Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Fenofibrate”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Effects of micronized fenofibrate and vitamin E on in vitro oxidation of lipoproteins in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to compare the antioxidant activity of micronised fenofibrate 200 mg to 400 IU of vitamin E and placebo, on the LDL and VLDL particles of patients with type 1 diabetes. The secondary objective was to investigate the possible synergy between micronized fenofibrate and vitamin E and to compare the efficacy of these treatments on lipids. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which patients were randomised into three treatment groups after a wash-out period of 8 weeks: the placebo group (Pla/Pla-group) in which patients received placebo during two consecutive periods of 8 weeks, the vitamin E group (Vit E/Vit E-group) in which patients received Vitamin E during two consecutive periods, and the fenofibrate/Vitamin E group (Fen/Fen + Vit E-group) in which patients received fenofibrate during the first period, followed by fenofibrate and vitamin E during the consecutive period. Blood samples taken at each visit, were analysed for routine biochemistry, blood lipids and copper mediated lipid peroxidation in vitro. RESULTS: The lag time of the non-HDL lipoprotein oxidation increased in the group given fenofibrate. The lag-time increased further when fenofibrate and vitamin E were given in association. (This reached significance in the intention-to-treat population, P = 0.034). The AUC of TBARS formation in the Vit E/Vit E group decreased after the first period, but this effect was not enhanced by continuing vitamin E for another 8 weeks. The AUC of TBARS formation did not change significantly after the administration of fenofibrate. Only after the second period, when vit E was given in association, the AUC of TBARS formation decreased significantly (P = 0.004). Fenofibrate caused a significant decrease in total and LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides (P < 0.05). In contrast, vitamin E had no effect on lipids. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of micronized fenofibrate 200 mg/day and vitamin E 400 IU/day tended to increase the resistance of non-HDL lipoproteins to copper-mediated oxidation, shown by a prolongation of the lag-time. Vitamin E administration only, decreased the oxidation of non-HDL lipoproteins shown by a reduction of TBARS formation. This protective effect of vitamin E tended to be amplified by micronized fenofibrate.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Regulation of lipid metabolism and gene expression by fenofibrate in hamsters.

Fenofibrate is a potent hypolipidemic agent that lowers plasma lipid levels and may thus decrease the incidence of atherosclerosis. Here we investigated the molecular mechanism of fenofibrate's hypolipidemic action by characterizing its in vivo effects on the expression of mRNAs and the activities of pivotal enzymes in cholesterol and triglyceride metabolism in the hamster. Treatment of hamsters with fenofibrate led to a dose-dependent reduction in serum cholesterol concentrations. Studies on the incorporation of [(14)C]acetate and [(14)C]mevalonate into cholesterol suggested that this effect occurs primarily through inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis at steps prior to mevalonate. Fenofibrate decreased levels of hepatic enzyme activities and mRNAs for 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) synthase and HMG CoA reductase. A potential mechanism for transcriptional regulation of these enzymes is via SREBP-2 that we found to be suppressed 2-fold by fenofibrate. Fenofibrate also lowered circulatory triglyceride levels. In keeping with the effect, we observed strong suppression of fatty acid synthase, acetyl-CoA carboxylase and apolipoprotein C-III mRNA and stimulation of lipoprotein lipase and acyl-CoA oxidase mRNA in the liver of fenofibrate-treated hamsters. These observations suggest that the effect of fenofibrate on triglyceride metabolism is likely to be a result of both decreased fatty acid synthesis and increased lipoprotein lipase and acyl-CoA oxidase gene expression in the liver. Surprisingly, alterations in lipoprotein lipase, acyl-CoA oxidase, acetyl-CoA carboxylase, and apolipoprotein C-III could not be observed in hamster hepatocytes incubated with fenofibric acid in vitro. These observations raise the possibility that changes in these genes may be secondary to the metabolic alterations occurring in animals but not in cultured cells and thus that the effect of fenofibrate on these genes may be indirect.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Fenofibrate prevents Rosiglitazone-induced body weight gain in ob/ob mice.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Fibrates and thiazolidinediones are commonly used for the treatment of dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes, respectively. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects on body weight as well as on glucose and lipid homeostasis of ligands for PPARalpha and PPARgamma, Fenofibrate and Rosiglitazone, alone or in association. METHODS: Ob/ob mice were divided into four groups: control, and mice daily injected (intraperitoneally), either with 10 mg/kg Rosiglitazone, 100 mg/kg Fenofibrate or both molecules. Body weight and food intake were monitored daily. After 13 days of treatment, mice were killed, and blood samples were collected for posterior metabolite quantification. The liver and adipose tissues were dissected and weighed. RESULTS: Body weight was significantly reduced or increased by Fenofibrate and Rosiglitazone, respectively. The effect of Rosiglitazone was prevented by coadministration of Fenofibrate. This was accompanied by a normalization of the daily food efficiency. Compared to those treated with Rosiglitazone, animals treated with Fenofibrate alone or in combination presented a decreased white adipose tissue mass. Fenofibrate or Rosiglitazone alone significantly reduced the levels of plasma lipid parameters. Surprisingly, Fenofibrate also decreased blood glucose levels in ob/ob mice, despite having no effect on insulin levels. By contrast, both glucose and insulin levels were decreased by Rosiglitazone treatment. Coadministration of both drugs improved all parameters as with Rosiglitazone. Fenofibrate restored almost normal hepatocyte morphology and significantly reduced the triglyceride content of the liver. This was accompanied by an increase in fatty acid oxidation in the liver in all groups receiving Fenofibrate. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: These biological effects suggest that combined therapy with a PPARalpha and a PPARgamma ligand is more effective in ameliorating, specifically, lipid homeostasis than in activating any of this receptor separately. Furthermore, Fenofibrate prevents one of the most undesirable effects of Rosiglitazone, namely increased adiposity and body weight gain.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Fenofibrate enhances urate reduction in men treated with allopurinol for hyperuricaemia and gout.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the short-term urate-lowering effect of fenofibrate in men on long-term allopurinol therapy for hyperuricaemia and gout. METHODS: Ten male patients (38-74 yr) with a history of chronic tophaceous or recurrent acute gout with hyperuricaemia and on established allopurinol at 300-900 mg/day for > or =3 months were studied in an open-crossover study of fenofibrate therapy. Allopurinol at the established dose was continued throughout the study. Clinical and biochemical assessments (serum urate and creatinine, 24-h urinary excretion of urate and creatinine, liver function tests, creatine kinase and fasting serum lipids) were undertaken at: (i) baseline, (ii) after 3 weeks of once-daily therapy with micronized fenofibrate (Lipantil Micro) at 200 mg and (iii) 3 weeks after fenofibrate was withdrawn. RESULTS: Fenofibrate was associated with a 19% reduction in serum urate after 3 weeks of treatment (mean+/-S.E. 0.37+/-0.04 vs 0.30+/-0.02 mM/l; P=0.004). The effect was reversed after a 3-week fenofibrate withdrawal period (0.30+/-0.02 vs 0.38+/-0.03 mM/l). There was a rise in uric acid clearance with fenofibrate treatment of 36% (7.2+/-0.9 vs 11.4+/-1.6 ml/min, normal range 6-11; P=0.006) without a significant change in creatinine clearance. Both total cholesterol and serum triglycerides were also reduced. No patient developed acute gout whilst taking fenofibrate. CONCLUSIONS: Fenofibrate has a rapid and reversible urate-lowering effect in patients with hyperuricaemia and gout on established allopurinol prophylaxis. Fenofibrate may be a potential new treatment for hyperuricaemia and the prevention of gout, particularly in patients with coexisting hyperlipidaemia or those resistant to conventional therapy for hyperuricaemia.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Fenofibrate, troglitazone, and 15-deoxy-Delta12,14-prostaglandin J2 close KATP channels and induce insulin secretion.

It is known that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) ligands stimulate acute-phase insulin secretion with a rapid Ca2+ influx into pancreatic beta-cells, but the precise mechanisms are not clear. The effects of PPAR-alpha ligands on pancreatic beta-cells also remain unclear. We investigated the effects of PPAR-alpha ligands (fenofibrate and fenofibric acid), a PPAR-gamma ligand (troglitazone), and an endogenous ligand of PPAR-gamma [15-deoxy-Delta12,14-prostaglandin J2 (15-deoxy-Delta12,14-PGJ2)] on KATP channel activity in clonal hamster insulinoma cell line, HIT-T15 cells. As assessed by whole-cell patch clamp, fenofibrate, fenofibric acid, troglitazone, and 15-deoxy-Delta12,14-PGJ2 reduced the KATP channel currents, and inhibition continued after washout of these agents. The concentration-response curves of fenofibrate, fenofibric acid, troglitazone, and 15-deoxy-Delta12,14-PGJ2 showed half-maximal inhibition of KATP channel currents (IC50) at 3.26, 94, 2.1, and 7.3 micromol/l, respectively. Fenofibrate (> or = 10(-6) mol/l), 15-deoxy-Delta12,14-PGJ2 (> or = 5 x 10(-5) mol/l), and troglitazone (> or = 10(-6) mol/l) inhibited [3H]glibenclamide binding, but fenofibric acid did not. In addition, fenofibrate (> or = 10(-6) mol/l), fenofibric acid (10(-4) mol/l), troglitazone (10(-4) mol/l), and 15-deoxy-Delta12,14-PGJ2 (> or = 10(-5) mol/l) increased insulin secretion from HIT-T15 when applied for 10 min. Our data suggest that PPAR-alpha and -gamma ligands interact directly with the beta-cell membrane and stimulate insulin secretion.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Fenofibrate increases creatininemia by increasing metabolic production of creatinine.

Fenofibrate is a potent hypolipemic agent, widely used in patients with renal insufficiency in whom dyslipidemia is frequent. A moderate reversible increase in creatinine plasma levels is an established side effect of fenofibrate therapy, which mechanism remains unknown. We have previously reported that in 13 patients with normal renal function or moderate renal insufficiency, two weeks of fenofibrate therapy increased creatininemia without any changes in renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate [1]. In 13 additional patients, muscular enzymes (AST, GPT, CPK, LDH) and myoglobin were measured before and after 2 weeks on fenofibrate, and the values of creatininemia obtained by the Jaffé technique and HPLC were compared. CPK and AST activity and plasma myoglobin increased in 2 patients with fenofibrate, but muscular enzymes remained unchanged in the population as a whole, and were not correlated to the changes in creatininemia. The changes in creatininemia induced by fenofibrate measured by the Jaffé technique were strongly correlated to those measured by HPLC (r(2) = 0.675, p = 0.0006). Analysis of the pooled data of the two arms of the study showed in 26 patients that two weeks of fenofibrate therapy efficiently reduced total cholesterol and triglycerides plasma levels, and raised creatininemia from 139 +/- 8 to 160 +/- 10 micromol/l (p < 0.0001), but confirmed that creatininuria also increased to the extent that creatinine clearance remained unchanged (68 +/- 6 vs. 67 +/- 6 ml/min, n.s.). It is concluded that the increase in creatininemia induced by fenofibrate in renal patients does not reflect an impairment of renal function, nor an alteration of tubular creatinine secretion, and is not falsely increased by a dosage interference. Fenofibrate-induced increase of daily creatinine production is neither readily explained by accelerated muscular cell lysis. It is proposed that fenofibrate increases the metabolic production rate of creatinine.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Fenofibrate potentiates warfarin effects.

OBJECTIVE: To describe 2 patients in whom the initiation of fenofibrate potentiated warfarin's anticoagulant effects. CASE SUMMARY: A 71-year-old white woman and an 80-year-old white woman with multiple medical conditions were both stabilized on long-term warfarin therapy. During the course of anticoagulation, both patients were prescribed fenofibrate and experienced threefold and twofold increases in international normalized ratio (INR), respectively, requiring total weekly warfarin dosage reductions of 30-40%. Before starting fenofibrate therapy, both patients' coagulation values were within the therapeutic range. When interviewed, patients and caregivers denied bleeding, bruising, changes in diet, alcohol ingestion, nonadherence with therapy, or changes in drug regimen except for the addition of fenofibrate. Upon chart review, evaluation of potentially contributory parameters, such as other changes in drug therapy, thyroid function, liver function, and drug-disease interactions, showed that these parameters remained stable and were ruled noncontributory. DISCUSSION: The addition of fenofibrate in 2 patients on stable and therapeutic doses of warfarin increased the anticoagulant response to warfarin. A clear temporal relationship with the addition of fenofibrate and the appearance of the interaction was seen. Fenofibrate is highly protein bound, with the potential to displace warfarin from its binding protein, leading to an enhanced hypoprothrombinemic effect. Fenofibrate is also a mild to moderate inhibitor of CYP2C9, the enzyme responsible for warfarin metabolism. The combination of these effects--displacement of warfarin by fenofibrate coupled with decreased metabolism of warfarin--may increase the anticoagulant response to warfarin. Using the Naranjo probability scale, these interactions were designated as probable. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest serial monitoring of INR and consider an empiric 20% reduction in warfarin dosage when fenofibrate is initiated, with the possibility for a greater warfarin dosage reduction based on INR results.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

[Anti-atheromatous effects of fenofibrate, a hypolipidemic drug. I: Anti-atheromatous effects are independent of its hypolipidemic effect in cholesterol-fed rabbits].

Anti-atheromatous effects of fenofibrate were studied in cholesterol-fed rabbits. Rabbits in the control group (HCD) and fenofibrate group (F-HCD) were fed the 0.5% cholesterol diet and the 0.5% cholesterol plus 0.11% fenofibrate diet (corresponding to ca. 30 mg/kg/day), respectively, for 2, 4 or 10 weeks. Fenofibrate did not change serum levels of total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglyceride during the feeding period. The percentage of plaque area (PPA) formation in the thoracic aorta was time-dependently increased. PPA values were reduced in the rabbits treated with fenofibrate for 2 and 4 weeks, but not in those treated for 10 weeks. Fenofibrate had no effect on the plaque thickness. The percentage of circulating free platelets in the HCD group was reduced at the 4th week of feeding, but that in the F-HCD group was not. The anti-platelet effect of fenofibrate might cause the anti-atheromatous effect. Fenofibric acid, an active metabolite of fenofibrate, had no inhibitory effect on LDL peroxidation in vitro. From these results, we conclude that fenofibrate manifests an anti-atheromatous effect independent of the hypolipidemic effect in cholesterol-fed rabbits and that it may inhibit an early event in the atherogenesis.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Micronised fenofibrate: a review of its pharmacodynamic properties and clinical efficacy in the management of dyslipidaemia.

Micronised fenofibrate is a new formulation of the fibric acid derivative fenofibrate. It is indicated for the treatment of patients with type IIa, IIb, III or IV dyslipidaemia who have failed to respond to dietary control or other nonpharmacological interventions. Micronised fenofibrate has improved absorption characteristics compared with the standard preparation, allowing a lower daily dosage and once-daily administration. The lipid-modifying profile of micronised fenofibrate is characterised by a decrease in low density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol levels, a marked reduction in elevated plasma triglyceride levels and an increase in high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. Consistent with the standard formulation, which is administered as 300mg daily in divided doses, the micronised preparation has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of type IIa, IIb and IV primary dyslipidaemias but at a lower daily dosage of 200mg once daily. Because of its significant triglyceride-lowering effect, micronised fenofibrate appears to be of greatest benefit in patients with hypertriglyceridaemia (with or without hypercholesterolaemia), including patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia. In the comparisons available, micronised fenofibrate 200mg once daily was of similar efficacy to or less effective than the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors simvastatin 20mg daily and pravastatin 20mg daily at reducing LDL and total cholesterol levels. However micronised fenofibrate produced greater improvements in triglyceride and, generally, HDL cholesterol levels than both simvastatin and pravastatin. Data on the long term tolerability of micronised fenofibrate are limited. However, data from a large short term (3-month) study have indicated that gastrointestinal disorders are the most frequent adverse events associated with therapy. Elevations in serum transaminase and creatine phosphokinase levels have been reported rarely with micronised fenofibrate. In conclusion, available data suggest that the more convenient lower once-daily dosage of micronisedfeno fibrate retains the beneficial lipid-modifying effects of the standard formulation. Further studies are required to determine whether the lipid changes achieved with micronised fenofibrate result in a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed2002

Micronized fenofibrate in dyslipidemia: a focus on plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels.

The prodrug fenofibrate, a synthetic phenoxy-isobutyric acid derivative, is rapidly hydrolyzed in vivo to form fenofibric acid, which alters plasma lipid levels by activating the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha. The micronized fenofibrate 200 mg capsule formulation, and the recently developed micronized fenofibrate 160 mg tablet formulation, are bioequivalent. Micronized fenofibrate 200 mg/day (capsules) increased high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels significantly from baseline in up to 7098 patients with various dyslipidemias in noncomparative studies. Micronized fenofibrate 200 mg/day (capsules) produced significantly greater elevations in HDL-C levels than a variety of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in small, randomized, double-blind and nonblind studies in patients with dyslipidemia (n = 91 to 227). This formulation of fenofibrate and gemfibrozil produced similar increases in HDL-C levels in a randomized, double-blind study (n = 234). Micronized fenofibrate 160 mg once daily (tablet) increased HDL-C levels significantly from baseline by 10.6 to 14.5% in patients with type IIa or IIb dyslipidemia (n = 353) in two noncomparative studies. Additionally, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglyceride levels, and LDL-C to HDL-C and TC to HDL-C ratios were lowered significantly from baseline. The tablet and capsule formulations of fenofibrate were both generally well tolerated in two noncomparative studies in 375 or 9884 patients. In double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in a total of 804 patients, the pooled incidences of individual adverse events were generally similar with fenofibrate and placebo.

Biological Availability↗
PubMed2006

Effect of fenofibrate in combination with urate lowering agents in patients with gout.

BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy of fenofibrate treatment in combination with urate lowering agents in patients with gout. METHODS: Fourteen male patients with chronic tophaceous or recurrent acute attacks of gout were evaluated in an open-label pilot study of the hypolipidemic agent, fenofibrate (Lipidil Supra 160 mg/d). Patients were stable on urate lowering agents (allopurinol or benzbromarone) for > or = three months without acute attack for the most recent one month before participating. All patients were being treated with established doses of urate lowering agents without modification throughout the study. Clinical and biochemical assessments including serum uric acid, creatinine, liver function test and fasting serum lipid were measured at (1) baseline (2) after two months of fenofibrate treatment and (3) two months after fenofibrate was withdrawn. RESULTS: Serum uric acid was lowered by 23% after two months of fenofibrate treatment (6.93 +/- 2.16 vs. 5.22 +/- 1.16 mg/dL; p = 0.016). Triglyceride levels were also reduced after fenofibrate treatment (p = 0.001). However, this effect was reversed after the withdrawal (p = 0.002) of the drug. Alkaline phosphatase was reduced after fenofibrate treatment (p = 0.006), but increased 21% after the withdrawal of the drug (p = 0.002). By contrast, serum levels of high density lipoprotein and creatinine were increased 9% (p = 0.018) and 12% (p = 0.006), respectively; however, both levels were significantly decreased to the baseline levels upon withdrawal of fenofibrate. CONCLUSIONS: Fenofibrate can effectively reduce uric acid levels in addition to its known hypolipidemic effect. Fenofibrate may be used as a potential urate lowering agent in patients with gout, especially in those with coexisting hyperlipidemia.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Effects of simvastatin and fenofibrate on serum lipoproteins and apolipoproteins in primary hypercholesterolaemia.

Sixteen patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia received double-blind either fenofibrate (n = 8; 200 mg bid) or the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin (n = 8; 20 mg q.p.m. [corrected] or 40 mg q.p.m. [corrected] if LDL-cholesterol did not fall below 3.6 mmol.l-1 after 4 weeks of treatment). Simvastatin reduced total cholesterol from 9.7 to 7.0 mmol.l-1 after 10 weeks (-28%), and fenofibrate reduced it from 9.2 to 7.7 mmol.l-1 (-15%). The decrease was less during fenofibrate than during simvastatin treatment (time x drug: p = 0.02). Serum LDL-cholesterol fell from 8.3 to 5.3 mmol.l-1 (-36%) during simvastatin and from 7.2 to 6.0 mmol.l-1 (-16%) during fenofibrate administration. Again, the effect of simvastatin was more pronounced than that of fenofibrate (time x drug: p = 0.03). HDL-cholesterol increased significantly from 1.1 to 1.2 mmol.l-1 (+13%) during fenofibrate administration and it did not change significantly during simvastatin. Serum triglycerides fell from 1.3 to 1.1 mmol.l-1 (-16%) during simvastatin, and even more significantly from 2.2 to 1.1 mmol.l-1 (-51%) during fenofibrate (time x drug: p = 0.002). Apolipoprotein B fell on simvastatin from 1.9 to 1.4 g.l-1 (-24%) and from 1.8 to 1.4 g.l-1 (-22%) during fenofibrate. Both drugs were well tolerated and had no significant adverse effects. Simvastatin lowered total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations more than fenofibrate, while the latter had more effect on triglycerides, suggesting specific indications for the two drugs in the treatment of hyperlipoproteinaemias.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Distribution of fenofibric acid in lipoprotein fractions of patients.

The antidyslipidemic agent fenofibrate (procetofen) is hydrolysed in vivo to its main active metabolite--fenofibric (procetofenic) acid. This metabolite is usually determined in pharmacokinetic studies, because plasma concentrations of fenofibrate are practically undetectable. Presented study is focussed on the distribution of fenofibric acid into lipoprotein (VLDL, LDL, IDL and HDL) fractions of human and (for comparison) minipig blood plasma, which has not been studied yet. In order to obtain more accurate results, a new HPLC method based on the use of newly synthetized internal standards was developed. Four homologues of fenofibric acid prepared have identical chromophoric part of their molecules and hence the same UV spectra as fenofibric acid. From this point of view, these standards are more suitable for determination of fenofibric acid than the formerly used ones--naproxen or bezafibrate. Fenofibric acid levels in the high density lipoprotein fraction has been shown to be significantly higher (in both human and minipig plasma) than in the other lipoprotein fractions. This fact may be explained by higher affinity of the fenofibric acid to proteins constituting major part of the high density lipoprotein fraction.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Effects of fenofibrate on plasma lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia.

To investigate the lipoprotein effect of fenofibrate in hypercholesterolemia or combined hyperlipidemia (types II A and II B hyperlipidemias, respectively), 240 patients were recruited and 227 randomized to a double-blind randomized trial lasting 24 weeks and 192 patients continued to participate in an open-label phase for another 24 weeks. A 100-mg dose of fenofibrate or a matching placebo was given three times daily. Fenofibrate side effects in excess of placebo affected 6 percent of fenofibrate users and were confined almost entirely to skin rashes. In 180 hypercholesterolemic patients randomly assigned to receive fenofibrate versus placebo, triglyceride and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased 38 percent, total cholesterol levels decreased 17.5 percent, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased 20.3 percent with fenofibrate treatment. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels increased 11.1 percent with a decrease in the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio of 27 percent. All differences were statistically significant (p less than 0.01). In combined hyperlipidemic (type II B) patients, triglyceride levels decreased by 45 percent, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased 52.7 percent, total cholesterol levels decreased 16 percent, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased 6 percent, and high-density lipoprotein levels increased 15.3 percent for a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio decrease of 13 percent. All differences were again statistically significant (p less than 0.01). In both groups of patients, the onset of the drug effect was generally rapid, with maximal total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level lowering achieved within four weeks in hypercholesterolemic patients and maximal triglyceride and cholesterol level lowering in hypertriglyceridemic patients achieved in two weeks. Maximum high-density lipoprotein increases occurred after four weeks in type II A patients and 12 to 16 weeks in type II B patients. Fenofibrate is a well-tolerated drug in the fibric acid series and has putatively beneficial effects on triglyceride, very low-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations in both type II A and type II B hyperlipidemic patients. If the lipid hypothesis of atherosclerosis applies to the lipoprotein changes induced by fenofibrate, reductions in cardiovascular disease risk in both type II A and II B hyperlipidemic patients should result from fenofibrate treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Lipoprotein particle analysis comparing simvastatin and fenofibrate.

This study compares the effects of fenofibrate and simvastatin in primary hypercholesterolemia, with particular regard to lipoprotein particles, as defined by their apolipoprotein composition: LpAI, LpAII: AI, LpE:B, LpCIII:B. This was a double-blind study in which patients were randomized to 2 groups, one receiving simvastatin 20 mg once daily and the other receiving fenofibrate 200 mg b.i.d., if their total cholesterol and their LDL cholesterol remained above 7.60 mmol/l (300 mg/dl) and 4.95 mmol/l (195 mg/dl) after a 4-week placebo period. Simvastatin dosage was doubled at the end of 6 weeks of therapy if the LDL-cholesterol level remained above 3.55 mmol/l (140 mg/dl). Analyses were done after 6 and 10 weeks of therapy. Apolipoprotein AI was increased significantly only at week 10 with fenofibrate (+7.4%). Simvastatin had a more pronounced effect than fenofibrate on apolipoprotein B. There was a significant difference between drugs at weeks 6 and 10. No change was observed in the LpAII:AI level with simvastatin, whereas fenofibrate increased these particles quite significantly (+13.9 and +22.3%). The drugs had opposite effects on LpAI (+2.5 and +5.6% with simvastatin; -12.8 and -15.1% with fenofibrate). LP E:B (-33.0 and -40.8% with simvastatin; -53.8 and -52.2% with fenofibrate) and LpCIII:B (-23.8 and -31.8% with simvastatin; -35.1 and -43.5% with fenofibrate) were decreased by both drugs, but fenofibrate was significantly more effective in reducing these particles than simvastatin at week 6. This study suggests that both drugs led to different structural modifications of the lipoproteins, which would not be revealed by total apolipoprotein analysis. These differences are probably related to the mechanisms of action of these drugs.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between fenofibrate and ezetimibe: A phase I, open-label, multiple-dose, three-period crossover study in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between fenofibrate and ezetimibe in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was a Phase I, open-label, multiple-dose,3-period crossover study conducted in healthy adult men and women. Subjects received fenofibrate 145 mg alone, fenofibrate 145 mg with ezetimibe 10 mg, and ezetimibe 10 mg alone for 10 consecutive days, in an order determined by computerized randomization schedule. Blood samples were collected for up to 24 hours after dosing on study day 1 and up to 120 hours after dosing on study day 10 for determination of plasma concentrations of fenofibric acid, unconjugated (free) ezetimibe, and total (conjugated and unconjugated) ezetimibe using validated high-performance liquid chromatography methods with mass-spectrometric detection. Ezetimibe glucuronide concentrations were estimated by subtracting free ezetimibe concentrations from total ezetimibe concentrations. RESULTS: Eighteen healthy adults (12 men, 6 women; 17 white, 1 black) were enrolled in the study. Their mean age was 43.4 years (range, 27-55 years), their mean weight 78.7 kg (range, 60-98 kg), and their mean height 174.9 cm (range, 156-194 cm). Coadministration of multiple doses of fenofibrate and ezetimibe produced no statistically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of fenofibric acid but significantly increased exposures to total ezetimibe and ezetimibe glucuronide (P < 0.05). Using point estimates, co-administration of fenofibrate and ezetimibe increased AUC central values for total ezetimibe and ezetimibe glucuronide by 43% (90% CI, 29-59) and 49% (90% CI, 34-65), respectively. CONCLUSION: In these healthy volunteers, coadministration of multiple doses of fenofibrate and ezetimibe had no statistically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of fenofibric acid but was associated with a significant increase in exposure to total ezetimibe and its metabolite ezetimibe glucuronide.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: an update on fenofibrate.

The inverse relation between coronary artery disease and the concentration of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is well established. A low HDL-C concentration is frequently accompanied by the features of the metabolic syndrome found in patients with type 2 diabetes and in individuals who are abdominally obese. Results from 3 independent trials are consistent in showing that fenofibrate is able to increase HDL-C levels across a wide range of dyslipidemic states. The HDL-C-increasing effect of fenofibrate is proportionately greater when baseline levels are low. Comparing results from published trials, the absolute increase in HDL-C produced by fenofibrate is greater than that with statins across all baseline HDL-C levels, and a 40-mg/dL treatment target HDL-C level is more likely to be achieved with fenofibrate therapy. Fenofibrate has favorable pleiotropic effects on several features of the metabolic syndrome, which are likely to explain the clinical benefits of fibrate therapy, beyond an impact on HDL-C levels. The additional reciprocal beneficial effect of fenofibrate in lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) benefits those patients with low HDL-C and moderately increased LDL-C; the American Diabetes Association now recommends fibrate therapy in this case. Another trial, the Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study (DAIS) has also provided angiographic evidence to show that fenofibrate treatment may slow coronary artery disease progression in type 2 diabetes. Treatment effects on apolipoproteins suggest that not all fibrates affect HDL-C to an equal degree. A trial with fenofibrate focusing on coronary artery disease risk and mortality reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes that is currently under way, the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial is expected to report in 2005.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed2002

Effects of fenofibrate on high-density lipoprotein particle size in patients with hyperlipidemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Fenofibrate lowers serum total cholesterol and triglyceride levels while it elevates serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of fenofibrate on the particle size of high-density lipoprotein (HDL). METHODS: Patients with hyperlipidemia (as defined by serum triglyceride level > or = 150 mg/dL in the fasting state) were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, crossover study. Fenofibrate 300 mg (corresponding to 200 mg of micronized fenofibrate) or placebo was administered orally once daily after dinner for 8 weeks, followed by crossover of the 2 drugs for an additional 8 weeks. RESULTS: Fifty hyperlipidemic patients (31 men, 19 women; mean [SD] age, 54.6 [12.7] years) were enrolled. Serum total cholesterol and triglyceride levels were significantly reduced with fenofibrate treatment compared with placebo (9.4% [P = 0.007] and 34.4% [P < 0.001], respectively), whereas HDL-C levels were significantly elevated (by 25.8% [P < 0.001]). Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity, LPL protein level, and hepatic triglyceride lipase activity increased by 10.5%, 13.4%, and 11.4%, respectively, with fenofibrate compared with placebo. HDL was classified into 3 groups by particle size: HDL3 <88 A; HDL2a > or = 88 A but <98 A; and HDL2b > or = 98 A. The amount of HDL3 increased significantly with fenofibrate compared with placebo (P < 0.001). Fenofibrate was well tolerated during the study. Abnormal clinical laboratory values were noted in 20 of 48 patients (41.7%), but these events were mild and not clinically significant. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these findings indicate that fenofibrate therapy increased the HDL subfraction with the smallest diameter (HDL3), which is largely responsible for withdrawing cholesterol from peripheral cells.

Adult↗