SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “CHOLECYSTECTOMY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed2001

Conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: artificial neural networks improve the prediction of conversion.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now also performed for acute cholecystitis. In the presence of inflammatory conditions, technical difficulties leading to conversion to open cholecystectomy may occur and overshadow the advantages of the laparoscopic approach. Factors associated with these undue events combined with techniques capable of learning from them may help in determining when to completely avoid the laparoscopic procedure. In this study we determined predictors of conversion in acute cholecystitis and tested their predictive ability by means of statistical multivariate analysis and artificial neural networks. Between January 1994 and February 1997, 225 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Preoperative and operative data were prospectively collected on standardized forms. The first 180 laparoscopically approached cases entered the training set, which was learned by both the statistical and the artificial neural networks methods. Conversion was first studied in relation to a set of preoperative data. Prediction models were then fitted by both of these methods. The last 45 operated cases, which remained unknown to the learning systems, served for testing the fitted models. The forward stepwise logistic regression technique, the forward stepwise linear discriminant analysis, and the artificial neural networks method enabled positive prediction of conversion in 0%, 27%, and 100% of the cases, and a negative prediction in 80%, 85.5%, and 97% respectively, in the training set. A positive prediction of conversion in 0%, 25%, and 67% of the cases, and a negative prediction in 82%, 88%, and 94%, respectively, in the untrained, validation set of patients. An artificial neural networks based model provides a practical tool for the prediction of successful laparoscopic cholecystectomies and their conversion. The high degree of certainty of prediction in untrained cases reveals its potential, and justifies, under appropriate conditions, the complete avoidance of laparoscopy and turning directly to open cholecystectomy.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1993

A review of 391 selected open cholecystectomies for comparison with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become a popular operation, not only in the medical literature but also in the lay press. The most recent reports emphasize the advantages of the new method, comparing it with open cholecystectomy, using historical series of unselected patients. A review of 391 selected patients who underwent open cholecystectomy by the author in his private practice shows that open cholecystectomy has no mortality, a 4% incidence of complications, no biliary tract injury, and no need for readmission, reoperation, or blood transfusion. The criteria for selection were more restrictive than the ones used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

[Laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy. Didactic concept for training and introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and preventing complications].

AIM: This study has assessed the suitability of an educational concept for the introduction and training of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a newly established operational procedure, within an university teaching hospital with a large number of surgeons. PATIENTS AND METHODOLOGY: Since introduction of the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy all cholecystectomies were prospectively assessed over a period of two years (from May 1990 till May 1992). The educational concept applied was such that a given surgeon would first receive training from an instructor for 15 procedures and then assume responsibility for instruction of a subsequent trainee. RESULTS: In two years 355 patients underwent cholecystectomy. 60% of the operations were performed laparoscopically and 40% of the operations performed openly. During the two year period 13 surgeons were trained in the new technique, with an average of 16 operations per surgeon. Throughout the introductory phase there were no serious complications, and in particular no damage to the bile duct. DISCUSSION: The advantage of this introductory training phase has repeatedly been subject of discussion in the literature. In the meanwhile guidelines from specialist bodies and national institutions exist for regulating the education of new surgical techniques. In the past few years introduction to new techniques has gradually shifted toward training on the skill-stations and virtual reality trainers. CONCLUSION: The described educational concept for the introduction and training of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been well approved and accepted since the early 90's.

Cholecystectomy↗

PubMed1995

Multivariate comparison of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To answer the question whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) or open cholecystectomy (OC) is safer in terms of complications, the authors evaluated complications relating to 1440 cholecystectomies performed by the same surgeons in a retrospective study. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A definite pronouncement on whether LC truly is superior to OC is not possible because prospective trials are burdened with problems of recruitment. METHODS: After the introduction of LC at the authors' institution in April 1991 and until October 1993, 94.6% (700/740) of all patients admitted for operation because of symptomatic gallstone disease could be treated laparoscopically. The clinical records of the last 700 patients who underwent OC before the introduction of LC were re-evaluated with regard to both overall complications and the grade of complication (severity grade 1-4). A comparison of the incidence of complications relating to the two surgical methods, age, sex, common bile duct stones, acute cholecystitis, concomitant illness, Apache score, and length of operation was calculated by multivariate analysis using the logistic regression model. RESULTS: The total rate of complications in the OC group was 7.7%, with five postoperative deaths, compared with 1.9% and one postoperative death in the LC group. Multivariate analysis for OC revealed that both old age (p = 0.014) and the existence of common bile duct stones (p = 0.02) had independent prognostic influences in increasing the overall complication rate, whereas only old age (p = 0.019) influenced the overall complication rate after LC. Multivariate analysis of all cholecystectomies (n = 1440) showed that the overall complication rate was influenced independently by OC as a detrimental factor. CONCLUSIONS: As this analysis emphasizes, LC can be performed safely with an overall complication rate that is distinctly lower than that of OC. For selective surgery, LC is undoubtedly superior to OC and can probably be seen as a new "gold standard" for cholecystectomies.

Cholecystectomy↗

PubMed2001

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze outcomes after open small-incision surgery (minilaparotomy) and laparoscopic surgery for gallstone disease in general surgical practice. METHODS: This study was a randomized, single-blind, multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC). Both elective and acute patients were eligible for inclusion. All surgeons normally performing cholecystectomy, both trainees under supervision and consultants, operated on randomized patients. LC was a routine procedure at participating hospitals, whereas MC was introduced after a short training period. All nonrandomized cholecystectomies at participating units during the study period were also recorded to analyze the external validity of trial results. The randomization period was from March 1, 1997, to April 30, 1999. RESULTS: Of 1,705 cholecystectomies performed at participating units during the randomization period, 724 entered the trial and 362 patients were randomized to each of the procedures. The groups were well matched for age and sex, but there were fewer acute operations in the LC group than the MC group. In the LC group 264 and in the MC group 150 operations were performed by surgeons who had done more than 25 operations of that type. Median operating times were 100 and 85 minutes for LC and MC, respectively. Median hospital stay was 2 days in each group, but in a nonparametric test it was significantly shorter after LC. Median sick leave and time for return to normal recreational activities were shorter after LC than MC. Intraoperative complications were less frequent in the MC group, but there was no difference in the postoperative complication rate between the groups. There was one serious bile duct injury in each group, but no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Operating time was longer and convalescence was smoother for LC compared with MC. Further analyses of LC versus MC are necessary regarding surgical training, surgical outcome, and health economy.

Bile Ducts↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Bile leak after cholecystectomy significance and treatment: results from the National Norwegian Cholecystectomy Registry.

From April 1993 to July 1995, altogether 3860 procedures were enrolled in the Norwegian National Cholecystectomy Registry (NNCR), 777 (20.2%) being open operations. 3083 (79.8%) were initiated laparoscopically, 313 (10.2%) of these converted to open technique. Mortality within 30 days after open cholecystectomy was 1.9%, after a converted procedure 1.0% and 0.14% after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (p<0.01). According to the intention to treat principle, converted procedures should be included in the laparoscopic group. This gives seven deaths after 3083 procedures, i.e. 0.23%. Postoperative death still occurs approximately 10 times more frequently after open cholecystectomy (p<0.01). However, this is partly due to selection of high risk cases to open technique. Postoperative bile leak was observed in 25 patients (0.9%) in the laparoscopic, 13 (4.2%) in the converted and 19 (2.4%) in the open group. Bile leak contributed significantly to serious complications. 37 major problems were observed in 25 of the patients (44%). Five patients died (8.8%). Among the 57 bile leak patients, common bile duct (CBD) injury was found in 13 (22.8%). Additional 19 CBD injuries occurred, presenting with other symptoms such as icterus, or being recognised during the first operation. The frequency of CBD injury in the laparoscopic group was 14 (0.5%), in the converted group 12 (3.8%) and in the open group 6 (0.8%). None of the patients with CBD injury underwent intraoperative cholangiography. The present results firstly show that open cholecystectomy cannot be considered a safe procedure for high risk patients, secondly, that postoperative bile leak contributes significantly to postoperative mortality and hence is a serious condition generating from CBD injury in about 1/5 of all cases.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Randomized comparison between low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (8 mmHg) minimizes adverse hemodynamic effects, reduces postoperative pain, and accelerates recovery. Similar claims are made for gasless laparoscopy using abdominal wall lifting. The aim of this study was to compare gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy to low-pressure cholecystectomy with respect to postoperative pain and recovery. METHODS: Thirty-six patients were randomized to low-pressure or gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a subcutaneous lifting system (Laparotenser). RESULTS: The characteristics of the patients were similar in the two groups. The procedure was completed in all patients in the low-pressure group, but two patients in the gasless group were converted to pneumoperitoneum. There were no significant differences in postoperative pain and analgesic consumption, but patients in the gasless group developed shoulder pain more frequently (50% vs 11%, p < 0.05). Gasless operation took longer to perform (95 vs 72.5 min, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Gasless and low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy were similar with respect to postoperative pain and recovery. The gasless technique provided inferior exposure and the operation took longer, but the technique may still have value in high-risk patients with cardiorespiratory disease.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Mini-lap cholecystectomy: a viable alternative to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the Third World?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) requires expensive equipment and special training. Mini-lap cholecystectomy (MLC) has no start-up costs but no large series from a single centre has been reported as the procedure is considered hazardous because of inadequate exposure of the surgical field. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 737 cholecystectomies performed through a 3-5-cm transverse subcostal incision and compared the results to published series of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. RESULTS: The operating time (61.6 min; range 35-130), conversion rate (4%), rate of postoperative complications (3.6%), bile duct injuries (0.3%), number of analgesic doses required (3.4; range 3-8), duration of postoperative hospital stay (1.4; range 1-15 days), and the time off work (13.3 days; range 8-61) compare well with the reported results of laparoscopic and MLC. Ninety-three per cent of the patients were followed up for a median period of 28.4 months and none developed biliary stricture. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-lap cholecystectomy is considered a safe, viable alternative to LC in the Third World.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Mini-lap cholecystectomy--an attractive alternative to conventional cholecystectomy.

A prospective study was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of cholecystectomy through a 5 cm transverse abdominal incision. 181 consecutive patients who underwent elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic gall stone disease in a single surgical unit at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi between December 1990 to February 1992, were prospectively randomized into 5 cm transverse and midline incision groups. Operative time, blood loss, post-operative stay and complications were compared in the two groups. Ninety seven patients were included in the transverse incision group and 84 patients in the midline group. Cholecystectomy could be safely performed through a 5 cm transverse incision in 84 patients (86.8%) without increase in operative complications, morbidity or mortality. In another 84 patients cholecystectomy was performed through a midline incision. The average operating time and blood loss were comparable in both groups. The average post-operative stay in 5 cm transverse incision group was 2.6 days (range 1-4 days) and in the midline group was 4.0 days (range 3-5 days). There were 7 post-operative complications (all wound infections) in the 5 cm transverse group and 12 post-operative complications (10 wound infections and 2 pneumonitis) in the midline group. However, the difference in wound infection rate was not statistically significant (p > 0.1). In Conclusion, Cholecystectomy can be safely performed through a 5 cm transverse incision.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy produces less postoperative restriction of pulmonary function than open cholecystectomy.

This study was undertaken to determine whether laparoscopy produces less postoperative decrease in pulmonary function than does open operation. Ten elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients (LC group) were compared to 10 elective open cholecystectomy patients (OC group). Spirometry was performed preoperatively and then postoperatively as soon as each patient was awake and cooperative. The two groups were similar with respect to age, gender, and preexisting medical illness. No patient had underlying cardiopulmonary disease. Postoperatively, forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and maximum forced expiratory flow decreased to 56%, 55%, and 43% of preoperative values in the OC group and to 72%, 76%, and 81% of preoperative values in the LC group. These decreases were significantly greater in the OC group as compared to the LC group, P values < or = 0.05. Cholecystectomy had a significant restrictive effect on immediate postoperative pulmonary function. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy produced significantly less restriction.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy in children: which is better?

Twenty-nine consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) performed between April 1992 and December 1993 were compared with 23 consecutive open cholecystectomies (OC) performed between January 1991 and March 1992 with regard to clinical, surgical, and economic factors. Most patients were Caucasian (> 70%), and symptomatic nonhemolytic cholelithiasis was the most common indication for cholecystectomy. The introduction of LC did not significantly increase the number of cholecystectomies performed per annum. There is a learning curve to LC: the average length of operative time required during the first year was significantly longer than that of OC and the average time for LC during the second year (P < .01). By the second year, the average operative time of LC was not significantly different from OC. There was no conversion from LC to OC, and the complication rate was minor in both groups. The postoperative parenteral analgesic requirement for LC was significantly less than OC (P < .01). The mean length of hospitalization of LC was about three times shorter than that of OC (P < .01). Although the average operating cost per case of LC was significantly more expensive than OC, LC was significantly cheaper because the period of hospitalization was significantly shortened (P < .01). In conclusion, LC is the procedure of choice in the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis in children.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy a safe alternative to open cholecystectomy for pediatric patients with cholelithiasis?

The results with five pediatric patients (6-15 years) who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis are reported here. One patient had associated hematological disease (sickle-cell anemia). All five children were submitted to surgery using the laparoscopic technique. Intraoperative cholangiography was performed in two cases with uncertain ductal and vascular intraoperative anatomy. None of the operations was converted to open cholecystectomy, and there were no operative complications. The mean hospital stay was 2.2 days (range 2-3 days). All five children were able to return to normal activity within a week. No long-term complications were seen in any of the patients during an average follow-up period of 10.6 months (range 8-14). We believe that laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children is safe and effective, and that it is an important alternative to open cholecystectomy. However, prospective comparative studies of the procedure are necessary.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: our experience compared with laparotomic cholecystectomy].

Major bile ducts injuries during cholecystectomy were one of the most common complications, but they were becoming rare. With the introduction and the fast diffusion of laparoscopy their incidence has increased. For this reason we have reviewed our experience about open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We report 18 patients, 8 male and 10 female with age ranged from 27 to 73 years, with common bile duct injuries. Only three patients (20%) underwent surgery in our Department of Surgery of the University of Cagliari. Of these patients, two were operated on open and one laparoscopic cholecystectomy. They represent 0.08% and 0.36% of the respective groups. The most common cause of this complication is peritonitis (94.5%), followed by bleeding and congenital anomalies of the biliary tree, that were present in 5.5% respectively. The conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 3.9% of our patients, while residual choledocholithiasis in one patient was treated by laparotomic reexploration because of the unsuccessful ERCP. In summary in our opinion the prevention of this complication depends on appropriate indication and choice of the patients, as well as an adequate training. The ERCP, if indicated, must be done before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

[Importance of ERCP in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison with classical cholecystectomy].

The authors compare the value of ERCP in laparoscopic and classical cholecystectomy. They analyze groups of 1356 classical and 527 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The number of ERCP indicated before surgery rose in laparoscopic cholecystectomies 17x, as compared with classical surgery. In ERCP indicated after surgery the number increased 2.3x. In choledocholithiasis ERCP proved to be a reliable diagnostic and therapeutic method. The number of laparotomies in residual choledocholithiasis in laparoscopic cholecystectomies should not exceed 10-12%.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗

PubMed2000

Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: We set out to assess the safety and efficacy of mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC) in uncomplicated situations. METHODS: MLC was performed on 30 consecutive selected patients (< 60 years old, ASA I-II, uncomplicated cholecystectomy) with one 12-mm and three 3-mm ports. The total operating time, conversion rate, degree of postoperative pain, duration of postoperative hospital stay, complications, and cosmetic results were all reviewed and compared with 30 cases of consecutive conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). RESULTS: None of the patients in either group required conversion to open cholecystectomy. No complications were observed. The operating time and duration of hospital stay were similar in both groups. The level of postoperative pain was lower in the MLC group (p < 0.001). More patients in the MLC group expressed satisfaction with the cosmetic result (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MLC was shown to be feasible in uncomplicated situations. Furthermore, it was associated with less pain and produced better cosmetic results than conventional LC. Randomized studies are still needed to confirm these findings.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

A new technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy--retrograde laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an analysis of 81 cases.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: A new technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is presented here. This new method, retrograde laparoscopic cholecystectomy (RLC) from fundus to cystic duct downward, may have advantages when exposure of the cystic duct and the common duct are difficult and therefore hazardous. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 173 patients; RLC was performed in 81, The operative procedure is as follows: first, the cystic duct and artery are exposed at the junction of the ampulla. The cystic duct is clipped, and the artery is divided. Removal of the gallbladder is then started from the fundus to cystic duct downward. After the gallbladder has been dissected from the liver bed, the cystic duct is double-clipped and divided. This approach provides better visualization of the gallbladder, cystic duct, and common duct, with less chance of common duct injury, due to clear identification of the ductal system, without the need for intraoperative cholangiography. RESULTS: Eighty-one RLCs were performed without severe complications, either immediate or late. The mean operating time was 23 minutes shorter in RLC than in the usual laparoscopic cholecystectomy, because intraoperative cholangiography was used much less often. CONCLUSION: RLC appears to be a safe procedure, and does not affect the conventional method.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

[Cholecystectomy and colorectal cancer. Does cholecystectomy increase the risk of developing colon cancer?].

PROBLEM: Within the course of the last ten years, a possible association between carcinoma of the colon and prior cholecystectomy has been discussed. METHODOLOGY: In 342 patients with colorectal carcinoma, and in a control group of 182 patients with gastric carcinoma, the rate of prior cholecystectomy was investigated. RESULTS: The cholecystectomy rate in the case of colon carcinoma patients was 7.9, and thus differed non-significantly from that of the control group (5.5%). At least in our case material, no relationship was found between cholecystectomy and carcinoma of the colon. The results reported in other studies are compared and discussed.

Aged↗

PubMed1994

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: 563 cases at a community teaching hospital and a review of 12,201 cases in the literature. Monmouth Medical Center Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Group.

Eleven surgeons attempted laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 563 patients over a 14-month period. Of these 563, 536 (95.3%) were performed successfully; the remaining patients required conversion to laparotomy, but only five because of complications. There were no mortalities associated with the procedure. Thirty-nine patients had complications, 14 surgical and related to the procedure itself. Weight was not considered a contraindication. The preoperative diagnosis in 83.6% patients with chronic cholecystitis, and in the remainder (16.4%) it was acute cholecystitis. Mean operative time was 86.4 min, and mean hospital stay for uncomplicated successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 1.9 days. An extensive review of the literature reveals an additional 9,792 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed at the time of the writing of this paper. Our results compare favorably to these. A discussion of historical aspects of the procedure, contraindications to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and the merits of selective intraoperative cholangiography are also presented.

Acute Disease↗