SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “GWASs”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

39 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed2023

Common Genetic Factors and Pathways in Alzheimer's Disease and Ischemic Stroke: Evidences from GWAS.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and ischemic stroke (IS) are common neurological disorders, and the comorbidity of these two brain diseases is often seen. Although AD and IS were regarded as two distinct disease entities, in terms of different etiologies and clinical presentation, recent genome-wide association studies (GWASs) revealed that there were common risk genes between AD and IS, indicating common molecular pathways and their common pathophysiology. In this review, we summarize AD and IS risk single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and their representative genes from the GWAS Catalog database, and find thirteen common risk genes, but no common risk SNPs. Furthermore, the common molecular pathways associated with these risk gene products are summarized from the GeneCards database and clustered into inflammation and immunity, G protein-coupled receptor, and signal transduction. At least seven of these thirteen genes can be regulated by 23 microRNAs identified from the TargetScan database. Taken together, the imbalance of these molecular pathways may give rise to these two common brain disorders. This review sheds light on the pathogenesis of comorbidity of AD and IS, and provides molecular targets for disease prevention, manipulation, and brain health maintenance.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

GWAS Meta-analysis Identifies Novel Associated Loci and Points to Causal Tissues in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To define CSC genetic architecture and identify implicated ocular tissues, cell types, genes, and circulating proteins. DATA SOURCES: Genome-wide data were assembled from FinnGen, All of Us, Mass General Brigham Biobank, Million Veteran Program, and a Dutch chronic CSC cohort. Serum protein quantitative trait loci, human single-cell ocular atlases, and UK Biobank macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging were used for downstream analyses. STUDY SELECTION: Five European-ancestry cohorts with genome-wide data and cohort-specific CSC case-control definitions were included, comprising 2,584 cases and 1,044,455 controls. Variants present in at least 2 cohorts were meta-analyzed. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Cohort-level GWASs were adjusted for age, age squared, sex, genotyping array or batch, and 10 genetic principal components, then combined using fixed-effects inverse-variance meta-analysis. Post-GWAS analyses included gene prioritization, colocalization, Mendelian randomization, single-cell disease-relevance scoring, and testing of a CSC genetic risk score in UK Biobank OCT images. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Genome-wide significant CSC loci, effector genes and proteins, tissue and cell-type enrichment, and CSC-relevant OCT abnormalities. RESULTS: Across 11,068,938 variants, 10 loci reached genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10-8), including 3 novel loci near TGFB1, LINC00551, and LOC105375630 and 7 replicated loci near CFH, CD46, NOTCH4, PREX1, PTPRB, GATA5, and TNFRSF10A. Integrative analyses prioritized 10 candidate effector genes. Colocalization and Mendelian randomization implicated circulating TNFRSF10A, TGFB1, and CASP10 levels. Single-cell analyses localized genetic risk to sclera (P = 2.0 × 10-4) and vascular endothelial cells (P = 4.0 × 10-4), with fibroblast enrichment. In UK Biobank, OCT abnormalities were more frequent in the top vs bottom 1% of CSC genetic risk (18 of 109 [16.5%] vs 8 of 134 [6.0%]; odds ratio, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.65-10.87; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this GWAS meta-analysis, CSC susceptibility localized predominantly to scleral and vascular biology rather than primary retinal pigment epithelial dysfunction. These findings support CSC as a sclerovascular disorder and nominate complement regulation, endothelial signaling, and extracellular matrix pathways for future study.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Reassessing Instrument Strength in Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Analysis.

Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis is widely used to estimate causal relationships between risk factors and outcomes of interest. Two-sample MR approaches have gained increasing attention in genetic epidemiology due to the growing availability of Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) summary statistics from public databases. A critical step in two-sample MR is the selection of genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs). Although genome-wide significant variants are typically preferred, the inclusion of variants with weaker association p-values is considered, as they may potentially improve power through an increased instrument number of instruments, while they may introduce weak instrument bias and attenuate effect estimates towards the null. Our simulation results show that even modest levels of pleiotropy substantially increase the variability of causal effect estimates, while the inclusion of weak IVs does not substantially affect the direction and variability of causal effect estimates in most cases. In real data analyses, we used two released versions of FinnGen GWAS summary statistics with different sample sizes as exposure GWASs to assess the influence of weak IVs. Here, the inclusion of IVs with higher exposure-association p-values resulted in weakened estimated effect sizes, particularly when the exposure GWAS sample size was small. These findings suggest that incorporating weak IVs is reasonable when the exposure GWAS sample size is large, but it poses a risk of falsely concluding null associations when the exposure GWAS sample size is small.

Journal Article↗