Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PLACEBOS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of famotidine 20 mg b.d. or 40 mg b.d. in patients with erosive oesophagitis.

METHODS: This US multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study determined the effects of two twice daily oral famotidine regimens on symptom relief and healing of erosive oesophagitis in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Three hundred and eighteen patients were enrolled: 66 received placebo, 125 received famotidine 20 mg b.d., and 127 received famotidine 40 mg b.d. Patients maintained diaries of their symptoms. Endoscopy was performed at weeks 0 and 6, and again at week 12 if healing had not occurred. RESULTS: Healing at 6 and 12 weeks was (respectively) 48% (P < or = 0.01 vs. placebo) and 69% (P < or = 0.01 vs. placebo) for famotidine 40 mg b.d.; 32% and 54% (P < or = 0.01 vs. placebo) for famotidine 20 mg b.d., and 18% and 29% for placebo. At both 6 and 12 weeks the healing rates of famotidine 40 mg b.d. were significantly greater than placebo and famotidine 20 mg b.d. Compared to placebo, famotidine produced more frequent global symptom improvement and more rapid heartburn relief. There were no significant differences among treatment groups in the incidence of clinical or laboratory adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Famotidine 40 mg b.d. was a better regimen than famotidine 20 mg b.d. or placebo. The clinical efficacy paralleled the previously documented effect of the famotidine regimens on decrease of oesophageal acid exposure.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

Mesalazine (Mesasal/Claversal) 1.5 g b.d. vs. placebo in the maintenance of remission of patients with Crohn's disease.

UNLABELLED: INVESTIGATORS: This multicentre study was conducted by 29 principal investigators in 11 countries. AIMS: To compare the safety and efficacy of oral mesalazine (Mesasal/Claversal, 5-ASA) 1.5 g b.d. in comparison with placebo in the maintenance of remission in 286 patients with Crohn's disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients had to score less than 150 in their Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and had to have had one period of clinical activity (CDAI > 150) within 18 months of the study start. Patients were randomized to receive 5-ASA 1.5 g b.d. daily or matching placebo for 12 months. Study visits were scheduled for months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12, or when symptoms suggested a relapse of the disease. Relapse was defined as a CDAI score greater than 150, with at least a 60-point increase from the baseline index score. None of the patients used glucocorticoids or immunosuppressants during the trial. RESULTS: In the first group, 207 patients with Crohn's colitis or ileocolitis were randomized: there were 101 females and 106 males, in age range 18-71 years. A total of 106 patients (51 in the 5-ASA group and 55 in the placebo group) were withdrawn from the study due to adverse events, insufficient therapeutic effect, or for other reasons. This left 101 patients (51 in the 5-ASA group and 50 in the placebo group) who completed the 12-month trial. In the second group, 79 patients with Crohn's ileitis were randomized to treatment. There were 53 females and 26 males, age range 18-66 years. A total of 41 patients (19 in the 5-ASA group and 22 in the placebo group) were withdrawn from the study. This left 38 patients (17 in the 5-ASA group and 21 in the placebo group) who completed the 12-month trial. The primary efficacy variable was the CDAI. A protocol-eligible analysis and an intent-to-treat analysis were performed. No statistical differences were noted between the two analyses. In patients with Crohn's colitis or ileocolitis, or in those with ileitis, no statistically significant differences were noted with respect to the relapse rates between the 5-ASA and the placebo treatment groups. Adverse events in the gastrointestinal system were the most frequently reported in both treatment groups. Many of the events such as diarrhoea or abdominal pain are symptoms of Crohn's disease. The majority of the events reported were mild or moderate in severity. In neither study was the prevalence of adverse events or the proportion of drop-outs different between patients in the treatment or in the placebo groups. The site of the Crohn's disease had no effect on the frequency of adverse events. CONCLUSION: The relapse rates of Crohn's disease were similar for up to 12 months in both the 5-ASA 1.5 g b.d. and the placebo treatment groups.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Growth hormone treatment of adults with growth hormone deficiency: results of a 13-month placebo controlled cross-over study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study the effect of biosynthetic growth hormone (GH) replacement in growth hormone deficient adults. DESIGN: We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study of 6 months biosynthetic GH, replacement and 6 months placebo separated by a 1-month's washout period. PATIENTS: Fourteen growth hormone deficient adults were studied. MEASUREMENTS: We measured total body weight, percentage fat mass, lean body mass, muscle volume, exercise capacity, maximum oxygen consumption, muscle strength, bone mineral content, a number of biochemical parameters, IGF-I, GH antibodies and psychological well-being. RESULTS: Total body weight remained unchanged, but lean body mass increased (before GH mean +/- SEM 49.8 +/- 5.5, after 53.4 +/- 5.6 kg; placebo before 51.2 +/- 5.4, after 50.4 +/- 5.1 kg; P less than 0.05 and fat mass decreased (before GH 21.5 +/- 4.1, after 19.3 +/- 4.3; placebo before 19.3 +/- 4.0, after 22.5 +/- 4.5 kg; P less than 0.05). Thigh muscle volume increased: (before GH 94.1 +/- 7.7, after 99.5 +/- 8.4 ml; placebo before 99.3 +/- 8.6, after 95.4 +/- 7.8 ml/0.8 mm computerized tomographic slice; P less than 0.05). Exercise capacity increased (before GH 174 +/- 15, after 199 +/- 18.9 watts; placebo before 162.5 +/- 2.3, after 154 +/- 19.8 watts; P less than 0.05), as did maximum oxygen consumption (before GH 1.93 +/- 0.2, after 2.17 +/- 0.2 l/m; placebo before 1.92 +/- 0.3, after 1.98 +/- 0.2 l/m; P less than 0.05). There was no change in quadriceps muscle strength. Alkaline phosphatase increased (before GH 87.5 (32-158), after 106.0 (49-179) U/I, placebo 99.5 (50-145), after 72.0 (40-111) U/I; P less than 0.05) without a change in the spinal bone density. IGF-I increased (before GH 62 (36-97), after 216 (62-362) micrograms/l; placebo before 59 (52-112), after 60.5 (38-94) micrograms/l; P less than 0.05). Carbohydrate tolerance remained unchanged as did fasting lipids, serum sodium, potassium, urea, calcium, phosphate and liver transaminases. Psychological well-being remained unchanged. No growth hormone antibodies were detected before or after GH treatment. CONCLUSIONS: GH alters the body composition of growth hormone deficient adults and leads to improved exercise capacity; alkaline phosphatase activity increases but without a change in spinal bone density, and carbohydrate tolerance remains unaltered.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Silodosin, a new alpha1A-adrenoceptor-selective antagonist for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a phase III randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in Japanese men.

OBJECTIVE: To verify the efficacy and safety of the new alpha1A-adrenoceptor-selective antagonist silodosin compared with tamsulosin and placebo in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted at 88 centres in Japan. Men aged > or = 50 years with an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of > or = 8, a quality-of-life (QoL) score of > or = 3, a maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) of < 15 mL/s, a prostate volume of > or = 20 mL and a postvoid residual urine volume of < 100 mL were eligible for enrolment. Patients were randomized to receive silodosin 4 mg twice daily, tamsulosin 0.2 mg once daily, or placebo, for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in IPSS from baseline. Safety was assessed by adverse events, physical examination, vital signs and laboratory tests. RESULTS: In all, 457 patients were randomized (silodosin 176, tamsulosin 192 and placebo 89). The change in the total IPSS from baseline in the silodosin, tamsulosin and placebo groups was -8.3, -6.8 and -5.3, respectively. There was a significant decrease in the IPSS vs placebo in the silodosin group from 1 week. In the early-stage comparison, silodosin showed a significant decrease in IPSS vs tamsulosin at 2 weeks. The change in QoL from baseline was -1.7, -1.4 and -1.1 in the silodosin, tamsulosin and placebo groups, respectively; silodosin showed a significant improvement in the QoL score vs placebo. In the subgroup of patients with severe symptoms (IPSS > or = 20) silodosin also gave a significantly better improvement than placebo (-12.4 vs -8.7). The incidence rates of adverse events and drug-related adverse events were, respectively, 88.6%, 82.3% and 71.6% and 69.7%, 47.4% and 36.4%, respectively. The most common adverse event in the silodosin group was abnormal ejaculation, which occurred more often in the silodosin than in the tamsulosin group (22.3% vs 1.6%). However, only five men (2.9%) discontinued treatment for abnormal ejaculation. CONCLUSION: Silodosin was generally effective in the absence of obtrusive side-effects. This study suggests that silodosin is clinically useful for treating LUTS associated with BPH.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed2005

Evaluation of the S-Caine Peel for induction of local anesthesia for laser-assisted tattoo removal: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Topical anesthetics are important tools for many dermatologic procedures. The S-Caine Peel is composed of a 1:1 (w:w) eutectic mixture composed of lidocaine base 7%, USP, and tetracaine base 7%, USP. It is applied as a cream, dries on exposure to air, and forms a flexible membrane, which can be easily peeled off. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the S-Caine Peel in providing clinically useful local dermal anesthesia for laser-assisted tattoo removal and to monitor the nature and frequency of adverse events associated with the safety of the S-Caine Peel. METHODS: Thirty adult patients undergoing laser-assisted tattoo removal were enrolled in this multicentered, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Each subject received both the S-Caine Peel and placebo simultaneously for 60 minutes. The primary efficacy parameter was a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) for patient self-assessment of pain. Secondary efficacy parameters included both the investigator's and an independent observer's evaluation of subject pain (4-point categorical scale: no pain through severe pain) and the patient's and the investigator's overall impression of the local anesthetic. RESULTS: Mean VAS scores were 42 mm for the S-Caine Peel and 66 mm for placebo treatment sites (p=.001). Patients received adequate pain relief in 50% of S-Caine Peel sites versus 7% of placebo sites (p=.002). The percentage of those who would like to use the S-Caine Peel again were 43% for the S-Caine Peel compared with 7% for placebo (p=.005). Investigators' evaluations revealed that 70% of patients had less pain at S-Caine Peel treatment sites compared with 10% with less pain at placebo sites (p<.001), and 70% of the S-Caine Peel-treated sites achieved adequate anesthesia versus 10% of placebo sites (p<.001). The independent witness assessed less pain in 67% of S-Caine Peel-treated sites versus 10% of the placebo sites (p=.002). One occurrence of moderate to severe erythema was noted at both an S-Caine Peel and a placebo treatment site on removal of the S-Caine Peel after 60 minutes, which self-resolved quickly. There was no statistical difference between the two groups. Other side effects were limited to local mild, transient erythema at the application sites. CONCLUSION: Administration of the S-Caine Peel for 60 minutes prior to laser-assisted tattoo removal was effective in significantly reducing pain levels associated with the procedure.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2005

Botulinum toxin type a for the prophylaxis of chronic daily headache: subgroup analysis of patients not receiving other prophylactic medications: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A; BOTOX, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) for the prophylaxis of headaches in patients with chronic daily headache (CDH) without the confounding factor of concurrent prophylactic medications. BACKGROUND: Several open-label studies and an 11-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study suggest that BoNT-A may be an effective therapy for the prophylaxis of headaches in patients with CDH. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a subgroup analysis of an 11-month, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of BoNT-A for the treatment of adult patients with 16 or more headache days per 30-day periods conducted at 13 North American study centers. All patients had a history of migraine or probable migraine. This analysis involved data for patients who were not receiving concomitant prophylactic headache medication and who constituted 64% of the full study population. Following a 30-day screening period and a 30-day single-blind, placebo injection, eligible patients were injected with BoNT-A or placebo and assessed every 30 days for 9 months The following efficacy measures were analyzed per 30-day periods: change from baseline in number of headache-free days; change from baseline in headache frequency; proportion of patients with at least 30% or at least 50% decrease from baseline in headache frequency; and change from baseline in mean headache severity. Acute medication use was assessed, and adverse events were recorded at each study visit. RESULTS: Of the 355 patients randomized in the study, 228 (64%) were not taking prophylactic medication and were included in this analysis (117 received BoNT-A, 111 received placebo injections). Mean age was 42.4+/-10.90 years; the mean frequency of headaches per 30 days at baseline was 14.1 for the BoNT-A group and 12.9 for the placebo group (P=.205). After two injection sessions, the maximum change in the mean frequency of headaches per 30 days was -7.8 in the BoNT-A group compared with only -4.5 in the placebo group (P=.032), a statistically significant between-group difference of 3.3 headaches. The between-group difference favoring BoNT-A treatment continued to improve to 4.2 headaches after a third injection session (P=.023). In addition, BoNT-A treatment at least halved the frequency of baseline headaches in over 50% of patients after three injection sessions compared to baseline. Statistically significant differences between BoNT-A and placebo were evident for the change from baseline in headache frequency and headache severity for most time points from day 180 through day 270. Only 5 patients (4 patients receiving BoNT-A treatment; 1 patient receiving placebo) discontinued the study due to adverse events and most treatment-related events were transient and mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: BoNT-A is an effective and well-tolerated prophylactic treatment in migraine patients with CDH who are not using other prophylactic medications.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Conditioned opponent responses: effects of placebo challenge in alcoholic subjects.

The present study continues a series of studies examining a number of variables that contribute to the demonstration of conditioned responses to alcohol in alcoholics. We pursued here the hypothesis that subjects receiving placebo in an environment previously associated with alcohol ingestion would exhibit conditioned responses as compared with subjects who had only received placebo in the environment. Further, we predicted that these conditioned responses would be opposite in direction to responses obtained during active drink sessions. Twelve subjects received active alcohol during session Days 1 through 4 and a placebo challenge on Day 5; the second group received placebo throughout sessions 1 through 5. On Day 1, heart rate and skin conductance were elevated following active alcohol ingestion as compared with placebo. On Day 5 following the placebo challenge, these physiological responses were significantly lower in the alcohol group as compared with the placebo group; the reversal of effects on Day 5 is suggestive of conditioned compensatory responses. Also, following the placebo on Day 5, desire to drink scores of the alcohol group were greater than those of the placebo group. The present data suggest that subjects exhibit conditioned compensatory responses when the environment signals alcohol availability. Results are consistent with Siegel's model of conditioned compensatory responses to repeated drug administration, and may help to account for some aspects of tolerance development and conditioned withdrawal.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Esomeprazole 40 mg once a day in patients with functional dyspepsia: the randomized, placebo-controlled "ENTER" trial.

OBJECTIVE: The etiologies of functional dyspepsia (FD) are unclear, but in some studies, treatment with a proton pump inhibitor has been beneficial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of esomeprazole 40 mg once a day compared to placebo in achieving symptom relief in primary care patients with FD. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in adult FD patients, who had at least moderate severity of symptoms, defined as a score of > or =4 on a 7-point Global Overall Symptom (GOS) scale. Patients were excluded if they had predominant symptoms of heartburn or regurgitation; after a normal baseline endoscopy, patients were randomized to esomeprazole 40 mg once daily or placebo for 8 wk. The primary outcome measure was symptom relief (GOS < or =2) at 8 wk. RESULTS: Of the 502 enrolled patients, 224 were randomized. The main reasons for exclusion were abnormal endoscopic findings, especially esophagitis. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the esomeprazole group achieved symptom relief at 4 but not at 8 wk compared to placebo: 4 wk esomeprazole 50.5% versus placebo 32.2%, p= 0.009; 8 wk esomeprazole 55.1% versus placebo 46.1%, p= 0.16. A similar relationship at 4 and 8 wk was seen for symptom resolution (GOS = 1) and improvement (DeltaGOS > or =2). CONCLUSION: For the primary outcome measure of symptom relief at 8 wk, there was no statistically significant difference between esomeprazole 40 mg once a day and placebo. However, at 4 wk, esomeprazole was significantly more effective than placebo for symptom relief. The difference in therapeutic gain between 4 and 8 wk was largely due to a higher placebo response rate at 8 wk.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1991

Efficacy and safety of alprazolam, imipramine and placebo in treating panic disorder. A Scandinavian multicenter study.

As part of the cross-national collaborative panic study, a double-blind comparison of alprazolam, imipramine and placebo was performed in Scandinavian outpatients with panic disorder according to DSM-III; 41 patients were randomly allocated to each drug. Doses were increased for 3 weeks to an average of about 6 mg alprazolam, 150 mg imipramine and a corresponding number of placebo capsules, which were then given for 5 weeks. No more than supportive psychotherapy was given. Key symptoms were rated weekly. The drugs were tapered for 4 or 8 weeks and the patients were followed up for 6 months. Compliance at 3 weeks was 95% for alprazolam, 83% for imipramine and 88% for placebo; at 8 weeks 95% for alprazolam, 73% for imipramine and 46% for placebo. At 3 weeks plasma determination showed that the proportion taking diazepam outside the protocol was 0% for alprazolam, 19% for imipramine and 31% for placebo; at 8 weeks the corresponding proportions were 3%, 11% and 16%. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that freedom from panic attacks was obtained for 68% with alprazolam, 61% with imipramine and 34% with placebo. Alprazolam was more effective than imipramine and placebo on anticipatory anxiety and phobic symptoms. Globally rated by physicians and patients, about 60% had complete remission with alprazolam and imipramine and 30% on placebo. At least partial remission was obtained in about 85% with alprazolam, 70% with imipramine and 40% with placebo. Alprazolam had a more rapid onset of action than imipramine on all symptoms. Side effects were generally mild, with a preponderance of drowsiness for alprazolam and anticholinergic effects for imipramine. Tapering was uneventful without significant discontinuation phenomena. During taper and follow-up, several patients in remission relapsed, leaving approximately 30% patients in complete remission in all groups. To obtain more stable improvement, either long-term drug treatment or combinations of drug treatment and psychotherapy should be evaluated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Efficacy and safety of oral tadalafil in the treatment of men in Canada with erectile dysfunction: a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a highly prevalent, often undertreated condition. AIM: This 12-week, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study was conducted at 25 sites in Canada to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, for the treatment of ED. METHODS: Men with ED of organic, psychogenic, or mixed etiology were stratified by baseline ED severity then randomly assigned to placebo (N = 50), tadalafil 10 mg (N = 103), or tadalafil 20 mg (N = 100), taken as needed (maximum, once daily). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy was assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), a Sexual Encounter Profile diary, and a global assessment question (GAQ). RESULTS: Tadalafil 10 mg and tadalafil 20 mg significantly improved erectile function compared with placebo (P < 0.001, all measures). At end point, the mean IIEF erectile function (EF) domain scores were 14.5, 21.2, and 23.3 of a possible score of 30 for placebo, tadalafil 10 mg, and tadalafil 20 mg, respectively. Patients treated with tadalafil reported greater change from baseline on the IIEF EF domain score compared with placebo, regardless of baseline ED severity. During treatment, the mean per-patient proportion of successful intercourse attempts was higher for tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg than for placebo (placebo, 31.9%; tadalafil 10 mg, 56.7%; and tadalafil 20 mg, 61.5%), and a greater proportion of patients reported improved erections with tadalafil (GAQ; placebo, 22.0%; tadalafil 10 mg, 67.0%; tadalafil 20 mg, 79.0%). Fifty percent and 62% of patients treated with tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg, respectively, achieved successful sexual intercourse after their first dose, compared with 31% with placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events were generally mild or moderate. CONCLUSION: Tadalafil was an effective, well-tolerated therapy for ED of broad-spectrum etiology and severity.

3',5'-Cyclic-GMP Phosphodiesterases↗
PubMed2000

Penicillin for acute sore throat: randomised double blind trial of seven days versus three days treatment or placebo in adults.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether treatment with penicillin for three days and the traditional treatment for seven days were equally as effective at accelerating resolution of symptoms in patients with sore throat compared with placebo. DESIGN: Randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. SETTING: 43 family practices in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 561 patients, aged 15-60 years, with sore throat for less than seven days and at least three of the four Centor criteria-that is, history of fever, absence of cough, swollen tender anterior cervical lymph nodes, and tonsillar exudate. 142 patients were excluded for medical reasons and 73 needed penicillin. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to penicillin V for seven days, penicillin V for three days followed by placebo for four days, or placebo for seven days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Resolution of symptoms in the first week, eradication of bacteria after two weeks, and recurrences of sore throat after two, four, and six months. RESULTS: Symptoms resolved 1.9 and 1.7 days earlier in patients taking penicillin for seven days than in those taking penicillin for three days or placebo respectively. Symptoms resolved 2.5 days earlier in patients with group A streptococci and 1.3 days earlier in patients with high colony counts of non-group A streptococci. 23 (13%) of the placebo group had to be given antibiotics later in the week because of clinical deterioration; three developed a peritonsillar abscess. The eradication rate for group A streptococci was 72% in the seven day penicillin group, 41% in the three day penicillin group, and 7% in the placebo group. Sore throat recurred more often in the three day penicillin group than in the seven day penicillin or placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Penicillin treatment for seven days was superior to treatment for three days or placebo in resolving symptoms of sore throat in patients with group A streptococcal pharyngitis and, possibly, in those with non-group A streptococcal pharyngitis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Amiodarone prophylaxis for tachycardias after coronary artery surgery: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Arrhythmias are a common cause of morbidity after cardiac surgery. This study assessed the efficacy of prophylactic amiodarone in reducing the incidence of atrial fibrillation or flutter and ventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery surgery. METHODS: A double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial. 60 patients received a 24 hour intravenous infusion of amiodarone (15 mg/kg started after removal of the aortic cross clamp) followed by 200 mg orally three times daily for 5 days, and 60 patients received placebo. RESULTS: 6 patients (10%) in the amiodarone group and 14 (23%) in the placebo group needed treatment for arrhythmias (95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the difference between groups was 0 to 26%, p = 0.05). The incidence of supraventricular tachycardia detected clinically and requiring treatment was lower in the amiodarone group (8% amiodarone v 20% placebo, 95% CI 0 to 24%, p = 0.07). The incidence detected by 24 hour Holter monitoring was similar (17% amiodarone v 20% placebo). Untreated arrhythmias in the amiodarone group were either clinically benign and undetected (n = 3) or the ventricular response rate was slow (n = 2). Age > 60 years was a positive risk factor for the development of supraventricular tachycardia in the amiodarone group but not in the placebo group. Fewer patients had episodes of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation recorded on Holter monitoring in the amiodarone group (15% amiodarone v 33% placebo, 95% CI 3 to 33%, p = 0.02). Bradycardia (78% amiodarone v 48% placebo, 95% CI 14% to 46%, p < 0.005) and pauses (7% amiodarone v 0% placebo) occurred in more amiodarone treated patients. Bradycardia warranted discontinuation of treatment in one patient treated with amiodarone. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of clinically significant tachycardia was reduced by amiodarone. The ventricular response rate was slowed in supraventricular tachycardia, but the induction of bradycardia may preclude the routine use of amiodarone for prophylaxis.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Placebo controlled trial of felodipine in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. UK Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of felodipine and placebo in patients with New York Heart Association functional class II or III and stable congestive heart failure despite treatment with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, diuretic, or digoxin, or any combination of these three drugs. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: 252 patients were randomised in a double blind, parallel group study after a 2-4 week placebo run-in to oral treatment with either felodipine extended release formulation or placebo 2.5-10 mg twice daily given in addition to existing background medication for a further 12 weeks. METHODS: Patients aged 18-75 years of either sex with chronic congestive heart failure due to ischaemic heart disease, hypertensive heart disease, or dilated cardiomyopathy with or without secondary mitral insufficiency that was stable during the preceding two months were included in the study. Treadmill exercise tests according to the modified Naughton protocol were performed at baseline, and after six, 11, and 12 weeks of treatment. Signs and symptoms of heart failure were assessed at every visit. Physical examination was performed and left ventricular ejection fraction measured at baseline and after 12 weeks. RESULTS: Mean (SD) baseline exercise test times increased from 434 (162) s and 480 (157) s for felodipine and placebo groups respectively to 541 (217) s and 591 (218) s at 12 weeks or the last visit. The change in exercise from baseline to last visit was 107 (141) s for patients given felodipine and 112 (128) s for those given placebo (P > 0.20). There was also no difference between treatments with respect to the other efficacy variables. There were few deaths in the study (felodipine n = 3, placebo n = 2). More patients who received felodipine were withdrawn from treatment (n = 29) than those who received placebo (n = 17). The most common adverse events of the 54 and 28 cited as reasons for withdrawal in the felodipine and placebo groups respectively were increased need for non-study heart failure treatment (n = 10; 8%)--that is, starting new medication or changes in the dosage of existing treatment for patients given felodipine, and nausea (n = 4; 3%) for those given placebo. Patients withdrawn from the study due to increased need for non-study heart failure treatment rapidly stabilised and recovered. CONCLUSION: Felodipine has not been shown to be of benefit in patients with mild to moderate heart failure.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Glycine antagonist (GV150526) in acute stroke: a multicentre, double-blind placebo-controlled phase II trial.

GV150526 is a novel glycine antagonist at the NMDA receptor complex. It is a potent neuroprotective agent in animal models of acute stroke including permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. GV150526 was very well tolerated in early human studies. The purpose of this randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial was to assess the safety and population pharmacokinetics of GV150526 in patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute stroke. Exploratory assessment of efficacy, quality of life and resource utilisation was also undertaken. Upon clinical diagnosis of acute stroke within 12 h of onset of symptoms, patients were treated with a loading dose of 800 mg GV150526 (or placebo), followed by 5 maintenance doses of 400 mg GV150526 (or placebo) given every 12 h over 3 days. Following observation of asymptomatic hyperbilirubinaemia, the maintenance dose was reduced mid-study to 200 mg. CT/MRI scanning was not mandatory prior to treatment. The study treated 128 patients (38 with GV 800 mg/400 mg, 48 with GV 800 mg/200 mg and 42 with placebo). Fewer patients with mild stroke (NIH scores < or =5) were enrolled in the GV150526-treated groups than in the placebo group (placebo 38%, GV 800 mg/400 mg 18%, GV 800 mg/200 mg 15%). There was also an imbalance in the proportion of patients with haemorrhagic strokes (placebo 5%, GV 800 mg/400 mg 3%, GV 800 mg/200 mg 15%). Mortality at 1 month was unbalanced between treatment groups, being 10, 18 and 17% in the placebo, GV 800 mg/400 mg and GV 800 mg/200 mg groups, respectively (no significant difference). Similarly, adverse events, though consistent with an acute stroke population, appeared more often in the GV 800 mg/200 mg group. Functional outcomes at 1 month also showed imbalances, the percentage of patients with a Barthel Index score of > or =95 at 1 month being 52, 39 and 27% in the placebo, GV 800 mg/400 mg and GV 800 mg/200 mg groups, respectively. These results probably reflect a prognostically significant baseline difference between the groups rather than the effect of GV150526. GV150526 was generally well tolerated in patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute stroke and formal efficacy studies were considered justified.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Efficacy and safety of a new prolonged release formulation of alfuzosin 10 mg once daily versus alfuzosin 2.5 mg thrice daily and placebo in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. ALFORTI Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of a new prolonged release formulation of the uroselective alpha(1)-blocker alfuzosin for a once-daily dosing regimen in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: After a 1-month run-in period, 447 patients were randomly allocated in a double-blind placebo-controlled study to receive alfuzosin 10 mg once daily (n = 143), alfuzosin 2.5 mg thrice daily (n = 150) or placebo (n = 154) for 3 months. At inclusion, 46% of the randomised population had concomitant cardiovascular disease and 30% received an antihypertensive treatment. Uroflowmetry was performed close to trough plasma concentration of alfuzosin once daily to demonstrate the 24-hour coverage with this formulation. RESULTS: Both alfuzosin formulations significantly improved urinary symptoms versus placebo assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (alfuzosin 10 mg once daily: -6.9; alfuzosin 2.5 mg thrice daily: -6.4; placebo: -4.9, p = 0.005). Peak flow rate increased significantly with alfuzosin 10 mg once daily (+2.3 ml/s, p = 0.03 vs. placebo) and with alfuzosin 2.5 mg thrice daily (+3.2ml/s, p<0.0001 vs. placebo) compared to placebo (+1.4 ml/s). Overall both formulations of alfuzosin were well tolerated in comparison with placebo. In addition, vasodilatory adverse events appeared to be less frequent with the once daily than the thrice daily formulation (6.3 vs. 9.4%, respectively). No first-day effect was reported with alfuzosin once daily and the effect on blood pressure did not differ from those observed in placebo, both in normotensive and hypertensive patients. No specific sexual dysfunction including ejaculation disorder was reported in the alfuzosin 10 mg once-daily group. CONCLUSION: The new once-daily formulation of alfuzosin administered at a dose of 10 mg daily is an effective 24-hour treatment of LUTS associated with BPH. Alfuzosin is as effective as the immediate formulation and shows a better cardiovascular safety. The better safety profile enables the same dose to be used in all patients, providing the patients with the benefits of a once-daily administration.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1986

Effect of the addition of propranolol to therapy with nifedipine for unstable angina pectoris: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

The value of the addition of beta-blockers to coronary vasodilator therapy in the treatment of patients with unstable angina at rest is controversial. We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 4 week trial of propranolol in 81 patients with unstable angina, 39 of whom were assigned to placebo and 42 of whom received propranolol in a dose of at least 160 mg daily. All patients were also treated with coronary vasodilators, including 80 mg nifedipine daily and long-acting nitrates. The incidences of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and requirement for bypass surgery or coronary angioplasty did not differ between the two groups (propranolol = 16; placebo = 18). The propranolol group had a lower cumulative probability of experiencing recurrent resting angina than the placebo group (p = .013), and over the first 4 days of the trial the mean number of clinical episodes of angina (propranolol 0.9 +/- 0.2, placebo 1.8 +/- 0.3, p = .036), duration of angina (propranolol 15.1 +/- 4.3 min, placebo 38.1 +/- 8.4, p = .014), and nitroglycerin requirement (propranolol 1.1 +/- 0.3 tablets, placebo 3.5 +/- 0.8, p = .003) were also fewer. Continuous electrocardiographic recording for ischemic ST segment changes revealed fewer daily ischemic episodes in the propranolol group (2.0 +/- 0.5) than in the placebo group (3.8 +/- 0.7, p = .03), and a shorter duration of ischemia (propranolol 43 +/- 10 min, placebo 104 +/- 28 min, p = .039). Thus propranolol, in patients with unstable angina, in the presence of nitrates and nifedipine is not detrimental and reduces the frequency and duration of symptomatic and silent ischemic episodes.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Double-blind efficacy and safety study of a novel anti-ischemic agent, ranolazine, versus placebo in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. Ranolazine Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Ranolazine modulates the metabolism of ischemic myocardial cells and improves the efficiency of oxygen use. This study was conducted to evaluate the antianginal and anti-ischemic effects and safety of different doses of ranolazine administered three times daily (tid) compared with placebo in patients with stable angina pectoris. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with stable angina pectoris took part in the study. Previous antianginal drugs were discontinued under medical supervision. Three hundred nineteen patients received single-blind placebo for up to 18 days, and 318 stopped exercise because of angina of moderate severity, had evidence of myocardial ischemia (> or = 1-mm ST segment depression), and were randomized to one of four study groups in a double-blind manner: ranolazine 30 mg tid (n = 81), ranolazine 60 mg tid (n = 81), ranolazine 120 mg tid (n = 78), and placebo tid (n = 79). After the 4-week double-blind phase, symptom-limited exercise tests were repeated at 1 hour (peak test) and 8 hours (trough test) after the study medication was administered. In addition, patients kept an angina diary throughout the study and wore a Holter monitor for 48 hours. Total exercise duration at baseline (+/- SEM) was 5.9 +/- 0.2 minutes for the placebo group and 6.4 +/- 0.3, 5.9 +/- 0.3, and 6.6 +/- 0.2 minutes for the ranolazine 30-, 60-, and 120-mg groups, respectively (P = NS). After 4 weeks of double-blind therapy, compared with baseline values, at 1 hour after the study medication was administered (peak effect), total exercise duration (+/- SEM) increased by 0.45 +/- 0.2 minutes in the placebo group and by 0.3 +/- 0.2, 0.6 +/- 0.2, and 0.5 +/- 0.2 minutes in the ranolazine 30-, 60-, and 120-mg groups, respectively (placebo versus ranolazine, P = NS). Times to 1-mm ST segment depression at baseline were similar in the four groups and, after 4 weeks of therapy in each group, increased significantly by similar magnitudes at 1 hour after the administration of the medications. Similar changes were seen for the time to onset of angina. Eight hours after administration (trough effect), no differences in total exercise time or any other exercise variables were observed between the placebo and the ranolazine groups. Compared with the baseline values, the number of anginal attacks per week and the number and duration of ischemic episodes per 48 hours during Holter monitoring decreased significantly by similar magnitudes in the placebo and ranolazine groups. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with ranolazine 30, 60, and 120 mg tid was not superior to placebo. Our study does not support the published beneficial effects of similar doses of ranolazine on either myocardial ischemia or exercise performance or on anginal attacks during daily life in patients with angina pectoris.

Acetanilides↗
PubMed1997

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of supplemental vitamin E on attenuation of the development of nitrate tolerance.

BACKGROUND: The attenuation of intracellular production of cGMP has been known to be a mechanism of nitrate tolerance. A recent in vitro study showed an increase in superoxide levels and a reduced activation of guanylate cyclase in tolerant vessels. We investigated the preventive effect of an antioxidant, vitamin E, on the development of nitrate tolerance. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 24 normal volunteers and 24 patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD patients) were randomized to receive either vitamin E (200 mg TID vitamin E group) or placebo (placebo group). Vasodilator response to nitroglycerin was assessed with forearm plethysmography by measurement of the change in the forearm blood flow before and 5 minutes after sublingual administration of 0.3 mg nitroglycerin, and at the same time, blood samples were taken from veins to measure the platelet cGMP level. Measurements of the forearm blood flow and blood sampling were obtained serially at baseline (day 0), 3 days after vitamin E or placebo alone was taken (day 3), and 3 days after application of a 10-mg/24-h nitroglycerin tape concomitantly with oral vitamin E or placebo (day 6). The responses of forearm blood flow (%FBF) and cGMP (%cGMP) after sublingual nitroglycerin on day 0 (%FBF: normal volunteers, 32+/-12 versus 31+/-11; IHD patients, 35+/-15 versus 34+/-15; %cGMP: normal volunteers, 38+/-10 versus 35+/-11; IHD patients, 37+/-11 versus 38+/-12, vitamin E group versus placebo group) and day 3 (%FBF: normal volunteers, 33+/-9 versus 32+/-12; IHD patients, 35+/-12 versus 33+/-13; %cGMP: normal volunteers, 38+/-10 versus 37+/-11; IHD patients, 36+/-14 versus 37+/-10, vitamin E group versus placebo group) were not different between the two groups. On day 6, %FBF and %cGMP in the placebo group were significantly lower compared with day 0, and there were significant differences in them between the two groups (%FBF: normal volunteers, 30+/-12 versus 17+/-9, P<.01; IHD patients, 28+/-14 versus 17+/-8, P<.01; %cGMP: normal volunteers, 35+/-11 versus 8+/-5, P<.01; IHD patients, 38+/-10 versus 12+/-4, P<.01, vitamin E group versus placebo group). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the combination therapy with vitamin E is potentially a useful method to prevent the development of nitrate tolerance.

Administration, Oral↗