Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ACCESSORY NERVE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Clinical signs of accessory nerve palsy.

BACKGROUND: Injury to the spinal accessory nerve causes paralysis of the trapezius muscle, which is a painful and disabling condition. Many injuries are iatrogenic. Diagnosis is often made after a long delay, suggesting that current clinical signs are inadequate. METHODS: Accessory nerve palsy is known to be a cause of winging of the scapula. Observation of six patients with accessory nerve palsy has shown that winging of the scapula is most prominent when the patient actively externally rotates the shoulder against resistance. RESULTS: This is in contrast to the other causes of winging of the scapula including long thoracic nerve palsy and muscular dystrophy, where the scapula is most prominent on flexion or abduction of the shoulder. CONCLUSION: We propose that the resisted active external rotation test should be regarded as the key clinical sign for accessory nerve palsy.

Accessory Nerve Diseases↗
PubMed2003

Surgical outcomes of 111 spinal accessory nerve injuries.

OBJECTIVE: Iatrogenic injury to the spinal accessory nerve is not uncommon during neck surgery involving the posterior cervical triangle, because its superficial course here makes it susceptible. We review injury mechanisms, operative techniques, and surgical outcomes of 111 surgical repairs of the spinal accessory nerve. METHODS: This retrospective study examines clinical and surgical experience with spinal accessory nerve injuries at the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center during a period of 23 years (1978-2000). Surgery was performed on the basis of anatomic and electrophysiological findings at the time of operation. Patients were followed up for an average of 25.6 months. RESULTS: The most frequent injury mechanism was iatrogenic (103 patients, 93%), and 82 (80%) of these injuries involved lymph node biopsies. Eight injuries were caused by stretch (five patients) and laceration (three patients). The most common procedures were graft repairs in 58 patients. End-to-end repair was used in 26 patients and neurolysis in 19 patients if the nerve was found in continuity with intraoperative electrical evidence of regeneration. Five neurotizations, two burials into muscle, and one removal of ligature material were also performed. More than 95% of patients treated by neurolysis supported by positive nerve action potential recordings improved to Grade 4 or higher. Of 84 patients with lesions repaired by graft or suture, 65 patients (77%) recovered to Grade 3 or higher. The average graft length was 1.5 inches. CONCLUSION: Surgical exploration and repair of spinal accessory nerve injuries is difficult. With perseverance, however, these patients with complete or severe deficits achieved favorable functional outcomes through operative exploration and repair.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed2005

Variations in the surface anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior triangle.

Iatrogenic injury to the spinal accessory nerve has been widely documented and can have medico-legal implications. The resulting syndrome of pain, paralysis and winging of the scapula are often the source of considerable morbidity. This paper researches the degree of accuracy achievable in mapping the surface anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve in the region of the posterior triangle with a view to creating a cartographical aid to surgical procedures. The necks of 25 adult cadavers were dissected bilaterally to expose the spinal accessory nerve. Variations in the course and distribution of the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior triangle were recorded along with its relationship to the borders of sternocleidomastoid and trapezius. Considerable variation was seen in the surface and regional anatomy of the nerve and in the contribution of the cervical plexus to the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior triangle. Measurements of the running course and exit point of the nerve into and from the posterior triangle differed significantly from those previously recorded. Delineation of an accurate surface anatomy was not possible. Creating a map to define the surface anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior triangle is an unrealistic goal given its wide variations in man. Avoidance of damage to the spinal accessory nerve cannot be achieved by slavishly adhering to surface markings given in textbooks, but only by cautious dissection during operations on the posterior triangle.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed1996

The posterior triangle and the painful shoulder: spinal accessory nerve injury.

Forty-three cases of accessory nerve injury referred to the Peripheral Nerve Injury Unit have been reviewed. Accessory nerve injury results in a characteristic group of symptoms and signs. Referral for treatment is usually delayed, the average time being 11.3 months. Surgical treatment resulted in improvement of symptoms in almost all cases.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed1992

[Anatomicosurgical comments on the importance of the spinal accessory nerve].

The preserved integrity of the spinal accessory nerve plays an extremely important role in cervico-facial surgery since the majority of surgical approaches involve this nervous structure. Following a short historical outline of the surgical method, the Authors illustrate the anatomo-topographical aspects and anatomo-surgical problems. A number of points emerge from a review of the literature which are vital to isolate the spinal accessory nerve: 1) the transversal apophysis of the atlas is particularly prominent in the retrostyloid space and lies half-way across an imaginary horizontal segment connecting the mastoid process with the angle of the mandible; 2) the posterior edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle at approximately six centimetres from the mastoid process; 3) the nervous point of Erb located at the point where the superficial branches of the cervical plexus emerge from the posterior edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (the nerve generally emerges from the posterior edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle two centimetres above this point and two centimetres below it the nerve meets the anterior edge of the trapezius). This is followed by an analysis of the possible complications deriving from lesions to this vital nervous structure. The resection of the spinal accessory nerve leads to the so-called "shoulder syndrome" mainly due to the denervation of the trapezius. This syndrome is characterised by the onset of regional pain, the typical deformation of the shoulder joint and functional deficit. The deformation is provoked by the decreased muscular strength of the superior and middle portion of the trapezius manifested as the rocking of the shoulder and a higher superointernal angle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed2002

Vulnerability of the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior triangle of the neck: a cadaveric study.

Injury to the accessory nerve results in an obvious shoulder droop, loss of shoulder elevation, and pain. Prevention of inadvertent injury to the accessory nerve is critical in neck dissection. No previous study, however, anatomically demonstrates the mechanism of the spinal accessory nerve traction injury. Anatomic determination of the location and course of the spinal accessory nerve may be helpful for a better understanding of the mechanism of the nerve injury. The accessory nerve courses obliquely across the posterior triangle on the surface of the levator scapula muscle and reaches the trapezius. The length of the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior triangle is 34.7+/- 6.3 mm. The nerve passes through the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle 50.7+/- 12.9 mm below the tip of the mastoid process and reaches the anterior border of the trapezius 49.8 +/- 5.9 mm above the clavicle. It makes a posterior angle of 73.1 degrees +/- 19.4 degrees, on average, relative to the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid. When the shoulder is pulled down and the head is turned to the opposite direction, the spinal accessory nerve is stretched in the posterior triangle. In the posterior triangle, the nerve is vulnerable, since it is superficial and covered only by skin and subcutaneous fascia. Therefore, extreme caution should be taken with any surgical procedures in the posterior triangle. Traction injury of the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior triangle cannot be ignored.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed1999

Restoration of elbow flexion in brachial plexus avulsion injury: comparing spinal accessory nerve transfer with intercostal nerve transfer.

This study was performed to compare the clinical outcome of 2 types of commonly used nerve transfers, the spinal accessory nerve transfer and the intercostal nerve transfer. This study was a prospective randomized parallel trial involving 205 patients presenting between 1989 and 1994. All patients were males ranging in age from 16 to 43 years. All patients underwent surgery within 6 months of injury. Spinal accessory nerve transfer was performed in 130 patients; better results were obtained in terms of less operative time, fewer blood transfusions, fewer immediate complications, and better motor function (very good and good power in 83% of patients). Intercostal nerve transfer was performed in 75 patients; better results were observed in terms of earlier electromyographic evidence of motor reinnervation, improvement in protective sensation, and reduction of pain. However, very good and good motor recovery was observed in only 64% of patients. There was no significant difference with regard to tidal volume, vital capacity, and the FEV1 to FEV ratio before and after surgery in either group. Smoking adversely affected the rate of recovery. Spinal accessory nerve transfer should be used when motor function of the elbow flexors is the major concern. Intercostal nerve transfer should be performed in patients who need both motor and sensory reconstruction and in those who have chronic pain syndrome after brachial plexus injury.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Morphology and distribution of the motor neurons of the accessory nerve (nXI) in the Japanese toad: a cobaltic lysine study.

Motoneurons supplying the accessory nerve (nXI) of the Japanese toad were retrogradely labelled by applying the cobaltic lysine to the cut end of the nerve. They had morphological characteristics and a distribution pattern similar to those of the rostral spinal motoneurons rather than the branchial motoneurons. We propose that the anuran nXI is equivalent to the so-called spinal portion of the nXI of other vertebrates, and both should be regarded as part of the rostral spinal nerves rather than the nerve accessory to the vagus nerve.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Reconstruction of spinal accessory nerve after radical neck dissection.

Resection of the spinal accessory nerve in cases of radical neck dissection often causes considerable damage to the function of the shoulder girdle; it leads to limitation of the motion of the upper limb and pain in the shoulder girdle. It seems a sensible compromise to reconstruct the spinal accessory nerve in one-stage operation with radical neck dissection, which can often prevent extensive atrophy of the trapezius muscle, with a resultant improvement in the chance of successful rehabilitation. The technique of the operation is described: after completion of radical neck dissection, in one-stage operation an autogenous nerve transplant from the n. auricularis magnus is sewn onto the central and peripheral stumps of the spinal accessory nerve, which are protected by a "vein-muff" and the fascia of the muscle. After such spinal accessory nerve reconstruction, subjective complaints and objective symptoms were much milder in 6 patients than in the control group, which consisted of 10 patients who underwent a similar operation but without spinal accessory nerve reconstruction.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed2004

[Reconstruction of accessory nerve defects with sternocleidomastoid muscle-great auricular nerve flap].

OBJECTIVE: To describe a new method of accessory nerve defect reconstruction with sternocleidomastoid muscle-great auricular flap. METHODS: Thirty-four cases receiving traditional radical neck dissection were divided into two groups: single neck dissection group (n = 19) and accessory nerve reconstruction group (n = 15). Surgical procedure of the reconstruction was described in detail. Postoperative shoulder functions were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Accessory nerve reconstruction group experienced much better shoulder function recovery than that in single neck dissection group. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of accessory nerve defects with sternocleidomastoid muscle-great auricular nerve flap is simple, effective and complication-free.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed2002

Morphologic study of the connections between the accessory nerve and the posterior root of the first cervical nerve.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anastomotic relationships between the accessory nerve and the posterior root of the first cervical nerve and to determine the course of the posterior root nerve fibers after anastomosis. The relationships between these two nerves were studied in 100 sides of the spinal cord and then classified into four types. In the most common type of anastomosis (38% of cases), either a branch from the posterior C1 root was seen to course cranially and join the accessory nerve, or the posterior root and accessory nerve fused as they coursed orthogonal to one other. In the second most common type (36% of cases), the accessory nerve anastomosed with a posterior C1 root that had no direct connection with the spinal cord; the nerve fibers of the posterior root were observed in stained samples to course caudally along the accessory nerve and join the posterior C2 root. In the least common type (6% of cases), no connection was observed between the accessory nerve and the posterior C1 root. In the next least common type (20% of cases), the posterior C1 root was absent and a connecting branch was sometimes observed between the accessory nerve and the anterior C1 root.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed2003

Schwannoma of the spinal accessory nerve in the cisterna magna.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial schwannoma of the accessory nerve can be divided into two types. One is a jugular foramen type arising from the accessory nerve of the jugular foramen, while the other is an intracisternal type, which arises from the spinal root of the accessory nerve and is separate from the jugular foramen. The latter type is rare, and only 9 cases have been reported previously. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 46-year-old female presented with a large, midline mass lesion in the posterior fossa manifesting as foramen magnum syndrome. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a huge tumor with cystic lesion located in the cisterna magna with extension to the C1 spinal level. The tumor was totally removed by a suboccipital craniectomy and C1 laminectomy. It originated from the spinal root of the right accessory nerve. Temporary slight atrophy of the right sternocleidomastoid muscle was observed, but the patient was free of disease 2 years after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We report a schwannoma of the spinal accessory nerve in the cisterna magna. The clinical and neuroradiological findings are discussed with a review of the literature. The initial symptoms were variable without loss of function of the cranial nerve, and the tumor tended to grow in the cisterna magna without laterality. Because of the absence of typical neurologic symptoms, early neuroradiological investigation by MRI is recommended for accurate diagnosis of these tumors.

Accessory Nerve Diseases↗
PubMed2006

Restoration of shoulder abduction by transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve through dorsal approach: a clinical study.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve has become a routine procedure for restoration of shoulder abduction. However, the operation via the traditional supraclavicular anterior approach often leads to partial denervation of the trapezius muscle. The purpose of the study was to introduce transfer of the spinal accessory nerve through dorsal approach, using distal branch of the spinal accessory nerve, to repair the suprascapular nerve for restoration of shoulder abduction, and to observe its therapeutic effect. METHODS: From January to October 2003, a total of 11 patients with a brachial plexus injury and an intact or nearly intact spinal accessory nerve were treated by transferring the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve through dorsal approach. The patients were followed up for 18 to 26 months [mean (23.5 +/- 5.2) months] to evaluate their shoulder abduction and function of the trapezius muscle. The outcomes were compared with those of 26 patients treated with traditional anterior approach. And the data were analyzed by Student's t test using SPSS 10.5. RESULTS: In the 11 patients, the spinal accessory nerves were transferred to the suprascapular nerve through the dorsal approach successfully. Intact function of the upper trapezius was achieved in all of them. In the patients, the location of the two nerves was relatively stable at the level of superior margin of the scapula, the mean distance between them was (4.2 +/- 1.4) cm, both the nerves could be easily dissected and end-to-end anastomosed without any tension. During the follow-up, the first electrophysiological sign of recovery of the infraspinatus appeared at (6.8 +/- 2.7) months and the first sign of restoration of the shoulder abduction at (7.6 +/- 2.9) months after the operation, which were earlier than that after the traditional operation [(8.7 +/- 2.4) months and (9.9 +/- 2.8) months, respectively; P < 0.05]. The postoperative shoulder abduction was 62.8 degrees +/- 12.6 degrees after transfer of the spinal accessory nerve, better than that after the traditional (51.6 degrees +/- 15.7 degrees). All the 11 patients could extend and externally rotate the shoulder almost normally. CONCLUSIONS: The accessory nerve transfer through dorsal approach is a safe and reliable procedure for the treatment of brachial plexus injury. Its postoperative effect is confirmed, which is better than that of the traditional operation.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed1984

Accessory nerve stimulation in the assessment of myasthenia gravis.

Repetitive nerve stimulation (5/second) was done at the median nerve at the wrist and at the accessory nerve just behind the sternocleidomastoid muscle before and 20 seconds to 5 minutes after tetanic nerve stimulation (1 minute). Since the degree of the neuromuscular block depends on the body temperature these investigations were done successively at skin temperatures of 32 degrees C and 36 degrees C. A comparison of the results obtained revealed the highest rate of pathologic decrement with posttetanic accessory nerve stimulation (32 degrees C = 77%, 36 degrees C = 87%), whereas with posttetanic median nerve stimulation pathological results were obtained in a significantly lower proportion (32 degrees C = 50%, 36 degrees C = 60%). The advantages of the stimulation of the accessory nerve for the detection of partial neuromuscular block are: 1. The superficially located accessory nerve allows for supramaximal stimulation with rather low stimulus intensities (6-20 mA). 2. Since the accessory nerve is mainly a motor nerve, the stimulation is less painful than the stimulation of a mixed nerve. 3. Stimulation of a proximal nerve is more sensitive for detecting a defect in neuromuscular transmission than stimulation of a distal nerve. 4. There is no risk of a pneumothorax and of a traumatic nerve lesion as there is with stimulation of the brachial plexus by needle electrodes.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed2004

Treatment of a proximal accessory nerve injury with nerve transfer.

OBJECTIVE AND HYPOTHESIS: This study presents a case report of a patient who sustained an iatrogenic proximal accessory nerve injury that was treated with a medial pectoral to accessory nerve transfer. STUDY DESIGN: Case study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chart of one patient who was treated with a medial pectoral to accessory nerve transfer was reviewed. RESULTS: Five months after excision of a branchial cyst that resulted in a very proximal injury to the accessory nerve, this patient underwent a medial pectoral to accessory nerve transfer. At final follow-up, 3 years after surgery, the patient had full abduction overhead with some residual shoulder/scapular discomfort and mild scapular winging. CONCLUSION: The medial pectoral to accessory nerve transfer provides a viable surgical option with good reinnervation of the trapezius muscle in patients with a proximal accessory nerve injury where standard nerve repair or graft techniques are not feasible.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed1997

Delayed primary repair of a kyrogenic spinal accessory nerve injury: a case report.

The course of the accessory nerve through the posterior cervical triangle is superficial and in close juxtaposition to the posterior cervical lymph node chain. These anatomic features contribute to the common occurrence of kyrogenic injury to the accessory nerve. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of this injury often is delayed because the clinical presentation may mimic shoulder impingement or adhesive capsulitis. The authors present a case with a 15-year followup of a 48-year-old woman who underwent successful delayed primary repair of an accessory nerve injury after a lymph node biopsy. Electromyographic examination is recommended at 3 weeks after a suspected accessory nerve lesion, and if evidence of trapezial denervation is present, early surgical exploration is indicated because spontaneous recovery is rare.

Accessory Nerve Injuries↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Accessory nerve damages and impaired shoulder movements after neck dissections.

PURPOSE: After neck dissection, where the accessory nerve is often excised patients usually complain of impaired shoulder movements. The accessory nerve forms a plexus with branches of the cervical nerves C2, C3, and C4. In the present study, the accessory nerve was examined during neck dissections to clarify the incidence of motor fibers in joining branches, and the function of the motor fibers was evaluated postoperatively in relation to shoulder movements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Presence of cervical contributions to the accessory nerve were examined in 20 neck sides in 15 patients. Postoperative function of the shoulder movements was evaluated by manual muscle testing (MMT) and electromyography (EMG). RESULTS: Motor fibers in cervical contributions were noted on four sides (20%) by stimulation of joining branches. When the accessory nerve was excised, scapular elevation was rarely impaired even if there were no motor fibers in the cervical contributions. Excision of the accessory nerve caused poor scapular adduction and impaired scapular depression and adduction in most cases even if motor fibers in the cervical contributions existed. CONCLUSION: Postoperative impairment of scapular movements was not attributed to the presence or absence of motor fibers in joining branches. Results obtained with electromyography did not represent the practical function of the muscle.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed2005

Reconstruction of accessory nerve defects with sternocleidomastoid muscle-great auricular nerve flap.

We introduced a new method for reconstruction of accessory nerve defects by using the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM)-great auricular nerve flap. Thirty-four patients receiving traditional radical neck dissection were divided into two groups: the accessory nerve not-reconstructed group (Group A, N = 19) and the accessory nerve reconstructed group (Group B, n = 15). The surgical procedure of the reconstruction is described in detail. Postoperative shoulder functions were compared between the two groups. We found that Group B experienced much better shoulder function recovery than Group A. Both groups had good wound healing. It is concluded that reconstruction of accessory nerve defects with SCM-great auricular nerve flap is simple, effective and complication-free and worthwhile.

Accessory Nerve↗