Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “CHEMOTHERAPY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor is an early response gene to chemotherapy and contributes to chemotherapy resistance.

We have shown that one of the principle mechanisms of chemotherapy resistance involves the activation of nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-kappaB). In an effort to identify NF-kappaB-regulated chemotherapy response genes, we performed a microarray assay and observed that heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) was significantly upregulated by SN38 (a strong inducer of NF-kappaB activity) in colon cancer cells. Further studies revealed that HB-EGF was rapidly induced following a variety of chemotherapy treatments. Using RNA interference, we demonstrated that the chemotherapy-induced HB-EGF was largely dependent on activator protein-1 (AP-1) and NF-kappaB activation. Constitutive HB-EGF expression rescued AP-1/NF-kappaB small interfering RNA (siRNA) cells from chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Meanwhile, we found that the enzymatic shedding of HB-EGF was also regulated by chemotherapy treatment, resulting in the elevated release of soluble HB-EGF from the cellular membrane. Induction of HB-EGF expression and ectodomain shedding synergistically led to robust epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) phosphorylation, whereas inhibition of HB-EGF expression by use of the HB-EGF inhibitor (CRM197) or siRNA resulted in the suppression of chemotherapy-induced EGFR phosphorylation. These results suggest that the chemotherapy-induced EGFR activation is regulated by HB-EGF. Finally, we demonstrated that overexpression of HB-EGF led to apoptotic resistance to chemotherapy, whereas suppression of HB-EGF expression by siRNA resulted in a dramatic increase in cell death. In summary, our study suggests that chemotherapy-induced HB-EGF activation represents a critical mechanism of inducible chemotherapy resistance. Therefore, therapeutic intervention aimed at inhibiting HB-EGF activity may be useful in cancer prevention and treatments.

Apoptosis↗
PubMed2006

[What is the objective of second-line chemotherapy after failure of first-line chemotherapy in hormone-resistant metastatic prostate?].

UNLABELLED: Chemotherapy occupies an increasingly important place in the management of hormone-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. For the first time in this disease, docetaxel increases the survival of patients, with a modest, but definite median gain of about 2 months. In everyday practice, the indication for second-line chemotherapy after immediate or delayed failure of first-line chemotherapy is sometimes considered, although objective data concerning its efficacy are limited. The objective of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate the results obtained with second-line chemotherapy in a patient cohort managed at the Montpellier Regional Cancer Centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical characteristics, treatments delivered and outcome of 43 patients who received two successive lines of chemotherapy were retrospectively collected by means of a standardized questionnaire. Three groups of patients were defined as a function of the chemotherapy protocols delivered: docetaxel alone or in combination, mitoxantrone and other protocols not comprising either docetaxel or mitoxantrone. Responses to chemotherapy were analysed according to three criteria: objective responses, laboratory responses and palliative responses. RESULTS: At the time of second-line chemotherapy, the median age of the patients was 69 years (range: 46 to 83). The median interval between the end of first-line chemotherapy and the start of second-line chemotherapy was 3 months (range: 1 to 15). The protocols administered comprised docetaxel alone (12 patients) or in combination with cisplatin (4 patients), mitoxantrone in 13 patients, or other cytotoxic molecules such as vinblastine, doxorubicin or etoposide in combination with a platinum salt (14 patients). The median number of cycles delivered was 4 (range: 1 to 10). No objective response was observed. Six (14%) patients obtained a laboratory response. A palliative response was observed in 16 (37%) patients, 7 of whom were treated with a docetaxel-based protocol, 6 were treated with mitoxantrone and 3 were treated by other protocols. The median duration of palliative response was 3 months (range: 1 to 6). The median survival was 8 months (range: 1 to 24), with no significant difference between the various protocols. CONCLUSION: In 2006, the objective of second-line chemotherapy in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer appears to be purely palliative. No reference protocol has been defined among currently available cytotoxic molecules. The indication must therefore take into account the benefit/risk balance to avoid compromising the patients quality of life. Therapeutic trials are essential to develop effective new molecules.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Outcomes in patients with splenic marginal zone lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma treated with rituximab with or without chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of patients with splenic marginal zone lymphoma/marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is controversial. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the outcomes of patients with SMZL who received treatment with rituximab, rituximab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy alone. METHODS: The Leukemia Service database was searched for patients with splenic lymphoma who were registered between May 1995 and October 2004. The indications for treatment were the same as those used for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. RESULTS: SMZL was confirmed in 70 patients. The median age was 64 years. The median number of CD20 molecules per cell was 69 x 10(3). Forty-three patients required systemic therapy; rituximab in 26 patients, chemotherapy plus rituximab in 6 patients, and chemotherapy alone in 11 patients. Ten additional patients underwent splenectomy, and 17 patients were in the observation group. The overall response rates were 88% with rituximab, 83% with rituximab plus chemotherapy, and 55% with chemotherapy alone; the 3-year survival rates were 95%, 100%, and 55%, respectively. The 3-year failure-free survival (FFS) rates were 86%, 100%, and 45% in the rituximab, rituximab plus chemotherapy, and chemotherapy alone groups, respectively. Rituximab treatments resulted in longer survival and FFS compared with chemotherapy. Rituximab alone resulted in disappearance of splenomegaly in 92% of patients and normalization of absolute lymphocyte counts. In univariate analysis, younger age and rituximab-based therapy were predictive of longer FFS. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab with or without chemotherapy was found to have major activity in patients with SMZL. These results may be associated with high levels of cellular CD20 antigen sites. Rituximab should be the treatment of choice, at least in older patients with SMZL who have comorbid diseases.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Efficacy and hematologic toxicity of salvage chemotherapy following stem cell-supported high-dose chemotherapy in women with recurrent ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and hematologic toxicity of salvage chemotherapy in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer following high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 19 Massachusetts General Hospital case records of women with relapsed ovarian cancer following PBSCT was conducted. RESULTS: Between February 1996 and September 1998, 24 women with ovarian cancer were treated with PBSCT. Nine patients were treated with an upfront PBSCT regimen to consolidate first-line chemotherapy and 15 patients were treated with PBSCT after a median of two lines (range: 1-3) of prior chemotherapy. Sixteen patients presented with relapsed disease at a median of 230 days post-PBSCT and 3 patients had persistent disease through high-dose chemotherapy. Each of these 19 patients has been treated with salvage chemotherapy following PBSCT. Patients received one of six different first-line salvage chemotherapy regimens. Sixteen of nineteen patients are alive a median of 383 days (range: 156-868) after relapse following PBSCT. Three patients died of progressive disease at a median of 284 days (range: 224-648) after post-PBSCT relapse. Six patients achieved a complete response, four patients had a partial response, three patients had stable disease, and six patients had progressive disease in response to first-line salvage chemotherapy. Seven patients experienced grade III/IV neutropenia, and three patients experienced grade III/IV thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in a patient population selected for chemotherapy sensitive and low-volume disease prior to PBSCT, patients with recurrent tumor appear to respond to salvage chemotherapy, and associated hematologic toxicity is acceptable and manageable.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Chemotherapy versus chemotherapy plus irradiation in limited small cell lung cancer. Results of a controlled trial with 5 years follow-up.

One hundred and forty-five patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer were included in a randomized trial to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy with or without chest irradiation. Seventy-six patients were allotted chemotherapy alone while 69 patients received the same chemotherapy plus radiotherapy, 40 Gy in split-course, administered in weeks 6 and 10 after the initiation of chemotherapy. The chemotherapy consisted of lomustine, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and methotrexate. Patients treated with chemotherapy alone survived for a median of 52 weeks compared to 44 weeks in patients receiving the combined regimen (P = 0.055). After exclusion of five early deaths and one patient refusing the irradiation plus 14 completely resected patients, the remaining 65 patients receiving chemotherapy alone and the 60 patients treated with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy were included in a new analysis. The difference in survival duration which could be ascribed to treatment with or without chest irradiation thereby diminished (P = 0.24). Eighteen months' disease-free survival was obtained in 9.2% of the 65 patients and in 9.8% of the 60 patients. The complete remission rates were 37% and 46%, respectively, (P = 0.33) and the median durations of complete remission were 40 weeks and 52 weeks (P = 0.67). Treatment failure of the primary tumour occurred in 85% of patients treated with chemotherapy alone in contrast to 61% of patients receiving the combined regimen (P = 0.005). Seventy-nine of these patients underwent autopsy at which no residual chest disease was observed in 17% and 37%, respectively (P = 0.045). The combined regimen was more toxic than chemotherapy alone resulting in significantly greater dose reductions and more pronounced thrombocytopenia. Lung and pericardial fibrosis was responsible for four deaths among the complete responders in the radiotherapy group. The combined regimen thus tended to be more efficacious with respect to tumour control at the expense, however, of increased toxicity which per se, eliminated a potential improvement of the overall therapeutical results.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2003

Surgical resection plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone: comparison of two strategies to treat diffuse large B-cell gastric lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of chemotherapy to treat gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) is well known. Whether or not chemotherapy should be performed as the only treatment or after surgical resection is debated. The aim of this study was to compare two strategies: surgical resection plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1988 and December 1996, 58 patients included in the trials promoted by the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA) (LNH-87 and LNH-93) received chemotherapy and 48 included in the protocol of the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Digestifs (GELD) underwent surgical resection followed by chemotherapy. They all presented with localized DLBCL (stage IE and IIE according to the Ann Arbor classification). From the GELA group, seven patients received additional radiotherapy. Gastrectomy was total in 27 of the 48 patients in the GELD group. In both groups chemotherapy included anthracyclin and alkylating agents. Chemotherapy was more intensive in the GELA group than in the GELD group. RESULTS: In the GELA and the GELD groups, distribution according to sex ratio, age (>60 or < or = 60 years), ECOG performance status (> or = 2 or <2) and staging (IE or IIE) was similar. Univariate analysis comparing prognostic factors in both groups showed significant differences: serum lactate dehydrogenase level above normal (28.6% versus 2.4%, P = 0.001), tumor size >10 cm (28.6% versus 12.5%, P = 0.04), patients with International Prognostic Index (IPI) >1 (21.4% versus 11.1%, P = 0.168) and 5-year survival (79% versus 90%, P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors with a Cox model showed that IPI was the only independent prognostic factor (odds ratio 3, P = 0.03). Consequently, patients with IPI 0-1 were selected for comparison between the GELA group (44 patients) and the GELD group (40 patients). There was no significant difference between the two groups. Median follow-up was 59 months (range 3-128). Estimates of 5-year survival rates and event-free survival rates were 90.5% versus 91.1% (P = 0.303) and 85.9% versus 91.6% (P = 0.187), respectively. In the GELA group, seven of 44 patients died: five from a lymphoma-unrelated cause and two from tumor progression. In the GELD group, four of 40 patients died: two of unrelated causes and two from tumor progression. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that in localized gastric DLBCL with IPI 0-1, a similar 5-year survival rate (>90%) is to be expected with either surgery plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Locoregional chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer intra-arterial adjuvant chemotherapy after pancreatectomy with portal vein resection.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The survival of pancreatic cancer patients with portal vein resection is extremely poor due to the high incidence of liver metastasis. The occurrence of liver metastasis is decreased by locoregional arterial infusion after pancreatic surgery. Chemosensitivity tests can provide the basis for individualized chemotherapy in each patient and predict the clinical response. Therefore, the current study was designed to clarify whether locoregional chemotherapy based on the results of chemosensitivity tests has the clinical effects of preventing liver metastasis and improving survival for patients with portal vein resection. METHODOLOGY: The resected specimens from 40 of 47 patients with resection of pancreatic cancer were assessed for chemosensitivity to various anticancer drugs. Fourteen patients underwent portal vein resection due to direct invasion, and nine of these patients received intra-arterial adjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of the results of MTT assay to prevent liver metastasis. The remaining five patients received no chemotherapy. RESULTS: None of the patients who received intra-arterial chemotherapy had liver metastasis, and this group of patients had improved survival. The mean survival of patients with intra-arterial chemotherapy was significantly longer than that of patients without chemotherapy (25.6 months with chemotherapy versus 9.4 months without chemotherapy). CONCLUSION: A pilot study of postoperative intra-arterial chemotherapy showed the reduction of liver metastasis and improvement of survival among pancreatic cancer patients with portal vein resection.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

[Efficacy of concurrent radio-chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect and acute toxicity of concurrent radio-chemotherapy, by NVB and DDP, plus concurrent radiotherapy in comparison with chemotherapy alone in the treatment of inoperable locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LANSCLC). METHODS: Sixty-four patients with inoperable LANSCLC were randomly divided by envelope method into two groups: concurrent radio-chemotherapy group (n = 33) and conventional chemotherapy group (n = 31). The patients in conventional chemotherapy group were treated by NP regimen (NVB + DDP): NVB 25 mg/m(2), d1, 8 and DDP 25-30 mg/m(2) d1-3. In the radio-chemotherapy group by NP regimen plus conventional radiotherapy by (60)Co: 64-68 Gy/2 Gy x 5/w x 6-7w. RESULTS: All patients completed the treatment schedule. The overall response rate (CR + PR) in the radio-chemotherapy group was significantly higher than that in the conventional chemotherapy group: 81.8% vs 45.2%, (P < 0.01) with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 69.7% vs 38.7% (P < 0.05) and 39.4% vs 16.1% (P < 0.05). without any significant difference in the acute toxicity between two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional chemotherapy (NVP and DDP), concurrent radio-chemotherapy (NVP and DDP plus concurrent radiotherapy) is more effective and tolerable for the inoperable locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Randomized trial comparing chemotherapy alone and chemotherapy plus chest irradiation in limited stage small cell lung cancer: a preliminary report.

In order to assess the effectiveness of chest irradiation in addition to intensive chemotherapy in limited stage small cell lung cancer, 50 patients were randomized to receive either chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus chest irradiation, between April 1981 and October 1985. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of a four-drug combination of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, methotrexate, and procarbazine, and a three-drug combination of etoposide, adriamycin, and nimustine, given alternately every 8 weeks. One group of 26 patients received the chemotherapy alone, and another group of 24 patients received chest irradiation with 40 Gy between cycles 1 and 2 of the chemotherapy. Complete response rates were quite similar in the two groups; 50% for those receiving chemotherapy alone, and 59% for those receiving chemotherapy plus chest irradiation. There were no significant differences in median survival (15 months versus 12 months) and in long-term survival rates between the two groups with a median follow-up period of 26 months. The combined modality treatment was more toxic than chemotherapy alone; two patients receiving such treatment died of radiation pneumonitis. It is concluded that chest irradiation combined with chemotherapy does not affect the response rate, survival, or pattern of recurrence in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed2003

International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm trial 1 and Adjuvant ChemoTherapy In Ovarian Neoplasm trial: two parallel randomized phase III trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage ovarian carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy has been suggested as a possible strategy to improve survival in women with early-stage ovarian cancer; however, all randomized studies to date have been too small to answer this question reliably. METHODS: We performed a preplanned combined analysis of two parallel randomized clinical trials (International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm 1 [ICON1] and Adjuvant ChemoTherapy In Ovarian Neoplasm [ACTION]) in early-stage ovarian cancer that compared platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy with observation following surgery. Between November 1990 and January 2000, 925 patients (477 in ICON1 and 448 in ACTION) who had surgery for early-stage ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to receive platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 465) or observation (n = 460) until chemotherapy was indicated. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare overall and recurrence-free survival by treatment allocation. In subgroup analyses of pretreatment age, tumor stage, histologic cell type, and differentiation grade, the differences in relative size of effect were tested using a chi-square test for interaction or a chi-square test for trend. All tests of statistical significance were two-sided. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of over 4 years, 245 patients had died or had a recurrence (ICON1: 133, ACTION: 112). Overall survival at 5 years was 82% in the chemotherapy arm and 74% in the observation arm (difference = 8% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 2% to 12%]; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.50 to 0.90; P =.008). Recurrence-free survival at 5 years was also better in the adjuvant chemotherapy arm than it was in the observation arm (76% versus 65%, difference = 11% [95% CI = 5% to 16%]; HR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.50 to 0.82; P =.001). Subgroup analyses provided no evidence of a difference in the size of effect of chemotherapy on survival in any pretreatment subcategory. CONCLUSIONS: Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy improved overall survival and recurrence-free survival at 5 years in this combined group of patients with early-stage ovarian cancer defined by the inclusion criteria of the ICON1 and ACTION trials.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The role of second-line chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have relapsed or failed to respond to first-line treatment was unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of any second-line chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC. SEARCH STRATEGY: Bibliographic databases were searched. Handsearching and contact with experts was also performed. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled clinical trials in which any second-line chemotherapy was compared with BSC in patients with NSCLC who had previously failed to any previous chemotherapy regimen. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data was extracted by 2 independent reviewers and revised by all authors. MAIN RESULTS: Only one study was included. It randomised 204 patients to receive either doxetaxel or BSC. Following an unacceptably high toxic death rate the dose of doxetaxel was reduced from 100 mg/m(2) to 75 mg/m(2). Doxetaxel gave an extra 2.4 months of survival - an average of 7.0 months vs 4.6 months on BSC. At 1 year after diagnosis 29% of doxetaxel treated patients were alive compared with 19% of the BSC group. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Definitive recommendations cannot be made since evidence is only available from one randomised controlled trial which, though of reasonable quality, had a number of limitations. There is currently no evidence to support second-line treatment of patients with poor performance status. Larger, well-designed controlled trials are needed to further evaluate whether the benefits of second-line chemotherapy to patients with NSCLC outweigh its risks and costs.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed2003

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primarily unresectable, advanced-stage ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to report our experience and the feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. METHODS: Forty-five patients with primarily unresectable advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer were treated in our center between 1995 and 2002 by platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Their files were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: At the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, according to RECIST criteria, 1 patient (2.2%) had achieved a clinical complete response (CR), 33 (73.4%) a partial response (PR), and 8 (17.8%) had stable disease (SD). Only 3 (6.6%) patients showed disease progression (PD). Surgery was performed in patients with objective response or SD after a median number of 4 courses (range: 2-6) of induction chemotherapy. A complete macroscopic debulking was achieved in 24 (53.3%) out of 39 patients in whom cytoreductive surgery was performed. For the entire group, median overall survival was 29 months. Survival was significantly improved in patients with optimal debulking compared to patients with persistent tumor after surgery: 41 months versus 23 months (P = 0.0062). Median survival for patients responding to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CR and PR) was 44 months compared to 27 months for patients with SD or PD after initial chemotherapy (P = 0.01). Neither treatment-related deaths nor significant toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by optimal debulking may be a safe and valuable treatment alternative in patients with primarily unresectable advanced-stage bulky ovarian cancer. Patients with an objective response to chemotherapy or absence of macroscopic residual tumor after surgery have a better outcome. This approach is currently being tested in large, prospective randomized clinical trials.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Clinical outcome of primary gastric lymphoma treated with chemotherapy alone or surgery followed by chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The role of surgical resection in the treatment of primary gastric lymphoma (PGL) remains unclear. This retrospective study evaluated the clinical outcome of PGL treated with chemotherapy alone or surgery followed by chemotherapy. METHODS: During 1986-2003, 59 patients with PGL (other than mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue type lymphoma) were identified from hospital files. The medical records, pathologic sections, radiographic images and treatment modalities of these patients were reviewed. Patients were categorized into localized (stage IE and IIE-1) and advanced (stage IIE-2 or beyond) stage groups. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The study included 55 patients who received treatment at the same institute. Among them, 32 had localized PGL (15 stage IE, 17 stage IIE-1) and 23 had advanced disease. The median survival of the localized stage group was not reached during a mean follow-up of 168.1 +/- 16.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 135.4-200.8 months), while that of the advanced stage group was 33.0 +/- 6.8 months (95% CI, 19.7-46.5; p < 0.001, log-rank test). Among patients with localized PGL, the 5-year overall survival rate of those receiving chemotherapy alone (n = 19) or combination therapy (surgery followed by chemotherapy, n = 13) was 73.4% and 87.5%, respectively (p = 0.229). The 5-year disease-free survival was 68.4% and 84.6%, respectively (p = 0.540). However, post-chemotherapy life-threatening hemorrhage occurred in five of the 32 patients (15.6%) in the localized stage group: four in the chemotherapy-alone group, and one in the combination therapy group, all of whom had failed to achieve complete response. CONCLUSION: The clinical outcome of localized PGL treated by chemotherapy alone is similar to that treated by surgery followed by chemotherapy in terms of tumor response, disease-free survival and overall survival, suggesting that surgery be reserved for those with residual tumors after chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

High dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is a hypothesis that high dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation (autograft) may improve survival for women with metastatic breast cancer. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of high dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation with conventional chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: We used the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group search strategy, adding these terms: bone marrow transplantation, stem cell transplantation, autologous stem cell support. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE (until November 2004), EMBASE (until November 2004), ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology) (1995-2004) and the COCHRANE LIBRARY (Issue 4 2004). We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group database and cooperative research groups' websites for unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of high dose chemotherapy and autograft with conventional chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. Studies included one or more of the following outcomes: treatment related mortality, overall or progression-free survival at 1, 2, 3, 5 or 7 years, morbidity, quality of life measures, time to tumour progression, overall survival time. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Six randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: In total 438 eligible women were randomised to receive high dose chemotherapy with autograft and 412 were randomised to receive conventional treatment. There were fifteen treatment-related deaths among the high dose group and two in the control (conventional dose) group (RR 4.07 (95% CI 1.39, 11.88)). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between the high dose and control groups at one year, three years or five years. At one and five years of follow up, there was a statistically significant difference in event-free survival, favouring the high dose group (one year: RR 1.76 (95% CI 1.40, 2.21); five years: RR 2.84 (95% CI 1.07, 7.50). Toxicity was more severe in the high dose group. Only one of the trials has followed up all women for five years and further data are awaited. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although there is statistically significant evidence that high dose chemotherapy and autograft improves event free survival compared to conventional chemotherapy, there is no statistically significant evidence of benefit in overall survival for women with metastatic breast cancer. High dose chemotherapy with bone marrow or stem cell transplantation should not be given to women with metastatic breast cancer outside of clinical trials.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2006

Primary chemotherapy-associated effect of second-line chemotherapy on survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: The current treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who have received initial platinum- or taxane-based chemotherapy depends on the results of the initial chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how to make the selection of second-line agents for patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma initially diagnosed as stage II to IV. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective crossover study in patients who received second-line chemotherapy at Jikei University School of Medicine. We evaluated the responses, progression-free survivals, survivals of second-line chemotherapy, and overall survivals after primary surgery for 51 patients. The treatment cohorts were defined as follows: TC1, patients who were given paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy and who, upon recurrence, were treated with a platinum-based combination as second-line; and TC2, patients who were given a non-taxane-based platinum combination as first-line chemotherapy, followed, at the time of recurrence, with paclitaxel and carboplatin. RESULTS: The response rates of the second-line chemotherapy for the TC1 and TC2 groups were 44% and 25% (P=0.09). The median progression-free survivals of TC1 and TC2 were 12.9 and 6.4 months (P=0.018; hazard ratio [HR], 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-5.04). The median survivals after second-line chemotherapy for the two groups were 16.8 and 10.4 months (P=0.007; HR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.33-5.84) and overall survivals after primary surgery were 36.6 and 27.9 months (P=0.007; HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.07-5.21). CONCLUSION: The TC1 group demonstrated a significantly better response and extension of progression-free survival, as well as significantly better survival after crossover and overall survival after primary surgery. As this was a retrospective analysis, this effect should be considered as hypothesis-generating and assessed prospectively in other trials comparing these two chemotherapy schedules.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1997

High-dose chemotherapy, autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation and post-transplant consolidation chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer.

This study was designed to determine the complete response (CR) rate, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with an adriamycin-based induction regimen, high-dose chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa with autologous bone marrow or stem cell reinfusion, followed by post-transplant 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. Forty-eight consecutive patients were enrolled and 35 received two to four cycles of a cytoreductive chemotherapy regimen followed by high-dose chemotherapy which included cyclophosphamide and thiotepa. Thirty-three patients with non-progressive disease received at least one cycle of post-transplant 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. Fifty percent of patients with evaluable disease responded to induction chemotherapy. Three of the 34 patients (9%) evaluable for response to high-dose chemotherapy achieved CR, eight (24%) achieved partial response (PR), 12 (35%) had stable disease (SD) and 11 (32%) had progressive disease (PD). The median time to neutrophil recovery was 11.5 days (range, 8 to 40 days) post- reinfusion. The median time to platelet independence was 14.5 days (range, 8 to 44 days). The median follow-up is 24.5 months (range, 1 to 96 months). The actuarial probability of EFS for all patients is 17% at 4 years. The EFS for patients receiving all four cycles of post-transplant chemotherapy is 27% at 4 years, compared to 36% at 1 year for patients not receiving any post-transplant chemotherapy. Ten of the 48 patients (21%) are alive, and seven of these (15%) have no evidence of disease. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood-derived stem cell transplantation followed by post-transplant consolidation chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer results in a proportion of patients without evidence of disease at 4 years.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Chemotherapy alone vs. chemotherapy plus high dose multiple antioxidants in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: In vitro and animal studies suggest that antitumor effect of chemotherapeutic agents may be enhanced by antioxidants. Therefore, we initiated a clinical study to test the efficacy of high-dose multiple antioxidants (vitamins C, E and beta carotene) as an adjunct to chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) in non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: 136 patients of stage IIIb and stage IV NSCLC were randomized to receive chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) alone (chemotherapy arm, n = 72) or chemotherapy in combination with ascorbic acid 6100 mg/day, dl-alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E) 1050 mg/day and beta-carotene 60 mg/day (combination arm, n = 64). Survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: An overall response rate (RR) of 33% was observed in chemotherapy arm with 24 patients showing a partial response (PR) and none showing a complete response (CR). In combination arm the overall RR was 37% with 24 patients showing PR and two showing CR. The median survival times in chemotherapy arm and combination arm were nine and 11 months respectively. The overall survival (OS) rates in chemotherapy arm and combination arm at one year were 32.9% and 39.1%, and at two years, 11.1% and 15.6% respectively. None of these differences were statistically significant (p = 0.20). Toxicity profiles were similar in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support the concern that antioxidants might protect cancer cells from the free radical damage induced by chemotherapy. Larger trials are needed to demonstrate whether high-dose multiple antioxidants in conjunction with chemotherapy increase the response rates and/or survival time in advanced lung cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Characteristics associated with long-term progression-free survival following high-dose chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer and influence of chemotherapy dose.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to characterize long-term progression-free survivors (LTPFS) of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) following high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and to assess the influence of chemotherapy dose in order to identify patients who derive major benefit from this approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared patient and tumor characteristics of 16 LTPFS with the characteristics of 118 MBC patients who received HDCT with ASCT at our institution between 1992 and 2000. To estimate the cumulative dose of chemotherapy received, the summation dose intensity product (SDIP) of the different chemotherapy regimens was calculated as recently described by Hryniuk et al. The SDIP of the induction regimens was added to that of the HDCT regimens to yield the total SDIP of the chemotherapy received. Multivariate analysis was performed to describe the influence of the total SDIP and other prognostic factors on progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: LTPFS were mostly < or = 50 years of age and had limited, chemotherapy-sensitive, hormone-responsive MBC. Due to an apparent dose-survival relationship, an increase by 10 units (U) in the SDIP increased the PFS time by 3 months. Independent predictors of an improved PFS were positive estrogen receptors (P = 0.001), positive combined hormone receptors (P = 0.020), and a complete remission/no evidence of disease status after HDCT (P < 0.001). In patients who had a disease-free interval (DFI) >24 months after primary surgery, an SDIP of >55 U was independently associated with a longer PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.73; 95% confidence interval 1.29-5.81; P = 0.009]. CONCLUSION: HDCT can achieve long-term PFS in young MBC patients with limited, hormone-responsive and chemotherapy-sensitive disease. After a DFI >24 months, a longer PFS is associated with a higher chemotherapy dose as measured by SDIP. These retrospective analyses suggest SDIP might be a tool for studying cumulative dose as a determinant of outcome of MBC chemotherapy. Thus far, however, we cannot clearly identify any subgroup of MBC patients in whom HDCT with ASCT is of particular benefit.

Adult↗