Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Dysbindin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Identification of snapin and three novel proteins (BLOS1, BLOS2, and BLOS3/reduced pigmentation) as subunits of biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex-1 (BLOC-1).

Biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex-1 (BLOC-1) is a ubiquitously expressed multisubunit protein complex required for the normal biogenesis of specialized organelles of the endosomal-lysosomal system, such as melanosomes and platelet dense granules. The complex is known to contain the coiled-coil-forming proteins, Pallidin, Muted, Cappuccino, and Dysbindin. The genes encoding these proteins are defective in inbred mouse strains that serve as models of Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome (HPS), a genetic disorder characterized by hypopigmentation and platelet storage pool deficiency. In addition, mutation of human Dysbindin causes HPS type 7. Here, we report the identification of another four subunits of the complex. One is Snapin, a coiled-coil-forming protein previously characterized as a binding partner of synaptosomal-associated proteins 25 and 23 and implicated in the regulation of membrane fusion events. The other three are previously uncharacterized proteins, which we named BLOC subunits 1, 2, and 3 (BLOS1, -2, and -3). Using specific antibodies to detect endogenous proteins from human and mouse cells, we found that Snapin, BLOS1, BLOS2, and BLOS3 co-immunoprecipitate, and co-fractionate upon size exclusion chromatography, with previously known BLOC-1 subunits. Furthermore, steady-state levels of the four proteins are significantly reduced in cells from pallid mice, which carry a mutation in Pallidin and display secondary loss of other BLOC-1 subunits. Yeast two-hybrid analyses suggest a network of binary interactions involving all of the previously known and newly identified subunits. Interestingly, the HPS mouse model strain, reduced pigmentation, carries a nonsense mutation in the gene encoding BLOS3. As judged from size exclusion chromatographic analyses, the reduced pigmentation mutation affects BLOC-1 assembly less severely than the pallid mutation. Mutations in the human genes encoding Snapin and the BLOS proteins could underlie novel forms of HPS.

Animals↗

Positive association of schizophrenia to JARID2 gene.

Dysbindin (DTNBP1) is a positional candidate gene for 6p22.3-linked schizophrenia (SZ). However, so far, no disease-causing alleles have been identified. DTNBP1 is immediately adjacent to JARID2, a member of the ARID (AT-rich interaction domain) family of transcription modulators. We have previously suggested that proteins which bind to AT-rich domains could play a role in SZ pathogenesis. Consequently, we explored the possibility that JARID2 itself could be a candidate gene for 6p22.3-linked SZ. We used a case control design to analyze single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertion/deletion variants affecting AT-rich domains in both the DTNBP1 and JARID2 genes. Three of the DTNBP1 SNPs analyzed had previously been shown to be associated with SZ. We did not detect any significant difference in allele, genotype or haplotype distribution for any of these DTNBP1 markers. However, we did detect a significant difference in allele distribution for a tetranucleotide repeat polymorphism in the JARID2 gene that affects an AT-rich domain. A significant increase in short alleles (less than 11 repeats) was found in patients with SZ (chi(2) = 7.02; P = 0.008). No other JARID2 marker displayed statistically significant allele and genotype distributions. Our findings suggest that JARID2 should be viewed as a candidate gene for 6p22.3-linked SZ.

Black or African American↗

[Advances in neurobiological understanding of schizophrenia. Perspectives for new therapeutic concepts].

Causal treatment options for schizophrenia are lacking due to our restricted knowledge of its etiology and pathogenesis. However, recently three postulated disposition genes for schizophrenia have been increasingly better confirmed: dysbindin, neuregulin-1, and G(72)/DAOA genes. These genes code proteins involved in processes ranging from brain development to the maintenance of glutamatergic transmission in the mature brain. Current interpretation of neuroanatomical findings points at reminiscences of disturbed brain development and a loss of nonneuronal elements, the so-called neuropil, as a correlate of brain atrophy. This reduction in neuropil is mainly caused by synaptic elements. Biochemical findings supporting this show that besides the dopaminergic and serotonergic system, glutamatergic transmission is also disturbed in schizophrenia. All these findings fit very well with the presumed functions of the disposition genes. Hypothesis-free approaches in structural brain imaging and the combination of functional imaging with relevant gene variants open new avenues for using markers from brain imaging to improve the diagnosis of schizophrenia and judge the response to neuroleptic treatment. Despite the enormous increase in knowledge for example in genetic research, the risk variants known until now provide no contribution to early diagnosis of schizophrenia. Furthermore, pharmacogenetics is currently unable to give a clear answer as to whether a single patient is responding to treatment or not.

Animals↗

Linkage and association studies of schizophrenia.

Recent twin studies confirm that schizophrenia is highly heritable, but attempts to locate and identify genes have proved to be difficult. This is largely because major genes appear to be rare or nonexistent. Instead, genetic liability almost certainly results from the combined effects of multiple susceptibility loci and most studies have been under-equipped to detect such effects. Nevertheless, several regions of the genome have been implicated by more than one linkage study and chromosome 22q has been implicated by linkage and by studies of patients with microdeletions. Recent work attempting to refine regions of interest using linkage dysequilibrium mapping has identified four promising and novel "positional candidates;" they are neuregulin-1 on chromosome 8p-p21, G72 located at chromosome 13q34, dysbindin at 6p22.3, and proline dehydrogenase, which is a gene that maps to chromosome 22q11. In addition, there is renewed interest in a fifth gene, catechol-O-methyltransferase, also on chromosome 22q11.

Carrier Proteins↗

The genes for schizophrenia: finally a breakthrough?

A number of susceptibility genes for schizophrenia have recently been identified. They have engendered excitement because replicate studies have attained greater consistency than in the past. In this review, we outline gene mapping methods, and briefly review their strengths and challenges. We also evaluate peer-reviewed genetic association studies that have implicated six selected genes: catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT), neuregulin 1 (NRG1), dysbindin (DTNBP1), regulator of G-protein signaling 4 (RGS4), and G72 and D-amino-acid oxidase (DAAO). The available supporting evidence is variable. Though credible evidence is available for all of these genes, it is strongest for NRG1 and DTNBP1. Further studies, particularly exhaustive analyses of all polymorphisms at each locus, meta-analyses, and investigations of the likely function of risk alleles (variants) are desirable.

Carrier Proteins↗

DTNBP1 genotype influences cognitive decline in schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: Intellectual decline is common in schizophrenia and predicts functional outcome. While many patients undergo intellectual decline that typically predates the onset of symptoms, few studies have investigated the underlying mechanism through which this occurs. The current study assessed the relationship between intellectual decline in schizophrenia and genetic variation in dysbindin-1 (DTNBP1). METHODS: We assessed cognitive decline in 183 Caucasian patients with schizophrenia using a proxy measure of premorbid IQ with which current general cognitive ability (g) was compared. We then tested for a relationship between the risk haplotype identified in previous work (CTCTAC) and intellectual decline. RESULTS: We found that carriers of the CTCTAC haplotype, demonstrated a significantly greater decline in IQ as compared with non-carriers (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that DTNBP1 influences the severity of intellectual decline in schizophrenia and may represent one underlying cause for heterogeneity in cognitive course.

Adult↗

Schizophrenia: genes at last?

Genetic epidemiological studies suggest that individual variation in susceptibility to schizophrenia is largely genetic, reflecting alleles of moderate to small effect in multiple genes. Molecular genetic studies have identified several potential regions of linkage and two associated chromosomal abnormalities, and evidence is accumulating in favour of several positional candidate genes. Currently, the positional candidate genes for which we consider the evidence to be strong are those encoding dysbindin (DTNBP1) and neuregulin 1 (NRG1). For other genes, disrupted in schizophrenia 1 (DISC1), D-amino-acid oxidase (DAO), D-amino-acid oxidase activator (DAOA, formerly known as G72) and regulator of G-protein signalling 4 (RGS4), the data are promising but not yet compelling. The identification of these, and other susceptibility genes, will open up new avenues for research aimed at understanding the pathogenesis of schizophrenia, and will catalyse a re-appraisal of the classification of psychiatric disorders.

Carrier Proteins↗

Schizophrenia genes, gene expression, and neuropathology: on the matter of their convergence.

This review critically summarizes the neuropathology and genetics of schizophrenia, the relationship between them, and speculates on their functional convergence. The morphological correlates of schizophrenia are subtle, and range from a slight reduction in brain size to localized alterations in the morphology and molecular composition of specific neuronal, synaptic, and glial populations in the hippocampus, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and dorsal thalamus. These findings have fostered the view of schizophrenia as a disorder of connectivity and of the synapse. Although attractive, such concepts are vague, and differentiating primary events from epiphenomena has been difficult. A way forward is provided by the recent identification of several putative susceptibility genes (including neuregulin, dysbindin, COMT, DISC1, RGS4, GRM3, and G72). We discuss the evidence for these and other genes, along with what is known of their expression profiles and biological roles in brain and how these may be altered in schizophrenia. The evidence for several of the genes is now strong. However, for none, with the likely exception of COMT, has a causative allele or the mechanism by which it predisposes to schizophrenia been identified. Nevertheless, we speculate that the genes may all converge functionally upon schizophrenia risk via an influence upon synaptic plasticity and the development and stabilization of cortical microcircuitry. NMDA receptor-mediated glutamate transmission may be especially implicated, though there are also direct and indirect links to dopamine and GABA signalling. Hence, there is a correspondence between the putative roles of the genes at the molecular and synaptic levels and the existing understanding of the disorder at the neural systems level. Characterization of a core molecular pathway and a 'genetic cytoarchitecture' would be a profound advance in understanding schizophrenia, and may have equally significant therapeutic implications.

Brain↗

Haplotypes at the dystrobrevin binding protein 1 (DTNBP1) gene locus mediate risk for schizophrenia through reduced DTNBP1 expression.

The DTNBP1 gene, encoding dysbindin, is now generally considered to be a susceptibility gene for schizophrenia. However, the confidence with which this hypothesis can be held has to be tempered by the poor reproducibility between studies in terms of the exact nature of the associated haplotypes, by the failure so far to identify any specific susceptibility variants and by the absence of any demonstrated function associated with any of the risk haplotypes. In the present study, we show that a defined schizophrenia risk haplotype tags one or more cis-acting variants that results in a relative reduction in DTNBP1 mRNA expression in human cerebral cortex. Subsidiary analyses suggest that risk haplotypes identified in other sample groups of white European ancestry also index lower DTNBP1 expression, whereas putative 'protective' haplotypes index high DTNBP1 expression. Our data indicate that variation in the DTNBP1 gene confers susceptibility to schizophrenia through reduced expression, and that this, therefore, represents a primary aetiological mechanism in the disorder.

Adult↗

Genetic variation in DTNBP1 influences general cognitive ability.

Human intelligence is a trait that is known to be significantly influenced by genetic factors, and recent linkage data provide positional evidence to suggest that a region on chromosome 6p, previously associated with schizophrenia, may be linked to variation in intelligence. The gene for dysbindin-1 (DTNBP1) is located at 6p and has also been implicated in schizophrenia, a neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by cognitive dysfunction. We report an association between DTNBP1 genotype and general cognitive ability (g) in two independent cohorts, including 213 patients with schizophrenia or schizo-affective disorder and 126 healthy volunteers. These data suggest that DTNBP1 genetic variation influences human intelligence.

Adult↗

Genes for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder? Implications for psychiatric nosology.

It has been conventional for psychiatric research, including the search for predisposing genes, to proceed under the assumption that schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are separate disease entities with different underlying etiologies. These represent Emil Kraepelin's traditional dichotomous classification of the so-called "functional" psychoses and form the basis of modern diagnostic practice. However, findings emerging from many fields of psychiatric research do not fit well with this model. In particular, the pattern of findings emerging from genetic studies shows increasing evidence for an overlap in genetic susceptibility across the traditional classification categories-including association findings at DAOA(G72), DTNBP1 (dysbindin), COMT, BDNF, DISC1, and NRG1. The emerging evidence suggests the possibility of relatively specific relationships between genotype and psychopathology. For example, DISC1 and NRG1 may confer susceptibility to a form of illness with mixed features of schizophrenia and mania. The elucidation of genotype-phenotype relationships is at an early stage, but current findings highlight the need to consider alternative approaches to classification and conceptualization for psychiatric research rather than continuing to rely heavily on the traditional Kraepelinian dichotomy. As psychosis susceptibility genes are identified and characterized over the next few years, this will have a major impact on our understanding of disease pathophysiology and will lead to changes in classification and the clinical practice of psychiatry.

Bipolar Disorder↗

An update on the genetics of schizophrenia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper reviews recent molecular genetic studies of schizophrenia and evaluates claims implicating specific genes as susceptibility loci. RECENT FINDINGS: Molecular genetic studies have identified several potential regions of linkage and two associated chromosomal abnormalities, and the evidence is accumulating in favour of several positional candidate genes. Currently, the strongest evidence for putative schizophrenia susceptibility loci relates to the genes encoding dysbindin (DTNBP1) and neuregulin (NRG1). For other genes, disrupted in schizophrenia (DISC1), D-amino acid oxidase activator (DAOA), regulator of G-protein signalling 4 (RGS4) and V-AKT murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 (AKT1) the data are promising but not yet compelling. In the most convincing cases, the risk haplotypes appear to be associated with small effect sizes and do not fully explain the linkage findings that prompted each study. SUMMARY: The ability of positional genetics to implicate novel genes and pathways will open up new vistas for neurobiological research. Despite the accumulation of significant genetic data, however, the susceptibility variants have yet to be identified and detailed follow-up studies are now required.

Alleles↗

Association study of the dystrobrevin-binding gene with schizophrenia in Australian and Indian samples.

Numerous studies have reported association between variants in the dystrobrevin binding protein 1 (dysbindin) gene (DTNBP1) and schizophrenia. However, the pattern of results is complex and to date, no specific risk marker or haplotype has been consistently identified. The number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) tested in these studies has ranged from 5 to 20. We attempted to replicate previous findings by testing 16 SNPs in samples of 41 Australian pedigrees, 194 Australian cases and 180 controls, and 197 Indian pedigrees. No globally significant evidence for association was observed in any sample, despite power calculations indicating sufficient power to replicate several previous findings. Possible explanations for our results include sample differences in background linkage disequilibrium and/or risk allele effect size, the presence of multiple risk alleles upon different haplotypes, or the presence of a single risk allele upon multiple haplotypes. Some previous associations may also represent false positives. Examination of Caucasian HapMap phase II genotype data spanning the DTNBP1 region indicates upwards of 40 SNPs are required to satisfactorily assess all nonredundant variation within DTNBP1 and its potential regulatory regions for association with schizophrenia. More comprehensive studies in multiple samples will be required to determine whether specific DTNBP1 variants function as risk factors for schizophrenia.

Alleles↗

Clinical impact of recently detected susceptibility genes for schizophrenia.

After years of frustration, the search for genes impacting on schizophrenia is now undergoing some exciting developments. Several proposals of susceptibility genes have been able to be supported by replications. Thus, there are now at least three very strong candidates: the gene for dysbindin (DTNBP1), the gene for neuregulin-1 (NRG1), and a less well-understood gene locus, G72/G30, which are likely to influence manifestations of schizophrenia. Other "hot" candidates such as the disrupted-in-schizophrenia 1 gene (DISC1) and the gene coding for protein kinase B (AKT1) might also prove to be susceptibility genes in the next future. The clinical implications of these findings are not yet fully visible. However, some first insights are possible: most of the genetic findings lack diagnostic specificity, and are also reproduced in bipolar disorder. Strong associations are also obtained on a symptomatic level, not only on a diagnostic level. The pathophysiological role of these hot candidate genes is currently under intensive study.

Animals↗

Bayesian trio models for association in the presence of genotyping errors.

Errors in genotyping can greatly affect family-based association studies. If a mendelian inconsistency is detected, the family is usually removed from the analysis. This reduces power, and may introduce bias. In addition, a large proportion of genotyping errors remain undetected, and these also reduce power. We present a Bayesian framework for performing association studies with SNP data on samples of trios consisting of parents with an affected offspring, while allowing for the presence of both detectable and undetectable genotyping errors. This framework also allows for the inclusion of missing genotypes. Associations between the SNP and disease were modelled in terms of the genotypic relative risks. The performances of the analysis methods were investigated under a variety of models for disease association and genotype error, looking at both power to detect association and precision of genotypic relative risk estimates. As expected, power to detect association decreased as genotyping error probability increased. Importantly, however, analyses allowing for genotyping error had similar power to standard analyses when applied to data without genotyping error. Furthermore, allowing for genotyping error yielded relative risk estimates that were approximately unbiased, together with 95% credible intervals giving approximately correct coverage. The methods were also applied to a real dataset: a sample of schizophrenia cases and their parents genotyped at SNPs in the dysbindin gene. The analysis methods presented here require no prior information on the genotyping error probabilities, and may be fitted in WinBUGS.

Alleles↗

Schizophrenia as an inflammation-mediated dysbalance of glutamatergic neurotransmission.

This overview tries to bridge the gap between psychoneuroimmunological findings and recent results from pharmacological, neurochemical and genetic studies in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is a disorder of dopaminergic neurotransmission, but modulation of the dopaminergic system by glutamatergic neurotransmission seems to play a key role. This view is supported by genetic findings of the neuregulin- and dysbindin genes, which have functional impact on the glutamatergic system. Glutamatergic hypofunction, however, is mediated by the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonism. The only endogenous NMDA receptor antagonist identified up to now is kynurenic acid (KYNA). Despite the NMDA receptor antagonism, KYNA also blocks, in lower doses, the nicotinergic acetycholine receptor, i.e., increased KYNA levels can explain psychotic symptoms and cognitive deterioration. KYNA levels are described to be higher in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and in critical central nervous system (CNS) regions of schizophrenics as compared to controls. Another line of evidence suggests that a (prenatal) infection is involved in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Due to an early sensitization process of the immune system or to a (chronic) infection, which is not cleared through the immune response, an immune imbalance between the type-1 and the type-2 immune responses takes place in schizophrenia. The type-1 response is partially inhibited, while the type-2 response is over-activated. This immune constellation is associated with inhibition of the enzyme indoleamine dioxygenase (IDO), because IDO - located in astrocytes and microglial cells - is inhibited by type-2 cytokines. IDO catalyzes the first step in tryptophan metabolism, the degradation from tryptophan to kynurenine, as does tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO). Due to the inhibition of IDO, tryptophan-kynurenine is predominantly metabolized by TDO, which is located in astrocytes, not in microglial or other CNS cells. In schizophrenia, astrocytes in particular are activated, as increased levels of S100B appear. Additionally, they do not have the enzymatic equipment for the normal metabolism-route of tryptophan. Due to the lack of kynurenine hydroxylase (KYN-OHase) in astrocytes, KYNA accumulates in the CNS, while the metabolic pathway in microglial cells is blocked. Accordingly, an increase of TDO activity has been observed in critical CNS regions of schizophrenics. These mechanisms result in an accumulation of KYNA in critical CNS regions. Thus, the immune-mediated glutamatergic-dopaminergic dysregulation may lead to the clinical symptoms of schizophrenia. Therapeutic consequences, e.g., the use of anti-inflammatory cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, which can also decrease KYNA directly, are discussed.

Animals↗

[In search of susceptibility genes for schizophrenia].

After the recent discovery and replication of several schizophrenia candidate regions on multiple chromosomes, susceptibility genes for schizophrenia could be identified for the first time. Each of these discoveries resulted from association studies within chromosomal regions first identified by linkage analyses. Within the last two years, the susceptibility genes Neuregulin1, Dysbindin, D-amino-acid-oxidase (DAAO) and G72 were discovered, which, in the variant forms, reduce glutamatergic activity in brain. Therefore, they are related to the so-called "Glutamate-hypothesis", which postulates a hypofunction of the glutamatergic system. Adults with VCFS (velo-cardio-facial-syndrome), where a deletion on chromosome 22q11 can be found, show a very high incidence of schizophrenia. In addition, 2% of patients with schizophrenia exhibit this 22q11-deletion. Within the VCFS-deleted region on chromosome 22q11, the genes coding for proline dehydrogenase (PRODH) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) were also found to be significantly associated with schizophrenia. Proline is a pre-stage of glutamate, and in addition, it seems to be a neuromodulator of glutamatergic transmission in the brain. COMT is one of the two enzymes degrading catecholamines such as dopamine. Therefore, it plays a large role in the cortical dopamine metabolism. Furthermore, an association of schizophrenia with the gene RGS4 (regulator-of-G-protein-signaling-4), a modulator of the function of multiple G-protein-linked neurotransmitter receptors, was identified. Gene-expression-analyses of postmortem cerebral cortex (prefrontal) indicate that the transcription of RGS4 is diminished within schizophrenics. In accordance with the fact that schizophrenia is a disease with a multifactorial etiology, it should be emphasized that the described biological risk factors can increase susceptibility, but that none of them can cause the disease alone.

Abnormalities, Multiple↗

Genomic approaches to schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Genetic epidemiologic studies suggest that individual variation in susceptibility to schizophrenia is substantially genetic. However, like other common disorders, the mode of transmission is complex and probably reflects oligogenic inheritance against a polygenic background. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this article was to introduce genomics as an approach to understanding the causes of schizophrenia. CONCLUSIONS: Genomic approaches to schizophrenia are becoming increasingly feasible as data from the Human Genome Project accumulate and technology improves. Attempts to identify genes for schizophrenia have been based on 4 main approaches: genetic linkage studies, studies of chromosomal abnormalities associated with the disorder, association studies, and convergent genomics. Several strong linkages have been found, and there is emerging consensus regarding at least some of the chromosomal regions likely to contain schizophrenia genes. However, moving from linked region to susceptibility gene is still difficult, given our poor understanding of the pathophysiology and population genetics, and the complexity of the phenotype. Despite this difficulty, positional candidate genes have been identified, and in 2 instances-neuregulin 1 and dysbindin-1-support has come from several studies. The rates of schizophrenia seen in individuals with deletions of chromosome 22q11, as well as linkage data,suggest that this chromosomal region might contain a susceptibility locus.

Chromosome Aberrations↗