Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “HISTONES”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Stimulation of transcription factor binding and histone displacement by nucleosome assembly protein 1 and nucleoplasmin requires disruption of the histone octamer.

To investigate the mechanisms by which transcription factors invade nucleosomal DNA and replace histones at control elements, we have examined the response of the histone octamer to transcription factor binding in the presence of histone-binding proteins (i.e., nucleosome assembly factors). We found that yeast nucleosome assembly protein 1 (NAP-1) stimulated transcription factor binding and nucleosome displacement in a manner similar to that of nucleoplasmin. In addition, disruption of the histone octamer was required both for the stimulation of transcription factor binding to nucleosomal DNA and for transcription factor-induced nucleosome displacement mediated by nucleoplasmin or NAP-1. While NAP-1 and nucleoplasmin stimulated the binding of a fusion protein (GAL4-AH) to control nucleosome cores, this stimulation was lost upon covalent histone-histone cross-linking within the histone octamers. In addition, both NAP-1 and nucleoplasmin were able to mediate histone displacement upon the binding of five GAL4-AH dimers to control nucleosome cores; however, this activity was also forfeited when the histone octamers were cross-linked. These data indicate that octamer disruption is required for both stimulation of factor binding and factor-dependent histone displacement by nucleoplasmin and NAP-1. By contrast, transcription factor-induced histone transfer onto nonspecific competitor DNA did not require disruption of the histone octamer. Thus, histone displacement in this instance occurred by transfer of complete histone octamers, a mechanism distinct from that mediated by the histone-binding proteins nucleoplasmin and NAP-1.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2000

Regulated hyperacetylation of core histones during mouse spermatogenesis: involvement of histone deacetylases.

Here we report a detailed analysis of waves of histone acetylation that occurs throughout spermatogenesis in mouse. Our data showed that spermatogonia and preleptotene spermatocytes contained acetylated core histones H2A, H2B and H4, whereas no acetylated histones were observed throughout meiosis in leptotene or pachytene spermatocytes. Histones remained unacetylated in most round spermatids. Acetylated forms of H2A and H2B, H3 and H4 reappeared in step 9 to 11 elongating spermatids, and disappeared later in condensing spermatids. The spatial distribution pattern of acetylated H4 within the spermatids nuclei, analyzed in 3D by immunofluorescence combined with confocal microscopy, showed a spatial sequence of events tightly associated with chromatin condensation. In order to gain an insight into mechanisms controlling histone hyperacetylation during spermiogenesis, we treated spermatogenic cells with a histone deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A (TSA), which showed a spectacular increase of histone acetylation in round spermatids. This observation suggests that deacetylases are responsible for maintaining a deacetylated state of histones in these cells. TSA treatment could not induce histone acetylation in condensing spermatids, suggesting that acetylated core histones are replaced by transition proteins without being previously deacetylated. Moreover, our data showed a dramatic decrease in histone deacetylases in condensing spermatids. Therefore, the regulation of histone deacetylase activity/concentration appears to play a major role in controling histone hyperacetylation and probably histone replacement during spermiogenesis.

Acetylation↗
PubMed1987

Autogenous regulation of histone mRNA decay by histone proteins in a cell-free system.

We tested the hypothesis that histone mRNA turnover is accelerated in the presence of free histone proteins. In an in vitro mRNA decay system, histone mRNA was degraded four- to sixfold faster in reaction mixtures containing core histones and a cytoplasmic S130 fraction than in reaction mixtures lacking these components. The decay rate did not change significantly when histones or S130 was added separately, suggesting either that the histones were modified and thereby activated by S130 or that additional factors besides histones were required. RecA, SSB (single-stranded binding), and histone proteins all formed complexes with histone mRNA, but only histones induced accelerated histone mRNA turnover. Therefore, the effect was not the result of random RNA-protein interactions. Moreover, histone proteins did not induce increased degradation of gamma globin mRNA, c-myc mRNA, or total poly(A)- or poly(A)+ polysomal mRNAs. This autoregulatory mechanism is consistent with the observed accumulation of cytoplasmic histone proteins in cells after DNA synthesis stops, and it can account, in part, for the rapid disappearance of histone mRNA at the end of S phase.

Cell-Free System↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Inhibition of histone-mediated gene transfer in eucaryotic cells by anti-histone IgG.

In our laboratory, the gene transfer efficiency of some lipofection reagents (lipofectine, lipofectamine, DOTAP and Dosper) and histones H3 and H4 was compared to that of DEAE-Dextran (64). The histones H3 and H4 were found to have the highest transfection efficiency of all the agents tested. In the present study we have analyzed other parameters important for gene delivery by the histones H3 and H4. We transferred the HIV-1 tat gene to Jurkat cells and measured the transactivation of HIV-1-LTR by the transactivator protein, expressed in Jurkat cells. The expression of CAT as a reporter gene hybridized to LTR was a direct measure of transactivation potential. In order to investigate whether the transfection was only due to the positive ionic character of the histones H3 and H4 we tested other histones (H1 and H2A) and polylysine in our system. Under our experimental conditions, neither polylysine, nor the histones H1 and H2A were able to promote gene transfer in Jurkat cells. The inability of these reagents to promote gene transfer was not dependent on DNA condensation; in EMSA (Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay) all these reagents exhibited a strong retardation of DNA. In the presence of anti-histone-IgG the transfection potential of histones H3 and H4 was diminished in a concentration - dependent manner. To investigate whether the histone antibodies inhibited the condensation of DNA by histones we carried out gel retardation assays (EMSA) in the absence and in the presence of histone antibodies. Anti-histone-IgG had no effect on the retardation of histone-DNA complexes; on the contrary, retardation was increased. This observation has led us to postulate two models for the possible mechanism by which the histones H3 and H4 catalyze gene transfer in eucaryotic cells.

Chloramphenicol O-Acetyltransferase↗
PubMed1975

Histone methylation. Its occurrence in different cell types and relation to histone H4 metabolism in developing trout testis.

Histone methylation in developing trout testis has been observed in the diploid stem cells and primary spermatocytes, which actively synthesize DNA and histones. In spermatids, histone methylation is minimal and so probably plays no role in the replacement of histones by protamine which is characteristic of this cell type. No turnover of histone methyl groups could be detected over several hours, so that unlike acetylation or phosphorylation of histones, methylation in this tissue appears to be a stable, irreversible modification. When histone H4, labeled with [14C]methyl groups, is separated on starch gels into acetylated and phosphorylated derivatives, [14C]methyl label does not appear in positions characteristic of newly synthesized histone H4, i.e. the highly acetylated (di-, tri-, and tetra-acetylated), unphosphorylated species. [14C]Methyl label appears rather in the unphosphorylated, and unacetylated or monoacetylated species, shifting with time to the monophosphorylated form of histone H4. These data suggest a temporal sequence of events for histone H4: synthesis, then acetylation and deacetylation, followed by methylation and phosphorylation. Occurring late after histone synthesis and assembly into chromatin, histone methylation might then be necessary for histone interactions with other molecules (e.g. histone phosphokinase) prior to mitosis.

Animals↗
PubMed1979

The use of DNA-cellulose for analyzing histone-DNA interactions. Discovery of nucleosome-like histone binding to single-stranded DNA.

In this report, we introduce the use of DNA-cellulose chromatography for evaluating the strength of binding of histones to DNA under a variety of conditions. We have found that histones added directly to DNA-cellulose at physiological salt concentrations bind relatively weakly, with all histones eluting together at about 0.5 M NaCl when a salt gradient is applied. However, much tighter binding of the four nucleosomal histones to DNA-cellulose is obtained if gradual histone-DNA reconstitution conditions are used. In this case, the binding of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 to DNA-cellulose closely resembles their binding to native chromatin. The nativeness of the binding is indicated both by the distinctive sodium chloride elution profile of these histones from DNA-cellulose and by their relative resistance to trypsin digestion when DNA-bound. The binding to DNA-cellulose of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, which have had the first 20 to 30 amino acid residues removed from their NH2 termini, is indistinguishable from the binding to DNA-cellulose of the same intact histones, as judged by their salt elution profile. Thus, even though the NH2 termini contain 40 to 50% of the positively charged amino acid residues (thought to interact with the DNA backbone), a major contribution to the DNA binding comes from the remainder of the histone molecule. Finally, we have discovered that histones can form a "nucleosome-like" complex on single-stranded DNA. The same complex does not appear to form on RNA. Histones H3 and H4 play a predominant role in organizing this histone complex on single-stranded DNA, as they do on double-stranded DNA in normal nucleosomes. We suggest that, in the cell nucleus, nucleosomal structures may form transiently on single strands of DNA, as DNA and RNA polymerases traverse DNA packaged by histones.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Copper induces histone hypoacetylation through directly inhibiting histone acetyltransferase activity.

The abnormal accumulation of Cu2+ is closely correlated with the incidence of different diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease and Wilson disease. To study in vivo functions of Cu2+ will lead to a better understanding of the nature of these diseases. In the present study, effect of Cu2+ on histone acetylation was investigated in human hepatoma cells. Exposure of cells to Cu2+ resulted in a significant decrease of histone acetylation, as indicated by the decrease of the overall histone acetylation and the decrease of histone H3 and H4 acetylation. Since histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) are the enzymes controlled the state of histone acetylation in vivo, we tested their contribution to the inhibition of Cu2+ on histone acetylation. One hundred nanomolar trichostatin A, the specific inhibitor of HDAC, did not attenuate the inhibitory effect of Cu2+ on histone acetylation. Combined with that Cu2+ showed no effect on the in vitro activity of HDAC, these results led to the conclusion that it is HAT, but not HDAC that is involved in Cu2+ -induced histone hypoacetylation. This conclusion was confirmed by the facts that (1) Cu2+ significantly inhibited the in vitro activity of HAT, (2) Cu2+ -treated cells possessed a lower HAT activity than control cells, and (3) 50 or 100 microM bathocuproine disulfonate, a chelator of Cu2+, significantly attenuated the inhibition of Cu2+ on HAT activity and histone acetylation in the similar pattern. Combined with that Cu2+ showed no or obvious cytotoxicity at 100 or 200 microM in human hepatoma cells, and the previous study that Cu2+ inhibits the histone H4 acetylation of yeast cells at nontoxic or toxic levels, the data presented here suggest that inhibiting histone acetylation is probably one general in vivo function of Cu2+, where HAT is its molecular target.

Acetylation↗
PubMed2000

Archaeal histone selection of nucleosome positioning sequences and the procaryotic origin of histone-dependent genome evolution.

Archaeal histones and the eucaryal (eucaryotic) nucleosome core histones have almost identical histone folds. Here, we show that DNA molecules selectively incorporated by rHMfB (recombinant archaeal histone B from Methanothermus fervidus) into archaeal nucleosomes from a mixture of approximately 10(14) random sequence molecules contain sequence motifs shown previously to direct eucaryal nucleosome positioning. The dinucleotides GC, AA (=TT) and TA are repeated at approximately 10 bp intervals, with the GC harmonic displaced approximately 5 bp from the AA and TA harmonics [(GCN(3)AA or TA)(n)]. AT and CG were not strongly selected, indicating that TA not equalAT and GC not equalCG in terms of facilitating archaeal nucleosome assembly. The selected molecules have affinities for rHMfB ranging from approximately 9 to 18-fold higher than the level of affinity of the starting population, and direct the positioned assembly of archaeal nucleosomes. Fourier-transform analyses have revealed that AA dinucleotides are much enriched at approximately 10. 1 bp intervals, the helical repeat of DNA wrapped around a nucleosome, in the genomes of Eucarya and the histone-containing Euryarchaeota, but not in the genomes of Bacteria and Crenarchaeota, procaryotes that do not have histones. Facilitating histone packaging of genomic DNA has apparently therefore imposed constraints on genome sequence evolution, and since archaeal histones have no structure in addition to the histone fold, these constraints must result predominantly from histone fold-DNA contacts. Based on the three-domain universal phylogeny, histones and histone-dependent genome sequence evolution most likely evolved after the bacterial-archaeal divergence but before the archaeal-eucaryal divergence, and were subsequently lost in the Crenarchaeota. However, with lateral gene transfer, the first histone fold could alternatively have evolved after the archaeal-eucaryal divergence, early in either the euryarchaeal or eucaryal lineages.

Archaea↗
PubMed1995

The vertebrate linker histones H1 zero, H5, and H1M are descendants of invertebrate "orphon" histone H1 genes.

We investigated the evolutionary history of the divergent vertebrate linker histones H1 zero, H5, and H1M. We observed that the sequence of the central conserved domain of these vertebrate proteins shares characteristic features with histone H1 proteins of plants and invertebrate animals which otherwise never appear in any vertebrate histone H1 protein. A quantitative analysis of 58 linker histone sequences also reveals that these proteins are more similar to invertebrate and plant histone H1 than to histone H1 of vertebrates. A phylogenetic tree deduced from an alignment of the central domain of all known linker histones places H1 zero, H5, and H1M in close vicinity to invertebrate sperm histone H1 proteins and to invertebrate histone H1 proteins encoded by polyadenylated mRNAs. We therefore conclude that the ancestors of the vertebrate linker histones H1 zero, H5, and H1M diverged from the main group of histone H1 proteins before the vertebrate type of histone H1 was established in evolution. We discuss this observation in the general context of linker histone evolution.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1991

Immunogenicity of free histones and of histones complexed with RNA.

Histone antibodies have been obtained by immunizing rabbits with histones H1, H2A, H2B, H3, H4 and triacetylated H4, uncomplexed to RNA. The reactivity of these antibodies was investigated by ELISA using as antigen isolated histones and chromatin as well as thirty-five different synthetic peptides covering the entire sequence of the four core histones, two peptides of H1 and two acetylated peptides of H4. The binding of these antibodies to histones was also measured in immunoblotting and in microcomplement fixation (MCF) tests. In parallel experiments using the same assays the various antigens were tested with antisera raised against histones complexed with RNA. Antibodies induced in the absence of RNA did not react with histones in MCF tests nor with chromatin in ELISA but reacted with the histones in ELISA, although the antibody titers were somewhat lower than in the case of antisera to histone-RNA complexes. Antibodies to RNA-histone complexes reacted with histones in both ELISA and MCF tests. When they were tested with peptide-coated microtiter plates in a direct binding ELISA format, antibodies induced with uncomplexed histones recognized very few fragments which were mainly located in the N- and C-terminal ends of the histones.

Acetylation↗
PubMed1976

Effect of histones and nonhistone chromosomal proteins on the transcription of histone genes from HeLaS3 cell DNA.

To elucidate the manner in which histones and nonhistone chromosomal proteins interact to render histone genes transcribable in HeLa S3 cells, we have examined transcription of histone mRNA sequences from DNA, as well as from several DNA-chromosomal protein complexes. Histone mRNA sequences were assayed by hybridization to a 3H-labeled single-stranded DNA complementary to histone mRNAs. Our results indicate that DNA is an effective template for transcription of histone mRNA sequences and that histones by themselves inhibit transcription from DNA, including transcription of histone genes, in a dose-dependent, nonspecific manner. When complexed with DNA alone, nonhistone chromosomal proteins do not affect the transcription of histone mRNA sequences. However, when associated with DNA in the presence of histones, nonhistone chromosomal proteins are capable of selectively rendering histone genes transcribable. These results suggest a possible role for nonhistone chromosomal proteins in mediating the interactions of histones with DNA to render histone genes transcribable.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1974

Non-histone chromosomal proteins. Evidence for their role in mediating the binding of histones to deoxyribonucleic acid during the cell cycle.

By selective dissociation of histones with the ionic detergent sodium deoxycholate, we have demonstrated that these basic chromosomal polypeptides, which are effective inhibitors of transcription, are more tenaciously bound to DNA in mitotic than in S-phase chromatin. Evidence is presented which suggests that cell-cycle-stage-specific non-histone chromosomal proteins can account for such variations in the association of histones with DNA. When chromatin is reconstituted with DNA and histones are pooled from S-phase and mitotic cells and either S-phase or mitotic non-histone chromosomal proteins, a preferential extraction of histones with sodium deoxycholate from chromatin reconstituted with S-phase rather than mitotic non-histone chromosomal proteins is observed. In contrast, the extractability of histones with sodium deoxycholate from nucleohistone complexes reconstituted with DNA pooled from S-phase and mitotic cells and either S-phase or mitotic histones is identical. Since non-histone chromosomal proteins rather than histones are responsible for the differences in chromatin template activity during S-phase and mitosis, we propose that non-histone chromosomal proteins may modify gene expression during the cell cycle by mediating the binding of histones to DNA.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed1981

Histone-dependent and histone-independent forms of an ADP-ribosyltransferase from human and turkey erythrocytes.

An ADP-ribosyltransferase from turkey erythrocytes, which catalyzes the mono(ADP-ribosylation) of guanidino compounds such as arginine and of many purified and crude cellular proteins, appears to exist both in high-activity, histone-independent and low-activity, histone-dependent forms. At low salt concentrations, the activity of the transferase with agmatine as acceptor was less than 10% that observed in the presence of 200 mM NaCl. In the absence of salts, ADP-ribosylation of agmatine was stimulated greater than 10-fold by histones, and activity approached that observed with high salt concentration; under these conditions, the histones did not serve as ADP-ribose acceptors themselves. Histone also activated the highly purified ADP-ribosyltransferase from human erythrocytes. Enzyme activity was increased in the presence of salt and was then relatively independent of histones. DNA was not required for the stimulation of ADP-ribosylation by histone; incubation of the transferase and histone with DNase did not significantly decrease enzymatic activity. Additional DNA in the assay decreased the effect of histone. The erythrocyte ADP-ribosyltransferase from diverse species thus appears to exist in two forms: one is dependent on histones for activity and one which, in the presence of salt, has high intrinsic activity and is independent of histone. The fact that the active forms of the transferase generated in the presence of salt or histone have similar catalytic activity suggests that these forms of transferase may be identical. It would appear that the enzymatic activity of transferase from different species may be controlled by histones.

ADP Ribose Transferases↗
PubMed2005

Integrin engagement increases histone H3 acetylation and reduces histone H1 association with DNA in murine lung endothelial cells.

Engagement of integrin cell adhesion receptors in mouse lung endothelial cells induces global sensitivity of DNA to nuclease digestion, reflecting alterations in chromatin structure. These structural changes may contribute to the antigenotoxic effects of integrin engagement in lung endothelium. Because histone acetylation and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation modulate chromatin structure, we investigated the effects of beta1 integrin engagement with antibody on these post-translational modifications and the presence of histones at discrete DNA sequences in the mouse lung endothelial cell genome using chromatin immunoprecipitation. Integrin engagement increased acetylation of core histone H3. The presence of acetylated histone H3 at intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) promoters, and a nonpromoter sequence was also increased. As with integrin engagement, the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A caused global hypersensitivity of DNA to nuclease digestion and induced acetylation of histone H3 and its coimmunoprecipitation with VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 promoters and nonpromoter DNA. In contrast to acetyl-histone H3, the association of linker histone H1 with specific DNA sequences was either reduced or unaffected by integrin engagement and trichostatin A. Although integrin engagement and trichostatin A treatment did not affect histone H1 poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, deletion of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 increased core histone H3 acetylation and increased its level at the iNOS promoter while decreasing the amount of histone H1. The results suggest that integrin engagement, as well as trichostatin A and PARP-1 deletion, regulate chromatin structure via core histone H3 acetylation and reduced linker histone H1-DNA association.

Acetylation↗
PubMed1975

The histones of rainbow trout erythrocytes include an erythrocyte-specific histone.

The erythrocyte histones of rainbow trout were compared with those of goose by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. A band analogous to goose erythrocyte-specific histone V, but not identical in relative mobility or quantity, was found to be a component of trout erythrocyte histone. A similar component was also found in carp erythrocyte histone, but it was absent from trout liver histone. To reveal this band clearly, it was advantageous to displace the histone III monomer by oxidation. To verify the character of this protein, each of the main erythrocyte histones of trout were purified by chromatography on Amberlite CG-50, eluted with guanidinium chloride, and then further purified by exclusion chromatography on Bio-Gel P-60. Amino acid compositions of corresponding trout and goose histones, including that of the erythrocyte-specific histone, were sufficiently similar to establish their analogous identities. In general, the chromatographic and electrophoretic properties of histones I, IIb1, IIb2, and V from trout differed more from those of goose, than did their gross amino acid compositions. Comprehensive fractionation and characterization is necessary to extablish identities of corresponding histone fractions, An extensive quantitative variability was found among erythrocyte-specific histones of fish. This must be reconciled with hypothetical roles for this histone in erythropoiesis.

Amino Acids↗
PubMed2000

p300-mediated acetylation facilitates the transfer of histone H2A-H2B dimers from nucleosomes to a histone chaperone.

We have used a purified recombinant chromatin assembly system, including ACF (Acf-1 + ISWI) and NAP-1, to examine the role of histone acetylation in ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. The binding of a transcriptional activator (Gal4-VP16) to chromatin assembled using this recombinant assembly system dramatically enhances the acetylation of nucleosomal core histones by the histone acetyltransferase p300. This effect requires both the presence of Gal4-binding sites in the template and the VP16-activation domain. Order-of-addition experiments indicate that prior activator-meditated, ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling by ACF is required for the acetylation of nucleosomal histones by p300. Thus, chromatin remodeling, which requires a transcriptional activator, ACF and ATP, is an early step in the transcriptional process that regulates subsequent core histone acetylation. Glycerol gradient sedimentation and immunoprecipitation assays demonstrate that the acetylation of histones by p300 facilitates the transfer of H2A-H2B from nucleosomes to NAP-1. The results from these biochemical experiments suggest that (1) transcriptional activators (e.g., Gal4-VP16) and chromatin remodeling complexes (e.g., ACF) induce chromatin remodeling in the absence of histone acetylation; (2) transcriptional activators recruit histone acetyltransferases (e.g., p300) to promoters after chromatin remodeling has occurred; and (3) histone acetylation is important for a step subsequent to chromatin remodeling and results in the transfer of histone H2A-H2B dimers from nucleosomes to a histone chaperone such as NAP-1. Our results indicate a precise role for histone acetylation, namely to alter the structure of nucleosomes (e.g., facilitate the loss of H2A-H2B dimers) that have been remodeled previously by the action of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes. Thus, transcription from chromatin templates is ordered and sequential, with precise timing and roles for ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling, subsequent histone acetylation, and alterations in nucleosome structure.

Acetylation↗
PubMed1977

Non-histone chromosomal proteins: their role in the regulation of histone-gene expression.

Histone-gene expression was studied during the cell cycle of continuously dividing HeLa S3 cells and after stimulation of confluent monolayers of WI-38 human diploid fibroblasts to proliferate. The presence of histone-mRNA sequences was assayed by hybridization to a 3H-labelled single-stranded DNA complementary to histone-mRNA molecules. In HeLa S3 cells histone mRNA sequences were found in the nucleus and associated with polyribosomes during S-phase, but not during G1-phase. Transcripts of S-phase chromatin contained histone-mRNA sequences, but those of G1-phase chromatin did not. Similarly, in WI-38 cells association of histone-mRNA sequences with polyribosomes and transcription of histone-mRNA sequences from chromatin parallel DNA replication. Taken together these results suggest that the regulation of histone-gene expression resides, at least in part, at the transcriptional level. Chromatin-reconstitution studies provide evidence that non-histone chromosomal proteins play a key role in activation of histone-gene transcription during the period of the cell cycle when DNA is replicated. Phosphate groups associated with the S-phase non-histone chromosomal proteins appear to be functionally involved in the control of histone-gene readout.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Mytilus edulis core histone genes are organized in two clusters devoid of linker histone genes.

Comparison of histone gene cluster arrangements in several species has revealed a broad spectrum of histone gene patterns. To elucidate the core histone gene organization in a mollusk, we have analyzed a Mytilus edulis genomic library and have isolated eight phage clones containing core histone genes. Analysis of insert DNA revealed that the core histone genes are arranged as regular gene repeats of all four core histones. The repeats do not contain linker histone genes. The clones are distributed into two groups of dissimilar repeated units with a common size of about 5.6 kb. The genes of each core histone class in the distinct repeats encode identical histone proteins and have comparable gene arrangements in the two repeat units. However, the intergenic sequences differ significantly. The core histone genes are organized as large clusters of about 100 repeats each. Previously, we have shown that the linker histone genes in M. edulis are also organized in a cluster of repeats of solitary H1 genes. Hence, this is the first case of a separate, clustered organization of both core and linker histone genes, respectively.

Amino Acid Sequence↗