Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “BIOPSIES”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Ultrasound-guided biopsies of neuroendocrine metastases. Comparison of 0.9 and 1.2 mm biopsy-gun needle biopsies.

Twenty-five patients with known neuroendocrine tumour disease were biopsied with 1.2 mm and 0.9 mm biopsy-gun needles to evaluate the respective diagnostic accuracy of the 2 needle sizes. The influence of treatment-related fibrosis on the histopathological diagnosis was also evaluated. The overall diagnostic accuracy with the 0.9 mm needle was 69% as compared to 92% with the 1.2 mm needle. This difference, however, seems more related to needle guiding difficulties with the 0.9 mm needle than to insufficient tissue yield. When the tumour was hit with both the 0.9 and the 1.2 mm needle the tissue yield was inferior with the 0.9 mm needle in only one of 16 cases. The increased amount of fibrous tissue due to interferon treatment did not seem to negatively influence the diagnostic accuracy.

Adult↗

Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of 14-gauge automated biopsy and 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy for the sonographically guided core biopsies of breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all sonographically guided core biopsies performed from January 2002 to February 2004. The sonographically guided core biopsies were performed with using a 14-gauge automated gun on 562 breast lesions or with using an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device on 417 lesions. The histologic findings were compared with the surgical, imaging and follow-up findings. The histologic underestimation rate, the repeat biopsy rate and the false negative rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A repeat biopsy was performed on 49 benign lesions because of the core biopsy results of the high-risk lesions (n = 24), the imaging-histologic discordance (n = 5), and the imaging findings showing disease progression (n = 20). The total underestimation rates, according to the biopsy device, were 55% (12/22) for the 14-gauge automated gun biopsies and 36% (8/22) for the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device (p = 0.226). The atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) underestimation (i.e., atypical ductal hyperplasia at core biopsy and carcinoma at surgery) was 58% (7/12) for the 14-gauge automated gun biopsies and 20% (1/5) for the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsies. The ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) underestimation rate (i.e., ductal carcinoma in situ upon core biopsy and invasive carcinoma found at surgery) was 50% (5/10) for the 14-gauge automated gun biopsies and 41% (7/17) for the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsies. The repeat biopsy rates were 6% (33/562) for the 14-gauge automated gun biopsies and 3.5% (16/417) for the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsies. Only 5 (0.5%) of the 979 core biopsies were believed to have missed the malignant lesions. The false-negative rate was 3% (4 of 128 cancers) for the 14-gauge automated gun biopsies and 1% (1 of 69 cancers) for the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsies. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of the sonographically guided core biopsies performed with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device were better than those outcomes of the biopsies performed with the 14-gauge automated gun in terms of underestimation, rebiopsy and the false negative rate, although these differences were not statistically significant.

Adolescent↗

Can Power Doppler enhanced transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy improve prostate cancer detection on first and repeat prostate biopsy?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of Power Doppler enhanced transrectal ultrasound (PD-TRUS) and its guided prostate biopsies in men with prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels between 2.5 and 10 ng/ml and to evaluate its impact on prostate cancer (PCa) detection in men undergoing first and repeat biopsies. METHODS: A total of 136 consecutive referred men with serum total PSA (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) levels between 2.5 and 10 ng/ml (mean age 64 +/- 9 years, range 45-82) and a normal digital rectal examination were included. 101 underwent a first biopsy whereas 35 had repeat biopsy. Gray-scale transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and PD-TRUS (B&K Medical, Denmark) were performed in lithotomy position before and during the biopsy procedure. Vascularity accumulation and perfusion characteristics were recorded and graded as normal or abnormal in the peripheral zone of the prostate. A Vienna-nomogram based biopsy regime was performed in all patients on first biopsy and a special biopsy regime on repeat biopsy plus additional biopsies from abnormal sites on PD-TRUS. RESULTS: Overall PCa detection rate was 34.7% and 25.7% and abnormal accumulation on PD-TRUS was identified in 42.3% and 48.6% on first and repeat biopsy, respectively. The PCa detection rate, on first and repeat biopsy in patients with and without PD-TRUS accumulation were 67.4% versus 10.3% (p < 0.001) and 47.05% versus 5.6% (p = 0.0049), respectively. PD-TRUS directed biopsies were positive in 5.7% and 11.1% on first and repeat biopsy whereas PCa detection using the routine prostate biopsy regime was 94.3% and 88.9% on first and repeat biopsy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of PD-TRUS signal alone for PCa detection on first biopsy was 82.8%, 78.8%, 87.9% and 89.7%, respectively, and 88.8%, 68.0%, 47.0% and 94.4% on repeat biopsy, respectively. In comparison, the results PD-TRUS guided biopsies were 53.8%, 59.1%, 16.7%, and 89.5%, on first biopsy, respectively, and 20.0%, 13.3%, 23.5%, 11.1% on repeat biopsy, respectively. CONCLUSION: Negative PD-TRUS signal is able to exclude most of the patients without PCa in the PSA range of 2.5-10 ng/ml. As an additional tool at TRUS biopsy PD-TRUS has a high negative predictive value and may help to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies.

Adenocarcinoma↗

CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy: a comparison between automated biopsy gun and fine needle aspiration.

AIMS: We retrospectively investigated the diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of transthoracic core biopsy using an automated biopsy gun and compared the findings with those of aspiration needle biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients underwent 74 core biopsy procedures and 50 patients underwent 52 aspiration biopsy procedures. Of these, a final diagnosis was obtained in 107 lesions with surgery or clinical course. Fifteen patients in which a final diagnosis was not obtained were excluded from the study on diagnostic accuracy. Thus, in the study of diagnostic accuracy, 63 core biopsy procedures for 62 lesions are included. Core biopsy was performed with an 18 G cutting needle using an automated biopsy gun. Aspiration biopsy was performed with a 20 G aspiration needle. RESULTS: Core biopsy yielded sufficient material in 57/63 procedures (90.5%). A correct diagnosis was obtained in 36 procedures (85.7%) for malignant leisons and a specific benign diagnosis was obtained in 11 procedures (52.4%). Aspiration biopsy yielded a correct diagnosis in 26 procedures (81.3%) for malignant leisons and in seven (46.7%) for benign lesions. The overall correct diagnosis were 75.8% and 71.7% with core biopsy and aspiration biopsy, respectively. Core biopsy gave a higher predictive rate than that of aspiration biopsy for both benign and malignant lessons (P < 0.02). Pneumothorax occurred in 18/74 (24.3%) patients with core biopsy and in 18/45 (40.0%) patients with aspiration biopsy. Of these, three with core biopsy and two with aspiration biopsy needed tube drainage. The other complication was haemoptysis, which occurred in six patients following core biopsy and in three after aspiration biopsy. All nine cases subsided spontaneously. There were no fatal complications. CONCLUSIONS: Core biopsy with a biopsy gun increase the diagnostic accuracy with a higher histologic predictive rate and no obvious additional risk of complications.

Biopsy, Needle↗

Predictors of cancer in repeat extended multisite prostate biopsy in men with previous negative extended multisite biopsy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the factors influencing the cancer detection rate in men whose initial and repeat biopsies were both performed using an extended multisite biopsy scheme. Sextant biopsy of the prostate is associated with a significant false-negative rate, as evident from the high cancer detection rate after repeat prostate biopsy. Extended multisite biopsy schemes have therefore been recommended to maximize cancer detection. METHODS: Between June 1997 and August 2001, 939 men underwent prostate biopsy for early detection of prostate cancer using the extended multisite scheme (10 or 11 cores incorporating the anterior horn of the peripheral zone with or without midline peripheral zone and/or the transition zone). Of these 939 men, 89 (9.5%) underwent a repeat extended multisite prostate biopsy. The median prostate-specific antigen level was 6.9 ng/mL (range 0.7-36.1). Twenty-four men (27%) had an abnormal digital rectal examination at presentation. Most men (86%) in the group undergoing repeat biopsy had two or more risk factors for a positive biopsy. The median interval between biopsies was 4 months. RESULTS: Of the 89 men, 15 (17%) had prostate cancer in the repeat biopsy specimen. Seven cancers (47%) were found only in the alternate biopsy sites, 5 (33%) cancers were found only in the sextant sites, and 3 in both sextant and alternate sites. Cancer was present in only one biopsy core in 11 (73%) of the 15 men, and the median Gleason score was 6 (range 6-8). On multivariate analysis, the presence of atypical glands suspicious for carcinoma (AGSC) was the only independent predictor of cancer in repeat biopsy (P <0.004). Of the 79 men without AGSC in the initial biopsy, 8 (10%) had a positive repeat biopsy. The total and percent free prostate-specific antigen level, digital rectal examination, ultrasound findings, and presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia were not predictive of cancer detection. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of a positive result for a repeat prostate biopsy is lower after an initial extended multisite biopsy compared with an initial sextant biopsy. The presence of AGSC was the only significant predictor of cancer in the repeat biopsy. Because nearly 50% of cancers detected in the repeat biopsy were in alternate sites only, using a sextant biopsy scheme for repeat biopsy would have missed these cancers.

Adult↗

Parasagittal biopsies add minimal information in repeat saturation prostate biopsy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcome and efficacy of lateral biopsies with parasagittal biopsies in detecting prostate cancer during repeated biopsies performed using the "saturation" technique, which includes 24 cores per biopsy. Prostate biopsy may miss cancer in up to 38% of men eventually found to harbor the disease. Lateral biopsies are more likely than parasagittal biopsies to detect adenocarcinoma according to the findings of several studies. METHODS: A total of 100 patients, average age 62.1 +/- 7.9 years, underwent repeated transrectal ultrasound-guided saturation biopsy. The study group included 31 patients with previous biopsy results demonstrating high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, 7 with atypia, and 62 with benign prostatic tissue but persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen levels. Patients had undergone an average of 1.65 previous biopsies. The average prostate-specific antigen level was 9.4 +/- 6.8 ng/mL. Biopsies were obtained from five sectors on each side and examined histologically. RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 25 (25%) of the 100 patients. Malignancy was identified in the lateral cores of all patients with positive biopsies. Parasagittal biopsy cores were positive in association with a lateral-based biopsy in 9 (36%) of the 25 malignancies, for an overall parasagittal biopsy core rate of 9% (9 of 100 patients). No cancers were detected in the parasagittal biopsy cores alone. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of parasagittal zone biopsy cores proved to have a low yield in detecting cancer on repeated biopsy. As all patients found to have cancer in the parasagittal biopsy cores also had cancer on the lateral biopsy cores, most time and effort can be spent obtaining lateral biopsy cores to increase the sensitivity on repeated saturation biopsy.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Transurethral biopsy of the prostate for persistently elevated or increasing prostate specific antigen following multiple negative transrectal biopsies.

PURPOSE: Treatment of the patient with persistently elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels after pathologically negative transrectal or manually directed prostate needle biopsy is unclear. We retrospectively evaluated the use of transurethral biopsy of the prostate as an adjunctive study for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1993 through February 1996, 71 patients underwent transurethral biopsy in conjunction with repeat prostatic needle biopsy for a persistently elevated PSA (greater than 4 ng./ml.) after previously negative needle biopsy. All patients had at least 1 previous ultrasound guided sextant prostatic needle biopsy (mean 1.85, range 1 to 7) with or without manually directed biopsies. Following negative prostatic needle biopsy these patients subsequently underwent a minimum of a 4-quadrant transurethral sampling of the prostatic fossa followed by repeat sextant prostatic needle biopsy. A subset of patients underwent sampling of the anterior prostatic tissue or transition zone using transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic needle biopsy at transurethral biopsy. RESULTS: Of the 71 patients with elevated PSA (mean 16.2 ng./ml., range 4.2 to 171) 17 (24%) had prostate cancer on the repeat prostatic needle biopsy. Both patients who had prostate cancer on the transurethral biopsy specimens also had prostate cancer on the repeat prostatic needle biopsy specimens. A total of 68 patients had benign prostatic tissue and 1 had high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on transurethral biopsy specimens. Of 19 patients with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on the initial prostatic needle biopsy, transurethral biopsy specimens revealed no prostate cancer or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Repeat prostatic needle biopsy in these patients with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia revealed prostate cancer in 6 and high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in 4. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistently elevated or increasing serum PSA after a previously negative prostatic needle biopsy, transurethral biopsy is not a useful adjunct in diagnosing prostate cancer. In this high risk group of patients transurethral biopsy adds little or no diagnostic value to prostatic needle biopsy even in those with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Adult↗

Extended prostate needle biopsy improves concordance of Gleason grading between prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We examined the concordance of Gleason scores in prostate needle biopsy specimens and the corresponding radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens in a cohort of patients grouped according to the number of cores obtained during diagnostic needle biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed clinical and pathological data on a cohort of 466 men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer by needle biopsies who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy between January 1, 1990 and July 31, 2001. Two study groups were identified, including 126 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer by extended needle biopsies (10 or more cores) and 340 diagnosed with cancer by nonextended needle biopsies (9 or fewer cores). Mean age was 60 years and median prostate specific antigen was 5.8 ng./ml. The median number of cores in the extended and nonextended biopsy groups was 12 and 6, respectively. The concordance of Gleason score in the needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimens was compared and correlated with the number of cores on needle biopsy. RESULTS: In the whole cohort 311 patients (67%) had identical Gleason scores on the needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimens, while 53 (11%) were over graded and 102 (22%) were under graded on needle biopsy. In patients who underwent extended needle biopsies the accuracy rate for Gleason scoring was 76% with 10% over and 14% under graded. The highest accuracy rates were in patients with 13, 14 and 16 cores (89%, 87% and 100%, respectively). No patients in the extended needle biopsy group had a discrepancy of more than 2 Gleason units in grade in the biopsy and surgical specimens. In those who underwent nonextended needle biopsies the accuracy rate for Gleason scoring was 63% with 12% over and 25% under graded. There were significantly different rates of accuracy (p = 0.008) and under grading (p = 0.01) in the 2 needle biopsy groups. Patients with a needle biopsy Gleason score of less than 7 had significantly higher concordance with the prostatectomy Gleason score when extended biopsies were done compared with nonextended biopsies (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prostate cancer grading by extended needle biopsy is a better predictor of the final Gleason score than nonextended needle biopsy, as determined by radical prostatectomy histological evaluation. Therefore, extended prostate needle biopsy provides better guidance to determine the appropriate treatment in patients with prostate cancer.

Biopsy, Needle↗

Random systematic sextant biopsy versus power doppler ultrasound-guided target biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: positive rate and clinicopathological features.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of power Doppler ultrasound (PDU)in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, the rate of detection of cancer with PDU-guided target biopsy and sextant biopsy, the clinicopathological features of cancer positive specimens, and the relation between these two findings were studied. METHODS: From January 1998 through March 2000, 302 men suspected to have prostate cancer underwent sextant biopsy in association with additional PDU-guided target biopsy. Cases with positive biopsy results were divided into 9 groups as follows: T0: sextant biopsy was positive, but target biopsy was negative; S0: all sextant biopsies were negative, but target biopsy was positive; S1 approximately S6: both sextant biopsy and target biopsy were positive (number indicates number of positive sextant biopsy); Tx: sextant biopsy was positive, but no target biopsy was performed owing to a lack of echogenic abnormalities. The Gleason score (GS) and percent organ confined disease (%OCD) were compared between these 9 groups. RESULTS: Cancer was pathologically detected in 143 of 302 patients (47.4%). PDU detected 39 of 49 digital rectal examination-negative cancers (79.6%) and 5 of 13 transrectal ultrasound-negative isoechoic cancers (38.5%). Of 143 biopsy-positive cases, 6 were in the T0 group (4.2%), 10 in S0 (7.0%), 119 in S1 approximately S6 (83.2%), and 8 in Tx (5.6%). Target biopsy missed 14 (sum of T0 and Tx) cancers, and sextant biopsy missed 10 (S0). The average GS in the Tx group was significantly lower than that in the other groups; consequently, the %OCD was significantly higher. Retrospective analysis revealed that the failure to obtain cancer tissue in 4 of the 6 cases in the T0 group is most likely due to technical failure in obtaining specimens. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of PDU were 90.2%, 77.4%, 78.2%, 89.8% and 83.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: PDU in association with sextant biopsy is a useful tool for increasing the rate of detection of prostate cancer. Further advances in ultrasound technology may enable the detection of prostate cancer by target biopsy alone and consequently may reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies. However, PDU-guided target biopsy alone is insufficient for cancer detection at the present time because of possible technical failure in obtaining specimens and the existence of PDU-negative cancer. Although more evidence is required, PDU-negative cancer is suggested to be less aggressive clinically, possibly justifying a watch and wait policy.

Aged↗

Repeat biopsy strategies for men with atypical diagnoses on initial prostate needle biopsy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate trends in prostate sampling and the efficacy of different sampling methods to detect prostate cancer in subsequent biopsies after an initial "atypical" biopsy. METHODS: We searched Dianon Systems from March 1994 to June 1996 for cases with an initial atypical diagnosis on biopsy and that had repeat biopsies. The files of Dianon and Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) were also analyzed for cases with an initial atypical diagnosis on sextant biopsy and for repeat sextant biopsies showing cancer. RESULTS: Of the 1 24 Dianon cases in which we knew the site (sextant, left, right) of the initial and subsequent biopsies, 56 cases (45.2%) were cancer on repeat biopsy; in cases with repeat sextant biopsies, cancer was detected 59.3% of the time. There were 54 cases in which the initial biopsy was atypical and the repeat biopsy was cancer, where both sets of biopsies were sextants (44 Dianon, 10 JHH). Of the 46 cases with only one initial atypical site, the cancer was in the same sextant site as the previously atypical biopsy in 47.8% of cases; cancer was detected in 84.8% of the cases in either the same sextant, adjacent ipsilateral, or adjacent contralateral sites. CONCLUSIONS: Great variation exists in how urologists sample prostates both initially and after an atypical diagnosis. Of the 149 Dianon cases, only 32 were sextant to sextant biopsies, and another 32 were consistently left and right to left and right. Our study shows that in subsequent biopsies after an atypical biopsy, the chance of detecting cancer greatly increases with biopsy not only of the atypical site, but adjacent contralateral and adjacent ipsilateral areas as well. We advocate the precise labeling of the initial biopsies so that rebiopsy of atypical cases can be directed in a more concentrated fashion into the region of the initial atypical biopsy. Other sites should be biopsied as well, which urologists did not always do, because cancer may also be found away from the initial atypical site.

Biopsy, Needle↗

Impact of prior biopsy scheme on pathologic features of cancers detected on repeat biopsies.

The object of our study was to characterize the biopsy features of cancers detected in a repeat biopsy population stratified on the basis of the type of prior negative biopsy. We studied 218 patients with a prior negative biopsy who underwent a 10-core extended systematic biopsy scheme, and a subset (n = 139) underwent additional 6 anteriorly directed biopsies. Clinicopathologic features of patients with cancer on the biopsy were compared as a function of type of prior negative biopsy. Overall and unique cancer detection rates were calculated for each of the biopsy sites. Cancer detection rates tended to be higher in patients who had undergone a prior sextant biopsy compared to a prior extended biopsy scheme (39% vs. 28%). Trends towards more positive cores and greater total core length of cancer involvement were seen in patients who had undergone a prior negative sextant biopsy. Apical and laterally directed biopsies had higher overall and unique cancer detection rates in patients who had undergone a prior negative sextant biopsy. Anteriorly directed biopsies had a low unique cancer detection rate in all patients. We conclude that in patients undergoing repeat biopsy, the detection rate is affected by the extent of the prior biopsy. Clinicopathologic features of cancers detected on repeat biopsy tend to be worse in patients who have undergone a prior negative sextant biopsy compared to a negative prior extended biopsy.

Aged↗

Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy with conventional systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection.

PURPOSE: We performed a prospective study to determine whether a limited biopsy approach with contrast enhanced color Doppler ultrasound targeted biopsy of the prostate would detect cancer as well as gray scale US guided systematic biopsy with a larger number of biopsy cores. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 230 male screening volunteers with a total prostate specific antigen of 1.25 ng./ml. or greater and free-to-total prostate specific antigen less than 18%. Two independent examiners evaluated each subject and a single investigator performed 5 or fewer contrast enhanced targeted biopsies into hypervascular regions in the peripheral zone during intravenous infusion of the US contrast agent Levovist (Schering, Berlin, Germany). Subsequently another examiner performed 10 systematic prostate biopsies. The cancer detection rates of the 2 techniques were compared. RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 69 of the 230 patients (30%), including 56 (24.4%) by contrast enhanced targeted biopsy and in 52 (22.6%) by systematic biopsy. Cancer was detected by targeted biopsy alone in 17 patients (7.4%) and by systematic biopsy alone in 13 (5.6%). The overall cancer detection rate by patient was not significantly different for targeted and systematic biopsy (p = 0.58). The detection rate for targeted biopsy cores (10.4% or 118 of 1,139 cores) was significantly better than for systematic biopsy cores (5.3% or 123 of 2,300 cores, p <0.001). Contrast enhanced targeted biopsy in a patient with cancer was 2.6-fold more likely to detect prostate cancer than systematic US guided biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy detected as many cancers as systematic biopsy with fewer than half the number of biopsy cores. Although an increase in cancer detection was achieved by combining targeted and systematic techniques in this screening population, contrast enhanced targeted biopsy alone is a reasonable approach for decreasing the number of biopsy cores.

Adult↗

[Can indexes based on PSA determine which patients should undergo repeated ultrasound-guided transrectal prostatic biopsy? Study on 546 patients who underwent repeated biopsy].

OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is the most effective test for prostate cancer diagnosis, but its sensitivity is not higher than 80% so that biopsy repetition must be considered in patients with persistent diagnostic doubts after a previous negative one. However, the majority will be negative as it happened in the first biopsy and the percentage of normal biopsies increases successively. Various indexes based on PSA are proposed to determine which patients have a higher risk of cancer detection by biopsy. We evaluate the efficacy of PSA density (PSAD), free/total PSA ratio (F/T PSA) and PSA velocity (PSAV) to select patients with high PSA and previous negative biopsy. METHODS: 546 patients who underwent more than one prostate biopsy were included in the study. 121 patients underwent 3 biopsies, 25 underwent 4 biopsies and 7 five biopsies, for a total of 1245 biopsies. Patients already diagnosed of prostate cancer who had received treatment, and postoperative urethrovesical anastomosis biopsies were excluded. Between 4 and 6 samples were obtained; transitional zone was included if previous biopsy was negative; sextant biopsy was repeated in high grade PIN, and 4 or 5 cores were taken from the affected side in cases with non conclusive glandular atypia. The relationship between PSAD, PSAV and F/T PSA and the diagnosis of cancer was evaluated, as well as its sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. RESULTS: 21.2% patients presented cancer on 2nd biopsy and 26% overall. Mean age was 68.3 years (51-84). Patients with cancer and negative biopsy showed significant differences in F/T PSA and PSAD, but not in PSAV. Sensitivities for PSAD higher than 0.15 ng/ml/ml, F/T PSA lower than 0.18 and PSAV higher than 0.75 ng/ml/year were 0.89, 0.9 and 0.49 respectively and specificities were 0.28, 0.2 and 0.4 respectively. ROC curve areas were calculated for these indexes being 0.63 for F/T PSA, and 0.47 for PSAV. CONCLUSIONS: Although their specificity is low, free to total PSA ratio and PSA density showed the highest sensitivity; PSAV is almost non valid to discriminate the result in the biopsy. Although we could slightly diminish the number of repeat biopsies loosing a few tumors, only the urologist can determine when biopsies should be repeated in patients with elevated PSA, taking into consideration all concurrent factors (Baseline status, age, risk-benefit ratio of new biopsies...).

Aged↗

Use of ultrasound and cystoscopically guided pancreatic allograft biopsies and transabdominal renal allograft biopsies: safety and efficacy in kidney-pancreas transplant recipients.

The use of allograft biopsies to guide treatment after solid organ transplantation is a valuable tool in the detection and treatment of rejection. Prior development and use of the cystoscopically guided pancreatic allograft biopsy have allowed for more accurate and timely diagnosis of pancreatic allograft dysfunction, possibly contributing to our 1-year pancreas graft, renal allograft and patient survival rates of 87.1%, 88.5% and 96.8%, respectively. We reviewed our experience, examining efficacy and complication rates of pancreas and kidney biopsies in 31 cadaveric pancreas or combined kidney and pancreas transplants performed between June 1990 and February 1992 with at least 1 year of followup. There were 94 pancreas, 54 kidney and 53 duodenal mucosal biopsies in 29 evaluable patients. This biopsy technique uses a 24.5F side-viewing nephroscope to view the cystoduodenostomy, with the duodenum acting as a portal for biopsy needles into the pancreas. Pancreatic tissue is obtained with either an 18 gauge, 500 mm. Menghini aspiration/core needle or an 18 gauge, 500 mm. Roth core needle. Percutaneous renal allograft biopsies are performed independently or simultaneously with the pancreas biopsies using a 16 gauge spring loaded needle. Pancreas biopsies were prompted by clinical indications of rejection (decreased urinary amylase, increased serum amylase or increased serum creatinine) or by protocol (10, 21 and 40 days postoperatively). Among the biopsies 30% were required by protocol, of which 10 (36%) revealed abnormal pathological findings and 5 (18%) showed evidence of occult cellular rejection. Renal biopsies demonstrated rejection in 69% of the cases. Of simultaneous pancreas/kidney biopsies 33% revealed concomitant rejection. A total of 88 Menghini needles with 170 passes was used in 73 biopsy attempts, yielding 126 tissue cores with a 16% complication rate. A total of 41 Roth needles was used with 73 passes in 34 biopsy attempts, yielding 55 tissue cores with a complication rate of 21%. Complications included self-limited bleeding from the biopsy site in 13% of the cases, bleeding requiring clot evacuation and fulguration in 1% and asymptomatic hyperamylasemia in 12%. Renal biopsy complications included 1 arteriovenous fistula (2%). We conclude that ultrasound and cystoscopically guided pancreatic allograft biopsy and percutaneous renal allograft biopsies are safe and essential methods of obtaining tissue for histological diagnosis without serious sequelae. The Menghini and Roth needles in cystoscopically guided pancreatic allograft biopsy have similar yield and complication rates in obtaining pancreatic tissue, although they require different performance techniques. In some cases both needles are necessary and are complementary in obtaining adequate tissue.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Abdomen↗

Extensive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in patients with previous benign sextant biopsies.

PURPOSE: Standard sextant prostate biopsy may underestimate cancer in men in whom clinical findings are suspicious for localized prostate cancer. We describe our experience with extensive transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in men in whom previous sextant biopsy was negative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 1997 and March 1999, 57 men 47 to 72 years old (mean age 61.4) underwent extensive transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate using intravenous sedation at our institution. An average of 22.5 cores (range 15 to 31) were obtained depending on prostate size. Biopsies were obtained from each of 6 sagittal regions, including samples from the far lateral and mid transitional zones. Each patient had undergone at least 1 previous benign transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsy (mean 2.1, range 1 to 4). Indications for repeat biopsy were persistently elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) in 89% of the cases, increased PSA velocity in 63%, suspicious free-to-total PSA in 39% and a previous suspicious biopsy finding in 32%. Clinical factors (PSA, PSA velocity, free-to-total PSA and previous suspicious biopsy) were analyzed for the ability to predict positive biopsy, and tumor parameters were assessed pathologically in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Adenocarcinoma was identified in 17 of the 57 men (30%). Biopsy revealed a Gleason score of 6 to 8 (mean 6.4). In 7 of the 17 patients (41%) in whom cancer was identified only 1 biopsy core was positive. Of the 15 patients in whom previous sextant biopsy had demonstrated high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical small acinar proliferation extensive biopsy revealed cancer in 7 (47%). Although serum PSA was higher and free-to-total PSA was lower in those with cancer, the only statistically significant predictor of positive biopsy was PSA velocity (p <0.001). Prostate cancer was noted in 64% of the men with PSA velocity 1 ng./ml. or greater. Of the 13 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy pathologically significant disease was identified in all but 1 (92%). Complications of extensive biopsy included urinary retention in 6 patients and limited rectal bleeding in 1. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive prostate biopsy identifies significant prostate cancer in many men in whom previous sextant biopsy was benign. This procedure should be considered when findings are suspicious for adenocarcinoma despite previously negative sextant biopsy.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Lateral biopsies added to the traditional sextant prostate biopsy pattern increases the detection rate of prostate cancer.

Urologists routinely use the systematic sextant needle biopsy technique to detect prostate cancer. However, recent evidence suggests that this technique has a significant sampling error and data based upon whole-mounted step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens using a three-dimensional computer-assisted prostate biopsy simulator suggests that an increased detection rate is possible using laterally placed biopsies. The simulated 10-core biopsy pattern (traditional sextant biopsy cores and four laterally placed biopsies in the right and left apex and mid portion of the prostate gland) was shown to be superior to the traditional sextant biopsy. The objective of this pilot study was to confirm the higher prostate cancer detection rate obtained using the 10-core biopsy pattern in patients. We reviewed data on 35 consecutive patients with a pathologic diagnosis of prostate cancer biopsied by a single urologist using the 10-core biopsy pattern. The frequency of positive biopsy was determined for each core. Additionally, the sextant and 10-core prostate biopsy patterns were compared with respect to prostate cancer detection rate. Of the 35 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, 54.3%(19/35) were diagnosed by the sextant biopsy only. The 10-core pattern resulted in an additional 45.7%(16/35) of patients being diagnosed solely with the laterally placed biopsies. The laterally placed biopsies had the highest frequency of positive biopsies when compared to the sextant cores. In conclusion, biopsy protocols that use laterally placed biopsies based upon a five region anatomical model are superior to the routinely used sextant prostate biopsy pattern. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2000) 3, 43-46

Journal Article↗

Diagnostic accuracy and charge-savings of outpatient core needle biopsy compared with open biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors.

We performed a prospective study of sixty-two patients who were managed with a closed core needle biopsy in an outpatient clinic for a soft-tissue mass or a bone tumor with soft-tissue extension between August 1, 1992, and June 1, 1994. Eight (13 percent) of the closed core needle biopsies yielded no neoplastic tissue. Two needle biopsies (3 percent), which were of myxomatous masses, did not allow distinction between a benign and a malignant neoplasm; both masses were extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcomas. Additionally, the histological grade of four resected specimens (6 percent) differed from that determined with the closed needle biopsy. The diagnostic accuracy of the closed needle biopsies was 84 percent (fifty-two of sixty-two). All ten diagnostic errors involved soft-tissue tumors. A retrospective study of a similar cohort of patients who had open biopsy in an outpatient operating room by the same surgeon in a contemporary period in the same institution and with analysis by the same pathologist, revealed a diagnostic accuracy of 96 percent (forty-eight of fifty). The hospital charges for the closed core needle biopsy were $1106, compared with $7234 for the open biopsy. We concluded that core needle biopsy can be performed in an outpatient clinic with use of local anesthesia and that it is substantially less expensive and more convenient than open biopsy. This technique has an acceptable but definitely lower rate of accuracy compared with open biopsy, especially for soft-tissue tumors, and it should be used only in a small subset of patients (those who have a large soft-tissue mass or a bone tumor with palpable soft-tissue extension). However, given the small size of the tissue sample, the clinician must recognize possible disadvantages, including a non-diagnostic biopsy, an indeterminate biopsy, or a potential error in the histological grade. These problems are much more likely to occur after core needle biopsy of soft-tissue masses. Because of the potential for errors in diagnosis when core needle biopsy is used, the musculoskeletal oncologist must rely on his or her clinical acumen. When a diagnosis is in reasonable doubt, there is no radiographic confirmation, the biopsy shows no tumor cells, or there is a combination of these findings, operative decisions should be made as if no biopsy had been performed. The management of patients who, after core needle biopsy, have a diagnosis of a bone or soft-tissue tumor, is best carried out by an experienced musculoskeletal oncologist working in close collaboration with an experienced musculoskeletal pathologist.

Ambulatory Care↗

One 10-core prostate biopsy is superior to two sets of sextant prostate biopsies.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficiency of different transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy techniques for detecting prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 81 prostates from radical prostatectomy were used and two consecutive sets of sextant biopsies and one 10-core biopsy taken in each specimen. The 10-core biopsy consisted of a sextant biopsy and four cores from the far lateral areas of the prostate. To simulate a transrectal biopsy procedure, all biopsies were taken under TRUS guidance. RESULTS: In the first set of sextant biopsies 44 prostate cancers (54%) were detected and in the second set 51 (63%). Combining both sets of sextant biopsies 57 (70%) of the carcinomas were detected. One set of 10-core biopsies detected 66 (82%) of all prostate cancers. Overall, with the 10-core biopsies 16% more prostate tumours were diagnosed than with two consecutive sets of sextant biopsies. To find the same number of prostate cancers as with the 10-core technique, 14% of patients undergoing sextant biopsy would require a second set and 11% at least a third set of biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: The 10-core prostate biopsy technique is superior to the commonly used sextant technique and could spare patients unnecessary repeated biopsy. Even after including a second set of sextant biopsies, the total detection rate with these 12 biopsies was inferior to the 10-core technique.

Biopsy, Needle↗