Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Chromosome Segregation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Exchanges are not equally able to enhance meiotic chromosome segregation in yeast.

Homologous chromosomes pair, and then migrate to opposite poles of the spindle at meiosis I. In most eukaryotic organisms, reciprocal recombinations (crossovers) between the homologs are critical to the success of this process. Individuals with defects in meiotic recombination typically produce high levels of aneuploid gametes and exhibit low fertility or are sterile. The experiments described here were designed to test whether different crossovers are equally able to contribute to the fidelity of meiotic chromosome segregation in yeast. These experiments were performed with model chromosomes with which it was possible to control and measure the distributions of meiotic crossovers in wild-type cells. Physical and genetic approaches were used to map crossover positions on model chromosomes and to correlate crossover position with meiotic segregation behavior. The results show that crossovers at different chromosomal positions have different abilities to enhance the fidelity of meiotic segregation.

Chromosome Mapping↗

Phosphorylation of the mitotic regulator protein Hec1 by Nek2 kinase is essential for faithful chromosome segregation.

Hec1 (highly expressed in cancer) plays essential roles in chromosome segregation by interacting through its coiled-coil domains with several proteins that modulate the G(2)/M phase. Hec1 localizes to kinetochores, and its inactivation either by genetic deletion or antibody neutralization leads to severe and lethal chromosomal segregation errors, indicating that Hec1 plays a critical role in chromosome segregation. The mechanisms by which Hec1 is regulated, however, are not known. Here we show that human Hec1 is a serine phosphoprotein and that it binds specifically to the mitotic regulatory kinase Nek2 during G(2)/M. Nek2 phosphorylates Hec1 on serine residue 165, both in vitro and in vivo. Yeast cells are viable without scNek2/Kin3, a close structural homolog of Nek2 that binds to both human and yeast Hec1. When the same yeasts carry an scNek2/Kin3 (D55G) or Nek2 (E38G) mutation to mimic a similar temperature-sensitive nima mutation in Aspergillus, their growth is arrested at the nonpermissive temperature, because the scNek2/Kin3 (D55G) mutant binds to Hec1 but fails to phosphorylate it. Whereas wild-type human Hec1 rescues lethality resulting from deletion of Hec1 in Saccharomyces cerevesiae, a human Hec1 mutant or yeast Hec1 mutant changing Ser(165) to Ala or yeast Hec1 mutant changing Ser(201) to Ala does not. Mutations changing the same Ser residues to Glu, to mimic the negative charge created by phosphorylation, partially rescue lethality but result in a high incidence of errors in chromosomal segregation. These results suggest that cell cycle-regulated serine phosphorylation of Hec1 by Nek2 is essential for faithful chromosome segregation.

Alanine↗

Basic mechanism of eukaryotic chromosome segregation.

We now have firm evidence that the basic mechanism of chromosome segregation is similar among diverse eukaryotes as the same genes are employed. Even in prokaryotes, the very basic feature of chromosome segregation has similarities to that of eukaryotes. Many aspects of chromosome segregation are closely related to a cell cycle control that includes stage-specific protein modification and proteolysis. Destruction of mitotic cyclin and securin leads to mitotic exit and separase activation, respectively. Key players in chromosome segregation are SMC-containing cohesin and condensin, DNA topoisomerase II, APC/C ubiquitin ligase, securin-separase complex, aurora passengers, and kinetochore microtubule destabilizers or regulators. In addition, the formation of mitotic kinetochore and spindle apparatus is absolutely essential. The roles of principal players in basic chromosome segregation are discussed: most players have interphase as well as mitotic functions. A view on how the centromere/kinetochore is formed is described.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Hec1 sequentially recruits Zwint-1 and ZW10 to kinetochores for faithful chromosome segregation and spindle checkpoint control.

Faithful chromosome segregation is essential for maintaining the genomic integrity, which requires coordination among chromosomes, kinetochores, centrosomes and spindles during mitosis. Previously, we discovered a novel coiled-coil protein, highly expressed in cancer 1 (Hec1), which is indispensable for this process. However, the precise underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, we show that Hec1 directly interacts with human ZW10 interacting protein (Zwint-1), a binding partner of Zeste White 10 (ZW10) that is required for chromosome motility and spindle checkpoint control. In mitotic cells, Hec1 transiently forms complexes with Zwint-1 and ZW10 in a temporal and spatial manner. Although the three proteins have variable cell cycle-dependent expression profiles, they can only be co-immunoprecipitated during M phase. Immunofluorescent study showed that Hec1 and Zwint-1 co-localize at kinetochores beginning at prophase and that ZW10 joins them later at prometaphase. Depletion of Hec1 impairs the recruitment of both Zwint-1 and ZW10 to kinetochores, while depletion of Zwint-1 abrogates the kinetochore localization of ZW10 but not Hec1. The results suggest that the localization of Hec1 at kinetochores is required for the sequential recruitment of Zwint-1 and ZW10. Disrupting this recruitment by inhibiting the expression of Hec1 or Zwint-1 causes chromosome missegregation, spindle checkpoint failure, and eventually cell death upon cytokinesis. Taken together, these results, at least in part, provide a molecular basis to explain how Hec1 plays a crucial role for spindle checkpoint control and faithful chromosome segregation.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗

The Cdc14 phosphatase and the FEAR network control meiotic spindle disassembly and chromosome segregation.

During meiosis, DNA replication is followed by two consecutive rounds of chromosome segregation. Cells lacking the protein phosphatase CDC14 or its regulators, SPO12 and SLK19, undergo only a single meiotic division, with some chromosomes segregating reductionally and others equationally. We find that this abnormal chromosome behavior is due to an uncoupling of meiotic events. Anaphase I spindle disassembly is delayed in cdc14-1, slk19Delta, or spo12Delta mutants, but the chromosome segregation cycle continues, so that both meiotic chromosome segregation phases take place on the persisting meiosis I spindle. Our results show that Cdc14, Slk19, and Spo12 are not only required for meiosis I spindle disassembly but also play a pivotal role in establishing two consecutive chromosome segregation phases, a key feature of the meiotic cell cycle.

Anaphase↗

A strand-specific model for chromosome segregation in bacteria.

Chromosome separation and segregation must be executed within a bacterial cell in which the membrane and cytoplasm are highly structured. Here, we develop a strand-specific model based on each of the future daughter chromosomes being associated with a different set of structures or hyperstructures in an asymmetric cell. The essence of the segregation mechanism is that the genes on the same strand in the parental cell that are expressed together in a hyperstructure continue to be expressed together and segregate together in the daughter cell. The model therefore requires an asymmetric distribution of classes of genes and of binding sites and other structures on the strands of the parental chromosome. We show that the model is consistent with the asymmetric distribution of highly expressed genes and of stress response genes in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. The model offers a framework for interpreting data from genomics.

Bacillus subtilis↗

[The relationship between nuclear-cytoplasmic transport and chromosome segregation].

Chromosomes/chromatids transport to cell division poles (chromosome segregation) and nuclear-cytoplasmic transport give way to each other during cell cycle. Disassembly and reassembly of the nuclear envelope during input or output mitosis are the critical time periods for changing one kind of transport system for the other one. The interest in the problem of relationships between nuclear-cytoplasmic transport and chromosome segregation came into view after revealing some factors involved in both transport systems. Among these factors are GTPase Ran, nuclear transport receptors and associated molecules, kinetochore proteins and proteins of nuclear pore complexes (nucleoprin, for example), spindle microtubules, microtubule motor proteins, and signal molecules. The role of all of these factors in the transport systems is not known. A decision of this problem will make it possible to determine mechanisms of both transport systems and to understand the character of evolutionary relationships between these systems.

Animals↗

Role of Polo-like kinase CDC5 in programming meiosis I chromosome segregation.

Meiosis is a specialized cell division in which two chromosome segregation phases follow a single DNA replication phase. The budding yeast Polo-like kinase Cdc5 was found to be instrumental in establishing the meiosis I chromosome segregation program. Cdc5 was required to phosphorylate and remove meiotic cohesin from chromosomes. Furthermore, in the absence of CDC5 kinetochores were bioriented during meiosis I, and Mam1, a protein essential for coorientation, failed to associate with kinetochores. Thus, sister-kinetochore coorientation and chromosome segregation during meiosis I are coupled through their dependence on CDC5.

Anaphase↗

HCP-1, a protein involved in chromosome segregation, is localized to the centromere of mitotic chromosomes in Caenorhabditis elegans.

To learn more about holocentric chromosome structure and function, we generated a monoclonal antibody (mAb), 6C4, that recognizes the poleward face of mitotic chromosomes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Early in mitosis, mAb 6C4 stains dots throughout the nucleoplasm. Later in prophase, mAb 6C4 stains structures on opposing faces of chromosomes which orient towards the centrosomes at metaphase. Colocalization with an antibody against a centromeric histone H3-like protein and the MPM-2 antibody, which identifies a kinetochore-associated phosphoepitope present in a variety of organisms, shows that the mAb 6C4 staining is present adjacent to the centromere. Expression screening using mAb 6C4 identified a protein in C. elegans that we named HCP-1 (for holocentric protein 1). We also identified a second protein from the C. elegans genome sequence database, HCP-2, that is 54% similar to HCP-1. When expression of HCP-1 is reduced by RNA interference (RNAi), staining with mAb 6C4 is eliminated, indicating that hcp-1 encodes the major mAb 6C4 antigen. RNAi with hcp-1 and hcp-2 together results in aberrant anaphases and embryonic arrest at approximately 100 cells with different amounts of DNA in individual nuclei. These results suggest that HCP-1 is a centromere-associated protein that is involved in the fidelity of chromosome segregation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Actin-binding proteins required for reliable chromosome segregation in mitosis.

While studying mitosis in Dictyostelium mutants with deficiencies in actin-binding proteins, we found that two of these proteins, cortexillin and Aip1, are required for the precise segregation of chromosomes. Atypical spindles and nuclei with varying DNA content indicate that mutants lacking cortexillin or Aip1 are genetically unstable. These aberrations are caused by the detachment and irregular reattachment of centrosomes to the nuclear surface. Live imaging showed how coalescing mitotic complexes give rise to a multipolar spindle, and how excess centrosomes can be eliminated by mitotic cleavage between anucleate and nucleated portions of a cell. We hypothesize that mutations in regulatory proteins of the actin network might be one cause of genetic instability of malignant tumor cells.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

Mammalian recombination-repair genes XRCC2 and XRCC3 promote correct chromosome segregation.

Growth and development are dependent on the faithful duplication of cells. Duplication requires accurate genome replication, the repair of any DNA damage, and the precise segregation of chromosomes at mitosis; molecular checkpoints ensure the proper progression and fidelity of each stage. Loss of any of these highly conserved functions may result in genetic instability and proneness to cancer. Here we show that highly significant increases in chromosome missegregation occur in cell lines lacking the RAD51-like genes XRCC2 and XRCC3. This increased missegregation is associated with fragmentation of the centrosome, a component of the mitotic spindle, and not with loss of the spindle checkpoint. Our results show that unresolved DNA damage triggers this instability, and that XRCC2 and XRCC3 are potential tumour-suppressor genes in mammals.

Animals↗

The yeast RSC chromatin-remodeling complex is required for kinetochore function in chromosome segregation.

The accurate segregation of chromosomes requires the kinetochore, a complex protein machine that assembles onto centromeric DNA to mediate attachment of replicated sister chromatids to the mitotic spindle apparatus. This study reveals an important role for the yeast RSC ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complex at the kinetochore in chromosome transmission. Mutations in genes encoding two core subunits of RSC, the ATPase Sth1p and the Snf5p homolog Sfh1p, interact genetically with mutations in genes encoding kinetochore proteins and with a mutation in centromeric DNA. RSC also interacts genetically and physically with the histone and histone variant components of centromeric chromatin. Importantly, RSC is localized to centromeric and centromere-proximal chromosomal regions, and its association with these loci is dependent on Sth1p. Both sth1 and sfh1 mutants exhibit altered centromeric and centromere-proximal chromatin structure and increased missegregation of authentic chromosomes. Finally, RSC is not required for centromeric deposition of the histone H3 variant Cse4p, suggesting that RSC plays a role in reconfiguring centromeric and flanking nucleosomes following Cse4p recruitment for proper chromosome transmission.

Carrier Proteins↗

Regulation of yeast chromosome segregation by Ipl1 protein kinase and type 1 protein phosphatase.

Chromosome segregation is a complicated process that involves the coordinated functioning of a large number of cellular components. In this process, many proteins are activated and inactivated in a strict temporal order. While much progress has been made recently in the identification of structural components that are involved in chromosome segregation, relatively little is known about their regulation. We have investigated the chromosome segregation process in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Our results indicate that this process absolutely requires a functional Ipl1 protein kinase. Upon inactivation of this protein kinase, yeast cells missegregate chromosomes severely and die within a single cell cycle. Furthermore, the inviability caused by a partial reduction in Ipl1 function can be rescued by perturbations that reduce type 1 protein phosphatase activity, thus suggesting that type 1 protein phosphatase acts in opposition to the Ipl1 protein kinase to insure the high fidelity of chromosome segregation in yeast cells. The purpose of this article is to describe some of our ongoing efforts to characterize Ipl1 and PP1 functions.

Aurora Kinases↗

The spindle checkpoint: a quality control mechanism which ensures accurate chromosome segregation.

The centromere defines where on a chromosome the kinetochores assemble. Kinetochores, large protein structures, mediate chromosome segregation during mitosis and meiosis by performing three key functions. Firstly, kinetochores attach chromosomes to the microtubule spindle apparatus. Secondly, kinetochores co-ordinate microtubule dynamics to allow chromosomes to move along the spindle. Lastly, kinetochores generate the 'wait' signal which prevents anaphase onset until all the chromosomes are correctly aligned on the spindle. This signal forms part of the spindle checkpoint mechanism, a highly conserved cell cycle checkpoint which maintains the accuracy of the chromosome segregation process. This article provides a brief historical overview before focusing on some of the outstanding issues and more recent developments in the field.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Suppressor analysis of a histone defect identifies a new function for the hda1 complex in chromosome segregation.

Histones are essential for the compaction of DNA into chromatin and therefore participate in all chromosomal functions. Specific mutations in HTA1, one of the two Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes encoding histone H2A, have been previously shown to cause chromosome segregation defects, including an increase in ploidy associated with altered pericentromeric chromatin structure, suggesting a role for histone H2A in kinetochore function. To identify proteins that may interact with histone H2A in the control of ploidy and chromosome segregation, we performed a genetic screen for suppressors of the increase-in-ploidy phenotype associated with one of the H2A mutations. We identified five genes, HHT1, MKS1, HDA1, HDA2, and HDA3, four of which encode proteins directly connected to chromatin function: histone H3 and each of the three subunits of the Hda1 histone deacetylase complex. Our results show that Hda3 has functions distinct from Hda2 and Hda1 and that it is required for normal chromosome segregation and cell cycle progression. In addition, HDA3 shows genetic interactions with kinetochore components, emphasizing a role in centromere function, and all three Hda proteins show association with centromeric DNA. These findings suggest that the Hda1 deacetylase complex affects histone function at the centromere and that Hda3 has a distinctive participation in chromosome segregation. Moreover, these suppressors provide the basis for future studies regarding histone function in chromosome segregation.

Alleles↗

DBF8, an essential gene required for efficient chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

To investigate chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we examined a collection of temperature-sensitive mutants that arrest as large-budded cells at restrictive temperatures (L. H. Johnston and A. P. Thomas, Mol. Gen. Genet. 186:439-444, 1982). We characterized dbf8, a mutation that causes cells to arrest with a 2c DNA content and a short spindle. DBF8 maps to chromosome IX near the centromere, and it encodes a 36-kDa protein that is essential for viability at all temperatures. Mutational analysis reveals that three dbf8 alleles are nonsense mutations affecting the carboxy-terminal third of the encoded protein. Since all of these mutations confer temperature sensitivity, it appears that the carboxyl-terminal third of the protein is essential only at a restrictive temperature. In support of this conclusion, an insertion of URA3 at the same position also confers a temperature-sensitive phenotype. Although they show no evidence of DNA damage, dbf8 mutants exhibit increased rates of chromosome loss and nondisjunction even at a permissive temperature. Taken together, our data suggest that Dbf8p plays an essential role in chromosome segregation.

ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters↗

Chromosome segregation: seeing is believing.

For chromosome segregation in mitosis, each centromere directs assembly of a complex, proteinaceous structure - the kinetochore, which connects the chromosome to microtubules of the mitotic spindle. A recent study has provided important new insights into the mechanism by which kinetochores capture spindle microtubules.

Chromosome Segregation↗

Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis of chromosome segregation and interchromosomal effect in spermatozoa of a reciprocal translocation t(9,10)(q11;p11.1) carrier.

A couple was referred for exploration of repetitive abortions. The man was found to be a carrier of a balanced reciprocal translocation t(9;10)(q11;p11.1). The meiotic segregation of chromosomes 9 and 10 was analysed in 5,157 spermatozoa from this translocation carrier and in 15,255 spermatozoa from three control donors using three-colour fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). The theoretical viability of the different segregation patterns was performed using the computer system HC Forum developed by the Department of Cytogenetics at the Grenoble University Medical School, La Tronche, France. A normal or balanced constitution was found in 56.25% of the analysed spermatozoa. The tertiary 3:1 segregation mode was the most frequently observed (14.37%). The frequencies of adjacent-1, adjacent-2 and 3:1 interchange modes were 12.85, 9.38 and 7.14% respectively. The cumulative frequency of non-viable imbalance was estimated at 20.91% according to the theorical viability of the different segregation patterns. Spermatozoa aneuploidy frequency was also evaluated for chromosomes X, Y and 18, and there was no evidence of interchromosomal effect in spermatozoa from the translocation carrier. FISH analysis of spermatozoa in combination with the viability theorical estimation of the different segregation patterns could be considered a useful tool for genetic counselling in carriers of reciprocal translocation.

Adult↗