Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Indinavir”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of indinavir with or without low-dose ritonavir in HIV-infected Thai patients.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of indinavir with or without low-dose ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected Thai patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six HIV-1-infected patients who participated in HIV-NAT 005 study gave informed consent to record a pharmacokinetic curve 4 weeks after starting a regimen containing either indinavir 800 mg every 8 h (n = 19) or indinavir 800 mg + ritonavir 100 mg every 12 h (n = 17). Indinavir plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by non-compartmental methods. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range; IQR) body weight of the 36 patients (11 females and 25 males) was 60 (54-72) kg. Median and IQR values for indinavir AUC, Cmax and Cmin were 20.9 (13.1-27.0) mg x h/L, 8.1 (6.6-9.4) mg/L and 0.13 (0.09-0.27) mg/L, respectively, for indinavir 800 mg every 8 h, and 49.2 (42.5-60.4) mg x h/L, 10.6 (8.5-13.2) mg/L and 0.68 (0.43-0.77) mg/L, respectively, for indinavir 800 mg + ritonavir 100 mg every 12 h. These values are not largely different from values found in Caucasian patients, with the exception of relatively high peak levels of indinavir in Thai subjects. Cut-off values for optimal virological efficacy were an indinavir Cmin of 0.10 and 0.25 mg/L for the every 8 h and the every 12 h regimen, respectively; patients with an indinavir AUC greater than 30 (every 8 h regimen) or 60 (every 12 h regimen) mg x h/L were at increased risk of developing nephrotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Indinavir pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in Thai HIV-1-infected patients are similar to those described in Caucasian patients, despite an overall lower body weight in this population

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Low-doses of indinavir boosted with ritonavir in HIV-infected Thai patients: pharmacokinetics, efficacy and tolerability.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the steady-state pharmacokinetics of two reduced doses of indinavir boosted with ritonavir (indinavir/ritonavir) in HIV-infected Thai patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen immunocompromised antiretroviral-naive patients (6 males, 7 females) initiated 600/100 mg indinavir/ritonavir, zidovudine and lamivudine, every 12 h. After 1 month, blood samples were taken at pre-dose, and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 12 h after drug intake. Indinavir dosing was then reduced to 400 mg (twice daily) and 1 week later an identical series of samples were drawn. Patients then resumed 600 mg of indinavir. HIV-1 RNA viral load was determined at 8, 24 and 48 weeks. Indinavir plasma levels were determined by HPLC and pharmacokinetic parameters by non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: Median (range) weight was 58 kg (51-73) for men and 53 kg (46-59) for women. On 600 mg of indinavir, median indinavir AUC, C(max), and C(min) were 39.3 mg.h/L (20.6-50.5), 6.2 mg/L (3.7-9.0) and 0.41 mg/L (0.12-0.77), respectively, and on indinavir 400 mg, 18.3 mg.h/L (11.1-33.0), 3.8 mg/L (2.2-7.8) and 0.17 mg/L (0.10-0.39), respectively. No renal complications were observed. At 48 weeks, 6/13 (46%) patients had stopped 600 mg of indinavir due to intolerability (gastrointestinal and cutaneous), and 5/7 (71%) patients had a HIV-1 viral load <50 copies/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced doses of indinavir/ritonavir maintained adequate indinavir plasma levels compared to current guidelines suggesting that these doses are efficacious in this setting. Considering the poor tolerability of 600 mg of indinavir, the 400 mg of indinavir may be preferred due to its lower exposure indices but long-term efficacy data are needed.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Determination of indinavir, a HIV-1 protease inhibitor, in human plasma using ion-pair reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.

Indinavir is widely prescribed as a component of potent antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Because virologic failure of therapy can result from subtherapeutic drug levels, monitoring of indinavir levels may be important in clinical management. We have developed a simple, accurate, and precise high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay for measurement of indinavir concentration in human plasma. In our method, indinavir was extracted from plasma with dichloromethane at pH 10.4, which resulted in quantitative recovery of indinavir and the internal standard (IS), methyl-indinavir (86% and 80%-97%, respectively). Chromatographic separation was accomplished using a Luna C18 (2) (Phenomenex) analytic column with a mobile phase composed of acetonitrile:phosphate buffer (25 mM) and 0.2% triethylamine pH 7.0 (34.5:65.5, v/v). Ion-paired reagent triethylamine was necessary to ensure an appropriate retention time for indinavir and differentiate it from other protease inhibitors that were coextracted. Quantification was performed at 210 nm. The standard curves were linear (r2>0.999) over the concentration range 25-5,000 ng/mL, when 1-mL aliquots of plasma were extracted. Inter- and intraday coefficients of variation were acceptable. The assay was used to determine trough and peak levels of in plasma from 12 subjects who received indinavir 1200 mg every 12 hours, 1000 mg every 12 hours, or 800 mg every 8 hours. The concentrations of indinavir found in this study (trough 26-768 ng/mL; peak at 1 hr 3,309-17,568 ng/mL) has a wider range than defined previously (trough 50-300 ng/mL; peak 6,000-12,000 ng/mL). This study illustrates three potential uses of indinavir monitoring: to assess individual dosing regimen, to assess patient compliance, and to monitor unusual indinavir levels caused by changed drug clearance.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2000

Saliva as a specimen for monitoring compliance but not for predicting plasma concentrations in patients with HIV treated with indinavir.

The presence of the HIV-protease inhibitor indinavir in saliva was analyzed to investigate whether salivary indinavir concentrations are applicable to monitor compliance and/or predict plasma indinavir levels. Fourteen HIV-infected outpatients treated with indinavir and 24 healthy volunteers who ingested a single dose of indinavir were included. Paired plasma and citric-acid-stimulated saliva samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Stimulated salivary indinavir concentrations showed a high correlation (r = 0.85, p < 0.01) with corresponding plasma levels. The median saliva/plasma ratio was 65% (P25 50%; P75 94%). The ratios were independent of the plasma concentration; however, a relation with time after ingestion was seen. The unbound fraction of indinavir in plasma was not significantly correlated with the saliva/plasma ratio after stimulated saliva collection, in contrast with a subset of nonstimulated saliva from healthy volunteers, where we did find a significant correlation. Although stimulated salivary indinavir concentrations are highly correlated with plasma concentrations, it is not possible to predict plasma indinavir levels by the salivary concentrations for purposes of therapeutic drug monitoring, due to large interindividual and intraindividual variation. Nevertheless, monitoring compliance by measuring the presence of indinavir in saliva is possible: ingestion of indinavir can be assessed with a sensitivity of 84.8% in the whole dosing interval or with 98.8% between 1 and 6 hours after the last dose, which is comparable with plasma.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

In-vitro crystallization of indinavir in the presence of ritonavir and as a function of pH.

The aim of this study was to investigate the in-vitro crystallization of indinavir as a function of pH alteration and in the presence of another protease inhibitor, ritonavir. Crystallization processes were studied for indinavir sulfate, indinavir free base and a commercial indinavir capsule dosage form, respectively. Crystallization induction times were determined with varying initial concentration of supersaturated solution, and in the presence or absence of seed material. In-vitro induction times were found to be significantly shorter for the indinavir capsule dosage form compared with that of indinavir sulfate and indinavir free base. Induction times were inversely proportional to the final concentration in pH 7 buffer for all materials, and were significantly shortened in the presence of seeds. The crystal morphology of indinavir varied under different crystallization conditions. This study demonstrated the potential for precipitation of indinavir upon pH elevation, while also suggesting that the presence of impurities or seeding material significantly shortens the induction time for indinavir crystal formation. This induction time period falls well within the gastric emptying time following the intake of a high-caloric meal, and within small intestinal transit time. The results of this study are in agreement with the clinical observation that a high-calorie protein meal significantly reduces the oral bioavailability of indinavir in man, accompanying a pH elevation in the stomach.

Capsules↗
PubMed2000

Symptomatic crystalluria associated with indinavir.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of severe and recurrent crystalluria resulting from the use of indinavir and to review the literature describing this adverse effect. CASE SUMMARY: A 26-year-old HIV-positive white woman had recurrent episodes of left-sided flank pain accompanied by dilation of the left renal collecting system while undergoing treatment with a triple-drug regimen including indinavir 1200 mg every 12 hours (full dosage). Typical indinavir crystalluria was observed, with no evidence of stones. Acute episodes were treated with intravenous fluids, diclofenac, and ciprofloxacin. Crystalluria and clinical symptoms eventually resolved with withdrawal of indinavir and substitution with a different protease inhibitor. Renal function remained normal. DISCUSSION: A wide spectrum of disorders of the urinary tract can occur in subjects taking indinavir, with potentially severe complications caused by crystalluria and stones. Indinavir is excreted in the urine; the low solubility of those crystals is the critical factor accounting for the risk of stone formation. An elevated pH with a reduced excretion of citric acid contributes to the low urinary solubility of indinavir. Pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs, leading to elevated plasma concentrations of indinavir, and dehydration could also increase the risk of stone formation. The impact on renal function can be unfavorable over the long-term period. Cornerstones of treatment and prevention are increased fluid intake and possibly urinary acidification. Emergency drainage may be required for patients with severe obstruction. Reducing the dosage of indinavir has been proposed, but this carries the risk of viral mutations with development of resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with indinavir can result in crystalluria with potentially severe obstruction. All patients taking indinavir, not only those with documented crystalluria or renal effects from the drug, should greatly increase their fluid intake and have renal function checked at baseline and then monitored regularly. Urinalysis also should be performed regularly for appropriate monitoring and prevention.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Indinavir-induced retinoid-like effects: incidence, clinical features and management.

Since 1998, many cases of antiretroviral therapy-related paronychia of the toes or fingers and ingrown toenails have been reported. Most of them were related to indinavir. Other indinavir-induced mucocutaneous disorders resembling the adverse effects of systemic retinoid therapy have also been reported. Although there is some uncertainty in the literature regarding a cause-effect relationship, results of several epidemiological and in vitro studies, together with cumulated clinical experience leave no doubt that indinavir causes a retinoid-like effect and nail alterations. Indeed, indinavir is the only antiretroviral drug that produces these disorders, although ritonavir may enhance indinavir-induced retinoid-like effects through pharmacokinetic interactions leading to increased plasma indinavir concentrations. Approximately 30% of patients receiving indinavir show two or more retinoid-like manifestations and 4-9% develop paronychia. These adverse effects are not related to other epidemiological variables such as the patient's sex, age or other risk factors or immune status. They seem to be exposure dependent and, therefore, largely dose-dependent. Chronic paronychia is considered generally to be caused by contact irritants and candidal infection. Nevertheless, indinavir is currently the most frequent cause of chronic or recurrent paronychia in HIV-infected patients. In addition, retinoid-like manifestations such as cutaneous xerosis and cheilitis are frequent mucocutaneous adverse effects related to indinavir. The exact mechanism of indinavir-induced retinoid-like effects is unclear. Hypotheses for pathogenesis include interference with retinoid metabolism by enhancing the retinoic acid signalling pathway, or by increasing retinoic acid synthesis, or by reducing cytochrome p450-mediated retinoic acid oxidative metabolism. Replacement of therapy by an antiretroviral regimen not containing indinavir, while retaining other protease inhibitors and lamivudine, resolves retinoid-like manifestations without recurrences.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2002

Risk factors for urological symptoms in a cohort of users of the HIV protease inhibitor indinavir sulfate: the ATHENA cohort.

BACKGROUND: Nephrolithiasis is a well-known complication of indinavir treatment and may result in urological symptoms ranging from renal colic to renal insufficiency. OBJECTIVE: To obtain further knowledge regarding the incidence and risk factors of urological symptoms associated with indinavir sulfate use. METHODS: This study was performed in the ATHENA (AIDS Therapy Evaluation National AIDS Therapy Evaluation Centre) cohort of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) receiving antiretroviral therapy in the Netherlands. The incidence rate of urological symptoms was assessed in a subcohort of 1219 patients starting HIV protease inhibitor treatment after 1996. Urological symptoms were defined as an initial report of nephrolithiasis, renal colic, flank pain, hematuria, renal insufficiency, or nephropathy. Using multivariate Cox regression analysis, risk factors for urological symptoms during indinavir treatment were subsequently studied among the subset of 644 patients who started indinavir treatment after 1996. RESULTS: The incidence of urological symptoms was 8.3 per 100 treatment-years for indinavir vs 0.8 per 100 treatment-years for other HIV protease inhibitors. Risk factors for urological symptoms during indinavir treatment were low weight (relative risk [RR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.9), low lean body mass (RR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.9), undetectable HIV-1 RNA when starting indinavir treatment (RR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.5-6.0), prior treatment change because of intolerance (RR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-5.1), indinavir regimens of 1000 mg or more twice daily (RR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3-8.2), and warm environmental temperatures (RR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.7-8.8). Risk estimates were highest among patients with a low lean body mass. CONCLUSION: Increased alertness for urological symptoms is warranted for patients starting indinavir treatment, particularly among those with a low lean body mass, during indinavir regimens of 1000 mg or more twice daily, and in warm weather environments.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

A co-culture-based model of human blood-brain barrier: application to active transport of indinavir and in vivo-in vitro correlation.

The growing array of in vitro models of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) which have been used makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions concerning the BBB penetration of HIV-1 protease inhibitors. What is needed is a combined in vivo and in vitro study on biological models that mimic as closely as possible the normal human BBB, to establish whether and how indinavir crosses the BBB. We developed a new human BBB model using primary endothelial cells and astrocytes. The biological relevance of this model was checked with respect on the one hand, to the close relationship between the log of drug permeability coefficient normalized to molecular weight and the log of the 1-octanol/water partition coefficient, and on the other hand to the functional P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression. We employed this model to perform transport studies with indinavir and showed that the rate of in vitro indinavir transport from the basal to apical compartment was higher than the rate of apical to basal transport. Pretreatment of the BBB model with the P-gp inhibitor, quinidine, significantly increased apical to basal transport. Intracellular indinavir accumulation was increased in BBB as a result of inhibition of active transport. These data were correlated with the indinavir-mediated P-gp ATPase modulation showing that indinavir specifically interacted with a binding site on P-gp. Moreover, the activation of P-gp ATPase by indinavir was inhibited by quinidine. In addition, the in vivo brain to plasma concentration ratio of indinavir into mice showed that indinavir concentration was up to five times higher in the brain of mdr1a(-/-) mice than in the brain of mdr1a(+/+) mice. All these results confirm the role of P-gp in preventing the passage of indinavir across BBB and thus its entry into the central nervous system (CNS). Our human BBB model represents a useful tool for the evaluation of drug penetration into the CNS.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B↗
PubMed1998

Visceral abdominal-fat accumulation associated with use of indinavir.

BACKGROUND: After the addition of the protease inhibitor indinavir to combination drug regimens for HIV-1 infection, some patients have experienced an increase in abdominal girth with symptoms of abdominal fullness, distension, or bloating. We aimed to find out whether this collection of symptoms was associated with changes in abdominal fat and whether such changes were associated with indinavir use. METHODS: Abdominal computed tomography was used in ten HIV-1-positive patients who had such abdominal symptoms to measure total adipose tissue (TAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) at the umbilicus (L4 vertebral level). The VAT:TAT ratio in the ten cases was compared with that in ten HIV-1-infected patients who had been using indinavir without abdominal symptoms for at least 6 months and ten HIV-1-infected patients who were not using indinavir. FINDINGS: The mean VAT:TAT ratios for the three groups-non-users, symptom-free indinavir users, and symptomatic indinavir users-were 0.40 (SD 0.15), 0.59 (0.18), and 0.70 (0.20), respectively (p=0.004). The VAT:TAT ratio correlated with duration of indinavir use (r=0.47, p=0.01). The mean areas of VAT for the three groups were 106 cm2 (SD 72), 141 cm2 (65) and 202 cm2 (93), respectively (p=0.03). The mean body-mass index of the groups was similar, and patients in the two indinavir groups did not gain a significant amount of weight after starting the drug. Serum triglyceride values increased after starting indinavir and correlated with VAT:TAT ratios. INTERPRETATION: Our data suggest that some HIV-1-infected patients on indinavir treatment accumulate intra-abdominal fat that may cause abdominal symptoms. Recent evidence suggests that other HIV-1 protease inhibitors may be associated with changes in body-fat distribution. Larger studies of protease-inhibitor treatment are needed to investigate this association further and to investigate metabolic or endocrine mechanisms that may underlie this phenomenon.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2001

Incidence and risk factors for the development of indinavir-associated renal complications.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence and risk factors for the development of indinavir-associated renal complications (IRC), and subsequent clinical outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study based on two large HIV centres in London. Eligible patients received indinavir for at least 1 week between 1 December 1995 and 28 February 1999. Development of IRC was ascertained by case-note review. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox Proportional Hazard's model analysis were used to determine independent risk factors for the development of IRC. RESULTS: 781 patients were eligible. Median CD4 count and viral load at indinavir initiation were 117 x 10(6) cells/L and 47 332 copies/mL, respectively. Median indinavir exposure was 53 weeks (IQR: 20-83). Many patients received other potentially nephrotoxic drugs during indinavir treatment: co-trimoxazole (46%), aciclovir (33%) or both (20%). Overall IRC incidence was 7.3% (6.7 per 100 person-years indinavir exposure). Cases presented with loin pain (58%), renal colic (42%) or dysuria (19%). Identified precipitating events (26%) included fluid depletion or altered indinavir regimen. In the majority of cases indinavir therapy was continued and there was no progressive rise in creatinine levels. In the multivariate analysis, for indinavir treatment >74 weeks there was a reduced risk of developing IRC (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.09-0.57, P = 0.001). Concomitant aciclovir increased the IRC risk (OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.14-3.51, P = 0.016). Factors not associated with outcome were age, gender, ethnicity, baseline CD4 count and viral load, concomitant co-trimoxazole, or use of specific antiretrovirals. CONCLUSION: An overall IRC incidence of 7.3% was identified. Concomitant aciclovir doubled the risk of IRC and we therefore recommend careful monitoring when prescribing aciclovir with indinavir. A precipitating event was identified in 26% of IRC cases, many of which could have been avoided.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Lopinavir/ritonavir combined with twice-daily 400 mg indinavir: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in blood, CSF and semen.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the steady-state blood plasma (BP), CSF and seminal plasma (SP) pharmacokinetics (PK) of twice-daily indinavir 400 mg and lopinavir/ritonavir. METHODS: Ten HIV-1-positive men on lopinavir/ritonavir participated in a PK study. PK sampling was performed before and 2 weeks after adding indinavir to lopinavir/ritonavir-containing regimens. BP, CSF and SP RNA levels, CD4 counts and blood chemistry were checked at baseline and 2 weeks after indinavir. RESULTS: At baseline: lopinavir parameters (n=10) in BP were within expected levels. Median lopinavir trough concentrations (n=5) in CSF and SP were below the limit of detection (BLD) (i.e. <10 ng/mL) and 248 ng/mL (range 96-2777), respectively. After indinavir: lopinavir C(max), C(min) and AUC(0-12) increased by 9%, 46% and 20%, respectively (P<0.32, P<0.32 and P<0.20). In two of four men lopinavir concentrations in CSF were detectable at 27 and 29 ng/mL. Median SP lopinavir concentration was 655 ng/mL (20-2734). Median indinavir PK parameters were C(max) 3365 ng/mL (range 2130-5194), C(min) 293 ng/mL (14-766), T(max) 2.25 h (1-3), AUC(0-12) 22452 ng/mL.h (11243-33661), and t(1/2) 2.8 h (1.4-3.7). Median indinavir concentrations in CSF and SP were 39 ng/mL (21-86) and 592 ng/mL (96-983). Two of eight men who initially had detectable BP viral load (VL) became BLD (<50 copies/mL) after the addition of indinavir, and in 2/4 men with low-level viraemia in SP (BPVL BLD) their SPVL became BLD after addition of indinavir. CONCLUSIONS: Adding indinavir 400 mg twice daily to lopinavir/ritonavir-containing regimens did not significantly alter the median lopinavir PK parameters. However, wide interpatient variability in lopinavir concentrations was seen. In contrast plasma indinavir levels were >80 ng/mL in seven of eight plasma samples, and all CSF and semen samples collected.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Association of total bilirubin with indinavir and lopinavir plasma concentrations in HIV-infected patients receiving three different double-boosted dosing regimens.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of three different indinavir and lopinavir/ritonavir dosing regimens. METHODS: HIV-infected adults receiving lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily with food had nine plasma samples taken over a 12 h dosing interval at baseline (BL), after adding indinavir 600 mg twice daily for 10 days (R1), indinavir 800 mg twice daily for 5 days (R2) and lopinavir/ritonavir 533/133 mg plus indinavir 600 mg twice daily for 10 days (R3). Plasma samples were assayed using HPLC. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients completed the BL visit [10 male; mean (SD) age=43.9 (5.8) years] and 9, 7 and 7 completed R1, R2 and R3 visits, respectively. Two subjects discontinued treatment due to hypertriglyceridaemia. Compared with BL, the R3 lopinavir AUC (P<0.05) and Cmin (P=0.0025) were significantly higher and the R2 AUC trended higher (P=0.09). The indinavir AUC (P=0.030) and Cmax (P=0.035) were significantly higher for R2 compared with R1. There was a trend for increased total bilirubin (TB) after the addition of indinavir (P=0.09). Lopinavir and indinavir AUC, Cmax and Cmin were associated with TB during univariate analyses (P<0.01) while only lopinavir AUC (P=0.0004) and indinavir AUC (P=0.0028) were associated with TB during multivariate analysis. Only indinavir AUC was significant when both drugs were included in the model (P=0.0028). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated lopinavir and indinavir concentrations are associated with elevated TB.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Interaction of sildenafil and indinavir when co-administered to HIV-positive patients.

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of erectile dysfunction in HIV-infected men is estimated to be 33%. Sildenafil citrate (Viagra; Pfizer Ltd, Sandwich, Kent, UK) is the first oral drug for this condition. Since sildenafil and the protease inhibitors are both metabolized by, and act as inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics of the combination sildenafil plus indinavir in HIV-infected patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: Six patients at steady state in treatment with indinavir participated in the study. On the first day blood samples for indinavir assay were drawn at times 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 h after dosing. On the second study day patients received a single dose of 25 mg of sildenafil in addition to their routine morning medication. Blood samples were taken as described. Separated plasma was stored at -80 degrees C until analysis by high performance liquid chromatography. In a parallel study, the effect of indinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir and nelfinavir on the in vitro hepatic metabolism of sildenafil was assessed. RESULTS: The geometric mean area under the concentration curve for 0-8 h (AUC0-8h) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for indinavir were 19.69 microg/ml h (range, 9.19-31.99 microg/ml h) and 7.02 microg/ml (range, 2.33-16.17 microg/ml), respectively, on the first study day. In the presence of sildenafil, the mean AUC0-8h and Cmax of indinavir were 22.37 microg/ml h [range, 10.08-37.25 microg/ml h; 95% confidence interval (CI) for difference between means, -15 to 13.25) and 9.11 microg/ml (range, 3.41-22.78 microg/ml; 95% CI, -13 to 6.37), respectively. The geometric mean AUC0-8h and Cmax for sildenafil were 1631 ng/ml h (range, 643-2970 ng/ml h) and 384 ng/ml (range, 209-766 ng/ml) respectively. The AUC for sildenafil was 4.4 times higher than data from historical controls given either 50 mg or 100 mg of sildenafil and dose normalized to 25 mg. Indinavir was a potent inhibitor of sildenafil hepatic metabolism in vitro [concentration producing 50% inhibition of control enzyme activity (IC50) = 0.39 +/- 0.17 microM, mean +/- SD]. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of sildenafil 25 mg did not significantly alter the plasma indinavir levels. However, plasma sildenafil AUC was markedly increased in the presence of indinavir compared with historical controls. From the in vitro data, the mechanism of increase is indinavir inhibition of the hepatic metabolism of sildenafil. The magnitude of this interaction suggests a lower starting dose of sildenafil may be more appropriate in this clinical setting.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of indinavir in HIV-infected patient treated with a stable antiretroviral therapy.

The objectives of this study were to build a population pharmacokinetic model that describe plasma concentrations of indinavir in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with sustained virological response under a stable antiretroviral combination, and to characterize the effect of covariates and co-medications on indinavir pharmacokinetics. Data were obtained from 45 patients who received different dosages of indinavir: either indinavir alone t.i.d. (mostly 800 mg), either indinavir b.i.d. (mostly 800 mg) with a booster dose of 100 mg of ritonavir. Patients were required to have a baseline plasma HIV RNA <200 copies/mL and to have unchanged antiretroviral treatment for 6 months. Indinavir concentrations were measured at a first visit (one sample before drug administration and five after) and at a second visit 3 months later (before and 1 or 3 h after drug administration). A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination best described indinavir pharmacokinetics. For patients treated with indinavir alone, absorption rate constant was estimated to be 0.43/h, and oral clearance Cl/F was 33 L/h. For patients treated with indinavir plus ritonavir these estimates were 0.25/h and 19 L/h, respectively. Cl/F was found to increase by 1.45-fold in men and by 1.18-fold in patients also receiving zidovudine. Oral volume of distribution (V/F) was 24 L. The inter-individual and intra-individual variability were 117 and 205% for V/F, 42 and 58% for Cl/F, respectively. This population analysis in patients with sustained virological response, quantified the effect of ritonavir on the absorption rate constant and on the clearance of indinavir, showed an increase of Cl/F in men and can be used to draw reference curve for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Indinavir pharmacokinetics and parmacodynamics in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

The indinavir dosage regimen currently used for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children is not based on pharmacokinetic data obtained in the target patient population. The purpose of our study was to characterize indinavir pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in HIV-infected children. Eleven children (age range, 9.0 to 13.6 years; weight range, 21.7 to 56.0 kg) receiving indinavir (500 mg/m(2) every 8 h) in combination with lamivudine and stavudine were studied. The correlation of indinavir pharmacokinetic parameters and demographic parameters was evaluated. Also, the pharmacodynamic relationship between parameters of indinavir exposure and parameters of renal toxicity and immunologic recovery was studied. The area under the indinavir concentration-time curve (AUC) and patient body surface area (BSA) showed a significant negative correlation (r = 0.73; P = 0.012). Patients with smaller BSA had excessive indinavir AUC compared to adults. On the other hand, the median minimum drug concentration in plasma (C(min)) was lower than that reported for adults. The maximum indinavir concentration in serum was higher in patients with renal toxicity (5 out of 11 children), but the difference was not statistically significant (15.3 +/- 8.2 versus 9.8 +/- 4.4 mg/liter; P = 0.19). There was a trend toward higher immunologic efficacy in patients with greater indinavir exposure: the time-averaged AUC of the percentage of CD4(+) lymphocytes over the baseline value for patients with indinavir C(min) > 95% inhibitory concentration (IC(95)) was higher than in patients with C(min) < IC(95) (P = 0. 068). Our study suggests that a dose reduction may be appropriate for children with small BSA and that a 6-h dosage regimen may be indicated for a substantial percentage of patients. Due to the low number of patients enrolled in this study, our results should be confirmed by a larger study.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Indinavir, efavirenz, and abacavir pharmacokinetics in human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects.

Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group (AACTG) Protocol 886 examined the dispositions of indinavir, efavirenz, and abacavir in human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects who received indinavir at 1,000 mg every 8 h (q8h) and efavirenz at 600 mg q24h or indinavir at 1,200 mg and efavirenz at 300 mg q12h with or without abacavir 300 at mg q12h. Thirty-six subjects participated. The median minimum concentration in plasma (C(min)) for indinavir administered at 1,200 mg q12h was 88.1 nM (interquartile range [IR], 61.7 to 116.5 nM), whereas the median C(min) for indinavir administered at 1,000 mg q8h was 139.3 nM (IR, 68.8 to 308.7 nM) (P = 0.19). Compared to the minimum C(min) range for wild-type virus (80 to 120 ng/ml) estimated by the AACTG Adult Pharmacology Committee, the C(min) for indinavir administered at 1,200 mg q12h (54 ng/ml) is inadequate. The apparent oral clearance (CL/F) (P = 0.28), apparent volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)/F) (P = 0.25), and half-life (t(1/2)) (P = 0.80) of indinavir did not differ between regimens. The levels of efavirenz exposure were similar between regimens. For efavirenz administered at 600 mg q24h and 300 mg q12h, the median maximum concentrations in plasma (C(max)s) were 8,968 nM (IR, 5,784 to 11,768 nM) and 8,317 nM (6,587 to 10,239 nM), respectively (P = 0.66), and the C(min)s were 4,289 nM (IR, 2,462 to 5,904 nM) and 4,757 nM (IR, 3,088 to 6,644 nM), respectively (P = 0.29). Efavirenz pharmacokinetic parameters such as CL/F (P = 0.62), V(ss)/F (P = 0.33), and t(1/2) (P = 0.37) were similar regardless of the dosing regimen. The median C(max), C(min), CL/F, V(ss)/F, and t(1/2) for abacavir were 6,852 nM (IR, 5,702 to 7,532), 21.0 nM (IR, 21.0 to 87.5), 43.7 liters/h (IR, 37.9 to 55.2), 153.9 liters (IR, 79.6 to 164.4), and 2.0 h (IR, 1.8 to 2.8), respectively. In summary, when indinavir was given with efavirenz, the trough concentration of indinavir after administration of 1,200 mg q12h was inadequate. Abacavir did not influence the pharmacokinetics or exposure parameters of either indinavir or efavirenz. The levels of efavirenz exposure were similar in subjects receiving efavirenz q12h or q24h.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Effects of ritonavir on indinavir pharmacokinetics in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma.

Therapeutic control of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in peripheral compartments does not assure control in the central nervous system. Inadequate drug penetration may provide a sanctuary from which resistant virus can emerge or allow development of psychomotor abnormalities. To characterize the effect of ritonavir on indinavir disposition into cerebrospinal fluid, seven HIV-infected adults underwent intensive sampling at steady-state while receiving twice-daily indinavir (800 mg) and ritonavir (100 mg). Serial cerebrospinal fluid and plasma samples were obtained at 10 time points from each subject. Free indinavir accounted for 98.6% of drug in cerebrospinal fluid and 55.9% in plasma. Mean cerebrospinal fluid C(max), C(min), and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) values for free indinavir were 735 nM, 280 nM, and 6502 nM h(-1), respectively, and the free levels exceeded 100 nM in every sample. The cerebrospinal fluid/plasma AUC(0-12) ratio for free indinavir was 17.5% +/- 6.4%. This ratio was remarkably similar to results obtained in a previous study in which subjects received indinavir without ritonavir, indicating that ritonavir did not have a substantial direct effect on the barrier to indinavir penetration into cerebrospinal fluid. Low-dose ritonavir increases cerebrospinal fluid indinavir concentrations substantially more than 800 mg of indinavir given thrice daily without concomitant ritonavir, despite a lower total daily indinavir dose.

Adult↗