9.4%), methotrexate (MTX) in 23 (19.7%), prednisone in 64 (54.7%), mesalamine in 51 (43.6%), and antibiotics in 16 (13.7%). Mean follow-up was 52 wk (14-864 days). Overall response rate to infliximab was similar between patients receiving immunomodulators (AZA/6-MP 87.9%, MTX 82.6%) and patients receiving infliximab alone (75%), although there was a trend toward higher response with AZA/6-MP (p = 0.10). More frequent drug reactions/side effects occurred in the infliximab alone group (22.2%) compared with patients receiving MTX (13.0%) and AZA/6-MP (13.8%), but this was not statistically significant. Prednisone dosage was reduced from a mean of 19.5 mg to 7.5 mg per day overall (p < 0.05). Fistula response and dosing intervals were not affected by concomitant immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of immunomodulators with infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease did not improve patient response to several parameters measured, including clinical response rate, dose reduction of prednisone, fistula response, and mean intervals between infliximab infusions.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Defective mucosal T cell death is sustainably reverted by infliximab in a caspase dependent pathway in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To verify whether targeting defective mucosal T cell death underlies the sustained therapeutic benefit of infliximab in Crohn's disease, we explored its in vivo proapoptotic effect after 10 weeks of treatment, and its in vitro killing activity on lamina propria T cells (LPT) and peripheral blood T cells (PBT), both isolated from Crohn's disease patients. METHODS: Endoscopic intestinal biopsies were collected from 10 Crohn's disease patients (six steroid refractory and four fistulising) before and after three consecutive infusions of infliximab, administered at week 0, 2, and 6 in a single intravenous dose (5 mg/kg), and from 10 subjects who proved to have functional diarrhoea. Apoptosis was determined in vivo by TUNEL assay, and in vitro by fluorescein isothiocyanate-annexin V/propidium iodide staining on LPT and PBT from Crohn's disease patients cultured with infliximab. The effect of the broad caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK and the neutralising anti-Fas antibody ZB4 was tested in vitro on LPT and PBT treated with infliximab. Caspase-3 activity was determined by immunoblotting. RESULTS: In Crohn's disease patients, infliximab treatment induced a sustained LPT apoptosis, still evident four weeks after the last infusion. In vitro infliximab induced death of LPT from Crohn's disease patients occurred via apoptosis rather than necrosis. LPT showed a higher susceptibility to infliximab induced apoptosis than PBT in Crohn's disease patients. The signalling pathway underlying the restoration of infliximab induced LPT apoptosis occurred via the caspase pathway but not Fas-Fas ligand interaction in Crohn's disease. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that apoptosis is the major mechanism by which infliximab exerts its killing activity on LPT in Crohn's disease. The sustained LPT proapoptotic action of infliximab, which extends far beyond its circulating half life, may be responsible for the sustained remission induced in Crohn's disease patients by infliximab retreatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Infliximab: a review of its use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

UNLABELLED: Infliximab is a chimaeric monoclonal antibody to human tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha). It binds to both soluble and transmembrane forms of TNFalpha at picomolar concentrations in vitro. Secondary to inhibition of TNFalpha, infliximab reduces serum levels of inflammatory mediators and vascular endothelial growth factor, decreases the expression of chemokines in the synovial tissue and reduces lymphocyte migration into the joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In 2 multicentre randomised double-blind trials conducted over 26 and 30 weeks, infliximab plus methotrexate was significantly more effective than placebo plus methotrexate according to American College of Rheumatology response criteria in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. A substantial response to infliximab-containing regimens was evident within 2 weeks. Extension phases of these studies indicate sustained clinical efficacy for up to 54 weeks. Of considerable importance are preliminary 1-year radiographic findings that show zero median progression of joint damage in infliximab plus methotrexate recipients compared with a 7 to 8% deterioration in placebo plus methotrexate recipients. Headache, nausea, upper respiratory tract infection and infusion-related reactions are the most commonly reported adverse events with infliximab. Serious events occurred in 4.4% of infliximab versus 1.8% of placebo recipients. In the largest clinical trial, 2 patients died from disseminated infection and 3 developed new or recurrent malignancies, although the exact relationship between infliximab and these events is unknown. To date, 2 patients with rheumatoid arthritis have developed drug-induced lupus. About 10% of patients may develop antibodies to infliximab, although the clinical significance of these is presently unknown. CONCLUSION: Infliximab represents an important advance in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, with tolerability concerns raised by early studies having been eased somewhat by more recent data in larger patient numbers. If preliminary results indicating that infliximab is able to arrest joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are corroborated, the drug will likely become an integral component of future management strategies for this difficult-to-treat condition.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗