SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Decanoates”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed1976

Release and elimination of 14C-fluphenazine enanthate and decanoate esters administered in sesame oil to dogs.

The rates of release of 14C-fluphenazine enanthate and 14C-fluphenazine decanoate were compared in two groups of five male dogs. Each dog was given a single dose (2 mg/kg im) of either the enanthate or decanoate ester in sesame oil. The times required to attain maximum concentrations of radioactivity in plasma were 3.8 +/- 0.5 days (+/-SE) for the enanthate ester and 10.6 +/- 1.1 days for the decanoate ester (p less than 0.001); maximum concentrations of radioactivity in the plasma at these times were 16.7 +/- 1.1 and 11.1 +/- 1.2 ng/ml, respectively (p less than 0.01). However, 35 days after dosing, the concentrations of radioactivity in plasma were greater for the decanoate ester than for the enanthate ester. The times required for 50% of the dose to be excreted in the urine and feces were 7.8 +/- 0.5 days for the enanthate ester and 22.6 +/- 4.4 days for the decanoate ester (p less than 0.05). The total amounts excreted in 35 days were 85.4 +/- 1.8 and 68.8 +/- 6.6% of the dose for the enanthate and decanoate esters, respectively; the average half-times for the rates of release of radioactivity from depot and body, as calculated from the data for total excretion, were 5.55 days for the enanthate ester and 15.4 days for the decanoate ester. Thirty-five days after dosing, the amount of the dose present in the injection site was 4.6 +/- 1.6% for the enanthate ester and 18.6 +/- 5.7% for the decanoate ester. Two groups of six dogs each were protected against the emetic effects of apomorphine more than twice as long by the decanoate ester than by the enanthate ester after the subcutaneous administration of single 8-mg/kg doses of either drug in sesame oil (p less than 0.05). Based on measurements of total radioactivity, it was concluded that the decanoate ester was released from the depot at less than one-half the rate of the enanthate ester.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Preclinical evaluation of GBR12909 decanoate as a long-acting medication for methamphetamine dependence.

Methamphetamine (METH) abuse is a growing health problem, and no treatments for METH dependence have been identified. The powerful addictive properties of METH are mediated by release of dopamine (DA) from nerve terminals in mesolimbic reward pathways. METH stimulates DA release by acting as a substrate for DA transporter (DAT) proteins, thereby triggering efflux of DA from cells into the synapse. We have shown that blocking DAT activity with high-affinity DA uptake inhibitors, like GBR12909, can substantially reduce METH-evoked DA release in vitro, suggesting GBR12909 may have potential as a pharmacotherapy for METH dependence. The purpose of the present study was to examine the neurobiological effects of a long-acting oil-soluble preparation of GBR12909 (1-[2-[bis(4-fluorophenyl)methoxy]ethyl]-4-(3-hydroxy-3-phenylpropyl) piperazinyl decanoate, or GBR-decanoate). Male rats received GBR-decanoate (480 mg/kg, i.m.) or its oil vehicle, and were tested using a variety of methods one and two weeks later. Ex vivo autoradiography showed that GBR-decanoate decreases DAT binding in DA-rich brain regions. In vivo microdialysis in the nucleus accumbens revealed that GBR-decanoate elevates baseline levels of extracellular DA and antagonizes the ability of METH to evoke DA release. The dopaminergic effects of GBR-decanoate were sustained, lasting for at least two weeks. Rats pretreated with GBR-decanoate displayed enhanced locomotor responses to novelty at one week, but not two weeks, postinjection. Administration of the D(2)/D(3) receptor agonist quinpirole (10 and 100 microg/kg, s.c.) decreased locomotor activity and suppressed plasma prolactin levels; quinpirole-induced responses were not altered by GBR-decanoate. Thus, GBR-decanoate is able to elevate basal synaptic DA levels and block METH-evoked DA release in a persistent manner, without significant perturbation of DA receptor function. The findings suggest that GBR-decanoate, or similar long-acting agents, should be evaluated further as potential treatment adjuncts in the management of METH addiction in humans.

Amphetamine-Related Disorders↗

PubMed2000

Zuclopenthixol decanoate for schizophrenia and other serious mental illnesses.

BACKGROUND: There is a clear link between stopping antipsychotic medications and a relapse of psychotic symptoms. A series of long-acting intra-muscular preparations has been developed since the 1960s in the hope of reducing the frequency of relapse and, hence, overall disability. These depot preparations, active for weeks at a time, are frequently used for those who find taking oral medication on a regular basis difficult or unacceptable. It has, however, been a consistent concern that any reduction in relapse rate afforded by depot preparations may be offset by an increase in adverse effects such as drug-induced movement disorders. OBJECTIVES: To compare zuclopenthixol decanoate to oral zuclopenthixol and other antipsychotic preparations for the treatment of schizophrenia and similar serious mental illness. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1982-1998), CINAHL (1982-1998), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1998), The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (April 1998), EMBASE (1980-1998), MEDLINE (1966-1998), and PsycLIT (1974-1998) were searched. References of all eligible studies were searched for further trials. The manufacturer of zuclopenthixol was contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Inclusion criteria were that the clinical study should be randomised, focus on people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness with psychotic symptoms, and compare the use of zuclopenthixol decanoate to oral zuclopenthixol or other antipsychotic preparations. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data was extracted independently by two reviewers (EC, MF). Authors of trials were contacted for additional and missing data. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of homogenous dichotomous data were calculated with the Peto method. Where possible the number needed to treat (NNT) and its 95% confidence interval was also calculated. MAIN RESULTS: Four studies relating to zuclopenthixol decanoate were included. All compared zuclopenthixol decanoate with other depot preparations. Zuclopenthixol decanoate prevented or postponed relapses when compared to other depots (NNT 8, CI 5-53). However, zuclopenthixol decanoate may induce more adverse effects (NNH 5, CI 3-31) although it decreases need for anticholinergic medication when compared to a group of other depot preparations (NNT 9, CI 5-38). For the risk of leaving the study early, there was also a trend for benefit to those allocated to zuclopenthixol decanoate. None of the studies reported outcomes on service utilisation, costs, or quality of life. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Choice of which depot to use must always take into account clinical judgement and the preferences of the recipients of care and their carers. Limited trial data suggests, however, that there are real differences between zuclopenthixol decanoate and other depots and these differences largely favour the former. This review highlights the need for good controlled clinical trials to fully address the effects of zuclopenthixol decanoate for those with schizophrenia. Future studies should report service utilisation data, as well as satisfaction with care and economic outcomes. Duration of such trials should be of a longer duration than the included studies (12 months or more).

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2006

The depot of buprenorphine decanoate produced a dose-related long-lasting antinociceptive effect in guinea pigs.

BACKGROUND: A long-acting analgesic may be particularly desirable in patients suffering from long-lasting pain. The aim of the study was to evaluate the antinociceptive effect of a novel depot of buprenorphine decanoate and its metabolic profiles in human and animal blood. METHODS: Following their intramuscular injections in guinea pigs, the antinociceptive effects of the novel depot of buprenorphine decanoate (in oil) and the traditional dosage form of buprenorphine HCl (in saline) were evaluated. An in vitro metabolic study of buprenorphine decanoate in human and animal blood was also carried out. The antinociception of drugs was evaluated using the plantar test. The blood concentrations of drugs were assayed using a high performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: We found that both the buprenorphine HCl (in saline) and buprenorphine decanoate (in oil) produced dose-related antinociceptive effect but of different duration of action. Under an equi-mole basis of 0.6 micromol/kg, the durations of action of buprenorphine HCl and decanoate were 4 and 72 h, respectively. In in vitro metabolic study in human and animal bloods, buprenorphine decanoate was totally converted to buprenorphine. Buprenorphine decanoate is a prodrug of buprenorphine. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular injection of the depot of buprenorphine decanoate in guinea pigs produced a dose-related long-lasting antinociceptive effect which was much longer than that of the traditional dosage form of buprenorphine HCl. Moreover, buprenorphine decanoate is a prodrug of buprenorphine.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

PubMed1993

Effects of nandrolone decanoate on bone mass in established osteoporosis.

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 46 postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis in order to assess the long-term effects of nandrolone decanoate on the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar vertebrae and of the distal third of the radius and on the biochemical markers of bone turnover. The patients received intramuscular injections of placebo or 50 mg nandrolone decanoate every 3 weeks for 18 months. Thirty-two of the initial 46 patients completed 1 year of study and 25 completed the whole study period of 18 months. Overall, vertebral BMD increased by 2.9% in the nandrolone decanoate group and fell by 2.3% in the placebo group. Radial BMD showed a slight but transient improvement, with a subsequent return to basal levels in the nandrolone decanoate group, whereas there was a progressive decrease in the placebo group. Patients treated with nandrolone decanoate also complained less of bone pain. Urinary hydroxyproline decreased significantly in treated patients, whereas osteocalcin tended to increase, but the change was not significant. HDL cholesterol concentrations decreased only slightly and haemoglobin increased significantly in the nandrolone decanoate group. Two patients treated with nandrolone decanoate withdrew from the study because of hirsutism and hoarseness. The results indicate that nandrolone decanoate exerts positive effects on vertebral BMD and on bone pain in patients with established postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗

PubMed1997

Sensitive method for the simultaneous measurement of fluphenazine decanoate and fluphenazine in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with coulometric detection.

A highly sensitive and specific high-performance liquid chromatographic method with coulometric detection was developed for the simultaneous assay of fluphenazine decanoate and fluphenazine in plasma. The extraction and sample clean-up procedures are simple, rapid to execute, yet yield chromatograms relatively free of any interference from endogenous plasma constituents, such that the extraordinary sensitivity of the coulometric detector can be exploited fully. This is the first analytical procedure for the simultaneous determination of fluphenazine decanoate and fluphenazine. The detection limits for both fluphenazine decanoate and fluphenazine were 0.1 ng/ml plasma and the limits of quantitation were 0.25 ng/ml plasma. Standard curves from 0.25 to 10 ng/ml were linear with coefficients of variation < 10%. The method was applied to measure plasma levels of fluphenazine decanoate and fluphenazine in patients under medication with 25-50 mg biweekly intramuscular (i.m.) injections of fluphenazine decanoate. It was possible to monitor the plasma levels of fluphenazine in all cases. Fluphenazine decanoate was present in measurable concentration in the plasma of 4 out of 5 patients who received biweekly i.m. injections of 50 mg fluphenazine decanoate. In a pilot experiment with a dog, the method was used to follow fluphenazine decanoate and fluphenazine plasma levels up to 13 days, at least, after i.m. single dose (10 mg/kg).

Animals↗

PubMed1986

A clinical trial comparing intramuscular haloperidol decanoate and oral haloperidol in chronic schizophrenic patients: efficacy, safety, and dosage equivalence.

Thirty patients with chronic schizophrenia received oral haloperidol and haloperidol decanoate in a two-phase open study. In the first phase, patients were stabilized on haloperidol tablets for 2 weeks, then maintained on a constant daily dose for 2 more weeks. They were then switched to haloperidol decanoate for the second phase. Patients were first stabilized on a monthly dose of haloperidol decanoate and then received this dose for 5 consecutive months. Haloperidol decanoate, administered in monthly injections at 9.4 to 15 times the daily oral dose, was at least as efficacious as oral haloperidol in controlling the symptoms of schizophrenia. There were no serious adverse reactions to either drug. Blood samples were taken from 22 patients during both the oral and the decanoate phases and analyzed for steady state haloperidol concentrations. These determinations demonstrate that the release of haloperidol with the decanoate form is sustained throughout the 4-week dosing interval. Lower plasma drug concentrations were observed during decanoate treatment than during oral treatment. Despite these lower plasma concentrations, patients remained stable on both drug regimens. This finding suggests that haloperidol decanoate injected every 4 weeks can provide control of psychotic symptoms at least as effectively as daily oral haloperidol.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1978

[Pharmacological studies of long-acting phenothiazines with particular reference to fluphenazine decanoate (author's transl)].

A long-term study was performed on the effects of fluphenazine decanoate and the results were compared with those of fluphenazine-2HCl and fluphenazine enanthate. These agents given orally were equipotent in inhibiting the motility of mice. With subcutaneous administration, decanoate and enanthate showed a clearly prolonged action, whereas fluphenazine-2HCl was effective for only 3 days. Decanoate and enanthate did not produce marked hypothermia in rats. Like enanthate, decanoate inhibited, for a long duration, apomorphine-induced stereotyped behavior and methamphetamine group toxicity in mice, as well as induced catalepsy in rats. It was found that fluphenazine-2HCl markedly inhibited certain agonists-induced contraction of isolated preparations while enanthate and decanoate inhibited these contractions almost equally. In rats, enanthate induced a persistent hypotension and marked changes in ECG while decanoate showed a transient hypotension and slight changes in ECG. In the study of rat brain catecholamine turnover, these three drugs significantly increased dopamine turnover, and decanoate and enanthate were found to have prolonged effects. No significant change in noradrenaline turnover was observed. These results indicate that fluphenazine decanoate has the same spectrum of activity as enanthate except for its slower onset, weaker potency and longer duration of action. A prolonged tranquilizing effect was most evident.

Animals↗

PubMed1983

A double-blind comparative trial of the decanoates of clopenthixol and fluphenazine in the treatment of chronic schizophrenic out-patients.

Forty-five patients were entered into a 24-week double-blind trial of clopenthixol decanoate and fluphenazine decanoate. The 24-week double-blind period was preceded by a 12-week open period. Of the 45 patients entered, 6 failed to attend the second interview and 1 left the country before the final assessment. Doses administered were in the range 100 mg 4-weekly to 400 mg 2-weekly for clopenthixol decanoate and 12.5 mg 4-weekly to 37.5 mg 3-weekly for fluphenazine decanoate. Both depot neuroleptics appeared to have an equivalent duration of action, with 200 mg clopenthixol decanoate approximately equivalent to 25 mg fluphenazine decanoate. Patients' mental state was assessed on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impression, Krawiecka, Goldberg and Vaughan Rating Scale, and unwanted effects were recorded on a checklist. No differences were detected between the two drugs with regard to therapeutic activity or side-effects. It is concluded that clopenthixol decanoate is as effective and as well-tolerated a depot neuroleptic as fluphenazine decanoate.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

PubMed1996

Alteration in membrane fluidity and lipid composition, and modulation of H(+)-ATPase activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae caused by decanoic acid.

Decanoic acid, a lipophilic agent, inhibited in vitro the plasma membrane H(+)-ATPase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown in YPD medium. Conversely, when decanoic acid (35 microM) was present in the growth medium, the measured H(+)-ATPase activity was four times higher than that of control cells. Km, and pH and orthovanadate sensitivity were the same for the two growth conditions, which indicated that H(+)-ATPase activation was not due to conformational changes in the enzyme. The activation process was not entirely reversible which showed that plasma membrane H(+)-ATPase activation is due to several mechanisms. 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene anisotropy performed on protoplasts from cells grown in YPD revealed that as decanoic acid concentration was increased, anisotropy significantly decreased, i.e. membrance fluidity increased. Cells grown in media containing decanoic acid exhibited greater membrane fluidity compared with control cells. Furthermore, these cells did not show any fluidifying effect when increased concentrations of decanoic acid were added. Chemical analysis of cell membrane lipid composition revealed a modification in the distribution of the phospholipid fatty acids and sterols in cells grown in the presence of 35 microM decanoic acid compared with control cells. Our results support the view that the plasma membrane H(+)-ATPase activation induced by decanoic acid is correlated with an alteration in membrane lipid constituents.

Cell Membrane↗

PubMed2000

Depot perphenazine decanoate and enanthate for schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Anti-psychotic drugs are usually given orally but compliance with medication given by this route may be difficult to quantify. The development of depot injections in the 1960s gave rise to extensive use of depots as a means of long-term maintenance treatment. Perphenazine decanoate and enanthate are depot antipsychotics that belong to the phenothiazine family and have a piperazine ethanol side chain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of depot perphenazine decanoate and enanthate versus placebo, oral anti-psychotics and other depot antipsychotic preparations for people with schizophrenia in terms of clinical, social and economic outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: Biological Abstracts (1982-1998), the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1998), the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (June 1998), EMBASE (1980-1998), MEDLINE (1966-1998), and PsycLIT (1974-1998) were searched. References of all identified trials were also inspected for more studies and industry contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials focusing on people with schizophrenia where depot perphenazine decanoate and enanthate, oral anti-psychotics or other depot preparations were compared. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were reliably selected, quality rated and data extracted. For dichotomous data Peto odds ratios (OR) with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Where possible, the number needed to treat statistic (NNT) was calculated. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. MAIN RESULTS: One study of six months duration, compared perphenazine enanthate to clopenthixol decanoate. There was no differences between the two for outcomes of global improvement, relapse and leaving the study early. More people in the perphenazine enanthate group required anticholinergic drugs than those allocated to clopenthixol decanoate (OR 3.6 CI 1.2-10, NNT 10). A single study (n=64, duration six weeks) compared perphenazine enanthate and its longer acting decanoate ester. Data on relapse and leaving the study early failed to show convincing differences. The enanthate group, however, experienced more movement disorders (OR 0.2 CI 0.06-0.7) than those allocated the decanoate ester of the same drug (NNT 4.0) and required more anticholinergic drugs (OR 0.2 CI 0.08-0.7, NNT 3.7). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Depot perphenazine is in clinical use in the Nordic countries, Belgium, Portugal and the Netherlands. At a conservative estimate a quarter of a million people suffer from schizophrenia in those countries and could be treated with depot perphenazine. The total number of participants in the two trials with useful data is 236. Neither study observes the effect of oral versus depot antipsychotic drugs. Until well conducted and reported randomised trials are undertaken clinicians will be in doubt as to the effects of perphenazine depots and people with schizophrenia should exercise their own judgement or ask to be randomised.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

PubMed2005

Depot perphenazine decanoate and enanthate for schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic drugs are usually given orally but compliance with medication given by this route may be difficult to quantify. The development of depot injections in the 1960s gave rise to extensive use of depots as a means of long-term maintenance treatment. Perphenazine decanoate and enanthate are depot antipsychotics that belong to the phenothiazine family and have a piperazine ethanol side chain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of depot perphenazine decanoate and enanthate versus placebo, oral antipsychotics and other depot antipsychotic preparations for people with schizophrenia in terms of clinical, social and economic outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We updated previous searches of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Register (June 1998), Biological Abstracts (1982-1998), the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1998), EMBASE (1980-1998), MEDLINE (1966-1998), and PsycLIT (1974-1998) by searching the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Register (March 2004). References of all identified trials were also inspected for more studies and industry contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: We compared randomised clinical trials focusing on people with schizophrenia where depot perphenazine decanoate and enanthate, oral antipsychotics or other depot preparations. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We reliably selected studies, quality rated them and extracted data. For dichotomous data we estimated the Relative Risk (RR) with the 95% confidence intervals (CI). Where possible, we calculated the number needed to treat statistic (NNT). Analysis was by intention-to-treat. MAIN RESULTS: Only four studies (Ahlfors 1980, Eufe 1979, Knudsen 1985c, Tegeler 1979), randomising a total 313 people could be included in this review and this combined with an overall lack of usable data limits any interpretation of results. Perphenazine enanthate was not significantly any better or worse than other depot antipsychotics in most of the main outcomes such as global state, relapse or leaving the study early. We found some differences favouring the control groups for adverse effects. One study (Ahlfors 1980) of six months' duration (n=172), compared perphenazine enanthate to clopenthixol decanoate. There were no differences between the two groups for outcomes of global improvement, relapse and leaving the study early. More people in the perphenazine enanthate group, however, required anticholinergic drugs than those allocated to clopenthixol decanoate (RR 1.12 CI 1.0 to 1.2, NNT 10).A single study (n=64, duration six weeks) compared perphenazine enanthate and its longer acting decanoate ester. Data on relapse and leaving the study early failed to show convincing differences. The enanthate group, however, experienced more movement disorders (RR 1.36, CI 1.1 to 1.8 NNT 5) than those allocated the decanoate ester of the same drug and required more anticholinergic drugs (RR 1.47 CI 1.1 to 2.0, NNT 4). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Depot perphenazine is in clinical use in the Nordic countries, Belgium, Portugal and the Netherlands. At a conservative estimate, a quarter of a million people suffer from schizophrenia in those countries and could be treated with depot perphenazine. The total number of participants in the four trials with useful data is 313. None of the studies observed the effects of oral versus depot antipsychotic drugs. Until well conducted and reported randomised trials are undertaken clinicians will be in doubt as to the effects of perphenazine depots and people with schizophrenia should exercise their own judgement or ask to be randomised.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

PubMed1987

Enzymatic hydrolysis of haloperidol decanoate and its inhibition by proteins.

When [14C]haloperidol decanoate, a long-acting neuroleptic and an ester of haloperidol and decanoic acid, was incubated in human whole blood and plasma and in rat plasma and homogenates of rat brain, lung, liver, kidney, pancreas and muscle, no hydrolysis of the ester was seen. Although the decanoate was hydrolyzed by partially purified carboxylesterase, addition of rat plasma or liver homogenate to the enzymic reaction mixture resulted in marked inhibition of hydrolysis, whereas addition of the defatted residues of plasma or liver produced only partial inhibition. The enzymic hydrolysis was inhibited also by beta-lipoprotein and albumin, depending on their concentrations. The assumption that interaction between haloperidol decanoate and protein resulted in inhibition of the hydrolytic reaction mediated by the enzyme was validated by kinetic models and experimental data. The kinetics were apparently competitive. Based on the kinetic analysis, the interaction between the decanoate and albumin or beta-lipoprotein was investigated by measuring their equilibrium constants and extent of protein binding. Haloperidol decanoate appeared to interact with several proteins; this was exemplified by other measures of protein binding, an increasing effect of proteins on the solubility, and the partition ratio of the ester. The interaction between haloperidol decanoate and proteins caused marked stabilization of this ester against enzymatic hydrolysis and, thereby, influenced its metabolism.

Animals↗

PubMed1981

Flupenthixol decanoate in recurrent manic-depressive illness. A comparison with lithium.

The hypothesis that flupenthixol decanoate may serve as an alternative to prophylactically administered lithium in recurrent manic-depressive illness, bipolar and unipolar type, was tested in two groups of patients. In Group I the patients were allocated randomly to maintenance treatment with either lithium or flupenthixol decanoate. The patients in Group II had previously been given lithium and were switched to flupenthixol decanoate because of unsatisfactory prophylactic effect of lithium, doubtful tablet compliance, troublesome side effects, or fear of later harmful effects. The flupenthixol decanoate dosage was 20 mg every 2-3 weeks. The study was not blind. In Group I neither lithium treatment (14 patients) nor treatment with flupenthixol decanoate (19 patients) led to a significant fall of mean episode frequency or mean per cent time ill. The reasons for this lack of response are not clear, but prognostically negative selection of the patients presumably took place before and possibly also during the hospitalization. Since absent effects cannot be compared, this part of the trial remains inconclusive. In Group II (93 patients) treatment with flupenthixol decanoate was associated with significant falls of the frequency of manic episodes and per cent time ill in mania and with significant rises of the frequency of depressive episodes and per cent time ill in depression. Increase of depressive morbidity was seen only in patients who had been given lithium during the pre-trial period and was presumably a result of the discontinuation of lithium. It is not known whether flupenthixol decanoate is of value in the prophylactic treatment of recurrent manic-depressive illness, but the drug may be worth trying in patients whose disease is dominated more by manic than by depressive recurrences and who do not respond to lithium or do not tolerate it or do not take it.

Bipolar Disorder↗

PubMed2002

Persistent antagonism of methamphetamine-induced dopamine release in rats pretreated with GBR12909 decanoate.

Methamphetamine abuse is a serious global health problem, and no effective treatments for methamphetamine dependence have been developed. In animals, the addictive properties of methamphetamine are mediated via release of dopamine (DA) from nerve terminals in mesolimbic reward circuits. At the molecular level, methamphetamine promotes DA release by a nonexocytotic diffusion-exchange process involving DA transporter (DAT) proteins. We have shown that blocking DAT activity with high-affinity DA uptake inhibitors, such as 1-[2-[bis(4-fluorophenyl)methoxy]ethyl]-4-(3-phenylpropyl) piperazine (GBR12909), can substantially reduce amphetamine-induced DA release in vivo. In the present study, we examined the ability of a long-acting depot formulation of GBR12909 decanoate (GBR-decanoate) to influence neurochemical actions of methamphetamine in the nucleus accumbens of rats. Rats received single injections of GBR-decanoate (480 mg/kg i.m.) and were subjected to in vivo microdialysis testing 1 and 2 weeks later. Pretreatment with GBR-decanoate produced modest elevations in basal extracellular levels of DA, but not 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), at both time points. GBR-decanoate nearly eliminated the DA-releasing ability of methamphetamine (0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg i.v.) for 2 weeks, whereas methamphetamine-induced 5-HT release was unaffected. Autoradiographic analysis revealed that GBR-decanoate caused long-term decreases in DAT binding in the brain. Our data suggest that GBR-decanoate, or similar agents, may be useful adjuncts in treating methamphetamine dependence. This therapeutic strategy would be especially useful for noncompliant patient populations.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Clinical pharmacokinetics of haloperidol decanoate. Comparison with other prolonged-action neuroleptics].

Precise pharmacokinetic data of long-acting neuroleptics: apparent half life (T 1/2), time of peak plasma concentration (Tmax), bioavailability, has been a major contribution to determine optimal dosage of the drug. If the aim of the depot neuroleptic is to obtain a stable plasma concentration of the neuroleptic after I.M. injection of the ester form equivalent to that following oral administration, it is logical to obtain the same pharmacological effect; this is true for haloperidol decanoate. Mean value of T 1/2 of clopenthixol decanoate and haloperidol decanoate are 19 and 21 days, respectively, they thereby justify monthly administration. Flupenthixol decanoate and fluphenazine enanthate should be injected with dosing intervals of 3 and 1 weeks, respectively in respect with their half-lives: 17 and 4 days. Fluphenazine decanoate have a half-life of 14 days, however, the longer time the treatment, the longer the apparent half-life, suggesting to reduce the dose or to enlarge the dosing interval. Optimal dose has been determined from the bioavailability of the oral formulation and the interval between two injections, it averages 15, 20 times the oral daily dose for haloperidol decanoate. A lower conversion factor is frequently used (0.5 to 5 times) for other depot-neuroleptics such as pipotiazine palmitate, fluphenazine enanthate or decanoate; these low factors are not entirely explainable by the low bioavailability of the oral forms and produces more lower plasma concentration than after oral administration.

Biological Availability↗

PubMed1997

Nandrolone decanoate and intranasal calcitonin as therapy in established osteoporosis.

This study used a randomized, 2 x 2 factorial design to evaluate over 2 years the effect of intranasal salmon calcitonin and intramuscular nandrolone decanoate on bone mass in elderly women with established osteoporosis. The study was double masked in relation to calcitonin and open in relation to nandrolone decanoate. One hundred and twenty-three women aged 60-88 years who had sustained a previous osteoporotic fracture, or had osteopenia, were recruited through an outpatient clinic. Women were assigned to one of four groups: (1) daily placebo nasal spray, (2) 400 IU intranasal calcitonin daily, (3) 20 intramuscular injections of 50 mg nandrolone decanoate (given as two courses of 10 injections) plus placebo nasal spray, or (4) 20 injections of 50 mg nandrolone decanoate plus 400 IU intranasal calcitonin daily. All subjects received 1000 mg calcium supplementation daily. Outcomes measured included changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, as measured by dual-energy quantitative computed tomography (DEQCT), in BMD of the proximal femur, and BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) of the lumbar spine and forearm, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Significant positive changes from baseline in DXA BMC at the lumbar spine were observed over 2 years in the calcitonin group (5.0 +/- 1.9%, mean +/- SE) and in the nandrolone deconate group (4.7 +/- 1.9%) but not in the placebo group (1.1 +/- 2.2%) or the combined therapy group (0.7 +/- 1.8%). Modelling based on the 2 x 2 factorial design revealed that nandrolone decanoate was associated with a 3.8 +/- 1.8% (p < 0.05) gain in DXA BMD at the proximal femur. Modelling also revealed that calcitonin treatment was associated with a loss of 11.5 +/- 4.7% in DEQCT BMD at the lumbar spine and a loss of 3.7 +/- 1.8% in DXA BMD at the proximal femur (p < 0.05). There was in vivo antagonism between the two medications of 7.9 +/- 3.9% for DXA BMC at the lumbar spine. Both agents caused positive changes from baseline in lumbar spine BMC. Nandrolone decanoate had beneficial effects on BMD at the proximal femur. This dose of intranasal calcitonin was associated with deleterious effects on trabecular BMD at the lumbar spine and total BMD at the proximal femur. There may be significant clinical antagonism between these two medications.

Administration, Intranasal↗

PubMed1985

Nandrolone decanoate added to tamoxifen in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Since 1980 we have been carrying out a prospective randomized trial comparing tamoxifen with the combination of tamoxifen plus nandrolone decanoate in advanced breast cancer. The tamoxifen dose is 30 mg daily and the nandrolone decanoate dose 100 mg i.m. once a week for four weeks and thereafter every other week. 98 post-menopausal patients have been evaluated for the response. The number of patients is 49 in both groups. The overall response rates (CR + PR) to tamoxifen and tamoxifen plus nandrolone decanoate were not significantly different; in the tamoxifen group the response rate was 49% and in the combination group 45%. The mean time to progression in tamoxifen group is over 13 months and in tamoxifen plus nandrolone decanoate group over 12 months. Our results do not suggest a synergistic effect from combining tamoxifen and nandrolone decanoate treatments. The response rates to tamoxifen at different sites of metastases were as follows: bones 47%, soft tissues 56%, and viscera 48%. The respective figures with the combination therapy were 36%, 64%, and 40%. Both treatments were well tolerated and in no patient was withdrawal of the therapy necessary. Mild virilization and hoarseness were experienced by all patients treated with nandrolone decanoate. Side-effects associated with tamoxifen were rare, although five patients experienced nausea and two had hot flushes.

Aged↗