Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Disease modifying”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Predicting the potential public health impact of disease-modifying HIV vaccines in South Africa: the problem of subtypes.

Current HIV vaccines in development appear unlikely to prevent infection, but could provide benefits by increasing survival; such vaccines are described as disease-modifying vaccines. We review the current status of vaccines and modeling vaccines. We also predict the impact that disease-modifying vaccines could have in South Africa, where multiple subtypes are co-circulating. We model transmissibility/fitness differences among subtypes. We used uncertainty analyses to model vaccines with four characteristics: (i) take, (ii) duration of immunity, (iii) reduction in transmissibility/fitness, and (iv) increase in survival. We reconstructed, and forecasted, the South African epidemic from 1940 to 2140 (assuming no vaccination). We predict that: (i) incidence will peak in 2014, decline, and stabilize, (ii) prevalence will continue to rise, and (iii) the AIDS death rate curve will peak in 2022. Our predictions show that (over the next 135 years) the epidemic in South Africa will switch from a predominantly Subtype C epidemic to an epidemic driven by other subtypes. We predict that the epidemic could remain unchanged, even with mass vaccination with a vaccine that is equally effective against all co-circulating subtypes. However, if the non-C subtypes are less (or equally) transmissible as Subtype C then disease-modifying vaccines could result in eradication. Thus, in countries where multiple-subtypes are co-circulating it is critical to realize that small biological differences among subtypes will have dramatic consequences for the effectiveness of HIV vaccination campaigns. A slight difference in fitness will determine whether a disease-modifying vaccine has almost no impact on the epidemic or can achieve eradication.

AIDS Vaccines↗

Could disease-modifying HIV vaccines cause population-level perversity?

Most current candidate HIV vaccines seem to produce little protection against infection, but reduce viral load and slow the decline in CD4 lymphocyte numbers. Such disease-modifying vaccines could potentially provide important population-level benefits by reducing transmission, but could possibly also increase transmission. We address the following question: could disease-modifying HIV vaccines cause population-level perversity (ie, increase epidemic severity)? By analysing a mathematical model and defining a new quantity-the fitness ratio-we show that disease-modifying vaccines that provide only a low degree of protection against infection and/or generate high fitness ratios will have a high probability of making the epidemic worse. However, we show that if disease-modifying vaccines cause a 1.5 log(10) reduction in viral load (or greater) then perversity cannot occur (assuming risk behaviour does not increase). Finally, we determine threshold surfaces for risk behaviour change that determine the boundary between beneficial and perverse outcomes; the threshold surfaces are determined by the fitness ratio, the proportion of the population that are "successfully vaccinated", and the degree of change of risk behaviour in unvaccinated infected individuals. We discuss the implications of our results for designing optimal vaccination control strategies.

AIDS Vaccines↗

The effect of 3435C>T MDR1 gene polymorphism on rheumatoid arthritis treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a multifactorial disease, with immunological, genetical as well as environmental factors being implicated in its pathogenesis. Treatment of RA is based mainly on drugs modulating the course of the disease, e.g. methotrexate (MTX) or sulfasalazine (SL). The MDR1 gene product, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), is probably one of the most important and best defined transporters for drug delivery in humans. P-gp transports a wide range of substrates with diverse chemical structures, among them anticancer agents, cardiac drugs, and immunosuppressants. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of the 3435C>T MDR1 gene polymorphism on the efficacy of RA treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, i.e. MTX plus methylprednisolone (MP), and SL. METHODS: The study was carried out on 255 patients with RA treated according to two regimes: (1) MTX (7.5-15.0 mg weekly) plus low doses of MP (n=174), (2) SL (1.5-3 g daily, n=81). RESULTS: The probability of remission of RA symptoms after MTX plus MP therapy was 4.65-fold higher in carriers of the TT genotype compared to patients with CC genotype (P=0.003, OR 4.65, 95%CI 1.66-13.05), whereas the probability of remission of RA symptoms in patients treated with SL was 2-fold higher in carriers of TT genotype compared to patients with CC genotype, but did not reach statistical significance (P=0.358, OR=2.00 95% CI=0.58-6.87). CONCLUSION: The results from the present study suggest that the 3435C>T MDR1 gene polymorphism may influence the efficacy of RA therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

How can one develop disease-modifying drugs in osteoarthritis?

A disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug should be able to interfere with the cartilage breakdown observed in this disease. The current question is whether development of a drug should be focused on structural parameters (eg, radiologic joint space width, magnetic resonance imaging cartilage volume, and so on), on clinical parameters such as functional impairment, or on a composite index such as the capacity of the study drug to prevent and/or to retard the requirement for total articular replacement. Another aspect of osteoarthritis trials is that several recent advances have greatly facilitated the conduct of phase I and II studies, such as biological markers of cartilage metabolism and magnetic resonance imaging parameters of cartilage breakdown.

Antirheumatic Agents↗

Paucity of radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis treated with methotrexate as the first disease modifying antirheumatic drug.

OBJECTIVE: To determine disease progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using methotrexate (MTX) as the first disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). METHODS: Patients with RA treated with MTX as their first DMARD and in whom hand/wrist radiographs prior to MTX administration had been obtained and who had received MTX for at least 10 months were evaluated radiographically for disease progression. Coded radiographs were read for erosions by 2 experienced readers using the modified method of Sharp. Erosion scores and rate of progression (per month) were calculated. RESULTS: Of 24 patients studied, baseline radiographs showed erosions (one or more) in 11 and none in 13. Patients with and without erosions at baseline had comparable demographic and clinical features, although patients with erosions had longer disease duration and higher rheumatoid factor positivity than those without erosions (statistically nonsignificant, however). Half of all patients showed no progression; 73% of those patients with erosions at baseline but only 31% of those without erosions at baseline progressed (p = 0.049); progression rates were 0.017 (+/-0.033) and 0.049 (+/-0.078) for the 2 groups (p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Patients with RA starting MTX before erosions have occurred are less likely to develop them; these patients also experienced a lesser degree of disease progression than patients who started MTX with erosions already present.

Antirheumatic Agents↗

Survival analysis of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in Spanish rheumatoid arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the duration of treatment and the reasons for discontinuing therapy with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in Spanish rheumatoid arthritis patients. METHODS: An observational study was made of 629 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs between 1979 and 1991. The outcomes (treatment termination because of toxicity and lack of response) of 991 treatment starts with intramuscular gold salts, D-penicillamine, azathioprine, and methotrexate were subjected to survival analysis. Cumulative probability of continuation of each drug (drug survival) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and comparison between the survival curve of each was made by log rank testing. RESULTS: Median drug survival (95% confidence interval) was 51 (25-76.9) months for methotrexate, 39.9 (19.9-48.2) months for azathioprine, 34.9 (29.4-41.4) months for gold salts, and 16.4 (13.9-21) months for D-penicillamine. The highest cumulative probability of drug survival at five years was for methotrexate (45%); that at 10 years was for gold salts (15%). Up to 60% of the patients discontinued D-penicillamine in the first two years. Lack of response was the major limiting factor for all drugs except D-penicillamine, for which it was toxicity. D-Penicillamine was associated with a greater rate of discontinuations because of toxicity in women and patients older than 65. Previous disease modifying antirheumatic drug administration did not influence current drug survival. CONCLUSION: Overall, gold salts remain useful for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis over long periods of time in the population studied. Because of the high rate of continuation of treatment (survival) and the optimal efficacy and toxicity profiles observed with methotrexate after five years of treatment, it should be the drug of first choice for second line treatment of these RA patients.

Aged↗

Preclinical and clinical challenges in the development of disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease.

The neurodegenerative disease first described almost 100 years ago by Alois Alzheimer is predicted to be one of the major health problems of the 21st century. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive dementia characterized by global cognitive decline and is defined pathologically by amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Major unmet medical need has encouraged pharmaceutical companies to invest in AD drug development. Promising novel approaches are under way, assisted by recent advances in animal models and an increased understanding of pathophysiology. However, demonstration of disease modification and identification of at-risk individuals are among the significant challenges facing those working in AD drug development.

Journal Article↗

M1 muscarinic agonists as potential disease-modifying agents in Alzheimer's disease. Rationale and perspectives.

A cholinergic hypofunction in Alzheimer's disease (AD) may lead to formation of beta-amyloids that might impair the coupling of M1 muscarinic ACh receptors (mAChRs) with G proteins. This disruption in coupling can lead to decreased signal transduction, to a reduction in levels of trophic amyloid precursor proteins (APPs), and to generation of more beta-amyloids that can also suppress ACh synthesis and release, aggravating further the cholinergic deficiency. These "vicious cycles," a presynaptic and a postsynaptic one, may be inhibited, in principle, by M1 selective agonists. Such properties can be detected in the functionally selective M1 agonists from the AF series [e.g., project drugs, AF102B, AF150(S)]. These M1 agonists promote the nonamyloidogenic APP processing pathways and decrease tau protein phosphorylation. The effects on tau proteins suggest a link between M1 mAChR-mediated signal transduction system(s) and the neuronal cytoskeleton via regulation of phosphorylation of tau microtubule-associated protein. This may indicate a dual role for M1 agonists: as inhibitors of two "vicious cycles," one induced by beta-amyloids, and the other due to overactivation of certain kinases (e.g., glycogen synthase kinase-3, GSK-3) or downregulation of phosphatases, respectively. Prolonged administration of AF150(S) in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice restored cognitive impairments, cholinergic hypofunction, and tau hyperphosphorylation, and unveiled a high-affinity binding site to M1 mAChRs. Except M1 agonists, there are no reports of compounds having such combined effects, for example, amelioration of cognition dysfunction and beneficial modulation of APPs together with tau phosphorylation. This unique property of M1 agonists to alter different aspects of AD pathogenesis could represent the most remarkable, yet unexplored, clinical value of such compounds.

Alzheimer Disease↗

Protease inhibitors as potential disease-modifying therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease.

The current lack of an effective treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has fuelled an intense search for novel therapies for this neurodegenerative condition. Aberrant production or decreased clearance of amyloid-beta peptides is widely accepted to be causative for AD. Amyloid-beta peptides are produced by sequential processing of the beta-amyloid precursor protein by the two aspartyl-type proteases beta-secretase and gamma-secretase. Because proteases are generally classified as druggable, these secretases are a centre of attraction for various drug discovery efforts. Although a large number of specific drug-like gamma-secretase inhibitors have been discovered, progress towards the clinic has been slowed by the broad substrate specificity of this unusual intramembrane-cleaving enzyme. In particular, the Notch receptor depends on gamma-secretase for its signalling function and, thus, gamma-secretase inhibition produces distinct phenotypes related to a disturbance of this pathway in preclinical animal models. The main task now is to define the therapeutic window in man between desired central efficacy and Notch-related side effects. In contrast, most studies with knockout animals have indicated that beta-secretase inhibition may have minimal adverse effects; however, the properties of the active site of this enzyme make it difficult to find small-molecule inhibitors that bind with high affinity. In most instances, inhibitors are large and peptidic in nature and, therefore, unsuitable as drug candidates. Thus, there are many issues associated with the development of protease inhibitors for AD that must be addressed before they can be used to test the 'amyloid cascade hypothesis' in the clinic. The outcomes of such trials will provide new directions to the scientific community and hopefully new treatment options for AD patients.

Alzheimer Disease↗

[Leflunomide--a new disease modifying anti-rheumatic agent].

BACKGROUND: Leflunomide is a novel disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The agent has been developed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, but its multiple immunomodulatory properties may in the future be of interest in the treatment of other rheumatic and immunological diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Review of the literature in order to present the current relevant clinical documentation of the drug. RESULTS: The clinical documentation is mainly based on three large, prospective, randomized trials of six months "to two years" duration comparing leflunomide with placebo, sulphasalazine or methotrexate. The efficacy of leflunomide in all trials was superior to placebo and comparable to sulphasalazine and methotrexate. The frequency of adverse events was also comparable to the comparators. INTERPRETATION: Leflunomide is a safe and efficacious addition to the roster of antirheumatic drugs, but further clinical trials and experience from clinical practice are needed in the evaluation of its place as a disease-modifying agent.

Antirheumatic Agents↗

Practical results of treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatoid drugs.

Reappraisal of disease-modifying antirheumatoid drug (DMARD) therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has raised the possibility that the risks of treatment outweigh the benefits. To provide more information a retrospective survey of the case-notes of 325 patients with RA was performed. The case-notes were randomly selected from the 2320 RA patients indexed in one department. Improvement was defined by the contemporary written notes of the managing physician. Analysis employed the life-table technique. A total of 247 case-notes could be adequately analysed: 154 patients had received one or more DMARDs constituting 251 drug-patient exposures. Improvement followed drug-patient exposure in 57% of cases after a delay of between one and seven months. Nine per cent occurred within one month and 22% within two months. Of those patients withdrawn from treatment after less than two months, the 'early withdrawal' group, 25% subsequently improved without further DMARD therapy. The probability of still receiving a specific DMARD 8 months, 24 months and 36 months after the start of treatment was 50%, 25% and 10%, respectively. The majority of withdrawals resulted from adverse reactions. There was no evidence for a relationship between patient responses to sequential DMARDs.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗

Large-scale AI analysis reveals missed opportunities in albuminuria testing and disease-modifying therapy implementation.

AIMS: Albuminuria is a key diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of chronic kidney disease (CKD), associated with adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Despite guideline recommendations, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) testing is infrequently performed in cardiology. This study assessed the uptake of UACR testing, the estimated prevalence of undiagnosed albuminuria, and the use of disease-modifying therapies in patients with cardio-kidney-metabolic (CKM) disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adults seen at the cardiology department of a tertiary referral centre between 2019 and 2024. Data were extracted using CTcue, an AI-driven platform. Albuminuria was defined as UACR &#x2265;30 mg/g. A weighted logistic regression model estimated albuminuria prevalence in untested patients. Among 77 351 patients (44.8% female, mean age 64.4 years), only 8.9% had a recorded UACR, of whom 46.4% had albuminuria. Testing rates were low across high-risk groups: 29.9% in diabetes, 21.7% in heart failure, and 13.7% in hypertension. In untested patients, the predicted prevalence of albuminuria was 36.6%, and highest in those with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2 (70.0%), heart failure (47.8%), or diabetes (46.8%). Use of disease-modifying therapies was low, even among patients with confirmed albuminuria. In patients with documented vs. predicted albuminuria, 43.0% vs. 39.1% received renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, 12.8% vs. 5.7% received SGLT2 inhibitors, and <1% in both groups received finerenone. CONCLUSION: Albuminuria is substantially underdetected in cardiology practice, possibly contributing to underuse of effective CKM therapies. Systematic UACR screening with structured treatment protocols may help close this gap and improve outcomes for patients with CKM disease.

Humans↗

Safety and efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic agents in rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

The definition of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has changed dramatically over the last decade. Current expectations of efficacy now include amelioration of signs and symptoms of disease activity as well as slowing, if not complete cessation, of disease progression as evidenced by Xray progression and significant improvement of patient function. Rheumatologists assess the safety profile of these agents more critically in an attempt to increase the risk:benefit profile. Traditional agents, such as methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine and leflunomide have provided patients with substantial relief of symptoms and some decrease of X-ray progression but have been hampered by the frequent occurrence of significant adverse events (AEs) and inability to maintain benefit for a prolonged period of time. With the increased understanding of the basic mechanism of the disease process, there has been the introduction of four biological disease-modifying agents introduced into clinical practice which have substantially increased the risk:benefit ratio for patients with various rheumatic diseases.

Antirheumatic Agents↗

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are associated with a reduced risk for cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a case control study.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by inflammation and an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study investigates possible associations between CVD and the use of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in RA. Using a case control design, 613 RA patients (5,649 patient-years) were studied, 72 with CVD and 541 without CVD. Data on RA, CVD and drug treatment were evaluated from time of RA diagnosis up to the first cardiovascular event or the end of the follow-up period. The dataset was categorized according to DMARD use: sulfasalazine (SSZ), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or methotrexate (MTX). Odds ratios (ORs) for CVD, corrected for age, gender, smoking and RA duration, were calculated per DMARD group. Patients who never used SSZ, HCQ or MTX were used as a reference group. MTX treatment was associated with a significant CVD risk reduction, with ORs (95% CI): 'MTX only', 0.16 (0.04 to 0.66); 'MTX and SSZ ever', 0.20 (0.08 to 0.51); and 'MTX, SSZ and HCQ ever', 0.20 (0.08 to 0.54). The risk reductions remained significant after additional correction for the presence of rheumatoid factor and erosions. After correction for hypertension, diabetes and hypercholesterolemia, 'MTX or SSZ ever' and 'MTX, SSZ and HCQ ever' showed significant CVD risk reduction. Rheumatoid factor positivity and erosions both increased CVD risk, with ORs of 2.04 (1.02 to 4.07) and 2.36 (0.92 to 6.08), respectively. MTX and, to a lesser extent, SSZ were associated with significantly lower CVD risk compared to RA patients who never used SSZ, HCQ or MTX. We hypothesize that DMARD use, in particular MTX use, results in powerful suppression of inflammation, thereby reducing the development of atherosclerosis and subsequently clinically overt CVD.

Aged↗

Disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis: strategies for optimizing management.

BACKGROUND: The objective for this article is to highlight several challenges faced by patients and providers in the utilization of disease-modifying agent (DMA) therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS) and to offer practical management strategies that can effectively mitigate or even prevent limiting adverse reactions and enhance treatment compliance. REVIEW SUMMARY: Our discussion will be limited to the use of interferon beta1a (Avonex, Rebif), interferon beta1b (Betaseron), and glatiramer acetate (Copoxane) as these are the primary agents used in the United States for primary disease-modifying therapy in relapsing forms of MS. Some of the recommendations contained herein are derived from evidence-based studies, while others are contingent upon our collective clinical experiences. At the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas and Texas Neurology in Dallas we actively follow approximately 5000 MS patients. The majority of our patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) are treated with one of the currently available DMAs. Our experience with these patients, and the challenges they face in continuing long-term treatment, constitutes the basis of our proposed treatment strategies. As part of this effort we formulated an assessment and intervention instrument that can be used in the clinic and by telephone to enhance compliance and minimize adverse events. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive treatment approach to the utilization of disease-modifying therapy in MS can serve to optimize the management of our patients and effectively meet the challenges that arise during the course of treatment.

Journal Article↗