Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Insufflation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy and lymphadenectomy without peritoneal insufflation for sigmoid colon cancer patients.

PURPOSE: A new method for laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy and lymphadenectomy is presented. The purpose of this method is to avoid complications and restrictions associated with pneumoperitoneum. METHODS: Abdominal wall is lifted up with Kirschner wires, which are placed in the middle and left lower abdomen; then a minilaparotomy, which can be created because air-tightness is not necessary, is extended at the beginning of the operation to later remove the resected specimen. Two laparoscopic instruments are inserted through the right lower abdomen. Through the minilaparotomy, the surgeon can operate with conventional instruments. RESULTS: Operative time can be shortened, and surgical manipulations such as ligations and sutures are far easier than and cosmetic results are similar to those of laparoscopic surgery under pneumoperitoneum. CONCLUSION: We believe that this technique is a safe, time-saving, and cost-beneficial technique for sigmoid colectomy, and by changing the location of the minilaparotomy, this method can also be applied to other types of gastrointestinal surgery.

Abdominal Muscles↗
PubMed2004

Effects of pneumoperitoneum created through CO2 insufflation and parameters of mechanical ventilation (PEEP application) on systemic dissemination of intraabdominal infections.

BACKGROUND: To examine whether CO2 pneumoperitoneum and positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanical ventilation affect the systemic spread of intraabdominal infection. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley male rats weighing 200-300 g were allocated to three groups of 12 animals in each. All rats received mechanical ventilation under general anesthesia. An intraabdominal infection model was established by injecting with 1 ml of Escherichia coli (10(9) CFU/mL) intraperitoneally. Half of the animals in each group were exposed to PEEP (10 cmH2O). CO2 pneumoperitoneum at 13 mmHg was applied to the rats in group 1. Group 2 rats underwent laparotomy. Group 3 served as controls. In addition, TNF-alpha serum levels were measured at baseline and 3 h. A peritoneal specimen for histopathological examination were obtained after the rats were killed at the end of 3 h. For the assessment of data, descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation) as well as Friedman test for repeated measurements in multiple groups, Kruskal-Wallis test for intergroup comparisons, Dunn's multiple comparison test for subgroup comparisons, Mann-Whitney U test for comparisons between paired groups, chi-square and Fisher's exact test for comparison of qualitative data, and McNemar's test for assessment of changes in group variables over time were used. The results were considered statistically significant if probability (p) values were <0.05. RESULTS: Grades of peritonitis in group 1 and 2 were seen to differ nonsignificantly. In group 1, baseline blood cultures were not included in the assessment between the subgroups that received PEEP or not, as there was no growth in any of the subgroups. No significant difference was detected between growth in blood cultures at 1, 2, and 3 h ( p > 0.05). Application of PEEP in subgroups did not alter the blood culture results ( p > 0.05). Significant differences were seen between the initial and final TNF-alpha values of groups (KW: 18.94, p < 0.0001). The values in control group were observed to be significantly lower than those in groups 1 and 2 ( p < 0.01, p < 0.001). Bacteremia and systemic spread of the intraabdominal infection did appear to be different according to the PEEP application. After the assessments of ventilation parameters in our study, significant reductions in pH and HCO3 levels were detected in group 1 as a result of pneumoperitoneum, which was consistent with the literature. There is a significant difference between pH values at baseline and at the end of 1 h because of pneumoperitoneum (Fr: 10.01, p < 0.05). PEEP application in subgroups did not create significant differences in terms of respiratory parameters ( p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: No difference was found between the applications of CO2 pneumoperitoneum and laparotomy with regard to bacteremia and infection-induced peritonitis. It was determined that pneumoperitoneum along with PEEP application had neither a positive nor a negative impact on intraabdominal infection.

Animals↗