Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Basiliximab”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Removal of basiliximab by plasmapheresis.

Basiliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha chain of interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptors. Given its expected volume of distribution (plasma volume), therapeutic plasmapheresis may be expected to lower serum Basiliximab levels. A 20-mg dose of Basiliximab was given before plasmapheresis. Blood and pheresis fluid samples were obtained to monitor Basiliximab levels. A total of three blood samples were drawn: the first was obtained 4 hours before, the second sample immediately before commencement, and the third 2 hours after cessation of plasmapheresis. A fourth sample was obtained from the removed plasma. There was an appreciable reduction in Basiliximab concentration levels after plasmapheresis. From the change in serum concentration after plasmapheresis, approximately 64.6% of circulating Basiliximab was removed. Plasmapheresis removes substantial amounts of Basiliximab. Therefore, supplemental Basiliximab should be given after plasmapheresis to maintain the desired duration of IL-2R saturation.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

A comparison of basiliximab and anti-thymocyte globulin as induction agents after lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-2 receptor antagonists have supplanted polyclonal antibody preparations as the most frequently used induction agents after lung transplantation, but the relative efficacy of these agents has not been firmly established. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of basiliximab compared with antithymocyte globulin among 157 adult lung transplant recipients at our center. RESULTS: At 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation, the median cumulative acute rejection A scores for the basiliximab group (2, 2, and 3, respectively) were significantly higher than those for the anti-thymocyte globulin group (1, 1, and 2, respectively; p = 0.003, 0.004, and 0.033, respectively). In addition, basiliximab recipients were more likely to develop acute rejection grade > or = A2 than anti-thymocyte globulin recipients; in fact, 60% of basiliximab recipients compared with 38% of anti-thymocyte globulin recipients developed their first episode of acute rejection grade > or = A2 in the first 100 days after transplantation (log-rank p = 0.04). Furthermore, basiliximab recipients were more likely to develop bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome than anti-thymocyte globulin recipients (log-rank p = 0.036). Two years after transplantation, 36% of basiliximab recipients and 26% of anti-thymocyte globulin recipients developed bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. However, there were no significant differences in the incidences of cytomegalovirus viremia and pneumonitis between the 2 groups (p = 0.86 and 0.89, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Induction with anti-thymocyte globulin is associated with a lower burden of acute rejection and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome compared with basiliximab, without a significant difference in the incidence of cytomegalovirus infections.

Adult↗

Third dose of basiliximab in pediatric renal transplantation.

Antibody induction therapy is frequently used in pediatric renal transplantation to reduce risk of early rejection. We previously reported lower rates of human herpes virus type 6 (HHV-6) reactivation in patients receiving monoclonal antibody induction with basiliximab, compared to patients receiving antithymocyte globulin/antilymphocyte globulin treatment. Subclinical rejection events were still present in many patients in the first 6 months after transplantation. This prompted a third dose of basiliximab to be administered at day 21 in addition to the standard two doses given immediately prior to transplantation and on day 4. No significant reduction of subclinical rejections was noted in the 11 patients receiving triple dosing of basiliximab. Two patients developed an allergic reaction responsive to intravenous fluids, steroids, and antihistamines with full resolution within 30 minutes of administration. There was no increase in de novo infection or reactivation of HHV-6 or Epstein-Barr virus in this group compared to patients receiving two doses of basiliximab. The goal of reduction of early subclinical rejection events was not achieved with the third dosing of basiliximab in this initial group of pediatric renal transplant patients. However, 63.6% of patients receiving triple basiliximab remained free of clinical and/or subclinical rejection for the first 6 months posttransplant compared to only 36.4% remaining rejection-free for the same interval in the group who received the conventional two doses of basiliximab.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Effect of basiliximab on renal allograft rejection within 1 year after transplantation.

Basiliximab is widely used in clinical practice for initial immunosuppressive treatment of renal transplant recipients, seeking to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes without adverse events. This retrospective study included 123 renal allograft recipients transplanted at a single center. All were followed for longer than 1 year after transplantation and treated with calcineurin inhibitor and steroid (methylprednisolone) for prophylactic immunosuppression, but basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil were optional. We compared the outcomes of renal transplant recipients who were versus treated were not with basiliximab as initial immunosuppressive therapy. Basiliximab was used for initial immunosuppression in 42 patients. Their maintenance immunosuppressive treatment included triple (n = 44) or double (n = 79) regimens, including a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine [n = 87] or tacrolimus [n = 36]), methylprednisolone with or without mycophenolate mofetil. Twenty-six (21.1%) patients had a rejection episode within 1 year after transplantation and 22 (17.9%) had infections. Within the first year after transplantation the patients who were treated with basiliximab showed fewer rejection episodes (n = 6, 14.3%) than the patients without this therapy (n = 20, 24.7%), which was not statistically significant (P = .245). However, basiliximab significantly affected the occurrence of rejection episodes among the double immunosuppressive regimen group (P = .006), but not the triple regimen group (P = .098) without an impact on infection episodes (P value of double, triple = .291, .414) within 1 year after transplantation. We concluded that basiliximab was more useful for the recipients treated with double immunosuppression with a calcineurin inhibitor and steroid than for those on a triple regimen including mycophenolate mofetil.

Adult↗

Improved treatment response with basiliximab immunoprophylaxis after liver transplantation: results from a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Basiliximab, a high-affinity chimeric monoclonal antibody, is effective in reducing acute rejection episodes in renal allograft recipients. We assessed the ability of this antibody to similarly improve the outcome in liver transplant recipients. Adult recipients of a primary cadaveric liver transplant were randomized to treatment, stratified by hepatitis C virus (HCV) seropositivity. Patients were administered 40 mg of basiliximab (n = 188) or placebo (n = 193) as two 20-mg bolus injections days 0 and 4, plus cyclosporine and steroids. Primary efficacy variables were biopsy-confirmed acute rejection and its composite end point, including death or graft loss, and were assessed at 6 and 12 months and by HCV cohort. Because of differential efficacy responses between HCV-positive and HCV-negative cohorts, an additional analysis incorporating HCV recurrence as a component of treatment failure, termed problem-free transplant, was introduced. Safety and tolerability were monitored over the 12 months of the study. All 381 patients were assessable, and no meaningful differences in background characteristics were apparent between treatment groups. Biopsy-confirmed acute rejection rates 6 months after transplantation were 35.1% in the basiliximab group versus 43.5% in the placebo group. For death, graft loss, or first biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, rates were 44.1% versus 52.8%, respectively. The reduction in rejection episodes was concentrated in the HCV-negative cohort (14.5% relative to placebo; P =.034), with a much smaller difference (2.9%) in the HCV-positive cohort. For HCV-positive patients, problem-free transplant was shown at 12 months in 26.6% of the basiliximab group versus 11.6% in the placebo group (P =.020) and for all patients at 12 months in 39.7% of the basiliximab group versus 30.1% in the placebo group (P =.035). The incidence of infection and other adverse events was similar across the two treatment groups. There were 56 deaths (25 deaths, basiliximab group; 31 deaths, placebo group) over the 12-month study. The intravenous bolus injection was well tolerated. Immunoprophylaxis with 40 mg of basiliximab, in combination with cyclosporine and steroids, reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes with no clinically relevant safety or tolerability concerns. The influence of HCV recurrence on efficacy results can be accounted for in future trials by using the concept of problem-free transplant, incorporating recurrence as a component of treatment failure.

Adult↗

An economic and quality-of-life assessment of basiliximab vs antithymocyte globulin immunoprophylaxis in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporin A has substantially improved clinical outcomes for renal transplantation. Whether basiliximab (a chimeric monoclonal antibody) demonstrates economic and quality-of-life advantages over other induction therapies has not yet been shown. METHODS: A multi-centre open-label clinical trial was conducted among renal transplant recipients in the US, in which patients were randomized into two induction therapy regimens: basiliximab and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as part of a quadruple immunosuppressive regimen. Medical resources used and a EuroQol visual analogue scale (VAS) rating of quality of life were collected prospectively for the 135 dosed subjects for a period of 1 year post-treatment. We analysed the differences between treatment groups in 1-year costs and 1-year quality-adjusted survival. We also conducted a post hoc analysis of outcomes among the subgroup of patients identified as high risk. RESULTS: A significant difference was observed in first-year post-treatment costs (basiliximab, $45857; ATG, $54729; difference, $8872 (95% CI, $1169 to $16573). The savings from basiliximab can be attributed to the less expensive induction therapy (basiliximab, $2378; ATG, $8670; difference, $6292 (95% CI, $5165 to $7419)) and other savings during the initial hospitalization totalling $2609. One-year quality-adjusted survival was the same in both groups (basiliximab, 81.5; ATG, 81.1; difference, 0.45 (95% CI, -5.9 to 6.8)). The results of the post hoc analysis of the 48 high-risk patients were comparable to the analysis of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate lower first-year post-treatment costs in renal-transplant recipients receiving basiliximab compared to ATG with no differences in quality-adjusted survival. The results also suggest similar differences among high-risk subjects.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Single centre experience with basiliximab in paediatric renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Introduction of IL-2-receptor antagonists has led to significantly decreasing numbers of acute rejection episodes in renal transplantation in adults. No data are available in paediatric recipients. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2000, 78 renal transplantations were performed in 77 children aged 0.5-16 years. Basiliximab, cyclosporin A (CsA) and prednisolone were administered in 48 children (age 7.8 +/- 5.3 years) and compared with 29 children (age 7.3 +/- 5.2 years) receiving CsA and prednisolone only. The number of acute rejections, survival, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and side effects were determined for 3 years after transplantation. RESULTS: All 77 patients survived the observation period. One year graft survival in the basiliximab group was 95%, which is similar to the comparison group (93%). Children receiving basiliximab showed a lower incidence of acute rejection than the comparison group (14% vs 34%). The calculated GFR was lower in the basiliximab group when discharging from hospital, with 51 compared with 66 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in the non-basiliximab group. This was associated with higher CsA trough levels (214 vs 174 ng/ml) in the basiliximab patients. After 1 year the GFR was comparable in both groups (58 vs 52 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab offers excellent allograft survival, a lower incidence of acute rejections and almost no side effects. Therefore it can be recommended for routine immunosuppressive therapy in paediatric renal transplantation.

Adolescent↗

Reduced acute rejection and superior 1-year renal allograft survival with basiliximab in patients with diabetes mellitus. The Global Simulect Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Renal allograft recipients with diabetes mellitus often demonstrate poorer clinical outcomes than nondiabetic patients. Basiliximab (Simulect), a chimeric anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, reduced the incidence of acute rejection in renal allograft recipients in 2 multicenter, placebo-controlled, phase III trials. METHODS: An analysis of pooled results from the 2 trials was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of basiliximab with placebo in renal transplant recipients with and without prior diabetes. Patients received either basiliximab (20 mg on day 0 and day 4 posttransplantation) or placebo in combination with cyclosporine for microemulsion (Neoral) and steroids. RESULTS: A total of 722 patients (150 diabetic, 572 nondiabetic) were eligible for intent-to-treat analysis. At 12 months, basiliximab as compared with placebo reduced the proportion of patients experiencing first acute rejection by 41% in diabetics (P<0.01) and by 29% in nondiabetics (P<0.001). Biopsy-confirmed rejection was reduced by 44% in diabetics (P<0.01) and by 26% in nondiabetics (P<0.01). The first acute rejection episode requiring augmented immunosuppression other than steroids was reduced by 49% in diabetics (P<0.01) and by 41% in nondiabetics (P<0.001); death, graft loss, or first rejection episode was reduced by 43% in diabetics (P=0.001) and by 22% in nondiabetics (P<0.01). Superior graft survival was maintained in diabetic recipients treated with basiliximab versus placebo (96% vs. 86%; P=0.022). There were no significant differences in safety between basiliximab and placebo in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab is associated with a significant reduction in acute rejection and an excellent safety profile in renal transplant recipients with and without diabetes mellitus. Superior graft survival was evident in diabetic patients.

Acute Disease↗

A multicenter, open-label, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic safety, and tolerability study of basiliximab (Simulect) in pediatric de novo renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Basiliximab (Simulect) has been shown to be safe and effective in adult renal transplant recipients, when used in combination with cyclosporine (Neoral) and corticosteroids. We report on the safety and preliminary efficacy of basiliximab in pediatric de novo renal transplant recipients. METHODS: This was an open-label, 12-month study of basiliximab in 41 patients (2 cohorts: <9 and 9 to <16 years). In phase 1, two intravenous (IV) bolus injections of basiliximab (12 mg/m ) were administered (before and 4 days postsurgery). In phase 2, two injections (<40 kg, 10 mg and > or =40 kg, 20 mg) were administered at the same time points. Most patients (26/41 [63%]) received cadaveric kidneys. Almost half of the patients had three human leukocyte antigen mismatches with the organ donors. Concurrent immunosuppression included Neoral and corticosteroids. Azathioprine was allowed after 28 days. RESULTS: All patients completed the 1-year study. The acute tolerability of basiliximab via IV bolus injection was good, without evidence of cytokine-release syndrome or acute local reactions. All patients experienced adverse events, but most (71%) were mild or asymptomatic. No deaths or malignancies occurred. The incidence and types of serious adverse events (59%) and serious infections (44%) were as expected in this patient population, and few were drug-related (7% and 5%, respectively). Thirty-eight patients (93%) had infections, mostly urinary tract infections, as expected for renal transplant patients. Six patients (15%) had drug-related adverse events. Biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes occurred in 6/41 (15%) of patients during the first 6 months posttransplantation and in 9/41 (22%) patients during the first 12 months. Five patients (12%) experienced graft loss, none of which were preceded by acute rejection episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab is safe and well tolerated when administered by IV bolus injection in de novo pediatric renal transplant recipients. These preliminary data suggest that basiliximab, given in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids, is an effective immunosuppressive regimen for the prevention of acute rejection in pediatric renal transplantation.

Adolescent↗

Mycophenolate mofetil in pediatric renal transplantation: non-induction vs. induction with basiliximab.

North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS) reports have shown anti-T cell antibody, OKT3, to be deleterious in pediatric renal transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Unlike OKT3, basiliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody to the alpha subunit of the interleukin-2 receptor on activated T-lymphocytes. We sought to examine the outcome of MMF with or without basiliximab induction therapy in pediatric renal transplantation. Between January 1998, and June 2001, 49 pediatric renal transplants were performed at our center and 41 met the criteria for this study. We retrospectively analyzed the records of 25 patients who received MMF, Prednisone, CSA or TAC, alone (group I) and 16 patients who received MMF, CSA or TAC, and Prednisone in combination with basiliximab (group II). The two groups were similar with respect to recipient or donor age, gender, ethnicity, donor source (LD vs. CAD), cold ischemia time, and primary diagnosis. The basiliximab group had a shorter follow up period because of its more recent addition to our pediatric immunosuppression protocol, 12.9 +/- 5.9 months vs. 35.5 +/- 7.2 months for group I (p < 0.0001). At 6 months, the acute rejection rate was 16% (group I) compared with 25% (group II) (p = 0.689). The patient and graft survival at 6 and 12 months were 100% respectively for both groups. Basiliximab was well tolerated without significant adverse events. At 6 months, there was no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of urinary tract infection or cytomegalovirus infection. These data suggest that in the short-term, MMF with or without basiliximab induction therapy appears to yield excellent and statistically similar outcomes. However, further controlled studies are necessary to verify these findings as well as to define the role of basiliximab in MMF-treated pediatric renal transplant recipients.

Adolescent↗

Induction therapy with basiliximab allows delayed initiation of cyclosporine and preserves renal function after cardiac transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine (CsA) is frequently initiated as induction therapy in patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation, but our experience has identified a significant rate of post-operative renal dysfunction. We therefore devised a renal-sparing cyclosporine-free induction regimen consisting of the early administration basiliximab, an interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, followed by the late initiation of cyclosporine on post-operative Day 4. METHODS: Between September 1998 and December 1999, we treated 25 patients at risk for post-operative renal dysfunction (high-risk basiliximab group) with the new induction regimen and another 33 patients not at risk (low-risk CsA group) for renal dysfunction with our standard cyclosporine protocol. We identified a historical control group (1996 through 1998) of 32 patients at risk for renal dysfunction (high-risk CsA group) who had received our standard cyclosporine protocol. RESULTS: The increase in serum creatinine levels after transplantation was less in the high-risk basiliximab group (-0.1 +/- 0.7) than in the high-risk CsA group (0.5 +/- 1.0, p < 0.02) and comparable to the low-risk CsA group (0.03 +/- 0.6). The basiliximab protocol did not increase rejection; the percentage of rejection episodes was high-risk basiliximab, 0; high-risk CsA, 13; and low-risk CsA, 3 (p = .13). CONCLUSION: Basiliximab induction therapy allows delayed initiation of cyclosporine after cardiac transplantation without an increase in rejection and reduces the risk of post-operative renal dysfunction.

Adult↗

Initial data on basiliximab in critically ill children undergoing heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: More children are coming to heart transplantation on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or inotropic support and/or with renal impairment. The use of basiliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD25 (interleukin 2 receptor alfa) has not been previously reported in critically ill pediatric heart transplant recipients. Basiliximab has potential advantages in the treatment of patients with renal impairment. METHODS: Basiliximab was provided to 29 patients (median age 7.8 years; range 0.4-16 years) on ECMO, with renal impairment or receiving intravenous inotropes at transplantation. Children normally received 2 doses on Day 0 and Day 4 after transplantation. Calcineurin inhibitor was provided in low dose or withheld altogether in patients with renal impairment. Flow cytometry was used to monitor CD25. RESULTS: At transplantation, 11 patients were prescribed cyclosporine; the remaining 18 received tacrolimus. All but 4 patients had subtherapeutic levels of calcineurin inhibitor in the first postoperative week. Excluding these 4, there were 19 patients who had more than 4 consecutive doses of calcineurin inhibitor canceled in the first week (median 8 doses; range 3-40 doses). A total of 71 surveillance biopsies were performed, and 4 episodes of severe acute rejection occurred in the first 6 months. In all but one child, the glomerular filtration rate had returned to, or improved on baseline measurement by 1 month after transplantation. Infections rates were low and acceptable. CD25 was undetectable at first assessment, and in all but 1 patient (on ECMO) for at least 2 to 3 weeks thereafter. There were no adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab was well tolerated in this group of very ill children. In children with pre- or postoperative renal dysfunction, where doses of calcineurin inhibitor were low or canceled, basiliximab was associated with a low incidence of rejection. Posttransplant ECMO may reduce the efficacy of basiliximab. These preliminary results are encouraging and now need confirmation in a large, randomized trial.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Triple immunosuppression with or without basiliximab in pediatric renal transplantation: acute rejection rates at one year.

Acute rejection (AR) is a major determinant of chronic allograft dysfunction and graft survival. This study evaluated the effect of basiliximab on AR in pediatric renal transplantation on triple immunosuppression. Forty-three transplantations (25 males and 18 females; mean age 14.9 +/- 3.6 years) were performed between 1996 and 2002. Thirteen of the grafts came from cadaveric donors and 30 from living-related donors. All patients were placed on immunosuppression with prednisolone + (azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil) + (cyclosporine [CYA] or tacrolimus). Basiliximab was also administered in 20 cases. The respective rates of biopsy-proven AR in the basiliximab group (BG) and the standard-regimen group (N-BG) were 0% vs 17.4% (P >.05) at 1 month posttransplantation; 0% vs 26.1% (P <.05) at 3 months; 0% vs 26.1% (P <.05) at 6 months, and 7.1% vs 26.1% (P >.05) at 12 months. In the N-BG group the 1- and 3-year graft survival rates were 91.3% (21/23) and 83.3% (15/18), respectively. The mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the first year after the transplantation was 75 +/- 33 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the N-BG and 98 +/- 21 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the BG patients (P <.05). Basiliximab significantly reduced the rates of acute rejection at 3 and 6 months after pediatric renal transplantation. The GFR in the first year was significantly higher among the patients treated with basiliximab, which was well tolerated by all patients and caused no significant adverse effects. The effect of basiliximab on long-term graft survival and chronic allograft dysfunction deserves further investigation.

Adolescent↗

Basiliximab-chimeric anti-IL2-R monoclonal antibody in pediatric liver transplantation: comparative study.

Basiliximab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the alpha subunit (CD(25)) of the interleukin-2 receptor of activated T lymphocytes. The advantage of basiliximab in organ transplantation is the reduce possibility to calcineurin inhibitor dosages to avoid nephrotoxicity. Basiliximab has significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection (AR) in renal transplant recipients; however, the results are uncertain in liver transplantation (LT). The objective of this investigation was to assess the effect of basiliximab to prevent AR in the first 6 months after pediatric LT. From March 2000 to October 2001, 32 recipients of a primary orthotopic cadaveric or living donor LT were given basiliximab by intravenous bolus injection on the day of transplantation (day 0) and on day 4. Four children who received one dose were excluded from the study. The rate and the intensity of AR episodes, the incidence of chronic rejection, serum creatinine level, incidence of infections, adverse side effects, and daily oral dosage of cyclosporine (Neoral) to maintain the target blood level of 850 to 1000 mg/dL at C2, 2 hours after the administration, were analyzed in the remaining 28 recipients. Results were compared to those obtained from a matched historical group (n = 28) of similar age, weight, and hepatic diseases distribution. None of the analyzed parameters was statistically significant (P >.05) except for the daily oral dose of cyclosporine (7 to 13 mg/kg/dose, P <.05). In our series, the addition of basiliximab to the immunosuppressive therapy did not reduce the incidence of AR in pediatric LT.

Adolescent↗

Efficacy of basiliximab induction therapy in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation: a rapid steroid withdrawal protocol.

INTRODUCTION: We have performed ABO-incompatible (ABO-i) kidney transplantation (KT) to alleviate the severe organ shortage in our country. Induction therapy with basiliximab, a monoclonal anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody, is known to be effective in reducing the incidence of acute rejection (AR) after ABO-compatible KT. However, the efficacy of basiliximab in ABO-i KT is still unknown. In this study, we evaluated the effect of basiliximab to decrease overall maintenance immunosuppression (a steroid withdrawal protocol) and to improve the outcome of ABO-i KT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 2002 and May 2003, 14 adult patients underwent ABO-i KT from living donors with cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppression. There were seven men and seven women of mean age 48 +/- 10 years. Three of the 12 cases were second KT. Three sessions of plasmapheresis were performed to remove anti-AB antibodies before KT. Splenectomy was performed in all patients. Immunosuppression consisted of methylprednisolone (MP), CsA, and mycophenolate mofetil, in addition to antibody induction with basiliximab. MP was completely withdrawn on postoperative day 14. RESULTS: In 3 of 14 recipients, MP was restarted because of AR or a suspicion of AR. Both patient and graft survivals were 100%. The incidence of biopsy-proven AR was 14% (2/14). There was no adverse effect related to the antibody therapy. CONCLUSION: The use of basiliximab induction therapy may eliminate the need for steroid maintenance therapy without increasing AR risk, even among ABO-i KT recipients. We conclude that basiliximab provides safe and effective induction immunosuppression in ABO-i KT recipients.

ABO Blood-Group System↗

Immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab, a chimeric anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, in combination with azathioprine-containing triple therapy in liver transplant recipients.

Acute graft rejection remains a major problem among additional sequelae in liver transplant recipients. Basiliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody with high affinity for the CD25 chain of the interleukin-2 receptor, has significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes in renal transplant recipients. This single-arm, open-label, multicenter study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of basiliximab immunoprophylaxis in adult patients undergoing first elective liver transplantation. One hundred one patients (70 hepatitis C virus [HCV]-negative patients, 31 HCV-positive patients) were administered basiliximab, 20 mg, by intravenous bolus injection the day of transplantation (day 0) and day 4. In addition, all patients were administered triple immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine, steroids, and azathioprine. The efficacy of basiliximab was assessed by conventional parameters, and tolerability was assessed by the incidence of adverse events, infections, and laboratory test result abnormalities. At 6 months, the incidence of first acute biopsy-confirmed rejection episodes was 22.8%. Rejections were more frequent in the HCV-positive (29.0%) than HCV-negative subgroup (20.0%; P =.441). No rejection episode was graded histologically as severe, and no patient required antibody therapy for the management of acute rejection. Ten patients (9.9%) required treatment with tacrolimus for acute rejection episodes. Patient and graft survival rates at 12 months were 90.1% and 88.1%, respectively. Basiliximab caused no injection-site reactions, anaphylaxis, or cytokine release syndrome. Five malignancies were reported at 12 months: of these, three malignancies predated transplantation surgery. Compared with earlier studies, the addition of basiliximab immunoprophylaxis to triple immunosuppressive therapy provides increased efficacy in reducing the incidence of acute rejection episodes, with no clinically significant increase in adverse events.

Adult↗

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Induction therapy reduces the frequency of acute rejection and delayed graft function after transplantation. A rabbit antithymocyte polyclonal antibody or basiliximab, an interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, is most commonly used for induction. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, international study, we compared short courses of antithymocyte globulin and basiliximab in patients at high risk for acute rejection or delayed graft function who received a renal transplant from a deceased donor. Patients taking cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone were randomly assigned to receive either rabbit antithymocyte globulin (1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight daily, 141 patients) during transplantation (day 0) and on days 1 through 4 or basiliximab (20 mg, 137 patients) on days 0 and 4. The primary end point was a composite of acute rejection, delayed graft function, graft loss, and death. RESULTS: At 12 months, the incidence of the composite end point was similar in the two groups (P=0.34). The antithymocyte globulin group, as compared with the basiliximab group, had lower incidences of acute rejection (15.6% vs. 25.5%, P=0.02) and of acute rejection that required treatment with antibody (1.4% vs. 8.0%, P=0.005). The antithymocyte globulin group and the basiliximab group had similar incidences of graft loss (9.2% and 10.2%, respectively), delayed graft function (40.4% and 44.5%), and death (4.3% and 4.4%). Though the incidences of all adverse events, serious adverse events, and cancers were also similar between the two groups, patients receiving antithymocyte globulin had a greater incidence of infection (85.8% vs. 75.2%, P=0.03) but a lower incidence of cytomegalovirus disease (7.8% vs. 17.5%, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients at high risk for acute rejection or delayed graft function who received a renal transplant from a deceased donor, induction therapy consisting of a 5-day course of antithymocyte globulin, as compared with basiliximab, reduced the incidence and severity of acute rejection but not the incidence of delayed graft function. Patient and graft survival were similar in the two groups. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00235300 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Acute Disease↗

Basiliximab (Simulect) for the treatment of steroid-resistant rejection in pediatric liver transpland recipients: a preliminary experience.

BACKGROUND: The role of interleukin-2 receptor antibodies as rescue therapy in steroid-resistant rejection (SRR) has not been studied. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of an interleukin-2 receptor antibody, basiliximab (Simulect, Novartis, East Hanover, NJ), in treating SRR in pediatric liver transplant recipients. METHODS: This was a prospective study of seven pediatric liver transplant recipients with biopsy-proven SRR who would have otherwise received OKT3 or antithymocyte globulin. The primary immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine (Neoral, Novartis), azathioprine, and prednisolone in four patients and tacrolimus and prednisolone in three patients who had undergone retransplantation for chronic rejection (n=2) and hyperacute rejection (n=1). Four patients had received two cycles of high-dose steroids, and three patients had received a single cycle; all had been converted to tacrolimus, followed by the addition of mycophenolate mofetil. RESULTS: The median time from transplant to SRR was 30 days (range, 8 days-23 months). Five children received two doses of basiliximab (10 mg, 3-7 days apart), and two children received a single dose. Aspartate aminotransferase levels normalized in three children 12, 21, and 30 days after basiliximab treatment. Aspartate aminotransferase levels decreased without normalizing in two children, but there was no further evidence of cellular rejection on repeat biopsies. All five children are rejection-free with a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 5-32 months). Biochemical abnormalities persisted in the remaining two children, and both developed chronic rejection. There were no immediate side effects associated with basiliximab. Two patients were treated empirically for possible cytomegalovirus infection 21 and 57 days after basiliximab treatment, with no evidence of cytomegalovirus disease. CONCLUSION: Five of seven pediatric liver transplant recipients with SRR experienced successful outcomes with basiliximab treatment without major side effects, indicating that it is a safe alternative to OKT3 and other antilymphocyte antibodies.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗