Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Proctoscopy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29Linked to original sources
PubMed1983

Flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy--the Monroe Clinic experience. A prospective study of 5000 examinations.

Analysis of 5000 consecutive flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopies form the basis of this report. It is concluded that this method of examination of the distal large bowel is not only safe and comfortable for the patient but is a more appropriate examination than the rigid proctosigmoidoscopy because of the significant increase in pathologic material found. This examination has proven practical and acceptable in a multispecialty clinic setting and has completely replaced rigid proctosigmoidoscopy. Flexible sigmoidoscopy is now the standard "routine" examination of the rectum and distal colon. The rationale for this conclusion is presented in this timely report.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1985

Screening and prevention of colorectal cancer in Haining County.

From September 15, 1977, to April 15, 1978, 450, 477 persons over the age of 7 years were screened for schistosomiasis; a subgroup of 198,950 over 30 years were screened for colorectal cancer. Seventy-five malignant colorectal tumors were discovered in the latter group, a positive rate of 37.69 per 100,000 (seven were colonic cancers, 14 rectal cancers, 20 polyps with cancerous change, and 34 carcinoids). Of this group, 2701 had various types of polyps and 5242 had definitive diagnostic schistosomiasis. History, physical examination, and an occult blood test are simple, useful methods for detecting late colorectal cancer but are of no value in preventive screening of early cases. While digital rectal examination is an important, effective method of diagnosing rectal cancer, the positive rate is one tenth that of rectoscopy. It cannot be used for mass screening because the examining finger cannot tolerate such constant use and is too short to discover higher tumors. The sequence of colorectal cancerous change found in our center was from normal intestinal epithelium to tumorigenic polyps or colorectal ulcer, to polyps with anaplastic change, to polyps with local cancerous change, to adenocarcinoma. Cancer was seen more frequently in villous and adenomatous polyps; these are called precancerous stages of colorectal cancer. No relationship between schistosomiasis and colorectal cancer was found.

Adenoma↗