Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Choledocholithiasis”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Choledocholithiasis is a major source of morbidity among patients undergoing cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones. There is no consensus on the best approach to diagnosing bile duct stones. We compared the safety, accuracy, diagnostic yield, and cost of EUS- and ERCP-based approaches. METHODS: Sixty-four consecutive pre- and post-cholecystectomy patients referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for suspected choledocholithiasis were prospectively evaluated in a blinded fashion. All were stratified into risk groups using predefined criteria. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and ERCP were sequentially performed by two endoscopists. RESULTS: The success rates of EUS and ERCP were 98% and 94%, respectively. The accuracy of EUS for diagnosing choledocholithiasis was 94%. EUS provided an additional or alternative diagnosis to bile duct stones in 21% of patients. The complication rate of EUS was significantly lower than diagnostic ERCP. An EUS-based strategy costs less than diagnostic ERCP in patients with low, moderate, or intermediate risk. CONCLUSIONS: EUS is comparably accurate, but safer and less costly than ERCP for evaluating patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. It is useful in patients with an increased risk of having common bile duct stones based on clinical criteria and those with contraindications for or prior unsuccessful ERCP. EUS may enable selective performance of ERCP and improve the cost-effectiveness of diagnosing choledocholithiasis.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.

AIM: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and trans-abdominal ultrasound in the detection of choledocholithiasis, and to compare bile duct stone characteristics using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), MRCP and ultrasound. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 191 consecutive patients referred for diagnostic ERCP, choledocholithiasis was diagnosed in 34 patients using direct cholangiography. The latter took the form of ERCP (n = 29), intraoperative cholangiography (n = 3) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (n = 2). All patients underwent MRCP and ultrasound examinations and their findings for choledocholitiasis were compared with those at direct cholangiography. Finally, in the 29 patients with choledocholithiasis diagnosed under ERCP, stone characteristics were compared across the three investigations of ERCP, MRCP and ultrasound. RESULTS: Compared with direct cholangiography, MRCP showed a sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 91%, 98% and 97%, respectively, in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. MRCP resulted in three false-negative and three false-positive findings, four of which occurred due to confusion with lesions at the ampulla. Ultrasound showed a sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 38%, 100% and 89%, respectively, in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. ERCP revealed a greater number of stones and these were more proximally distributed within the bile ducts when compared to MRCP. CONCLUSIONS: MRCP is highly accurate in the diagnosis of choloedocholithiasis and has the potential to replace diagnostic ERCP. MRCP underestimates the number of bile duct stones present.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Long-term follow-up of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis, and risk factors for recurrence.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: There have been growing concerns about the long-term sequelae of endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). The aims of the study were to evaluate the long-term clinical outcome of ES for choledocholithiasis and to identify the predictors of recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 529 patients (233 men, 296 women; mean age 63, range 9 - 88) who underwent successful ES for choledocholithiasis were evaluated. Follow-up data were obtained retrospectively. Statistical analyses were carried out for 334 patients who had a follow-up of at least 5 years or had recurrence. RESULTS: Immediate complications occurred in 37 patients (7 %). Follow-up data were available in 458 patients (86.6 %), of whom 280 (61.1 %) were asymptomatic, 127 (27.7 %) died from unrelated causes without recurrence, and 51 (11.1 %) had biliary symptoms and/or choledocholithiasis recurrence. Most recurrences (65 %) occurred more than 2 years following ES and were observed on multiple occasions in 13 patients (2.8 %). A bile duct diameter of 22 mm or greater was found to predict recurrence. Of 190 patients with an intact gallbladder, 11 (5.8 %) developed acute cholecystitis necessitating emergency cholecystectomy; all of these had previously documented gallstones. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis is found to be safe at long-term follow-up. A dilated bile duct (> or = 22 mm) is a marker for patients at increased risk of recurrence of symptoms and/or choledocholithiasis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

[Diagnostic and therapeutic management of symptomatic cholecystolithiasis and pre-operatively suspected choledocholithiasis].

The goal of this study was to examine the effectiveness of endoscopic retrograde choledocho-pancreatography (ERCP) at the Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin in the setting of pre-operative suspicion of choledocholithiasis. The predictive value of various pathologic findings with regard to choledocholithiasis was to be determined in this patient population.All patients treated operatively for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis between August 2000 and August 2001 were evaluated retrospectively for the following variables: age, gender, operative strategy, intra-operative cholangiography, sonographic findings, occurrence of choledocholithiasis. In 21.4 % of 196 patients who underwent cholecystectomy (n = 42) a pre-operative ERCP was performed. In 19 of these 42 patients, no pathology was found on ERCP. The percentage of therapeutic pre-operative investigations was 47.6 % (n = 20). In 3 patients, a juxtapapillary diverticulum was seen.69.9 % of the operations (n = 137) were performed laparoscopically. 167 patients (85.2 %) underwent intra-operative cholangiography. In 4 patients, the ERCP was performed post-operatively. The indication for 3 of those 4 examinations was an abnormal intra-operative cholangiogram. Complications occurred in 4 of the 46 patients who underwent ERCP (8.7 %). Choledocholithiasis was found in 12.2 % (n = 24) of all 196 patients. The pathologic finding with the highest positive predictive value for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis was the finding of a dilated common bile duct to more than 8 mm diameter (PPV 75 %). Among laboratory variables investigated in this study, the elevation of serum bilirubin level exhibited the highest positive predictive value (PPV 39.2 %).

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

[Cholangioscopy after successful treatment of complicated choledocholithiasis. Is stone free really stone free?].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: After successful percutaneous or endoscopic therapy of complicated choledocholithiasis (requiring more than one therapeutic intervention or lithotripsy), radiological visualization of the bile duct is the standard to determine if any stone fragments are left. It is unknown how often stone fragments, which might be the cause for another period of symptomatic choledocholithiasis, are missed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed cholangioscopy in 31 consecutive patients (age 42 - 85; 14 male, 17 female) with complicated choledocholithiasis after successful therapy when there were no stone fragments left radiographically. RESULTS: Cholangioscopy revealed retained stone fragments in four female patients. Two of these had a benign stricture of the common bile duct. CONCLUSIONS: Cholangioscopy after successful endoscopic or percutaneous therapy of complicated choledocholithiasis seems to be useful, because in bile ducts radiographically free of stones, cholangioscopy detects stone fragments in some patients. Further studies are needed to demonstrate if cholangioscopy can reduce the rate of symptomatic relapse after treatment of complicated choledocholithiasis.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with suspected choledocholithiasis underwent non-breath-hold, heavily T2-weighted, respiratory-triggered turbo spin-echo MR cholangiography. They then underwent ERC within 5 hours. The results of the two procedures were compared in 45 patients. RESULTS: The absence of ductal dilatation was shown in 16 patients at MR cholangiography and at ERC. MR cholangiography showed common duct dilatation in 28 of the 29 patients with dilatation shown at ERC. MR cholangiography helped correctly identify 18 of the 19 patients with choledocholithiasis and 22 of the 26 patients without choledocholithiasis. Sensitivity with MR cholangiography was 95%, specificity was 85%, positive predictive value was 82%, and negative predictive value was 96%. Two of the false-positive findings were due to pneumobilia. CONCLUSION: Non-breath-hold MR cholangiography is as accurate for the evaluation of choledocholithiasis as ERC.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with oral-contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to assess the performance of helical CT cholangiography after administration of an oral biliary contrast agent for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Helical CT cholangiography was performed on 31 patients referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography of suspected choledocholithiasis. Iopanoic acid (6 g) was administered orally 8-12 hr before acquisition of helical CT cholangiograms. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional reformations were generated from a set of axial source images. Two radiologists independently interpreted the helical CT cholangiograms. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using findings on retrograde cholangiography as the standard of reference. In addition, interobserver agreement was determined using kappa statistics. RESULTS: Our patients had no adverse reactions to iopanoic acid. The degree of biliary opacification was sufficient to perform three-dimensional and two-dimensional reconstructions in 29 patients (93.5%). Two patients were excluded from statistical analysis because cannulation of the common bile duct during retrograde cholangiography failed. Findings on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the remaining 29 patients were the following: choledocholithiasis (n = 14), common bile duct dilatation with no stones (n = 11), and normal bile ducts (n = 4). Sensitivity and specificity of oral-contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography for detection of choledocholithiasis were 92.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.1-99.8%) and 100% (95% CI, 78.2-100%), respectively, for observer 1 and 85.7% (95% CI, 57.2-98.2%) and 100% (95% CI, 78.2-100%), respectively, for observer 2. Interobserver agreement was .92 (excellent). CONCLUSION: Helical CT cholangiography performed after oral administration of iopanoic acid appears promising for diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

A prospective study of the safety of endoscopic therapy for choledocholithiasis in an outpatient population.

OBJECTIVE: Many centers routinely admit patients for observation after endoscopic therapy of choledocholithiasis although this is contrary to the current mandate for cost containment. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety, success, and complication rates of outpatient therapeutic ERCP in the management of choledocholithiasis. METHODS: Over a 4-month period, 97 consecutive outpatients undergoing endoscopic treatment for choledocholithiasis were enrolled in a prospective manner. Each subject was observed 1-3 h postprocedure before discharge with follow-up at 10 days. RESULTS: Successful endoscopic management of choledocholithiasis was achieved in 100% of patients. Complication rates were as follows: pancreatitis (2.1%), postsphincterotomy bleeding (3.2%), perforation (0%), and sepsis (0%). One patient required admission during the observation period, and two others with pancreatitis were readmitted within 24 h of discharge. There was no apparent adverse clinical outcome related to this policy. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic therapy of choledocholithiasis may be performed safely on an outpatient basis, realizing significant cost savings.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed2004

Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct in difficult choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: This review investigated the role played by laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct (LECBD) in the management of difficult choledocholithiasis. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed a prospective database of LECBD for difficult choledocholithiasis during the period 1995 to 2003. RESULTS: Of the 97 LECBDs performed in the authors' center from 1995 to 2003, 25 were performed for difficult choledocholithiasis. Difficult choledocholithiasis was defined as failure of endoscopic stone retrieval for the following reasons: access and cannulation difficulty, the difficult nature of common bile duct (CBD) stones, and the presence of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related complications. There were seven unsuccessful cannulations because of previous gastrectomy (n = 5) and periampullary diverticulum (n = 2). Among the 18 patients with failed endoscopic extraction, there were 10 impacted stones, 2 incomplete stone clearances after multiple attempts, 2 type 2 Mirizzi syndromes, 1 proximal stent migration, 1 repeated post-ERCP pancreatitis, 1 situs inversus, and 1 stricture at the distal common bile duct. There were 14 male and 11 female patients with a mean age of 67.8 +/- 15 years. Initial presentations included cholangitis (n = 14, 56%), biliary colic (n = 3, 12%), jaundice/deranged liver function ( n = 5, 20%), cholecystitis (n = 2, 8%), and pancreatitis (n = 1, 4%). Regarding the approach for LECBD, there were 2 transcystic duct explorations and 23 choledochotomies. The mean operative time was 149.4 +/- 49.3 min, and there were three conversions (12%). The stone clearance rate was 100%, and no recurrence was detected during a mean follow-up period of 16.8 months. Five complications were encountered, which included bile leak (3 patients) and wound infection (2 patients). When the results were compared with the remaining 72 LECBDs for nondifficult stones during the same period, the complication rate, conversion rate, and rate of residual stones were similar despite a longer operation time (149.4 +/- 49.4 min vs 121.6 +/- 50.5 min). CONCLUSION: When ERCP is impossible or stone retrieval is incomplete, LECBD is the solution to difficult CBD stones.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Management of choledocholithiasis: comparison between laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy.

AIM: Choledocholithiasis is present in 5 to 10 percent of patients who have cholelithiasis. In the area of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (IOES) have been used to treat choledocholithiasis. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and hospital costs of LCBDE with IOES. METHODS: Between November 1999 and October 2002, patients with choledocholithiasis undergoing LC plus LCBDE (Group A, n=45) were retrospectively compared to those undergoing LC plus IOES (Group B, n=57) at a single institution. RESULTS: Ductal stone clearance rates were equivalent for the two groups (88% versus 89%, P=0.436). The conversion rate was higher for Group B (8.8% versus 4.4%, P=0.381), as was the morbidity (12.3% versus 6.7%, P=0.336). There were no other significant differences between the two groups. The complications were mainly related to endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), and the hospital costs were significantly increased in this subset of Group B (median, 23,910 versus 14,955 RMB yuan, P=0.03). Although hospital stay was longer in Group A (median, 7 versus 6 days, P=0.041), the patients in Group A had a significantly decreased cost of hospitalization compared with those in Group B (median, 11,362 versus 15,466 RMB yuan, P=0.000). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate equivalent ductal stone clearance rates for the two groups. LCBDE management appears safer, and is associated with a significantly decreased hospital cost. The findings suggest LCBDE for choledocholithiasis is a better option.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

[Endoscopic biliary stents for the temporary management of choledocholithiasis].

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic extraction of biliary tract stones is safe and effective. When the procedure is not successful, the use of a temporary stent can be a solution. AIM: To prospectively analyze the usefulness of endoscopic biliary stents in the temporary management of biliary obstruction due to choledocholithiasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analysis of 51 consecutive patients (age range 21-88 years, 34 females) with common bile duct stones that, from January 1999 to December 2001, were subjected to an endoscopic insertion of a biliary stent. RESULTS: The indications for stent placement were a large stone in 40 patients (78%), the insecurity of a complete biliary tract cleaning in eight (16%) and technical difficulties in three (6%). Twenty seven patients (52.9%) were jaundiced and 17 (33.3%) had cholangitis. The prostheses remained in place until definitive resolution of the choledocholithiasis in 47 patients (92%) and migrated in 4 (8%). Bilirubin levels became normal in all cases with jaundice and infection resolved in all those with cholangitis. The definitive treatment of choledocholithiasis was done endoscopically in 28 patients (58%) and surgically in 20 (42%). Three patients were lost from follow up. Of these, one patient (2%) died 14 months later due to a recurrent cholangitis. The remaining two patients were asymptomatic and with the prostheses still in place 522 and 560 days post stent placement. CONCLUSIONS: When the immediate endoscopic resolution of choledocholithiasis is not possible, temporary stenting is a simple and safe therapeutic alternative that allows patients to be free of obstructive complications until the definitive treatment is carried out.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Comparative analysis of different methods in the treatment of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis].

In the patients with different forms of cholelithiasis 1988 operations were performed, 597 of them - on account of acute calculous cholecystitis. In 118 (19%) patients with acute calculous cholecystitis choledocholithiasis was diagnosed. All the patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 52 (44%) patients who have undergone conventional "open" operation with choledocholithotomy. Group 2 consisted of 66 (56%) patients treated with endoscopic techniques. In group 1 complications were seen in 4 (7.6%) patients, lethal outcome -- in 3 (5.7%), residual choledocholithiasis -- in 7 (13.4%). Mean hospital stay was 24.7 days. In group 2 complications were seen in 1 (2%) patient, residual choledocholithiasis -- in 1 (2%), there were no lethal outcomes. Mean hospital stay was 15.1 days. It is concluded that minimally invasive technologies in the treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis improve results of treatment and shorten hospital stay.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

A balanced approach to choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: We set out to review and evaluate the results of an algorithm for managing choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: We performed retrospective review of patients with choledocholithiasis at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) between March 1993 and August 1999. All patients were operated on under the direction of one surgeon (M.E.A), following a consistent algorithm that relies primarily on laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (TCCBDE) but uses laparoscopic choledochotomy (LCD) when the duct and stones are large or if the ductal anatomy is suboptimal for TCCBDE. Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy (ERS) is done if sphincterotomy is required to facilitate common bile duct exploration (CBDE). Postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is utilized when this fails. Preoperative ERCP is used only for high-risk patients. RESULTS: A total of 728 LC were performed, and there were 60 instances (8.2%) of choledocholithiasis. Primary procedures consisted of 47 TCCBDE; 37 of them required no other treatment. In five cases, the stones were flushed with no exploration. Intraoperative ERS was performed three times as the only form of duct exploration. LCD was utilized twice; one case also required intraoperative ERS, and the other had a postoperative ERCP for stent removal. One patient with small stones was observed, with no sequelae. Preoperative ERCP was done twice as the primary procedure. Of the 10 cases that were not completely cleared by TCCBDE, three had a postoperative ERCP and seven had an intraoperative ERS, one of which required a postoperative ERCP. There were three complications (6%) related to CBDE, with no long-term sequelae. There were four postoperative complications (6.7%) and no deaths. The mean number of procedures per patient was 1.12. The average postoperative hospital stay was 1.8 days (range, 0-14). CONCLUSIONS: Choledocholithiasis can be managed safely by laparoscopic techniques, augmenting with ERCP as necessary. This protocol minimizes the number of procedures and decreases the hospital stay.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by endoscopic ultrasonography.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasonography is a promising procedure for the diagnosis of extrahepatic cholestasis. Accuracy for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by ultrasonography and computed tomography were prospectively compared with endoscopic ultrasonography in 62 consecutive patients. METHODS: Final diagnosis was determined by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with or without sphincterotomy or intraoperative cholangiography with or without choledochoscopy. All of the patients had abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasonography, and either an endoscopic retrograde (n = 40) or intraoperative cholangiography (n = 32) performed. RESULTS: Choledocholithiasis was confirmed in 22 patients. Thirteen patients had a stone with a diameter < 1 cm, and 14 had a nonenlarged common bile duct. Endoscopic ultrasonography was more sensitive (97%) than ultrasonography (25%; P < 0.0001) and computed tomography (75%; P < 0.02). Specificity and positive predictive value were not significantly different. Negative predictive value of endoscopic ultrasonography (97%) was better than that of ultrasonography (56%; P < 0.0001) and computed tomography (78%; P < 0.02). Results were unchanged after six patients in whom the absence of choledocholithiasis was considered probable after follow-up were excluded. Endoscopic ultrasonography results did not depend on stone diameter or common bile duct dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic ultrasonography appears to be the best diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis compared with other noninvasive procedures.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Management of choledocholithiasis in the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: The best way to detect and manage common duct stones in conjunction with laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not agreed upon at the present time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our experience with choledocholithiasis in a consecutive series of 1,123 cholecystectomies (94% by laparoscopy) has been reviewed. Suspected duct stones were investigated preoperatively or postoperatively by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), and if necessary, duct clearance was attempted by endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). No attempt was made to identify choledocholithiasis intraoperatively. RESULTS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was performed in 11% of patients, and 32% of these required ES. The complication rate of ERC and ES was 8%, without mortality. Two patients required a second operation for missed choledocholithiasis, for a reoperation rate of 0.2%. CONCLUSION: We believe that primary or secondary open surgery is only occasionally necessary for the management of choledocholithiasis. Preoperative ERC and ES for suspected duct stones, with the same strategy employed as a salvage for stones presenting after cholecystectomy, was safe and efficient.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

The management of choledocholithiasis in children in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the procedure of choice for gallbladder removal in children, the treatment of children who have choledocholithiasis remains unclear. For adults who have suspected choledocholithiasis, preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a well-described and effective approach, however, its use for common bile duct stones in children has not been defined. The authors reviewed the records of 131 consecutive children undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy on two surgical services to define the efficacy of ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in managing choledocholithiasis in children. Fourteen children were suspected of having common duct stones noted on preoperative ultrasound scan and laboratory data. At ERCP, six children had no stones visualized; eight had stones and underwent stone extraction and sphincter dilation or sphincterotomy. All 14 underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy a mean of 3.8 days after ERCP. None of the 14 had evidence of retained stones. Only one of 117 children undergoing primary laparoscopic cholecystectomy had unsuspected common bile duct stones and was treated with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and stone removal. A management plan incorporating ERCP followed by early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and effective strategy for children who have choledocholithiasis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Microbiology of choledochal bile in patients with choledocholithiasis admitted to a tertiary hospital.

AIM: The present study was designed to investigate the microbiology of choledochal bile of patients with cholangitis and choledocholithiasis. METHODS: We identified and determined the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria isolated in the bile of patients with cholangitis and choledocholithiasis diagnosed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). RESULTS: Nineteen (82.6%) of 23 patients with choledocholithiasis had positive bile cultures. A single agent was detected in 11 patients (57.9%), while a mixed growth, with pathogens ranging from two to three species, were seen in eight patients (42.1%). Patients with clinical manifestations of cholangitis had significantly higher counts of colonies per mL of bile (> 105 cfu/mL). The predominant Gram-negative aerobic bacteria isolated were Escherichia coli (9, 31.0%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (5, 17.2%), Enterobacter cloacae (2, 6.9%), Pantoea agglomerans (1, 3.4%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1, 3.4%). The predominant Gram-positive bacteria were Enterococcus faecalis (5, 17.2%) and Streptococcus sp. (5, 17.2%). Bacteroides fragilis was isolated in one patient with mixed growth. All Gram-positive bacteria isolated in bile were sensitive to ampicillin, and all Gram-negative bacteria isolated were sensitive to gentamicin with a minimum inhibitory concentration (CIM90) ranging from 0.5 to 1.0- micro g/mL. Gram-negative bacteria were also sensitive to imipenem, fluorquinolones, second and third generation cephalosporins. Although all five isolates of E. faecalis were sensitive to ampicillin, two of five (40%) E. faecalis isolates demonstrated high levels of resistance to gentamicin. CONCLUSION: E. coli, K. pneumoniae, E. faecalis and Streptoccocus sp. were the most common bacteria isolated in the bile of patients with cholangitis and choledocholithiasis, which were sensitive to a simple therapeutic regimen, such as the combination of ampicilin and gentamicin.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

EUS for suspected choledocholithiasis: do benefits outweigh costs? A prospective, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study of the use of EUS to prevent unnecessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis has two aims: to evaluate the effectiveness, based on patient outcome, and the potential clinical and economic benefits of EUS. METHODS: A prospective series of 485 patients (202 men, 283 women; mean age 66.2 years, range 20-94 years) suspected to have choledocholithiasis based on clinical, biochemical, and cross-sectional imaging (US or CT) data underwent EUS. Positive EUS findings were confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with sphincterotomy and/or by surgery; negative findings were confirmed by clinical follow-up. An EUS result was considered a true negative if the patient was confirmed symptom-free with normal tests on follow-up of at least 6 months. The costs of EUS (procedure, days of hospitalization, any morbidity) were compared with the estimated costs of the endoscopic retrograde cholangiography avoided in patients with true-negative EUS findings. RESULTS: EUS findings were verified in 463 patients: EUS diagnosed choledocholithiasis in 239 (51.6%) and the absence of stones in 220 patients. In 4 patients (0.8%), EUS was incomplete. By sphincterotomy (209 patients), surgical bile duct exploration (39), percutaneous cholangiography (1 case in which EUS demonstrated a bile duct tumor), and follow-up (214), EUS diagnoses were confirmed as follows: 237 true-positive, 216 true-negative, 2 false-positive, 4 false-negative, 4 incomplete (sensitivity 98%, specificity 99%, positive predictive value 99%, negative predictive value 98%, accuracy 97%). In 214 (46%) patients, more invasive investigations of the bile duct were avoided. The mean cost for patients managed by the EUS-based strategy was ' 374.50 (-284.72), which was significantly less than the theoretical mean cost of ' 443.80 (p < 0.001) for patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm that EUS is highly reliable for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Its use offers considerable clinical and economic advantages by preventing inappropriate and more invasive evaluation of the bile duct.

Adult↗