Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Acetazolamide”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

The effect of acetazolamide on ventilation in panic disorder patients.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with panic disorder are behaviorally hypersensitive to CO2 inhalation and may also be biologically hypersensitive. A report by Mathew et al. showed, however, that administration of the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor acetazolamide, which is believed to increase brain CO2 level, did not cause panic in panic disorder patients. The authors of the present study noted that respiratory frequency did not increase in the earlier experiment and wondered whether respiratory stimulation occurred during acetazolamide administration, as would be expected if CO2 level increases significantly. METHOD: Ten patients with panic disorder and six normal control subjects received injections of acetazolamide, 1 g i.v., as per the Mathew et al. protocol, during breath by breath measurement of both tidal volume and frequency of respiration. RESULTS: Three patients had panic attacks, one before receiving acetazolamide, one during the injection, and one 2 minutes after injection. Only the last of these attacks appeared possibly attributable to acetazolamide. None of the control subjects panicked. Neither patients nor control subjects exhibited meaningful change in tidal volume, respiratory frequency, or minute ventilation, and both groups experienced a trend toward significant decrease in overall levels of anxiety and dyspnea after acetazolamide injection. CONCLUSIONS: The authors replicated the earlier finding that acetazolamide is not panicogenic in patients with panic disorder but also showed that at the dose given, there is no meaningful effect on ventilation. If acetazolamide does affect CO2 levels it does so in a way that does not stimulate ventilation. Therefore, the acetazolamide injection results of Mathew et al. and of the present study do not challenge hypotheses linking panic attacks to hypersensitive respiratory control mechanisms.

Acetazolamide↗

The effect of deafferentation on cerebral blood flow response to acetazolamide.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Decreased cerebral blood flow (CBF) response after acetazolamide administration may indicate increased cerebral blood volume (CBV) owing to reduced perfusion pressure from major cerebral artery steno-occlusive disease. However, decreased cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO(2)) caused by neuronal damage or deafferentation may also decrease the CBF response to acetazolamide, which adds complexity to the assessment of autoregulatory vasodilatation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between CBF response to acetazolamide and CBV or CMRO(2) in a pure form of deafferentation, crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD). METHODS: We used positron emission tomography to study 17 patients with unilateral supratentorial infarct and contralateral cerebellar hypoperfusion. The CBF response to acetazolamide was assessed by measuring baseline CBF and CBF 10 minutes after an intravenous injection of acetazolamide. Multivariate analysis was used to test the independent predictive value of the CBV and CMRO(2) at baseline with respect to the change of CBF during acetazolamide administration. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that in CCD CBV was significantly and independently associated with the percent change of CBF during acetazolamide administration (P <.0001), whereas CMRO(2) was not. CONCLUSION: In deafferentation, changes in CBV may account for variations in CBF response to acetazolamide and decreased CMRO(2) may not affect CBF response to acetazolamide expressed as the percent change.

Acetazolamide↗

Effectiveness of generic acetazolamide.

Comparisons were made between the ocular hypotensive effects and blood levels achieved with the single-dose administration of either generic acetazolamide or brand-name acetazolamide (Diamox). The relative cost of the two products was surveyed. The effect of food on the absorption of acetazolamide was also evaluated. The generic and brand-name acetazolamide were equivalent in their effects on intraocular pressure. Comparable blood levels of acetazolamide were obtained with the two products. The cost of generic acetazolamide was 37% less than brand-name acetazolamide, when available. Food intake did not appear to influence the absorption of acetazolamide.

Acetazolamide↗

Acetazolamide blood concentrations are excessive in the elderly: propensity for acidosis and relationship to renal function.

Elderly glaucoma patients are often treated with acetazolamide, a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor with clearance dependent on renal function. A high incidence of metabolic acidosis and other adverse effects have been noted among these patients but the reasons for this have not been explained. We hypothesized that commonly used doses of acetazolamide among the elderly result in excessive blood concentrations and that these concentrations are related to acid-base disturbances. We measured steady-state acetazolamide levels in plasma, plasma ultrafiltrate (unbound), and erythrocytes among 12 elderly subjects (79.2 +/- 7.6 years old). Mean plasma (18.9 +/- 10.9 micrograms/mL) and ultrafiltrate concentrations (1.0 +/- 0.7 microgram/mL) exceeded the therapeutic range (plasma 5-10 micrograms/mL; ultrafiltrate 0.25-0.50 microgram/mL) for glaucoma control by two fold and were elevated in 75% of subjects. Plasma and ultrafiltrate acetazolamide levels significantly correlated with the dose adjusted for creatinine clearance (r = 0.91, P less than 0.001; r = 0.89, P less than 0.001, respectively). Acidotic subjects (serum total carbon dioxide less than or equal to 22 mEq/L) tended to have higher plasma, ultrafiltrate, and erythrocyte acetazolamide levels compared with nonacidotic subjects. Serum total carbon dioxide levels were significantly correlated with erythrocyte acetazolamide concentrations (r = -0.75, P = 0.03). The ratio of erythrocyte acetazolamide concentration to creatinine clearance separated acidotic from nonacidotic subjects (P less than 0.01). These findings suggest that some of the adverse effects of acetazolamide can be avoided by reducing the dose to compensate for age-related reductions in renal drug clearance.

Acetazolamide↗

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of acetazolamide in patients with transient intraocular pressure elevation.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of acetazolamide in patients with transient intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation and to provide individual patients with the optimal dosage regimen for this drug. METHODS: We studied 17 patients with transient IOP elevation, who were given 62.5-500 mg acetazolamide orally as single or repetitive doses. Plasma acetazolamide concentration and IOP were measured at approximately 1, 3, 5, and 9 h after the last acetazolamide administration. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effect modeling using the program NONMEM. RESULTS: The plasma concentration profile of acetazolamide was characterized by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption. The apparent oral clearance was related to the creatine clearance (CCR) which was estimated by the Cockcroft and Gault equation, as follows: 0.0468 x CCR1 x h(-1). The estimated apparent oral volume of distribution, first-order absorption rate constant, and absorption lag time were 0.231 l x kg(-1), 0.821 x h(-1), and 0.497 h, respectively. IOP after oral acetazolamide administration was characterized by an Emax model. The maximal effect in lowering the IOP (Emax) was 7.2 mmHg, and the concentration corresponding to 50% of the maximal effect (EC50) was 1.64 microg x ml(-1). As 70% of Emax was achieved at a plasma concentration of 4 microg x ml(-1), this concentration was considered satisfactory for lowering IOP. The recommended dosage was calculated so that the minimum plasma concentration at steady state exceeded this target concentration; 250 mg t.i.d., 125 mg t.i.d., 125 mg b.i.d., and 125 mg once daily for the patients with CCR values of 70, 50, 30, and 10 ml min(-1), respectively. CONCLUSION: Measuring plasma concentrations of acetazolamide and subsequent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses are useful for estimating its concentration-dependent effectiveness in lowering the IOP in individual patients. The dosage regimen presented in this study is expected to improve the benefits of acetazolamide pharmacotherapy in most elderly patients with transient rises in IOP following intraocular surgery.

Acetazolamide↗

Ulcer formation and cytoprotection by acetazolamide.

Acetazolamide, a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, was administered orally and subcutaneously to rats. Acetazolamide increased the gastric ulcerogenicity of indomethacin, but inhibited gastric ulcers produced by acidified aspirin. When administered alone to fasted rats, it did not produce gastric ulcers. Acetazolamide was also cytoprotective for the stomach (it reduced dose dependently the number of gastric necrotic lesions caused by absolute ethanol given orally) and for the small intestine (it prevented dose dependently intestinal lesions produced by administration of a high dose of indomethacin). Acetazolamide did not prevent the antiulcer effect of PGE2 (against aspirin-induced ulcers) nor the cytoprotective effect of 16,16-dimethyl PGE2 (against ethanol-induced gastric lesions). The degree of gastric cytoprotection increased with time after a single administration of acetazolamide; the optimal effect occurred 60 and 90 min after oral and subcutaneous administration, respectively. Pretreatment with indomethacin completely prevented the cytoprotective effect of acetazolamide; this suggests that the cytoprotective effect may be mediated by endogenous release of prostaglandins by the stomach. All the effects of acetazolamide reported here were observed after either oral or subcutaneous administration. The mechanism by which acetazolamide influences ulcer formation and is cytoprotective is unknown.

16,16-Dimethylprostaglandin E2↗

The additive effect of topical dorzolamide and systemic acetazolamide in pediatric glaucoma.

BACKGROUND: The effect of adding oral to topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in the management of pediatric glaucoma is unknown. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective analysis of children with a diagnosis of glaucoma before the age of 16 years who initially were treated with topical dorzolamide or dorzolamide-timolol combination and then treated with oral acetazolamide. Children who had uveitic glaucoma or who had ocular surgery within 3 months before or during oral acetazolamide therapy were excluded. Various methods of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement were used in the study. However, in each case, the IOP was measured using the same technique, once at the last visit before the addition of oral acetazolamide and once at the first examination after the addition of oral acetazolamide. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included in the study with an age range of 8 months to 15 years. Seventeen children were boys. Oral acetazolamide treatment was via a daily dose (13.3 to 30 mg/kg, mean 22.5 mg/kg), and duration (6 to 31 days, mean 18.1 days). The intraocular pressure (mean +/- SD) before acetazolamide (32.2 +/- 6.5 mm Hg) was significantly different than after acetazolamide (21.8 +/- 6.3 mm Hg) with a mean difference of 10.36 mm Hg (p < 0.0001) and a mean decrease in IOP of 29.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of oral acetazolamide to topical dorzolamide may provide additional reduction in IOP in some children already being treated with topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. This possible additive effect has not been observed in adults treated with a combination of topical and systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.

Acetazolamide↗

Effect of acetazolamide on cough induced by low-chloride-ion solutions in normal subjects: comparison with furosemide.

BACKGROUND: The antitussive activity of inhaled furosemide has been attributed to its blocking effect on the Na(+)-2Cl(-)-K+ cotransporter. It is likely that the antitussive activity of inhaled diuretics is more complex because amiloride, a diuretic that has no effect on the Na(+)-2Cl(-)-K+ cotransporter, also shows a significant effect against cough induced by low-chloride-ion solutions. Apart from pharmacokinetics of inhaled diuretics, this activity could also depend on the inhibition of carbonic anhydrase. OBJECTIVES: We therefore studied the effect of inhaled acetazolamide, a selective inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase activity, on cough induced by the inhalation of different chloride ion solutions in a group of normal subjects. This was compared with the antitussive effect of furosemide. In addition, we attempted to determine whether the effect of acetazolamide is dose-dependent. METHODS: Cough challenge consisted of consecutive inhalations of four solutions having decreasing concentrations of chloride ions (150, 75, 37.5 and 0 mmol/L). Nine normal subjects underwent the cough challenge 5 minutes after the inhalation of saline placebo, acetazolamide (500 mg), and furosemide (30 mg) according to a randomized, double-blind study design. A group of six subjects were challenged according to the same procedure and study design, after the inhalation of saline placebo and of two doses of acetazolamide (250 mg and 500 mg). RESULTS: Inhaled acetazolamide significantly reduced cough response to 37.5 and 0 mmol/L chloride solutions compared with placebo (p less than 0.015 and p less than 0.015, respectively). Furosemide showed a similar protective effect (p less than 0.015 and p less than 0.025, respectively). Acetazolamide provided a significantly better protective effect than furosemide (p less than 0.025 and p less than 0.015, respectively). The antitussive activity of the two doses of acetazolamide was not statistically different. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that inhaled acetazolamide, a selective inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase, attenuates cough induced by low-chloride-ion solutions in normal subjects. At the applied doses, its antitussive activity is slightly greater than furosemide. This finding suggests that the inhibition of carbonic anhydrase activity is likely involved in modulating changes caused by absence of a chloride ion in the airway microenvironment of human beings.

Acetazolamide↗

A randomized, masked, cross-over trial of acetazolamide for cystoid macular edema in patients with uveitis.

PURPOSE: To study the effect of acetazolamide on cystoid macular edema in patients with uveitis. METHODS: Forty patients with chronic intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis associated cystoid macular edema were randomized into a masked, cross-over trial comparing acetazolamide versus placebo. Patients received an initial 4-week course of either acetazolamide or placebo (course A) followed by a 4-week washout period. They then received a 4-week course of the opposite study medication (course B). Primary endpoints included area of cystoid macular edema measured on late-phase views of fluorescein angiography and visual acuity. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients completed the trial and were available for analysis; 17 (46%) were randomized to receive acetazolamide and 20 (54%) to receive placebo during course A. Acetazolamide resulted in a 0.5-disc area (25%) decrease in cystoid macular edema over that of placebo (P = 0.01; estimated treatment effect = -0.5 disc areas; 95% confidence interval, -0.9 to -0.1). However, there was no statistically significant effect of acetazolamide on visual acuity (P = 0.61; estimated treatment effect = 0.6 letters; 95% confidence interval, -2 to 3). CONCLUSIONS: A 4-week course of acetazolamide therapy results in a statistically significant but small decrease in cystoid macular edema in patients with chronic uveitis, and does not improve visual acuity. In contrast to previous studies in the literature, acetazolamide may have a more limited clinical benefit in patients with long-standing cystoid macular edema associated with chronic uveitis.

Acetazolamide↗

Combination of systemic acetazolamide and topical dorzolamide in reducing intraocular pressure and aqueous humor formation.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine whether topical dorzolamide and systemic acetazolamide have an additive effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) and aqueous humor formation (AHF). DESIGN: This was a prospective, open-label, two-protocol clinical study. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen patients with ocular hypertension or with primary open-angle glaucoma were studied. INTERVENTION: Baseline AHF was measured by computerized fluorophotometry and IOP by pneumatonometry without antiglaucoma therapy. In the first protocol, dorzolamide was randomized to one eye (N = 10) and IOP and AHF measurements were repeated. One week later, having used dorzolamide in one eye three times daily, patients had measurements performed before and after the single administration of oral acetazolamide 250 mg. In the second protocol, having used acetazolamide 250 mg four times daily for 4 to 7 days (N = 6), patients had measurements performed before and after a single drop of dorzolamide was instilled randomly into one eye. The patient continued acetazolamide and unilateral dorzolamide for 4 to 7 more days and returned for IOP and AHF measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure and AHF were measured in treated and contralateral control eyes. RESULTS: In the first protocol, IOP (mmHg +/- standard deviation) was significantly (P = 0.02) lower in the dorzolamide (16.3 +/- 2.6) than in the contralateral control (19.9 +/- 2.9) eyes. Aqueous humor formation (microliter/minute +/- standard deviation) also was lower (P = 0.02) in dorzolamide eyes (1.79 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.33 +/- 0.5). After oral acetazolamide 250 mg, IOP was unchanged in dorzolamide eyes (17.6 +/- 2.0 preacetazolamide vs. 17.9 +/- 2.0 postacetazolamide), whereas it was reduced (P = 0.003) in control eyes (20.5 +/- 2.2 preacetazolamide vs. 16.9 +/- 2.3 postacetazolamide). Aqueous humor formation was reduced in control eyes (2.31 +/- 0.8 preacetazolamide vs. 1.73 +/- 0.6 postacetazolamide; P = 0.005) but not in dorzolamide-treated eyes (1.56 +/- 0.45 preacetazolamide vs. 1.77 +/- 0.39 postacetazolamide). In the second protocol, acetazolamide 250 mg four times daily symmetrically reduced IOP and AHF in both eyes. After single-drop dorzolamide in one eye, IOP and AHF did not change significantly. After 4 to 7 days of acetazolamide and unilateral dorzolamide, IOP and AHF remained reduced to a similar level in dorzolamide and control eyes not receiving topical therapy. CONCLUSION: Topical dorzolamide and oral acetazolamide, in the concentrations and doses used in this study, are not additive. Either drug alone results in maximum reduction in IOP and AHF. Concomitant glaucoma therapy of a topical and systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitor is not warranted.

Acetazolamide↗

The effect of acetazolamide on the changes of cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism during visual stimulation.

Acetazolamide, a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, has an anticonvulsant effect which may result from a decrease in the efficacy of synaptic transmission due to a decrease of pH. Our previous study showed that acetazolamide induced a significant increase in global and regional cerebral blood flow (CBF), but caused no significant change in the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO(2)). To investigate the effect of acetazolamide on the responses of CBF and CMRO(2) during neural stimulation, we used positron emission tomography to measure CBF and CMRO(2) in six normal volunteers at the fixation-only baseline visual state and during visual stimulation before and after administration of 1 g of acetazolamide. Visual stimulation induced a significant increase in CBF (33%) in the visual cortex compared with baseline values, but caused no significant change in CMRO(2), while no significant change in global CBF or CMRO(2) was found. During visual stimulation after acetazolamide administration, both global and visual cortical CBF and CMRO(2) showed similar changes compared with the respective baseline values (37 and 65% increases in CBF and 8 and 16% decreases in CMRO(2), respectively). When corrected by the global values, the magnitudes of the CBF and CMRO(2) responses to visual stimulation after acetazolamide administration were less than those before (20% vs 38% in CBF and -9% vs 3% in CMRO(2)). Considering our previous observation that the effect of acetazolamide was similar throughout cerebral cortical regions, we suggest that acetazolamide decreases the responses of both CBF and CMRO(2) during visual stimulation, which indicates that this drug may affect neuronal excitability.

Acetazolamide↗

A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of dorzolamide and acetazolamide as adjunctive therapy to timolol. Oral to Topical CAI Study Group.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of dorzolamide to acetazolamide. METHODS: Following a timolol and acetazolamide run-in, 105 patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) were randomized to dorzolamide or acetazolamide, in addition to timolol, for 12 weeks. RESULTS: More patients receiving acetazolamide discontinued due to clinical adverse experiences than patients receiving dorzolamide; 13 (25%) vs. 1 (2%); p<0.001. The prevalence of systemic adverse experiences for the dorzolamide group dropped by 50% by Week 12, but remained unchanged for the acetazolamide group, as compared to baseline; p<0.001. Ocular burning/stinging was more common in the dorzolamide group (21% vs. 0%; p<0.001). The mean trough IOP at Day 1 and Week 12 were 20.5 mmHg and 21.8 mmHg for the dorzolamide group, and 20.4 mmHg and 20.5 mmHg for the acetazolamide group. The mean peak IOP at Dayl and Week 12 were 18.9 mmHg and 20.0 mmHg for the dorzolamide group, and 18.7 mmHg and 18.6 mmHg for the acetazolamide group. CONCLUSIONS: Mean IOP was slightly lower (by approximately 1 mmHg) with acetazolamide, while dorzolamide demonstrated much better tolerability.

Acetazolamide↗

Relationship between acetazolamide blood concentration and its side effects in glaucomatous patients.

Although acetazolamide, a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, has an effect of lowering intraocular pressure, a number of side effects have been reported. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between the concentration of acetazolamide and its side effects, including plasma electrolyte imbalance. This study was conducted on 23 glaucomatous patients who received repeated doses of oral acetazolamide for one week or more. The concentrations of total and unbound plasma acetazolamide, as well as in the whole blood from the patients, were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The serum creatinine concentration, electrolyte concentrations, and adverse reactions were monitored. We found that plasma concentrations of chloride ion after repeated doses became higher than the normal range. This chloride ion concentration significantly correlated with the acetazolamide concentration in the erythrocytes, but not with the plasma concentration. The patients with erythrocyte acetazolamide concentration more than 20 microg/ml had higher incidences of the side effects. Periodical monitoring of erythrocyte acetazolamide concentration and plasma chloride ion can be easily and safely applied to elderly glaucomatous patients treated with acetazolamide for long periods to prevent overdosage and side effects.

Acetazolamide↗

Effects on aqueous flow of dorzolamide combined with either timolol or acetazolamide.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect on aqueous flow of topical dorzolamide 2%, topical timolol 0.5%, or oral acetazolamide 250 mg when used alone or when dorzolamide is combined with either timolol or acetazolamide. METHODS: In 30 patients with ocular hypertension, aqueous flow and intraocular pressure (IOP) were determined at baseline and on the following combinations of drugs in a crossover design: (1) vehicle alone, (2) dorzolamide alone, (3) acetazolamide alone, (4) timolol alone, (5) dorzolamide + acetazolamide, and (6) dorzolamide + timolol. Treated eyes were compared with control eyes and comparisons were made between treatments. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, significant (P < 0.04) IOP reductions in the order of efficacy were: dorzolamide + timolol > dorzolamide + acetazolamide = acetazolamide = timolol > dorzolamide. Aqueous flow was reduced more by dorzolamide + timolol than by each drug alone (P < 0.04) and more by dorzolamide + acetazolamide than by dorzolamide alone (P < 0.04). CONCLUSION: The combination of dorzolamide and timolol demonstrated significant aqueous flow additivity and had greater IOP efficacy than the combination of dorzolamide and acetazolamide.

Acetazolamide↗

Antipsychotic and prophylactic effects of acetazolamide (Diamox) on atypical psychosis.

We investigated the antipsychotic and prophylactic effects of acetazolamide (Diamox) on atypical psychosis. Acetazolamide was given to 30 patients: Type I, puberal periodic psychosis, a psychosis whose onset occurs during the period of puberty and which appears repetitively with psychosis-like condition at about the same interval as the menstrual cycle (6 cases); Type II, a) presenile atypical psychosis which initially appears in patients in their 20s or 30s accompanied by manic-depressive cycles and shows acute confusional and dreamy states in the presenile period, incurable cases (7), b) atypical psychosis, in the narrow sense, cases which show acute hallucination, delusion, confusional and dreamy states accompanied by affective symptoms (8 cases); Type III, repetitively the atypical manic and depressive states, and atypical manic-depressive psychosis, and transient changes in consciousness, refractory cases (2); Type IV, atypical schizophrenia, which is considered to be schizophrenia but shows the abnormalities in electroencephalogram and emotional disorders (7 cases). Among these cases, some extent of the therapeutic effects of acetazolamide (500-1,000 mg/day) was obtained in about 70%. The high therapeutic effects were particularly observed in Types I, II and III. It was less effective against atypical schizophrenia. Acetazolamide showed the effectiveness in 10 cases out of 13 cases to which lithium carbonate and carbamazepine were ineffective. The high therapeutic effects of acetazolamide were shown in the cases whose symptoms were aggravated at the interval of the menstrual cycle. No correlation was observed between the electroencephalographic abnormalities and the therapeutic effects. In addition, the prophylactic effects of acetazolamide on the periodic crisis were observed in 9 cases. From these results, acetazolamide was considered to have the antipsychotic and prophylactic effects on atypical psychosis. Since side effects due to acetazolamide were rarely observed, the present drug was considered to have a high safety margin.

Acetazolamide↗

Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled comparison of ginkgo biloba and acetazolamide for prevention of acute mountain sickness among Himalayan trekkers: the prevention of high altitude illness trial (PHAIT).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of ginkgo biloba, acetazolamide, and their combination as prophylaxis against acute mountain sickness. DESIGN: Prospective, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial. SETTING: Approach to Mount Everest base camp in the Nepal Himalayas at 4280 m or 4358 m and study end point at 4928 m during October and November 2002. PARTICIPANTS: 614 healthy western trekkers (487 completed the trial) assigned to receive ginkgo, acetazolamide, combined acetazolamide and ginkgo, or placebo, initially taking at least three or four doses before continued ascent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence measured by Lake Louise acute mountain sickness score > or = 3 with headache and one other symptom. Secondary outcome measures included blood oxygen content, severity of syndrome (Lake Louise scores > or = 5), incidence of headache, and severity of headache. RESULTS: Ginkgo was not significantly different from placebo for any outcome; however participants in the acetazolamide group showed significant levels of protection. The incidence of acute mountain sickness was 34% for placebo, 12% for acetazolamide (odds ratio 3.76, 95% confidence interval 1.91 to 7.39, number needed to treat 4), 35% for ginkgo (0.95, 0.56 to 1.62), and 14% for combined ginkgo and acetazolamide (3.04, 1.62 to 5.69). The proportion of patients with increased severity of acute mountain sickness was 18% for placebo, 3% for acetazoalmide (6.46, 2.15 to 19.40, number needed to treat 7), 18% for ginkgo (1, 0.52 to 1.90), and 7% for combined ginkgo and acetazolamide (2.95, 1.30 to 6.70). CONCLUSIONS: When compared with placebo, ginkgo is not effective at preventing acute mountain sickness. Acetazolamide 250 mg twice daily afforded robust protection against symptoms of acute mountain sickness.

Acetazolamide↗

Bicarbonaturic effect of acetazolamide in the dog: the influence of graded volume expansion.

Studies were performed in anesthetized dogs to characterize the effect of a progressive volume expansion on the acetazolamide-induced bicarbonaturia. A closed system with urine reinfusion was used in all these experiments. In normovolemic dogs, 24% of the filtered bicarbonate was excreted into the urine while this value reached 62% when a 10% expansion was superimposed on a continuous infusion of acetazolamide. When a single dose of acetazolamide was given, fractional bicarbonate excretion increased from 21% in normovolemic dogs to 46% during 10% expansion. Without acetazolamide administration, 13% of the filtered bicarbonate was excreted during a 10% expansion. The continuous infusion of acetazolamide in normovolemic dogs increased fractional bicarbonate excretion in a progressive fashion, from 25 to 40%. This study shows that an acute volume expansion potentiates markedly the bicarbonaturic effect of acetazolamide, fractional bicarbonate excretion exceeding by far the simple additive effect of acetazolamide and expansion. We speculate that volume expansion might prevent a compensatory rise in acetazolamide-insensitive bicarbonate reabsorption in sites other than the superficial proximal convoluted tubules.

Acetazolamide↗

Pulmonary vasodilation by acetazolamide during hypoxia is unrelated to carbonic anhydrase inhibition.

Acute hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction can be inhibited by high doses of the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor acetazolamide. This study aimed to determine whether acetazolamide is effective at dosing relevant to human use at high altitude and to investigate whether its efficacy against hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is dependent on carbonic anhydrase inhibition by testing other potent heterocyclic sulfonamide carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Six conscious dogs were studied in five protocols: 1) controls, 2) low-dose intravenous acetazolamide (2 mg.kg(-1).h(-1)), 3) oral acetazolamide (5 mg/kg), 4) benzolamide, a membrane-impermeant inhibitor, and 5) ethoxzolamide, a membrane-permeant inhibitor. In all protocols, unanesthetized dogs breathed spontaneously during the first hour (normoxia) and then breathed 9-10% O(2) for the next 2 h. Arterial oxygen tension ranged between 35 and 39 mmHg during hypoxia in all protocols. In controls, mean pulmonary artery pressure increased by 8 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance by 200 dyn.s.cm(-5) (P <0.05). With intravenous acetazolamide, mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance remained unchanged during hypoxia. With oral acetazolamide, mean pulmonary artery pressure increased by 5 mmHg (P < 0.05), but pulmonary vascular resistance did not change during hypoxia. With benzolamide and ethoxzolamide, mean pulmonary artery pressure increased by 6-7 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance by 150-200 dyn.s.cm(-5) during hypoxia (P < 0.05). Low-dose acetazolamide is effective against acute hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in vivo. The lack of effect with two other potent carbonic anhydrase inhibitors suggests that carbonic anhydrase is not involved in the mediation of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and that acetazolamide acts on a different receptor or channel.

Acetazolamide↗