Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “General Practitioners”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Adolescent health care: perspectives of Victorian general practitioners.

OBJECTIVES: To assess general practitioners' (GPs') views of adolescents as a discrete patient group with specific developmental health care needs; to document GPs' perceived knowledge of and competence in adolescent health care; and to clarify the barriers GPs perceive to effective delivery of such care. DESIGN: Qualitative research. METHODS: Stratified sampling generated a sample of 57 GPs from rural and urban divisions of general practice. Focus group discussions and individual interviews were recorded and transcripts were analysed. RESULTS: Thirty-three GPs (62%) reported that adolescents made up 10% or more of their weekly consultations. Although 10 GPs defined adolescents by developmental criteria, 47 had an incomplete understanding of the developmental aspects of adolescence. Most GPs (43) had some concerns about their knowledge of and competence in delivering adolescent health care and 52 stated that they had had little or no formal training in adolescent health. The participants perceived a range of barriers to effective health care provision, including issues of confidentiality, communication and cost. CONCLUSIONS: Changes are needed in the Medicare card and rebate systems to ensure improved access to affordable, confidential care for adolescents. Our results also support the incorporation of important adolescent health care issues in undergraduate and postgraduate medical training.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Meeting the educational needs of general practitioners for epilepsy.

Epilepsy care in general practice has been criticized, but what do GPs feel they deal with most and complete satisfactorily? If criticism is justified, education should be useful in improving epilepsy care, but what do general practitioners want to learn and how do they want to learn it? Questionnaires about these issues were sent to randomly chosen general practitioners throughout the United Kingdom. One hundred and twenty-four out of 200 (62%) responded. They were not biased by age, sex, type of practice or previous interest in epilepsy. Drug treatment and regular review were the two areas of care GPs said they dealt with most, but only half felt they dealt with them well. Sixty-six percent wanted to learn more about drug treatment, 46% about lifestyle advice, 45% about non-drug treatment, 44% about diagnosis and only 16% did not want to learn more about any aspect of care. Weekdays and evenings were the preferred times for study. Courses up to one full day away from practices were popular, distance learning and personal education plans were not, except for a group of younger GPs. When attending courses multi-disciplinary lectures rated highly and nearly three-quarters preferred to attend courses where epilepsy was covered in conjunction with other conditions. Future epilepsy education for GPs should recognize these findings if attendance and positive outcomes are to be maximized.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

[General practitioners in hospital].

Different models of hospital-primary care collaboration are tried out throughout Norway. It is necessary to look into whether these programmes lead to behavioral changes and, in turn, whether this benefits the patients. In 1995, a general practitioner in Arendal, Norway, initiated a local hospital visiting programme for all general practitioners in the county. The general practitioners were invited to visit one of the departments of the local hospital two weeks every year over a five-year period and thus to get to know all the departments. The aim was to give general practitioners more knowledge of the hospital departments and their doctors, while at the same time giving hospital doctors the opportunity to meet the general practitioners in their catchment area, thus enhancing the collaboration between hospital and primary care through personal contact. One beneficial effect might be quicker access to specialist consultations, as more controls after hospital treatment could be transferred to primary care. This evaluation is based on a survey among hospital departments (12 out of 16 responding) and general practitioners (60 out of 95 responding) who were invited to participate. All respondents wanted the programme to continue. Both hospital doctors and general practitioners were very satisfied with the programme and believed that it would lead to better collaboration between these two levels of our health care system.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2005

[Assessment of a general practitioner training campaign for early detection of cutaneous melanoma in the Haut-Rhin department of France].

INTRODUCTION: Dermatologists frequently provide training for general practitioners, but such training is not systematic and evaluation is rare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A training campaign for general practitioners and occupational physicians in melanoma screening was carried out in the Haut-Rhin Department of France in 2004. The 630 general practitioners and 120 occupational physicians in this geographic department received repeated mail together with materials (posters and booklets) for their waiting rooms, and they were invited to attend medical training sessions. The sessions consisted of 10 photographs for initial evaluation, provision of epidemiological information, training in identification of subjects at risk and diagnosis of pigmented lesions, with a further 10 photographs for evaluation at the end. The 20 evaluation photographs were randomly selected for each session from 40 photographs comprising 18 cases of melanomas, 14 of nevi, 4 of basal cell carcinomas and 4 of seborrheic keratoses. At the end of each session, the physicians returned 2 anonymous questionnaires containing their overall assessment of the campaign (Q1) and their answers concerning the 20 evaluation photographs (proposed diagnosis and management strategy) (Q2). The questionnaires were then analyzed. The 40 evaluation photographs were also tested on 47 dermatologists. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty physicians - 278/630 general practitioners (44%) and 72/120 occupational physicians (60%) - attended 18 medical training sessions. Response levels for questionnaires Q1 and Q2 were 88% and 90% respectively. Almost all of the physicians involved considered the campaign to be warranted. At the end of the training sessions, 96% felt they were better equipped to identify subjects at risk for melanoma and 53% (58% of general practitioners and 39% of occupational physicians, p=0.03) felt they had greatly improved their ability to diagnose pigmented lesions. The median number of correct replies concerning the evaluation photographs increased from 6/10 to 7/10 between the initial evaluation photographs and the final evaluation photographs (p<0.0001), with no difference being seen between the general practitioners and occupational physicians. The median number of correct replies from the 47 dermatologists was 35/40 (8.75/10). The most striking improvement noted during the campaign concerned the ability to identify melanomas. The figure rose from an initial 59% at the start of the session (initial evaluation photographs) (versus 86% for the dermatologists) to 84% by the end of the session (final evaluation photographs) (p<0.0001). The management strategy proposed for photographs of melanoma (irrespective of the proposed diagnosis) was judged "appropriate" in 86% of cases at the start of the session versus 94% at the end of the session (p<0.001). Seborrheic keratosis was correctly identified in 43% of cases by the general practitioners/occupational physicians versus 75% by the dermatologists, and was confused with melanoma in 22% of cases by the general practitioners/occupational physicians versus 5% by the dermatologists. No improvement was seen during the training session in terms of the ability of the general practitioners/occupational physicians to correctly identify seborrheic keratosis. The majority of participants indicated their willingness to participate in the screening program and asked to receive information on melanoma on a regular basis. DISCUSSION: This initial study shows the immediate impact of medical training sessions on general practitioners/occupational physicians to be important in terms of sensitization and moderate but significant in terms of improved diagnosis of pigmented lesions. The longer term impact, as well as the impact of the campaign on physicians not taking part in the medical training sessions, remains unknown. This study militates in favor of the involvement of general practitioners and occupational physicians in mass screening for melanoma in collaboration with dermatologists. The 2004 campaign in the Haut-Rhin Department also included information for the general public. The primary evaluation criterion of the campaign will be change in incidence of thick melanomas recorded by the departmental cancer registry.

Education, Medical, Continuing↗
PubMed1993

Continuing education for general practice. 1. Experience, competence and the media of self-directed learning for established general practitioners.

The arrangements under which continuing education for general practice is provided and attendance by general practitioners is rewarded have now been in operation for three years. More recently, reaccreditation has emerged as a significant issue for the profession. For these reasons it appears timely to review the whole basis of ongoing learning by established general practitioners. In this the first of two papers, learning by established professionals is considered in relation to the educational development of the learner, the role of experience and the goals of competence and performance. It is concluded that self-directed learning based on experience should form the centre-piece of continuing education for general practice and that educational provision should adopt a complementary role in sustaining motivation to learn and by enabling learning from experience to be shared and enriched. A model of self-directed learning, connecting experience and competence through systematic application of three learning media, reading, reflection and audit, is proposed and related to appropriate educational participation by established general practitioners.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2006

Complementary and conventional medicine in Switzerland: comparing characteristics of general practitioners.

OBJECTIVES: Do structural characteristics of general practitioners (GPs) who practice complementary medicine (CAM) differ from those GPs who do not? Assessed characteristics included experience and professional integration of general practitioners (GPs), workload, medical activities, and personal and technical resources of practices. The investigated CAM disciplines were anthroposophic medicine, homoeopathy, traditional Chinese medicine, neural therapy and herbal medicine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We designed a cross-sectional study with convenience and stratified samples of GPs providing conventional (COM) and/or complementary primary care in Switzerland. The samples were taken from the database of the Swiss medical association (FMH) and from CAM societies. Data were collected using a postal questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the 650 practitioners who were included in the study, 191 were COM, 167 noncertified CAM and 292 certified CAM physicians. The proportion of females was higher in the population of CAM physicians. Gender-adjusted age did not differ between CAM and COM physicians. Nearly twice as many CAM physicians work part-time. Differences were also seen for the majority of structural characteristics such as qualification of physicians, type of practice, type of staff, and presence of technical equipment. CONCLUSION: The study results show that structural characteristics of primary health care do differ between CAM and COM practitioners. We assumed that the activities of GPs are defined essentially by analyzed structures. The results are to be considered for evaluations in primary health care, particularly when quality of health care is assessed.

Complementary Therapies↗
PubMed1991

Role of the general practitioner in breast cancer screening in The Netherlands.

Following the advice of the Dutch National Health Council, a national screening program for breast cancer was started in 1990 in the Netherlands. All women aged 50-70 will be invited for screening by mammography in fixed or (semi)mobile screening units every 2 years. The role of the general practitioner in screening for breast cancer is described in the Dutch protocol (Standard) published in 1990 by the Dutch College of General Practitioners. Because of the role of the general practitioner/family doctor as a gatekeeper and because of the list system, every Dutch woman is known by her own general practitioner. In any given year the general practitioner will see 70% of his population. So the general practitioner is in the position to play an important role in practice and patient-centered support of breast cancer screening. The general practitioner also has an important role in the support of women with positive results. The general practitioner receives the "abnormal" results and has to explain to the woman what this means and what further investigations are necessary. There are teaching programs on screening for breast cancer for the vocational training of general practitioners and for postgraduate training.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Survey of Australian emergency physicians' expectations of general practitioner referrals.

This paper reports the first study of Australian emergency physicians which concentrates on their relationship with general practitioners. A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to every known fellow and senior trainee of the Australasian College of Emergency Medicine working in Victoria, Australia. Good response rates were achieved (97% from fellows, 78% from trainees). Referral letters from general practitioners were always read by 99% of respondents. Telephone calls from general practitioners were found to be desirable for imparting details of social history or other qualitative information and for determining the appropriateness of the referral. The list of patients' current medication and the details of any emergency treatment administered by the general practitioner were almost universally considered essential inclusions in all urgent referral letters. Other items of information were considered to be influenced by the particular patient presentation. The majority of respondents (87%) felt that a written management plan had some influence on the patient's management in their emergency department. Eighty nine per cent of respondents stated that they always or usually responded to general practitioners' communications. The outcome for patients attending emergency departments with referral letters warrants study. If a good referral letter is seen to be of value in terms of more accurate diagnosis, quicker patient processing, less investigations and better responses, then general practitioners will be encouraged to write better letters. The results of this study offer a useful definition of inappropriate referral to the emergency department and it may now be possible to investigate any link between poor referral letters and inappropriate referrals.

Australia↗
PubMed1980

The work content of general practice. Based on a survey of selected procedures performed by Victorian general practitioners in 1978.

Much has been spoken about the changing nature of general practice, although little documental evidence is available to identify the nature of these changes. Such changes are said to include provision of some diagnostic services, diminishing involvement in surgical and obstetrical procedures, and a lessening of GP involvement in the hospital care of patients. Information about the range of services provided by the average general practitioner is essential knowledge required by planners of undergraduate, vocational and continuing education programmes. In view of the anticipated rapid increase in general practitioner numbers in the near future, further changes in the nature of the discipline are predicted. A survey of general practitioners was therefore proposed by four bodies concerned with medical education relevant to general practice, viz. -- the Victorian Medical Postgraduate Foundation, the Monash University Department of Social and Preventive Medicine (Section of Community Practice), the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (Victoria Faculty) and the Victorian Academy for General Practice Limited.

Anesthesiology↗
PubMed2003

General practitioner and hospital specialist attitudes to functional gastrointestinal disorders.

BACKGROUND: Functional gastrointestinal symptoms generate a large workload in primary care. Research on functional gastrointestinal disorders is focused on hospital patients, but these patients may differ from those managed in primary care. AIM: To investigate any differences in attitudes of general practitioners and hospital specialists towards functional gastrointestinal illnesses. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 200 general practitioners and 200 British Society of Gastroenterology members. RESULTS: The response rate was 76%. Sixty-two general practitioners believed that functional gastrointestinal symptoms represented a 'real' currently unexplained gastrointestinal disorder, and 67 believed such symptoms probably represented somatization of a psychological illness. In contrast, most consultants (120) believed that functional gastrointestinal symptoms represented a 'real' gastrointestinal disorder, with only 36 perceiving them to have a psychological basis (chi2 = 26.7, P < 0.001). More consultants than general practitioners believed that the understanding of functional gastrointestinal disorders had improved in the last 20 years (chi2 = 4.31, P < 0.05). Most consultants and most general practitioners thought that treatment for these disorders had not improved over this period. Only 21% of general practitioners had heard of the Manning criteria for the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome, compared to 81% of consultants (chi2 = 107, P < 0.0001); 12% of general practitioners and 83% of consultants had heard of the Rome criteria for the diagnosis of functional gastrointestinal disorders (chi2 = 154, P < 0.0001); 37% of consultants used the Manning criteria and 40% used the Rome criteria; 11% of general practitioners used the Manning criteria and 3% used the Rome criteria. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners and consultants have differing views on functional gastrointestinal disorders. In both primary and secondary care, most doctors do not use diagnostic criteria. Further research on the factors used to diagnose functional gastrointestinal disorders in primary care is warranted.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1995

General practitioners' requirements from a hospital cardiology department.

The requirements of 500 general practitioners from a hospital department of cardiology were sought and assessed from a questionnaire. One hundred and twenty two general practitioners caring for 766,384 patients responded. The most important inpatient service requirement was that cardiologists should be responsible for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction and other acute cardiac conditions. The expertise and reputation of the consultant cardiologist and the waiting time for an appointment were the two most important outpatient service requirements. The least important aspect was the time patients waited in clinic to see a doctor. Fundholders considered price of outpatient consultations to be unimportant. Waiting times for cardiac catheterisation and non-invasive cardiac investigations together with the quality of the investigation equipment and the technical staff were all considered to be important requirements. Most general practitioners wanted protocols for managing common cardiac conditions. The majority wanted an open access investigation service to reduce outpatient waiting times. Those who did not want an open access service explained that they would not be confident in interpreting the results or deciding subsequent management. An understanding of the requirements of general practitioners is helpful in planning and developing hospital services.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed1990

Individual variation between general practitioners in labelling of hypertension.

Variation in labelling of hypertension by individual general practitioners was studied during a continuous opportunistic screening programme for hypertension in a single general practice with 12 principals. All the general practitioners agreed to label as hypertensive patients with systolic pressures of greater than or equal to 200 mm Hg or diastolic pressures of greater than or equal to 110 mm Hg on three consecutive readings. The overall number of patients labelled hypertensive at the beginning of the screening programme was 505 and this rose to 801 after five years. There was a large variation in the numbers of patients recorded as hypertensive at the start of the screening period, with numbers ranging from eight to 112 for individual practitioners. The variation persisted during the screening period, with the numbers of patients detected by individual general practitioners ranging from four to 46. The average systolic and diastolic pressures recorded among these patients also varied between doctors, and only 24 out of 187 patients had their high pressures recorded on three occasions and so fully met the criteria for diagnosing hypertension. Clearly, general practitioners are following their own individual criteria in defining hypertension and taking into account factors other than just the measured blood pressure.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Lessons for the laboratory from a general practitioner survey.

AIMS: To assess the current performance of the clinical biochemistry service provided to general practitioners, with particular attention to result turnround times, and to identify and improvements required. METHODS: Postal questionnaire survey of general practitioners in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets who used the clinical biochemistry laboratory of the Royal London Hospital. A flow analysis study of turnround times for general practitioner samples was also performed. RESULTS: Responses to the questionnaire showed that although 82% of general practitioners thought the current quality of service provided was better than fair, the actual turnround times achieved were longer than the acceptable times required. There was also a strong demand (> 66% of responders) for additional information-such as highlighting of abnormal results-to be provided with results. There was wide variability between practitioners in their use of the laboratory (from none to > 800 requests per year), with no apparent correlation to practice size. Of the repertoire of tests requested, a surprisingly high percentage (14.3%) were for thyroid function. Flow analysis of turnround times for thyroid function tests showed that problems lay not with the time taken for analysis (only 7.8% of the total turnround time) but with the pre- and postanalytical phases, that is, the sample collection and results delivery service. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the proportion of health care delivered in the primary care sector will inevitably increase the requirement for pathology services. Improvements in the specimen collection and results delivery service to general practitioners are needed to meet their expectations. It remains to be determined whether increased investment in these aspects of laboratory service would result in improved patient care in the primary sector.

Biochemical Phenomena↗
PubMed1995

Use of general practitioner beds in Leicestershire community hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The shift in care from secondary to primary services is likely to place greater demands on community hospitals. Before changes in the provision of community hospitals can occur, baseline data are needed, outlining their current use. AIM: A study was undertaken to obtain baseline data describing the use of general practitioner beds in Leicestershire community hospitals. METHOD: A three-month prospective, observational study was carried out between February and May 1992 using data from a questionnaire completed by nurses and general practitioners and from patient hospital records. Study patients comprised all patients admitted to general practitioner beds in all eight Leicestershire community hospitals. RESULTS: A 100% questionnaire response rate was obtained giving data on 685 hospital admissions. Around 70% of admissions were of patients aged 75 years and over. Of admissions, 35% were for acute care, 31% for respite care, 22% for rehabilitation, 7% for terminal/palliative care and 5% for other reasons. Fifteen per cent of patients had been transferred from a consultant bed. Of those not transferred, 91% were admitted by their usual general practitioner or practice partner and for 96% of these patients this was the general practitioner's first choice for care. There was significant variation in both the age mix and care category mix of patients between individual hospitals. Medical deterioration in an underlying condition and family pressure on the general practitioner or carers' inability to cope each contributed to around half of all admissions. Of all admissions, 38% lived alone, and 18% of carers were disabled. Incontinence was reported for 35% of patients, and 26% of all patients were of a high nursing dependency. There was low utilization of community services before admission and 33% received none. There was variation between individual hospitals in use of local and district general hospital investigations, specialist referral and types of therapy. Of 685 admissions 11% died during their stay. Of those discharged, 76% went to their own or a relative's home, 10% to a residential or nursing home and 9% were transferred to an acute bed. Nine percent of discharges were postponed and 10% were brought forward. On discharge to non-residential care, 26% of patients received no community services. CONCLUSION: Shifting resources from secondary to primary care is a priority for purchasers. Both the introduction of the National Health Service and community care act 1990, and acute units having increasing incentives for earlier discharge, are likely to place greater demands on community hospital beds. Not all general practitioners have the option of community hospital beds. Before access to general practitioner beds can be broadened, existing beds should be used appropriately and shown to be cost-effective. Purchasers therefore require criteria for the appropriateness of admissions to general practitioner beds, and the results of a general practitioner bed cost-benefit analysis.

Bed Conversion↗
PubMed2003

Influenza and pneumococcal immunization in the elderly: knowledge, attitudes, and practices among general practitioners in Italy.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate general practitioners' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours related to influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in the elderly. A random sample of 500 general practitioners in Calabria, Italy, received a questionnaire focusing on demographics and practice characteristics, their knowledge of the main groups to whom influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were recommended, and attitudes and behaviours relating to disease prevention by influenza and pneumococcal immunization programs. Only 17.1% of the 148 respondents indicated every main group for whom influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were recommended, whereas 84.5 and 65.5% were aware that influenza and pneumococcal vaccine respectively should be administered to the elderly. Knowledge that the elderly were the likely beneficiaries of both vaccinations was significantly greater in older general practitioners and those with fewer years of professional activity. A positive attitude was reported by a large majority, who believed that these vaccines might reduce the seriousness of influenza (91.2%) and pneumococcal disease (87.9%), as well as the risk of hospitalization (95.2 and 89.2%, respectively). This attitude was significantly more common in those with fewer years of professional activity, those who worked more hours per week, and those who relied on scientific journals as a source of information. Almost all administered or recommended influenza vaccine (95.2%), whereas the use of pneumococcal vaccine was less widespread (46.9%); recommending or administering both vaccines to the elderly was significantly more prevalent in those who knew that this group were the likely beneficiaries of these vaccines. Our study thus showed that there is a great need for efforts to improve general practitioners' knowledge of influenza and pneumococcal vaccines and their adherence to vaccination policies.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Perspectives on lifestyle intervention: the views of general practitioners who have taken part in a health promotion study.

AIM: A study was carried out to discover the views of Danish general practitioners on the possibility of intervening in their patients' lifestyles in general and on the obstacles to doing so, based on their experience of participating in a health promotion study. METHOD: A focus group interview was conducted with five general practitioners who had participated in "The Ebeltoft Health Promotion Study" to assess their views on their preventive role. RESULTS: The general practitioners have internalized the view advanced by society and the medical profession that they have an important role to play in preventing lifestyle-related illness. However, they are sceptical about the effectiveness of intervention and have ethical concerns about giving lifestyle advice. They are also somewhat irritated by the fact that patients are chiefly interested in having their health checked, rather than in following up by changing their behaviour. The general practitioners differ in their views as to when, and how actively, they should initiate discussions with individual patients to encourage them to change their lifestyles. CONCLUSIONS: If the medical profession and those responsible for overall health policy wish to make general practitioners change their behaviour towards their patients, it is important that they understand the aims, values, and working conditions of general practitioners that underlie their present attitudes and behaviour.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

The quality initiative of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

The Quality Initiative of the Royal College of General Practitioners was set up in 1983 to promote the methods of quality assurance to general practitioners, and to answer some of the concerns of Government about the quality of general practice. Many small projects have been carried out, and this paper describes several undertaken by one faculty of the College, including studies of paediatric surveillance, the care of the elderly, and peer review visits to some members practices. General practitioners are now more positive about quality assurance, but the political debate about the future of primary care in the United Kingdom continues.

Family Practice↗
PubMed1996

Chronic disease or physical disability? The role of the general practitioner.

There has been a lack of discussion and consensus as to what the role of the general practitioner should be in the care of patients with chronic diseases. Should general practitioners concentrate on the disease or should their remit include the resultant disability and handicap? General practitioners have tended to concentrate on the disease, but this may be inappropriate. For many disabled people, their general practitioner is their only source of health care and is the gatekeeper to other services. Greater knowledge among doctors of the functional and social aspects of disease would therefore improve the quality of care for patients, and should be assessed through clinical audit. Ways are described in which general practitioners, working together with their patients with chronic diseases and with other health professionals, can improve aspects of the care of these patients.

Chronic Disease↗