[Emergency treatment of facial injuries (author's transl)].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Facial injuries in the context of alcohol abuse are a common presentation to casualty departments. While the majority are self limiting, the presence of periorbital or facial oedema should alert physicians to the development of periorbital necrotizing fasciitis. Here, a case illustrates this unusual manifestation of streptococcal infection, and emphasises the rapid onset and devastating systemic and local cosmetic consequences of this condition.
Victims of facial trauma require global, and not exclusively surgical, management. We describe the psychological and psychiatric problems associated with facial trauma and emphasize the need for psychiatric care to complete surgical treatment in facial trauma.
OBJECTIVE: In contrast to epidemiologic studies on facial injuries reporting on dental trauma, facial bone fractures with dentoalveolar injuries, or soft tissue injuries individually, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall place of dental trauma in facial injuries. This was a retrospective investigation of the impact of sport, work, violence, traffic, household, and play accidents in the relationships among dental trauma, facial trauma, and other concomitant trauma. Finally, preventive considerations are discussed. STUDY DESIGN: Six thousand patients registered at the University Hospital of Innsbruck's Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery during a period of 6 years 4 months were admitted for dental trauma, facial trauma, or both. Records were analyzed for cause of injury, age, gender, monthly distribution, frequency, type of injury, and frequency of dental trauma in relation to facial injuries and concomitant injuries. RESULTS: The incidence of dental injuries with respect to the total number of facial injuries was as follows: 57.8% in play and household accidents, 50.1% in sports accidents, 38.6% in accidents at work, 35.8% in acts of violence, 34.2% in traffic accidents, and 31% in unspecified accidents. The overall incidence revealed was 48.25%. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the fact that in the mosaic of traumatic injuries, the frequencies of tooth trauma and its sequelae are underestimated and that such trauma and sequelae occur without a predictable pattern of intensity and extensiveness. Preventive approaches are the sole way to minimize the number of these injuries. Substantial progress made in treating facial and dental trauma in the last 2 decades only improves functional and esthetic outcomes among the population that has suffered dental injury.
BACKGROUND: Many studies have recently noted a shift in the causative mechanism of facial injuries away from traffic accident to assaults. AIMS: Our study aimed to investigate patterns of facial injuries in trauma patients during 13 months study of trauma patients in six general hospitals in Tehran. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Trauma patients who were hospitalized for more than 24 hours and had sustained injuries within seven days from admission were included in the study. Of the 8000 trauma patients, four hundred (5%) sustained facial injuries. RESULTS: Male to female ratio was 4.5:1. Among them, 53.3% were aged 11-30 years. Traffic accidents were by the far the commonest cause of injury. Motorcyclists who wore a helmet sustained facial fractures less often during traffic accident than those patients who did not wear helmet. Soft tissue injury and facial bone fracture comprised 43.3% and 40.8% of facial injuries, respectively. The majority of Soft tissue injuries (79%) were located extra orally. The mandible and nasal bone were the most commonly fractured facial bones. Victims of assault sustained more severe injuries compared to those involved in falls and traffic accidents. CONCLUSIONS: Use of helmets by motorcyclists and the separation of pedestrians routes from motor vehicles could reduce the number of victims and consequently injuries due to road traffic accidents. For implementation of effective prevention programs for reduction of facial injuries due to assault, it seems to be necessary to conduct studies investigating causes and pattern of injuries resulting in assault.
PURPOSE: To establish a Facial Injury Severity Scale (FISS) that correlates with patient outcome and provides a practical tool for communication between clinicians and healthcare personnel for management of facial trauma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) at Legacy Emanuel Hospital (Level One Trauma Center) in Portland, Oregon between 01/1993 and 6/2003 with facial fractures with or without concomitant non-facial injuries where identified retrospectively. The diagnosis and treatment of all facial fractures were conducted by the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) service. The following data were collected; age, gender, mechanism of injury, detailed diagnosis of facial fractures, disposition, and the length of hospital stay (LOS). The hospital operating room charges (ORC) for the treatment of each patient's facial fractures were also obtained. We designed the FISS to be a numeric value composed of the sum of the individual fractures and fracture patterns in a patient. Not all fractures of the face are weighted equally in the FISS because not all fracture patterns are equal in severity. Individual fracture points within the scale were optimized to result in the highest correlation. RESULTS: A total of 1,115 patient admissions to the ED with blunt or penetrating maxillofacial injuries were identified and reviewed. Full information on operating room charges (ORC) was available for 247 patients (average age: 32, SD +/- 17; range, 2 to 84; male:female, 3:1; blunt:penetrating, 232:15). The FISS scores were calculated for each patient (average FISS: 4.4, SD +/- 2.7; range, 1 to 13). Hospital ORC for the treatment of each patient's maxillofacial injuries were obtained from the hospital financial services (average ORC: 4,135 dollars, SD +/- 2,832 dollars; range, 845 dollars to 18,974 dollars). A significant correlation was identified between the FISS and the ORC (R value = .82). The length of stay was significantly associated with the FISS (t = 4.7, 245 degrees of freedom, P = .000004). Although the association was statistically significant, FISS is not a very good predictor of length of stay. The correlation between the predicted and observed values was 0.38. There were 3 deaths among the 247 entries. Those 3 deaths had higher than average FISS scores, but the difference between the scores of survivors and non-survivors was not significant (P = .08). The number of deaths was small and a larger study would be required to resolve this question. CONCLUSIONS: We introduce a FISS that is easily calculated and reliably predicts the severity of maxillofacial injuries as measured by the operating room charges required to treat the facial injury. The scale is also an indicator of hospital length of stay. We anticipate this to be a valuable tool for assessment and management of maxillofacial trauma.
Over a period of one year 20 549 new patients attended an accident and emergency department. Of these patients, 15 555 were victims of accidents, including 875 who had sustained facial injuries. This latter group comprised 609 patients with soft tissue trauma and 266 with skeletal injury. The frequency, aetiology, age and sex distribution of the facial injuries were analysed and compared with other published statistical surveys of facial injury. It is concluded that facial injuries constitute a significant proportion of the work of a civilian accident unit and that any accident service must have adequate facilities for the management of these injuries.
In automobile accidents, the facial area is the most frequently injured body region in passenger car occupants. Laboratory studies have indicated that the tolerance of facial bones to impact is relatively low. Most of these facial injuries are rated as minor. The windshield, steering wheel, and instrument panel are the major points of contact. Restraints, lap belts, and lap-shoulder belts reduce the frequency of facial injuries at all levels of severity and also reduce the more severe and serious injuries to other body regions.
PURPOSE: To describe control of the airway in a patient with severe maxillo-facial injury using intubating laryngeal mask guided awake fibreoptic intubation. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 110 kg man presented with a severe facial injury due to a horse kick. Local examination showed a large transverse gaping laceration just beneath the nose, exposing the lower nasal cavities through to the posterior nasopharynx. It was planned to perform a surgical tracheostomy before surgical fixation of the maxilla and nasal bones. Considering the patient's weight, short neck and difficulty in lying flat, surgical tracheostomy under general anesthesia was considered the best option. Under topical anesthesia, an intubating laryngeal mask was introduced followed by a fibreoptic bronchscope. The endotracheal tube was threaded over the bronchoscope and airway control achieved. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an intubating laryngeal mask avoids the need for manipulation of the head and neck and acts as a 'shield' for the fibreoptic bronchoscope from surrounding blood in patients with maxillo-facial injury. The use of the fibreoptic bronchoscope ensures intubation under vision.
BACKGROUND: Domestic violence exists in all communities across the world. Healthcare services have a pivotal role in the identification, assessment and response to domestic violence. As the face is a common target in assault, dentists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons are in a unique position to screen for domestic violence in the context of presentation of dental and facial injury. Owing to lack of training, dentists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons may not be the best persons to give advice to someone experiencing domestic violence. Improper advice such as encouragement to leave an abusive relationship may escalate the frequency of violence. It may be more appropriate to refer to specialist agencies for intervention and support. It would, therefore be useful to know whether screening and intervention programmes are effective. OBJECTIVES: (1) To assess the benefits and harms of intervention programmes employed to reduce and or prevent domestic violence in adults with dental and/or facial injuries.(2) To assess the benefits and harms of screening and the use of different screening tools in the detection of the proportion of adult victims of domestic violence who present with dental and/or facial injury. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Lilacs databases. No language restrictions were applied. Personal contacts were used and international domestic violence organisations were contacted to identify any unpublished trials. Last search was done February 2004. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials involving adults aged 16 years and over presenting with dental and/or facial injury relating to domestic violence in any healthcare setting. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Screening of eligible studies was conducted in duplicate and independently by two reviewers. Results were to be expressed as random effects models using weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes and relative risk for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity was to be investigated including both clinical and methodological factors. MAIN RESULTS: No eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to support or refute that screening for domestic violence in adults with dental or facial injury is beneficial nor that it causes harm. Screening tools to detect domestic violence exist but no RCTs have specifically evaluated their effectiveness for patients presenting with facial and or dental injuries. There is also lack of evidence that intervention programmes are effective at reducing frequency of physical assaults and at reducing the severity of facial injuries.
Chain-saw kickbacks produce facial injuries with predictable and consistent features. Although the globe is often spared injury, adnexal trauma may have serious import to ocular function. Lid injuries are consistently present and although repaired primarily, late revisions are necessary to restore function. An experience with six chain-saw injury patients is described.
A 17-year experience from 1977 to 1993 with gunshot, shotgun, and high-energy avulsive facial injuries emphasizes the superiority and safety of "ballistic wound" surgical management: (1) immediate stabilization in anatomic position of existing bone, (2) primary closure of existing soft tissue, (3) periodic "second look" serial debridement procedures, and (4) definitive early reconstruction of soft-tissue and bony defects. The series contains 250 gunshot wounds, 53 close-range shotgun wounds, and 15 high-energy avulsive facial injuries. Four general patterns of involvement are noted for both gunshot and shotgun wounds and three for avulsive facial injuries. The treatment algorithm begins with identifying zones of injury and loss for both soft and hard tissue. Gunshot wounds are best classified by the location of the exit wound; shotgun and avulsive facial wounds are classified according to the zone of soft-tissue and bone loss. Treatment, prognosis, and complications vary according to four patterns of gunshot wounds and four patterns of shotgun wounds. Avulsive wounds have not been recommended previously for ballistic wound surgical management. The appropriate management of high-energy avulsive and ballistic facial injuries is best approached by an aggressive treatment program emphasizing initial primary repair of existing tissue, serial conservative debridement, and early definitive reconstruction.
Mountain sports were the cause of 400 facial injuries treated in he Maxillo-facial Surgical Unit in Grenoble over a period of 5 years. Deltaplane injuries are becoming more frequent. Isolated facial injuries represent 57 p. cent of the cases treated. The various types of lesions encountered are described, and the distinction drawn between those treated as emergencies, and those for which urgent treatment could be delayed.
The ability to reconstruct complex facial injuries is still a considerable challenge despite the development of microsurgical techniques. The reconstructive options for conditions such as panfacial burns are severely limited. The result after multiple surgical procedures in this group is often poor in terms of function and cosmesis. Facial transplantation provides a potential solution, but opinion is currently divided about the extent to which the potential benefits to the quality of life can be justified when weighed against the technical, psychological and immunological risks. This paper reviews the current status of the debate and argues that a rigorous research strategy is the only logical basis for countering the ethical objections to a procedure that offers considerable benefits over existing reconstructive options.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Each year, in the United states, approximately 900 persons die from injuries due to bicycle crashes and over 500,000 persons are treated in emergency departments. Head injury is by far the greatest risk posed to bicyclists, comprising one-third of emergency department visits, two-thirds of hospital admissions, and three-fourths of deaths. Facial injuries to cyclists occur at a rate nearly identical to that of head injuries. Although it makes inherent sense that helmets would be protective against head injury, establishing the real-world effectiveness of helmets is important. A number of case-control studies have been conducted demonstrating the effectiveness of bicycle helmets. Because of the magnitude of the problem and the potential effectiveness of bicycle helmets, the objective of this review is to determine whether bicycle helmets reduce head, brain and facial injury for bicyclists of all ages involved in a bicycle crash or fall. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether bicycle helmets reduce head, brain and facial injury for bicyclists of all ages involved in a bicycle crash or fall. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Sport, ERIC, NTIS, Expanded Academic Index, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Occupational Safety and Health, and Dissertations Abstracts. We checked reference lists of past reviews and review articles, studies from government agencies in the United States, Europe and Australia, and contacted colleagues from the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, World Injury Network, CDC funded Injury Control and Research Centers, and staff in injury research agencies around the world. SELECTION CRITERIA: Controlled studies that evaluated the effect of helmet use in a population of bicyclists who had experienced a crash. We required that studies have complete outcome ascertainment, accurate exposure measurement, appropriate selection of the comparison group and elimination or control of factors such as selection bias, observation bias and confounding. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Five published studies met the selection criteria. Two abstractors using a standard abstraction form independently abstracted data. Odds ratios with 95% CI were calculated for the protective effect of helmet for head and facial injuries. Study results are presented individually. Head and brain injury results were also summarized using meta-analysis techniques. MAIN RESULTS: No randomized controlled trials were found. This review identified five well conducted case control studies which met our selection criteria. Helmets provide a 63%-88% reduction in the risk of head, brain and severe brain injury for all ages of bicyclists. Helmets provide equal levels of protection for crashes involving motor vehicles (69%) and crashes from all other causes (68%). Injuries to the upper and mid facial areas are reduced 65%. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Helmets reduce bicycle-related head and facial injuries for bicyclists of all ages involved in all types of crashes including those involving motor vehicles.
This study is an investigation into the number and type of facial injuries due to sports and games, because no detailed information on these dental misfortunes could be found in the literature. The group investigated consisted of 319 patients, treated at the Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Nijmegen in the period January 1, 1971-December 31, 1978. Facial injuries were classified into different types of fractures according to site as also were further series of associated injuries. Males were shown to be more prone to facial injuries than females (2.4:1). In the age group 15-40 years, males proved to be more prone to such injuries than the age group under 15 years. The major part of the injuries is due to fractures of the alveolar process and/or luxation of teeth (59.6%), the zygomatic bone and arch (24.2%) and the mandible (15.3%). Fractures of the maxilla and the nose were rarely seen.