Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “fear conditioning”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Memory consolidation of auditory pavlovian fear conditioning requires protein synthesis and protein kinase A in the amygdala.

Previous studies have shown that long-term potentiation (LTP) can be induced in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala (LA) after stimulation of central auditory pathways and that auditory fear conditioning modifies neural activity in the LA in a manner similar to LTP. The present experiments examined whether intra-LA administration of inhibitors of protein synthesis or protein kinase A (PKA) activity, treatments that block LTP in hippocampus, interfere with memory consolidation of fear conditioning. In the first series of experiments, rats received a single conditioning trial followed immediately by intra-LA infusions of anisomycin (a protein synthesis inhibitor) or Rp-cAMPS (an inhibitor of PKA activity) and were tested 24 hr later. Results indicated that immediate post-training infusion of either drug dose-dependently impaired fear memory retention, whereas infusions 6 hr after conditioning had no effect. Additional experiments showed that anisomycin and Rp-cAMPS interfered with long-term memory (LTM), but not short-term memory (STM), of fear and that the effect on LTM was specific to memory consolidation processes rather than to deficits in sensory or performance processes. Findings suggest that the LA is essential for memory consolidation of auditory fear conditioning and that this process is PKA and protein-synthesis dependent.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2005

Facilitation of conditioned fear extinction by d-cycloserine is mediated by mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase cascades and requires de novo protein synthesis in basolateral nucleus of amygdala.

Recent results showed that either systemic or intra-amygdala administration of d-cycloserine, a partial agonist at the glycine modulatory site on the glutamate N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor facilitates the extinction of conditioned fear. Here we evaluated the role of mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in the basolateral nucleus of amygdala on the effect of d-cycloserine. The facilitation effect of d-cycloserine on fear extinction and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation was completely blocked by intra-amygdala administration of mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor PD98059 (500 ng/side, bilaterally) or U0-126 (20 microM/side, bilaterally). Furthermore, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor (wortmannin, 5.0 microg/side, bilaterally) infused into the basolateral nucleus of amygdala significantly reduced both facilitation effect of d-cycloserine and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation. Intra-amygdala administration of a transcription inhibitor (actinomycin D, 10 microg dissolved in 1.6 microl vehicle; 0.8 microl per side) and a translation inhibitor (anisomycin, 125 microg dissolved in 1.6 microl vehicle; 0.8 microl per side) completely blocked the facilitation effect of d-cycloserine. Control experiments indicated the blockage by actinomycin D or anisomycin were not due to lasting damage to the basolateral nucleus of amygdala or state dependency. In addition, none of the active drugs used here altered the expression of conditioned fear. These results suggested that phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent signaling cascades and new protein synthesis within the basolateral nucleus of amygdala played important roles in the d-cycloserine facilitation of the extinction of conditioned fear.

Amygdala↗
PubMed2001

Influence of fear conditioning on elicited ponto-geniculo-occipital waves and rapid eye movement sleep.

The amygdala plays a central role in fear conditioning, a model of anticipatory anxiety. It has massive projections to brainstem regions involved in rapid eye movement sleep (REM) and ponto-geniculo-occipital (PGO) wave generation. PGO waves occur spontaneously in REM or in response to stimuli. Electrical stimulation of the central nucleus of the amygdala enhances spontaneous PGO wave activity during REM and the amplitude of both the acoustic startle response and the elicited PGO wave (PGOE), a neural marker of alerting. This study examined the effects of fear conditioning on REM and on PGOE. On conditioning days, the number of REM episodes, the average REM duration and the REM percentage were decreased while REM latency was increased. The presentation of auditory stimuli in the presence of a light conditioned stimulus produced PGOE of greater amplitudes. The results suggest that fear, most likely involving the amygdala, can influence REM and brainstem alerting mechanisms.

Amygdala↗
PubMed2006

Effect of co-administration of subchronic lithium pretreatment and acute MAO inhibitors on extracellular monoamine levels and the expression of contextual conditioned fear in rats.

We investigated the effects of clorgyline [a selective MAO (monoamine oxidase inhibitor)-A inhibitor] and lazabemide (a selective MAO-B inhibitor) on extracellular serotonin, dopamine and noradrenaline concentrations in the medial prefrontal cortex after 1-week treatment with subchronic 0.2% or 0.05% Li2CO3 (p.o.) and the effects on expression of contextual conditioned fear, previously reported to be reduced by facilitation of serotonin neurotransmission. As compared to normal diet controls, the subchronic 0.2% Li2CO3 group showed significantly higher levels of extracellular serotonin, but not noradrenaline. No changes were observed in the 0.05% Li2CO3 group. Acute clorgyline (10 mg/kg) treatments combined with subchronic 0.2% Li2CO3 treatments showed significant increases in extracellular serotonin concentrations, but not in dopamine or noradrenaline, as compared with clorgyline treatment alone. There was an additive effect with combined treatment of subchronic 0.2% Li2CO3 and acute clorgyline on the reduction of conditioned freezing, an index of conditioned fear, and this was not observed with subchronic 0.05% Li2CO3. These behavioral data indicate the functional significance of increased extracellular serotonin concentrations due to combined use of a MAO-A inhibitor with subchronic lithium. Effects of lazabemide (10 mg/kg) on extracellular monoamine concentrations and conditioned fear were slight or negligible, and were not affected by subchronic lithium treatment. The present study suggests that lithium augmentation of the antidepressant effect of MAO inhibitors is mediated by additional increases in the extracellular serotonin concentrations induced by MAO-A inhibition and suggests that the anxiolytic action of MAO inhibitors may be enhanced by lithium.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Acceleration of visually cued conditioned fear through the auditory pathway.

Defensive responses elicited by sensory experiences are critical for survival. Mice acquire a conditioned fear response rapidly to an auditory cue but slowly to a visual cue, a difference in learned behavior that is likely to be mediated by direct projections to the lateral amygdala from the auditory thalamus but mainly indirect ones from the visual thalamus. Here, we show that acquisition of visually cued conditioned fear is accelerated in 'rewired' mice that have retinal projections routed to the auditory thalamus. Visual stimuli induce expression of the immediate early gene Fos (also known as c-fos) in the auditory thalamus and the lateral amygdala in rewired mice, similar to the way auditory stimuli do in control mice. Thus, the rewired auditory pathway conveys visual information and mediates rapid activity-dependent plasticity in central structures that influence learned behavior.

Amygdala↗
PubMed2001

Effects of chronic stress on contextual fear conditioning and the hippocampal expression of the neural cell adhesion molecule, its polysialylation, and L1.

Chronic stress has been shown to induce time-dependent neurodegeneration in the hippocampus, ranging from a reversible damage to a permanent neuronal loss. This damage has been proposed to impair cognitive function in hippocampus-dependent learning tasks. In this study, we have used a 21-day restraint stress procedure in rats, previously reported to induce reversible atrophy of apical dendrites of CA3 pyramidal cells, to assess whether it may influence subsequent performance in the contextual fear conditioning task under experimental conditions involving high stress levels (1 mA shock intensity as the unconditioned stimulus). In addition, we were interested in the study of the possible cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the reversible phase of neural damage. Cell adhesion molecules of the immunoglobulin superfamily, such as the neural cell adhesion molecule and L1, are cell-surface macromolecules that, through their recognition and adhesion properties, regulate cell-cell interactions and have been reported to play a key role in cognitive functioning. A second aim of this study was to evaluate whether chronic stress would modulate the expression of the neural cell adhesion molecule, its polysialylation, and L1 in the hippocampus. The results showed that chronic stress facilitated subsequent contextual fear conditioning. They also showed that chronically stressed rats displayed reduced hippocampal neural cell adhesion molecule, but increased polysialylated expression as well as a trend towards exhibiting increased L1 expression. In summary, these results support the view that a 21-day chronic stress regimen predisposes individuals to develop enhanced contextual fear conditioning responses. They also indicate that cell adhesion molecules might play a role in the structural remodelling that occurs in the hippocampus as a consequence of chronic stress exposure.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Impaired fear conditioning following unilateral temporal lobectomy in humans.

Classical fear conditioning was used in the present study as a model for investigating emotional learning and memory in human subjects with lesions to the medial temporal lobe. Animal studies have revealed a critical role for medial temporal lobe structures, particularly the amygdala, in simple and complex associative emotional responding. Whether these structures perform similar functions in humans is unknown. On both simple and conditional discrimination tasks, unilateral temporal lobectomy subjects showed impaired conditioned response acquisition relative to control subjects. This impairment could not be accounted for by deficits in nonassociative sensory or autonomic performance factors, or by differences in declarative memory for the experimental parameters. These results show that temporal lobe structures in humans, as in other mammals, are important components in an emotional memory network.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Regulation of hippocampal cell adhesion molecules NCAM and L1 by contextual fear conditioning is dependent upon time and stressor intensity.

Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) of the immunoglobulin superfamily, NCAM and L1, as well as the post-translational addition of alpha-2, 8-linked polysialic acid (PSA) homopolymers to NCAM (PSA-NCAM), have been implicated in the neural mechanisms underlying memory formation. Given that the degree of stress elicited by the training situation is one of the key factors that influence consolidation processes, this study questioned whether training rats under different stressor intensities (0.2, 0.4, or 1 mA shock intensity) in a contextual fear conditioning task might regulate subsequent expression of NCAM, PSA-NCAM and L1 in the hippocampus, as evaluated immediately after testing rats for conditioning at 12 and 24 h after training. Behavioural inhibition (evaluated as a 'freezing' index) at testing and post-testing plasma corticosterone levels were also assessed. The results showed that 12 h post-training, conditioned animals displayed reduced NCAM, but increased L1, expression. At this time point, the group trained at the highest shock intensity (1 mA) also presented decreased PSA-NCAM expression. Analyses performed 24 h post-training indicated that the 1 mA group exhibited increased NCAM and L1 expression, but decreased expression of PSA-NCAM levels. In addition, L1 values that presented a shock intensity-dependent U-shaped pattern were also increased in the group trained at the lowest shock condition (0.2 mA) and remained unchanged in the intermediate shock condition (0.4 mA). Freezing and corticosterone values at both testing times were positively related with shock intensity experienced at training. Therefore, our results show a complex regulation of CAMs of the immunoglobulin superfamily in the hippocampus that depends upon stressor intensity and time factors. In addition, the pattern of CAMs expression found in the 1 mA group (which is the one that shows higher post-training corticosterone levels and develops the stronger and longer-lasting levels of fear conditioning) supports the view that, after a first phase of synaptic de-adherence during consolidation, NCAM and L1 might participate in the stabilization of selected synapses underlying the establishment of long-term memory for contextual fear conditioning, and suggests that glucocorticoids might play a role in the observed regulation of CAMs.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Reconsolidation and extinction of conditioned fear: inhibition and potentiation.

NMDA receptors are important for the acquisition, reconsolidation, and extinction of memories. NMDA receptor antagonists impair these memory processes, whereas the partial agonist D-cycloserine (DCS) potentiates both learning and extinction. Here, we used DCS and the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-SH-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine maleate (MK-801) to investigate the effects of enhancing and blocking NMDA receptor-mediated glutamatergic transmission on the reconsolidation and extinction of a conditioned fear memory. Either long extinction training or short memory reactivation sessions were used to preferentially engage extinction and reconsolidation processes, respectively. MK-801 blocked extinction to maintain high levels of conditioned freezing, and DCS potentiated extinction to reduce freezing, when they were administered before a long extinction training session. However, the opposite behavioral outcome was observed when the brief memory reactivation session was used: MK-801 administration impaired, whereas DCS increased, freezing, likely reflecting impairment and enhancement of reconsolidation, respectively. Finally, by using localized intracerebral infusions, we showed that the basolateral amygdala is a primary locus of action of systemically administered DCS. Thus, intrabasolateral amygdala DCS potentiated both the extinction and the reconsolidation of fear conditioning, depending on the length of the extinction/memory reactivation session. Therefore, memory reconsolidation can be both disrupted and enhanced, and extinction can be both potentiated and impaired, either to reduce or increase conditioned fear. These results have important implications for the use of reconsolidation blockade and potentiation of extinction as treatment strategies for maladaptive memory disorders.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1999

Ibotenate lesions of the hippocampus impair spatial learning but not contextual fear conditioning in mice.

Recently, gene targeting and other mouse transgenic techniques have been used to study the cellular mechanisms underlying learning and memory mechanisms in the hippocampus. A key assumption of many of these studies is that lesions of the hippocampus have a similar impact on learning and memory in mice and in rats. Here, we used axon-sparing ibotenate lesions to determine whether damage to the hippocampus disrupts spatial learning and contextual conditioning in mice, as it is known to do in rats. Our results demonstrated that hippocampal lesions impair performance in the hidden-platform version of the water maze under a variety of experimental conditions. Neither keeping the start site constant, nor prior training with the visible-platform task fully rescued the spatial learning deficits of the lesioned mice. As previously shown in rats, the lesions left the performance of the mice intact in the visible-platform version of the water maze, indicating that they do not affect all types of learning, and that disruptions of sensory processing or motivation probably did not account for their deficits in the hidden-platform task. In contrast, the very same lesions did not affect either cued or contextual fear conditioning. These results confirm the involvement of the hippocampus in spatial learning in mice, and they also demonstrate that hippocampal-lesioned mice can show contextual fear conditioning. Thus, the behavioral findings presented here are crucial for the interpretation of transgenic experiments with the widely used water maze and fear-conditioning paradigms.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Impaired escape performance and enhanced conditioned fear in rats following exposure to an uncontrollable stressor are mediated by glutamate and nitric oxide in the dorsal raphe nucleus.

Exposure to uncontrollable aversive events produces a variety of behavioral consequences that do not occur if the aversive event is controllable. Accumulating evidence suggests that exaggerated excitation of serotonin (5-HT) neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) is sufficient to cause these same behaviors, such as poor shuttlebox escape performance and enhanced conditioned fear that occur 24 h after exposure to inescapable tailshock (IS). The aim of the present studies was to explore the possibility that N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation and nitric oxide (NO) formation within the DRN might be involved in mediating the behavioral consequences of IS. To this end, either the NMDA receptor antagonist 2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (APV) or the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor Nw-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), was microinjected into the DRN before IS or before testing 24 h later. Blocking NMDA receptors with APV in the DRN during IS prevented the usual impact of IS on escape responding and conditioned fear. However, injection of APV at the time of testing only reduced these effects. The DRN was shown to be the critical site mediating blockade of these behavioral changes since injection of APV lateral to the DRN did not alter the behavioral consequences of IS. Conversely, L-NAME was most effective in reversing the effects of IS when administered at the time of testing. These results suggest that there is glutamatergic input to the DRN at the time of IS that produces long-lasting changes in DRN sensitivity. This plasticity in the DRN is discussed as a possible mechanism by which IS leads to changes in escape performance and conditioned fear responding.

2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate↗
PubMed2006

Opioid receptors in the midbrain periaqueductal gray regulate prediction errors during pavlovian fear conditioning.

The authors used a within-subject blocking design to study the role of ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (v1PAG) opioid receptors in regulating prediction errors during Pavlovian fear conditioning. In Stage I, the authors trained rats to fear conditioned stimulus (CS) A by pairing it with shock. In Stage II, CSA and CSB were co-presented and followed with shock. Two novel stimuli, CSC and CSD, were also co-presented and followed with shock in Stage II. CSA blocked fear from accruing to CSB. Blocking was prevented by systemic pretreatment with naloxone. Blocking was also prevented in a dose-dependent and neuroanatomically specific fashion by vlPAG infusions of the micro-opioid receptor antagonist CTAP. These experiments show that v1PAG micro-opioid receptors contribute to Pavlovian fear learning by regulating predictive error.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Functional MRI of human Pavlovian fear conditioning: patterns of activation as a function of learning.

fMRI was used to study human brain activity during Pavlovian fear conditioning. Subjects were exposed to lights that either signaled painful electrical stimulation (CS+), or that did not serve as a warning signal (CS-). Unique patterns of activation developed within anterior cingulate and visual cortices as learning progressed. Training with the CS+ increased active tissue volume and shifted the timing of peak fMRI signal toward CS onset within the anterior cingulate. Within the visual cortex, active tissue volume increased with repeated CS+ presentations, while cross-correlation between the functional time course and CS- presentations decreased. This study demonstrates plasticity of anterior cingulate and visual cortices as a function of learning, and implicates these regions as components of a functional circuit activated in human fear conditioning.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Distinct gene expression profiles in hippocampus and amygdala after fear conditioning.

It is well known that the hippocampus and amygdala are involved in the formations of fear conditioning memories, and both contextual and cued fear memory requires activation of the NMDA receptors. However, the global molecular responses in the hippocampus and amygdala have not been investigated. By applying high-density microarrays containing 11,000 genes and expressed sequence tags, we examined fear conditioning-induced gene expression profiles in these two brain regions at 0.5, 6, and 24 h. We found that 222 genes in the amygdala and 145 genes in the hippocampus showed dynamic changes in their expression levels. Surprisingly, the overall patterns of gene expression as well as the individual genes for the amygdala and hippocampus were drastically different and only small number of genes exhibited the similar regulation in both brain regions. Based on expression kinetics, the genes from the amygdala can be further grouped into eight unique clusters, whereas the genes from the hippocampus were placed into six clusters. Therefore, our study suggests that different genomic responses are initiated in the hippocampus and amygdala which are known to play distinct roles in fear memory formation.

Amygdala↗
PubMed1998

Differential modulation of changes in hippocampal-septal synaptic excitability by the amygdala as a function of either elemental or contextual fear conditioning in mice.

Recent data obtained using a classic fear conditioning paradigm showed a dissociation between the retention of associations relative to contextual information (dependent on the hippocampal formation) and the retention of elemental associations (dependent on the amygdala). Furthermore, it was reported that conditioned emotional responses (CERs) could be dissociated from the recollection of the learning experience (declarative memory) in humans and from modifications of the hippocampal-septal excitability in animals. Our aim was to determine whether these two systems ("behavioral expression" system and "factual memory" system) interact by examining the consequences of amygdalar lesions (1) on the modifications of hippocampal-septal excitability and (2) on the behavioral expression of fear (freezing) resulting from an aversive conditioning during reexposure to conditional stimuli (CSs). During conditioning, to modulate the predictive nature of the context and of a discrete stimulus (tone) on the unconditional stimulus (US) occurrence, the phasic discrete CS was paired with the US or randomly distributed with regard to the US. After the lesion, the CER was dramatically reduced during reexposure to the CSs, whatever the type of acquisition. However, the changes in hippocampal-septal excitability persisted but were altered. For controls, a decrease in septal excitability was observed during reexposure to the conditioning context only for the "unpaired group" (predictive context case). Conversely, among lesioned subjects this decrease was observed in the "paired group" (predictive discrete CS case), whereas this decrease was significantly reduced in the unpaired group with respect to the matched control group. The amplitude and the direction of these modifications suggest a differential modulation of hippocampal-septal excitability by the amygdala to amplify the contribution of the more predictive association signaling the occurrence of the aversive event.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1997

Assessment of learning by the Morris water task and fear conditioning in inbred mouse strains and F1 hybrids: implications of genetic background for single gene mutations and quantitative trait loci analyses.

Genetic methods including the creation of transgenic or null mutant models and mapping studies using quantitative trait loci strategies can be used to identify candidate genes in mice that regulate learning processes. Interpretations as to the impact of single gene mutations for polygenic behaviours like learning will depend in part on the genetic background of the animals used for these manipulations. To address the issue of genetic variability, 12 inbred strains and seven different F1 hybrids were tested on multiple behavioural tasks, including two complex learning paradigms: the Morris water task and fear conditioning. Strain differences were found for all variables measured. In the hidden platform version of the Morris task, the albino animals performed poorly while overall the F1 hybrids showed the best selectivity for the trained quadrant as measured in a probe trial. In contrast, almost all genotypes performed well on the contextual fear conditioning task and learned to associate the test context with the pairing of a foot shock and auditory stimulus as demonstrated 24 h after training by increased freezing in the test environment compared to an altered context. Significant genetic correlations were obtained for behavioural measures suggesting that the same genes regulate various aspects of performance on behavioural tasks. Scores from these multiple inbred strains and F1 hybrids provide a baseline level of learning ability for fear conditioning and the Morris water task. The results of the present study confirm the importance of genetic background in the performance of various learning tasks. This variability should be considered when developing new transgenic or null mutant animal models.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2001

Post-training injections of catecholaminergic drugs do not modulate fear conditioning in rats and mice.

Studies employing classical fear conditioning (FC) and inhibitory avoidance (IA), two procedurally different aversive tasks, provide different insight into the neuronal mechanism(s) underlying fear learning. We examined whether immediate post-training injections of catecholaminergic drugs modulate memory consolidation in one-trial FC, as has been demonstrated in one-trial IA. Neither epinephrine (0.1, 0.3, 1.0 mg/kg intraperitoneally) nor amphetamine (1.0, 2.0 mg/kg) modulates FC to tone or context, as indicated by freezing in rats. Similarly, epinephrine (0.1, 1.0 mg/kg) and beta-adrenergic antagonists (sotalol and propranolol; 2 mg/kg) also failed to modulate FC in mice. These results indicate that FC is not susceptible to memory modulation by catecholaminergic drugs in the manner described in IA tasks.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2002

Fear conditioning occludes LTP-induced presynaptic enhancement of synaptic transmission in the cortical pathway to the lateral amygdala.

Auditory information critical for fear conditioning, a model of emotional learning, is conveyed to the lateral nucleus of the amygdala via two routes: directly from the medial geniculate nucleus and indirectly from the auditory cortex. Here we show in the cortico-amygdala pathway that learned fear occludes electrically induced long-term potentiation (LTP). Quantal analysis of the expression of LTP in this pathway reveals a significant presynaptic component reflected in an increase in probability of transmitter release. Conditioned fear also is accompanied by the enhancement in transmitter release at this cortico-amygdala synapse. These results indicate that the synaptic projections from the auditory cortex to the lateral amygdala are modified during the acquisition and expression of fear to auditory stimulation, thus further strengthening the proposed link between LTP in the auditory pathways to the amygdala and learned fear.

Amygdala↗