Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DROSOPHILA”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29Linked to original sources

The phytopathogenic bacteria Erwinia carotovora infects Drosophila and activates an immune response.

Although Drosophila possesses potent immune responses, little is known about the microbial pathogens that infect Drosophila. We have identified members of the bacterial genus Erwinia that induce the systemic expression of genes encoding antimicrobial peptides in Drosophila larvae after ingestion. These Erwinia strains are phytopathogens and use flies as vectors; our data suggest that these strains have also evolved mechanisms for exploiting their insect vectors as hosts. Erwinia infections induce an antimicrobial response in Drosophila larvae with a preferential expression of antibacterial versus antifungal peptide-encoding genes. Antibacterial peptide gene expression after Erwinia infection is reduced in two Drosophila mutants that have reduced numbers of hemocytes, suggesting that blood cells play a role in regulating Drosophila antimicrobial responses and also illustrating that this Drosophila-Erwinia interaction provides a powerful model for dissecting host-pathogen relationships.

Animals↗

Cortactin associates with the cell-cell junction protein ZO-1 in both Drosophila and mouse.

Cortactin is an actin filament-binding protein localizing at cortical regions of cells and a prominent substrate for Src family protein-tyrosine kinases in response to multiple extracellular stimuli. Human cortactin has been identified as a protein product of a putative oncogene, EMS1. In this report, we describe the identification of a Drosophila homolog of cortactin as a molecule that interacts with Drosophila ZO-1 using yeast two-hybrid screening. Drosophila cortactin is a 559-amino acid protein highly expressed in embryos, larvae, and pupae but relatively underexpressed in adult flies. Deletion and substitution mutant analyses revealed that the SH3 domain of Drosophila cortactin binds to a PXXP motif in the proline-rich domain of Drosophila ZO-1. Colocalization of these proteins at cell-cell junction sites was evident under a confocal laser-scanning microscope. In vivo association was confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation of cortactin and ZO-1 from Drosophila embryo lysates. We also demonstrate an association for each of the murine homologs by immunoprecipitation analyses of mouse tissue lysates. Our previous work has demonstrated the involvement of ZO-1 in a signaling pathway that regulates expression of the emc gene in Drosophila. The potential roles of the cortactin.ZO-1 complex in cell adhesion and cell signaling are discussed.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Laminin in the male germ cells of Drosophila.

To study genes that may be crucial for the male germ cell development of Drosophila we screened a cDNA expression library with a polyclonal antiserum against testis proteins of Drosophila hydei. We identified a cDNA fragment that exhibited a complete sequence similarity with the cDNA of the laminin B2 chain, an important component of the extracellular matrix. Transcripts of laminin B2 were detected in the RNA of male germ cells with the polymerase chain reaction and by in situ hybridization. We studied the reaction of different polyclonal antibodies including those against a Drosophila laminin B2-lac fusion protein, the entire Drosophila laminin complex, or against the mouse laminin complex and against laminin A and B1 chains with specific structures in developing male germ cells of Drosophila. Antigenic sites against laminin B2 were found in the lampbrush loops in primary spermatocyte nuclei, in nuclei of spermatids, and in heads of spermatozoa. The axonemes of elongating spermatids react with antibodies against the Drosophila laminin B1, B2 and laminin A chains. The possible biological functions of the laminin in the male germ cells of Drosophila are discussed.

Animals↗

X chromosomes and autosomes evolve at similar rates in Drosophila: no evidence for faster-X protein evolution.

Recent data from Drosophila suggest that a substantial fraction of amino acid substitutions observed between species are beneficial. If these beneficial mutations are on average partially recessive, then the rate of protein evolution is predicted to be faster for X-linked genes compared to autosomal genes (the "faster-X" hypothesis). We test this prediction by comparing rates of protein substitutions between orthologous genes, taking advantage of variations in chromosome fusions within the genus Drosophila. In members of the Drosophila melanogaster species group, the chromosomal arm 3L segregates as an ordinary autosome (i.e., two homologous copies in both males and females). However, in the Drosophila pseudoobscura species group, this chromosomal arm has become fused to the ancestral X chromosome and is hemizygous in males. The faster-X hypothesis predicts that protein evolution should be faster for genes on this chromosomal arm in the D. pseudoobscura lineage, relative to the D. melanogaster lineage. Here we combine new sequence data for 202 gene fragments in Drosophila miranda (in the pseudoobscura species group) with the completed genomes of D. melanogaster, D. pseudoobscura, and Drosophila yakuba to show that there are no detectable differences in rates of amino acid evolution for orthologous X-linked and autosomal genes. Our results imply that the contribution of the faster-X (if any) to the large-X effect on reproductive isolation in Drosophila is not due to a generally faster rate of protein evolution. The lack of a detectable faster-X effect in these species suggests either that beneficial amino acids are not partially recessive on average, or that adaptive evolution does not often use newly arising amino acid mutations.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

Species-specific signals for the splicing of a short Drosophila intron in vitro.

The effects of branchpoint sequence, the pyrimidine stretch, and intron size on the splicing efficiency of the Drosophila white gene second intron were examined in nuclear extracts from Drosophila and human cells. This 74-nucleotide intron is typical of many Drosophila introns in that it lacks a significant pyrimidine stretch and is below the minimum size required for splicing in human nuclear extracts. Alteration of sequences of adjacent to the 3' splice site to create a pyrimidine stretch was necessary for splicing in human, but not Drosophila, extracts. Increasing the size of this intron with insertions between the 5' splice site and the branchpoint greatly reduced the efficiency of splicing of introns longer than 79 nucleotides in Drosophila extracts but had an opposite effect in human extracts, in which introns longer than 78 nucleotides were spliced with much greater efficiency. The white-apricot copia insertion is immediately adjacent to the branchpoint normally used in the splicing of this intron, and a copia long terminal repeat insertion prevents splicing in Drosophila, but not human, extracts. However, a consensus branchpoint does not restore the splicing of introns containing the copia long terminal repeat, and alteration of the wild-type branchpoint sequence alone does not eliminate splicing. These results demonstrate species specificity of splicing signals, particularly pyrimidine stretch and size requirements, and raise the possibility that variant mechanisms not found in mammals may operate in the splicing of small introns in Drosophila and possibly other species.

Animals↗

Evolutionary conservation of otd/Otx2 transcription factor action: a genome-wide microarray analysis in Drosophila.

BACKGROUND: Homeobox genes of the orthodenticle (otd)/Otx family have conserved roles in the embryogenesis of head and brain. Gene replacement experiments show that the Drosophila otd gene and orthologous mammalian Otx genes are functionally equivalent, in that overexpression of either gene in null mutants of Drosophila or mouse can restore defects in cephalic and brain development. This suggests that otd and Otx genes control a comparable subset of downstream target genes in either organism. Here we use quantitative transcript imaging to analyze this equivalence of otd and Otx gene action at a genomic level. RESULTS: Oligonucleotide arrays representing 13,400 annotated Drosophila genes were used to study differential gene expression in flies in which either the Drosophila otd gene or the human Otx2 gene was overexpressed. Two hundred and eighty-seven identified transcripts showed highly significant changes in expression levels in response to otd overexpression, and 682 identified transcripts showed highly significant changes in expression levels in response to Otx2 overexpression. Among these, 93 showed differential expression changes following overexpression of either otd or Otx2, and for 90 of these, comparable changes were observed under both experimental conditions. We postulate that these transcripts are common downstream targets of the fly otd gene and the human Otx2 gene in Drosophila. CONCLUSION: Our experiments indicate that approximately one third of the otd-regulated transcripts also respond to overexpression of the human Otx2 gene in Drosophila. These common otd/Otx2 downstream genes are likely to represent the molecular basis of the functional equivalence of otd and Otx2 gene action in Drosophila.

Animals↗

Chromatin decondensation in Drosophila embryo extracts.

Decondensation of sperm chromatin in cell-free Drosophila embryo extracts was efficient, rapid, and synchronous. The decondensation activity was N-ethylmaleimide-resistant, soluble, and heat-stable. Two specific proteins, X and Y, were removed selectively from Xenopus sperm coincident with morphological decondensation. A heat-stable protein, p22, was purified to apparent homogeneity from Drosophila melanogaster embryos by a procedure optimized for the purification of Xenopus laevis nucleoplasmin. Although itself capable of catalyzing decondensation of Xenopus sperm, the precise relationship of Drosophila p22 to Xenopus nucleoplasmin is unclear. Drosophila p22 and Xenopus nucleoplasmin were immunologically distinct. Moreover, p22 was present as a nuclear protein throughout Drosophila development as determined both by immunoblot and by indirect immunofluorescence analyses. Drosophila embryo extracts largely or completely immunodepleted of p22 lost some but not all heat-stable decondensation activity. These observations lead to the conclusion that Drosophila embryo extracts contain at least two heat-stable sperm decondensation factors.

Animals↗

A Drosophila homologue of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe act2 gene.

Diverse proteins that are 35% to 55% identical to actins have been discovered recently in yeasts, nematodes, and vertebrates. In order to study these proteins systematically and relate their functions to those of conventional actins, we are isolating the corresponding genes from the genetically tractable eukaryote, Drosophila melanogaster. Here we report the isolation and partial characterization of a Drosophila homologue of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe act2 gene. Degenerate oligonucleotide primers specifying peptides that are highly conserved within the actin protein superfamily were used in conjunction with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify a portion of the Drosophila gene that we have named actr66B. The corresponding full-length cDNA sequence encodes a protein of 418 residues that is 65% identical to the product of the S. pombe act2 gene, 80% identical to the bovine act2 homologue, but only 48% identical to the principal Drosophila cytoplasmic actin encoded by the Act5C actin gene. Alignment of the yeast, bovine, and Drosophila actin-related proteins shows that they have four peptide insertions, relative to conventional actins, three of which are well placed to modify actin polymerization and one that is likely to perturb the binding of myosin. Locations of two of the five actr66B introns are conserved between Drosophila and yeast genes, further attesting that they evolved from a common ancestor and are likely to encode proteins having similar functions. We demonstrate that the Drosophila gene is located on the left arm of chromosome 3, within subdivision 66B. Finally, we show by RNA blot-hybridization that the gene is expressed at low levels, relative to conventional nonmuscle actin, in all developmental stages. From these and other observations we infer that the actr66B protein is a minor component of all cells, perhaps serving to modify the polymerization, structure, and dynamic behavior of actin filaments.

Actins↗

Structure of the vertical and horizontal system neurons of the lobula plate in Drosophila.

The lobula plate in the optic lobe of the fly brain is a high-order processing center for visual information. Within the lobula plate lie a small number of giant neurons that are responsible for the detection of wide field visual motion. Although the structure and motion sensitivity of these cells have been extensively described in large flies, the system has not been described systematically in Drosophila. Here, we use the mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) system to analyze a subset of these cells, the horizontal and vertical systems. Our results suggest that the Drosophila horizontal system is similar to those described in larger flies, with three neurons fanning their dendrites over the lobula plate. We found that there are six neurons in the Drosophila vertical system, a figure that compares with 9-11 neurons in large flies. Even so, the Drosophila vertical system closely resembles the systems of larger flies, with each neuron in Drosophila having an approximate counterpart in large flies. This anatomical similarity implies that the inputs to the vertical system are similarly organized in these various fly species, and that it is likely that the Drosophila neurons respond to motions similar to those sensed by their specific structural counterparts in large flies. Additionally, the similar appearance of vertical system cells in multiple cell clones demonstrates that they share a common developmental lineage. Access to these cells in Drosophila should allow for the use of genetic tools in future studies of horizontal and vertical system function.

Animals↗

Identification of a retinal protein in Drosophila with antibody to the alpha subunit of bovine brain G(o) protein.

An antibody directed against the alpha(o) subunit of bovine brain G(o) (R4) was used to identify a Drosophila retinal protein which may be the analogue of vertebrate transducin. The immunoreactivity appears predominantly in the retinal and occellar rhabdomeres. On a Western blot, the antibody recognizes a 41 kDa protein that is present in the heads of yellow white flies, but not in the heads of eyeless mutant flies, eyes absent. This protein is not recognized by an antibody raised against Drosophila alpha(o). Antibody R4 intensely stains rhabdomeres and, to a lesser extent, the neuropil of the central nervous system in tissue sections of adult flies. Antibody to Drosophila alpha(o) stains the neuropil of the central nervous system, but does not stain rhabdomeres. In developing flies, faint immunoreactivity appears in the retinal rhabdomeres at about 70% of the time through pupal development and increases to its apparent adult maximal level about 1 day after eclosion. Tissue sections from a phototransduction mutant, norp A, have retinal immunoreactivity at normal levels up to about 1 week after eclosion, but by 2 weeks, immunoreactivity has largely disappeared. This disappearance parallels the degeneration of the retina in norp A mutants. In Drosophila and other invertebrates, light activates a phospholipase C in the retina. The identification of a protein in Drosophila rhabdomeres with an antibody raised against a mammalian G protein alpha subunit thought to be involved in phospholipase C activation suggests that there may be common structural features between the putative Drosophila transducin and alpha(o). The identification of regions common to mammalian alpha(o) and Drosophila transducin may then provide clues to the structural requirements for PLC activation.

Animals↗

Drosophila fibronectin: a protein that shares properties similar to those of its mammalian homologue.

This is the first report on the existence in Drosophila of a protein with properties similar to those of vertebrate fibronectin that we shall refer to as Drosophila fibronectin. Rabbit antibodies against human plasma fibronectin have allowed the detection of this molecule in Drosophila haemolymph; common epitopes are shared by the two proteins. Drosophila fibronectin with a subunit mol. wt of approximately 230 kd is a glycoprotein which binds to denatured mammalian collagen. It is present throughout development and is as abundant in embryos as in larvae and adult flies. Drosophila fibronectin is differentially expressed during embryogenesis, a small amount being present before the blastoderm stage. Its concentration increases at gastrulation and reaches a steady-state value at the end of organogenesis. Drosophila fibronectin is predominantly detected by immunofluorescence on frozen sections of 16 h embryos in the extracellular spaces lying between the different tissues and organs. In mature third instar larvae, most of the staining is concentrated in fat body and imaginal discs, and the pattern strongly supports an extracellular localization of the protein. In addition, it is shown that Drosophila embryonic cells can functionally utilize vertebrate fibronectin for their spreading and differentiation. Finally, injection of antihuman plasma fibronectin antibodies in early embryos leads to the same phenotype as injection of Arg-Gly-Asp-containing peptides. This result suggests that one of the Arg-Gly-Asp-bearing protein(s) involved in gastrulation might be fibronectin.

Animals↗

Phylogeny of Drosophila and related genera: conflict between molecular and anatomical analyses.

Drosophila species are extensively used in biological research; yet, important phylogenetic relationships within the genus and with related genera remain unresolved. The combined data for three genes (Adh, Sod, and Gpdh) statistically resolves outstanding issues. We define the genus Drosophila inclusively so as to include Scaptomyza and Zaprionus (considered distinct genera in the taxonomy of Wheeler, 1981) but excluding Scaptodrosophila. The genus Drosophila so defined is monophyletic. The subgenus Sophophora (including the melanogaster, obscura, and willistoni groups) is monophyletic and the sister clade to all other Drosophila subgenera. The Hawaiian Drosophila (including Scaptomyza) is a monophyletic group, but the subgenus Drosophila is not monophyletic, because the immigrans group is more closely related to the subgenus Hirtodrosophila than to other species of the subgenus Drosophila, such as the virilis and repleta groups.

Alcohol Dehydrogenase↗

Cytosolic glutathione S-transferases in Drosophila melanogaster.

Post-microsomal supernatants from Drosophila melanogaster and rat liver homogenates were investigated with respect to their glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity. It appeared that the Drosophila transferase did not conjugate the epoxides styrene-7,8-oxide and 1,2 epoxy-3(p-nitrophenoxy)-propane. Attempts to isolate the Drosophila GST isozymes by means of the well-documented method for the purification of the rat liver transferases failed, because the Drosophila transferases did not bind to CM-cellulose. Purification by subsequent ion exchange on DEAE-cellulose, molecular sieving on Sephadex G-100 and hydroxylapatite chromatography, revealed three active fractions from Drosophila cytosol and five active fractions from rat liver cytosol, using 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene as the electrophilic substrate. None of the Drosophila active fractions catalyzed the conjugation of glutathione with the epoxides mentioned. It is concluded that there are important differences between the GST systems of both species, resulting in differences in the metabolic fate of chemicals that are substrates for glutathione conjugation. This has to be taken into account in the evaluation of genotoxicity testing in Drosophila of potentially harmful compounds.

Animals↗

Xenobiotica-metabolizing enzymes in Drosophila melanogaster: activities of epoxide hydratase and glutathione S-transferase compared with similar activities in rat liver.

Activities of epoxide hydratase and glutathione (GSH) S-transferase were investigated in subcellular fractions of Drosophila melanogaster, and these activities were compared with analogous enzymic activities in extracts from rat liver. Microsomes of Drosophila were active in the hydratation of styrene oxide catalyzed by epoxide hydratase. The post-microsomal supernatant of Drosophila catalyzed the conjugation of GSH with 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene. However, GSH S-transferase activity with styrene oxide as the electrophilic substrate was not measurable. The respective specific activities of epoxide hydratase (per mg microsomal protein) and GSH S-transferase (per mg cytosolic protein) were factors of 5- and 10-fold lower than the corresponding activities in rat liver. However, when expressed per gram body weight, activities of both epoxide hydratase and GSH S-transferase were 3 times higher for Drosophila enzymes. The apparent Km values for the two Drosophila enzymes were higher, whereas the apparent Km values were lower, than the values found for the rat-liver enzymes. Among 3 different Drosophila strains (a wild-type, a white eye-color carrying mutant strain and a DDT-resistant strain), preliminary experiments showed no differences as far as these two enzymic activities were concerned. It is concluded that the results obtained in genetic toxicology testing with Drosophila are probably relevant to effects to be expected in mammalian systems with compounds requiring metabolic processes involving the enzymes investigated here.

Animals↗

Role of oxidative stress in Drosophila aging.

We review the role that oxidative damage plays in regulating the lifespan of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. Results from our laboratory show that the lifespan of Drosophila is inversely correlated to its metabolic rate. The consumption of oxygen by adult insects is related to the rate of damage induced by oxygen radicals, which are purported to be generated as by-products of respiration. Moreover, products of activated oxygen species such as hydrogen peroxide and lipofuscin are higher in animals kept under conditions of increased metabolic rate. In order to understand the in vivo relationship between oxidative damage and the production of the superoxide radical, we generated transgenic strains of Drosophila melanogaster that synthesize excess levels of enzymatically active superoxide dismutase. This was accomplished by P-element transformation of Drosophila melanogaster with the bovine cDNA for CuZn superoxide dismutase, an enzyme that catalyzes the dismutation of the superoxide radical to hydrogen peroxide and water. Adult flies that express the bovine SOD in addition to native Drosophila SOD are more resistant to oxidative stresses and have a slight but significant increase in their mean lifespan. Thus, resistance to oxidative stress and lifespan of Drosophila can be manipulated by molecular genetic intervention. In addition, we have examined the ability of adult flies to respond to various environmental stresses during senescence. Resistance to oxidative stress, such as that induced by heat shock, is drastically reduced in senescent flies. This loss of resistance is correlated with the increase in protein damage generated in old flies by thermal stress and by the insufficient protection from cellular defense systems which includes the heat shock proteins as well as the oxygen radical scavenging enzymes. Collectively, results from our laboratory demonstrate that oxidative damage plays a role in governing the lifespan of Drosophila during normal metabolism and under conditions of environmental stress.

Aging↗

Subunit protein-affinity isolation of Drosophila DNA polymerase catalytic subunit.

gfLittle is known at present about the biochemical properties of very large-sized Drosophila DNA polymerases. In a previous study, we tried to purify Drosophila pol. catalytic subunit from embryos through seven column chromatographies and study its biochemical properties. However, we failed to characterize it precisely because an insufficient amount of the enzyme was generated. In this report, we describe direct purification from Drosophila embryos to near homogeneity using Drosophila DNA polymerase second subunit (Drosophila pol. 2) protein-conjugated affinity column chromatography and characterization of the enzyme in detail. To our knowledge this is the first demonstration of native DNA polymerase purification with activity using a subunit protein-affinity column. We observed new characteristics of Drosophila pol. catalytic subunit as follows: Drosophila pol. catalytic subunit synthesized DNA processively in the presence of both Mn(2+) and Mg(2+) ions, but Mn(2+) inhibited the 3'-5' proofreading activity, thereby decreasing the fidelity of DNA replication by 50%.

Animals↗

Phylogenetic incongruence in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.

Drosophila melanogaster and its close relatives are used extensively in comparative biology. Despite the importance of phylogenetic information for such studies, relationships between some melanogaster species group members are unclear due to conflicting phylogenetic signals at different loci. In this study, we use twelve nuclear loci (eleven coding and one non-coding) to assess the degree of phylogenetic incongruence in this model system. We focus on two nodes: (1) the node joining the Drosophila erecta-Drosophila orena, Drosophila melanogaster-Drosophila simulans, and Drosophila yakuba-Drosophila teissieri lineages, and (2) the node joining the lineages leading to the melanogaster, takahashii, and eugracilis subgroups. We find limited evidence for incongruence at the first node; our data, as well as those of several previous studies, strongly support monophyly of a clade consisting of D. erecta-D. orena and D. yakuba-D. teissieri. By contrast, using likelihood based tests of congruence, we find robust evidence for topological incongruence at the second node. Different loci support different relationships among the melanogaster, takahashii, and eugracilis subgroups, and the observed incongruence is not easily attributable to homoplasy, non-equilibrium base composition, or positive selection on a subset of loci. We argue that lineage sorting in the common ancestor of these three subgroups is the most plausible explanation for our observations. Such lineage sorting may lead to biased estimation of tree topology and evolutionary rates, and may confound inferences of positive selection.

Animals↗

Drosophila muscle regulation characterized by electron microscopy and three-dimensional reconstruction of thin filament mutants.

Wild-type and mutant thin filaments were isolated directly from "myosinless" Drosophila indirect flight muscles to study the structural basis of muscle regulation genetically. Negatively stained filaments showed tropomyosin with periodically arranged troponin complexes in electron micrographs. Three-dimensional helical reconstruction of wild-type filaments indicated that the positions of tropomyosin on actin in the presence and absence of Ca(2+) were indistinguishable from those in vertebrate striated muscle and consistent with a steric mechanism of regulation by troponin-tropomyosin in Drosophila muscles. Thus, the Drosophila model can be used to study steric regulation. Thin filaments from the Drosophila mutant heldup(2), which possesses a single amino acid conversion in troponin I, were similarly analyzed to assess the Drosophila model genetically. The positions of tropomyosin in the mutant filaments, in both the Ca(2+)-free and the Ca(2+)-induced states, were the same, and identical to that of wild-type filaments in the presence of Ca(2+). Thus, cross-bridge cycling would be expected to proceed uninhibited in these fibers, even in relaxing conditions, and this would account for the dramatic hypercontraction characteristic of these mutant muscles. The interaction of mutant troponin I with Drosophila troponin C is discussed, along with functional differences between troponin C from Drosophila and vertebrates.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗