SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Intracellular Toxoplasma gondii grown in human foreskin fibroblast cells transported nitrobenzylthioinosine [NBMPR; 6-[(4-nitrobenzyl)mercapto]-9-beta-D-ribofuranosylpurine], an inhibitor of nucleoside transport in mammalian cells, as well as the nonphysiological beta-L-enantiomers of purine nucleosides, beta-L-adenosine, beta-L-deoxyadenosine, and beta-L-guanosine. The beta-L-pyrimidine nucleosides, beta-L-uridine, beta-L-cytidine, and beta-L-thymidine, were not transported. The uptake of NBMPR and the nonphysiological purine nucleoside beta-L-enantiomers by the intracellular parasites also implies that Toxoplasma-infected cells can transport these nucleosides. In sharp contrast, under the same conditions, uninfected fibroblast cells did not transport NBMPR or any of the unnatural beta-L-nucleosides. beta-D-Adenosine and dipyridamole, another inhibitor of nucleoside transport, inhibited the uptake of NBMPR and beta-L-stereoisomers of the purine nucleosides by intracellular Toxoplasma and Toxoplasma-infected cells. Furthermore, infection with a Toxoplasma mutant deficient in parasite adenosine/purine nucleoside transport reduced or abolished the uptake of beta-D-adenosine, NBMPR, and purine beta-L-nucleosides. Hence, the presence of the Toxoplasma adenosine/purine nucleoside transporters is apparently essential for the uptake of NBMPR and purine beta-L-nucleosides by intracellular Toxoplasma and Toxoplasma-infected cells. These results also demonstrate that, in contrast to the mammalian nucleoside transporters, the Toxoplasma adenosine/purine nucleoside transporter(s) lacks stereospecificity and substrate specificity in the transport of purine nucleosides. In addition, infection with T. gondii confers the properties of the parasite's purine nucleoside transport on the parasitized host cells and enables the infected cells to transport purine nucleosides that were not transported by uninfected cells. These unique characteristics of purine nucleoside transport in T. gondii may aid in the identification of new promising antitoxoplasmic drugs.
The reversible phosphorolysis of purine and pyrimidine nucleosides is an important biochemical reaction in the salvage pathway, which provides an alternative to the de novo purine and pyrimidine biosynthetic pathways. Structural studies in our laboratory and by others have revealed that only two folds exist that catalyse the phosphorolysis of all nucleosides, and provide the basis for defining two families of nucleoside phosphorylases. The first family (nucleoside phosphorylase-I) includes enzymes that share a common single-domain subunit, with either a trimeric or a hexameric quaternary structure, and accept a range of both purine and pyrimidine nucleoside substrates. Despite differences in substrate specificity, amino acid sequence and quaternary structure, all members of this family share a characteristic subunit topology. We have also carried out a sequence motif study that identified regions of the common subunit fold that are functionally significant in differentiating the various members of the nucleoside phosphorylase-I family. Although the substrate-binding sites are arranged similarly for all members of the nucleoside phosphorylase-I family, a comparison of the active sites from the known structures of this family indicates significant differences between the trimeric and hexameric family members. Sequence comparisons also suggest structural identity between the nucleoside phosphorylase-I family and both 5'-methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine nucleosidase and AMP nucleosidase. Members of the second family of nucleoside phosphorylases (nucleoside phosphorylase-II) share a common two-domain subunit fold and a dimeric quaternary structure, share a significant level of sequence identity (>30%) and are specific for pyrimidine nucleosides. Members of this second family accept both thymidine and uridine substrates in lower organisms, but are specific for thymidine in mammals and other higher organisms. A possible relationship between nucleoside phosphorylase-II and anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase has been identified through sequence comparisons. Initial studies in our laboratory suggested that members of the nucleoside phosphorylase-II family require significant domain movements in order for catalysis to proceed. A series of recent structures has confirmed our hypothesis and provided details of these conformational changes. Structural studies of the nucleoside phosphorylases have resulted in a wealth of information that begins to address fundamental biological questions, such as how Nature makes use of the intricate relationships between structure and function, and how biological processes have evolved over time. In addition, the therapeutic potential of suppressing the nucleoside phosphorylase activity in either family of enzymes has motivated efforts to design potent inhibitors. Several research groups have synthesized a variety of nucleoside phosphorylase inhibitors that are at various stages of preclinical and clinical evaluation.
The aims of this study were to determine the effect of levels of various substances and reaction by-products, which are formed during hydrolysis of nucleic acids, on the derivatization and chromatography of nucleosides; and to investigate the silylation of mono- and dinucleotides. The effect of NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, NH4Cl, and (NH4)2SO4 on silylation and chromatography of nucleosides was studies at various molar excesses of salt. The response values for all nucleosides were studied at various molar excesses of salt. The response values for all nucleosides were significantly affected at molar excess salt present values (MSP) between 1 and 10 for KCl, NaCl, NH4Cl, (NH4)2SO4 and between 0.1 and 1 for MgCl2. It was noted that thymidine was more sensitive than other nucleosides if silylated in presence of these salts. Two chromatographic peaks at retention temperatures (RT) 240 and 251 were obtained for cytidine at MSP values of 10(-3) for NaCl, KCl, and MgCl2, and 10(-4) for NH4Cl and (NH4)2SO4. In a mixture of nucleosides the RT = 251 peak was used for quantitative analysis of cytidine as the RT = 240 peak elutes with guanosine. Thus, these salts have a significant effect on the gas-liquid chromatography of trimethylsilyl (TMS) cytidine in a mixture of nucleosides, especially the RT = 241 peak. The effect of salts on derivatization can be explained in part as follows: (a) reduced derivatization of nucleosides due to a decreased solubility in the solvent system; (b) formation of TMS anion derivatives, e.g. TMS-SO4, TMS-PO4, with a reduced molar excess of BSTFA; (c) metal chelation by Mg ions or other divalent cations with nucleosides or BSTFA; and/or (d) an increased breakdown of TMS derivatives in presence of salt in the sample or on the top 3 in. of the column packing. Also, experiments were made on the effect of other substances such as Tris, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, and KCl on completeness of silylation. The individual impurities showed no significant effect on the relative weight response (RWR) values of nucleosides; however, when a mixture was used, significantly lower RWR values were observed for all nucleosides except thymidine when using 1000 molar excess of BSTFA greater than 1000 should be used for silylation and chromatography of nucleosides in an RNA hydrolysate. As reported earlier the best derivatization of nucleosides was achieved using closed tube silylation at 150 degrees for 15 min with 225 molar excess BSTFA and chromatography on 4% OV-11 on Supelcoport. In general, the presence of salts and other substances can be significant in quantitative work, thus it is suggested that they be removed using chromatographic cleanup methods. The stability of nucleosides as a function of concentration of HCl, at room temperature was studied and very low RWR values for nucleosides were obtained when stored for 48 h in greater than 0.001 N HCl. Trimethylsilylation of various nucleotides and dinucleotides were made at 15 min as a function of temperature, and at 150 degrees at different times...
Renal handling of physiological and pharmacological nucleosides is a major determinant of their plasma levels and tissue availabilities. Additionally, the pharmacokinetics and normal tissue toxicities of nucleoside drugs are influenced by their handling in the kidney. Renal reabsorption or secretion of nucleosides is selective and dependent on integral membrane proteins, termed nucleoside transporters (NTs) present in renal epithelia. The 7 known human NTs (hNTs) exhibit varying permeant selectivities and are divided into 2 protein families: the solute carrier (SLC) 29 (SLC29A1, SLC29A2, SLC29A3, SLC29A4) and SLC28 (SLC28A1, SLC28A2, SLC28A3) proteins, otherwise known, respectively, as the human equilibrative NTs (hENTs, hENT1, hENT2, hENT3, hENT4) and human concentrative NTs (hCNTs, hCNT1, hCNT2, hCNT3). The well characterized hENTs (hENT1 and hENT2) are bidirectional facilitative diffusion transporters in plasma membranes; hENT3 and hENT4 are much less well known, although hENT3, found in lysosomal membranes, transports nucleosides and is pH dependent, whereas hENT4-PMAT is a H+-adenosine cotransporter as well as a monoamine-organic cation transporter. The 3 hCNTs are unidirectional secondary active Na+-nucleoside cotransporters. In renal epithelial cells, hCNT1, hCNT2, and hCNT3 at apical membranes, and hENT1 and hENT2 at basolateral membranes, apparently work in concert to mediate reabsorption of nucleosides from lumen to blood, driven by Na+ gradients. Secretion of some physiological nucleosides, therapeutic nucleoside analog drugs, and nucleotide metabolites of therapeutic nucleoside and nucleobase drugs likely occurs through various xenobiotic transporters in renal epithelia, including organic cation transporters, organic anion transporters, multidrug resistance related proteins, and multidrug resistance proteins. Mounting evidence suggests that hENT1 may have a presence at both apical and basolateral membranes of renal epithelia, and thus may participate in both selective secretory and reabsorptive fluxes of nucleosides. In this review, the renal handling of nucleosides is examined with respect to physiological and clinical implications for the regulation of human kidney NTs and adenosine signaling, intracellular nucleoside transport, and nephrotoxicities associated with some nucleoside drugs.
In this review, we have summarized recent advances in our understanding of the biology of nucleoside transport arising from new insights provided by the isolation and functional expression of cDNAs encoding the major nucleoside transporters of mammalian cells. Nucleoside transporters are required for permeation of nucleosides across biological membranes and are present in the plasma membranes of most cell types. There is growing evidence that functional nucleoside transporters are required for translocation of nucleosides between intracellular compartments and thus are also present in organellar membranes. Functional studies during the 1980s established that nucleoside transport in mammalian cells occurs by two mechanistically distinct processes, facilitated diffusion and Na(+)-nucleoside cotransport. The determination of the primary amino acid sequences of the equilibrative and concentrative transporters of human and rat cells has provided a structural basis for the functional differences among the different transporter subtypes. Although nucleoside transporter proteins were first purified from human erythrocytes a decade ago, the low abundance of nucleoside transporter proteins in membranes of mammalian cells has hindered analysis of relationships between transporter structure and function. The molecular cloning of cDNAs encoding nucleoside transporters and the development of heterologous expression systems for production of recombinant nucleoside transporters, when combined with recombinant DNA technologies, provide powerful tools for characterization of functional domains within transporter proteins that are involved in nucleoside recognition and translocation. As relationships between molecular structure and function are determined, it should be possible to develop new approaches for optimizing the transportability of nucleoside drugs into diseased tissues, for development of new transport inhibitors, including reagents that are targeted to the concentrative transporters, and, eventually, for manipulation of transporter function through an understanding of the regulation of transport activity.
Toxoplasma gondii possesses a highly active nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase, which has been shown to be an immunodominant antigen in mice and humans. Two isoforms (I and II) which exhibit different activities with respect to hydrolysis of ATP exist. Past studies suggest that all strains of T. gondii contain the less active nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase II, whilst only virulent strains contain the nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase I isoform. In order to further investigate the correlation between nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase isoform and biological significance, we cloned and expressed as glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins the full-length nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase I and II isoforms and two truncations of the nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase I isoform in Escherichia coli. We then used ELISAs with the full-length recombinant nucleoside triphosphate hydrolases as antigens to examine 188 naturally infected T. gondii-positive sera and 83 T. gondii-negative sera for antibody reactivity. All positive sera reacted to T. gondii whole tachyzoite lysate antigen, 31 sera reacted to both nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase isoforms, three sera reacted specifically to nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase I and two sera reacted to only nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase II. Immunoblot analysis of the five sera reacting to either nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase I or II revealed both quantitative and qualitative differences in reactivity to the two isoforms. Comparative immunoblot analysis using the truncations of the nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase I isoform, and one of these positive sera identified a presumptive differential epitope between the nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase I and II isoforms within an 81 amino acid region (amino acids 445-526) at the C-terminus of the nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase I isoform. This differential reactivity was further localised to the 12-residue region of greatest variability between the two isoforms (residues 488-499) using synthetic peptides. This is the first report where naturally infected human sera have been used to identify a differential epitope. Because this region is essential for substrate binding, an antibody response to this region may play some role in inhibition of this highly active enzyme.
Riboviruses and retroviruses have been shown to spontaneously mutate at an extraordinarily high rate. While this genetic diversity allows viral subpopulations to escape conventional antivirals, it also has a cost. Indeed, this high mutation rate results in the synthesis of many defective virions. Stealth nucleosides are nucleoside analogues that are designed to increase the already high spontaneous mutation rate of viruses to the point where the virus cannot further replicate, a process known as "lethal mutagenesis". Rather than causing chain termination and attempting to immediately halt viral replication, as with conventional nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), stealth nucleosides are incorporated into the viral genome during replication and, by mispairing, cause mutations to the viral genome. These mutations affect all viral proteins and cumulatively, over a number of replication cycles, are lethal to the virus. There are two distinct stealth nucleoside platforms: DNA stealth nucleosides and RNA stealth nucleosides. DNA stealth nucleosides are currently being screened for activity against HIV and may have activity against hepatitis B virus and smallpox virus, with the clinical lead DNA stealth nucleoside demonstrating activity in the low nanomolar range. In addition, DNA stealth nucleosides have been shown to be able to effectively treat NRTI-resistant HIV strains in vitro, which is not surprising given that the two principal modes of resistance (low affinity of reverse transcriptase for a modified sugar or pyrophosphorolysis) should not be applicable to DNA stealth nucleosides. RNA stealth nucleosides are being developed for the treatment of ribovirus infections, and particularly hepatitis C virus infection. RNA stealth nucleosides are selected for their broad spectrum of antiviral activity, and current lead RNA stealth nucleosides have potency in the same range as ribavirin.
Nucleoside transporters play a critical role in the absorption, disposition, and targeting of therapeutically used nucleosides and nucleoside analogs. This review is focused on the Na(+)-dependent, concentrative nucleoside transporters which are found in a variety of cells including renal, intestinal and hepatic epithelia. Five major Na(+)-dependent nucleoside transporter subtypes have been characterized in isolated tissue preparations: N1 is purine selective; N2 is pyrimidine selective and N3-N5 exhibit variable selectively for both purine and pyrimidine nucleosides. The recent cloning of N1 and N2 nucleoside transporters has provided the first information on the molecular function and structure of concentrative nucleoside transporters. In this manuscript we review the characteristics of the various subtypes of nucleoside transporters and the molecular structure, functional properties, and tissue distribution of the cloned Na(+)-dependent nucleoside transporters. In addition, the interactions of nucleosides and nucleoside analogs with the cloned transporters in mammalian and amphibian expression systems are presented. Mammalian expression systems may be particularly useful during drug development in screening potential compounds for improved bioavailability and tissue specific targeting. Finally, we present our view of future ares of study in the field of nucleoside transporters.
Previous studies of nucleoside transport in mammalian cells have identified two types of activities: the equilibrative nucleoside transporters and concentrative, Na+-nucleoside cotransporters. Characterization of the concentrative nucleoside transporters has been hampered by the presence in most cells and tissues of multiple transporters with overlapping permeant specificities. With the recent cloning of cDNAs encoding rat and human members of the concentrative nucleoside transporter (CNT) family, it is now possible to study the concentrative transporters in isolation by use of functional expression systems. We report here the isolation of a nucleoside transport-deficient subline of L1210 mouse leukemia (L1210/DNC3) that is a suitable recipient for stable expression of cloned nucleoside transporter cDNAs. We have used L1210/DNC3 as the recipient in gene transfer studies to develop a stable cell line (L1210/DU5) that produces the recombinant concentrative nucleoside transporter with selectivity for pyrimidine nucleosides (CNT1) that was initially identified in rat intestine (Q.Q. Huang, S.Y. Yao, M.W. Ritzel, A.R.P. Paterson, C.E. Cass, and J.D. Young. 1994. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 17,757-17,760). L1210/DU5 was used to examine the permeant selectivity of recombinant rat CNT1 by comparing a series of nucleoside analogs with respect to (i) inhibition of inward fluxes of [3H]thymidine, (ii) initial rates of transport of 3H-analog, and (iii) cytotoxicity to L1210/DU5 versus the parental transport-deficient cell line. By all three criteria, recombinant CNT1 transported 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine and 5-fluorouridine well and cytosine arabinoside poorly. Although some purine nucleosides (2'-deoxyadenosinedeoxyadeno-2'-deoxyadenosine, 7-deazaadenosine) were potent inhibitors of CNT1, they were poor permeants when uptake was measured directly by analysis of isotopic fluxes or indirectly by comparison of cytotoxicity ratios. We conclude that comparison of analog cytotoxicity to L1210/DU5 versus L1210/DNC3 is a reliable indirect predictor of transportability, suggesting that cytotoxicity assays with a panel of such cell lines, each with a different recombinant nucleoside transporter, would be a valuable tool in the development of antiviral and antitumor nucleoside analogs.
Nucleosides and nucleoside analogs are actively transported in the human kidney. With the recent cloning of a purine-selective, Na+-dependent, nucleoside transporter (hSPNT1, also termed hCNT2) from human kidney, it is now possible to study the interaction of nucleosides and nucleoside analogs with this transport protein and gain a more detailed knowledge of the underlying mechanisms of nucleoside transport in the human kidney. In this study we examined the substrate selectivity of hSPNT1 for nucleosides and nucleoside analogs. We determined that the naturally occurring nucleosides adenosine, inosine, and uridine are substrates for this carrier, whereas thymidine is not. The nucleoside analogs (0.5 mM) 2', 3'-dideoxyadenosine; 2',3'-dideoxyinosine; and 2-chloro-2'deoxyadenosine (2CdA), significantly inhibited the uptake of [3H]inosine in HeLa cells transiently transfected with hSPNT1. However, there was no significant Na+-dependent uptake of [3H]2', 3'-dideoxyinosine or [3H]2CdA in the transfected cells, suggesting that these nucleoside analogs are not permeants of hSPNT1. Interestingly, 2CdA was considerably less potent in inhibiting [3H]inosine uptake in HeLa cells expressing hSPNT1 than in cells expressing the rat homolog rSPNT (IC50 = 371 microM versus 13.8 microM), suggesting that there may be notable species differences in the kinetic interactions of some nucleoside analogs with purine- selective nucleoside transporters.
The molecular cloning of cDNAs encoding nucleoside transporter proteins has greatly advanced understanding of how nucleoside permeants are translocated across cell membranes. The nucleoside transporter proteins identified thus far have been categorized into five distinct superfamilies. Two of these superfamilies, the equilibrative and concentrative nucleoside transporters, have human members and these will be examined in depth in this review. The human equilibrative nucleoside transporters translocate nucleosides and nucleobases bidirectionally down their concentration gradients and are important in the uptake of anticancer and antiviral nucleoside drugs. The human concentrative nucleoside transporters cotranslocate nucleosides and sodium unidirectionally against the nucleoside concentration gradients and play a vital role in certain tissues. The regulation of nucleoside and nucleobase transporters is being studied more intensely now that more tools are available. This review provides an overview of recent advances in the molecular biology and regulation of the nucleoside and nucleobase transporters.
Nucleoside transporters mediate cellular uptake of physiologic nucleosides for nucleic acid synthesis in the salvage pathways in many cell types. These transporters also play an important role in in vivo disposition and intracellular targeting of many nucleoside analogs used in anticancer and antiviral drug therapy. In mammalian cells, there are two major nucleoside transporter gene families: the equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENTs) and the concentrative nucleoside transporters (CNTs). The ENTs are facilitated carrier proteins and the CNTs are Na(+)-dependent secondary active transporters. Recent molecular cloning of a number of ENT and CNT transporters has greatly advanced our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms by which nucleosides and nucleoside analogs are transported across biological membranes. In this manuscript, we review the structure, function, tissue distribution, and cellular localization of various cloned mammalian nucleoside transporters. Information on transporter interaction with various nucleoside drugs and analogs is presented. Current knowledge on the regulation of nucleoside transporters in various cell types and tissues is reviewed. The therapeutic significance of nucleoside transporters is discussed along with emerging data from recent clinical studies.
1. A nonspecific nucleoside phosphotransferase (nucleotide : 3'-deoxynucleotide 5'-phosphotransferase, EC 2.7.1.77), purified from chick embryos, catalyzes the transfer of phosphate ester from a nucleotide donor to a nucleoside acceptor. 2. The enzyme exhibits sigmoidal kinetics with respect to nucleoside monophosphate donors, but with respect to nucleoside di- or triphosphate donors and nucleoside acceptors hyperbolic kinetics were obtained. 3. The nucleoside phosphotransferase of chick embryo is unstable to heat and is protected from inactivation by a large number of nucleosides. 4. Nucleoside di- and triphosphates lower both the concentration of nucleoside monophosphates required for half-maximal velocity and the kinetic order of reaction measured with these phosphate donors. On the contrary, nucleoside di- or triphosphate do not modify the kinetic parameters evaluated for nucleoside acceptors. 5. We suggest that the nucleoside phosphotransferase contains both substrate and regulatory sites. It seems that the free apoenzyme is converted, by means of cooperative interactions between regulatory sites, into an enzyme-nucleotide complex, which is particularly stable at 37 degrees C.
The present study aimed at elucidating the mechanisms of nucleoside transport in primary cultured rabbit tracheal epithelial cells (RTEC) grown on a permeable filter support. Uptake of (3)H-uridine, the model nucleoside substrate, from the apical fluid of primary cultured RTEC was examined with respect to its dependence on Na(+), substrate concentration, temperature and its sensitivity to inhibitors, other nucleosides and antiviral nucleoside analogs. Apical (3)H-uridine uptake in primary cultured RTEC was strongly dependent on an inward Na(+) gradient and temperature. Ten micromolar nitro-benzyl-mercapto-purine-ribose (NBMPR) (an inhibitor of es-type nucleoside transport in the nanomolar range) did not further inhibit this process. (3)H-uridine uptake from apical fluid was inhibited by basolateral ouabain (10 microM) and apical phloridzin (100 microM), indicating that uptake may involve a secondary active transport process. Uridine uptake was saturable with a K(m) of 3.4 +/- 1.8 microM and the V(max) of 24.3 +/- 5.2 pmoles/mg protein/30 s. Inhibition studies indicated that nucleoside analogs that have a substitution on the nucleobase competed with uridine uptake from apical fluid, but those with modifications on the ribose sugar including acyclic analogs were ineffective. The pattern of inhibition of apical (3)H-uridine, (3)H-inosine and (3)H-thymidine uptake into RTEC cells by physiological nucleosides was consistent with multiple systems: A pyrimidine-selective transport system (CNT1); a broad nucleoside substrate transport system that excludes inosine (CNT4) and an equilibrative NBMPR-insensitive nucleoside transport system (ei type). These results indicate that the presence of apically located nucleoside transporters in the epithelial cells lining the upper respiratory tract can lead to a high accumulation of nucleosides in the trachea. At least one Na(+)-dependent, secondary, active transport process may mediate the apical absorption of nucleosides or analogous molecules.
The SLC28 family consists of three subtypes of sodium-dependent, concentrative nucleoside transporters, CNT1, CNT2, and CNT3 (SLC28A1, SLC28A2, and SLC28A3, respectively), that transport both naturally occurring nucleosides and synthetic nucleoside analogs used in the treatment of various diseases. These subtypes differ in their substrate specificities: CNT1 is pyrimidine-nucleoside preferring, CNT2 is purine-nucleoside preferring, and CNT3 transports both pyrimidine and purine nucleosides. Recent studies have identified key amino acid residues that are determinants of pyrimidine and purine specificity of CNT1 and CNT2. The tissue distributions of the CNTs vary: CNT1 is localized primarily in epithelia, whereas CNT2 and CNT3 have more generalized distributions. Nucleoside transporters in the SLC28 and SLC29 families play critical roles in nucleoside salvage pathways where they mediate the first step of nucleotide biosynthesis. In addition, these transporters work in concert to terminate adenosine signaling. SLC28 family members are crucial determinants of response to a variety of anticancer and antiviral nucleoside analogs, as they modulate the entry of these analogs into target tissues. Further, this family is involved in the absorption and disposition of many nucleoside analogs. Several CNT single nucleoside polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified, but have yet to be characterized.
We have shown previously that the human jejunal brush border membrane expresses both the N1 (cif) and the N2 (cit) Na+-dependent (concentrative) nucleoside transporters but not the Na+-independent (facilitative) nitrobenzylmercaptopurineriboside (NBMPR)-sensitive (es) transporter (Patil SD and Unadkat JD, Am J Physiol, 272: 1314-1320, 1997). In the present study, we have demonstrated that when Xenopus laevis oocytes are microinjected with human jejunal mRNA, four nucleoside transporters are expressed simultaneously, namely the N1 and N2 Na+-dependent nucleoside transporters and the es and the NBMPR-insensitive (ei) Na+-independent transporters. The expressed Na+-dependent nucleoside transporters showed substrate specificity identical to that previously described by us using jejunal brush border membrane vesicles (Patil SD and Unadkat JD, Am J Physiol, 272: 1314-1320, 1997). The expressed es and ei Na+-independent transporters demonstrated broad substrate selectivity with both purines and pyrimidines capable of inhibiting the uptake of guanosine and thymidine mediated by this transporter. The expressed Na+-dependent nucleoside transporters mediated the transport of their respective nucleoside substrates with a high affinity and a low capacity, whereas the es and the ei transporters mediated the transport of nucleosides with a low affinity and a high capacity. Collectively, these observations suggest that the Na+-independent nucleoside transporters are expressed in the basolateral membrane of the human jejunal epithelium. Based on these data, we hypothesize that the concentrative transporters in the brush border membrane and equilibrative transporters in the basolateral membrane are arranged in series in the human jejunal epithelium to allow efficient vectorial transport of nucleosides from the lumen to the blood. The simultaneous expression of four nucleoside transporters in X. laevis oocytes establishes a basis for molecular cloning of these four human nucleoside transporters.
Ribose phosphates are either synthesized through the oxidative branch of the pentose phosphate pathway, or are supplied by nucleoside phosphorylases. The two main pentose phosphates, ribose-5-phosphate and ribose-1-phosphate, are readily interconverted by the action of phosphopentomutase. Ribose-5-phosphate is the direct precursor of 5-phosphoribosyl-1-pyrophosphate, for both de novo and 'salvage' synthesis of nucleotides. Phosphorolysis of deoxyribonucleosides is the main source of deoxyribose phosphates, which are interconvertible, through the action of phosphopentomutase. The pentose moiety of all nucleosides can serve as a carbon and energy source. During the past decade, extensive advances have been made in elucidating the pathways by which the pentose phosphates, arising from nucleoside phosphorolysis, are either recycled, without opening of their furanosidic ring, or catabolized as a carbon and energy source. We review herein the experimental knowledge on the molecular mechanisms by which (a) ribose-1-phosphate, produced by purine nucleoside phosphorylase acting catabolically, is either anabolized for pyrimidine salvage and 5-fluorouracil activation, with uridine phosphorylase acting anabolically, or recycled for nucleoside and base interconversion; (b) the nucleosides can be regarded, both in bacteria and in eukaryotic cells, as carriers of sugars, that are made available though the action of nucleoside phosphorylases. In bacteria, catabolism of nucleosides, when suitable carbon and energy sources are not available, is accomplished by a battery of nucleoside transporters and of inducible catabolic enzymes for purine and pyrimidine nucleosides and for pentose phosphates. In eukaryotic cells, the modulation of pentose phosphate production by nucleoside catabolism seems to be affected by developmental and physiological factors on enzyme levels.