Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Capsule Endoscopy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

The role of simeticone in small-bowel preparation for capsule endoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Capsule endoscopy is a new diagnostic method allowing painless visualization of the entire small bowel. However, there is as yet no standardized protocol for bowel preparation before the examination. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of simeticone in reducing bowel gas bubbles in patients undergoing capsule endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized, prospective, and controlled study was conducted, including 56 patients, from March to October 2004. The patients were randomly allocated to groups receiving either simeticone or no simeticone, on the basis of a computer-generated random number table. Patients in the simeticone group (n = 28) received 300 mg simeticone for bowel preparation 20 min before capsule endoscopy, while patients in the non-simeticone group (n = 28) received no medication for bowel preparation. Two experienced endoscopists assessed and graded the visibility of the mucosa and intraluminal gas bubbles in a single-blinded fashion. RESULTS: The visibility of the mucosa in the proximal small bowel in patients who received preparation with simeticone was considered to be better, with fewer intraluminal bubbles, than in those without bowel preparation ( P < 0.025). Interobserver agreement was excellent ( R > or = 0.8, P < 0.05). No adverse effects of simeticone were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Simeticone administration before capsule endoscopy improves the visualization of the mucosa in the proximal small intestine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Capsule endoscopy: current indications and future prospects.

Capsule endoscopy represents a significant advance in the investigation of small bowel diseases and the beginning of wireless endoscopic imaging. Capsule endoscopy involves swallowing a video capsule endoscope, which is painless and relatively safe. Its use has been established for suspected small bowel bleeding, and the role of capsule endoscopy in the investigation of inflammatory bowel disease, iatrogenic disease, polyposis syndromes and coeliac disease is evolving. It is likely that in many instances it will become the next test after standard endoscopic evaluation. Early data suggest that capsule endoscopy improves outcome in patients with suspected small bowel bleeding, but more data are required on outcomes for the other indications.

Endoscopes↗
PubMed2003

Clinical utility, safety and tolerability of capsule endoscopy in urban Southeast Asian population.

AIM: Capsule endoscopy has demonstrated its clinical utility in the evaluation of small bowel pathology in several Western studies. In this prospective study, we aimed to determine the clinical utility, safety and tolerability of capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected small bowel disease in an urban Southeast Asian population. METHODS: We used the given (M2A) capsule endoscopy system in 16 consecutive patients with suspected small bowel pathology. In 9 patients the indication was obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, while in 6 patients it was to determine the extent of small bowel involvement in Crohn's disease. One patient underwent capsule endoscopy for evaluation of chronic abdominal pain. Patient's tolerability to the procedure was evaluated by standardized questionnaires and all patients were reviewed at one week to ensure that the capsule had been excreted without any adverse events. RESULTS: Abnormal findings were present in 8 patients (50%). The cause of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding was determined in 5 out of 9 patients. Findings included 2 cases of angiodysplasia, 2 cases of jejunal ulcers and 1 case of both angiodysplasia and jejunal ulcer. One patient had small bowel erosions and foci of erythema of doubtful significance. Ileal lesions were diagnosed in 2 out of 6 patients with Crohn's disease. Capsule endoscopy was well tolerated by all patients. One patient with Crohn's disease had a complication of capsule retention due to terminal ileum stricture. The capsule eventually passed out spontaneously after 1 month. CONCLUSION: Our study, which represented the first Asian series, further confirms the diagnostic utility, safety and tolerability of wireless capsule endoscopy.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Interference between pacemaker and video capsule endoscopy.

The wireless capsule video endoscopy is useful in patients with occult blood loss, but is contraindicated in patients with cardiac pacemaker (PM). No case of interference has been published. We report the case of a patient with a PM implanted in the abdominal wall. After capsule ingestion, cardiac monitoring showed no modification of the PM compartment (VOO, unipolar mode) but the capsule recording reveal more than 3 hours of loss of image. The wireless capsule endoscopy is safe in patients with PMs in VOO mode. Nevertheless important interference was noted in the recording when the capsule was near the PM.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

A prospective two-center study comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with intraoperative enteroscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy enables noninvasive diagnostic examination of the entire small intestine. However, sensitivity and specificity of capsule endoscopy have not been adequately defined. We, therefore, compared capsule endoscopy by using intraoperative enteroscopy as a criterion standard in patients with obscure GI bleeding. METHODS: Forty-seven consecutive patients with obscure GI bleeding (11 with ongoing overt bleeding, 24 with previous overt bleeding, and 12 with obscure-occult bleeding) from two German gastroenterologic centers were included. All patients who had a prior nondiagnostic evaluation, including upper endoscopy, colonoscopy with a retrograde examination of the distal ileum, and push enteroscopy, underwent capsule endoscopy followed by intraoperative enteroscopy. RESULTS: Capsule endoscopy identified lesions in 100% of the patients with ongoing overt bleeding, 67% of the patients with previous overt bleeding, and 67% of the patients with obscure-occult bleeding. Angiectasias were the most common source of bleeding (n = 22). Capsule endoscopy showed the source of bleeding in 74.4% of all patients. The method was more effective in patients with ongoing bleeding. Compared with intraoperative enteroscopy sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of capsule endoscopy were 95%, 75%, 95%, and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy has high sensitivity and specificity to detect a bleeding source in patients with obscure GI bleeding. Thus, wireless capsule endoscopy can be recommended as part of the routine work-up in patients with obscure GI bleeding.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Clinical outcome of patients examined by capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy has a greater diagnostic yield than radiology for detecting subtle inflammatory changes of the small bowel mucosa, but the clinical significance of these abnormalities is still uncertain because of the lack of long-term follow-ups. AIM AND METHODS: To verify the accuracy of capsule endoscopy in a cohort of patients with suspected Crohn's disease of the small bowel, taking as 'gold standard' the final diagnosis made after a long follow-up. From April 2002 to March 2005, we enrolled and examined by capsule endoscopy 27 consecutive patients with abdominal pain and diarrhea lasting more than 3 months and at least one of the following: anaemia, weight loss, fever, extra-intestinal manifestation(s) of inflammatory bowel disease. All patients already had an unremarkable pan-endoscopy, serology for celiac disease and intestinal radiology inconclusive for small bowel abnormality. On the basis of capsule endoscopy findings, patients were distributed in three groups; Group A had severe stricturing lesions requiring surgery; Group B, moderate inflammatory lesions further investigated invasively; Group C, minimal inflammatory changes or normal findings, clinically observed every 3 months (median 21 months, range 15-29). RESULTS: Small bowel inflammatory lesions were found in 16 of the 27 patients (diagnostic yield 59%). Three had surgery (Group A) and Crohn's disease was confirmed in two; the remainder had ileal adenocarcinoma in a pathological context of chronic inflammation. Crohn's disease was histologically confirmed in four of the five patients in Group B. Group C comprised 19 patients; Crohn's disease was confirmed in seven out of eight with positive capsule endoscopy, while only one of the patients with normal findings later developed overt ileal Crohn's disease. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio were, respectively, 93%, 84%, 5.8 and 0.08. Assuming a 50% pre-test probability of disease, capsule endoscopy gave a post-test probability of 85%. CONCLUSIONS: In our selected cohort, capsule endoscopy was highly sensitive in detecting small bowel inflammatory changes, enhancing by nearly 35% the pre-test probability of structural small bowel disease. Focal erythema and luminal debris may limit the specificity of capsule endoscopy.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Locally advanced small-bowel adenocarcinoma missed primarily by capsule endoscopy but diagnosed by push enteroscopy.

Wireless-capsule-endoscopy is a new painless method that is able both to visualize the entire small bowel and to detect even small lesions. We report here the case of a patient in whom a locally advanced small-bowel adenocarcinoma was initially missed on capsule endoscopy, but was diagnosed by subsequent push enteroscopy. Capsule endoscopy was carried out in a 47-year-old patient with a history of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, iron-deficiency anemia, and a lack of symptoms suggestive of stenosis. The capsule imaging revealed angiodysplasias in the jejunum, but no other abnormalities. Push enteroscopy was carried out to allow argon plasma coagulation treatment of the angiodysplasias that had been detected; it revealed a polypoid tumor 20 mm in diameter at 150 cm from the incisors, with the capsule endoscope still located proximal to the tumor and with its optical dome turned towards the push enteroscope. Clinical staging and subsequent surgical resection showed a locally advanced adenocarcinoma (pT4, pN0 (0/7), pMx, G3).[nl]Small-bowel tumors within the reach of push enteroscopy may be missed by capsule endoscopy. Although wireless capsule endoscopy is a major advance in the investigation of the small bowel, well-designed clinical studies still need to define the precise algorithm for diagnostic work-up of suspected small-bowel diseases.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

A prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy and push enteroscopy in patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy is used to investigate the small bowel in patients with GI bleeding of obscure etiology. Capsule endoscopy was compared prospectively with push enteroscopy in 20 patients with GI hemorrhage. METHODS: Twenty patients (8 men, 12 women; mean age 65.5 years, range 38-80 years) were enrolled in the study. All had undergone non-diagnostic EGD, colonoscopy, and barium contrast radiography of the small bowel. All patients underwent capsule endoscopy followed by push enteroscopy. The physician performing the enteroscopy (senior endoscopist) interpreted the capsule endoscopy in an unblinded manner, while a second blinded reviewer (endoscopy fellow) interpreted the capsule endoscopy to establish interinterpreter reliability. RESULTS: There was complete agreement between the blinded and the unblinded physicians in 18 of 20 cases; minor disparities were noted in the remaining two cases. In the small bowel, capsule endoscopy identified positive findings in 14 (70%) patients, whereas, push enteroscopy identified positive findings in 5 (25%) patients. Despite these results, the findings were definitive in only 6 of the 20 patients by using capsule endoscopy, and in two of 20 patients with push enteroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: When strict standards of interpretation were used, capsule endoscopy resulted in more positive findings than push enteroscopy, but the number of definitive findings for both imaging methods was low. There was a high degree of reliability between a novice and an experienced endoscopist with respect to the interpretation of capsule endoscopy.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Simethicone for small bowel preparation for capsule endoscopy: a systematic, single-blinded, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy is a new imaging method for visualization of the entire small bowel. However, no standardized protocol for bowel preparation for capsule endoscopy has been evaluated. METHODS: Capsule endoscopy was performed in 36 consecutive patients, all of whom fasted for 12 hours before ingestion of the capsule. Before capsule endoscopy, 18 patients received 80 mg simethicone and 18 had no supplemental medication for bowel preparation. Two observers, both experienced endoscopists, independently reviewed the examinations in a single-blinded and randomly assigned fashion. Mucosal visibility and intraluminal gas bubbles were assessed and graded by both observers. RESULTS: Bowel preparation with simethicone resulted in significantly better visibility because of fewer intraluminal bubbles (p<0.01). Interobserver agreement was excellent (r>/=0.8; k 0.78: 95% CI[0.57, 0.98] ). No adverse effect of simethicone was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Simethicone may be added to the routine preparation for capsule endoscopy to improve the visibility of small bowel mucosa.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Wireless capsule endoscopy: experience in a tropical country.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Capsule endoscopy is fast becoming the procedure of choice for small bowel imaging, especially to investigate the cause of unexplained gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. We report our experience with capsule endoscopy in 24 cases with various indications. METHODS: In patients with unexplained GI bleeding or chronic anemia, the cause could be established in nine of 12 cases (75%), which included angioectasiae, leiomyomata and parasitic infestation. RESULTS: The yield of capsule endoscopy was highest in patients presenting with chronic diarrhea and suspicion of small bowel mucosal disease, where Crohn's disease and tuberculosis could be diagnosed. However, in patients with unexplained abdominal pain, capsule endoscopy was found to be least useful because 5/7 patients in the study were normal, emphasizing the importance of case selection. Overall, capsule endoscopy yielded a positive diagnosis in 16 of the 24 cases (66.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The experience of capsule endoscopy in a tropical clinical setting is no different from elsewhere, although certain conditions like worm infestation are more likely to be detected in this environment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

[Evaluation of diagnostic yield and clinical impact of capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding].

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The major indication of small bowel capsule endoscopy is the diagnostics of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. The present retrospective study was aimed to analyze the diagnostic yield, positive and negative predictive values and clinical impact of capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 36 month period at two workplaces 66 capsule endoscopy studies were performed in 62 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding who had undergone non-diagnostic upper endoscopy and colonoscopy. Capsule video recordings were evaluated by two investigators at both workplaces. Capsule endoscopy findings were divided into 3 groups according to the bleeding source: definitive bleeding source (48 patients), uncertain bleeding potential (5 patients), and negative finding (8 patient). Patients after capsule endoscopy were followed-up until a mean of 20 (1-41) months. RESULTS: A definitive small bowel bleeding source was detected in 78.7% of the cases studied by capsule endoscopy. Definitive bleeding sources included angiodysplasia (28 cases), small bowel Crohn's disease (5 cases), small bowel tumor (5 cases), small bowel stenosis (2 cases), NSAID therapy related ulcer (1 case), non-specific inflammation (1 case) and helminthiasis (1 case) respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of capsule endoscopy studies were 95.8% and 84.6% respectively. In cases with definitive bleeding sources 72% of patients received therapy in accordance with capsule endoscopy findings (surgery in 18 patients, medical treatment modification in 16 patients, chemoembolisation in 1 patient). During the follow-up period 17.7% of the patients had rebleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy is a useful and effective diagnostic method in cases with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Effective therapy may be introduced in accordance with the majority of positive capsule endoscopy results.

Angiodysplasia↗
PubMed2006

[Capsule endoscopy--the past, presence, and future].

Wireless capsule endoscopy is a safe non-invasive method for the examination of the small intestine and terminal oesophagus. Examination is well tolerated by most of the patients. Due to the possibility to assess mucosa of the small intestine in details, capsule endoscopy has the diagnostical yield higher than other available methods. It is effective namely for study of obscure bleeding, celiac disease and Crohn's disease. Capsule endoscopy is aimed at the longterm follow up of patients with Barrett's oesophagus, however, the costs are higher than using gastroscopy. Capsule retention represents the most serious and practically the only complication of the examination which frequently requires surgical treatment. The future of capsule endoscopy depends on the next development of the technology.

Capsules↗
PubMed2003

Capsule endoscopy versus push enteroscopy in patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Wireless capsule endoscopy is a new method enabling non-invasive diagnostic endoscopy of the entire small intestine. In this study we prospectively examined the diagnostic precision of capsule endoscopy compared with push enteroscopy in patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS: Between July 2001 and October 2002 we examined 48 patients with suspected disorders of the small intestine using capsule endoscopy. 33 patients with obscure bleeding (19 men, 14 women, mean age 58 +/- 23 years) were prospectively examined using capsule endoscopy and push enteroscopy. RESULTS: On average, the patients had been suffering from chronic gastrointestinal bleeding for 30 +/- 36 (1-120) months. The lowest haemoglobin level was 6.5 +/- 1.6 g/dl (2.3-9.6) and on average 9 +/- 10 (0-50) blood units were transfused. Each patient underwent 4 +/- 2 (1-10) hospitalisations, with a mean 9 +/- 4 (5-17) diagnostic procedures before capsule endoscopy was used. Definitive bleeding sites were diagnosed by push enteroscopy in 7 patients (angiodysplasia [n = 5], ulcers [n = 1], multiple jejunal diverticula [n = 1]). Capsule endoscopy showed a bleeding source in 25 cases (76 %) (angiodysplasias [n = 15], Meckel's diverticulum [n = 1], ulcers [n = 7], ileum diverticulosis [n = 1], B-cell lymphoma [n = 1]). Push enteroscopy localised an additional bleeding source in comparison with capsule endoscopy (multiple jejunal diverticula) in one patient. Both methods of examination were safe and showed no complications. DISCUSSION: The present study shows that capsule endoscopy had the highest diagnostic yield and was superior to push enteroscopy in patients with chronic gastrointestinal bleeding. By using the capsule at an early stage the subsequent therapeutic procedure could be considerably shortened and diagnostic processes could possibly be optimised.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Review article: The advent of capsule endoscopy--a not-so-futuristic approach to obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

Capsule endoscopy is a new, wireless, endoscopic examination of the small intestine. To date, two small clinical trials have been reported utilizing capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, and have shown its superiority to push enteroscopy in diagnosing the cause of blood loss. No outcome studies have been reported. This paper proposes a change in practice guidelines for obscure bleeding. It is our opinion that, in the future, with the advent of wireless capsule endoscopy, the evaluation of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding will be very different from the practice of medicine today. We believe that capsule endoscopy will become the first-line method for the evaluation of patients with obscure bleeding, once upper endoscopy and colonoscopy have been shown to be negative. In patients with active bleeding, capsule endoscopy will confirm the small bowel as the site of bleeding, providing a location, or, if the study is negative for the small intestine, may indicate that the bleeding is either colonic or gastric in origin. In a patient with active bleeding within the small intestine, the capsule will guide further evaluation and therapy. A patient with a small bowel tumour detected by capsule endoscopy will proceed directly to laparoscopic surgery. If the site of bleeding is identified in the proximal small bowel and there is no mass, push enteroscopy will be used to re-identify the site and cauterize it. A distal small bowel site will require surgical intervention, coupled with intra-operative enteroscopy. Should the patient be too sick to undergo surgery, medical therapy utilizing hormonal agents will be considered. A colonic site will be evaluated by colonoscopy. In patients with a more occult or intermittent type of bleeding and in those whose upper endoscopies and colonoscopies are negative, capsule endoscopy will be used similarly to identify a bleeding lesion and thereby direct subsequent testing or treatment.

Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal↗
PubMed2004

Frequency and clinical outcome of capsule retention during capsule endoscopy for GI bleeding of obscure origin.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy is now commonly performed for GI bleeding of obscure origin. Regional transit abnormality refers to slowed capsule movement during capsule endoscopy. The frequency and clinical outcome of capsule retention and regional transit abnormalities are unknown. METHODS: Initial capsule endoscopies performed at a single institution in 52 patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin were reviewed retrospectively. For patients with capsule retention or regional transit abnormality, preprocedural characteristics, and post-procedural outcomes were recorded. OBSERVATIONS: Capsule retention occurred in 7 patients, all of whom remained asymptomatic. Regional transit abnormality was noted in 3 patients. Sources of bleeding were localized in all cases. Seven patients underwent surgery. Stricture induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was the major cause of retention. In all patients, anemia resolved during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule retention and regional transit abnormality occurred in almost 20% of patients who had capsule endoscopy for GI bleeding of obscure origin. These capsule movement abnormalities led to the diagnosis of bleeding sources and thereby influenced patient management. A history of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use may be associated with an increased risk of capsule retention.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Capsule endoscopy: where are we after 6 years of clinical use?

Capsule endoscopy has revolutionised the management of digestive tract diseases by providing a new non-invasive way to view the entire small bowel mucosa directly. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding is the primary and best validated indication to capsule endoscopy, which when used as first-line exploration is the most efficient strategy as regards diagnosis. In these patients, the technique is also helpful for effective decision-making concerning subsequent treatments. There is significant uncertainty regarding the role of capsule endoscopy in patients with Crohn's disease. Although it is clearly more sensitive than conventional imaging modalities, the implications of the lesions identified with this technique are not fully understood. Further prospective studies are required to identify the clinical settings where capsule endoscopy is most effective in these patients. Capsule endoscopy may potentially lead to diagnosis of small bowel tumours earlier in their course; it should be used as first-line surveillance procedure in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, and it may be of clinical value in selected patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Although preliminary results are promising, additional research is necessary to determine its role in the diagnosis and management of coeliac disease, as well as for the diagnosis of oesophageal and large bowel disorders. Well-designed studies are also needed to better define the impact of capsule endoscopy on health care use and clinical outcome of patients with intestinal diseases.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2002

Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected small intestinal bleeding: Results of a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: A video capsule has been developed to acquire photographic images of the small intestine during normal peristaltic motion. METHODS: Patients between 21 and 80 years of age referred for enteroscopy because of obscure GI bleeding were offered entry into a trial in which they would undergo both capsule endoscopy and subsequent push enteroscopy. Results of capsule examinations were compared with push enteroscopy findings. Capsule endoscopy was performed with the Given M2A video capsule system. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (12 women, 9 men, average age 61 years) were enrolled, all of whom completed the study. A bleeding site was found in 11 of 20 patients during capsule endoscopy. No additional intestinal diagnoses were made by enteroscopy. The yield of push enteroscopy in the evaluation of obscure bleeding was 30% (6/20), the yield of capsule endoscopy 55% (11/20). This difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0625). Capsule endoscopy found a distal source of bleeding in 5 of 14 patients who had normal push enteroscopic examinations. Patients preferred capsule endoscopy to enteroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates that capsule endoscopy provides excellent visualization of the small intestine, is well tolerated by patients, and is safe. Capsule endoscopy identified small intestinal bleeding sites beyond the range of push enteroscopy.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Capsule endoscopy in 2005: facts and perspectives.

Capsule endoscopy has recently been introduced to explore endoscopically the whole small intestine, fulfilling a gap between examinations of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. The technique consists of a miniaturized endoscope, embedded in a swallowable capsule that is propulsed by peristalsis and achieves the journey to the right colon in five to eight hours. Images captured by the capsule are recorded on a hard drive worn in a belt by the patient. The main indication for capsule examination is the examination of the small bowel to find a bleeding lesion in patients with obscure bleeding. Several studies have shown that the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy is superior to that of push enteroscopy in this indication. Other possible indications are patients with suspected intestinal location of Crohn's disease, familial adenomatous polyposis, complicated coeliac disease and lesions due NSAIDs. The review contains information on the technical aspects of capsule endoscopy and discusses the indications. Issues of safety and tolerance are also discussed.

Capsules↗