Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ACRYLIC RESINS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1989

[Effects of various prosthodontic strengtheners on fatigue behaviour of acrylic resins].

The fatigue behaviour of acrylic sheet specimens containing reinforcers were investigated. Three different kinds of reinforcers namely, stainless steel, aluminum reinforcer and three flex wire were used as strengtheners in acrylic resin sheets. The tests were carried out on alternating bending fatigue testing machine specially designed to test sheet specimens. By applying static and dynamic bending moments of any desired magnitude within the permissible capacity likits of the machine the fatigue lives of the specimens were determined. Experimental results showed that stainless steel strengtheners had a significant positive effect on the fatigue behaviour of acrylic resin.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of the fracture resistance of six denture base acrylic resins.

Fracture strength of denture base resins is of great concern, and many approaches have been used to strengthen acrylic resin dentures. Fracture resistance of six commercially available acrylic resin denture base materials were compared, through impact and transverse strength tests. Three rapid heat-polymerised resins (QC 20, Meliodent and Trevalon), two high-impact strength resins (Trevalon Hi and Lucitone 199) and a strengthened injection-moulded acrylic resin (SR Ivocap plus) were included in the study. Twenty acrylic resin test specimens were fabricated from each resin. For impact strength test, ten notched specimens were tested in a Charpy-type impact tester. The other ten specimens were used for transverse strength tests, deflection and modulus of elasticity values were also determined, which were assessed with three-point bending tests using an Universal Testing Machine. Impact test values showed significant differences among acrylic resins (F= 4.817 p = 0.0). SR Ivocap resin showed the highest impact strength values, followed by Trevalon Hi and Lucitone 199. The transverse strength test values were not significant when six acrylic resins were compared (F= 1.705 p = 0.151). High-impact resins can be recommended to increase the impact strength of denture base. If the cause of fracture is mechanical or anatomical, strengthened acrylic resins and conventional acrylic resins have similar fracture resistance.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1999

Disinfection of denture base acrylic resin.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: During repair or adjustments of acrylic resin removable complete and partial dentures, particles of the acrylic resin from the interior of the prosthesis may expose dental personnel to microbial health hazards if the prosthesis has not been thoroughly disinfected. PURPOSE: This study investigates the efficacy of a commercially prepared microbial disinfectant (Alcide) on the external and internal surfaces of acrylic resins. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four groups of acrylic resin were incubated in an experimental model to simulate the oral environment over time. Specimens were treated in 2 groups, disinfected and not disinfected, and then further grouped by breaking and not breaking. Analysis was performed with microbial colony counts, SEM, and statistical analyses. RESULTS: Viable microorganisms still remain on the internal and external surfaces of treated resins. CONCLUSION: Chlorine dioxide reduces, but does not eliminate, viable microorganisms on these dental prostheses.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1994

Water sorption by maxillary acrylic resin denture base and consequent changes in vertical dimension.

Many kinds of materials have been tried in the Laboratory and to some extent clinically prior to introduction of acrylic resin. With the introduction of acrylic resin as denture base material, continuous attempts have been made to evaluate its physical properties. To observe the changes in vertical measurements of acrylic resin dentures due to water sorption and to assess variations of vertical movements of individual teeth within dentures due to water sorption; present study was carried out on 25 maxillary acrylic dentures. From results, the maximum water sorption appears to take place within 24 hours and after 28 day of water sorption; there is no change in vertical dimension if the denture is placed for further more time. With the introduction of acrylic resin as denture base material continued attempts have been made to evaluate physical properties so as to determine its suitability as an ideal nonmetalic denture base materials. Several investigations have been carried out on physical properties of this material such as compressive strength, tensile strength, solubility and colour stability. These have proved their superiority over other nonmetalic denture base materials used so far. Also several studies have been carried out to assess dimensional changes that occur in acrylic resin during processing, but very few studies have been carried out about the water sorption changes in the acrylic resin and still few about the vertical dimensional changes in acrylic resin due to water sorption. While fabricating the denture base from the acrylic resin, it comes in contact with water during polishing as well as cleaning, consequently during the use of denture it is constantly wetted by oral fluids. It is the hypothesis that water sorption by denture base acrylic may effect the retention and stability of the denture. It has been shown that water molecules act according to the laws of diffusion. The diffusion presumably occurs between the macromolecules which are forced slightly apart. This separation renders the molecules mobile and the inherent stresses created during heat curing of the acrylic resin can be relieved with consequent intermolecular relaxation and possible changes in the shape of the denture. Exposure time also plays a significant role in water sorption. The present investigation was therefore, carried out by keeping the following objectives: (1) The primary objective was to observe the changes in vertical measurements of acrylic resin dentures due to water sorption. (2) To assess the variations of vertical movement of individual teeth within the dentures due to water sorption.

Absorption↗
PubMed2003

Cytotoxicity of denture base acrylic resins: a literature review.

Acrylic resins are widely used in the fabrication of denture bases and have been shown to be cytotoxic as a result of substances that leach from the resin. The primary eluate is residual monomer. Numerous reports suggest that residual monomer may be responsible for mucosal irritation and sensitization of tissues. This information is important, not only to assess the biologic effects of such materials, but also to enable a comparison among the different polymerization methods, thus assisting the clinician in selecting a material with minimal cytotoxicity. This article reviews the literature published from 1973 to 2000, selected by use of a Medline search, associated with cytotoxic effects usually ascribed to acrylic denture base materials.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2006

The effect of two fibre impregnation methods on the cytotoxicity of a glass and carbon fibre-reinforced acrylic resin denture base material on oral epithelial cells and fibroblasts.

Acrylic resin dentures may have cytotoxic effects on oral soft tissues. However, there is sparse data about the cytotoxic effect of fibre-reinforced acrylic resin denture base materials. The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effect of two fibre impregnation methods on the cytotoxicity of a glass and carbon fibre-reinforced heat-polymerized acrylic resin denture base material on oral epithelial cells and fibroblasts. One hundred acrylic resin discs were assigned to five experimental groups (n = 20). One of the groups did not include any fibre. Two groups consisted of silane and monomer treated glass fibres (Vetrolex) impregnated into acrylic resin (QC-20) discs. The other two groups consisted of silane and monomer treated carbon fibres (Type Tenox J, HTA). Untreated cell culture was used as positive control. The human oral epithelial cell line and buccal fibroblast cultures were exposed to test specimens. The cytotoxicity of the test materials was determined by succinic dehydrogenase activity (MTT method) after 24 and 72 h exposures. Data were analysed with a statistical software program (SPSSFW, 9.0). A one-way analysis of variance (anova) test and Bonferroni test were used for the comparisons between the groups. All statistical tests were performed at the 0.95 confidence level (P < 0.05). After 24 and 72 h incubation, cell viability percentages of all experimental groups showed significant decrease according to the positive control cell culture. Fibroblastic cell viability percentages of silane and monomer treated fibre-reinforced groups were lower than the unreinforced group. Cell viability of monomer-treated groups displayed the lowest percentages. Elapsed incubation time decreased epithelial cell viability in silane-treated groups. Fibroblastic cell viability was not influenced by elapsed time except the unreinforced group.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Surface roughness of denture base acrylic resins after processing and after polishing.

PURPOSE: Circumstances exist in which the need to adjust denture base acrylic resins is necessary. This process obviously alters the surface of the polished denture base. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of three chairside polishing kits and conventional polishing on four denture acrylic resins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four 30 x 30 x 2 mm acrylic resin specimens were fabricated with each of four acrylic resins: autopolymerizing, heat processed, injection molded, and microwaveable. One side was polished conventionally with pumice and polishing compound. The other side was polished with one of three chairside polishing kits: Axis, Brasseler, and Shofu. Each side was evaluated by a Dektak 8 Programmable Stylus Profiler to determine the surface roughness (Ra). RESULTS: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that: (1) There was no significant difference in the time it took to polish the specimens with the chairside polishing kits (F=2.118, p=0.14). (2) There was a significant difference in surface roughness between the acrylic resins before any polishing, with the injection-molded and heat-processed being less rough than the autopolymerizing (F=4.588, p=0.005). (3) There was a significant difference in surface roughness between the acrylic resins when conventionally polished, with the injection-molded and microwavable being less rough than the autopolymerizing (F=4.503, p=0.005). Factorial ANOVA revealed that: (1) There was no significant difference in the surface roughness among the chairside polishing kits (F=1.209, p=0.30). (2) There was a significant difference between the acrylic resins, with the heat-processed, injection-molded, and microwaveable being significantly less rough than the autopolymerizing (F=6.610, p=0.0001). (3) There was no significant interaction between the acrylic resins and the chairside polishing kit in the amount of surface roughness (F=1.728, p=0.12). An independent t-test revealed that conventional polishing was significantly smoother than polishing with the chairside polishing kits (t=3.847, p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that time was not a factor in using any of the chairside polishing kits. It is recommended that conventional polishing be used after adjustments to the cameo surface of denture acrylic resin.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1991

Effects of laboratory disinfecting agents on color stability of denture acrylic resins.

This study determined the effects of chemical disinfecting agents on denture acrylic resins. Tested resins included the products CH Lucitone, Triad VLC, and Truliner. The disinfecting agents were sodium hypochlorite, Exspor, Cidex, and Wescodyne-D. Acrylic resin samples were placed in the various disinfecting agents and then evaluated for color changes at time intervals ranging from 15 minutes to 72 hours. No observable color change of any acrylic resin was seen before 2 hours. Both 1% sodium hypochlorite and 2% Cidex disinfectants produced the least discoloration of the acrylic resins, and Wescodyne-D disinfectant produced the most acrylic resin discoloration. Truliner resin discolored more than Triad VLC resin, and both underwent more color change than CH Lucitone resin. If manufacturers' recommended disinfecting times are followed, clinical and laboratory disinfection of acrylic resin dentures should cause no observable color change.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1995

Finite element analysis of stress distribution at the tooth-denture base interface of acrylic resin teeth debonding from the denture base.

Acrylic resin teeth present a problem when they detach unexpectedly from the denture base resin. Detachment is caused by stress concentrations at the tooth/denture base resin interface. In this study, the finite element method was used to examine the stress distribution at this interface when a single static force that resembled incisal bite force was applied. The results indicated that irrespective of the type of acrylic resin teeth used, maximum tensile stresses were found at the palatal aspect of the interface. It is suggested that boxing the tooth in the acrylic resin will help redistribute stress concentrations favorably.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of bond strengths between adhesive and conventional acrylic resins to cobalt chromium denture base alloy.

In removable partial dentures there is normally no chemical bonding between the cast alloy and the poly(methylemethacrylate). Mechanical retention of the resin to the casting is required and presents a significant challenge during the design of partial dentures. Recently developed adhesive denture base resins which contain the monomer 4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride can create a chemical bond to partial denture alloys. This study investigated the bond strength of adhesive denture base resin (Metafast) and conventional acrylic resin (Croform x 10) to partial denture alloy (CoCr) under three different storage conditions (dry, water, water with thermocycling). The results showed that the bond strength of the conventional acrylic resin (Croform x 10) was less than the bond strength of the adhesive denture base resin (Metafast) and the storage environment had a significant effect upon the bond strength of both resins.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2004

The effect of reinforcement with woven E-glass fibers on the impact strength of complete dentures fabricated with high-impact acrylic resin.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The fracture of acrylic maxillary complete dentures occurs frequently during service through heavy occlusal force or accidental damage. PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to measure the impact strength of maxillary complete dentures fabricated with high-impact acrylic resin and to evaluate the effect of woven E-glass fiber-reinforcement on the impact strength of the complete dentures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Preimpregnated woven E-glass fibers (Stick Net) were used to reinforce 10 complete denture bases fabricated with a heat-polymerized high-impact acrylic resin (Lucitone 199). Ten unreinforced complete dentures served as a control group. All specimens were stored in water at 37 degrees C for 2 months before testing. The impact strengths (J) of the dentures were measured with a falling-weight impact test. The impact strengths of both groups were compared by a repeated measures analysis of variance (alpha=.05). The Weibull distribution was also applied to calculate the cumulative fracture probability as a function of impact strength. RESULTS: The mean impact strength of the control dentures was 90.0+/-38.1 J at crack initiation, and 95.9+/-37.7 J at complete fracture, whereas the impact strength of reinforced dentures was 201.7+/-77.9 J and 277.9+/-102.5 J, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that impact strength of the high-impact acrylic complete denture was significantly increased by the addition of woven E-glass fiber (P<.0001). CONCLUSION: The impact strengths of maxillary complete dentures fabricated with high-impact acrylic resin increased by a factor greater than 2 when reinforced with woven E-glass fiber.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2004

Shear bond strength of microwaveable acrylic resin for denture repair.

Microwaveable acrylic denture resins are believed to provide an effective means of repairing fractured dentures. This in vitro investigation compared the bond strength of a microwaveable acrylic resin as a denture repair material to two established auto-polymerized resins. Fifty-one specimens were made using Lucitone 199 as a simulated denture base, and were then divided into three groups of 17 samples each. Each test group was bonded with the following acrylic resins: Acron Mc, Rapid Repair and Palapress. A shear bond strength test was carried out 24 h after the samples were bonded. Fracture analysis showed that bond failure was adhesive for all groups. Shear bond values showed a statistically significant difference at P < 0.05 level between Acron Mc and Rapid Repair; Palapress and Rapid Repair, and indicated that Acron Mc and Palapress were superior to Rapid Repair as a repair material. However, there was no statistical difference found between Acron Mc and Palapress. Microwaveable acrylic resins produce repaired junctions of adequate strength.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Wetting properties of saliva substitutes on acrylic resin.

The good wetting of the acrylic resin by saliva substitutes is of clinical importance in xerostomic patients. This study evaluated the wetting properties of different artificial saliva formulations that were mucin-based, carboxymethylcellulose-based, and concentrated ion-based on poly(methyl methacrylate) denture base resin, and compared these properties with natural saliva. The wetting properties of the test materials were examined by contact angle measurements. Ninety-six samples that measured 30 x 30 x 3 mm were examined. The wetting properties of mucin-containing and carboxymethylcellulose-containing substitutes on poly(methyl methacrylate) were significantly better than those of human saliva. Mucin-containing artificial salivas had the best wetting properties on the acrylic resin for the materials tested.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1985

Dimensional change of acrylic resin tray materials.

Twelve commonly used acrylic resin tray materials were compared for linear curing shrinkage. Three of the 12 were found to expand slightly during the first few hours, which had the effect of reducing the net shrinkage. All trays, however, exhibited shrinkage during the 24-hour test period. Therefore, autopolymerizing acrylic resin tray materials should not be used for an impression the same day that they are made unless the tray is boiled as suggested by Pagniano et al. This agrees with research already completed even though the magnitude of shrinkage was considerably less than that reported in previous studies.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2006

Impact strength and fracture morphology of denture acrylic resins.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Microwave-polymerization cycles may affect the impact strength and fracture morphology of denture base acrylic resin, and the microstructural effects of these processes have not been fully determined. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the impact strength and fracture morphology of denture base acrylic resins processed by microwave energy and hot water bath. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty specimens measuring 65 x 10 x 2.5 mm were fabricated from each of 4 acrylic resins processed according to the manufacturers' recommendations: Lucitone 550 (control; 9 hours at 74 degrees C); Onda Cryl (3 minutes at 360 W + 4 minutes pause + 3 minutes at 810 W); Acron MC (3 minutes at 500 W); and Vipi Wave (20 minutes at 180 W + 5 minutes at 540 W). The impact strength was evaluated in an impact testing machine using the Charpy method with a load (impact action) of 3.95 J. Mean values of impact strength were compared by Tukey honestly significant difference test (alpha = .05). Fractures were classified as brittle or intermediate. Fractographic analysis was performed for all fragments by angle analyses of crack propagation, and the microstructural morphology characterization was accomplished with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data from the fractography analysis were submitted to the Kruskal-Wallis test for angles and radius (alpha = .05). RESULTS: Significant differences (P < .001) were found in the impact strength for Vipi Wave and Acron MC acrylic resins, which demonstrated the lowest values (0.19 +/- 0.04 and 0.21 +/- 0.02, respectively). Most fractures were classified as brittle (Lucitone 55%; Onda Cryl 75%; Acron MC 90%; Vipi Wave 65%). Fractographic angle analysis of brittle fractures showed no differences among acrylic resins studied; however, angle values of intermediate fractures for Onda Cryl were lower in comparison with those from Lucitone 550 and Vipi Wave (P = .03). The SEM observations revealed that brittle fractures showed defined and organized crystallographic planes, whereas the intermediate fractures had a disorganized appearance. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, it was observed that impact strength in microwave-polymerized acrylic resins varies according to the period of irradiation. Acrylic resins exhibited a high number of brittle fractures, irrespective of the processing technique.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of original water content in acrylic resin on processing shrinkage.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the original water content of a supplied acrylic resin powder and a monomer and of dry heat-processed acrylic bars. The effect of the original water content of acrylic resin on processing shrinkage was also investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten bar specimens were fabricated using dried and as-supplied (control) acrylic resins. The resins were polymerized and cooled, then weighed and measured to determine the amount of shrinkage. The initial water content of the specimens was determined by thorough drying, and results were compared with the Student ttest. RESULTS: The initial water content and processing shrinkage of the dried acrylic resin bars were both significantly lower (P < .0001) than those of the as-supplied acrylic resin bars. CONCLUSION: The processing shrinkage of acrylic resin made from dried constituents was significantly less than that of resin made from products as supplied by the manufacturer. However, it is not known if this change is of clinical significance.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1998

In vivo color stability of resin composite veneers and acrylic resin teeth in removable partial dentures.

OBJECTIVE: The color stability of laboratory-made composite veneers was compared to that of artificial resin teeth under in vivo conditions. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Veneers and resin teeth of removable partial dentures were measured colorimetrically with reflection spectrophotometry; the color changes were characterized in the Commission Internationale d'Eclairage L*a*b* color space. The color was first determined 24 hours after manufacture and again after 6, 12, and 18 months at incisal, cervical, and centrofacial tooth positions. The denture teeth and veneers were measured, cleaned to eliminate the influence of surface discoloration, and measured again at every recall. The food consumption and tooth cleaning habits of the patients were taken into account. RESULTS: In all groups the maximum color changes from the baseline measurement were delta L* = 2.1, delta a* = 0.4, and delta b* = 1.8. The changes in the delta E* values were between 1.0 and 2.5 units. Despite polishing, the delta E* values increased by approximately 0.2 to 0.3 units in relation to the previous measurement with increased wearing time. External discolorations were eliminated by polishing, depending on the type of material; the maximum color change because of polishing was between 0.8 and 2.0 units for delta E*. The resin teeth showed no significant changes in the delta E* values. CONCLUSION: After a wearing period of 18 months, the discolorations of the tested materials were clinically acceptable. The artificial resin teeth showed statistically smaller color changes than did the veneering materials.

Color↗
PubMed1988

The effect of vacuum-mixed autopolymerizing acrylic resins on porosity and transverse strength.

Three brands of autopolymerizing acrylic resin were mixed and polymerized three different ways and tested for transverse strength and porosity. The procedures tested were bench-curing at ambient temperatures, vacuuming the mix before bench-curing, and curing in a pressure device. The data indicate that both vacuuming the mix and pressure-curing are successful in reducing porosity and increasing transverse strength. These improved properties would be valuable in the fabrication of provisional restorations and occlusal splints. The following conclusions can be drawn: 1. Use of a pressure device decreases porosity and increases the transverse strength in samples of autopolymerizing acrylic resin. 2. Use of a vacuum device on the mixed acrylic resin works as well as pressure polymerizing. 3. Use of either technique is indicated to improve the quality and longevity of autopolymerizing acrylic resin restorations, orthodontic appliances, and occlusal splints.

Chemical Phenomena↗