Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Fluvoxamine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

The effect of erythromycin and fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous lidocaine.

Inhibitors of CYP3A4 (cytochrome P450 3A4) have a minor effect on lidocaine pharmacokinetics. We studied the effect of coadministration of the antidepressant fluvoxamine (CYP1A2 inhibitor) and antimicrobial drug erythromycin (CYP3A4 inhibitor) on lidocaine pharmacokinetics in a double-blind, randomized, three-way crossover study. Nine volunteers ingested daily 100 mg fluvoxamine and placebo, 100 mg fluvoxamine and 1500 mg erythromycin, or their corresponding placebos for 5 days. On day 6, 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine was administered IV over 60 min. Concentrations of lidocaine and its major metabolite monoethylglycinexylidide were measured for 10 h. Fluvoxamine alone decreased the clearance of lidocaine by 41% (P < 0.001) and prolonged its elimination half-life from 2.6 to 3.5 h (P < 0.01). During the combination of fluvoxamine and erythromycin, lidocaine clearance was 53% smaller than during placebo (P < 0.001) and 21% smaller than during fluvoxamine alone (P < 0.05). During the combination phase the half-life of lidocaine (4.3 h) was longer than during the placebo (2.6 h; P < 0.001) or fluvoxamine (3.5 h; P < 0.01). We conclude that inhibition of CYP1A2 by fluvoxamine considerably reduces elimination of lidocaine and may increase the risk of lidocaine toxicity. Concomitant use of both fluvoxamine and a CYP3A4 inhibitor such as erythromycin can further increase plasma lidocaine concentrations by decreasing its clearance.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Clinical pharmacokinetics of fluvoxamine.

Fluvoxamine is a selective inhibitor of serotonin reuptake that is widely used in the management of depression. Following oral administration, the drug is absorbed efficiently from the gastrointestinal tract. Peak plasma concentrations are usually observed within 2 to 8 hours postdose for capsules and film-coated tablets and within 4 to 12 hours for enteric-coated tablets. Despite complete absorption, oral bioavailability may be incomplete probably because of first-pass metabolism. Approximately 77% of fluvoxamine is plasma protein bound. Only negligible amounts of fluvoxamine are excreted unchanged in urine. The drug is extensively biotransformed, mostly by oxidation, and at least 11 different metabolites have been detected in human urine. None of the metabolites is known to possess significant pharmacological activity. Following administration of single doses, fluvoxamine shows a biphasic elimination with a mean terminal elimination half-life of about 15 to 20 hours. Steady-state plasma fluvoxamine concentrations are achieved 5 to 10 days after initiation of therapy and are 30 to 50% higher than those predicted from single-dose data. Preliminary data also suggest that plasma drug concentrations may increase nonlinearly with increasing daily dosage. The relationship between plasma fluvoxamine concentration and clinical response has not been clearly defined. Fluvoxamine pharmacokinetics are substantially unaltered in the elderly, whereas higher plasma drug concentrations (relative to dose) are observed in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver. Fluvoxamine inhibits oxidative drug metabolising enzymes and, therefore, causes a number of clinically significant drug interactions. Drugs whose metabolic elimination is impaired by fluvoxamine include tricyclic antidepressants, alprazolam, bromazepam, diazepam, theophylline, phenazone (antipyrine), propranolol, warfarin, methadone and carbamazepine.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Fluvoxamine. An updated review of its pharmacology, and therapeutic use in depressive illness.

Fluvoxamine facilitates serotoninergic neurotransmission via potent and selective inhibition of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake into presynaptic neurones. The overall antidepressant efficacy of fluvoxamine 100 to 300 mg/day for 4 to 6 weeks in once daily or divided dosage regimens appears to be at least comparable to that of imipramine and similar to that of clomipramine, dothiepin, desipramine, amitriptyline, lofepramine, maprotiline, mianserin and moclobemide. The efficacy of fluvoxamine has been maintained for up to 1 year, but long term data are limited, and there are no comparative studies of fluvoxamine with other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. In some studies, fluvoxamine appeared to have an earlier beneficial effect on suicidal ideation and/or anxiety or somatic complaints compared with imipramine, dothiepin and maprotiline. Gastrointestinal adverse effects, especially nausea, are commonly reported with fluvoxamine but are generally mild to moderate in severity. The tolerability profile of fluvoxamine appears to be more favourable than that of tricyclic antidepressants in terms of cardiotoxic and anticholinergic adverse effects, sedation, weight gain and death from overdosage. Thus, fluvoxamine is an effective and well tolerated antidepressant agent that is becoming established as an alternative to older agents in patients with mild, moderate or severe depression. Fluvoxamine may be particularly beneficial in potentially suicidal patients with severe depression, in those with an underlying compulsive personality or cardiovascular disorder, in patients with coexistent anxiety or agitation, and in the elderly.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Fluvoxamine reduces the clozapine dosage needed in refractory schizophrenic patients.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant fluvoxamine use can potentially reduce the dosage of clozapine needed in treatment-refractory patients with schizophrenia. Previous reports have shown that fluvoxamine can increase plasma clozapine concentrations by inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of fluvoxamine, 50 mg/day, coadministration with clozapine, 100 mg/day, in refractory schizophrenic patients. METHOD: In this prospective study, 18 treatment-refractory patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia (10 nonsmokers and 8 smokers) were treated with clozapine at a target dose of 100 mg h.s. After steady-state conditions of clozapine had been reached, 50 mg/day of fluvoxamine was then added. Plasma levels of clozapine, norclozapine, and clozapine N-oxide were measured prior to fluvoxamine addition and on days 14 and 28 during combined treatment. Side effects and efficacy were monitored with standardized rating instruments. RESULTS: After 14 days of combined treatment, the mean +/- SD plasma clozapine level increased 2.3-fold to 432.4+/-190.9 ng/mL without further elevation on day 28. All patients completed the study without significant adverse side effects. Twelve of the 18 patients achieved plasma clozapine concentrations of at least 350 ng/mL. While plasma norclozapine levels also rose (but to a smaller extent), plasma clozapine N-oxide levels remained unchanged after the add-on therapy. Patients who smoked had 34% lower plasma clozapine concentrations than nonsmokers (NS). Three of the 4 patients who did not reach clozapine plasma levels of at least 300 ng/mL were smokers. Plasma norclozapine/clozapine ratios, especially in smokers, declined significantly with fluvoxamine addition. CONCLUSION: The addition of fluvoxamine, 50 mg/day, to low-dose clozapine, 100 mg/day, can raise plasma clozapine levels to at least 300 ng/mL in most patients. Only slight dosage adjustments with clozapine may be needed after fluvoxamine coadministration in some patients who smoke. Plasma clozapine levels remained stable after 14 days of fluvoxamine addition. The combined treatment was well tolerated, and clinical improvement was observed in our patients. Further long-term studies with this drug combination are needed to determine its economic impact.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Acute cardiac effects of fluvoxamine and other antidepressants in conscious rabbits.

The effects of continuous infusion of amitriptyline (0.35 mg/kg/min), mianserin (0.70 mg/kg/min) or fluvoxamine (0.70 mg/kg/min) were studied on electrocardiogram (ECG), heart contractility and temperature in conscious rabbits. Lethal doses for amitriptyline (median 13.6 mg/kg) were much lower than for mianserin (median 56.0 mg/kg) or fluvoxamine (median 59.5 mg/kg). Amitriptyline induced severe arrhythmias and ECG disturbances at relatively low doses. Mianserin induced arrhythmias and ECG disturbances at higher doses, while arrhythmias were infrequently seen with fluvoxamine. ECG disturbances were observed at fluvoxamine doses approaching lethality. Amitriptyline very much lowered contractility as assessed by LVdP/dt. With fluvoxamine a decrease in LVdP/dt was only observed at moderate doses while at nearly lethal doses neither fluvoxamine nor mianserin induced a decrease in LVdP/dt. Fluvoxamine raised body temperature significantly. Fluvoxamine seems, at least in this animal model, a drug which induces far fewer cardiac disturbances than amitriptyline and even fewer than mianserin. It is concluded that fluvoxamine is relatively free from cardiotoxicity.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Fluvoxamine versus clomipramine in the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group comparison.

BACKGROUND: To examine the efficacy of fluvoxamine and clomipramine in obsessive compulsive disorder and to compare their tolerabilities. METHOD: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, fluvoxamine (100-250 mg/day) was compared with clomipramine (100-250 mg/day) for 10 weeks in the treatment of 66 psychiatric outpatients, aged 18 to 65 years, with a diagnosis of obsessive compulsive disorder. The main efficacy variable was the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale; secondary variables were the National Institute of Mental Health Global Obsessive Compulsive Scale and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale. RESULTS: Seventeen patients withdrew prematurely, 6 in the fluvoxamine group and 11 in the clomipramine group. In the intent-to-treat population (34 fluvoxamine patients and 30 clomipramine patients), there were no significant differences with respect to the mean reduction in total Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale score (last observation carried forward) at any time-point; a mean reduction of 8.6 (33%) was seen in the fluvoxamine group and 7.8 (31%) in the clomipramine group. Similar results were obtained in virtually all secondary variables. The only exception was the obsession-free interval for the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, which was significantly longer in the fluvoxamine group, especially in a population of patients with disease of > 12 months' duration (F = 5.298, df = 1, p = .026). Adverse events were mostly tolerable; 9 patients (5 receiving fluvoxamine, 4 receiving clomipramine) withdrew due to adverse events related to treatment. CONCLUSION: Fluvoxamine and clomipramine were equally effective in the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder. Both agents were well tolerated; fluvoxamine produced fewer anticholinergic side effects and caused less sexual dysfunction than clomipramine, but more reports of headache and insomnia.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of fluvoxamine, imipramine, and placebo in the treatment of outpatients with panic disorder.

Fluvoxamine and imipramine were compared to placebo in an 8-week doubleblind randomized multicentre trial comprising of 148 outpatients between 19 and 57 years of age (mean: 35) with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of Panic Disorder. mean daily dose at endpoint was: fluvoxamine, 171.4 mg; imipramine 164.7 mg. The mean number of panic attacks per week at baseline were 10.9, 14.4 and 6.5 for fluvoxamine, imipramine and placebo, respectively. The intent-to-treat analysis of the change from baseline (difference score) of the number of panic attacks at endpoint revealed: a difference of 3.3 attacks (95% CI: -0.3, 6.8) between fluvoxamine and placebo and a difference of 6.0 attacks (95% CI: 1.5, 10.5) between imipramine and placebo. Treatment was stopped prematurely in 31 (62%) on fluvoxamine, 16 (33%) on imipramine and 29 (58%) on placebo. The number of patients withdrawing due to intolerance was 13 (26%) for fluvoxamine, 10 (21%) for imipramine and 4 (8%) for placebo. The number of patients withdrawing due to lack of efficacy was 10 (20%) for fluvoxamine, 4 (8%) for imipramine and 12 (24%) for placebo. Overall, this study demonstrated that fluvoxamine was not effective in the treatment of panic disorder but did show a strong effect for imipramine. A chance occurrence of significantly fewer number of panic attacks in the placebo group at baseline may limit the conclusions of this study.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Fluvoxamine as effective as clomipramine against symptoms of severe depression: results from a multicentre, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Although selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are better tolerated than tricyclic antidepressants, their efficacy in severe depression remains to be further elucidated. METHOD: A double-blind, multicentre study was conducted in 86 severely depressed inpatients (>or= 25 on the 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale [HAMD] total score) to compare the efficacy and safety of fluvoxamine with that of clomipramine. Following placebo run-in, 86 patients were randomised to receive fluvoxamine or clomipramine (100-250 mg/day) for 8 weeks. RESULTS: Fluvoxamine and clomipramine both resulted in marked improvements; there were no statistically significant differences between them on the 17-item HAMD total score, the clinical global impression severity of illness or global improvement items or the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale, at any visit. At the end of the study, 71% in the fluvoxamine group and 69% in the clomipramine group were responders (>or= 50% decrease in 17-item HAMD total score). However, fluvoxamine was better tolerated than clomipramine. Clomipramine was associated with a higher incidence of overall and treatment-related adverse events. In addition, the percentage of patients discontinued prematurely due to adverse events was more than twice as high with clomipramine than with fluvoxamine (24% vs 11%). CONCLUSION: Fluvoxamine and clomipramine are equally effective in severe depression, but fluvoxamine has a better safety and tolerability profile.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of the combined administration of alprazolam and fluvoxamine.

We have assessed the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between fluvoxamine, a serotonin reuptake inhibitor, and alprazolam, a triazolobenzo-diazepine. Healthy men took fluvoxamine maleate daily for 10 days (50 mg on days 1-3, 100 mg on days 4-10) (n = 20), 1 mg of alprazolam four times daily for four days (days 7-10 of the study period) (n = 20), or a combination of the two (n = 20), according to a parallel study design. Alprazolam and fluvoxamine concentrations were measured in serial plasma samples by HPLC and gas chromatography respectively, and psychomotor performance and memory were assessed on days 1, 7, and 10. Fluvoxamine increased plasma alprazolam concentrations by 100%. The mean apparent half-life of alprazolam was increased from 20 h to 34 h after fluvoxamine co-administration. The increased plasma concentrations of alprazolam resulted in significantly greater reductions in psychomotor performance evident on day 10. Mean fluvoxamine plasma concentrations were about 25% lower in those who took the combination than in those who took only fluvoxamine; this was more likely due to heterogeneity between the treatment groups than to an effect of alprazolam. The dosage of alprazolam should be reduced during co-administration with fluvoxamine.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide compared with fluvoxamine in depressive disorder (DSM III). A French/Swiss double-blind trial.

The efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide and fluvoxamine, two new types of antidepressant agents, were compared in a multicentre, double-blind prospective study of patients with a diagnosis of major depressive episode (DSM III). Patients were randomized to receive either moclobemide (150 mg) or fluvoxamine (50 mg) twice daily for 7 days, immediately following a washout period of at least 1 week. Dosages were increased where necessary on day 8, to a maximum of moclobemide 450 mg or fluvoxamine 200 mg and in most cases were maintained at these levels for the remainder of the study period (4-6 weeks). Both treatment groups showed a marked antidepressant effect. While both treatments were well tolerated, moclobemide showed a more favourable side-effect profile than fluvoxamine. Of the 126 patients eligible for evaluation, 34 withdrew from therapy, 22% in the moclobemide group and 30% in the fluvoxamine group. Adverse events were reported in 41.8% of patients treated with moclobemide compared to 60.3% of patients in the fluvoxamine group. Reports of dry mouth and other anticholinergic effects were more frequent among those treated with fluvoxamine. A greater number of gastrointestinal complaints, especially nausea, also occurred in the fluvoxamine-treated patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

The selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors fluvoxamine and paroxetine differ in sexual inhibitory effects after chronic treatment.

RATIONALE: The selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) delay orgasm and ejaculation in men. In men with rapid ejaculation it was shown that, of the SSRIs, paroxetine exerted the strongest delay in ejaculation and fluvoxamine the weakest. OBJECTIVES: In the present study, we compared the acute and chronic effects of fluvoxamine and paroxetine on sexual behavior in the male rat in order to compare their differential inhibitory effects on sexual behavior. METHODS: During a 4-week period, 48 male Wistar rats, selected on the basis of their sexual performance, were repeatedly tested for sexual behavior. All male rats received vehicle (saline, n=12), fluvoxamine (30 mg/kg, n=12), or paroxetine (10 mg/kg, n=12) daily for 2 weeks. Sexual behavioral tests were performed on days 1 (acute), 7, and 14. RESULTS: After acute oral administration, fluvoxamine and paroxetine did not inhibit sexual behavior. After 7 days and 14 days treatment, fluvoxamine mildly inhibited certain parameters of sexual behavior but ejaculation was never delayed. In contrast, paroxetine, after 7 days and particularly after 14 days treatment, strongly inhibited sexual behavior, including ejaculation. CONCLUSIONS: These results strongly concur with clinical data, suggesting that paroxetine, but not fluvoxamine, delays ejaculation. Because fluvoxamine does not delay ejaculation it may serve as an optimal treatment for depressive illness when sexual side effects, such as a delayed ejaculation, are undesired. The mechanisms whereby paroxetine and fluvoxamine, both being selective serotonin uptake inhibitors, differentially inhibit sexual behavior are unclear.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Effect of cigarette smoking on fluvoxamine pharmacokinetics in humans.

OBJECTIVES: Although fluvoxamine inhibits the biotransformation of drugs known to be metabolized by CYP1A2, there are no data available with regard to the importance of CYP1A2 for the metabolism of fluvoxamine itself. Because smoking induces the metabolism of drugs catalyzed by CYP1A2, this study investigated the pharmacokinetics of fluvoxamine in smokers and nonsmokers. METHODS: The serum concentration of fluvoxamine was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography for 48 hours after oral administration of a single dose of 50 mg fluvoxamine to 12 smokers (> or = 10 cigarettes per day) and 12 nonsmokers. RESULTS: The smokers had significantly lower areas under the serum concentration-time curve and significantly lower maximal serum concentrations than the nonsmokers (mean +/- SD, 771 +/- 346 versus 1110 +/- 511 nmol.hr.L-1 [p = 0.012] and 39.1 +/- 17.3 versus 57.7 +/- 21.5 nmol.L-1 [p = 0.012], respectively). The terminal elimination half-life did not differ significantly between smokers and nonsmokers (10.1 +/- 1.9 and 10.7 +/- 2.3 hours, respectively). The oral clearance was high among both smokers (4.1 +/- 1.9 L.min-1) and nonsmokers (3.3 +/- 2.7 L.min-1; difference not significant). CONCLUSION: Smokers had lower serum concentrations of fluvoxamine than nonsmokers after a single oral dose of fluvoxamine. This finding is consistent with a possible role of CYP1A2 in fluvoxamine metabolism.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, suppresses tetrahydrobiopterin in the mouse hippocampus.

In the present study, we investigated the effects of fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, on brain tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) levels. We directly measured levels of BH4 by Tani and Ohno's direct method as well as the serotonin (5-HT) turnover ratio, i.e. 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA)/5-HT, after sub-acute s.c. injection of fluvoxamine in the hippocampus of mice. Our animal model incorporated two risk factors of depression, social isolation and acute environmental change. Male ddY mice (6W) were housed in isolation (1 per cage; 35 days), injected with fluvoxamine (20 or 40 mg/kg; days 29-35), and exposed to novelty stress (20 min; day 35). In the stress session, behavioral parameters, i.e. total distance and rearing behavior, were measured. Isolation housing increased both behaviors. Fluvoxamine attenuated rearing behavior, but did not influence total distance. Isolation housing increased BH4 levels. Novelty stress increased BH4 levels in group housing, although it did not change them in isolation housing. Fluvoxamine suppressed BH4 levels. In isolation housing, fluvoxamine increased 5-HT turnover ratios, while it decreased them in group housing. In conclusion, fluvoxamine, housing condition, and novelty stress regulated BH4 levels. Fluvoxamine may have changed behavior and 5-HT turnover by suppressing BH4 levels as well as by inhibiting 5-HT reuptake.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Effect of fluvoxamine therapy on the activities of CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP3A as determined by phenotyping.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of 150 mg/day fluvoxamine on the activities of CYP1A2, CYP2D6, CYP3A, N-acetyltransferase-2 (NAT2), and xanthine oxidase (XO) by phenotyping with caffeine, dextromethorphan, and midazolam. METHODS: Oral caffeine (2 mg/kg), oral dextromethorphan (30 mg), and intravenous midazolam (0.025 mg/kg) were administered to 10 white male volunteers every 14 days for 4 months and to 10 white premenopausal female volunteers during the midfollicular and midluteal phases of the menstrual cycle for 4 complete cycles (8 total phenotyping measures). The first 6 phenotyping measures were used to establish baseline activity. Subjects were given 150 mg/day fluvoxamine for the fourth month or cycle of the study. Enzyme activity for CYP1A2, CYP2D6, NAT2, and XO was expressed as urinary metabolite ratios. Midazolam plasma clearance was used to express CYP3A activity. RESULTS: No difference between baseline and weeks 2 and 4 of fluvoxamine therapy was observed for NAT2 or XO metabolite ratios. For CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP3A phenotypes, significant differences existed between baseline and fluvoxamine therapy. For CYP1A2, the mean urinary metabolite ratio (+/-SD) was 7.53 +/- 7.44 at baseline and 4.30 +/- 2.82 with fluvoxamine ( P = .012). Mean CYP2D6 molar urinary dextromethorphan ratios before and after fluvoxamine therapy were 0.00780 +/- 0.00694 and 0.0153 +/- 0.0127, respectively (P = .011). Midazolam clearance decreased from 0.0081 +/ 0.0024 L/min/kg at baseline to 0.0054 +/- 0.0021 L/min/kg with therapy (P = .0091). For CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP3A, fluvoxamine therapy changed the phenotyping measures by a median of -44.4%, 123.5%, and -34.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that fluvoxamine may cause significant inhibition of CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP3A activity. This metabolic inhibition may have serious implications for a variety medications.

Acetyltransferases↗
PubMed2001

Effect of chronic administration of flesinoxan and fluvoxamine on freezing behavior induced by conditioned fear.

The present study investigated the acute effects of flesinoxan (a selective 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist), fluvoxamine (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) and their co-administration on the expression of conditioned freezing, and index of anxiety in rats. This study also examined the acute effects of fluvoxamine and flesinoxan following chronic flesinoxan or chronic fluvoxamine on the expression of conditioned freezing. Acute administration of flesinoxan (s.c.; 0.1-3 mg/kg) reduced freezing dose dependently, and fluvoxamine (i.p.) at a high dose (60 mg/kg) reduced freezing significantly. Acute co-administration of fluvoxamine (30 mg/kg) and flesinoxan (0.3 mg/kg) showed an additive inhibitory effect on freezing. Chronic flesinoxan treatment (0.3 mg/kg, for 13 days) did not affect the inhibitory effect of acute flesinoxan treatment, but enhanced that of acute fluvoxamine (30 mg/kg) on conditioned freezing. Chronic fluvoxamine treatment (30 mg/kg, for 13 days) enhanced the inhibitory effect of acute fluvoxamine (30 mg/kg) and the inhibitory effect of acute flesinoxan (0.3 mg/kg) on conditioned freezing. These results suggest that co-administration of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and a 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist is useful for the treatment of anxiety disorders.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2001

Characteristics of fluvoxamine-induced nausea.

We investigated the association between fluvoxamine and nausea from various viewpoints. The incidence of nausea induced by fluvoxamine was 29% (12/41). Plasma 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (p5-HIAA) levels after fluvoxamine administration were significantly higher in patients with nausea (6.6+/-3.4 ng/ml) than in those without nausea (3.5+/-2.7 ng/ml). On the other hand, no significant differences were found between patients with and patients without nausea in terms of sex, age, initial and maximum dosages of fluvoxamine and its plasma concentrations, and clinical response to fluvoxamine. However, the incidence of nausea in patients who were initially administered fluvoxamine at under 50 mg/day was significantly lower than in those who were started at above 50 mg/day. In addition, mosapride, a member of the benzamide family, was effective in alleviating fluvoxamine-induced nausea. These results suggest that fluvoxamine-induced nausea is associated with hyperactivity in serotonergic neurons.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A double-blind comparison of fluvoxamine versus placebo in the treatment of compulsive buying disorder.

Nondepressed outpatients with a compulsive buying disorder were recruited by advertisement and word of mouth for inclusion in a controlled treatment trial. Following a 1-week single-blind placebo washout, subjects were randomly assigned to fluvoxamine (n = 12) or placebo (n = 11). Subjects received fluvoxamine (up to 300 mg daily) or placebo for 9 weeks. There were few dropouts. Outcome measures included the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale--Shopping Version (YBOCS-SV), three Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) ratings, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), and the Maudsley Obsessive-compulsive Inventory (MOI). At the conclusion of the trial, 50% of fluvoxamine recipients and 63.6% of placebo recipients achieved CGI ratings of "much" or "very much" improvement, while 33% of fluvoxamine recipients were "very much" improved compared with 18% of placebo recipients (by endpoint analysis). Subjects in both treatment cells showed improvement as early as the second week of the trial, and for most, improvement continued during the 9-week study. There were no significant differences between fluvoxamine- and placebo-treated subjects on any of the outcome measures, with the exception that fluvoxamine recipients achieved greater improvement than placebo recipients on the MOI (p = .02). Adverse experiences were more frequent in the group receiving fluvoxamine, particularly nausea, insomnia, decreased motivation, and sedation. We conclude that in a short-term treatment trial of compulsive buying, subjects receiving fluvoxamine or placebo respond similarly.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Fluvoxamine does not interact with alcohol or potentiate alcohol-related impairment of cognitive function.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether fluvoxamine alters the pharmacokinetics of alcohol or potentiates alcohol-related impairment of cognitive function. METHODS: The study design required partially "blinded" balanced crossover studies, each involving 12 healthy male volunteers who each received a 40 gm dose of intravenous or oral alcohol after single and multiple doses of 50 mg fluvoxamine. Main outcome measures for pharmacokinetics were venous blood alcohol and plasma fluvoxamine. Main outcome measures for pharmacodynamics were word recall, simple and choice reaction time, number vigilance, memory scanning, and word recognition. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of intravenous alcohol were not affected by concomitant administration of fluvoxamine. Compared with placebo-alcohol, alcohol slightly increased the rate of fluvoxamine absorption, but the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours at steady state was unchanged. As expected, alcohol significantly impaired cognitive function in volunteers. However, fluvoxamine did not potentiate the effects of alcohol and in some instances appeared to reverse the effects or reduce their duration. Fluvoxamine was well tolerated: only mild adverse effects were reported, and none of those required intervention. CONCLUSION: Fluvoxamine does not interact significantly with alcohol or potentiate alcohol-related impairment of cognitive function.

Administration, Oral↗