Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Checklist”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

A preliminary meta-analysis of the child behavior checklist in pediatric bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: A possible explanation for the ongoing controversy surrounding pediatric bipolar disorder is that differences in assessment methodologies lead to conflicting results. One way to address methodological differences in assessment across studies is to use a single standardized assessment of psychopathology to calibrate the findings reported in different studies. To this end, we conducted a meta-analysis of several studies that have employed the Child Behavior Checklist in the assessment of children with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. METHODS: MEDLINE was searched for all publications that utilized the Child Behavior Checklist in addition to structured diagnostic interviews to assess pediatric bipolar disorder. Random effects models were used to calculate combined estimates of Child Behavior Checklist clinical subscales. RESULTS: Children with bipolar disorder had scaled scores of >70 in the Aggression, Attention Problems, and Anxious/Depressed subscales of the Child Behavior Checklist. The Child Behavior Checklist was useful in distinguishing bipolar from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder subjects. CONCLUSIONS: While there was a significant heterogeneity in estimates between studies, a consistent pattern of elevations in inattention/hyperactivity, depression/anxiety, and aggression was identified.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Reduction of time to definitive care in trauma patients: effectiveness of a new checklist system.

This study evaluated the feasibility of establishing a new trauma transfer checklist and assessed its impact on trauma-related interhospital transfers. A standard envelope with a printed checklist (N.E.W.S.) incorporating four key concepts in the care and transfer of trauma patients was used. A prospective comparison of consecutive interhospital trauma transfers to the major trauma service between July 1999-May 2000 (pre-N.E.W.S.) and August 2000-November 2000 (post-N.E.W.S.) was made. Changes in management satisfaction were assessed by a Likert scale (1=poor to 5=excellent). Pre-N.E.W.S., 88 trauma patients were transferred and 20 trauma transfers were recorded post-N.E.W.S. The time to definitive care pre-N.E.W.S. was 443+/-322 min, and 339+/-108 min (P=0.014) post-N.E.W.S. The time in the referring hospital was also reduced from 343+/-310 min pre-N.E.W.S. to 197+/-90 min post-N.E.W.S (P=0.0002). The checklist system prompted changes in the management of the trauma patient in 20% of the cases and there was a high level of satisfaction expressed by users of the checklist (4.6+/-0.7). The N.E.W.S. checklist is effective in facilitating the interhospital transfer of trauma patients by shortening the time to definitive care.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

[The validation of checklists for the inhalation technic for the pressurized cartridge and the Turbuhaler].

OBJECTIVE: To determine the intra- and interobserver validity and reliability of two checklists for inhalation technique with a pressurized inhaler (PI) and the Turbuhaler. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Transversal descriptive study performed at an urban health clinic in Gijón (Spain). Thirty-four patients, over 14 years of age but younger than 65, who used a PI and 35 who used a Turbuhaler were chosen randomly from among patients in our health clinic practice. The results obtained with each list by two observers were compared with those obtained by electronic monitors (test pattern). Each patient performed 3 inhalation maneuvers. RESULTS: Comparison with the test pattern showed that, between 35.2% and 47% of patients used the PI technique correctly, whereas 74.2% inhaled correctly using the Turbuhaler. The sensitivity of the PI checklist ranged from 62.5 to 91.6 and specificity ranged from 88.8 to 94.4. The sensitivity of the Turbuhaler checklist ranged from 50 to 76.9 specificity ranged from 66.6 to 88.8. Intra-observer agreement (Kappa index) was 0.62 to 0.74 for the PI checklist and between 0.77 and 0.81 for the Turbuhaler list. Interobserver agreement (Kappa index) was 0.68 to 0.81 for the PI list and 0.53 to 0.60 for the Turbuhaler list. CONCLUSIONS: The two checklists are valid instruments and offer good intra- and interobserver reliability, permitting easy identification of patients who perform the inhalation technique incorrectly.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1999

The needs assessment checklist: a clinical approach to measuring outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of the Needs Assessment and Goal Planning Programme used in the rehabilitation of people with spinal cord injuries. The Needs Assessment Programme incorporates a behavioural indicator rating scale to detail the individual's progress and rehabilitation needs. This can also be used to evaluate the outcome of the rehabilitation programme in general. The Needs Assessment Checklist (NAC) forms part of the programme and is a tool which is used to evaluate rehabilitation outcome. SETTING: A purpose built, national spinal injuries centre in the United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: 82 patients who had completed the Needs Assessment Checklist, both at the beginning and towards the end of the rehabilitative process. RESULTS: Independence, as measured by the Checklist, was significantly greater in all domains at the time of the second Needs Assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The Needs Assessment and Goal Planning Programme is successful in establishing greater client independence, whether assessed at a verbal or physical level. Team members have used the Needs Assessment Checklist as a behavioural indicator of rehabilitation outcome based on available standards of rehabilitative care. Further development of the Needs Assessment Checklist now needs to focus on establishing concurrent validity and test/retest reliability. The measure developed proved to be a useful, clinically relevant and patient friendly assessment of rehabilitation outcome.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1998

Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination.

PURPOSE: To compare the psychometric properties of checklists, global rating scales preceded by a checklist, and global rating scales alone in assessing surgery residents' performances on an OSCE-like technical skills examination. METHOD: In 1996, 53 general surgery residents with one to six years of postgraduate training participated in a performance-based examination of technical skills consisting of eight 15-minute stations (bench-model simulations of operative procedures in general surgery). Two qualified surgeons marked at each station, one using a task-specific checklist (C) and a subsequent global rating scale (Gc), the other using a global rating scale only (G). RESULTS: Interstation reliabilities measured by Cronbach's alpha were .79 for C, .89 for Gc, and .85 for G. A series of multiple regressions predicting level of training from test scores revealed an R2 of .584 for C alone, which increased to .711 when Gc was entered after (p < .001), and increased to .704 when G was entered after C (p < .001). However, R2 for Gc alone was .711, and for G alone was .704, neither of which changed when C was entered into the prediction (p > .10). The R2 for Gc and G predicting level of training (.725) was not significantly greater than that of either Gc or G alone. A very similar pattern of results was seen when C, Gc, and G were used to predict independent evaluations of the operative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Global rating scales scored by experts showed higher inter-station reliability, better construct validity, and better concurrent validity than did checklists. Further, the presence of the checklists did not improve the reliability or validity of the global rating scale over that of the global rating scale alone. These results suggest that global rating scales administered by experts are a more appropriate summative measure when assessing candidates on performance-based examinations.

Educational Measurement↗
PubMed1999

Global ratings of videotaped performance versus global ratings of actions recorded on checklists: a criterion for performance assessment with standardized patients.

PURPOSE: To test whether global ratings of checklists are a viable alternative to global ratings of actual clinical performance for use as a criterion for standardized-patient (SP) assessment. METHOD: Five faculty physicians independently observed and rated videotaped performances of 44 medical students on the seven SP cases that comprise the fourth-year assessment administered at The Morchand Center of Mount Sinai School of Medicine to students in the eight member schools in the New York City Consortium. A year later, the same panel of raters reviewed and rated checklists for the same 44 students on five of the same SP cases. RESULTS: The mean global ratings of clinical competence were higher with videotapes than checklists, whereas the mean global ratings of interpersonal and communication skills were lower with videotapes. The correlations for global ratings of clinical competence showed only moderate agreement between the videotape and checklist ratings; and for interpersonal and communication skills, the correlations were somewhat weaker. CONCLUSION: The results raise serious questions about the viability of global ratings of checklists as an alternative to ratings of observed clinical performance as a criterion for SP assessment.

Adult↗
PubMed1980

A revised checklist to obtain consent to treatment with medication.

A checklist to obtain patient consent for treatment with medication was developed by the author in 1976. The one-page form documents the process of obtaining consent from patients and certifies that the physician has discussed the benefits, side-effects, and risks of medication. A revised checklist now in use better equips the physician to deal with cases in which the patient's condition reduces his capacity to give fully informed, valid, and voluntary consent. On the checklist the physician assesses the patient's clinical condition as shock, denial, distress, dependency, or recovery and accordingly indicates the patient's capacity to give fully valid consent. The checklist procedure allows the physician to withhold certain information for good medical reasons. Like its predecessor, the revised checklist is thought to provide the physician with reasonable protection from prosecution and has been shown to enhance the therapeutic relationship when used properly.

Anxiety↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The reliability and validity of a symptom checklist for use in HIV infection: a preliminary analysis.

The aim of the study was to determine the reliability and validity of a self-report symptom checklist designed for use in HIV infection. One hundred and seventy-one gay men completed a 28-item symptom checklist which produces 3 dimensions: physical, cognitive and psychological. The validity of each dimension was examined by comparing scores on the checklist with indices of disease progression and previously validated psychological scales. People with more advanced HIV disease had higher scores on the physical and cognitive checklists, though the psychological scale was not related to disease stage. All the scales showed moderate correlations with measures of psychological health. Examination of individual item responses suggested that patients over-reported the presence of some symptoms. Although individual items should be interpreted with caution, the overall scores of the RSC are reliable and valid as measures of subjective health status in HIV infection. The importance of psychological factors in the reporting of symptoms suggests that symptom checklists should be interpreted in the light of adequate measures of psychological state.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Reproducibility and validity of a simple checklist-type questionnaire for food intake and dietary behavior.

BACKGROUND: A simple, reliable, and valid food questionnaire is needed in clinical dietary assessments, community health education, and multi-purpose epidemiologic studies to obtain a crude measure of dietary intake. METHODS: To assess the validity and reproducibility of a simple 4-point scale food intake and behavior checklist, it was compared to two 3-day weighed dietary records. The FBC was administered to 47 students of a dietician course and their parents (n = 94) over a 9-month interval to assess the reproducibility. The mean intakes of selected food groups assessed by the two dietary records completed between food intake and behavior checklists were compared to the responses to the food intake and behavior checklist to assess its validity. RESULTS: The kappa statistics for reproducibility ranged from 0.25 for confectionaries to 0.63 for a preference for fatty foods (median, 0.39). There was a reasonable level of correlation between the dietary record and the food intake and behavior checklist in the intake of eggs, milk, and fruits (r = 0.53, 0.56, and 0.50, respectively). There was a weaker but still significant correlation in the intake of vegetables, and alcohol (r = 0.31 and 0.45, respectively). No significant correlation was observed in the intake of meat, fish, confectionaries, and soft drinks. However, those who reported consuming mainly fish rather than meat were found to eat significantly less meat and animal fat. Similarly, those who did not prefer fatty foods consumed significantly less meat, animal fat, and polyunsaturated fatty acids. CONCLUSIONS: This simple food checklist was useful in collecting data on egg, milk, and fruit consumption. Assessing intake frequency of vegetables, meat or fish with the FBC may be useful in screening high- or low-intake individuals.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Validity of the Amsterdam Child Behavior Checklist: a short rating scale for children.

The Amsterdam Child Behavior Checklist is a short behavior checklist meant to distinguish between attention problems and several other common behavioral and emotional problems of children in primary education. The list has four scales, Attention Behavior, Restlessness, Aggressive Behavior, and Fear/Uncertainty. We examined the relationships among the scores on the scales and similar scales of the Teacher Report Form, the teachers' version of the Child Behavior Checklist. Teachers from 94 schools rated 454 children on both lists. Analysis showed that the associations between the scores of the scales of the Amsterdam Child Behavior Checklist and of similar scales of the Teacher Report Form ranged from moderate to strong. These data support the validity of the scales of the Amsterdam Child Behavior Checklist.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗
PubMed2002

Use of a standardised checklist to assess peripheral sputum smear microscopy laboratories for tuberculosis diagnosis in Uganda.

SETTING: TB diagnostic units in Uganda. OBJECTIVES: To assess and improve the supervision and performance of sputum smear microscopy in the peripheral diagnostic units in Uganda using a standardised laboratory checklist. DESIGN: A standardised checklist was developed and used during the quarterly supervisory visits of the District TB and Leprosy Supervisors for five quarters from the fourth quarter of 1997 until the last quarter of 1998. Individual peripheral laboratory performance was monitored during the study period. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 304 TB diagnostic units in six of the 45 Ugandan Districts were supervised using the checklist. A total of 208 checklists were analysed. The situational analysis of the peripheral diagnostic units at the beginning and at the end of the study showed a marked improvement in laboratory performance in all aspects related to sputum smear microscopy. Individual laboratory performance was monitored over five quarters, and timely response to shortcomings was provided. CONCLUSION: The systematic use of a standardised laboratory checklist can be considered an important step forward in improving the performance of the peripheral laboratories in Uganda through on-the-spot correction of any identified shortcomings.

Bacteriological Techniques↗
PubMed1978

Checklist of perceptual-motor and language skills for developmentally handicapped preschoolers.

This report describes the development of a checklist of perceptual-motor and language skills which has been designed to identify specific skills and to estimate acquisition of skill in 21 developmentally delayed preschoolers. The preschoolers were administered the checklist at the beginning and end of the school year. Significant mean differences between early and late total checklist scores were obtained. The correlation between early and late total checklist scores was .97. The chief advantages of this checklist are the specificity of assessment and the ease with which it may be used by professionals and paraprofessionals.

Art↗
PubMed1998

Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the reliability of a new 7-point checklist based on simplified epiluminescence microscopy (ELM) pattern analysis with the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and standard pattern analysis for the diagnosis of clinically doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. DESIGN: In a blind study, ELM images of 342 histologically proven melanocytic skin lesions were evaluated for the presence of 7 standard criteria that we called the "ELM 7-point checklist." For each lesion, "overall" and "ABCD scored" diagnoses were recorded. From a training set of 57 melanomas and 139 atypical nonmelanomas, odds ratios were calculated to create a simple diagnostic model based on identification of major and minor criteria for the "7-point scored" diagnosis. A test set of 60 melanomas and 86 atypical nonmelanomas was used for model validation and was then presented to 2 less experienced ELM observers, who recorded the ABCD and 7-point scored diagnoses. SETTINGS: University medical centers. PATIENTS: A sample of patients with excised melanocytic lesions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the models for diagnosing melanoma. RESULTS: From the total combined sets, the 7-point checklist gave a sensitivity of 95% and a sepcificity of 75% compared with 85% sensitivity and 66% specificity using the ABCD rule and 91% sensitivity and 90% specificity using standard pattern analysis (overall ELM diagnosis). Compared with the ABCD rule, the 7-point method allowed less experienced observers to obtain higher diagnostic accuracy values. CONCLUSIONS: The ELM 7-point checklist provides a simplification of standard pattern analysis because of the low number of features to identify and the scoring diagnostic system. As with the ABCD rule, it can be easily learned and easily applied and has proven to be reliable in diagnosing melanoma.

Humans↗
PubMed1997

Adequacy of interviews vs checklists for classifying childhood psychiatric disorder based on parent reports.

BACKGROUND: The advantages and disadvantages of lay-administered structured interviews and self-administered problem checklists for estimating prevalence and associated features of childhood psychiatric disorder have attracted little comment. This article compares the scientific adequacy of these 2 instruments for classifying DSM-III-R categories of childhood psychiatric disorder in general population samples. METHODS: Study data are from parental assessments of 251 children aged 6 to 16 years participating in a 2-stage measurement evaluation study. Reliability and validity were compared between the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (the structured interview in the study) and the revised Ontario Child Health Study scales (the self-administered problem checklist used in the study). RESULTS: Reliability estimates based on the kappa statistic were comparable for the 2 instruments and ranged from 0.21 (conduct disorder) to 0.70 (depression) on the lay interview and from 0.17 (depression) to 0.61 (oppositional defiant disorder) on the self-administered checklist. Validity coefficients tended to favor the checklist categories, but only marginally. CONCLUSIONS: On balance, differences in reliability and validity were small between the 2 instruments. These differences would appear to have no discernible impact on the knowledge about prevalence and associated features of disorder generated by use of such instruments in general population surveys.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1979

Normative and validity data for the Missouri Children's Behavior Checklist.

Presented normative data, collected on an unselected sample of 302 7- and 9-year-old children, for the Missouri Children's Behavior Checklist. Boys were found to be rated as more deviant than girls, while age, occupation of head of household, and estimated IQ were found to be unrelated to checklist ratings of deviant behavior. The use of a cutting point on the Total Pathology Scale of the checklist derived from the normative data identified a group of clinic children, 89% of whom were found to be in need of professional attention. The potential usefulness of the checklist as an aid in making important clinical decisions is discussed, as is the need for more extensive normative data.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Cognitive impairment in depressed outpatients as measured with the Dementia Checklist: a simple method for primary care and in field research.

The Dementia Checklist is a 12-item dementia rating scale for physicians who, for whatever reason, cannot be specifically trained. It addresses symptoms of cognitive decline that can easily be identified, and that are typical for different stages of cognitive impairment. This allows an easy classification of the severity of dementia. In a first study, the dementia checklist was used in 937 geriatric outpatients who were treated by neuropsychiatrists for depression. All items contribute to the accuracy of measurement (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84). Differences in cognitive impairment depending on age (chi 2 = 51.7; p < or = 0.001) and depression (chi 2 = 47.6; p < or = 0.001) indicate external validity of the dementia checklist and 5.7% of the outpatients were rated as demented. The Dementia Checklist provides a very economical and easy-to-use assessment of cognitive decline.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1984

Convergence of clinically derived diagnoses and parent checklists among inpatient children.

The extent to which parent rating scales differentiated children according to DSM III diagnoses was examined. A total of 113 psychiatric inpatient boys (ages 6-11) were rated by their mothers or maternal figures on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Behavior Problem Checklist (BPC). Children with DSM III diagnoses of conduct disorder or depression were compared to children without these diagnoses. Externalizing and internalizing scales of the parent checklists and additional measures of child aggression and depression differentiated children according to major diagnoses. The use of parent checklists to classify children indicated a high level of sensitivity for CBCL and BPC scales for diagnosing conduct disorder and depression. However, specificity of the subscales, particularly for the CBCL, was relatively low, indicating a high rate of false positives. The need for further work that extends the range of diagnosis, that examines subtypes of disorders, and that increases the specificity of the measures for diagnostic purposes is discussed.

Aggression↗
PubMed1988

Methodological considerations in the evaluation of the convergence of psychiatric diagnoses and parent-informant checklists.

Psychiatric diagnoses and objective parent checklists are alternative ways to describe child adjustment problems. There has recently been interest in evaluating the degree of agreement or convergence between these sources of information. This paper addresses three issues neglected by researchers in this area. The appropriateness of the use of indices of sensitivity and specificity to describe the correspondence of diagnoses and checklist scores is questioned. Implications of failure to consider the reliability of diagnoses in interpreting diagnosis-checklist agreement are discussed. Also, possible parameters of diagnosis-checklist agreement that should be identified by researchers are reviewed. Suggestions for improving research in this area are offered.

Child↗