Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Reliability”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28Linked to original sources

The Forensic Inpatient Observation Scale (FIOS): development, reliability and validity.

INTRODUCTION: Re-offending, as a measure of success in forensic psychiatry, gives no information about other behaviours that may have changed. The development of the Forensic Inpatient Observation Scale (FIOS), an observation instrument to assess the non-offending functioning of forensic patients, is described. STUDY 1: In the first study the development of the initial item pool of the FIOS is described. This resulted in an instrument consisting of 78 items and seven scales. The internal reliability of the scales ranged from 0.78 to 0.91. The inter-rater reliability of the scales varied from 0.50 to 0.85 and the test retest reliability over a period of three weeks was high for most scales, ranging from 0.74 to 0.89. STUDY 2: In the second study the FIOS was developed further in another sample of forensic patients. This time exploratory factor analysis with Varimax rotation and post hoc reliability analysis were applied to determine the factor structure among the items. This resulted in an item pool of 35 items, among which six factors could be distinguished that closely resemble the factor structure of the FIOS in study one: (1) self-care, (2) social behaviour, (3) oppositional behaviour, (4) insight offence/problems, (5) verbal skills and (6) distress. Most items have high loadings on the factor they are assigned; 29 items have a loading of 0.60 or higher. The internal consistency of the scales ranges from 0.73 to 0.91 and the scales appear to be measuring independent constructs. Twenty-five out of the 35 items have an inter-rater correspondence of 90% or higher and 30 out of 35 items have an inter-rater correspondence of 87.5% or higher. The inter-rater reliability on the scale level, however, was somewhat less satisfying with correlations ranging from 0.50 to 0.69. DISCUSSION: It is argued that training the observers on a more regular basis will improve the inter-rater reliability. There is some evidence for the convergent validity of the FIOS. The FIOS has some advantages over existing inpatient scales in that it is developed specifically for forensic patients, it does not particularly focus on axis 1 symptoms but includes oppositional behaviour and attitudes to offending.

Journal Article↗

The applicability and the inter-rater reliability of the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale in an elderly clinical population.

BACKGROUND: Psychopathological rating scales are developed and tested on a relatively young population. Their applicability and psychometric performance in the elderly (aged above 60-65 years) are mostly unknown. It is unknown how factors related to ageing or mild cognitive dysfunction influence the applicability and the reliability of these scales. We tested the applicability and the inter-rater reliability of the Dutch version of the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS) on an elderly (age > 60 years) inpatient population. METHODS: The applicability and reliability (expressed by differently weighted Kappa coefficients) of the CPRS was assessed by investigating 62 consecutively referred patients in a ward for elderly patients with acute psychiatric problems that were primarily functional in nature. The results are compared with those found in a younger population. RESULTS: The applicability and reliability of the CPRS on the elderly can be categorised as sufficient to good and is comparable with results for a younger population. We did not find any specific factors influencing the practicality, or the reliability of the CPRS when applied to an elderly group of people with a mild cognitive dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The CPRS does not loose its clinical relevance with age, as the applicability and the reliability of the CPRS is not influenced by ageing or mild cognitive dysfunction. The CPRS can detect a broad range of symptoms and due to its psychometric properties it is a useful instrument for measuring an elderly or young population.

Age Factors↗

The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) in patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease and normal subjects.

OBJECTIVES: The cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assesment Scale (ADAS-Cog) is the most widely used test in clinical trials dealing with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of ADAS-Cog. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with AD, fulfilling NINCDS-ADRDA criteria of probable AD, who were in stage 3-5 according to the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS), and 27 non-demented control subjects with similar age, gender and educational status were recruited for the study. The Turkish version of ADAS-Cog, Standardized Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) and Short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test (SOMCT) were applied to both of the groups. Inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, test-retest reliability; face validity, differential validity and convergent validity were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Both MMSE and ADAS-Cog have significantly differentiated patients with AD and control subjects (p < 0.001). A significant correlation was established between MMSE and ADAS-Cog scores in AD group (r: -0.739). ADAS-Cog was also highly significantly correlated with GDS (r: 0.720) and SOMCT (r: 0.738). For the group with AD, control and whole cohort coefficients of internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha: 0.800, 0.515, 0.873 were found respectively. Inter-rater reliability for total ADAS-Cog score was found as ICC: 0.99 and 0.98 and test-retest reliability was found as ICC: 0.91 and 0.95 for demented and nondemented subjects, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of ADAS-Cog has been found to be highly reliable and valid in differentiating patients with mild and moderate AD from nondemented subjects.

Aged↗

A population based study on the intra and inter-rater reliability of the clock drawing test in Brazil: the Bambuí Health and Ageing Study.

BACKGROUND: Reliability should be considered when selecting a scoring system since it influences validity. CDT reliability has rarely been assessed in population based studies and in developing countries. The aim of the present study was to determine intra and inter-rater reliabilities of the CDT scored by the Shulman (2000) method, in elderly with very low formal educational level from Brazil. METHODS: CDTs performed by a random sample of 202 subjects of a population-based cohort of elderly were scored on two occasions by the same rater and by two independent raters. Reliability was measured using the kappa statistic, weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Data were stratified according to gender, age and schooling level. RESULTS: Intra and inter-rater reliabilities were excellent when CDTs were classified as 'normal' (scores 4 or 5) or 'abnormal' (scores 0 to 3) (kappa = 0.99 and 0.94, respectively) and were in the good to excellent range when scored from 0 to 5 (kappa = 0.88 and 0.74, respectively). Difficulties in distinguishing between scores 4 and 5, and a low proportion of score 1 tests were found. CONCLUSIONS: The CDT scored by the Shulman (2000) method appears to have good to excellent reliability in an elderly population with very low formal educational level. However, difficulties in distinguishing between scores 4 and 5, and a low proportion of score 1 tests suggest these scores may not be totally adequate for this population. Further studies are necessary to determine the consistency of our results in similar populations.

Aged↗

Some indicators of socio-economic status may not be reliable and use of indices with these data could worsen equity.

Socio-economic status (SES) indices are increasingly being used to characterise (in)equity, with the assumption that SES indices are reliable. However, the accuracy of such SES indices is questionable if they are unreliable. We examined the inter-rater and test-retest reliability of a range of indicators commonly used to generate SES indices as well as the composite SES indices. Results from research in southeast Nigeria showed considerable variation, with some indicators having only low to moderate reliability (reliability coefficients 0.25-0.77). Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of SES indices was 0.63 in both cases. Many households were misclassified because of the unreliable SES indices. Analyses of the distribution of resources based on such indicators could lead to inaccuracies in benefit incidence estimates and policy decisions based on low to moderately reliable SES indicators could worsen equity in access to and use of resources. Greater rigour is needed in conceptualising as well as undertaking SES measurements.

Humans↗

Assessment of reliability in functional imaging studies.

PURPOSE: To investigate the reliability of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), an approach for mapping and quantifying reliably activated voxels was developed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, a SPM99 analysis was performed, and the resulting statistical maps were taken as the basis for subsequent analyses of reliability. Several approaches were demonstrated using 1). a voxel-wise intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); 2). an analysis of scatter plots, calculating the correlation of contrast t-values for pairs of activation maps; and 3). the ratio of overlapping volumes as suggested in the literature. The methods were applied to an fMRI study in which subjects were asked to vary their attentional effort during watching a flickering checkerboard pattern with varying letters in the center. The subjects had to ignore or attend to the presentation, or they had to detect a target letter within the checkerboard. RESULTS: The imaging data showed good reliability in terms of ICC for regions of visual processing, as well as for frontal areas, especially in the letter detection task. Furthermore, the size of reliable clusters depended on the presumed attentional effort of the subjects. CONCLUSION: Application of the method demonstrated that the activation due to visual stimulation could also be detected very consistently during a no-attend condition, but the reliability of the activations were best during the attended tasks.

Adult↗

Cervical dystonia severity scale reliability study.

Cervical dystonia (CD) is characterized by sustained contractions of the neck musculature, resulting in abnormal head postures. The Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale (CDSS) was developed to provide a reliable measure of treatment response in patients with CD. The CDSS uses a protractor and wall chart to rate the severity of the head's deviation from neutral in each of three planes of motion (rotation, laterocollis, anterocollis/retrocollis), which is then scored in 5 degree intervals (1 degree to 5 degrees deviation = 1; 86 degree to 90 degrees deviation = 18). To test the reliability of the CDSS, four centers, each with two independent examiners, evaluated 42 patients with CD. At each site, each of the two examiners used the CDSS to evaluate the head position of each patient twice, on the same day, for a total of four evaluations. The kappa value for intra-examiner agreement was 0.94 (95% confidence limit of 0.900-0.972), indicating excellent intra-examiner reliability. The kappa value for interexaminer reliability was 0.79 for the first evaluation and 0.86 for the second evaluation (95% confidence limits of 0.668-0.920 and 0.790-0.920) indicating excellent interexaminer reliability. Thus, the CDSS was highly reliable in both intra-examiner and interexaminer scoring comparisons.

Adult↗

Reliability estimation of grouped functional imaging data using penalized maximum likelihood.

We analyzed grouped fMRI data and developed a reliability analysis for such data using the method of penalized maximum likelihood (ML). Specifically, this technique was applied to a somatosensory paradigm that used a mechanical probe to provide noxious stimuli to the foot, and a paradigm consisting of four levels of graded peripheral neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). In each case, reliability maps of activation were generated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed in the case of the graded NMES paradigm for each level of stimulation, which revealed an increase in the specificity of activation with increasing stimulation levels. In addition, penalized ML was used to determine whether the grouped reliability maps obtained from one stimulus level were significantly different from those obtained at other levels. The results show a significant difference (P < 0.01) in the reliability of activation from one stimulation level to the next. These results are in agreement with those obtained using generalized linear modeling (GLM). While the reliability maps generated are not directly comparable, they are qualitatively similar to those obtained by controlling the expected false discovery rate (FDR). The proposed methodology can be used to objectively compare activation maps between groups, as well as to perform reliability assessments. Furthermore, this method potentially can be used to assess the longitudinal effect of treatment therapies within a group.

Analysis of Variance↗

Within-day reliability of temporal-spatial gait parameters associated with rheumatoid arthritic feet.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the GAITRite system can reliably measure temporal and spatial gait parameters in patients with rheumatoid arthritic feet. METHODS: Fifty patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis were each measured on two separate occasions on the same outpatient visit. Temporal and spatial gait parameter readings were recorded for each of three walks across the GAITRite mat. Intraclass correlations (2,1) in combination with within-subject standard deviation were used to quantify within-day reliability. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation, ranging from 0.75 to 0.87, demonstrated excellent within-day repeatability for walking speed, cadence, step length and stride length. Good reliability was reported with cycle time (0.74) and base of support (0.62). Within-subject standard deviation allows these to be used in a clinical setting. CONCLUSION: The within-day reliability of temporal and spatial gait parameters in rheumatoid arthritic patients has been demonstrated in the current study. However, further investigation of between-day reliability is necessary and would provide clinicians with reliable data in the objective assessment and any form of intervention in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Journal Article↗

Reliability of dynamometric measurements of the pelvic floor musculature.

AIMS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability of strength and endurance dynamometric measurements of the pelvic floor musculature (PFM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine female participants, primipara and multipara, aged between 27 and 42 and presenting different severity levels of stress urinary incontinence (SUI), participated in the study. They were evaluated using a new pelvic floor dynamometer, an instrumented speculum based on strain-gauged technology. Strength and endurance evaluations were repeated in three successive sessions, each followed by a 4-week period. Maximal strength values were recorded at three dynamometer openings (5 mm, 1 cm, and 1.5 cm between the two dynamometer branches). The maximal rate of force development (MRFD) and percentage of strength lost after 10 and 60 sec were computed from the endurance trial. The generalizability theory was applied to estimate the reliability of the PFM measurements. The reliability was quantified by the index of dependability and the corresponding standard error of measurement (SEM) for one and the mean of three trials performed in one session for the strength measurements and one trial completed in one session for the MRFD and endurance measurements. RESULTS: For the maximal strength measurements, the largest coefficient of dependability was obtained at the 1 cm opening, with a value of 0.88. The corresponding SEM reached 1.49 N. The reliability of the MRFD was also very good with a coefficient of 0.86 and an SEM of 0.056 N/sec. The reliability was minimally affected by the number of trials. The strength loss measurements at 10 and 60 sec were unreliable, with coefficient values of 0.38 and 0.10, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that the reliability of the strength parameters (maximal strength and MRTD measurements) was high enough for future investigations on pelvic floor rehabilitation programs.

Adult↗

Revisiting reliability of quantified perineal ultrasound: Bland and Altman analysis of a new protocol for the rectangular coordinate method.

AIMS: This study tested the reliability of a new protocol for the rectangular coordinate method of quantifying perineal ultrasound. METHODS: Representative scans of healthy primiparous females were quantified by positioning a pubic bone template, drawn onto an acetate sheet containing x-y axes, over scans, by aligning the x-axis with the pubic bone central axis. Values for x (D(x)) and y (D(y)) located the urethrovesical junction (UVJ) at Rest, and at maximal Valsalva and Kegel. Range of motion (V-K) was calculated. Bland and Altman analysis, correlations, and t-tests determined intra- and inter-rater reliability, and variance due to designation of the pubic bone central axis (template control). RESULTS: Correlations averaged 0.72, 0.70, and 0.92 for intra-rater, inter-rater, and template control experiments. D(x) Rest, D(x) Kegel, and V-K were reliable in all experiments. First and second measures for inter-rater D(y) Rest and D(y) Kegel, and template control D(y) Valsalva were significantly different. Bland and Altman analysis showed D(y) Rest, D(y) Kegel, and D(x) and D(y) Valsalva for both reliability experiments to have limits of agreement (LOA's) large enough to explain >or=50% of the actual value ranges. Template control LOA's explained <or=30% of the actual value ranges. CONCLUSIONS: The reliability of this protocol varied according to the conditions analyzed; accurate reliability assessment of all conditions required Bland and Altman analysis; and the designation of the pubic bone central axis remained a source of variance between investigators. Our results suggest Bland and Altman analysis be used with each study that quantifies perineal ultrasound.

Adult↗

Reliability of clinical balance outcome measures in the elderly.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Simple, practical and reliable clinical balance outcome measures are needed to assess baseline status and response to treatment in older people. The reliability of the clinical measures used in this testing protocol had not been determined for this population. This study assessed the inter-rater reliability of three commonly used clinical measures of balance: one leg standing, tandem gait and functional reach. METHOD: Two samples of older people were used: (1) non-disabled and (2) disabled community dwellers. All testing was performed in a single session by two trained examiners according to a standardized protocol. Intra-class correlations were calculated comparing the means of each clinical balance test for Examiner 1 with Examiner 2. RESULTS: Reliability coefficients were 0.75 for one leg standing, 0.73 for functional reach, and 0.31 for tandem gait for the non-disabled sample. Reliability coefficients were 0.85 for one leg standing, 0.79 for functional reach, and 0.62 for tandem gait for the disabled sample. CONCLUSIONS: These findings for the one leg standing and functional reach testing protocols in disabled and non-disabled older people can be used as outcome measures. Further study should be directed towards improving the reliability of the tandem gait test for use with older people.

Aged↗

Visual judgements of steadiness in one-legged stance: reliability and validity.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is a paucity of information about the validity and reliability of clinicians' visual judgements of steadiness in one-legged stance. Such judgements are used frequently in clinical practice to support decisions about treatment in the fields of neurology, sports medicine, paediatrics and orthopaedics. The aim of the present study was to address the validity and reliability of visual judgements of steadiness in one-legged stance in a group of physiotherapists. METHOD: A videotape of 20 five-second performances was shown to 14 physiotherapists with median clinical experience of 6.75 years. Validity of visual judgement was established by correlating scores obtained from an 11-point rating scale with criterion scores obtained from a force platform. In addition, partial correlations were used to control for the potential influence of body weight on the relationship between the visual judgements and criterion scores. Inter-observer reliability was quantified between the physiotherapists; intra-observer reliability was quantified between two tests four weeks apart. RESULTS: Mean criterion-related validity was high, regardless of whether body weight was controlled for statistically (Pearson's r = 0.84, 0.83, respectively). The standard error of estimating the criterion score was 3.3 newtons. Inter-observer reliability was high (ICC (2,1) = 0.81 at Test 1 and 0.82 at Test 2). Intra-observer reliability was high (on average ICC (2,1) = 0.88; Pearson's r = 0.90). The standard error of measurement for the 11-point scale was one unit. CONCLUSIONS: The finding of higher accuracy of making visual judgements than previously reported may be due to several aspects of design: use of a criterion score derived from the variability of the force signal which is more discriminating than variability of centre of pressure; use of a discriminating visual rating scale; specificity and clear definition of the phenomenon to be rated.

Adult↗

Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for isometric neck strength.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Age- and sex-specific reference values for neck strength based on reliable measurements in the upright position are lacking. The aim of the present study was to determine intra- and inter-tester reliability and age- and sex-specific reference values for isometric neck strength in extension, flexion and lateral flexion in sitting position measured with the David Back Clinic 140 (DBC 140) equipment. METHOD: The reliability of the DBC 140 equipment was investigated in 30 healthy volunteers and reference values were obtained from 101 healthy men and women. RESULTS: The reliability study showed that neck strength measured with the DBC 140 equipment has almost perfect intra- and inter-tester reliability (ICC values between 0.85 and 0.97). The mean value of the first in a series of three measurements was the highest for all three test leaders and for almost all directions. Results from the reference value study showed that gender is a much more important determinant of neck strength than age, body weight or body mass index (BMI). Neck strength in women was, on average, 55% of that in men, and when adjusted for body weight or BMI, the percentages were 70% and 59%, respectively. In all directions observed, neck strength decreased by approximately 20% from age 25 to 64 years. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of neck strength taken in upright position with the DBC 140 equipment have almost perfect intra- and inter-tester reliability and justify the use of this test procedure. The use of the first measurement in a test series can be recommended for use in clinical practice since it was shown to be the maximal test value and thus, had a very low intra-tester difference. The use of reference values for neck strength when evaluating patients with neck disorders needs to take gender into account.

Adult↗

Reliability of detecting 'onset of pain' and 'submaximal pain' during neural provocation testing of the upper quadrant.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conflicting results have been reported with regard to the reliability of neural tissue provocation tests and it is unclear whether repeated testing affects the test results. In the present study, the stability and reliability of the occurrence of 'onset of pain' and 'submaximal pain' throughout the range of motion during neurodynamic testing was analysed, in both a laboratory and a clinical setting. METHOD: A repeated-measures study design within and between sessions was used. In the laboratory and clinical settings, the base neurodynamic test for the median nerve was performed during a single session on a total of 27 patients with neurogenic cervico-brachial pain. In addition, the base test and three common variations were performed on two occasions by two examiners on 10 asymptomatic subjects in laboratory conditions only. Patients indicated the moment of 'submaximal pain' occurrence, whereas asymptomatic subjects indicated 'onset of pain' and 'submaximal pain'. Corresponding angles at the elbow were recorded by use of an electrogoniometer. RESULTS: In the asymptomatic group, the intra- and inter-tester reliability within the same session was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2.1 > or = 0.95; standard error of measurement (SEM) < or = 4.9 degrees). Reliability after a 48-hour interval was moderate (ICC2.1 > or = 0.69; SEM < or = 9.9 degrees). The reliability coefficients for the symptomatic group within the same session were comparable with the excellent results of the asymptomatic group, for both the laboratory (ICC2.1 = 0.98; SEM = 2.8 degrees) and clinical settings (ICC2.1 > or = 0.98; SEM < or = 3.4 degrees). Consequently, from a statistical perspective, improvements in range of motion as small as approximately 7.5 degrees may be interpreted meaningfully. No significant trend due to repeated testing could be observed when three consecutive repetitions were analysed. CONCLUSIONS: Pain provocation during neurodynamic testing is a stable phenomenon and the range of elbow extension corresponding with the moment of 'pain onset' and 'submaximal pain' may be measured reliably, both in laboratory and clinical conditions.

Adult↗

Reliability and validity of two methods of three-dimensional cervical volume measurement.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if cervical length obtained with three-dimensional ultrasound correlated with the 'true cervical volume' and to evaluate the reliability and validity of transabdominal and transvaginal three-dimensional cervical volume measurement. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. Three-dimensional cervical volume measurements were made prior to hysterectomy in 28 women. Following hysterectomy the amputated cervical volume was calculated using water displacement. For the assessment of intra- and interobserver reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used. The index of concordance between the sonographic cervical volumes and those obtained by the reference standard (true cervical volume) was assessed with the limits of agreement method and the ICC. RESULTS: Transabdominal cervical length and transvaginal cervical length correlated moderately with actual cervical volume; correlation coefficients were 0.64 and 0.57 (P < 0.05), respectively. Intraobserver reliability for both transabdominal and transvaginal cervical volume assessment was good (> 0.75). Interobserver reliability for transvaginal cervical volumes was similarly good (ICC = 0.90). However, for transabdominal measurements the interobserver reliability was poor (ICC = 0.51). The validity of both methods of three-dimensional volume assessment was poor (ICC < 0.75). This was reflected in the wide limits of agreement, which ranged from approximately - 25 mL to + 30 mL. CONCLUSION: The reliability and validity of three-dimensional cervical volume measurement are poor. Clinical introduction of cervical volume measurement should be avoided at this time.

Cervix Uteri↗

The interobserver reliability and validity of volume calculation from three-dimensional ultrasound datasets in the in vitro setting.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this validation study was to determine the interobserver reliability and validity of measurements of phantom objects of known volume using conventional and rotational techniques of volume calculation according to measurement technique. METHODS: Two observers each acquired a single three-dimensional ultrasound dataset of three water-filled objects of different size and shape. The same two observers measured all six datasets using both the conventional technique and the newer rotational technique (Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis, VOCAL( trade mark )) of volume calculation. Reliability was assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and validity by examining the percentage difference from the 'true' volume, as determined by a water displacement technique, by the limits of agreement method. RESULTS: All of the techniques were highly reliable (ICC: 0.9962-0.9997) and valid to within 4% of the 'true' volumes. There were no significant differences in reliability according to measurement plane or between observers. Measurements made with the 6 degrees rotation step were significantly more reliable than those made by all other techniques with the exception of the 9 degrees rotation step (P < 0.05) and significantly more valid than those made with the 30 degrees rotation step or conventional technique (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Volume calculation in the in vitro setting is both reliable and valid but is dependent upon the technique applied, with rotational measurements of volume proving superior to conventional techniques.

Female↗

The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability.

After head injuries, particularly mild or moderate ones, a range of post-concussion symptoms (PCS) are often reported by patients. Such symptoms may significantly affect patients' psychosocial functioning. To date, no measure of the severity of PCS has been developed. This study presents the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) as such a measure, derived from published material, and investigates its reliability. The RPQ's reliability was investigated under two experimental conditions. Study 1 examined its test-retest reliability when used as a self-report questionnaire at 7-10 days after injury. Forty-one head-injured patients completed an RPQ at 7-10 days following their head injury and again approximately 24 h later. Study 2 examined the questionnaire's inter-rater reliability when used as a measure administered by two separate investigators. Forty-six head-injured patients had an RPQ administered by an investigator at 6 months after injury. A second investigator readministered the questionnaire approximately 7 days later. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were calculated for ratings on the total symptom scores, and for individual items. High reliability was found for the total PCS scores under both experimental conditions (Rs = + 0.91 in study 1 and Rs = + 0.87 in study 2). Good reliability was also found for individual PCS items generally, although with some variation between different symptoms. The results are discussed in relation to the major difficulties involved when looking for appropriate experimental criteria against which measures of PCS can be validated.

Adolescent↗