Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Filgrastim”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Phase I trial of multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan with peripheral-blood stem-cell support as front-line therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and feasibility of delivering multiple cycles of front-line high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan with peripheral-blood stem-cell (PBSC) support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have a malignant solid tumor for which they had received no prior chemotherapy. Mobilization of PBSC was achieved with either filgrastim alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel. Patients then received three or four cycles of high-dose carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] 16), paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)), and topotecan (10-15 mg/m(2)), with the latter two agents administered as 24-hour infusions and supported with PBSC and filgrastim. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled onto the trial and were assessable for toxicity and clinical outcome. Dose-limiting toxicities were stomatitis and prolonged hematopoietic recovery. The maximum-tolerated dose of topotecan was 12.5 mg/m(2) when given with high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel for three cycles. Four cycles were able to be given with a dose of topotecan of 10 mg/m(2). The pharmacokinetics of each compound were not affected by the other agents. Eleven (85%) of 13 patients with assessable disease responded. CONCLUSION: Multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan can be safely administered with filgrastim and PBSC support. The recommended doses for phase II study are carboplatin AUC 16, paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2), and topotecan 10 mg/m(2). Trials are currently being conducted with this regimen as front-line treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and extensive small-cell carcinoma. This approach remains experimental and should be used only in the context of a clinical trial.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Randomized, controlled, dose-range study of Ro 25-8315 given before and after a high-dose combination chemotherapy regimen in patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of three different dose levels of pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Ro 25-8315) on progenitor cell mobilization and hematologic recovery in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients (n = 36) were randomly assigned to receive before (part I) and after (part II) chemotherapy either a single-dose injection of Ro 25-8315 (20 microg/kg, n = 9; 60 microg/kg, n = 9; 100 microg/kg, n = 10) or a standard daily dose of filgrastim (part I, 10 microg/kg/d; part II, 5 microg/kg/d) (control group, n = 8). RESULTS: Overall, Ro 25-8315 was well tolerated. In part I, more progenitor cell mobilization was observed with Ro 25-8315 100 microg/kg. The peak of circulating CD34(+) cells was obtained at day +5 in the four groups, and the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) returned to less than 20 x 10(9)/L by day +15. In part II, high levels of circulating CD34(+) cells (> 20 cells/microL) were obtained in all four groups. The chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (< 1 x 10(9)/L) was similar in the four groups. Ro 25-8315 100 microg/kg was more effective than filgrastim in reducing the number of patients with an ANC less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L on day +12 after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: A single injection of Ro 25-8315 100 microg/kg might be the optimal dose for steady-state peripheral-blood progenitor cell mobilization. A single injection of 20, 60, or 100 microg/kg could be as efficient as daily administration of filgrastim to correct chemotherapy-induced cytopenia. The optimal dose of Ro 25-8315 should be determined according to the planned chemotherapy regimen.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Granulocyte colony--stimulating factor for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with small cell lung cancer : the 40% rule revisited.

Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) [filgrastim and lenograstim] and pegylated G-CSF (pegfilgrastim) have been shown to reduce the severity and duration of chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia (FN) when administered prophylactically to cancer patients receiving chemotherapeutic regimens. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) evidence-based clinical guidelines published in 1994, 1996 and 1997 recommended primary prophylaxis with G-CSF for cancer patients. The 2000 ASCO update, with the same recommendation, highlights the importance of economic considerations in decision making for CSFs. This paper reviews the available cost-effectiveness evidence on the use of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis against FN in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).Cost-effectiveness ratios from a healthcare payer perspective supported the use of filgrastim as primary prophylaxis for people with SCLC, on the basis of both clinical and economic benefits, treated with chemotherapeutic regimens that have an FN rate in the range of 40-60%. However, when indirect and patient out-of-pocket costs attributable to severe FN are included, available evidence suggests that the risk threshold may be reduced by more than half. Given that FN rates associated with chemotherapeutic regimens for SCLC are generally <40%, then few circumstances would warrant the use of G-CSFs (filgrastim and lenograstim) under the current rule. However, inclusion of indirect costs would lower the cost-effectiveness threshold. Future cost-effectiveness studies of medications such as pegfilgrastim should attempt to capture the societal perspective by incorporating productivity-related costs and using base-case rates of FN reported in the literature.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2000

Trials of vinorelbine and docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non small-cell lung cancer.

Docetaxel was chosen for study in the combination chemotherapy of advanced non small-cell lung cancer on the basis of its reproducible high single-agent activity, novel mechanism of action, and relative lack of neurotoxicity. Preclinical and clinical data suggested schedule-dependent synergism with vinorelbine. Trials of docetaxel and vinorelbine have explored a variety of schedules. One approach has been to give docetaxel on day 1 of a 3-week cycle with vinorelbine on day 0 or days 1 and 5. Febrile neutropenia and non-neutropenic infections have been dose limiting, and low-dose intensity (8-13 mg/m2/week) of vinorelbine has been achieved. Our phase I study showed that docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 45 mg/m2 every 2 weeks could be safely given with prophylactic filgrastim. In the ensuing phase II trial, we observed a 51% confirmed response rate in 35 patients (95% confidence interval [CI]: 34-68). With a median follow-up of 12 months, the predicted median and 1-year survivals are 14 months and 60%, respectively. Use of prophylactic filgrastim and the every-2-week schedule of administration allowed for single-agent dose intensity of both drugs to be given. Febrile neutropenia occurred in five patients and 5/384 cycles. Cumulative toxicities of excessive lacrimation, fatigue, and onycholysis were observed. More recently, a weekly schedule of administration for both drugs has been studied. Docetaxel and vinorelbine appear highly active together when given on an every-2-week schedule with prophylactic filgrastim, and the combination may offer one alter-native to cisplatin-based therapy. However, confirmatory phase II and III studies are needed. Certain cumulative toxicities (onycholysis, lacrimation) may limit the duration of therapy. Application of this regimen for a shorter period, such as in induction or postoperative settings, may provide optimal benefit while minimizing toxicity.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2002

Stem cell transplantation and hematopoietic growth factors.

Hematopoietic growth factors are commonly used in allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation. The growth factors most frequently used are human recombinant erythropoietin, filgrastim, and sargramostim, and a number of trials have been done using them either singly or in various combinations for mobilization, post-transplant, and for delayed engraftment. Filgrastim and sargramostim can shorten the neutropenic period and decrease infectious complications post-transplant, thus lowering the cost of both autologous and allogeneic transplants. Erythropoietin has not been particularly effective for mobilization, and studies have not shown its efficacy in reducing red blood cell transfusions in autologous transplants. However, they have been clinically beneficial in allogeneic transplantation and in delayed erythropoiesis post-transplantation. Stem cell factor remains investigational at this time but seems promising. The new long-acting erythropoietin and filgrastim are also introduced here and briefly discussed.

Bone Marrow Transplantation↗
PubMed1995

Allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation for refractory leukemia and lymphoma: potential advantage of blood over marrow allografts.

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) have been used rarely for allogeneic transplantation because of concerns regarding graft failure and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We evaluated the results of allogeneic PBSC transplantation (allo-PBSCT) in 9 patients with refractory leukemia or lymphoma receiving myeloablative therapy followed by allo-PBSCT from an HLA-identical sibling donor. Three patients had relapsed 11 to 21 months after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (allo-BMT) and underwent allo-PBSCT using the same donor. Six patients received PBSCs as their initial allogeneic transplant. Filgrastim-mobilized PBSCs were collected from the donors in 3 to 4 aphereses and cryopreserved. The apheresis collections contained a median nucleated cell count of 16.5 x 10(8)/kg (range, 10.8 to 28.7 x 10(8), 10.7 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (range, 7.5 to 22.5 x 10(6)), and 300.0 x 10(6) CD3+ cells/kg (range, 127.8 to 1,523.2 x 10(6)). The median recovery of CD34+ progenitor cells after freezing, thawing, and washing was 106.4% (range, 36.7% to 132.0%). All patients received filgrastim posttransplant through engraftment, and cyclosporine and methylprednisolone were used for GVHD prophylaxis. Neutrophil recovery to greater than 0.5 x 10(9)/L and greater than 1.0 x 10(9)/L occurred at a median of 9 (range, 8 to 10) and 9 days (range, 8 to 11) posttransplant, respectively, which was similar to historical controls after allo-BMT and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy. Platelets recovered to greater than 20 x 10(9)/L and greater than 50 x 10(9)/L at a median of 12 (range, 8 to 25) and 15 days (range, 11 to 59), respectively, which was significantly more rapid than for the controls (P < .01). Donor cell engraftment was documented by cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and/or restriction fragment length polymorphisms with longest follow-up of 283 + days. Three patients developed grade 2 acute GVHD involving only the skin. Three of five evaluable patients show limited chronic GVHD. Cryopreserved, filgrastim-stimulated allogeneic PBSCs may be a suitable alternative to allogeneic marrow for transplantation with the advantage of more rapid platelet recovery. Acute GVHD was minimal despite the infusion of 1 log more CD3 cells than with marrow allografts. Further studies are required to assess long-term risks of chronic GVHD.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Acceptance and feasibility of peripheral stem cell mobilisation compared to bone marrow collection from healthy unrelated donors.

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation leads to an earlier engraftment compared to BMT. The feasibility, acceptance and long-term side-effects of G-CSF mobilisation of PBSC in unrelated healthy donors needs to be evaluated. Forty unrelated healthy donors received G-CSF in a dose of 10 microg/kg bodyweight for 5 days and two aphereses were performed. The donors were monitored prospectively. The data were compared to bone marrow harvests from unrelated donors. Almost all stem cell donors reported some side-effects due to Filgrastim application. Bone pain (32), headache (20), chest pain (two) and night sweats (one) were complained of. By taking analgesics, the pain was relieved in most cases. No donor discontinued the filgrastim application. Bone pain and headache resolved within 2-4 days after termination of Filgrastim application. There was, as expected, a seven-fold increase in the number of total WBCs. There were no significant changes of platelet counts during G-CSF application. After 4 weeks haemoglobin concentration and platelet counts showed no significant differences compared to baseline values. The aphereses were mostly tolerated very well. Eighteen donors reported paraesthesia, one donor developed dizziness, two complained of nausea and vomiting. There was a significant decrease in platelet count (242 before, 98 x 10(9)/l after aphereses). Autologous platelets were transfused after the second aphereses in four donors. These data were compared to data from 245 unrelated bone marrow donors, who had on average, 14 days bone pain and tiredness after donation. The G-CSF mobilisation and apheresis of peripheral blood stem cells is an alternative to traditional bone marrow harvesting in unrelated healthy donors. It is well tolerated and the duration of side-effects on average is shorter than after the surgical procedure. So far no long-term effects have been observed in the follow-up.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Agranulocytosis as a complication of acute infectious mononucleosis].

INTRODUCTION: Acute infections mononucleosis is the most common clinical manifestation of primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection occurring during adolescence. It is a benign lymphoproliferative, usually self-limiting disease. Complications are relatively rare, but they may occur, especially hematological. Most common are autoimmune hematolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia, and they respond to corticoid therapy. Deuteration of white blood cells is rather rare, whereas mild neutropenia is a normal finding during the course of acute disease. On the other hand, agranulocytosis is extremely rate, and almost every case has been reported in the literature. Filgrastim--the recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) stimulates the activation, proliferation and maturation of progenitor granulocyte cells. This drug is usually applied in treatment of iatrogenic neutropenia, during chemotherapy of malignancies and in some idiopathic and cyclic neutopenias. CASE REPORT: A female patient, 18 years of age, has been hospitalized at the Clinic of Infectious Diseases in Novi Sad on two occasions. First because of severe acute infectious mononucleosis with acute hepatitis and jaundice 10 days after onset of symptoms. Physical examination revealed severe intoxication, dehydration, icteric skin, mucosis and massive hepatosplenomegaly. The diagnosis was confirmed by ELISA IgM, EBV VCA positive and ELISA IgG EBV VCA and IgG EBVNA negative results. The patient was discharged from hospital after 24 days without complaints and with normal physical and laboratory findings. For several days she felt well, but gradually severe fatigue and malaise occurred and she became febrile again. That was the reason why she was hospitalized again, two weeks later. This time she was febrile, extremely intoxicated with general lymphadenopathy, catarrhal gingivostomatitis and massive splenomegaly. The first laboratory findings showed severe neutropenia (absolute count of granulocytes was 0.156 x 10/l, with only 12% segmented neutrophils). Mild anemia--3.05 x 10/l was also registered, while the platelet count was normal. Other biochemical analyses were normal, the Coombs' test negative, while the serological response was also normal. Bone marrow puncture was performed and normocellular bone marrow was registered, somewhere hypercellular due to hyperplasia of granulocyte progenitor cells from promyelocytes to normal maturated cells. Anemia showed megaloblastoid proliferation, while megakaryocytes were normal. High doses of corticosteroids were applied (dexamethasone 160 mg daily) and filgrastim 5 micrograms every other day. From the very beginning of therapy the patient felt better, whereas granulocytes responded with elevation as soon as 48 hours after initiation of therapy. On the sixth day the treatment was stopped because the level of granulocytes was normal and the patient has completely recovered. She was discharged from hospital 4 weeks later with mild meteorism, but normal physical and laboratory findings and mild splenomegaly registered only by ultrasonography. DISCUSSION: During the last 10 years only several cases of severe leukopenia with acute infectious mononucleosis had been reported in literature. In all cases it was associated with some other hematological complications and it occurred in young adults without previously registered immunodeficiency. We have no knowledge about application of filgrastim in treatment of EBV-induced agranulocytosis, but the International Association for Studying Agranulocytosis and Aplastic Anemia reported that in 4% of patients Epstein-Barr virus can cause agranulocytosis even a year after the occurrence of acute disease.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Phase I trial of docetaxel and vinorelbine in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: With preclinical evidence of synergy, this dose-finding trial examining the combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine given with prophylactic filgrastim for the treatment of patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma was undertaken. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma received vinorelbine as an intravenous push immediately followed by docetaxel as a 1-hour intravenous infusion once every 2 weeks at 1 of 7 different dose levels. Vinorelbine was escalated from 15 mg/m(2) (Level I) to 45 mg/m(2) (Level VII) and docetaxel was increased from 50 mg/m(2) (Level I) to 60 mg/m(2) (Level VII). Prophylactic corticosteroids and filgrastim were employed prospectively. RESULTS: After completion of dose Level VII, accrual was terminated because Phase II dose intensity of both agents had been reached and further escalation was believed to be unsafe. At dose Level VII, one episode of first-cycle febrile neutropenia and a death after three treatment cycles due to Haemophilus influenzae sepsis (Grade 5 toxicity according to the Common Toxicity Criteria of the National Cancer Institute) without neutropenia were noted. In all, 209 treatment cycles were administered and febrile neutropenia was observed in only 4 of these treatments (1.9%). Bacteremia occurred in three patients (four episodes) in the absence of neutropenia. Symptomatic onycholysis was observed in three patients. Clinically significant peripheral neuropathy and fluid retention were rare. Confirmed partial responses were noted in 10 patients for a response rate of 37% (95% confidence interval, 20-57%). CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m(2) and vinorelbine at a dose of 45 mg/m(2), both given every 2 weeks, can be combined safely to achieve Phase II dose intensity of both agents. An ongoing Phase II trial will define the activity of this treatment combination.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Pilot evaluation of high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by high-dose melphalan supported by peripheral blood stem cells in previously untreated advanced ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel and one consolidation cycle of high-dose melphalan with all cycles supported by hematopoietic stem cells and cytokine, in previously untreated patients with optimally debulked stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Patients had histologically documented epithelial ovarian cancer and optimal initial cytoreductive surgery. No prior chemotherapy was permitted. Adequate performance status, bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function was required. After being mobilized with cyclophosphamide 3 g/m(2), paclitaxel 300 mg/m(2), and filgrastim 5 microg/kg/day, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were collected by leukapheresis. Patients received three cycles of carboplatin AUC 15 mg. min/ml iv, paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2), and PBSC with filgrastim every 28 days, followed by one cycle of melphalan 140 mg/m(2) and hematopoietic support. RESULTS: Nine patients entered the trial and received all planned cycles of chemotherapy. Of the eight patients who consented to surgical reassessment upon completing therapy, four had residual small-volume macroscopic disease, three had microscopic residual disease, and one had pathologic complete response. The estimated probability of a pathologic complete response was 12.5% (95% confidence interval: 0.3-52.7%). Hematologic toxicity was severe but manageable. Eleven of 45 cycles (24.4%) resulted in hospital admission for neutropenic fever, dehydration +/- diarrhea, syncope, or shortness of breath and pain secondary to tense ascites. CONCLUSIONS: The low pathological complete response rate did not justify toxicity; thus, the study was closed. High-dose chemotherapy as first-line treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer remains experimental and should be restricted to clinical trials.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer in women 60 years and older: feasibility and tolerability in a subset of patients in a randomized trial.

To evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for older patients with node-positive breast cancer, a retrospective subset analysis compared dose delays and dose reductions for women aged > or = 60 years with those of younger women. Patients were randomized to a dose-dense (DD, 14-day cycle) or conventional-schedule (CS, 21-day cycle) regimen. DD patients (n = 104; 25 aged > or = 60 years) received epirubicin 90 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (four cycles), then cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 (CMF 600/40/600) (three cycles), plus filgrastim 5 microg/kg per day in every cycle. CS patients (n = 107; 27 aged > or = 60 years) received epirubicin 90 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (four cycles), then CMF 600/40/600 (three cycles), plus filgrastim if required. Delays were more common in older patients in both the DD and CS groups (DD, 17% versus 6%; CS, 11% versus 6%), as were Grades 3-4 leukopenia (26% versus 12%) and neutropenia (33% versus 25%). All older DD and 89% of older CS patients received all seven chemotherapy cycles, with 99% of cycles at full dose. This study demonstrates that a dose-dense regimen combining epirubicin and paclitaxel can be administered to patients > or = 60 years of age with a tolerable safety profile.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Feasibility of radiotherapy after high-dose dense chemotherapy with epirubicin, preceded by dexrazoxane, and paclitaxel for patients with high-risk Stage II-III breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To verify the feasibility of, and quantify the risk of, pneumonitis from locoregional radiotherapy (RT) after high-dose dense chemotherapy with epirubicin and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell support in patients with high-risk Stage II-III breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment consisted of a mobilizing course of epirubicin 150 mg/m2, preceded by dexrazoxane (Day 1), paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (Day 2), and filgrastim; followed by three courses of epirubicin 150 mg/m2, preceded by dexrazoxane (Day 1), paclitaxel 400 mg/m2 (Day 2), and peripheral blood progenitor cell support and filgrastim, every 16-19 days. After chemotherapy, patients were treated with locoregional RT, which included the whole breast or the chest wall, axilla, and supraclavicular area. RESULTS: Overall, 64 of 69 patients were evaluable. The interval between the end of chemotherapy and the initiation of RT was at least 1.5-2 months (mean 2). No treatment-related death was reported. After a median follow-up of 27 months from RT (range 5-77 months), neither clinically relevant radiation pneumonitis nor congestive heart failure had been reported. Minor and transitory lung and cardiac toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: Sequential high doses of epirubicin, preceded by dexrazoxane, and paclitaxel did not adversely affect the tolerability of locoregional RT in breast cancer patients. The risk of pneumonitis was not affected by the use of sequential paclitaxel with an interval of at least 1.5-2 months between the end of chemotherapy and the initiation of RT. Long-term follow-up is needed to define the risk of cardiotoxicity in these patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Hematologic abnormalities in children and young adults receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression following cardiothoracic transplantation.

To define the incidence, course, and etiology of hematologic abnormalities in children on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, we reviewed records of 106 transplant patients (70 heart, 16 heart and lung, 20 double lung), 0-21 yr of age, who were transplanted at the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh from 1989 to 1997. Fifty-four of the 106 patients (51%) developed 65 abnormal hematologic episodes (32 anemia, nine neutropenia, nine thrombocytopenia, 15 simultaneous anemia and neutropenia with or without thrombocytopenia). Common etiologies included: infections, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, and medications. Eleven episodes (seven anemia, one neutropenia, and three simultaneous anemia and neutropenia) had unclear etiologies and process of elimination suggested an association with tacrolimus. Interventions included filgrastim (effective in 15 of 15 patients, with resolution of neutropenia in a median of 5 days) and epoetin alfa (effective in five of 16 patients, including four of four patients with anemia possibly related to tacrolimus). Five patients (two with neutropenia and three with simultaneous neutropenia and anemia) were switched to cyclosporin A (CsA); rapid resolution occurred in four of the five patients, suggesting a possible association of the hematologic abnormalities with tacrolimus. In summary, hematologic abnormalities are common in children on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Most of these hematologic abnormalities are caused by common etiologies; however, a sub-population exists where tacrolimus may be the etiologic agent. Anemia and neutropenia respond to treatment with epoetin alfa and filgrastim. After thorough investigation, a trial switch to CsA may be warranted.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

A phase II study of weekly cisplatin, 6S-stereoisomer leucovorin and fluorouracil as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer.

The incidence of gastric cancer (GC) increases significantly after the fifth decade and palliative chemotherapy is the ultimate treatment in the majority of patients. We investigated safety and efficacy of a weekly regimen with cisplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced GC. Chemotherapy-naive patients older than 65 years were considered eligible for study entry. Frail elderly patients were identified and excluded according to the following criteria: age >85 years, dependence in one or more activities of daily living (activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living scales), three or more comorbid conditions, one or more geriatric syndromes. Chemotherapy consisted of 1-day per week administration of intravenous cisplatin 35 mg m(-2), 6S-stereoisomer leucovorin 250 mg m(-2) and fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2) (PLF). Patients were re-evaluated after eight weekly cycles and six additional weekly administrations were planned for patients without disease progression. A 5-day subcutaneous filgrastim (5 mug Kg(-1) day(-1), days +1-+5) was used after the first treatment delay for neutropenia and maintained thereafter. In the whole group, the best intention-to-treat overall response rate was 43% (95% CI: 30-56%). The time to disease progression and the median survival time were 5.3 and 8.6 months, respectively. Fatigue was the commonest nonhaematologic toxicity (71% of the patients). Filgrastim was used in 30 patients who showed grade II (20 patients) or grade III (10 patients) neutropenia. Neither grade IV toxicity nor toxic deaths were observed. The weekly PLF regimen resulted safe and effective in elderly patients with advanced GC. This outpatient regimen is based on old and low-cost drugs and it may represent an alternative to new and more expensive combinations.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1999

Randomized trial of peripheral blood progenitor cell vs bone marrow as hematopoietic support for high-dose chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease: a clinical and molecular analysis.

Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and unstimulated bone marrow (BM) were evaluated and compared for reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy in patients with relapsed Hodgkin's disease (HD) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with respect to engraftment, overall and relapse-free survival, and contamination by lymphoma cells using molecular analysis of immunoglobulin gene rearrangements. Forty-four patients with either NHL or HD underwent autologous transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive either Filgrastim-mobilized PBPC (n = 15) or unstimulated BM (n = 14). An additional 15 patients received PBPC without randomization because of a recent history of marrow involvement by lymphoma. Use of PBPC was associated with faster neutrophil engraftment than BM (11 vs 14 days to an absolute neutrophil count >0.5 x 10(9)/l, P = 0.04), but without any difference in platelet engraftment, infectious complications, or overall or event-free survival. Both BM (65%) and PBPC (73%) were frequently contaminated by tumor cells as assessed by CDR3 analysis. Patients with negative polymerase chain reaction analysis of a BM sample during the study had a trend towards an improved survival; however, BM involvement by disease had no impact on the ability to mobilize or collect PBPC. We conclude that PBPC are as effective as BM in reconstituting hematopoiesis after high-dose chemotherapy and that both products are frequently contaminated by sequences marking the malignant clone.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Phase 1 study of pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF) in breast cancer patients after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation.

Forty-seven patients with stage II, III, or IV breast cancer undergoing autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation were randomized to placebo (n = 13) or to one of five sequential dose cohorts of pegylated (PEG) recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF) (1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, or 10.0 microg/kg/day) (n= 34). Blinded study drug was started on the day of transplantation and was continued until the platelet count was > or =100 x 109/l or a maximum of 21 days. PBPCs were mobilized with filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) and all patients received filgrastim starting on day +2 after transplantation. The nadir platelet count was not affected by treatment. The median time to platelet recovery was 11 and 12 days for the placebo and combined PEG-rHuMGDF groups, respectively. No trends in adverse events suggested dose- or treatment-related toxicity. Two patients withdrew from the study because of an adverse event (allergic reaction in the 7.5 microg/kg group) probably related to study drug, and veno-occlusive disease (VOD) (in the 5 microg/kg group) which was felt not to be related to study drug by the investigator. No patients developed neutralizing antibodies to MGDF. Day +21 and day +28 platelet counts were higher in the group receiving PEG-rHuMGDF (246 vs 148 x 109/l and 299 vs 145 x 109/l, respectively; both P < 0. 05). PEG-rHuMGDF up to 10 microg/kg/day was well tolerated. In this study, there was no effect of study drug on initial platelet engraftment at the doses studied. However, the efficacy of other doses is unknown.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Glycosylated vs non-glycosylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)--results of a prospective randomised monocentre study.

The discovery of the haematopoietic growth factor granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has reduced infection-related morbidity in cancer patients by alleviating post-chemotherapy neutropenia. Two formulations of recombinant human (rh) G-CSF, one glycosylated and one non-glycosylated, are available. The glycosylated form, lenograstim, possesses at least 25% greater bioactivity in vitro. Some comparative studies into the preparation's potential to mobilise haematopoietic stem cells suggest a similar advantage. In the light of the great clinical importance of G-CSF, we have performed the first prospective, randomised, crossover study on children with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. G-CSF (250 microg/m(2)) was started 1 day after the chemotherapy block, and was administered until a WBC >1500/microl was achieved on 3 successive days. Thirty-three G-CSF cycles from 11 patients (16 lenograstim, 17 filgrastim) were studied. They were investigated for duration of very severe (WBC <500/microl, 9 vs 9.5 days, lenograstim vs filgrastim, median) and severe leukopenia (WBC <1000/microl, 11 vs 11 days), infections (CRP >5 mg/dl, 5 vs 5.5 days), infection-related hospital stay (11 vs 9 days) and antibiotic treatment (9 vs 9 days). Statistical evaluation by paired analysis could not detect any difference between treatment groups; the median difference for all end-points was zero. In summary, at least at 250 microg/m(2), in terms of their clinical effect on neutropenia, the two G-CSF preparations appear to have identical activity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Differences between graft product and donor side effects following bone marrow or stem cell donation.

We report graft product stem cell yields and donor safety results of a randomized multicenter study comparing allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) PBSC transplantation with BM transplantation. Matched HLA-identical sibling donors (n=329) were randomized to filgrastim-mobilized PBSC or bone marrow (BM) donation groups. Median yields per kg recipient weight of CD34(+) cells, T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells, respectively, were approximately two-fold, eight-fold, and greater than eight-fold in the PBSC group than in the BM group (CD34(+) cells, 5.8 x 10(6)/kg vs 2.7 x 10(6)/kg; T cells, 300.1 x 10(6)/kg vs 35.7 x 10(6)/kg; NK cells, 28.2 x 10(6)/kg vs 3.6 x 10(6)/kg; P<0.001 for each). In connection with the cell collection procedures, PBSC donors spent a shorter median time in hospital than BM donors (0 vs 2 days; median difference -2 days, 95% CI -2 to 2) and had fewer median days of restricted activity (2 vs 6 days; median difference -3 days, 95% CI -4 to 2). Overall, 65% of PBSC donors and 57% of BM donors reported at least one adverse event (AE), most of which were transient, mild-moderate in severity, and without clinical sequelae. PBSC donors experienced predominantly filgrastim-related AEs, while BM donors experienced predominantly harvest-related AEs.

Adolescent↗