Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Delayed Graft Function”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Delayed graft function. Influence on outcome and strategies for prevention.

Delayed graft function remains a prevalent problem in cadaveric renal transplantation that increases rejection, decreases graft and patient survival, increases the cost of transplantation, and complicates patient management. Although current medical and surgical strategies can reduce the incidence of DGF to 20% or less, newer therapies that focus on nonimmune and immune forms of renal injury are needed to improve outcomes further.

Graft Rejection↗
PubMed1991

Fixed-rate reimbursement fails to cover costs for patients with delayed graft function.

Medicare uses a fixed reimbursement schedule to pay the initial hospital costs for renal transplantation. This creates the potential to underpay for patients who develop the common complication of delayed graft function. We undertook a pilot study to determine if delayed graft function resulted in higher hospital charges and thus a loss in revenue when caring for these patients. Of 34 patients who experienced delayed graft function between October 12, 1987 and July 7, 1989, 9 (group 1) were randomly selected for study. During this same period 136 patients had immediate graft function; from them, another 9 (group 2) were selected by matching age, sex, and date of transplantation. The average (+/- SD) hospital stays for groups 1 and 2 were 17 +/- 8 and 10 +/- 2 days, respectively (p less than 0.001). The average time on dialysis for group 1 was 10.3 +/- 6.3 days (range 2-22 days). All dollars values were adjusted to a 1989 level, and we excluded kidney acquisition costs and professional fees. The average per patient charges for group 1 were $41,474 +/- 15,211 (range $21,926-$66,311), compared with $23,774 +/- 3245 (range $19,317-$29,702) for group 2 (p less than 0.001). We adjusted the charge values to estimate actual costs by using our hospital's average cost:charge ratio of 0.90 for 1987 and 1988, and 0.85 for 1989; the group 1 and group 2 average patient costs were $37,157 +/- 13,836 and $21,397 +/- 2921, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Fees and Charges↗
PubMed2001

A calcineurin antagonist-free induction strategy for immunosuppression in cadaveric kidney transplant recipients at risk for delayed graft function.

BACKGROUND: Avoidance of calcineurin antagonists for a prolonged period de novo after cadaver donor renal transplantation may facilitate recovery from delayed graft function. The present study examined the benefit of prolonging the calcineurin antagonist-free interval by administering sirolimus (SRL) in combination with chimeric (c-) anti-interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) monoclonal antibodies (mAb). METHODS: Three contemporaneous but nonrandomized cohorts were compared for acute rejection episodes, patient and graft survival rates, renal function, and adverse reaction profiles for 12 months. Patients with delayed graft function were treated with either SRL/c-IL-2R mAb/prednisone (Pred) with inception of cyclosporine (CsA) once the serum creatinine value was < or =2.5 mg/dl (n=43; group 1) or anti-lymphocyte preparations/Pred/delayed CsA for 7 to 14 days (n=18; group 3). A third cohort displayed immediate function and was treated de novo with CsA/c-IL-2R mAb/Pred (n=21; group 2). RESULTS: The incidence of acute rejection episodes was significantly lower among group 1 (16%) compared with groups 2 (52%, P=0.004) or 3 (39%, P=0.05). Among the seven rejection episodes in group 1, six of seven occurred among African-American or retransplant recipients, and a separate cluster of six of seven occurred among patients who displayed SRL trough concentrations < or =9 ng/ml. Furthermore, additional antilymphocyte antibody treatment was required to reverse either steroid-resistant or Banff grades II or III acute rejection episodes among 14%, 55% (P=0.08), and 71% (P=0.03) of patients in each group, respectively. Patient and graft survival rates, as well as mean serum creatinine values, were similar at 12 months among the three groups. However, group 1 patients displayed higher serum cholesterol and triglyceride values, as well as lower hemoglobin, platelet, and leukocyte values compared with the other two groups. CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that a SRL/c-IL-2R mAb/Pred induction regimen provides excellent acute rejection prophylaxis.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2006

Impact of early or delayed cyclosporine on delayed graft function in renal transplant recipients: a randomized, multicenter study.

The benefit of delayed cyclosporine in reducing risk of delayed graft function (DGF) is not clearly established. This study compared early vs. delayed cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME) inde novorenal transplant patients. Patients were randomized to early (day 0, n=97) or delayed (day 6, n=100) CsA-ME at an initial dose of 8 mg/kg/day with dose adjusted according to C2 level. All patients received enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS), steroids and an anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody. In both groups, 33% of patients were at high risk of DGF; 26 patients (26.8%) in the early CsA-ME group and 23 patients (23.0%) in the delayed CsA-ME group experienced DGF (n.s.). Renal function at 3 months was comparable (creatinine clearance 51.1 mL/min with early CsA-ME and 53.8 mL/min with delayed CsA-ME), and remained similar to 12 months. Treatment failure, defined as biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss or death, did not differ significantly at 12 months (23.7% with early CsA-ME vs. 29.0% with delayed CsA-ME). Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 15.5% of early CsA-ME and 26.5% of delayed CsA-ME patients (n.s.). Both regimens were well tolerated. These data suggest that early or delayed introduction of CsA-ME results in similar renal function in renal transplant patients regardless of DGF risk level.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Delayed graft function: a frequent but still unsolved problem in renal transplantation].

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a frequent and well-known complication of renal transplantation, which occurs in 30% of cadaver kidney allografts. It has an economic cost that is the result of prolonged patient hospitalization and the need for hemodialysis sessions; it also increases the risk of acute allograft rejection and may affect long-term graft survival. Lots of risk factors were identified, like donor hemodynamic compromise or prolonged cold ischemia time; however, incidence of DGF remains high due to the frequent use of marginal donors due to organ shortage. Recent advances in the pathophysiology of DGF point the importance of the ischemia-reperfusion injury mechanisms and some therapeutics that may reduce them are under investigation, like the use of new solutions to improve organ preservation and the use of some antioxidant and anti-inflammatory drugs.

Cadaver↗
PubMed1996

Delayed graft function in the absence of rejection has no long-term impact. A study of cadaver kidney recipients with good graft function at 1 year after transplantation.

We previously reported that delayed graft function (DGF) in the absence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (Rej) had no effect on outcome of primary cadaver kidney transplantation (TX). By contrast, DGF in combination with Rej strongly predicted poor long-term graft survival. We asked whether this poor long-term outcome was due to early graft loss associated with DGF, or to an ongoing process leading to late graft loss. To answer this question, we studied a subset of 298 cadaver kidney transplant recipients who had not suffered early graft loss and had a serum creatinine level < or = 2.0 mg/dl at 1 year after TX. The incidence of DGF (defined by dialysis during the first week after TX) in this subset was 19%. DGF was associated with cold ischemia time >24 hr (P = 0.0003) and Rej (P = 0.06). For grafts with versus without DGF, the incidence of late acute Rej (>1 year after TX) was similar. Actuarial graft survival was similar for Rej-free recipients with versus without DGF (P = 0.9) and was worse for those with Rej and no DGF (P < 0.02). Importantly, however, in our recipients who all had a serum creatinine level < or = 2.0 mg/dl at 1 year after TX, the worst long-term outcome was noted in the subgroup with both DGF and Rej (P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, DGF was also only a risk factor in combination with Rej (P = 0.002, relative risk = 3.7), while a 0-antigen HLA mismatch had no impact. Patient survival decreased for recipients with both DGF and Rej by univariate (P = 0.009) and multivariate (P = 0.02, relative risk = 2.9) analyses. We conclude that DGF without Rej has no impact on long-term survival. However, our data for recipients with both DGF and Rej suggest that a chronic ongoing process leads to late graft failure. Further research is necessary to identify the exact pathophysiology of this process, which appears to be, at least in part, HLA antigen independent.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Delayed graft function and cast nephropathy associated with tacrolimus plus rapamycin use.

Delayed graft function (DGF) occurs in 15 to 25% (range, 10 to 62%) of cadaveric kidney transplant recipients and up to 9% of living donor recipients. In addition to donor, recipient, and procedural factors, the choice of immunosuppression may influence the development of DGF. The impact of immunosuppression on DGF was studied. The frequency of DGF was evaluated in first cadaveric or living donor kidney allograft recipients (n = 144) transplanted at the University of Washington from November 1999 through September 1, 2001. Donor, recipient, and procedural factors, as well as biopsy results, were compared between patients who developed DGF and those who did not. DGF was more common in patients treated with rapamycin than without (25% versus 8.9%, P = 0.02) and positively correlated with rapamycin dose (P = 0.008). In those developing DGF, the duration of posttransplant dialysis increased with donor age (P = 0.003) but decreased with mycophenolate mofetil use (P = 0.01). All biopsies during episodes of DGF demonstrated changes of acute tubular injury. Of the patients with tubular injury, 12 treated with rapamycin and tacrolimus developed intratubular cast formation indistinguishable from myeloma cast nephropathy. Histologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural studies indicated that these casts were composed at least in part of degenerating renal tubular epithelial cells. These findings suggest that rapamycin therapy exerts increased toxicity on tubular epithelial cells and/or retards healing, leading to an increased incidence of DGF. Additionally, rapamycin treatment combined with a calcineurin inhibitor may lead to extensive tubular cell injury and death and a unique form of cast nephropathy.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Hypertension is an independent predictor of delayed graft function and worse renal function only in kidneys with chronic pathological lesions.

BACKGROUND: Delayed graft function (DGF) has been identified as one of the principal correlates of poor graft survival in cadaveric renal transplantation. However, its risk factors and clinical predictors have been poorly elucidated. METHODS: We analyzed the risk factors of DGF with a specific emphasis on the role of histological damage of donor kidney. Then, we also studied the impact of DGF, and donor factors affecting DGF, on kidney graft function over the first year after engraftment in 100 consecutive cadaveric renal transplant (Tx) recipients. RESULTS: The organs displaying DGF (n=48) had a significantly higher degree of glomerular sclerosis and tubular atrophy (P<0.01), as well as of interstitial fibrosis and vascular damage (P<0.02) in time-zero biopsies. In patients who received an "ideal" organ for Tx (total histological score < or = 4), DGF showed a strong relationship with Deltaage D-R (70% increase of risk for donors 10 years older than recipients), and with the histological score (odds ratio 1.34). In contrast, donor hypertension was the most relevant variable independently associated with DGF (odds ratio 19.4) in patients receiving a suboptimal organ (histological score >4). Moreover, DGF and donor hypertension adversely affected graft function at 1 year, but only in Tx patients with a histological score >4 in time-zero biopsy. Of note, both patients with and those without DGF showed a very low incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (8.5 and 6.8%, respectively) and a rather short cold ischemia time (<16 hr). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the quality of the transplanted organ and the occurrence of DGF are strictly related to each other and can influence graft function through apparently nonimmune mechanisms. In addition, long-standing donor hypertension is a strong independent variable affecting both DGF and graft function of suboptimal cadaveric kidneys, at least up to 1 year.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Increased levels of GALbeta1-4GLCNACalpha2-6 sialyltransferase pretransplant predict delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Galbeta1-4GlcNAcalpha2-6 sialyltransferase (ST6GalI) is an acute phase reactant whose release from cells can be induced by proinflammatory cytokines. Because patients with chronic renal failure have high circulating levels of proinflammatory cytokines, we hypothesized that patients on the renal transplant waiting list would have high circulating levels of ST6GalI, which might adversely affect post-transplant events. METHODS: Levels of ST6GalI were measured in the serum of 70 patients immediately before renal transplant; these were correlated with posttransplant events, such as delayed graft function and rejection. RESULTS: The mean serum level of ST6GalI was significantly higher in the patients (3162+/-97 U) than in 19 controls (2569 +/- 125 U; P<0.003). Patients who required dialysis posttransplant for treatment of delayed graft function (n=20) had significantly higher levels of ST6GalI pretransplant (3735+/-228 U) than patients (n=50) who did not require dialysis (2933+/-83 U; P<0.0001). In a multivariate analysis the ST6GalI level and cold ischemic time were found to be independent risk factors for the development of delayed graft function. CONCLUSIONS: ST6GalI levels are high in renal failure patients awaiting a renal transplant and may be a risk factor for the development of delayed graft function. The assessment and perhaps modulation of a potential transplant recipient's ST6GalI systemic level may be beneficial.

Cryopreservation↗
PubMed1998

Delayed graft function after renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: There is a strong association between delayed graft function (DGF) and reduced graft survival (GS) of cadaveric renal transplants. This study was performed to identify donor characteristics that might predict adverse outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed the folders of 509 consecutive organ donors for 586 renal transplant recipients receiving grafts between 1990 and 1995. A uniform immunosuppression protocol was employed. RESULTS: The factors that did not alter the rate of DGF were procurement year, local versus shared organs, donor gender, race, hypotension, serum creatinine level and trend, blood transfusions, and vasopressor use and dose. The factors that did alter the frequency of DGF were cause of death (P=0.0053), donor age (P=0.0017), cold ischemic time (P=0.0009), anastomotic time (P=0.0012), combined cold ischemic time and anastomotic time (P=0.00018), and body mass index (P=0.009). All of the factors with the exception of body mass index were of comparable import when analyzed by multiple logistic regression. One-year GS of patients without DGF was 93.2%, and the GS of those with DGF was 76.6% (P < 0.0001). However, none of the donor factors correlated with 1-year GS. Seventy-seven donors were the source of paired transplants performed by our program. Sixty percent were concordant for immediate function, 32% were discordant for DGF with equal numbers affecting the first or second graft, and in only 8% did DGF affect both grafts. CONCLUSIONS: Donor factors associated with DGF were increased ischemia, donor age, and cause of death. Although there is a close association between DGF and reduced GS, there is no association between these donor factors and GS. This seeming paradox suggests that unknown variables contribute heavily to early graft outcome.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Insulin-like growth factor-I attenuates delayed graft function in a canine renal autotransplantation model.

BACKGROUND: Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) has been shown to accelerate recovery in animal models of ischemic or toxic acute renal injury. Ischemic renal injury is frequently encountered after cadaveric transplantation manifested as delayed graft function. This study was performed to determine whether perfusion of kidneys with preservation solution supplemented with IGF-I would improve the course of renal injury in a canine autotransplantation model of delayed graft function. METHODS: Dogs underwent unilateral nephrectomy with kidneys perfused and stored in Euro-Collins solution supplemented with vehicle (n = 11) or IGF-I (n = 8). After 24 hours of kidney preservation, a contralateral nephrectomy was performed and the stored kidney was autotransplanted. Renal function was examined for 5 days after the transplantation, and an inulin clearance was obtained at the time of death. RESULTS: Compared with dogs that received kidneys preserved in the vehicle, dogs receiving the IGF-I preserved kidneys had significantly lower daily serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels during the course of 5 days after transplantation. Inulin clearance at death was nearly double in the IGF-I treated animals compared with the vehicle-treated controls (1.37 +/- 0.16 ml/min/kg versus 0.77 +/- 0.13 ml/min/kg; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Perfusion and storage of kidneys with preservation solution supplemented with IGF-I can attenuate the course of delayed graft function in a canine renal autotransplantation model. IGF-I may have potential for use in cadaveric human renal transplantation.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody sequential immunosuppressive induction therapy in renal transplants with high risk of delayed graft function.

There is little experience on the use of monoclonal antibodies that block the high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor (basiliximab and daclizumab) in sequential therapy in renal transplants with risk of delayed graft function. This study sougth to test the efficacy and safety of the substitution of anticalcineurins with two doses of basiliximab or daclizumab in the immediate posttransplant period for recipients at risk of delayed renal graft function. Immunosuppression consisted of steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and two doses of basiliximab (20 mg/day) on days 0 and 4 posttransplant or daclizumab (1 mg/kg per day) on days 0 and 15 posttransplant. Anticalcineurins were not administered until the beginning of graft function. Among 49 recipients (mean age 63.5 +/- 10.5 years), 40 received a kidney from a donor over 60 years of age, three from a non-heart-beating donor, and six from donors with an acute elevation of serum creatinine to 2.4 +/- 0.86 (1.7-3.7). At a mean follow-up of 14.2 +/- 8.4 months, five patients experienced acute rejection episodes. Only 15 patients needed posttransplant dialysis (2.7 +/- 1.6). In 11 patients, cyclosporine (CsA) was introduced at 6 +/- 2.9 days posttransplant and in 37, tacrolimus on 8.6 +/- 3.6 days posttransplant. The incidence of kidney graft loss was 16.3%. Patient survival was 96%. Thirty-nine recipients are alive with functioning grafts, with mean serum creatinine of 1.4 mg/dL. In conclusion, substitution for anticalcineurins with interleukin-2-receptor blockade in the immediate posttransplant period for patients at risk of delayed graft function minimizes nephrotoxicity and reduces tubular necrosis, without increasing the risk of an acute rejection episode.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Delayed graft function influences renal function, but not survival.

BACKGROUND: In renal transplantation, the impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on prognosis is controversial. We analyzed the risk factors of DGF and its impact on graft function and prognosis. METHODS: Seven hundred thirty-four cadaveric renal transplants performed between 1983 and 1997 were analyzed. DGF was diagnosed when serum creatinine levels increased, remained unchanged, or decreased less than 10% per day in three consecutive days in the first week after transplantation. Creatinine clearances of more or less than 50 or 30 mL/min at one year were used as cut-off points for optimal and suboptimal graft function, respectively. The logistic regression model was used to identify independent risk factor related to DGF and renal function one year after transplantation. The Cox regression model was used to examine the influence of DGF on long-term graft survival. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed the following risk factors for DGF: recipient pretransplantation mean arterial blood pressure of less than 100 mm Hg (OR = 2.08, 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.03), female donor to male recipient combination (OR = 1.55, 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.35), donor age of more than 50 years (OR = 2.21, 95% CI, 1.49 to 3.26), cold ischemia time of more than 28 hours (OR = 1.78, 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.63), and peak panel reactive antibodies of more than 50% (OR = 1.7, 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.55). The incidence of DGF was one of the independent risk factors for suboptimal graft function at one year (OR = 1.68, 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.48), together with donor age of more than 50 years (OR = 2.39, 95% CI, 1.61 to 3.57), female donor gender (OR = 1.99, 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.78), the occurrence of acute rejection episodes (OR = 2.66, 95% CI, 1.87 to 3.78), peak panel-reactive antibodies of more than 50% (OR = 1.67, 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.47), and sharing of 1 to 3 versus 4 to 8 cross-reactive antigens groups (OR = 1.65, 95% CI, 1.09 to 2. 49). Moreover, DGF was one of the two independent risk factors for acute rejection episodes, but it had no independent effect on graft survival. CONCLUSION: Several risk factors for DGF were identified, of which a low recipient pretransplant mean arterial blood pressure, the transplantation of kidneys from female donors to male recipients, and a prolonged cold ischemia time are potentially avoidable. Although DGF is one of the several risk factors of acute rejection and suboptimal function at one year, it is not independently associated with an increased rate of graft loss.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of the effects of ischemic injury and ureteral obstruction on delayed graft function in cats after renal autotransplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative importance of ischemic injury to delayed graft function (DGF) in cats. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. ANIMALS: Six intact female cats. METHODS: Cats had renal autograft transplantation without ureteral transection and reimplantation and a contralateral nephrectomy. Serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentrations were measured regularly and abdominal ultrasound was performed before surgery, the day after surgery and twice weekly thereafter. Ultrasound-guided renal biopsy was performed on day 7. Cats were euthanatized on day 21. Histology of the autograft, ureter, bladder, vascular anastomoses sites, and contralateral kidney were performed. Observations were compared with those from an historic group of research cats that had extravesicular ureteroneocystostomy and contralateral nephrectomy. RESULTS: Five cats completed the study. Serum creatinine and BUN concentrations increased after surgery, peaking at 3.2+/-0.8 and 77.6+/-15.9 mg/dL, respectively, 1-2 days after surgery. Serum creatinine concentration returned to the reference interval by 6 days after surgery. BUN gradually decreased in all cats but did not return to the reference interval by study end. Serum creatinine and BUN concentrations were consistently lower but not significantly so (P=.29 and .56, respectively) compared with the historic ureteroneocystostomy group. No ultrasonographic abnormalities or renal biopsy histologic abnormalities were observed. At necropsy, 1 autograft had generalized interstitial fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Harvesting the renal graft and the ischemia before revascularization causes impaired renal function after engraftment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The process of harvesting and reimplanting the renal graft can contribute to DGF in cats, independent of ureteral obstruction.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Similar impact of slow and delayed graft function on renal allograft outcome and function.

Kidney transplant patients can be divided into three groups, according to the initial graft function. First-week dialyzed patients form the delayed graft function (DGF) group. Nondialyzed patients are divided into slow graft function (SGF) or immediate graft function (IGF) according to whether the day 5 serum creatinine was higher versus lower than 3 mg/dL, respectively. SGF patients showed worse graft survival, above higher incidence of acute rejection and lower renal function than IGF patients, although few reports have analyzed outcomes in these groups. We analyzed the impact of SGF on graft survival, first-year renal function, and incidence of acute rejection in 291 renal transplant patients. Creatinine was significantly worse at 12 months for SGF and DGF than for IGF patients (1.9 +/- 0.8 mg/dL, 1.8 +/- 0.7 mg/dL, 1.5 +/- 0.5 mg/dL, respectively; P < .05). There was no difference in first-year renal function between SGF and DGF. The acute rejection rate was higher among the SGF than the IGF group (45% vs 21%, P < .05), but not different from DGF patients (42%, P < .05). Graft survival was better among IGF than SGF or DGF patients, with no significant difference between the last two groups (3-year graft survival, 82%, 71%, 70%, respectively; log-rank test, P < .05). Kidney transplant recipients who develop SGF have a worse outcome than patients with IGF, similar to DGF patients. SGF patients show worse graft survival, worse renal function, and higher acute rejection rates than IGF patients, despite not needing dialysis.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of thymoglobulin in graft survival and function 1 year after kidney transplantation using deceased donors.

UNLABELLED: This study evaluated 1-year graft function and survival among kidney transplantations from deceased donors using thymoglobulin (Thymo) as an induction strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven percent of patients were men and overall mean age was 42 +/- 15 years. Cold ischemia time was 20.1 +/- 4.8 hours. The primary outcome was defined as survival not censored for death after 1 year. The secondary outcome was defined as a comparison of function and survival among patients who received more or less then six doses of Thymo. RESULTS: Four patients experienced acute rejection episodes and the other three died during follow-up. One-year graft survival was 91% with a mean serum creatinine of 1.28 +/- 0.43 mg/dL. Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 56%. Forty-two (64%) patients displayed acute tubular necrosis of mean duration of 6.89 +/- 7.48 days. Patients who received lower doses showed better serum creatinine values 3 months (1.45 vs 1.86 mg/dL, P = .013) and 12 months (1.05 vs 1.50 mg/dL, P = .04). The difference was probably due to acute tubular necrosis that produced a RR of 1.7 (P = .02; CI 1.04-2.97) when compared with patients with Scr values above 1.30 mg/dL. When censored for death, graft survival was not different between the two groups (< or =6 doses 93% vs >6 doses 97%, P = .43). CONCLUSION: Immunologic induction with Thymo produced excellent graft survival after 1 year with preservation of graft function. Delayed graft function was the most important determinant of graft function after 1 year.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2003

Delayed graft function may not adversely affect short-term renal allograft outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Delayed graft function (DGF) is commonly believed to adversely impact both short- and long-term renal allograft function. Because immunosuppressive therapy is commonly altered after DGF is identified, retrospective analyses are difficult to interpret. We therefore prospectively sought to examine the natural history of DGF in a controlled patient population under identical immunosuppressive protocols. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing cadaveric renal transplantation were treated with sequential triple drug immunotherapy. High-dose steroids were administered in the operating room and rapidly tapered to 20 mg prednisone by post-operative day (POD) 6. Cyclosporine (CsA) microemulsion was begun on POD 1, and dosed asymmetrically at 12-h intervals to reach a daytime Cav of 650 ng/mL (utilizing 2-h and 6-h levels), while PM doses were adjusted to an AM trough of 300 ng/mL. Mycophenolate (1000 mg q12 h) was added on POD 3 in most patients and discontinued after 3 months. No induction agents were used. All patients were followed for at least 6 months. RESULTS: Sixty consecutive patients received 64 allografts (four double grafts). In all, 17 patients required dialysis and were considered to have DGF. Eight of these patients received marginal organs turned down by at least one other centre. Cold ischaemia time was significantly longer in patients with DGF (24 h vs. 19 h, P < 0.01) All patients were treated as planned and there were no major protocol violations. One patient had primary non-function and was excluded from analysis. CsA trough and Cav values were similar between groups. Mean serum creatinine levels (mg/mL) fell more slowly in patients with DGF but there was no significant difference by 3 months (1.7 vs. 1.5) and the creatinine clearance was not significantly different between the groups after 1 year (71 cm3/min in DGF vs. 61 cm3/min, P = 0.13). Our data demonstrate that alterations in routine immunosuppressive strategies may not be necessary to achieve equivalent outcomes in patients with DGF.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

[Sequential protocols with thymoglobuline and delayed introduction of calcineurin: effects on renal function in renal transplant recipients with non immunological risk and low risk of delayed graft function].

Induction therapy with thymoglobuline significantly decreases the risk of acute rejection, particularly in high immunological risk patients, in combined transplantations and in pediatric renal transplantation. After the introduction of cyclosporin in the 1980's and the recognition of its potential nephrotoxicity, induction therapy with delayed introduction of cyclosporin (sequential protocols) have became very popular in many transplant centers and are now used even in low-immunological risk patients. The aim of the present study was to assess the recovery of renal function in low-immunological risk patients receiving a sequential protocol versus those receiving a calcineurin inhibitor at day 1. Among patients receiving their first transplant in our center between January 1999 and June 2000, we selected 72 recipients with no immunological risk and no risk of delayed graft function (DGF). 35 patients (group I) have received a sequential protocol whereas 37 patients (group II) have received a calcineurin inhibitor (Neoral or prograf) at day 1. We analysed creatinine reduction ratio, 24-hour creatinine excretion on post-transplant day 2, and serum creatinine and creatinine clearance at day 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 post-transplant. There was no difference between groups concerning demographic, immunological or surgical parameters. The percentage of patients with immediate graft function was similar between the two groups (10 versus 9). The number of patients requiring dialysis in the first post-transplant week was also similar (8/35 versus 6/37). The day serum creatinine reached 200 micromol/l was 15 +/- 11 versus 14 +/- 12 in groups I and II respectively. Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance were similar at all time intervals. CMV disease was significantly higher in the group 1 (42% versus 18.5%; p < 0.005). Our data suggest that in patients with low immunological risk and low-risk of DGF, introduction of calcineurin inhibitors as early as the post-transplant day 1 is not deleterious for renal function recovery. These data should be confirmed by a prospective randomised trial.

Adult↗