Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Evolutionary”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

A Bayesian evolutionary distance for parametrically aligned sequences.

There is an inherent relationship between the process of pairwise sequence alignment and the estimation of evolutionary distance. This relationship is explored and made explicit. Assuming an evolutionary model and given a specific pattern of observed base mismatches, the relative probabilities of evolution at each evolutionary distance are computed using a Bayesian framework. The mean or the median of this probability distribution provides a robust estimate of the central value. The evolutionary distance has traditionally been computed as zero for an observed homology of 20 bases with no mismatches; we prove that it is highly probable that the distance is greater than 0.01. The mean of the distribution is 0.047, which is a better estimate of the evolutionary distance. Bayesian estimates of the evolutionary distance incorporate arbitrary prior information about variable mutation rates both over time and along sequence position, thus requiring only a weak form of the molecular-clock hypothesis. The endpoints of the similarity between genomic DNA sequences are often ambiguous. The probability of evolution at each evolutionary distance can be estimated over the entire set of alignments by choosing the best alignment at each distance and the corresponding probability of duplication at that evolutionary distance. A central value of this distribution provides a robust evolutionary distance estimate. We provide an efficient algorithm for computing the parametric alignment, considering evolutionary distance as the only parameter. These techniques and estimates are used to infer the duplication history of the genomic sequence in C. elegans and in S. cerevisiae. Our results indicate that repeats discovered using a single scoring matrix show a considerable bias in subsequent evolutionary distance estimates.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Remembering the evolutionary Freud.

Throughout his career as a writer, Sigmund Freud maintained an interest in the evolutionary origins of the human mind and its neurotic and psychotic disorders. In common with many writers then and now, he believed that the evolutionary past is conserved in the mind and the brain. Today the "evolutionary Freud" is nearly forgotten. Even among Freudians, he is regarded to be a red herring, relevant only to the extent that he diverts attention from the enduring achievements of the authentic Freud. There are three ways to explain these attitudes. First, the evolutionary Freud's key work is the "Overview of the Transference Neurosis" (1915). But it was published at an inopportune moment, forty years after the author's death, during the so-called "Freud wars." Second, Freud eventually lost interest in the "Overview" and the prospect of a comprehensive evolutionary theory of psychopathology. The publication of The Ego and the Id (1923), introducing Freud's structural theory of the psyche, marked the point of no return. Finally, Freud's evolutionary theory is simply not credible. It is based on just-so stories and a thoroughly discredited evolutionary mechanism, Lamarckian use-inheritance. Explanations one and two are probably correct but also uninteresting. Explanation number three assumes that there is a fundamental difference between Freud's evolutionary narratives (not credible) and the evolutionary accounts of psychopathology that currently circulate in psychiatry and mainstream journals (credible). The assumption is mistaken but worth investigating.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, the genetic code, and the evolutionary process.

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) and their relationship to the genetic code are examined from the evolutionary perspective. Despite a loose correlation between codon assignments and AARS evolutionary relationships, the code is far too highly structured to have been ordered merely through the evolutionary wanderings of these enzymes. Nevertheless, the AARSs are very informative about the evolutionary process. Examination of the phylogenetic trees for each of the AARSs reveals the following. (i) Their evolutionary relationships mostly conform to established organismal phylogeny: a strong distinction exists between bacterial- and archaeal-type AARSs. (ii) Although the evolutionary profiles of the individual AARSs might be expected to be similar in general respects, they are not. It is argued that these differences in profiles reflect the stages in the evolutionary process when the taxonomic distributions of the individual AARSs became fixed, not the nature of the individual enzymes. (iii) Horizontal transfer of AARS genes between Bacteria and Archaea is asymmetric: transfer of archaeal AARSs to the Bacteria is more prevalent than the reverse, which is seen only for the "gemini group. " (iv) The most far-ranging transfers of AARS genes have tended to occur in the distant evolutionary past, before or during formation of the primary organismal domains. These findings are also used to refine the theory that at the evolutionary stage represented by the root of the universal phylogenetic tree, cells were far more primitive than their modern counterparts and thus exchanged genetic material in far less restricted ways, in effect evolving in a communal sense.

Amino Acids↗
PubMed1997

The relationship between evolutionary theory and phylogenetic analysis.

The relationship between phylogenetic reconstruction and evolutionary theory is reassessed. It is argued here that phylogenies, and evolutionary principles, should be analysed initially as independently from each other as possible. Only then can they be used to test one another. If the phylogenies and evolutionary principles are totally consistent with one another, this consilience of independent lines of evidence increases confidence in both. If, however, there is a conflict, then one should assess the relative support for each hypothesis, and tentatively accept the more strongly supported one. We review examples where the phylogenetic hypothesis is preferred over the evolutionary principle, and vice versa, and instances where the conflict cannot be readily resolved. Because the analyses of pattern and process must initially be kept separate, the temporal order in which they are performed is unimportant. Therefore, the widespread methodology of always proceeding from cladogram to evolutionary 'scenario' cannot be justified philosophically. Such an approach means that cladograms cannot be properly tested against evolutionary principles, and that evolutionary 'scenarios' have no independent standing. Instead, we propose the 'consilience' approach where phylogenetic and evolutionary hypotheses are formulated independently from each other and then examined for agreement.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Evolutionary ethics from Darwin to Moore.

Evolutionary ethics has a long history, dating all the way back to Charles Darwin. Almost immediately after the publication of the Origin, an immense interest arose in the moral implications of Darwinism and whether the truth of Darwinism would undermine traditional ethics. Though the biological thesis was certainly exciting, nobody suspected that the impact of the Origin would be confined to the scientific arena. As one historian wrote, 'whether or not ancient populations of armadillos were transformed into the species that currently inhabit the new world was certainly a topic about which zoologists could disagree. But it was in discussing the broader implications of the theory...that tempers flared and statements were made which could transform what otherwise would have been a quiet scholarly meeting into a social scandal' (Farber 1994, 22). Some resistance to the biological thesis of Darwinism sprung from the thought that it was incompatible with traditional morality and, since one of them had to go, many thought that Darwinism should be rejected. However, some people did realize that a secular ethics was possible so, even if Darwinism did undermine traditional religious beliefs, it need not have any effects on moral thought. Before I begin my discussion of evolutionary ethics from Darwin to Moore, I would like to make some more general remarks about its development. There are three key events during this history of evolutionary ethics. First, Charles Darwin published On the Origin of the Species (Darwin 1859). Since one did not have a fully developed theory of evolution until 1859, there exists little work on evolutionary ethics until then. Shortly thereafter, Herbert Spencer (1898) penned the first systematic theory of evolutionary ethics, which was promptly attacked by T.H. Huxley (Huxley 1894). Second, at about the turn of the century, moral philosophers entered the fray and attempted to demonstrate logical errors in Spencer's work; such errors were alluded to but never fully brought to the fore by Huxley. These philosophers were the well known moralists from Cambridge: Henry Sidgwick (Sidgwick 1902, 1907) and G.E. Moore (Moore 1903), though their ideas hearkened back to David Hume (Hume 1960). These criticisms were so strong that the industry of evolutionary ethics was largely abandoned (though with some exceptions) for many years. Third, E.O. Wilson, a Harvard entomologist, published Sociobiology: The New Synthesis in 1975 (Wilson E.O. 1975), which sparked renewed interest in evolutionary ethics and offered new directions of investigation. These events suggest the following stages for the history of evolutionary ethics: development, criticism and abandonment, revival. In this paper, I shall focus on the first two stages, since those are the ones on which the philosophical merits have already been largely decided. The revival stage is still in progress and we shall eventually find out whether it was a success.

Biological Evolution↗
PubMed2003

Ecological aspects of the evolutionary processes.

Darwin in his On the Origin of species made it clear that evolutionary change depends on the combined action of two different causes, the first being the origin of genetically based phenotypic variation in the individual organisms comprising the population and the second being the action of selective agents of the external environment placing demands on the individual organisms. For over a century following Darwin, most evolutionists focused on the origin of inherited variation and its transmission; many workers continue to regard genetics to be the core of evolutionary theory. Far less attention has been given to the exact nature of the selective agents with most evolutionists still treating this cause imprecisely to the detriment of our understanding of both nomological and historical evolutionary theory. Darwin was vague in the meaning of his new concept of "Natural Selection," using it interchangeably as one of the causes for evolutionary change and as the final outcome (= evolutionary change). In 1930, natural selection was defined clearly as "non-random, differential reproduction of genes" by R. Fisher and J.B.S. Haldane which is a statement of the outcome of evolutionary process and which omits mention of the causes bringing about this change. Evolutionists quickly accepted this outcome definition of natural selection, and have used interchangeably selection both as a cause and as the result of evolutionary change, causing great confusion. Herein, the details will be discussed of how the external environment (i.e., the environment-phenotype interaction) serves as selective agents and exerts demands on the phenotypic organisms. Included are the concepts of fitness and of the components of fitness (= adaptations) which are respectively (a) survival, (b) direct reproductive and (c) indirect reproductive features. Finally, it will be argued that historical-narrative analyses of organisms, including classification and phylogenetic history, are possible only with a full understanding of nomological evolutionary theory and with functional/adaptive studies of the employed taxonomic features in addition to the standard comparative investigations.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1997

Inference for phylogenies under a hybrid parsimony method: evolutionary-symmetric transversion parsimony.

A new method is proposed for inferring topology for evolutionary trees. Existing methods have complementary strengths and weaknesses. Maximum and transversion parsimony are powerful methods, but they lack statistical consistency, that is, they do not always infer the correct tree as the sequence length becomes very large. Evolutionary parsimony overcomes this deficiency, but it may lack sufficient power when sequence length is small (less than 1000 aligned nucleotides; Sinsheimer, Lake, and Little, 1996, Biometrics 52, 193-210). Our proposed method, evolutionary-symmetric transversion parsimony, is a hybrid that retains the consistency of evolutionary parsimony, while increasing power by incorporating a modified form of transversion parsimony within a statistical model. The method requires choice of a parameter gamma that represents the prior probability that symmetric transversion parsimony yields consistent results. Properties of the method are assessed for a variety of choices of gamma in a large simulation study. In general, inference under the evolutionary-symmetric transversion parsimony has more discriminating power than inference under evolutionary parsimony and is better calibrated than inference under symmetric transversion parsimony. The results are quite robust to the choice of gamma, indicating a value of 0.90 as a reasonable overall choice when the true value of gamma ranges between 0.85 to 1.00. Our method is, like evolutionary parsimony and maximum parsimony, computationally straightforward. The same statistical approach can be applied to combine evolutionary parsimony with other inconsistent methods, such as maximum parsimony, but at the expense of more difficult computations.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Evolutionary algorithms and a fractal inverse problem.

Over the past 30 years, algorithms that model natural evolution have generated robust search methods. These so-called evolutionary algorithms have been successfully applied to a wide range of problems. This paper discusses two types of evolutionary algorithms and their application to a problem in shape representation. Genetic algorithms and evolutionary programming, although both based on evolutionary principles, each place different emphasis on what drives the evolutionary process. While genetic algorithms rely on mimicking specific genotypic transformations, evolutionary programming emphasizes phenotypic adaptation. Results presented show the success of evolutionary programming in solving an example of a fractal inverse problem, but indicate that a genetic algorithm is not as successful. Reasons for this disparity are discussed.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2004

Evolutionary tradeoff and equilibrium in an aquatic predator-prey system.

Due to the conventional distinction between ecological (rapid) and evolutionary (slow) timescales, ecological and population models have typically ignored the effects of evolution. Yet the potential for rapid evolutionary change has been recently established and may be critical to understanding how populations persist in changing environments. In this paper we examine the relationship between ecological and evolutionary dynamics, focusing on a well-studied experimental aquatic predator-prey system (Fussmann et al., 2000, Science, 290, 1358-1360; Shertzer et al., 2002, J. Anim. Ecol., 71, 802-815; Yoshida et al., 2003, Nature, 424, 303-306). Major properties of predator-prey cycles in this system are determined by ongoing evolutionary dynamics in the prey population. Under some conditions, however, the populations tend to apparently stable steady-state densities. These are the subject of the present paper. We examine a previously developed model for the system, to determine how evolution shapes properties of the equilibria, in particular the number and identity of coexisting prey genotypes. We then apply these results to explore how evolutionary dynamics can shape the responses of the system to 'management': externally imposed alterations in conditions. Specifically, we compare the behavior of the system including evolutionary dynamics, with predictions that would be made if the potential for rapid evolutionary change is neglected. Finally, we posit some simple experiments to verify our prediction that evolution can have significant qualitative effects on observed population-level responses to changing conditions.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Evolutionary theory, psychiatry, and psychopharmacology.

Darwin's seminal publications in the nineteenth century laid the foundation for an evolutionary approach to psychology and psychiatry. Advances in 20th century evolutionary theory facilitated the development of evolutionary psychology and psychiatry as recognized areas of scientific investigation. In this century, advances in understanding the molecular basis of evolution, of the mind, and of psychopathology, offer the possibility of an integrated approach to understanding the proximal (psychobiological) and distal (evolutionary) mechanisms of interest to psychiatry and psychopharmacology. There is, for example, growing interest in the question of whether specific genetic variants mediate psychobiological processes that have evolutionary value in specific contexts, and of the implications of this for understanding the vulnerability to psychopathology and for considering the advantages and limitations of pharmacotherapy. The evolutionary value, and gene-environmental mediation, of early life programming is potentially a particularly rich area of investigation. Although evolutionary approaches to psychology and to medicine face important conceptual and methodological challenges, current work is increasingly sophisticated, and may prove to be an important foundational discipline for clinicians and researchers in psychiatry and psychopharmacology.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Evolutionary morphology and Evo-devo: hierarchy and novelty.

Although the role of morphology in evolutionary theory remains a subject of debate, assessing the contributions of morphological investigation to evolutionary developmental biology (Evo-devo) is a more circumscribed issue of direct relevance to ongoing research. Historical studies of morphologically oriented researchers and the formation of the Modern Synthesis in the Anglo-American context identify a recurring theme: the synthetic theory of evolution did not capture multiple levels of biological organization. When this feature is incorporated into a philosophical framework for explaining the origin of evolutionary innovations and novelties (a core domain of inquiry in Evo-devo) two specific roles for morphology can be described: (1) the conceptualization and operational identification of the targets of explanation; and (2) the elucidation of causal interactions at higher levels of organization during ontogeny and through evolutionary time. These roles are critical components of any adequate explanation of innovation and novelty though not exhaustive of the parts played by morphology in evolutionary investigation. They also invite reflection on what counts as an evolutionary cause in contemporary evolutionary biology.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Gene competition and the possible evolutionary role of tumours.

The evolutionary role of tumours might consist of providing the conditions for the expression of evolutionary new genes and thus in providing the material for the origin of new cell types. To approach this concept the principle of gene competition is essential. With an increase in gene number in the genomes of the evolving multicellular organisms the enforcement of gene competition should take place. Therefore, the pre-existing cell types possess limited possibilities for the expression of evolutionary new genes. Like evolutionary new genes originated from extra copies (duplicates) of old genes, evolutionary new cell types had to originate from extra cells which were not functionally necessary to the organism. Tumours could have supplied the evolving multicellular organisms with extra cells for the expression of originating evolutionary new genes. Of course, on the basis of this proposal only tumours at the earlier stages of progression are considered to be meaningful, or some kind of tumour-like processes, but not malignant tumours at late stages of progression. The evolutionary new genes originate in the DNA of germ line cells but not in DNA of tumour cells. Until the moment of their expression in the tumour cells these genes could stay silent. After the expression of these genes tumour cells should acquire the function in the organism, differentiate and lose their previous autonomy. The organisms with a new cell type should then be selected against their fitness and competitive abilities.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The concept of developmental reprogramming and the quest for an inclusive theory of evolutionary mechanisms.

Evolutionary developmental biology has already made a major contribution to our understanding of evolutionary patterns, notably homology. However, while it has the potential to make an equally important contribution to our understanding of evolutionary mechanisms, and indeed to the integration of mechanism and pattern, it has not yet done so. This paper explores how this potential may be realized. In particular, I focus on the limitations of present-day neo-Darwinian theory, and indicate how a combination of the neo-Darwinian and "evo-devo" approaches provides a more inclusive view of evolutionary mechanisms with greater explanatory power. There is a particular focus on developmental reprogramming, which lies logically between mutation and selection, yet has been neglected in mainstream evolutionary theory. The inclusion of developmental reprogramming in the list of evolutionary mechanisms leads to a view that the direction of evolutionary change is determined by a combination of internal and external factors, rather than being controlled entirely by the environment.

Biological Evolution↗
PubMed2006

A metabolic network in the evolutionary context: multiscale structure and modularity.

The enormous complexity of biological networks has led to the suggestion that networks are built of modules that perform particular functions and are "reused" in evolution in a manner similar to reusable domains in protein structures or modules of electronic circuits. Analysis of known biological networks has revealed several modules, many of which have transparent biological functions. However, it remains to be shown that identified structural modules constitute evolutionary building blocks, independent and easily interchangeable units. An alternative possibility is that evolutionary modules do not match structural modules. To investigate the structure of evolutionary modules and their relationship to functional ones, we integrated a metabolic network with evolutionary associations between genes inferred from comparative genomics. The resulting metabolic-genomic network places metabolic pathways into evolutionary and genomic context, thereby revealing previously unknown components and modules. We analyzed the integrated metabolic-genomic network on three levels: macro-, meso-, and microscale. The macroscale level demonstrates strong associations between neighboring enzymes and between enzymes that are distant on the network but belong to the same linear pathway. At the mesoscale level, we identified evolutionary metabolic modules and compared them with traditional metabolic pathways. Although, in some cases, there is almost exact correspondence, some pathways are split into independent modules. On the microscale level, we observed high association of enzyme subunits and weak association of isoenzymes independently catalyzing the same reaction. This study shows that evolutionary modules, rather than pathways, may be thought of as regulatory and functional units in bacterial genomes.

Biological Evolution↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Analyses of physiological evolutionary response.

Selection studies are useful if they can provide us with insights into the patterns and processes of evolution in populations under controlled conditions. In this context it is particularly valuable to be able to analyze the limitations of and constraints on evolutionary responses to allow predictions concerning evolutionary change. The concept of a selection pathway is presented as a means of visualizing this predictive process and the constraints that help define the population's response to selection. As pointed out by Gould and Lewontin, history and chance are confounding forces that can mask or distort the adaptive response. Students of the evolutionary responses of organisms are very interested in the effects of these confounding forces, since they play a critical role not only in the laboratory but also in natural selection in the field. In this article, we describe some methods that are a bit different from those used in most studies for examining data from laboratory selection studies. These analytical methods are intended to provide insights into the physiological mechanisms by which evolutionary responses to the environment proceed. Interestingly, selection studies often exhibit disparate responses in replicate populations. We offer methods for analyzing these disparate responses in replicate populations to better understand this very important source of variability in the evolutionary response. We review the techniques of Travisano et al. and show that these approaches can be used to investigate the relative roles of adaptation, history, and chance in the evolutionary responses of populations of Drosophila melanogaster to selection for enhanced desiccation resistance. We anticipate that a wider application of these techniques will provide valuable insights into the organismal, genetic, and molecular nature of the constraints, as well as the factors that serve to enhance or, conversely, to mask the effects of chance. Such studies should help to provide a more detailed understanding of the processes producing evolutionary change in populations.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1998

Understanding developmental psychopathology: how useful are evolutionary accounts?

OBJECTIVE: To consider the power of principles derived from evolutionary biology to explain the causes and determinants of some forms of child and adolescent mental disorders. METHOD: The authors reviewed the scientific literature for evolutionary mechanisms proposed to contribute to the pathogenesis of early-onset disorders. RESULTS: A diverse set of evolutionary mechanisms has been proposed. With the exception of certain genetically determined conditions, many of the proposed mechanisms have little empirical data to support them. One mechanism focuses on the vulnerabilities associated with conserved behavior patterns, such as separation anxiety and other alarm responses. These behavioral patterns are adaptive if they appear in some situations, but not in others. Other attractive theories include a co-optation of underlying neurobiology systems (substance abuse), environmental shifts (transformation of present day environments away from primeval environments), and evolutionary arms races as may occur in putative autoimmune disorders with neuropsychiatric sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Evolutionary biology provides a potentially powerful framework for understanding disease pathogenesis in child psychiatry and should permit the integration of new knowledge from a broad range of scientific disciplines. Evolutionary explanations are typically population-based and fail to account for why a particular individual is disciplines. Evolutionary explanations are typically population-based and fail to account for why a particular individual is affected. Consequently, any adequate account of disease pathogenesis requires that environmental events that impinge on CNS development be considered. Finally, the empirical testing of specific theories may prove to be difficult if not impossible.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Comparative analysis of evolutionary mechanisms of the hemagglutinin and three internal protein genes of influenza B virus: multiple cocirculating lineages and frequent reassortment of the NP, M, and NS genes.

Phylogenetic profiles of the genes coding for the hemagglutinin (HA) protein, nucleoprotein (NP), matrix (M) protein, and nonstructural (NS) proteins of influenza B viruses isolated from 1940 to 1998 were analyzed in a parallel manner in order to understand the evolutionary mechanisms of these viruses. Unlike human influenza A (H3N2) viruses, the evolutionary pathways of all four genes of recent influenza B viruses revealed similar patterns of genetic divergence into two major lineages. Although evolutionary rates of the HA, NP, M, and NS genes of influenza B viruses were estimated to be generally lower than those of human influenza A viruses, genes of influenza B viruses demonstrated complex phylogenetic patterns, indicating alternative mechanisms for generation of virus variability. Topologies of the evolutionary trees of each gene were determined to be quite distinct from one another, showing that these genes were evolving in an independent manner. Furthermore, variable topologies were apparently the result of frequent genetic exchange among cocirculating epidemic viruses. Evolutionary analysis done in the present study provided further evidence for cocirculation of multiple lineages as well as sequestering and reemergence of phylogenetic lineages of the internal genes. In addition, comparison of deduced amino acid sequences revealed a novel amino acid deletion in the HA1 domain of the HA protein of recent isolates from 1998 belonging to the B/Yamagata/16/88-like lineage. It thus became apparent that, despite lower evolutionary rates, influenza B viruses were able to generate genetic diversity among circulating viruses through a combination of evolutionary mechanisms involving cocirculating lineages and genetic reassortment by which new variants with distinct gene constellations emerged.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1996

Towards a unified evolutionary genetics of microorganisms.

I propose here that evolutionary genetics, apart from improving our basic knowledge of the taxonomy and evolution of microbes (either eukaryotes or prokaryotes), can also greatly contribute to applied research in microbiology. Evolutionary genetics provides convenient guidelines for better interpreting genetic and molecular data dealing with microorganisms. The three main potential applications of evolutionary genetics in microbiology are (a) epidemiological follow-up (with the necessity of evaluating the stability of microbial genotypes over space and time); (b) taxonomy in the broad sense (better definition and sharper delimitation of presently described taxa, research of hidden genetic subdivisions); and (c) evaluation of the impact of the genetic diversity of microbes on their relevant properties (pathogenicity, resistance to drugs, etc). At present, two main kinds of population structure can be distinguished in natural microbial populations: (a) species that are not subdivided into discrete phylogenetic lineages (panmictic species or basically sexual species with occasional bouts of short-term clonality fall into this category); (b) species that are strongly subdivided by either cryptic speciation or clonal evolution. Improvements in available statistical methods are required to refine these distinctions and to better quantify the actual impact of gene exchange in natural microbial populations. Moreover, a codified selection of markers with appropriate molecular clocks (in other words: adapted levels of resolution) is sorely needed to answer distinct questions that address different scales of time and space: experimental, epidemic, and evolutionary. The problems raised by natural genetic diversity are very similar for all microbial species, in terms of both basic and applied science. Despite this fact, a regrettable compartmentalization among specialists has hampered progress in this field. I propose a synthetic approach, relying on the statistical improvements and technical standardizations called for above, to settle a unified evolutionary genetics of microorganisms, valid whatever the species studied, whether eukaryotic (parasitic protozoa and fungi) or prokaryotic (bacteria). Apart from benefits for basic evolutionary research, the anticipated payoff from this synthetic approach is to render routine and common-place the use of microbial evolutionary genetics in the fields of epidemiology, medicine, and agronomy.

Animals↗