Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DIURETICS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29Linked to original sources

Diuretic-induced renal impairment without volume depletion in cirrhosis: changes in the renin-angiotensin system and the effect of beta-adrenergic blockade.

In 4 patients with cirrhosis and ascites, diuretic therapy resulted in an impairment of renal function that was associated with a rise in plasma renin activity (PRA). In 3, this occurred in the absence of volume depletion. When diuretics were discontinued, renal function returned to normal. beta-adrenergic blocking drugs were then given to suppress renin secretion and diuretics restarted. On this occasion, impairment of renal function did not occur. In 2 further patients, administration of beta-adrenergic blockers during a period of diuretic-induced renal impairment resulted in an improvement in renal function. Although these findings may indicate that diuretic-induced renal impairment in cirrhosis is at least partly due to activation of the renin-angiotensin system, in another group of patients a diuretic-induced rise in PRA was not associated with a deterioration in renal function.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Thiazide diuretics, potassium, and the development of diabetes: a quantitative review.

National guidelines and a recent clinical trial have supported the use of thiazide diuretics as the preferred initial pharmacological treatment for hypertension. However, evidence from this and other clinical trials have also found an increased incidence of new onset diabetes among those patients receiving thiazide diuretics. The mechanisms responsible for the increased incidence of diabetes with thiazide diuretics have not been fully elucidated. This article provides a review of intervention studies that included data on the relation between thiazide-induced hypokalemia and glucose intolerance. We conducted a literature search from 1966 to June 2004 to identify clinical trials using thiazide diuretics where the metabolic effects on potassium and glucose are reported. A total of 59 clinical trials constituting 83 thiazide diuretic study arms were identified. Trial size, length, type of thiazide diuretic, and dose varied substantially among the studies. The association between average changes in potassium and glucose in the study arms is considered jointly in a weighted statistical model. The Pearson's correlation coefficient, weighted by study sample size, for the relationship between glucose and potassium was -0.54 (95% CI, -0.67 to -0.36; P < 0.01). A sensitivity analysis, which considered subset analyses and effect of covariates, as well as inverse-variance weighting, supported this finding. These data suggest that thiazide-induced hypokalemia is associated with increased blood glucose. Treatment of thiazide-induced hypokalemia may reverse glucose intolerance and possibly prevent the future development of diabetes.

Blood Glucose↗

Probable loop diuretic-induced pancreatitis in a sulfonamide-allergic patient.

OBJECTIVE: To report the case of a patient with a prior allergy to a sulfonamide antibiotic who subsequently developed the same reaction when administered various loop diuretics. CASE SUMMARY: A 57-year-old female with cardiomyopathy and "sulfa" (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) allergy documented as pancreatitis presented with symptoms consistent with pancreatitis after use of furosemide. She subsequently developed similar symptoms after multiple rechallenges with various loop diuretics including furosemide, bumetanide, and torsemide. The patient was placed on ethacrynic acid until she was desensitized to furosemide. She had been receiving oral furosemide for 5 months at the time of this report, with no complications. According to the Naranjo probability scale, this reaction was probable. DISCUSSION: Reactions associated with arylamine sulfonamide-containing antibiotics have been commonly reported; however, cross-reactions with non-arylamine sulfonamide-containing medications have been rare. The time delay by which symptoms of pancreatitis presented following administration of loop diuretics suggests an immunologic pathway. In addition, while cases of loop diuretic-induced pancreatitis, including furosemide, have been published, the allergic manifestations with both sulfonamide antibiotics and non-antibiotics in our patient suggest possible cross-reactivity between these 2 drug classes. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism by which loop diuretics induce pancreatitis appears to be via an immunologic pathway. While the true correlation remains unknown, allergic cross-reactivity may occur between sulfonamide antibiotics and non-antibiotics, such as loop diuretics. Torsemide appears to also be a part of a long list of agents that can cause pancreatitis.

Cardiomyopathies↗

Studies on the metabolic fate of m17055, a novel diuretic (5): pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of unchanged drug in rat and dog after intravenous administration of M17055.

The pharmacokinetics and pharamacodynamics of M17055, a novel diuretic were studied after a single intravenous administration to rats and dogs, the two species used in the pharmacological and toxicological studies. No gender dependent response to systemic exposure was observed at the high dose level in rats, in agreement with the determined LD(50). A gender difference in urinary excretion of M17055, however, was clearly observed in rats. The slower elimination and the lower total body clearance (CLtot) values of M17055 in dogs reflect the difference of the no-effect level (NOEL) between rats (0.1 mg/kg) and dogs (0.03 mg/kg) well. The diuretic response was well correlated with the urinary M17055 excretion rate by fitting to a sigmoid E(max) model in both rats and dogs. The derived ER(50) value of M17055 in dogs was approximately 10 times less than that reported for furosemide, suggesting that the intrinsic potency of M17055 is equal to or higher than those of other powerful loop diuretics. Although diuretic sensitivity was considered to be lower in dogs than in rats, the higher amount of M17055 reaching the dog kidney is likely to compensate for this. The diuretic response in female rats was predictable by using the pharmacodynamic parameters derived from male rats. These results show that the apparent high diuretic potency and the other pivotal observations for M17055 found in the pharmacological and toxicological studies can be rationalized by the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the unchanged compound.

Journal Article↗

Enhanced renin levels after discontinuation of furosemide: additional effects of loop diuretics on renin release.

The rate of recovery of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis after stopping diuretic administration was examined in 18 male patients with essential hypertension. Upright plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma aldosterone (PA) were measured during sodium restriction (10 mEq sodium intake), after three days of furosemide administration (40 mg BID po) and for five days following cessation of the diuretic. After diuretic administration, the mean PRA level (8.2 +/- 1.7 ng/ml/hr) was significantly elevated compared to the level on low sodium diet (4.2 +/- 0.5 ng/ml/hr). However, the major finding was that PRA levels continued to increase significantly compared to levels during diuresis on days 1 (11.3 +/- 1.7 ng/ml/hr) and 2 (10.8 +/- 1.5 ng/ml/hr) of the postdiuretic period. Mean PA values paralleled PRA responses in the study. Infusion of normal saline on postdiuretic day 1 failed to suppress PRA to levels seen in subjects not receiving diuretics. The postdiuretic period was accompanied by increased urinary sodium reabsorption and decreased urinary potassium excretion and by significant decreases in creatinine, PAH and free water clearance. The mechanism of this sustained renin response several days after cessation of diuretic therapy may be best explained by a prolonged action of furosemide or by partial ongoing volume depletion with reduced sodium load to the distal nephron. Since all patients demonstrated a marked and consistent PRA response after diuretic withdrawal, this time period represents a potent stimulatory challenge for monitering renin responses.

Adult↗

Long-acting and short-acting diuretics in mild essential hypertension.

A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study was conducted in 14 patients with mild essential hypertension comparing different regimens of administration of the "short-acting" diuretic, chlorothiazide and the "long-acting" diuretic, chlorthalidone. There were 6 randomised treatment phases each of 5 weeks duration. For blood pressure recorded both at the Clinic and at home the most prominent effects were seen with standing blood pressure, for which significant reductions of mean blood pressure compared to the placebo phase were observed with chlorthalidone 25 mg once daily (-5 +/- 1 (SE) mm Hg - p less than 0.05), chlorthalidone 50 mg once daily (-7 +/- 1 mm Hg - p less than 0.01) and chlorothiazide 500 mg twice daily (-4 +/- 1 mm Hg - p less than 0.05). Blood pressure reductions with chlorothiazide 500 mg once daily and 1000 mg once daily were not significant. About half of the patients completing the trial could be described as "non-responders". The observed biochemical changes (reduced plasma potassium and chloride concentrations and increased plasma bicarbonate and urate concentrations) were most marked in the phases with the most prominent blood pressure effects. The result support the suggestion that a sustained diuretic effect is desirable when diuretics are used in the treatment of hypertension. This can be obtained by selection of the appropriate dosage regimen for a particular diuretic, such as once daily administration for "long-acting" and twice daily for "short-acting" thiazide-type diuretics.

Adult↗

The "well tempered" diuretic renogram: a standard method to examine the asymptomatic neonate with hydronephrosis or hydroureteronephrosis. A report from combined meetings of The Society for Fetal Urology and members of The Pediatric Nuclear Medicine Council--The Society of Nuclear Medicine.

Perinatal hydronephrosis (HN) and hydroureteronephrosis (HUN) are recognized more frequently as the routine use of prenatal ultrasonography increases. The decision-making process for those instances of urinary tract dilatation that require surgical correction and those that do not is based in part on the findings of diuresis renography. The methodology for performing this test has differed among nuclear medicine practitioners and the surgical findings are occasionally discrepant from the diuretic renogram interpretation. Consequently, the Society of Fetal Urology (SFU) and the Pediatric Nuclear Medicine Council (PNMC) of the Society of Nuclear Medicine met to develop by consensus a more uniform methodology. A standard method has been agreed upon for the following facets of diuretic renography: patient preparation (hydration and bladder catheterization), diuresis renography technique (radiopharmaceutical used, patient position during examination, data acquisition parameters, diuretic pharmaceutical and dosage, time of injection and regions of interest to monitor diuretic effect), and data analysis (percent differential renal function, curve pattern analysis and methods of measuring diuretic response). Pooled diuresis renogram data are being collected for analysis for correlation with surgical results and clinical outcomes to determine the most appropriate information to be derived from the diuretic renogram in neonates with HN and HUN.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗

Can renal doppler sonography replace diuretic radionuclide renography in infants with hydronephrosis?

Reliable differentiation between obstructive and non-obstructive hydronephrosis is decisive for the further therapeutic management in infants. The results of renal Doppler sonography were compared with diuretic radionuclide renography and with the follow-up results in 33 patients (range: 21 to 98 days). In Doppler sonography, a resistive index (RI) of > 0.9 was considered to be abnormal in the sense of an obstruction. In diuretic renography, a T1/2 value (time until a 50% decrease in activity in the kidneys was observed after injection of furosemide) of >20 min was appraised as obstructive hydronephrosis. In six patients an obstructive (T1/2 >20 min) and in 27 patients a non-obstructive (T1/2 <20 min) hydronephrosis was found. All patients with obstruction in diuretic renography showed an abnormal RI (>0.9) in Doppler sonography. In addition, all patients with surgery and obstruction in diuretic radionuclide renography showed an improvement in hydronephrosis. However, seven patients had a false-positive result in Doppler sonography. All patients with non-obstruction in diuretic radionuclide renography showed no worsening of hydronephrosis without surgery in the follow-up. We found a RI of 0.84 +/- 0.07 in the non-obstructive group and of 0.96 +/- 0.05 (p = 0.018) in the obstructive group. Doppler sonography showed discrepant results compared to diuretic radionuclide renography and therefore cannot replace this method.

Female↗

Randomized comparative study of efficacy of furosemide versus spironolactone in nonazotemic cirrhosis with ascites. Relationship between the diuretic response and the activity of the renin-aldosterone system.

Loop and distal diuretics are the basic drugs for the treatment of ascites. Although pharmacologic studies indicate that the natriuretic potency of loop diuretics is much greater than that of distal diuretics, there are no studies comparing the efficacy of these drugs in cirrhosis. Forty nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites and avid sodium retention were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 contained 21 patients treated with furosemide; group 2 contained 19 patients treated with spironolactone. The initial doses were 80 and 150 mg/day, respectively. These doses were increased to 160 and 300 mg/day, respectively, if there was no response. Cases not responding to furosemide and spironolactone were later treated with spironolactone and furosemide, respectively. In group 1, 11 of the 21 patients responded to furosemide, while in group 2, 18 of the 19 patients responded to spironolactone (p less than 0.01). Of the 10 patients in group 1 not responding to furosemide, 9 responded later to spironolactone. The diuretic response to furosemide and spironolactone was related to the activity of the renin-aldosterone system. Patients with higher renin and aldosterone did not respond to furosemide and required 300 mg/day of spironolactone to achieve a diuretic response. These results indicate that (a) at the dosages used in the study, spironolactone is more effective than furosemide in nonazotemic cirrhosis with ascites, and (b) the activity of the renin-aldosterone system influences the diuretic response to furosemide and spironolactone in these patients.

Ascites↗

Expression cloning of an insect diuretic hormone receptor. A member of the calcitonin/secretin receptor family.

Insect diuretic hormones and their receptors regulate fluid and ion secretion and thus are attractive targets for the design of novel insect control agents. A complementary DNA clone encoding a corticotropin-releasing factor-related diuretic hormone receptor from the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta was isolated by expression cloning in COS-7 cells. The receptor consists of 395 amino acids and contains seven putative transmembrane domains. The expressed receptor binds M. sexta diuretic hormone, as well as several related insect diuretic peptides with high affinity. Furthermore, each of these peptides stimulate adenylate cyclase in COS-7 cells transfected with the receptor. The M. sexta diuretic hormone receptor is homologous to the receptors for calcitonin, secretin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, parathyroid hormone, glucagon-like peptide 1, growth hormone-releasing hormone, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, and glucagon. The M. sexta diuretic hormone receptor is the first nonmammalian member of this family to be identified.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Diuretics. Use and misuse.

It is apparent that the large number of diuretics available today enables the clinician to mobilize edema fluid from patients with heart failure or other fluid retention states, to control blood pressure effectively in many patients with hypertension, and to manage many nonedematous states more successfully. The potency of some of these agents and their varied effects on renal tubular transport necessitate a cautious approach based on an understanding of their mechanisms of action. By selectively choosing different diuretics or diuretic combinations, the clinician can achieve the desired diuretic effect and prevent many of the electrolyte and acid-base derangements that accompany diuretic therapy. Selectivity of usage based on knowledge of the practical clinical pharmacology of these agents will also minimize the occurrence of side effects and avoid undesirable drug interactions.

Benzothiadiazines↗

Diuretics: mechanism of action and clinical application.

Despite the bewildering number of diuretics available to the physician, these drugs can be divided into 4 main groups, characterised by their site of action on sodium reabsorption in the kidney. Drugs acting on the ascending limb of the loop of Henle have a powerful but short acting diuretic effect; they include frusemide, ethacrynic acid and bumetanide. The benzothiadiazines and related compounds have a moderate diuretic action spread over a longer period, whilst the potassium-sparing diuretics, triamterene, amiloride and spironolactone, have only a weak diuretic effect but a marked ability to diminish urinary potassium excretion. The fourth group is made up of miscellaneous substances which function as vasodilator or osmotic agents. The pathogenesis of oedema formation in heart failure is outlined and a logical approach to treatment suggested. Duiretics are being increasingly used in the treatment of non-oedematous states, in particular hypertension, diabetes insipidus and hypercalciuria; their exact role in pregnancy and acute renal failure remains controversial. Side-effects can be related to their effect on electrolyte excretion and include hypokalaemia, hyponatraemia, hyperkalaemia and hyperuricaemia. The incidence of disturbed carbohydrate tolerance in previously normal individuals is low. Other less common side-effects are also discussed.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

[Effect of osmotic diuretics and saluretics on intracranial pressure in posttraumatic brain edema].

The effect of osmotic diuretics (mannite and glimarite, 29 studies), colloid-osmotic diuretic (algurin, 22 studies), and saluretic (lasix, 58 studies) on intracranial pressure (ICP) was studied in 30 patients in the acute period of severe craniocerebral injury. It was found that the hypotensive effect of the diuretics depended on the state of the water-electrolyte homeostasis, the time of medication with the agents, the severity of the patient's condition, and the initial ICP. The effect of osmotic diuretics was highest in normoosmia and normonatriemia in ICP of 20-45 mm Hg. Medication with osmotic diuretics and algurin in the first 2-3 days after the injury as usually attended by the "yield phenomenon"; the hypotensive effect of algurin in this period was less manifest. The effect of lasix was higher in hyperosmia caused by hypernatriemia but lower in patients who were in a terminal and extremely severe state.

Brain Edema↗

Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics in congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Loop diuretics, when given as intermittent bolus injections in acutely decompensated heart failure, may cause fluctuations in intravascular volume, increased toxicity and development of tolerance. Continuous infusion has been proposed to avoid these complications and result in greater diuresis, hopefully leading to faster symptom resolution, decrease in morbidity and possibly, mortality. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects and adverse effects of continuous intravenous infusion of loop diuretics with those of bolus intravenous administration among patients with congestive heart failure Class III-IV. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to 2003), EMBASE (1980 to 2003) and the HERDIN database. We also contacted pharmaceutical companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of continuous intravenous infusion versus bolus intravenous administration of loop diuretics in congestive heart failure were included DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility, methodological quality and did data extraction. Included studies were assessed for validity. Authors were contacted when feasible. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials. MAIN RESULTS: Eight trials involving 254 patients were included. In seven studies which reported on urine output, the output (as measured in cc/24 hours) was noted to be greater in patients given continuous infusion with a weighted mean difference (WMD) of 271 cc/24 hour (95%CI 93.1 to 449; p<0.01). Electrolyte disturbances (hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia) were not significantly different in the two treatment groups with a relative risk (RR) of 1.47 (95%CI 0.52 to 4.15; p=0.5). Less adverse effects (tinnitus and hearing loss) were noted when continuous infusion was given, RR 0.06 (95%CI 0.01 to 0.44; p=0.005). Based on a single study, the duration of hospital stay was significantly shortened by 3.1days with continuous infusion WMD -3.1 (95%CI -4.06 to -2.20; p<0.0001) while cardiac mortality was not significantly different in the two treatment groups, RR 0.47 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.69; p<0.0001). Based on two studies, all cause mortality was not significantly different in the two treatment groups, RR 0.52 (95%CI 0.38 to 0.71; p<0.0001). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Currently available data are insufficient to confidently assess the merits of the two methods of giving intravenous diuretics. Based on small and relatively heterogenous studies, this review showed greater diuresis and a better safety profile when loop diuretics were given as continuous infusion. The existing data still does not allow definitive recommendations for clinical practice and larger studies should be done to more adequately settle this issue.

Diuretics↗

Risk of kidney cancer among patients using analgesics and diuretics: a population-based cohort study.

The aim of this study was to determine the risk of kidney cancer in 2 cohorts defined on the basis of hospital discharge diagnoses associated with analgesic or diuretic use during the period 1965 to 1983. Patients were followed up through 1984 for cancer incidence. After excluding cancers in the first year of observation, 161 kidney cancers were observed vs. 138 expected among 54,662 patients in the analgesics cohort. The relative risk was higher for women than for men. When examined by sub-site within the kidney, risk for cancer of the renal pelvis was similar in magnitude to that for the renal parenchyma. Among 115,616 patients in the diuretics cohort, 278 kidney cancers occurred vs. 209 expected. The risk for women was higher than for men. This elevation in risk was confined to cancer of the renal parenchyma, with no significantly increased risk seen for cancer of the renal pelvis. Although we observed little excess risk among members of the analgesics cohort, the significantly elevated risk among patients using diuretics supports a number of recent studies, but inability to adjust for confounding factors such as obesity preclude drawing any conclusion regarding diuretics. Further research is warranted to assess in detail the relationship between diuretic use and cancer of the renal parenchyma.

Aged↗

A randomized, placebo-controlled study of loop diuretics in patients with essential hypertension: the bumetanide and furosemide on lipid profile (BUFUL) clinical study report.

This study was conducted to determine whether loop diuretics are more effective than placebo in reducing blood pressure without raising serum lipid levels, and whether bumetanide is more effective than furosemide in this respect. In a double-blind, 24-week placebo-controlled crossover study, 27 patients with essential hypertension were treated in four periods of 6 weeks each, including placebo twice, furosemide 40 mg daily, and bumetanide 1 mg daily. Several metabolic parameters, including serum lipid levels, and blood pressure were assessed. Overall levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were 5%, 12.4%, and 4.8% higher, respectively, during loop diuretic therapy than during placebo treatment. Overall systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements were 12 mmHg and 4 mmHg lower, respectively, during loop diuretic therapy than during placebo treatment. Any added effect of bumetanide on serum lipid levels and blood pressure compared with furosemide, however, could not be confirmed. Our results indicate that the loop diuretics bumetanide and furosemide are effective in reducing blood pressure, and influence serum lipid levels markedly less than do thiazide diuretics or chlorthalidone. In addition, these results indicate that differences in blood pressure reduction and serum lipid levels between the two compounds were small and nonsignificant.

Adult↗

Indirect laser-induced fluorescence detection of diuretics separated by capillary electrophoresis.

Indirect LIF detection was applied to the detection of four acidic diuretics separated by CZE. Semiconductor laser was employed to provide the stable excitation of 473 nm. With an optimized electrophoretic buffer system which contained 5 mM of triethylamine, 0.1 microM of fluorescein, and 5% of n-butanol, fast separation of four diuretics (ethacrynic acid, chlorthalidone, bendroflumethiazide, and bumetanide) can be performed within 3 min with the detection limits of 0.2-2 microg/mL. The impacts of buffer components including the concentrations of the electrolytes, fluorescence probe, and the organic additives were demonstrated. The method was applied for the detection of diuretics in urine. As an alternative way for the fast analysis of diuretics, this indirect detection method provided the technical support for future microchip performances, in which diuretics may be detected in the microchip by the common LIF detector without derivatization.

Buffers↗

Effects of a new diuretic piretanide on glucose tolerance, insulin secretion and 125I-insulin binding.

The effect of a new diuretic, piretanide, on glucose tolerance, insulin secretion and 125I-insulin binding to erythrocytes was studied in 12 male patients with mild essential hypertension. After a 4 week wash-out period with placebo, piretanide 6 mg b.i.d. was administered in a single-blind manner for 8 consecutive weeks. Although glucose tolerance deteriorated slightly in one patient, the diuretic treatment had no effect on the mean blood glucose concentrations during oral glucose tolerance tests or on glycohaemoglobin A1 measurements, both studies being done at 4 week intervals. Preservation of euglycemia was associated with increased insulin secretion. After 8 weeks of piretanide therapy the basal C-peptide concentration was 61% higher than the pretreatment level (0.44 vs 0.71 microU/ml; p less than 0.05). Glucagon - stimulated C-peptide concentrations were significantly elevated after 4 (1.67 vs 2.53 microU/ml, p less than 0.05) and after 8 weeks (1.67 vs. 2.90 microU/ml, p less than 0.01) of diuretic treatment. Fasting plasma immunoreactive insulin (IRI) levels were virtually unchanged by the drug therapy. The enhanced insulin secretion did not appear secondary to increased insulin resistance at the insulin receptor level, since the specific bound fraction of 125I-insulin remained unaffected by diuretic treatment. Although short-term loop diuretic treatment appears to have no effect on glucose tolerance, the very low density lipoprotein synthetic rate may be promoted by the increased insulin secretion.

Adult↗