Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Clonal Anergy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

A cell culture model for T lymphocyte clonal anergy.

T lymphocytes respond to foreign antigens both by producing protein effector molecules known as lymphokines and by multiplying. Complete activation requires two signaling events, one through the antigen-specific receptor and one through the receptor for a costimulatory molecule. In the absence of the latter signal, the T cell makes only a partial response and, more importantly, enters an unresponsive state known as clonal anergy in which the T cell is incapable of producing its own growth hormone, interleukin-2, on restimulation. Our current understanding at the molecular level of this modulatory process and its relevance to T cell tolerance are reviewed.

Animals↗

Direct tolerance induction in mature B lymphocytes may resemble clonal anergy phenomenon.

Several mechanisms have been postulated for direct induction of B-cell tolerance in mature B cells, such as the Bretscher and Cohn [5] hypothesis which states that an antigenic signal to B cells without the 'second signal' provided by T cells or lymphokines produces unresponsiveness. A second explanation is that tolerogens which cross-link immunoglobulin and Fc receptors abort the biochemical activation of the B cell via the phosphatidyl inositol pathway. Results of our studies are not consistent with either of these hypotheses. We speculated that DNP-MGG induces immunoglobulin receptor capping and internalization in mature B cells, but a suppressive signal is given to the B cell when DNP-MGG is present at the time of antigen receptor reexpression in a fashion similar to clonal anergy. The studies reported here test this hypothesis as a possible additional mechanism of direct B-cell tolerance. When pure DNP-specific B cells were incubated for 6 h with DNP-MGG in the presence of lymphokine-rich EL-4 supernatant, an immune response was induced; but 48 h preincubation with DNP-MGG in the presence of lymphokines induced tolerance. If B-cell cultures were preincubated with DNP-MGG for 6 h followed by a 24-hour incubation without conjugate and DNP-MGG was then added for the third preincubation period of 18 h (at a time when receptors are being reexpressed), tolerance was induced. Substitution of DNP-Ficoll antigen for DNP-MGG in either the first or third time period did not result in tolerance induction but substituting DNP-KLH during either of these two periods did result in tolerance.

Animals↗

Evidence that anti-CD8 abrogates anti-CD4-mediated clonal anergy but allows allograft survival in mice.

Monoclonal antibodies directed against different T cell subpopulations have been used in several rodent models of transplantation to induce long-term unresponsiveness to allografts by a variety of mechanisms. To investigate whether different mechanisms may be operative when different regimens of mAb therapy are used, we studied the effects of various combinations of anti-T-cell antibody treatment on the induction of tolerance in a mouse islet allograft model. Anti-CD4 mAb alone, anti-CD8 mAb alone, anti-CD4 mAb plus anti-CD8 mAb, and anti-Thy1.2 mAb alone were given at the time of engraftment. Only the anti-CD4 mAb and the anti-CD4 mAb plus anti-CD8 mAb regimens were successful in inducing permanent unresponsiveness to islet allografts. We have previously shown that anti-CD4 mAb alone induces permanent unresponsiveness to islet allografts by a mechanism of clonal anergy, as demonstrated by unresponsiveness of potentially alloreactive T cells to anti-T-cell receptor-specific cross-linking. Interestingly, the potentially alloreactive T cell subsets of recipient mice (V beta 5+ and V beta 11+) made unresponsive to islet allografts by anti-CD4 mAb plus anti-CD8 mAb therapy were not found to be anergic using the same assay. Differences between the repopulation kinetics of CD8+ T cells of anti-CD4 mAb plus anti-CD8 mAb treated recipient mice, which accepted islet allografts, and anti-Thy1.2 treated recipient mice, which rejected islet allografts despite similar levels of initial T cell depletion, suggest that unresponsiveness to alloantigen may have been induced in anti-CD4 mAb plus anti-CD8 mAb treated recipients by clearance of donor passenger leukocytes during prolonged CD8+ T cell depletion.

Animals↗

Alloantigen-specific regulation of cytotoxic T cell responses is mediated through the induction of clonal anergy of CD8+ T cells.

Priming mice with an alloantigen before immunization with this same alloantigen presented in association with a second one on an F1 stimulator cell inhibits the induction of cytotoxic response directed against the second alloantigen. This inhibition is associated with the induction of a strong cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response against the first priming alloantigen. For example, a specific suppression of anti-H-2b CTL responses could be induced in C3H/He mice (H-2k) by priming them with H-2d spleen cells before immunization with F1 (H-2dxb) spleen cells. In the present study, we have analyzed the mechanisms underlying this specific suppression of CTL responses. We have demonstrated that the reduction of H-2b-specific CTL responses is reflected by a decrease in the frequency of effector cells specific for H-2b antigen. However, there was no difference in the frequencies of precursor CTL in control and suppressed mice excluding clonal deletion as the mechanism maintaining low responsiveness. Co-culture experiments have shown that the suppression of anti-H-2b CTL responses was not due to suppressor cells but to the failure of CD8+ T cells of suppressed mice to collaborate with normal helper CD4+ T cells. The suppression was therefore ascribed to a functional impairment (clonal anergy) of the CD8+ T cell subset.

Animals↗

Evidence for clonal anergy as a mechanism responsible for the maintenance of transplantation tolerance.

The main stimulus triggering early acute allograft rejection is known to be delivered by the allogeneic "passenger" leukocytes present within the grafts. Once these cells have been replaced by cells of recipient origin, subsequent rejection episodes are generally less frequent and less acutely destructive. How this replacement affects the cell populations responsible for allograft rejection is not known. Here we report that rat alloreactive non-cytotoxic AS (RT1I) anti-August (RT1c) CD4+ T cells, that were shown to be specific for RT1.Bc+ August spleen stimulators, were able to cause acute rejection of normal August kidney allografts transplanted into sublethally irradiated AS recipients. These cells, however, failed to reject passenger cell-depleted (PCD) August kidneys, despite the substantial expression of RT1.Bc+ products on the graft tubular epithelium. In experiments in vitro, August kidney tubular epithelial cells expressing RT1.Bc+ antigens were found to be unable to stimulate the alloreactive T cells to proliferate. Moreover, preincubation with class II-positive August kidney epithelial cells specifically abrogated the alloreactivity of the T cells. Adding recombinant interleukin-2, however, restored the response to alloantigens. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that T cell populations capable of mediating early acute allograft rejection are different from those mediating late rejection, when donor passenger leukocytes are no longer present. They also suggest clonal anergy as one of the mechanisms responsible for maintaining long-term transplantation tolerance.

Animals↗

Bone marrow pre-B cells and the clonal anergy theory of immunologic tolerance.

This review begins with a summary of a decade's research from the author's own laboratory which documents the fact that B lymphocytes can receive and store negative, down-regulatory signals from an encounter with antigen, and that the sensitivity to such negative signalling depends critically on maturational status, the most immature B cells being the most susceptible. The review then examines the relationship between these experimentally-induced models of immunologic tolerance, with the pre-B to B cell transition as the critical stage for examination, and the real-life phenomenon of self-tolerance. It makes the point that no repertoire-purging mechanism to ensure self-tolerance can afford to be too effective, for fear of purging too many useful cells, given the number and variability of self-antigens. The review then examines certain dilemmas posed by recent findings in cellular and molecular immunology. These include: 1) the preferential use of particular VH gene families by B cells at different stages of the differentiation process; 2) the apparent frequency of B lymphocytes with the potential for antiself-reactivity in the B cell repertoire; and 3) the existence of a new type of B cell, the Ly-1-positive B cell, with peculiar characteristics. These findings are considered within the particular contexts of pre-B-to-B cell transition and tolerance induction through clonal anergy mechanisms.

Animals↗

UV irradiation can induce in vitro clonal anergy in alloreactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

The alloreactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) were generated by coculturing peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) with allogeneic Sa cells (an Epstein-Barr virus [EBV]-transformed B-cell line). The CTL did not proliferate in response to UV-B-irradiated Sa cells unless exogenous interleukin-2 (IL-2) was present, although they could kill the UV-B-irradiated Sa cells. The results indicate that UV-B-irradiated Sa cells do not provide sufficient signals for the proliferation of the CTL while they can be recognized by CTL and induce high-affinity IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) expression on them. The alloreactive CTL could be rendered anergic by previous exposure to UV-B-irradiated Sa cells. The alloreactive CTL previously stimulated with UV-B-irradiated Sa cells failed to proliferate in response to nontreated Sa cells. Proliferation of the anergic CTL could not be restored by Sa cells and exogenous IL-2 but by the combination of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and calcium ionophore (A23187). The anergic CTL showed a considerably low cytotoxic activity against Sa target cells. The expression of TCR on the anergic CTL was downregulated while expression of high-affinity IL-2R was upregulated. Their CD28 and CD8 expression were unchanged. In addition, the proliferative response and cytotoxicity of the anergic CTL to Sa cells could be restored after the cells had been rested for 7 days to allow reexpression of TCR. These results suggest that downregulation of T-cell receptor (TCR) and impairment in the post-IL-2/IL-2R signaling pathway are relevant to the clonal anergy induced in the alloreactive CTL by stimulation of UV-B-irradiated Sa cells.

Antigens, CD↗

Oral tolerance in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. III. Evidence for clonal anergy.

We have recently reported that experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) can be suppressed by the oral administration of myelin basic protein (MBP). The oral introduction of 20 mg MBP together with a trypsin inhibitor results in inhibition of EAE clinical signs, decreased CNS histopathologic changes and dramatically reduced MBP-specific proliferative responses in fed and challenged Lewis rats. In the present study, we have investigated the mechanism underlying MBP-induced oral tolerance in EAE. Neither lymphoid cells (lymph node cells, spleen cells, Peyer's patch lymphocytes, thymocytes) nor humoral elements derived from tolerant donors were capable of transferring the tolerance to naive recipients. Moreover, lymphoid cells obtained from orally tolerant donors exhibited a marked decrease in their capacity to transfer EAE to naive recipient rats, even after in vitro activation with MBP or Con A. We observed that EAE could be readily transferred into orally tolerant rats using MBP-specific encephalitogenic T cell lines. In vitro cell mixing studies showed that the proliferation of lymphocytes from MBP-sensitized donors was not inhibited by the addition of lymphoid cells from tolerant donors, arguing against the role of a suppressor cell. Investigation of MBP-stimulated lymphokine production showed that both IL-2 and IFN-gamma levels were substantially decreased in spleen and lymph node cell cultures from MBP-fed rats compared to vehicle-fed control animals. Furthermore, limiting dilution analyses revealed that MBP-fed rats exhibited a profound decrease in MBP-reactive, IL-2-secreting lymphocytes relative to control animals. Thus, because lymphocytes from MBP-fed rats neither proliferate nor secrete IL-2 or IFN-gamma in response to MBP and we can find no compelling evidence for the role of suppressor cells, we propose that the oral administration of MBP results in a state of clonal anergy.

Animals↗

Clonal deletion and clonal anergy in allogeneic bone marrow chimeras prepared with TBI or TLI.

The evolution of Vbeta6-expressing C3H (H2k, Thy 1.2, Mls a-) lymphocytes was investigated in C3H recipients mice pretreated with total body irradiation (TBI) or total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) and infusion of AKR (H2k, Thy 1.1, Mls a+) cells. After TBI (9.5 Gy) all Vbeta6+ Thy 1.2 (C3H) cells, which are capable of reacting against the Mls a antigen that like expressed by AKR mice, were deleted in the thymus and the periphery in stable bone marrow (BM) chimeras obtained by infusion of 5 x 10(6) T-cell-depleted (TCD) AKR BM cells. When, in the opposite combination, 30 x 10(6) C3H spleen cells were infused into TBI-treated AKR cells, all animals developed graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with no clonal deletion and in contrast, showed an increase in Vbeta6+ C3H cells. After injection of 30 x 10(6) AKR BM cells into TLI-treated C3H mice no C3H cells were detected in the thymus and only a small percentage in the periphery. Within these C3H cells Vbeta6+ cells were only partially deleted and anergized as they did not respond in vitro after stimulation with Mls a+ AKR cells or anti-Vbeta6 mAb. Cells suppressing anti-Mls a-reacting C3H cells were not found. After injection of 15 x 10(6) AKR cells more C3H cells were found in the thymus, but only a minority of Vbeta6+ cells persisted in the periphery of these animals. In conclusion in TBI-prepared chimeras only clonal deletion occurred, whereas in TLI-prepared chimeras both clonal deletion and anergy occurred in maintaining tolerance.

Animals↗

Clonal anergy induced in a CD8+ hapten-specific cytotoxic T-cell clone by an altered hapten-peptide ligand.

Clonal T-cell anergy has been proposed as a mechanism to ensure peripheral tolerance in vivo. Anergy has been reported to result from T cell activation with inappropriate antigen-presenting cells (APC) or, in the case of CD4+ T cells, also by altered peptide ligands. This study reveals that altered hapten ligands can also induce anergy in CD8+ T cells. The Kb-restricted, trinitrophenyl (TNP) specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) clone E6 was found to lyse target cells presenting the TNP-modified peptides M4L-TNP (derived from mouse serum albumin) or O4TNP (derived from chicken ovalbumin), but not the corresponding dinitrophenol (DNP)-modified peptides. However, whereas M4L-DNP was found totally unreactive, O4DNP antagonistically inhibited M4L-TNP-mediated kill if expressed on the same target cell. Moreover, when presented alone on APC, O4DNP, but not M4L-DNP, induced anergy in clone E6 by preventing its subsequent proliferative response to M4L-TNP. The anergic state did not affect agonist-specific cytolysis or T-cell receptor (TCR) down-modulation by the anergized CTL, and proliferative responses were regained upon addition of interleukin (IL)-2 or IL-12 plus IL-18. These findings substantiate the similarity between hapten-and peptide-recognition by T cells. The induction as well as the reversal of anergy in CD8+ CTL may thus be of relevance not only in autoimmunity or tumour rejection, but also in contact hypersensitivity reactions to haptens.

Animals↗

R24 anti-GD3 ganglioside antibody can induce costimulation and prevent the induction of alloantigen-specific T cell clonal anergy.

R24 is a monoclonal antibody directed against the cell surface ganglioside GD3. It can detect GD3 on the surface of a subset of T lymphocytes and can stimulate proliferation and secretion of cytokines in vitro. In the present report, we examined the effects of the R24 antibody upon antigen-specific T cell response, employing an HLA-DR7-specific T cell clonal model. As previously shown, primary stimulation of HLA-DR7-specific alloreactive T cell clones by transfectants expressing HLA-DR7 alone (t-DR7) in the absence of B7 co-stimulation resulted in anergy. Binding of cell surface GD3 on HLA-DR7-specific alloreactive T cell clones with R24 under these anergizing conditions resulted in interleukin-2 (IL-2) accumulation and prevented the induction of alloantigen-specific T cell clonal anergy. Binding of GD3 by R24 also prevented anergy under conditions where B7:CD28 interactions were blocked by CTLA4-Ig. The effect of R24 was abrogated in the presence of a combination of monoclonal antibodies for the alpha and beta chains of the IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) or a neutralizing anti-IL-2 antibody. R24 does not appear to interact directly with the IL-2R since incubation of T cell clones with R24 did not induce early activation of IL-2R associated Jak kinases, Jak1 and Jak3, as was induced following incubation with IL-2. In contrast, incubation of HLA-DR7-specific clones with t-DR7 in the presence of R24 did result in phosphorylation of IL-2R related Jak kinases after 24 h. Our data indicate that the membrane ganglioside GD3 structure recognized by R24 may play an important role in antigen-specific T cell clonal response.

3T3 Cells↗

Evidence for involvement of clonal anergy in MHC class I and class II disparate skin allograft tolerance after the termination of intrathymic clonal deletion.

Mechanisms of cyclophosphamide (CP)-induced tolerance to class I (D) and class II (IE) alloantigens were studied. Transplantation tolerance across H-2D plus IE Ag-barriers has been achieved when B10.Thy-1.1 (Kb,IAb,IE-,Db; Thy-1.1) mice were primed i.v. with 9 x 10(7) spleen cells plus 3 x 10(7) bone marrow cells from B10.A(5R) mice (5R; kb,IAb,IEb,Dd; Thy-1.2) and treated i.p. with 200 mg/kg of CP 2 days later. The tolerant state in the early and the late stage was confirmed by prolonged acceptance of donor-type skin grafts, and in vitro unresponsiveness to donor Ag. In the tolerant B10.Thy-1.1 mice treated with 5R cells 28 days earlier and followed by CP, intrathymic clonal deletion of V beta 11+ T cells reactive to IE-encoded antigens was observed in association with intrathymic mixed chimerism. 5R skin survived, however, even after the clonal deletion of V beta 11+ T cells terminated by 180 days after tolerance induction. V beta 11+ T cells, which reappeared in the periphery of the recipient B10.Thy-1.1 mice bearing 5R skin at this stage, were not capable of proliferating in response to receptor cross-linking with V beta 11-specific mAb. Furthermore, the CTL activity against class I (Dd) alloantigens of spleen cells from these tolerant mice was restored by the addition of IL-2 to MLC. Thus, our experiments provide direct evidence that tolerance to both class I (Dd) and class II (IEb) alloantigens by clonal allergy occurs during the termination of intrathymic clonal deletion. These results clearly show practical hierarchy of the mechanisms of transplantation tolerance.

Animals↗

Maintenance of clonal anergy by endogenously produced IL-10.

Inadequate co-stimulation of tumor reactive T cells may contribute to the fact that antigenic tumors are not normally rejected by the immune system. We recently reported that the induction of profound unresponsiveness in a T cell clone by melanoma cells expressing MHC class II antigens may provide a mechanism for these tumor cells to escape immunosurveillance. Here we demonstrate that two T cell clones (sTC3 and sTS5) produced high amounts of IL-10 after being rendered anergic by autologous melanoma cells. Co-culture of these T cell clones with melanoma cell transfectants expressing B7, which failed to induce anergy, resulted in a significantly lower production of IL-10. IL-10 production by the anergic T cell clones correlated with an impaired ability to produce IL-2 in response to TCR mediated activation. Neutralization of IL-10 reduced the duration of T cell unresponsiveness from 14 to only 4 days, but inhibition of IL-10 production during initiation of anergy showed no effect on it. Induction of the unresponsive state, as well as the subsequent IL-10 production in sTC3 cells, could be prevented by the addition of cyclosporin A to the primary co-culture of sTC3 and the autologous melanoma. Taken together, these results indicate that IL-10 is important for maintenance of T cell anergy induced by contact with nonprofessional antigen presenting cells such as MHC class II+ melanoma cells. Furthermore, we were able to detect IL-10 in serum from melanoma patients and IL-10 mRNA in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes isolated from melanoma metastases, suggesting an in vivo relevance of our in vitro findings.

Base Sequence↗

Nonmitogenic anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies deliver a partial T cell receptor signal and induce clonal anergy.

Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are potent immunosuppressive agents used in clinical transplantation. However, the activation-related adverse side effects associated with these mAbs have prompted the development of less toxic nonmitogenic anti-CD3 mAb therapies. At present, the functional and biochemical consequences of T cell exposure to nonmitogenic anti-CD3 is unclear. In this study, we have examined the early signaling events triggered by a nonmitogenic anti-CD3 mAb. Like the mitogenic anti-CD3 mAb, nonnmitogenic anti-CD3 triggered changes in the T cell receptor (TCR) complex, including zeta chain tyrosine phosphorylation and ZAP-70 association. However, unlike the mitogenic anti-CD3 stimulation, nonmitogenic anti-CD3 was ineffective at inducing the highly phosphorylated form of zeta (p23) and tyrosine phosphorylation of the associated ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase. This proximal signaling deficiency correlated with minimal phospholipase Cgamma-1 phosphorylation and failure to mobilize detectable Ca2+. Not only did biochemical signals delivered by nonmitogenic anti-CD3 resemble altered peptide ligand signaling, but exposure of Th1 clones to nonmitogenic anti-CD3 also resulted in functional anergy. Finally, a bispecific anti-CD3 X anti-CD4 F(ab)'2 reconstituted early signal transduction events and induced proliferation, suggesting that defective association of lck with the TCR complex may underlie the observed signaling differences between the mitogenic and nonmitogenic anti-CD3.

Animals↗

Early growth response gene-2, a zinc-finger transcription factor, is required for full induction of clonal anergy in CD4+ T cells.

Ag-specific immune tolerance results from the induction of cellular mechanisms that limit T cell responses to selective Ags. One of these mechanisms is characterized by attenuated proliferation and decreased IL-2 production in fully stimulated CD4(+) Th cells and is denoted T cell anergy. We report the identification of the early growth response gene (Egr-2; Krox-20), a zinc-finger transcription factor, as a key protein required for induction of anergy in cultured T cells. Gene array screening revealed high Egr-2 expression distinctly persists in anergized but not proliferating murine A.E7 T cells. In contrast, Egr-1, a related family member induced upon costimulation, displays little or no expression in the anergic state. IL-2-mediated abrogation of anergy causes rapid depletion of Egr-2 protein. Full stimulation of anergic A.E7 T cells fails to enhance IL-2 and Egr-1 expression, whereas Egr-2 expression is greatly increased. Silencing Egr-2 gene expression by small interfering RNA treatment of cultured A.E7 T cells before incubation with anti-CD3 alone prevents full induction of anergy. However, small interfering RNA-mediated depletion of Egr-2 5 days after anergy induction does not appear to abrogate hyporesponsiveness to stimulation. These data indicate that sustained Egr-2 expression is necessary to induce a full anergic state through the actions of genes regulated by this transcription factor.

Animals↗