Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Alendronate”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

A randomized clinical trial comparing oral alendronate and intravenous pamidronate for the treatment of Paget's disease of bone.

Second and third generation bisphosphonates are the treatment of choice for Paget's disease of bone. These drugs are more effective than calcitonin and etidronate, but there have been no head to head, randomized controlled trials comparing potent bisphosphonates. We conducted a 2-year, randomized, open-label trial comparing oral alendronate and intravenous pamidronate in 72 subjects with Paget's disease. Randomization was stratified according to baseline plasma total alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and previous bisphosphonate treatment (yes or no). All previously treated patients had received pamidronate but not alendronate. Assigned treatments were pamidronate (60 mg) every 3 months as a single infusion or alendronate (40 mg) daily in 3-month blocks, continued until biochemical remission (defined as both ALP and urine deoxypyridinoline (DPD)/creatinine ratio in the reference range) or a clear plateau effect was observed. At 1 year, nonresponders to pamidronate were crossed over to alendronate treatment. At 1 year, 31/36 (86%) subjects randomized to alendronate achieved biochemical remission compared with 21/36 (56%) for pamidronate (P = 0.017). There was a significantly greater reduction in ALP (P < 0.001) and DPD/creatinine ratio (P < 0.001) for alendronate compared with pamidronate treatment. In previously untreated patients, alendronate resulted in remission in 20/22 (91%) subjects compared with 19/22 (86%) of pamidronate-treated subjects, which was not significantly different; however, alendronate resulted in a significantly greater reduction in ALP (P = 0.014) and DPD/creatinine ratio (P < 0.001). In previously treated patients, alendronate resulted in remission in 11/14 (79%) subjects compared with 2/14 (14%) for pamidronate (P < 0.001), with a significantly (P < 0.001) greater reduction in both ALP and DPD/creatinine ratio. Of subjects crossed over from pamidronate to alendronate, 10/14 (71%) achieved remission, including 9/11 (82%) previously treated patients. We conclude that, in patients with previously untreated Paget's disease of bone, alendronate and pamidronate have similar efficacy in achieving biochemical remission. In patients previously treated with pamidronate, alendronate is more effective.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

Effects of alendronate combined with hormone replacement therapy on osteoporotic postmenopausal Chinese women.

To evaluate the effect of alendronate combined with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on postmenopausal osteoporotic Chinese women living in Taiwan, we treated 151 women (age range, 47-70 years; mean, 61 years) with conjugated equine estrogen (0.625 mg), medroxyprogesterone 5 mg, and elemental calcium 500 mg daily with either alendronate 10 mg (n = 79) or placebo (n = 72), and measured their bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and hip every 6 months for 3 years. Urine N-telopeptide of type I collagen corrected by concentration of urine creatinine (NTx/Cr) and serum osteocalcin (OC) concentration was also measured at weeks 2, 4, and every 3 months from month 3 for 2 years. Significantly higher percentage increases in BMD at the lumbar spine (P < .0001, 2-way analysis of variance) throughout the 36-month treatment period were found in the alendronate plus HRT group than in the HRT-only group. However, there was no difference in BMD at the femoral neck and trochanter between these 2 groups. Treatment with alendronate plus HRT resulted in a 10.1% increase at the L-spine BMD and a 7.7% increase at the trochanter BMD at the end of the 3-year study period (P < .01, compared with baseline at both sites). A significant decline in urine NTx/Cr was observed at week 4 in the alendronate plus HRT group, whereas in the HRT-only group, a significant decline in urine NTx/Cr occurred at month 9. By the end of 24 months, urine NTx/Cr decreased by 49.7% in the alendronate plus HRT group (P = .001 compared with a 20.4% increase in the HRT group). A significant decline in serum OC level occurred at month 3 in the alendronate plus HRT group, whereas a similar decline was observed at month 6 in the HRT-only group. By the end of 24 months, serum OC decreased by 52.2% in the alendronate plus HRT group (P < .001 compared with a 1.5% increase in the HRT-only group). Subjects treated with alendronate plus HRT had a significantly greater percentage decrease in urine NTx/Cr (P = .0001) and serum OC (P = .0007) than subjects treated with HRT only throughout the 24-month treatment period by 2-way analysis of variance comparison. There was no difference in upper gastrointestinal or drug-related side effects between groups. In conclusion, our data suggest that the use of alendronate combined with HRT for 3 years was well tolerated and it significantly increased BMD at the L-spine and hip in postmenopausal Chinese women with osteoporosis. This regimen is safe and can be used in subjects who have no satisfactory response to a single agent or who have very low BMD with multiple risks. However, this study does not indicate whether HRT plus alendronate has any greater effect on BMD than alendronate alone.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Alendronate/interleukin-1beta cotreatment increases interleukin-6 in bone and UMR-106 cells: dose dependence and relationship to the antiresorptive effect of alendronate.

Aminobisphosphonates inhibit bone resorption but have been shown to elicit acute-phase-like elevations in interleukin-6 (IL-6) in bone in vitro. The current studies were carried out to determine the relationship between the antiresorptive effects of the aminobisphosphonate alendronate and its effects on IL-6. Resorption was elicited in cultured 19-day fetal rat limb bones by 72 h treatment with interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta). Bone mass was quantitated at the end of the culture period to assess resorption. IL-6 was determined by bioassay (7TD1 cell proliferation). IL-1beta (18 and 180 pM) stimulated bone resorption and increased IL-6. Alendronate (70 microM) inhibited the IL-1beta-stimulated resorption. Alendronate alone did not affect IL-6 production by the bones. The IL-6 production from bones stimulated with 18 pM IL-1beta was not significantly affected by alendronate, but the IL-6 production from bones stimulated with 180 pM IL-1beta plus alendronate (21 and 70 microM) was higher than with IL-1beta alone. Indomethacin (1 mM) inhibited the IL-6 increase elicited by 180 pM IL-1beta and the enhanced IL-6 production elicited by cotreatment with IL-1beta and alendronate. Since bone cultures contain multiple cell types, further experiments were carried out to determine whether alendronate could increase IL-1beta-stimulated IL-6 production in an osteoblast cell line, UMR-106. Alendronate alone did not affect IL-6 in UMR-106 cells. Alendronate (70 microM) in combination with IL-1beta (180, 1.8, or 8 nM), or 7 microM alendronate, in combination with 8 nM IL-1beta, significantly increased IL-6 in 48 h cell cultures. The results from the bone organ cultures show that alendronate can enhance IL-6 production elicited by higher concentrations of the cytokine IL-1beta in bone, but that this effect on IL-6 does not prevent the inhibitory actions of alendronate on bone resorption. The results with the UMR106 cells indicate that one cellular site at which this enhancement of IL-6 production can occur is the osteoblast.

Alendronate↗
PubMed1999

Pharmacokinetics of alendronate.

Alendronate (alendronic acid; 4-amino-1-hydroxybutylidene bisphosphonate) has demonstrated effectiveness orally in the treatment and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis, corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis and Paget's disease of the bone. Its primary mechanism of action involves the inhibition of osteoclastic bone resorption. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of alendronate must be interpreted in the context of its unique properties, which include targeting to the skeleton and incorporation into the skeletal matrix. Preclinically, alendronate is not metabolised in animals and is cleared from the plasma by uptake into bone and elimination via renal excretion. Although soon after administration the drug distributes widely in the body, this transient state is rapidly followed by a nonsaturable redistribution to skeletal tissues. Oral bioavailability is about 0.9 to 1.8%, and food markedly inhibits oral absorption. Removal of the drug from bone reflects the underlying rate of turnover of the skeleton. Renal clearance appears to involve both glomerular filtration and a specialised secretory pathway. Clinically, the pharmacokinetics of alendronate have been characterised almost exclusively based on urinary excretion data because of the extremely low concentrations achieved after oral administration. After intravenous administration of radiolabelled alendronate to women, no metabolites of the drug were detectable and urinary excretion was the sole means of elimination. About 40 to 60% of the dose is retained for a long time in the body, presumably in the skeleton, with no evidence of saturation or influence of one intravenous dose on the pharmacokinetics of subsequent doses. The oral bioavailability of alendronate in the fasted state is about 0.7%, with no significant difference between men and women. Absorption and disposition appear independent of dose. Food substantially reduces the bioavailability of oral alendronate; otherwise, no substantive drug interactions have been identified. The pharmacokinetic properties of alendronate are evident pharmacodynamically. Alendronate treatment results in an early and dose-dependent inhibition of skeletal resorption, which can be followed clinically with biochemical markers, and which ultimately reaches a plateau and is slowly reversible upon discontinuation of the drug. These findings reflect the uptake of the drug into bone, where it exerts its pharmacological activity, and a time course that results from the long residence time in the skeleton. The net result is that alendronate corrects the underlying imbalance in skeletal turnover characteristic of several disease states. In women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, for example, alendronate treatment results in increases in bone mass and a reduction in fracture incidence, including at the hip.

Alendronate↗
PubMed2006

The cost-effectiveness of therapy with teriparatide and alendronate in women with severe osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: Teriparatide is a promising new agent for the treatment of osteoporosis. METHODS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of teriparatide-based strategies compared with alendronate sodium for the first-line treatment of high-risk osteoporotic women. We developed a microsimulation with a societal perspective. Key data sources include the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures, the Fracture Intervention Trial, and the Fracture Prevention Trial. We evaluated postmenopausal white women with low bone density and prevalent vertebral fracture. The interventions were usual care (UC) (calcium or vitamin D supplementation) compared with 3 strategies: 5 years of alendronate therapy, 2 years of teriparatide therapy, and 2 years of teriparatide therapy followed by 5 years of alendronate therapy (sequential teriparatide/alendronate). The main outcome measure was cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). RESULTS: For the base-case analysis, the cost of alendronate treatment was 11,600 dollars per QALY compared with UC. The cost of sequential teriparatide/alendronate therapy was 156,500 dollars per QALY compared with alendronate. Teriparatide treatment alone was more expensive and produced a smaller increase in QALYs than alendronate. For sensitivity analysis, teriparatide alone was less cost-effective than alendronate even if its efficacy lasted 15 years after treatment cessation. Sequential teriparatide/alendronate therapy was less cost-effective than alendronate even if fractures were eliminated during the alendronate phase, although its cost-effectiveness was less than 50,000 dollars per QALY if the price of teriparatide decreased 60%, if used in elderly women with T scores of -4.0 or less, or if 6 months of teriparatide therapy had comparable efficacy to 2 years of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Alendronate compares favorably to interventions accepted as cost-effective. Therapy with teriparatide alone is more expensive and produces a smaller increase in QALYs than therapy with alendronate. Sequential teriparatide/alendronate therapy appear expensive but could become more cost-effective with reductions in teriparatide price, with restriction to use in exceptionally high-risk women, or if short courses of treatment have comparable efficacy to that observed in clinical trials.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Response to alendronate in osteoporosis after previous treatment with etidronate.

Bisphosphonates such as etidronate and alendronate are widely accepted as effective agents for the treatment of osteoporosis. However, some physicians find the choice of which one to use in different patients, and the comparative magnitude of response, unclear. Fifty postmenopausal women with osteoporosis [group 1: 27 women who had received 3 years of previous cyclical etidronate treatment, mean age 70.5 years, bone mineral density (BMD) mean T-score lumbar spine (LS) -3.58 and femoral neck (FN) -2.51; group 2: 23 women who had not previously received cyclical etidronate treatment, mean age 73.7 years, BMD mean T-score LS -3.65 and FN -2.96] were treated with 10 mg alendronate daily, to determine whether pretreatment with etidronate affected the response to alendronate, and whether patients who did not respond to etidronate, responded to alendronate. There was a significant increase in LS BMD after 2 years of treatment with alendronate compared with baseline (group 1: 7.84%, p<0.001; group 2: 6.69%, p<0.001), but there was no statistical difference between the groups. In the group 1 patients there was a significant difference between the initial response (at the LS BMD) to 2 years of cyclical etidronate (1.86%) and later response to 2 years of alendronate (7.84%) (p<0.0001). The 10 patients who did not respond at the LS to etidronate alone, showed a significantly better response (mean BMD change +6.3%) when subsequently treated with alendronate (a net difference of 9.3%, p=0.002). In 15 patients who did not respond at the FN to etidronate alone, the mean response to alendronate was +0.96% (a difference of 7%, p= 0.004). This study shows that pretreatment with 3 years of cyclical etidronate is not detrimental to the subsequent LS BMD response to alendronate. There is evidence that alendronate produced a greater bone density response than etidronate, and patients who did not respond to etidronate with an increase in LS bone density, subsequently did so following alendronate.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1995

Alendronate distributed on bone surfaces inhibits osteoclastic bone resorption in vitro and in experimental hypercalcemia models.

Alendronate is an aminobisphosphonate that acts as a potent inhibitor of osteoclastic bone resorption. To understand the mechanism of action of alendronate in vivo, in this study we investigated the relationship between distribution of [14C]-alendronate in rat bone and its effects on bone resorption in vitro or in rat hypercalcemic models. A single IV dose of 0.05 approximately 1.25 mg/kg inhibited the increase in plasma calcium level induced by bovine PTH or 1 alpha(OH)D3. The minimal effective dose of pamidronate (1.25 mg/kg) and etidronate (over 31.25 mg/kg) were at least 5 times and 25 times, respectively, higher than the dose of alendronate in the rat hypercalcemic model prepared by 1 alpha(OH)D3. The relative potencies of compounds in the hypercalcemic rat models reflected those of inhibitory effects on bone resorption in vitro. We conducted the ivory-slice assay under two conditions: (a) addition of a given bisphosphonate after adherence of the osteoclasts; and (b) preincubation of the ivory slices with a given bisphosphonate. The inhibitory IC50 values of alendronate under condition (b) were similar to those under condition (a). To evaluate the interaction between osteoclasts and alendronate in bone, we investigated the localization of [14C]-alendronate in the tibia of growing rats (4-day-old rats). Alendronate did not distribute uniformly in the tibia. At 1 day after injection (0.05 mg SC), dense labeling was seen primarily under osteoclasts. We injected 0.05 mg/kg of [14C]-alendronate (single i.v.) into rats [14C]-alendronate was rapidly eliminated from plasma, and mainly distributed to the bone in rats. These data suggest that alendronate which distributed on bone surface mainly contributed to the antihypercalcemic action in vivo.

Alendronate↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of modal damping factor as a diagnostic tool for osteoporosis and its relation with serum osteocalcin and collagen I N-telopeptide for monitoring the efficacy of alendronate in ovariectomized rats.

Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease characterized by reduced bone mass and deterioration of bone microarchitecture. It results from the shift of the osteoblast-osteoclast activity equilibrium in favor of the later. Although, a number of biochemical markers, such as collagen I N-telopeptide (NTx) and osteocalcin (OC), have been used for monitoring bone remodeling, a new, monitoring, non-invasive method, which is based on the measurement of the dynamic characteristic of bone and is known as modal damping factor (MDF), has not been evaluated as a diagnostic tool for osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates, such as alendronate, have an established role in the treatment of osteoporosis. The aim of the present study was, therefore, to evaluate the effects of alendronate on the levels of MDF, serum NTx and OC on osteoporosis induced by ovariectomy in rats. Furthermore, the effects of alendronate on osteoporosis have been histologically evaluated. Fifteen adult female Wistar rats were bilaterally ovariectomized and osteoporosis was histologically confirmed and by the use of peripheral quantitative computerized tomography (pQCT). MDF was applied to assess the bone structural integrity. The serum levels of NTx (37.4+/-0.5 nM bone collagen equivalents, BCE) and OC (111.0+/-8.2 ng/mL) were found to significantly increase following ovariectomy (72.0+/-2.9 nM BCE and 213.5+/-12.1 ng/mL, respectively, p<0.001). As assessed by histology and the levels of NTx and OC in sera, animals treated with alendronate presented a statistically significant deceleration in the progression of the disease in comparison to the no-therapy control group (alendronate group NTx levels: 146.3+/-8.9 nM BCE versus no-therapy control group NTx levels: 265.3+/-14.0 nM BCE, p<0.001, alendronate group OC levels: 205.6+/-18.2 ng/mL versus no-therapy group OC levels: 353.9+/-26.1 ng/mL, p<0.001). Data obtained from the vibration analysis performed illustrated that the change in damping was equal or greater to the change in total and trabecular density, respectively. Damping increased with decreasing bone density, as expected, given that damping accounts for the structural integrity of bone (MDF value before ovariectomy: 0.058+/-0.003 versus MDF value after ovariectomy: 0.098+/-0.003, p<0.001). The higher damping values correspond to more deteriorated structures. In particular, both total and trabecular density were significantly decreased following ovariectomy (total density before ovariectomy: 702.4+/-19.0 versus total density after ovariectomy: 542.2+/-12.8, p<0.001, trabecular density before ovariectomy: 445.3+/-13.0 versus trabecular density after ovariectomy: 396.7+/-8.4, p<0.05). MDF value of the alendronate group (0.07+/-0.002) was significantly lower (p<0.001) as compared to MDF value after ovariectomy (0.098+/-0.003) and that of the no-therapy group (0.1+/-0.004, p<0.001). The administration of alendronate seemed to have no effect on either total or trabecular density, since both parameters continued to decrease (alendronate group total density: 549.4+/-12.3, alendronate group trabecular density: 368.4+/-14.7). However, when this was compared to the no-therapy group, a statistically significant difference of total density at the 0.05 level was observed (no-therapy total density: 464.8+/-9.1). The results of this study suggest that combined measurements of MDF, NTx and OC may be a potential diagnostic tool for osteoporosis and monitoring bone integrity during treatment with bisphosphonates. Furthermore, administration of alendronate showed to offer a critical deceleration in the progression of osteoporosis.

Alendronate↗
PubMed1997

Increments in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and hip and suppression of bone turnover are maintained after discontinuation of alendronate in postmenopausal women.

PURPOSE: Previously we have reported a significant increase in bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and the hip and reductions in biochemical indices of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with alendronate at various doses over 1 to 2 years. We have followed BMD and biochemical parameters in these patients for 1 or 2 years after discontinuation of alendronate to determine resolution of alendronate effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants received daily oral doses of placebo, 5 or 10 mg of alendronate for 2 years, or 20 or 40 mg of alendronate for 1 year followed by 1 year of placebo. No treatment was given in the third year of study. RESULTS: Lumbar spine BMD changes in the 5- and 10-mg groups (-1.4 and -0.4%) were similar to those in the placebo group (-1.2%) 1 year after discontinuation of drug and lumbar spine BMD changes in the 20- and 40-mg groups (-1.2% and 0.8%) were similar to those in the placebo group (-0.9%) 2 years after discontinuation of drug. BMD of the total hip followed the same pattern of resolution. The difference in BMD between alendronate and placebo groups at the end of alendronate treatment was maintained up to 2 years. Residual reductions in the bone resorption markers urinary deoxypyridinoline (D-Pyr) and collagen type 1 cross-linked N telopeptides and the bone formation markers serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin remained for 1 year after discontinuation of 5 and 10 mg of alendronate and for 2 years after discontinuation of 20 and 40 mg of alendronate, other than return of D-Pyr to baseline 1 year after cessation of treatment with the 5- and 10-mg doses. CONCLUSIONS: A residual decrease in bone turnover may be found up to 2 years after discontinuation of alendronate. Accelerated bone loss is not observed when treatment is discontinued. However, continuous therapy with alendronate is required to achieve a continuous gain in BMD.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Alendronate inhibition of protein-tyrosine-phosphatase-meg1.

Alendronate (4-amino-1-hydroxybutylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate) is a potent bisphosphonate that inhibits osteoclastic bone resorption and has proven effective for the treatment of osteoporosis. Its molecular mechanism of action, however, has not been defined precisely. Here we report that alendronate is a potent inhibitor of the protein-tyrosine-phosphatase-meg1 (PTPmeg1). Two substrates were employed in this study: fluorescein diphosphate and the phosphotyrosyl peptide src-pY527. With either substrate, alendronate was a slow binding inhibitor of PTPmeg1. Among the other bisphosphonates studied, alendronate was more potent and selective for PTPmeg1. The hydrolysis of fluorescein diphosphate by PTP epsilon and PTPmeg1 was sensitive to alendronate, with IC50 values of less than 1 microM; PTPsigma, however, under the same conditions, was inhibited by only 50% with 141 microM alendronate. Similarly, with the src-pY527 substrate, alendronate inhibition was also PTP dependent. Alendronate inhibited PTPmeg1 with an IC50 value of 23 microM, PTPsigma with an IC50 value of 2 microM, and did not inhibit PTP epsilon at concentrations up to 1 mM. The alendronate inhibition of these three PTPs and two substrates is consistent with the formation of a ternary complex comprised of enzyme, substrate, and inhibitor. PTP inhibition by hisphosphonates or vanadate was diminished by the metal chelating agent EDTA, or by the reducing agent dithiothreitol, suggesting that a metal ion and the oxidation of a cysteine residue are required for full inhibition. These observations show substrate- and enzyme-specific PTP inhibition by alendronate and support the possibility that a certain PTP(s) may be the molecular target for alendronate action.

Alendronate↗
PubMed2003

Alendronate affects long bone length and growth plate morphology in the oim mouse model for Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

Alendronate, a bisphosphonate drug, has shown promise in reducing remodeling and bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Alendronate acts directly on the osteoclast, inhibiting its resorption capability. This inhibition of osteoclast activity has led to the use of bisphosphonates in the treatment of the osteogenesis imperfecta condition. Treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta with bisphosphonates enhances bone strength, but the consequences on linear bone growth are not well defined. Using the oim mouse model for type III osteogenesis imperfecta, two doses of alendronate, low (0.125 mg/kg/wk) and high (2.5 mg/kg/wk) were administered weekly via intraperitoneal injection starting at 4 weeks of age and ending at 12 weeks of age to assess the effects of alendronate on humerus and ulna length. The higher dose of alendronate reduced humerus and ulna length in the oim/wt and wt/wt genotypes for both sexes (P < 0.05). The oim/oim humerus and ulna were not significantly affected by the higher dose of alendronate in females, but reduced bone length in males (P < 0.0085). Proximal humerus growth plate area was affected by both genotype and alendronate dose and growth plate diameter was increased at the chondro-osseous junction by both alendronate doses (P < 0.011). Genotype and alendronate dose affected growth plate height. The oim/oim genotype displayed taller growth plates. The high dosage of alendronate increased overall growth plate height, particularly within the hypertrophic zone, which suggests a failure of vascular invasion-induced apoptosis in the hypertrophic cells. In conclusion, these results indicate that high doses of alendronate (>2.5 mg/kg/wk) inhibit long bone length in mice through alteration of the growth plate and possibly reduced resorption at the chondro-osseous junction.

Alendronate↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Impact of alendronate on quality of life in children with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a debilitating clinical condition characterized by fragile bone and skeletal deformity. Over the past decade frequent reports have suggested that the cyclical administration of intravenous pamidronate has a positive impact on bone density and skeletal fractures; however, the impact of such therapy on the quality of life (QOL) has rarely been reported. Alendronate, an oral bisphosphonate, is widely used to treat osteoporosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of daily alendronate on QOL and bone parameters in children with OI. A prospective double-blind crossover study was designed in which placebo was alternated with daily alendronate. Twenty children with types I, III, and IV OI were recruited. Seventeen patients completed the study. Markers of QOL were measured in children with type III and IV OI (n = 15) using total mobility (PEDI), self-care (WeeFIM), well-being, pain, and use of analgesic scores. After 1 year of alendronate therapy, vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) improved from a change in standard deviation score (z-score) of 0.89 +/- 0.19 to -0.12 +/- 0.14 after 1 year of placebo (P < 0.001). All QOL markers, except for mobility score, improved in response to alendronate therapy. Change in height z-score also improved in response to 1 year of alendronate therapy (0.41 +/- 0.21 vs. -0.09 +/- 0.11, P < 0.05). Alendronate therapy did not alter serum levels of calcium, osteocalcin, parathyroid hormone (PTH), 1, 5 (OH)2 vitamin D, cholesterol, or urinary hydroxyproline or any other biochemical marker evaluated. Alendronate decreased by 56% urinary cross-linked N-telopeptide of type 1 collagen divided by urinary creatinine (uNTX/uCr). Daily alendronate therapy was well tolerated. Only two patients had mild gastrointestinal discomfort, responding to minor adjustments in alendronate intake. Daily alendronate therapy is safe and effective in improving QOL in children with OI.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

The upper GI safety and tolerability of oral alendronate at a dose of 70 milligrams once weekly: a placebo-controlled endoscopy study.

OBJECTIVE: Alendronate (10 mg daily) has been shown in long term clinical trials to be an effective treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. A weekly dosing regimen of alendronate is preferred by both patients and physicians, as it has the potential to provide greater convenience and enhance compliance. In a 1-yr clinical trial, alendronate (70 mg once weekly) was equally efficacious and at least as well tolerated as the 10-mg daily dose in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, despite the higher unit dosage required. We conducted a randomized, double blind, placebo- and active-controlled endoscopy study to confirm the results of this clinical trial. We hypothesized that mean endoscopic gastric erosion scores would be similar in subjects receiving alendronate (70 mg once weekly) and those receiving a placebo. METHODS: Two hundred seventy-seven subjects (90 men and 187 women) were randomized to one of three treatment groups: 1) alendronate (70 mg once weekly) for 10 wk (N = 126), 2) placebo (once weekly) for 10 wk (N = 126), or 3) placebo (once weekly) for 10 wk followed by aspirin (650 mg q.i.d.) for the last week as the positive control (N = 25). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed 5 to 7 days after the last dose of alendronate or matching placebo. RESULTS: The mean gastric erosion scores (Lanza scale) were similar in subjects given alendronate (70 mg once weekly) and those given a placebo (0.32 vs 0.35, respectively; 95% CI for difference = -0.22-0.16, p = 0.75), whereas scores in both groups were significantly lower than in those given aspirin (3.09; p < 0.001). Endoscopic gastroduodenal ulcers occurred in no alendronate (0%), two placebo (1.7%), and five aspirin (23.8%) subjects. The mean erosion scores in the esophagus and duodenum of alendronate and placebo subjects were also similar. The incidences of upper GI symptoms were similar in the alendronate and placebo subjects and did not suggest a relationship with endoscopic lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Alendronate (70 mg once weekly) was not associated with any increase in endoscopic lesions in the upper GI tract relative to a placebo.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

The effect of raloxifene after discontinuation of long-term alendronate treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover in patients receiving long-term alendronate therapy who continued alendronate, were switched to raloxifene, or discontinued antiresorptive therapy. DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Ninety-nine ambulatory women who were diagnosed with postmenopausal osteoporosis and treated with alendronate (10 mg/d) for a mean period of 43 months were randomized to double-blind raloxifene (60 mg/d; n = 33), placebo (n = 33), or continuation of open-label alendronate (n = 33) for 12 months. Patients continued their assigned treatment in a subsequent 12-month, open-label extension phase. All patients received supplemental calcium (500 mg/d) and vitamin D (800 IU/d). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BMD (lumbar spine, total femur, femoral neck, distal forearm, and total body) and biochemical markers (serum intact amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen, type 1 collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide, and osteocalcin) were measured at baseline and follow-up visits. RESULTS: Discontinuation of alendronate therapy resulted in a decrease in lumbar spine BMD at 12 months (-2.66%; P < 0.05), but did not change total femur BMD (+0.35%; nonsignificant). Raloxifene and alendronate, compared with discontinuation, prevented lumbar spine BMD loss (-0.75% and -0.54% at 12 months, respectively; P < 0.05). Raloxifene and alendronate caused a similar increase in total femur BMD at 12 months (1.45% and 1.56%; both P < 0.05 vs. baseline; nonsignificant vs. discontinuation). Patients, who discontinued alendronate therapy experienced an increase in bone turnover. Bone turnover increases were less pronounced in patients taking raloxifene and were absent in those who continued alendronate. Of the three groups, mean bone turnover in raloxifene patients was the closest to premenopausal mean values. CONCLUSIONS: BMD preservation and increase were most pronounced in patients continuing alendronate. Raloxifene treatment, compared with placebo, demonstrated beneficial effects on BMD and bone turnover after discontinuation of long-term alendronate therapy.

Alendronate↗
PubMed2004

Prevention of bone loss in paraplegics over 2 years with alendronate.

UNLABELLED: To assess the effects of long-term treatment of bone loss with alendronate in a group of paraplegic men, 55 patients were evaluated in a prospective randomized controlled open label study that was 2 years in duration comparing alendronate and calcium with calcium alone. Bone loss was stopped at all cortical and trabecular infralesional sites (distal tibial epiphysis, tibial diaphysis, total hip) with alendronate 10 mg daily. INTRODUCTION: Bone loss after spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to increased fracture risk in the lower limbs of paraplegics. The aim of this study was to document long-term treatment of bone loss with alendronate in a group of paraplegic men with complete motor lesion after SCI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five men with complete motor post-traumatic medullary lesion between T1 and L2 with total motor and sensory loss (Frankel classification, stage A) or with total motor and partial sensory loss (Frankel classification, stage B) after SCI were included in this prospective randomized controlled open label study that was 2 years in duration. The patients were randomized to either the treatment group with alendronate 10 mg daily and elemental calcium 500 mg daily or to the control group with elemental calcium 500 mg daily alone. The primary endpoint was defined as the effect over 24 months of alendronate and calcium compared with calcium alone on the BMD values at the distal tibial epiphysis (as a surrogate for trabecular bone in the paralyzed zone). The secondary endpoints were changes in BMD at supra- and infralesional sites of measurement. Biochemical markers of bone turnover were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-five subjects, 0.1-29.5 years post-SCI, completed the study over 24 months. BMD at the distal tibial epiphysis significantly decreased from baseline in the calcium group (-10.8 +/- 2.7% at 24 months, p < 0.001), whereas it remained stable in the alendronate plus calcium group (-2.0 +/- 2.9% at 24 months, p = not significant versus baseline), leading to a significant intergroup difference over time (p = 0.017). At the tibial diaphysis, similar significant results were observed. At the ultradistal radius and the radial shaft, BMD did not change significantly from baseline in either treatment group. At the total hip, BMD decreased significantly in the calcium group (-4.1 +/- 1.6%, p = 0.038) but remained stable in the alendronate plus calcium group (+0.43 +/- 1.2%), with a significant intergroup difference (p = 0.037). At the lumbar spine, BMD increased significantly (p < 0.0001) from baseline in both groups. Biochemical markers of bone resorption were significantly decreased with alendronate versus baseline and control. Alendronate and calcium were generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In paraplegic men, SCI bone loss was stopped at all measured cortical and trabecular infralesional sites over 24 months with alendronate 10 mg daily.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Treatment with once-weekly alendronate 70 mg compared with once-weekly risedronate 35 mg in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized double-blind study.

UNLABELLED: Once-weekly alendronate 70 mg and once-weekly risedronate 35 mg are indicated for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. These two agents were compared in a 12-month head-to-head trial. Greater gains in BMD and greater reductions in markers of bone turnover were seen with alendronate compared with risedronate with similar tolerability. INTRODUCTION: The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, alendronate and risedronate, are available in once-weekly (OW) formulations for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. A 12-month, head-to-head study was performed to compare these agents in the treatment of postmenopausal women with low BMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1053 patients from 78 U.S. sites were randomized to OW alendronate 70 mg (N = 520) or risedronate 35 mg (N = 533), taken in the morning after fasting. Endpoints included BMD changes over 6 and 12 months at the hip trochanter, total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine (LS); percent of patients with predefined levels of change in trochanter and LS BMD at 12 months; and change in biochemical markers of bone turnover at 3, 6, and 12 months. Tolerability was evaluated by adverse experience (AE) reporting. RESULTS: Significantly greater increases in hip trochanter BMD were seen with alendronate (3.4%) than risedronate (2.1%) at 12 months (treatment difference, 1.4%; p < 0.001) as well as 6 months (treatment difference, 1.3%; p < 0.001). Significantly greater gains in BMD were seen with alendronate at all BMD sites measured (12-month difference: total hip, 1.0%; femoral neck, 0.7%; LS, 1.2%). Significant differences were seen as early as 6 months at all sites. A greater percentage of patients had > or =0% (p < 0.001) and > or =3% (p < 0.01) gain in trochanter and spine BMD at 12 months with alendronate than risedronate. Significantly greater (p < 0.001) reductions in all biochemical markers of bone turnover occurred with alendronate compared with risedronate by 3 months. No significant differences were seen between treatment groups in the incidence of upper gastrointestinal AEs or AEs causing discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: In this 12-month, head-to-head trial of alendronate and risedronate, given in accordance with the approved OW regimens for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, alendronate produced greater gains in BMD and greater reductions in markers of bone turnover than risedronate. The greater antiresorptive effect of alendronate was seen as early as 3 months, and the tolerability profiles were similar.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Effects of alendronate on bone quality and remodeling in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a histomorphometric analysis of transiliac biopsies.

Effects of alendronate (ALN) on bone quality and turnover were assessed in 88 patients (52 women and 36 men aged 22-75 years) who received long-term oral glucocorticoid exposure. Patients were randomized to receive oral placebo or alendronate 2.5, 5, or 10 mg/day for 1 year and stratified according to the duration of their prior glucocorticoid treatment. Transiliac bone biopsies were obtained for qualitative and quantitative analysis after tetracycline double-labeling at the end of 1 year of treatment. As previously reported in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, low cancellous bone volume and wall thickness were noted in the placebo group as compared with normal values. Alendronate treatment was not associated with any qualitative abnormalities. Quantitative comparisons among the four treatment groups were performed after adjustment for age, gender, and steroid exposure. Alendronate did not impair mineralization at any dose as assessed by mineralization rate. Osteoid thickness (O.Th) and volume (OV/BV) were significantly lower in alendronate-treated patients, irrespective of the dose (P = 0.0003 and 0.01, respectively, for O.Th and OV/BV); however, mineral apposition rate was not altered. As anticipated, significant decreases of mineralizing surfaces (76% pooled alendronate group; P = 0.006), activation frequency (-72%; P = 0.004), and bone formation rate (-71%; P = 0.005) were also noted with alendronate treatment. No significant difference was noted between the changes observed with each dose. Absence of tetracycline label in trabecular bone was noted in approximately 4% of biopsies in placebo and alendronate-treated groups. Trabecular bone volume, parameters of microarchitecture, and resorption did not differ significantly between groups. In conclusion, alendronate treatment in patients on glucocorticoids decreased the rate of bone turnover, but did not completely suppress bone remodeling and maintained normal mineralization at all alendronate doses studied. Alendronate treatment did not influence the osteoblastic activity, which is already low in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Adult↗
PubMed2007

Matrix metalloproteinases, tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1, and laminin-5 gamma2 chain immunolocalization in gingival tissue of endotoxin-induced periodontitis in rats: effects of low-dose doxycycline and alendronate.

BACKGROUND: Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) play important roles in tissue destruction mechanisms of periodontitis. MMP-8 and -13 are the major collagenases that act in extracellular matrix degradation in periodontal tissues. MMP-14 is a membrane-type MMP, and laminin (Ln)-5 is a basal membrane component. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of doxycycline and alendronate on gingival tissue expression of MMP-8, -13, and -14; tissue inhibitors of MMP (TIMP)-1; and Ln-5 gamma2 chain in experimental periodontitis induced by Escherichia coli endotoxin (LPS) in rats. METHODS: Experimental periodontitis was induced by repeated injection of LPS. Forty-four adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into five study groups: saline control, LPS, LPS + doxycycline, LPS + alendronate, and LPS + doxycycline + alendronate. Doxycycline and alendronate were given as a single agent or as combination therapy during the 7 days of the experimental study period. On day 7, the rats were sacrificed, and the gingival tissues were analyzed immunohistochemically for expression of MMP-8, -13, and -14, Ln-5 gamma2 chain, and TIMP-1. Alveolar bone loss was evaluated morphometrically under a stereomicroscope. Data were tested statistically by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests and Spearman correlation analysis. RESULTS: Alveolar bone loss was significantly higher in the LPS, doxycycline, alendronate, and combination groups than in the saline control group (all P <0.01). MMP-8 expression was significantly higher in the LPS group than in the saline control group (P = 0.001). Individual administration of doxycycline or alendronate significantly decreased the expression of MMP-8 compared to LPS (P = 0.01). Combined drug administration reduced MMP-14 significantly compared to doxycycline (P = 0.004). No significant differences in Ln-5 gamma2 chain expression were found between the study groups (P >0.05). MMP-14 significantly correlated with the Ln-5 gamma2 chain in the LPS + alendronate group (P = 0.04) and with the amount of alveolar bone loss in the LPS + doxycycline + alendronate group (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that alendronate and/or doxycycline may inhibit MMP-8 expression significantly; particularly, their combined administration may provide beneficial effects in periodontal treatment. Moreover, individual administration of alendronate and doxycycline results in significant increases in TIMP-1 expression in gingiva. However, these effects of combined low-dose doxycycline and alendronate on MMPs and TIMP should be verified by clinical human trials before these agents are used in dental practice.

Alendronate↗