Carotid endarterectomy in the face of previous contralateral endarterectomy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “ENDARTERECTOMY”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
[Commentary to the articles: SPACE Collaborative Group. 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2006; 368: 1239-47. Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, et al. EVA-3S Investigators. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 1660-71].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Journal Article↗
Early and late results of coronary endarterectomy. Analysis of 3,369 patients.
The effectiveness of coronary revascularization has been questioned in patients with diffuse coronary disease. Over a 14 year period (1970 to 1984), 30,464 patients underwent surgical revascularization at our institution. Coronary artery bypass alone was done in 27,095 patients and was combined with coronary endarterectomy in 3,369 patients (12.4%). Analysis of preoperative variables revealed an increased incidence of male sex, diabetes mellitus, low ejection fraction (less than 30) and multiple vessel disease in patients requiring endarterectomy. The early results after revascularization indicated a small increase in surgical risk after endarterectomy. The 30 day mortality for bypass alone was 2.6% versus 4.4% for coronary endarterectomy (p less than 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified independent predictors of operative risk: ejection fraction less than 30%, reoperation, age, absence of hyperlipidemia, endarterectomy, and female sex. Early mortality was significantly increased by endarterectomy in the left anterior descending coronary artery (8.5%) compared to endarterectomy in arteries other than the left anterior descending (4.2%) (p less than 0.01). In a sample of 4,473 patients, myocardial complications were also found to be increased after coronary endarterectomy. The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients undergoing bypass alone was 2.6% versus 5.4% for patients undergoing bypass plus endarterectomy (p less than 0.01). Both fatal and nonfatal cardiac arrests increased (bypass alone, 1.7%; endarterectomy, 3.5%; p less than 0.01). This suggests the failure mode of unsuccessful endarterectomy. Early mortality after coronary endarterectomy decreased substantially from 1970-1976 (6.4%) to 1977-1984 (3.5%; p less than 0.01). Actuarial analysis at 5 years and longer has shown very little difference in the long-term survival rate (coronary bypass, 90%; coronary endarterectomy, 86%), freedom from angina (coronary artery bypass, 58%; coronary endarterectomy, 52%), and freedom from reoperation (coronary artery bypass, 97%; coronary endarterectomy, 98%). Despite the small increase in surgical risk, the early and late results support the selective application of coronary endarterectomy in patients with diffuse distal disease and demonstrate the beneficial long-term effects.
Actuarial Analysis↗
Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: comparison with patient characteristics and outcomes in younger patients.
OBJECTIVES: Carotid endarterectomy has been shown to be of clear benefit to selected patients. However, recent trials of carotid endarterectomy versus best medical therapy have excluded octogenarians, and some authors have suggested that carotid endarterectomy would have an unfavorable cost-benefit relationship in octogenarians. We compared patients and results for carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians and younger patients. METHODS: We reviewed the results for 582 primary carotid endarterectomies (90 in octogenarians and 492 in younger patients) performed in 528 patients between February 1, 1985, and January 31, 1998 (all data were collected prospectively for the most recent 301 carotid endarterectomies). Conventional surgical technique was used with general anesthesia, selective shunting, and selective patching. Main outcome measures were perioperative and late ipsilateral stroke and death. RESULTS: The two groups were similar with respect to indications for carotid endarterectomy and patient characteristics, except that octogenarians were more likely to have histories of congestive heart failure or hypertension and less likely to have histories of smoking or chronic lung disease. Carotid endarterectomy was performed for asymptomatic disease in 27% of the octogenarians and 33% of the younger patients (P =.31). Stenosis was >/=80% in 90% of the octogenarians and 78% of the younger patients (P =.014). Perioperative strokes, all of which were ipsilateral, occurred in one octogenarian (1.1%) and eight younger patients (1.6%, P = 1.00). No octogenarians and two younger patients died within 30 days of surgery (P = 1.00). Length of stay and direct costs associated with carotid endarterectomy were similar for octogenarians and younger patients. Late strokes occurred in two octogenarians (one ipsilateral) and four younger patients (two ipsilateral). Life table estimates of freedom from ipsilateral stroke at 2 years were 98% and 97% for octogenarians and younger patients, respectively (log-rank P =.69), and life table estimates of patient survival at 4 years were 81% and 89% for octogenarians and younger patients, respectively (P =.11). Octogenarians represented an increasing fraction of the carotid endarterectomies performed during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians selected for carotid endarterectomy were similar to younger patients with respect to indications for carotid endarterectomy and comorbidities. Early mortality, early and late neurologic outcome, complications, and resource utilization were similar for the two groups, and more than 75% of octogenarians survived 4 years after undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Cost-benefit analyses for carotid endarterectomy, which are highly sensitive to expected patient survival, might not be pertinent to individual patient situations. Intellectually intact octogenarians without unusually severe comorbidities are good candidates for and should be offered the benefits of carotid endarterectomy.
Age Factors↗
Saphenous vein patch grafts in carotid endarterectomy.
The clinical data and findings on the early postoperative intravenous digital subtraction angiograms (IVDSA's) were studied in 61 patients undergoing 70 consecutive conventional carotid endarterectomies and in 46 patients undergoing 50 consecutive carotid endarterectomies with a saphenous vein patch graft (SVPG). The IVDSA's were considered normal in 50 of 70 conventional carotid endarterectomies and in 46 of 50 carotid endarterectomies with SVPG (p = 0.004). The internal carotid artery (ICA) origin was consistently larger and had a more normal configuration after carotid endarterectomy with SVPG. Ballooning at the endarterectomy site was an uncommon finding and occurred with similar frequency in both groups; that is, after three conventional carotid endarterectomies and two carotid endarterectomies with SVPG. In the conventional group, early symptomatic thrombosis occurred in the ICA in one patient and in the common carotid artery (CCA), ICA, and external carotid artery (ECA) in two patients. Silent ICA occlusion was seen in three patients in the conventional group. There were no occlusions in the SVPG group (p = 0.04). Stenosis at the distal end of the ICA arteriotomy was found after nine conventional carotid endarterectomies, and was mild (less than or equal to 33% reduction in the lumen) in seven patients, moderate (34% to 66%) in one, and severe (greater than or equal to 67%) in one. Mild distal ICA stenosis was seen in one case after carotid endarterectomy with a SVPG (p = 0.03). Stenosis of 33% or less was found at the proximal end of the CCA arteriotomy after two carotid endarterectomies in the conventional group and one carotid endarterectomy in the SVPG group. Four patients in the conventional group suffered a postoperative cerebral infarct and one patient in the SVPG group suffered a postoperative brain-stem infarct (p = 0.28). The authors' findings have led them to routinely use a SVPG in carotid endarterectomy.
Aged↗
Primary closure of the carotid artery is associated with poorer outcomes during carotid endarterectomy.
INTRODUCTION: Arterial endarterectomy and reconstruction during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can be performed in a variety of ways, including standard endarterectomy with primary closure, standard endarterectomy with patch angioplasty, and eversion endarterectomy. The optimal method of arterial reconstruction remains a matter of controversy. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the method of arterial reconstruction during CEA on perioperative outcome. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive CEAs performed by 81 surgeons during 1997 and 1998 in six regional hospitals was performed. Detailed clinical data regarding each case and all deaths and nonfatal strokes within 30 days of surgery were ascertained by an independent review of the inpatient chart, outpatient surgeon record, and the hospitals' administrative databases. Two physician investigators--one neurologist and one internist--confirmed each adverse event by independently reviewing patients' medical records. RESULTS: A total of 1972 CEAs were performed. The mean age of the patients was 72.3 years, and 57.2% were male. Preoperative neurologic symptoms occurred in 28.7% of cases (n = 566), and the remaining 71.3% were asymptomatic before surgery (n = 1406). The method of arterial reconstruction was chosen by the surgeon. Primary closure was performed in 11.8% (n = 233), patch angioplasty in 69.8% (n = 1377), and eversion endarterectomy in 18.4% (n = 362). There was no significant difference in the preoperative symptom status of patients who underwent primary closure compared with the other methods of reconstruction (72.5% asymptomatic vs 71.1%, p = NS). Primary closure cases were significantly more likely to experience perioperative stroke compared with the other closure techniques (5.6% vs 2.2%, P = .006). Primary closure cases also had a higher incidence of perioperative stroke or death compared with the other closure techniques (6.0% vs 2.5%, P = .006). There were no significant differences with regard to either perioperative stroke, or perioperative stroke/death noted when comparing patch angioplasty with eversion endarterectomy: stroke, 2.2% vs 2.5% (P = NS) and stroke/death, 2.5% vs 2.5% (P = NS) respectively. CONCLUSION: It appears that primary closure is associated with significantly worse perioperative outcomes compared with endarterectomy with patch angioplasty and eversion endarterectomy, even when the preoperative symptom status of the patient cohorts is equivalent. Although some of its advocates have reported that they can properly select appropriate patients for primary closure based on the size of the artery and other factors, the data demonstrate that these patients have poorer outcomes nonetheless. Primary closure during carotid endarterectomy should predominantly be abandoned in favor of either standard endarterectomy with patch angioplasty or eversion endarterectomy.
Aged↗
Risk of prophylactic contralateral carotid endarterectomy.
Fifty-eight patients underwent a prophylactic contralateral carotid endarterectomy following an initial endarterectomy for symptomatic (38 patients) or asymptomatic (20 patients) carotid stenosis. No deaths occurred after either operation. Two (3.4%) minor neurologic deficits occurred after the initial operation and two (3.4%) major and two (3.4%) minor deficits occurred after the prophylactic contralateral carotid endarterectomy. Sixteen (28%) of the initial endarterectomies were associated with perioperative hyper- or hypotensive episodes compared to 35 (60%) of the prophylactic contralateral carotid endarterectomies (p less than 0.001). We did not document an increased risk of surgery in patients undergoing prophylactic contralateral carotid endarterectomy soon after the initial operation. All four neurologic events following a prophylactic contralateral carotid endarterectomy occurred when the operation was performed more than five weeks after the initial endarterectomy. The incidence of perioperative hyper- or hypotension was similar in patients undergoing prophylactic contralateral carotid endarterectomy less than or greater than five weeks after the first operation. Our results suggest that a prophylactic contralateral carotid endarterectomy may be associated with a higher incidence of neurologic complications and hyper- and hypotensive episodes than the initial carotid endarterectomy. Waiting more than five weeks to repair a contralateral asymptomatic carotid stenosis may not enhance the safety of the operation.
Adult↗
Analysis of factors contributing to improved outcome for carotid endarterectomy.
Since carotid endarterectomy was revitalized following the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial and Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study, results have improved. However, types of carotid endarterectomy, indications, risk factors, surgical factors, techniques, and other treatment modalities may be associated with outcomes of carotid endarterectomy. The purpose of this study was to identify those factors in a broad-based carotid endarterectomy patient. This study involved review of the data from 3,644 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy in New York State hospitals. A multivariate statistical model was used to identify significant patient risk factors to examine the association of the process of care and surgical factors, including surgical specialty for outcome of carotid endarterectomy. In-hospital death and stroke rate overall was 1.84%. After adjustment for patient risk factors, specific processes of care, such as eversion endarterectomy, protamine, heparin, or shunt, were associated with lower adverse outcomes relative to patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy without these processes. Similarly, patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy by vascular surgeons had lower adverse outcomes compared to neurosurgeons and general surgeons. This retrospective review showed that processes of care and surgical specialty were significant factors that contributed to outcomes following carotid endarterectomy.
Age Factors↗
Coronary endarterectomy in the current era.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The increasing incidence of diffuse coronary artery disease in the current era challenges cardiac surgeons in accomplishing their goal of complete revascularisation. Although coronary endarterectomy is used with encouraging results in most institutions, there remains some controversy in its indications, technique, and results. The purpose of this review is to highlight the important evolutions of technique in the recent past. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite the increased risk factors and comorbidities in patients presenting with diffuse coronary artery disease requiring coronary endarterectomy, the results of coronary endarterectomy are improving inline with the improvements in the results of conventional coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. The improving results of coronary endarterectomy in the left anterior descending artery are further clarified. The intra- and postoperative use of prostacyclin has been shown to be effective in reducing mortality and perioperative myocardial infarction. The technique of open coronary endarterectomy with on-lay patch bypass grafting has been shown to be safe and effective in reducing mortality and improving patency as compared with the closed (traction) method of coronary endarterectomy. The use of coronary endarterectomy was also found to be effective in the treatment of in-stent restenosis in the setting of diffuse coronary artery disease. The results of off-pump coronary endarterectomy are encouraging and comparable with the conventional coronary endarterectomy using cardiopulmonary bypass. SUMMARY: With the increasing incidence of diffuse coronary artery disease and improving results of coronary endarterectomy, it is vital for cardiac surgeons to have coronary endarterectomy in their armamentarium to achieve complete coronary revascularisation.
Coronary Disease↗
Carotid endarterectomy impairs blood pressure homeostasis by reducing the physiologic baroreflex reserve.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of carotid endarterectomy on blood pressure homeostasis and baroreflex function, with particular reference to the presence or absence of significant contralateral carotid artery disease, we conducted a prospective study in 80 patients with symptomatic extracranial carotid disease undergoing carotid endarterectomy in a regional teaching hospital over 2 years. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups: the control group (n = 37) had no significant contralateral carotid disease; patients in the diseased group (n = 23) had either >70% stenosis or occlusion of the contralateral carotid artery. Seventeen patients with abnormal heart rhythms, poor quality recordings, or with intermediate degrees of contralateral carotid stenosis were excluded. Three patients who had previously undergone contralateral carotid endarterectomy were separately evaluated. Atheromatous plaque was removed from carotid lumen and the baroreflex mechanism received direct intraoperative stimulation before and after carotid endarterectomy. The main outcome measures were (1) the hemodynamic response to the carotid endarterectomy, baroreflex sensitivity, and operating set point (the resting blood pressure, which the baroreflex mechanism maintains) before and after removal of the atheromatous plaque, and (2) the responsiveness of the ipsilateral baroreceptor mechanism to direct stimulation. The impact of the presence of contralateral carotid stenosis on these variables was also evaluated. RESULTS: Patients in the two groups were comparable for preoperative demographic, medication, and hemodynamic variables. Carotid endarterectomy led to a rise in mean arterial pressure from 81.3 +/- 3.9 mm Hg to 103.5 +/- 4.6 mm Hg ( P < .00001) and from 87.6 +/- 4.3 mm Hg to 94.0 +/- 4.5 mm Hg ( P < .003) in the diseased and control groups, respectively. The magnitude of blood pressure response was significantly greater in the diseased group than in the control group ( P < .00001). This hypertensive shift was not accompanied by the expected fall in heart rate. Direct baroreflex stimulation prior to carotid endarterectomy caused a significantly greater response in the diseased group, suggesting sensitization of the ipsilateral carotid baroreceptor in the presence of contralateral carotid disease. Furthermore, the baroreflex response was obliterated after endarterectomy. There were significant reductions in baroreflex sensitivity and a hypertensive shift in the operating set point, the magnitude of which was significantly greater in patients with contralateral carotid disease. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid endarterectomy impairs blood pressure homeostasis through surgical destruction of the ipsilateral carotid baroreflex mechanism. Patients with contralateral carotid stenosis have a reduced baroreflex reserve and show greater baroreflex dysfunction and hemodynamic instability after endarterectomy. These patients are at greater risk of postendarterectomy complications and should be monitored closely.
Aged↗
Clinical follow-up rather than duplex surveillance after carotid endarterectomy.
PURPOSE: The value of duplex surveillance and the significance of contralateral carotid disease after endarterectomy have been assessed. METHODS: Three hundred five patients were observed prospectively after carotid endarterectomy for a median time of 36 months (range, 6 to 96 months), with duplex surveillance performed at 1 day; 1 week; 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; and then each year after endarterectomy. RESULTS: Thirty patients (10%) had ipsilateral symptoms (13 strokes, 17 transient ischemic attacks [TIAs]) at a median time of 6 months (range, 0 to 60 months). Life table analysis demonstrated that ipsilateral stroke was equally common for patients who had > or = 50% restenosis (3% at 36 months) and those who did not (6% at 36 months, p > 0.5). Twenty-three patients (8%) developed symptoms (stroke 5, TIA 14) attributable to the contralateral carotid artery at a median time of 9 months (range, 0 to 36 months) after endarterectomy. By life table analysis, 40% of patients with 70% to 99%, 6% with 50% to 69%, 1% with < 50% contralateral internal carotid stenosis, and 5% with contralateral carotid occlusion at the time of endarterectomy had a contralateral TIA in the 36 months after endarterectomy (p < 0.01). However, contralateral stroke was not significantly more common for patients with severe contralateral internal carotid stenosis demonstrated at the time of endarterectomy (< 50% stenosis, 0%; 50% to 69%, 3%; 70% to 99%, 7%; occlusion, 6% stroke rate at 36 months). Seven of the 32 patients who developed progression of contralateral disease had a TIA, compared with 11 of 227 patients who did not develop progression of contralateral disease (p < 0.01). None of the 12 patients who progressed from a < 70% to a 70% to 99% contralateral stenosis had a stroke. CONCLUSIONS: After carotid endarterectomy restenosis is rarely associated with symptoms; contralateral stroke is rare and is not associated with progressive internal carotid artery disease suitable for endarterectomy. This study has shown no benefit from long-term duplex surveillance after carotid endarterectomy. Selective clinical follow-up of patients who have high-grade contralateral stenoses would appear more appropriate.
Carotid Artery, Internal↗
High-risk carotid endarterectomy: challenges for carotid stent protocols.
BACKGROUND: Carotid angioplasty and stenting is under investigation in clinical trials as an alternative to endarterectomy. Some clinicians have hypothesized that stenting would be applicable for patients at high risk who need carotid revascularization. To further test this hypothesis, we stratified our carotid endarterectomy procedures according to current carotid stent protocols. METHODS: We reviewed our computerized registry and the clinical charts of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy. Each procedure was categorized as high risk or low risk, according to the following six separate high-risk factors: 1, severe cardiac dysfunction; 2, the requirement for combined coronary and carotid vascularization; 3, severe pulmonary dysfunction; 4, contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion; 5, previous ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy; and 6, anatomically limited access for carotid endarterectomy. Rates of stroke at 30 days, cardiac complications, and death were tabulated. RESULTS: Between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2000, 415 carotid endarterectomies were performed on 389 patients. Ninety-eight procedures (23.6%) were classified as high risk on the basis of the following factors: 1, severe cardiac dysfunction (n = 30); 2, requirement for combined coronary and carotid revascularization (n = 14); 3, severe pulmonary dysfunction (n = 8); 4, contralateral carotid occlusion (n = 31); 5, previous ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy (n = 25); and 6, anatomically limited access (n = 4). Seven patients had ipsilateral postoperative strokes (1.7%), with two additional patients having contralateral hemispheric strokes. One patient died from exacerbation of congestive heart failure 9 days after undergoing a second carotid endarterectomy. The total stroke and death rate was 2.6% for all the patients. Two of the 98 procedures in the high-risk group were complicated with ipsilateral stroke (2.0%) as compared with six of the 317 low-risk procedures (1.9%; P = 1). Six procedures were complicated with cardiac dysfunction after surgery, including myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or the new onset of atrial fibrillation. Three cardiac complications occurred in the low-risk group (1%), and three occurred in the high-risk group (3.1%; P =.15). CONCLUSION: This series shows that patients at high risk can undergo carotid endarterectomy with stroke rates equivalent to the rates of patients at low risk. The cardiac morbidity rate may be increased in the high-risk group. Carotid stenting is unlikely to offer any improvement in stroke risk as compared with carotid endarterectomy, but stenting may reduce non-stroke morbidity rates associated with some high-risk cases.
Adult↗
Ultrasonic endarterectomy: experimental and initial clinical results in carotid stenosis.
PURPOSE: The effects of ultrasonic endarterectomy, evaluated experimentally and clinically, were compared with the results obtained with controversial endarterectomy. METHODS EXPERIMENTAL: An ultrasonic vascular dissector with a frequency of 29 kHz was used for ultrasonic endarterectomy. Gross and histologic observation was made on 22 fresh human cadaver atherosclerotic vessels, of which 16 were treated with ultrasound endarterectomy and 6 conventionally. Clinical: Twenty-eight patients requiring carotid endarterectomy were chosen at random. Seven patients underwent ultrasonic endarterectomy after traditional access surgery, while 21 patients were treated with conventional endarterectomy. In the clinical study, an intraoperative gross observation of the endarterectomized surfaces was made, followed by duplex scanning after 18 and 24 months. RESULTS: Histologic observation of the cadaveric revealed particularly smooth surfaces in 87.5%; there was no debris, flaps, or vessel damage in any of the ultrasonically treated samples. In contrast, the traditional technique produced regular surfaces without residual debris in only 50% of the experimental cases. Favorable results were also seen in the clinical carotid experience, in which there was no need to surgically correct the ultrasonically endarterectomized surface in any case. In fact, achieving a satisfactory outcome was greatly facilitated by the use of ultrasound. In the conventionally treated patients, however, only 19% (4) demonstrated a smooth luminal surface on gross observation even after surgical correction. No postoperative complications were encountered in either group, and no restenosis has occurred in ultrasonic endarterectomy-treated patients after 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Favorable experimental results using ultrasonic endarterectomy prompted the successful clinical application of this new technique in carotid stenosis treatment. Whether or not ultrasonic endarterectomy can reduce postoperative morbidity and restenosis is still under study.
Aged↗
[Late results of myocardial revascularization in patients with coronary artery endarterectomy].
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term results after myocardial revascularization in patients with diffuse and distal coronary disease, and to compare this procedure with the classical approach--indirect myocardial revascularization (revascularization without endarterectomy). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was done in the period of three years, and includes patients operated between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 1990 at the University Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery, Novi Sad. 500 patients were included and two groups were made. The investigated group consisted of 251 patients with endarterectomy and control group of 249 patients without endarterectomy. Other parameters (age, gender, preoperative hemodynamic parameters etc.) were practically the same. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality (PM) during immediate 30 postoperative days was 4.64% in the investigated group, and 1.97% in the control group (total PM = 2.66%). The main causes of death were cardiac (3.74%), and the rest of them were respiratory, renal and cerebral. The highest postoperative mortality according to the localization of endarterectomy was left artery descendent (LAD) in the position of the first septal artery (36.36%). The follow-up study included 500 operated patients. The mean follow-up period was 9 years (0-13 years). Cumulative survival curve and postoperative myocardial infarction curve made by Wilcocxon (Gehan) and Kaplan-Meier methods showed no statistically significant difference between groups after 13 years of follow up. Lower incident of new angina was found in the investigated group (p < 0.01). Most of patients show good physical condition, well toleration of the stress test (Bruce protocol) and no significant impairment of ejection fraction. DISCUSSION: Despite its long history and development, endarterectomy of coronary arteries is one of the most controversial methods in cardiac surgery. Application of this method was very restrictive mostly because its complexity and very controversial results from one institution to another. Endarterectomy of the first septal artery has the highest operative risk, but it is the method of choice in full revascularization of this region. Despite higher operative mortality, the immediate and long term results of this study show that endarterectomy of the coronary arteries is a method with very acceptable operative risk. CONCLUSION: Endarterectomy is a good and effective method for direct myocardial revascularization in cases with diffuse coronary disease. It is the best procedure for revascularization of the septum. The number of endarterectomies and low ejection fraction are independent predictors for early and long-term mortality. Endarterectomy is also a method of choice in patients with low ejection fraction and poor coronary bed. Frequent and repeated application of angioplasty, higher incidence of diffuse and distal coronary disease and no available donors for heart transplantation will increase the application of this method. In the future we expect further improvement and complete affirmation of endartrectomy of coronary arteries.
Coronary Artery Disease↗
Racial variations in the rates of carotid angiography and endarterectomy in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack.
BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy is emerging as the treatment of choice for patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis at low operative risk. We sought to determine if racial variations in the rate of carotid angiography and endarterectomy exist in the Veteran Affairs health care system among patients who are insulated from the cost of their care. METHODS: From a national database of all hospitalizations at Veterans Affairs medical centers, we identified a cohort of patients with diagnoses of stroke or transient ischemic attack who were likely to be candidates for carotid angiography and endarterectomy. We used logistic regression to determine if the patient's race was associated with receiving carotid angiography and endarterectomy, after adjusting for patient's age, degree of eligibility for Veterans Affairs care, socioeconomic status, comorbidities associated with hospital admission, and geographic region of the hospital. RESULTS: Of the 35 922 veterans in the cohort, 3535 (9.8%) underwent angiography during the study period and 1249 (3.5%) had carotid endarterectomy. Blacks constituted 18.2% of the patients with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, 9.8% of the patients having angiography, but only 4.2% of the patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Whites constituted 77.1% of the patients with a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, 86.1% of the patients receiving angiography, and 93.0% of those having carotid endarterectomies. After adjusting for confounding variables, black patients continued to have a significantly lower likelihood than white patients of undergoing angiography (risk ratio = 0.47; 95% confidence interval = 0.42, 0.53) and subsequent endarterectomy (risk ratio = 0.28; 95% confidence interval = 0.20, 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic status and access to care within a large managed health care system do not fully explain racial differences in the rate of carotid angiography and endarterectomy. Either referral bias for evaluation for carotid endarterectomy or racial differences in the extent and location of cerebrovascular disease are more important explanations for the observed racial variations.
Aged↗
Effect of awake Carotid Endarterectomy under local anaesthesia on peri-operative blood pressure: blood pressure is normalised when carotid stenosis is treated under local anaesthesia.
BACKGROUND: Carotid Endarterectomy can be performed under local, regional or general anaesthesia. One of the most important effects of the type of anaesthetic used is on the systemic blood pressure. Although variations in blood pressure during and following carotid endarterectomy have been studied previously, the effects of awake carotid endarterectomy under local anaesthesia on blood pressure and its comparison with similar procedures under similar types of anaesthesia have not. METHODS: Peri-operative blood pressure measurements were collected from the records of 25 consecutive patients for each of the following five procedures; Carotid Endarterectomy under general anaesthesia (CEAGA), Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion under general anaesthesia (ACDF), Cerebral Angiography under local anaesthesia (ANG), Carotid Endarterectomy patients under local anaesthesia who were symptomatic (CEALAS) and Carotid Endarterectomy patients under local anaesthesia who were asymptomatic (CEALAA). The recordings were then analysed to find out if there were any clinically significant variations in peri-operative blood pressure. FINDINGS: There is a significant and consistent difference when the pre-operative value was compared with the 4 hour and 24 hour post-operative recordings between the local and general anaesthetic groups for carotid endarterectomy. Carotid endarterectomy reduces the systolic and diastolic blood pressures post-operatively when performed under local anaesthesia and only the diastolic pressure was reduced when performed under general anaesthesia. CONCLUSION: The study provides evidence about the effect of carotid endarterectomy on the systemic blood pressure and its variations when performed under different types of anaesthesia. There is significant post-operative reduction in both the systolic and diastolic blood pressure values and the intraoperative fluctuation is minimal when local anaesthesia is used. Further studies are required to find out how this affects the long-term blood pressure and clinical outcome of the patient.
Anesthesia, General↗
Influence of coronary heart disease on morbidity and mortality after carotid endarterectomy: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota (1970-1988)
To evaluate the prognostic importance of coronary artery disease among patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, 177 residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota who underwent carotid endarterectomy during the period 1970 through 1988 were followed up to July 1, 1989. Patients were stratified as to the presence (n = 64) or absence (n = 93) of overt coronary artery disease or prior myocardial revascularization (n = 20) at the time of endarterectomy. At 30 days after carotid endarterectomy, there were no significant differences between patients with or without coronary artery disease in the occurrence of death, myocardial infarction or stroke. Kaplan-Meier estimate of 8-year relative survival after carotid endarterectomy (assessed as a percent of survival in age- carotid endarterectomy (assessed as a percent of survival in age- and gender-matched control subjects) was 89% in those without and 75% in those with overt coronary artery disease. Of the 59 total deaths, 29 (49%) had a cardiac cause and 4 (7%) were due to stroke (p less than 0.0001). The cumulative incidence of a cardiac event at 8 years after carotid endarterectomy was greater in those with than in those without overt coronary artery disease (61% vs. 25%, p less than 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, uncorrected coronary artery disease and diabetes were the only independent predictors of subsequent cardiac events, whereas age was the only independent predictor of death. These population-based data suggest that carotid endarterectomy can be safely undertaken in patients with stable coronary artery disease. In long-term follow-up of these patients, coronary rather than cerebral vascular disease is the most frequent cause of morbidity and mortality. Thus, these data lend strong support to the concept of early identification and management of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.
Cohort Studies↗
An institutional approach to maintenance of excellent outcomes for carotid endarterectomy in a setting with moderate-to-low procedure volume.
BACKGROUND: Institutions and surgeons with high procedure volumes have been reported to have lower morbidity and mortality rates for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Demonstrating comparable results is essential for centers with moderate or low volume. If comparable results cannot be demonstrated, a low- to moderate-volume center should not perform the procedure. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study of a program to achieve and sustain excellent outcomes after carotid endarterectomy was conducted at a single institution with low-to-moderate volumes. Results of this effort from January 1997 through December 2005 are reported. Key features of our approach include institutional control over which and how many surgeons can perform carotid endarterectomy. Surgeons must be experienced carotid surgeons and consistently perform more than 12 procedures annually and be continuously monitored. Surgical outcomes were independently audited through a mandated institutional carotid endarterectomy data registry. Surgeons with poor outcomes are barred from doing carotid endarterectomies; and annually updated outcomes data are posted on the Internet. RESULTS: This approach was used for 555 carotid endarterectomies in 503 patients. Our outcomes-with total death and disabling stroke rate of 1.6%-compare favorably with, and are not statistically different from, published benchmarks, despite volumes at our institution ranging from 44 to 81 patients annually and the participation of 8 surgeons during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should perform carotid endarterectomies only if excellent outcomes can be demonstrated. We conclude that by using an approach like ours, even institutions with moderate-to-low carotid endarterectomy volumes can achieve excellent outcomes. We propose that all institutions should assume responsibility for ensuring excellent carotid endarterectomy outcomes using a comprehensive outcomes-based approach with independent auditing similar to that presented here.
Aged↗