Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Acetabulum”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29Linked to original sources

Intraoperative fractures of the acetabulum during primary total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The intraoperative occurrence of an acetabular fracture is a rare complication of primary total hip arthroplasty. Previous reports have lacked a sufficiently large number of subjects to allow for an analysis of the causes and appropriate treatment of this problem. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2000, 7121 primary total hip arthroplasties were performed at our institution. We retrospectively reviewed the records in our Total Joint Registry and found that twenty-one patients (twenty-one hips) had sustained an intraoperative acetabular fracture. Nineteen of these patients (nineteen hips) had been followed until revision or for a minimum of two years (mean duration of follow-up, forty-four months). We evaluated the anatomic location, cause, treatment, and outcome of the fractures. Acetabular component designs were categorized as modular, nonmodular (monoblock), true hemispherical, or elliptical, and then each design was analyzed for fracture risk. RESULTS: No fractures occurred in association with cemented acetabular components. The fracture rate associated with uncemented components was 0.4%. In seventeen hips, the acetabular component was judged to be stable despite the detection of a fracture and the cup was retained. In four hips, the original cup was not stable and therefore was replaced with a design that allowed for supplemental screw fixation. All fractures united, and all cups demonstrated osseous ingrowth at the time of the most recent follow-up. Elliptical monoblock cups were associated with a significantly higher fracture rate than were elliptical modular cups (p < 0.0001) and hemispherical modular cups (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between elliptical modular and hemispherical modular components with regard to the fracture rate. CONCLUSIONS: Acetabular fracture during primary total hip arthroplasty is a rare complication of acetabular fixation without cement. In the present series, retention of a stable cup was associated with uneventful osseous ingrowth and excellent early-term outcomes. We found a high rate of fracture in association with the use of monoblock elliptical components. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Acetabulum↗

Occult central fractures of the acetabulum.

Four cases of occult central acetabular fractures are presented. The oblique plane of the fracture line and the lack of displacement of the fracture fragments made the fractures difficult of impossible to visualize in the anteroposterior projection. The posterior oblique projection placed the fracture line perpendicular to the x-ray beam and, therefore, evident on the resultant roentgenogram. In the 3 cases in which this view was obtained, the fracture was disclosed. In the fourth case the fracture was demonstrated by tomography. In order to improve the roentgenographic assessment of pelvic trauma, consideration should be given to obtaining posterior oblique views of the pelvis as a matter of routine.

Acetabulum↗

Radiographic parameters of acetabulum for dysplasia in Korean adults.

We analyzed plain radiographs of 591 normal adult hips of various parameters to evaluate the radiological characteristics of the hip joint including the center-edge (CE) angle, acetabular angle, acetabular depth, acetabular roof obliquity and roof angle, and also to verify the rate of acetabular dysplasia. The CE angle was negatively correlated with acetabular angle and acetabular obliquity, but it was positively correlated with acetabular depth and roof angle. The rate of acetabular dysplasia (CE angle < 20 degrees) was 1.8%. We concluded that the CE angle and acetabular angle are more useful parameters for the diagnosis of acetabular dysplasia because there was no significant difference with advancing age and gender, as well as relatively small standard deviations.

Acetabulum↗