Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Genetic code”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28Linked to original sources

Evolution of eukaryotic translation elongation and termination factors: variations of evolutionary rate and genetic code deviations.

Translation is carried out by the ribosome and several associated protein factors through three consecutive steps: initiation, elongation, and termination. Termination remains the least understood of them, partly because of the nonuniversality of the factors involved. To get some insights on the evolution of eukaryotic translation termination, we have compared the phylogeny of the release factors eRF1 and eRF3 to that of the elongation factors EF-1alpha and EF-2, with special focus on ciliates. Our results show that these four translation proteins have experienced different modes of evolution. This is especially evident for the EF-1alpha, EF-2, and eRF1 ciliate sequences. Ciliates appear as monophyletic in the EF-2 phylogenetic tree but not in the EF-1alpha and eRF1 phylogenetic trees. This seems to be mainly because of phylogeny reconstruction artifacts (the long-branch attraction) produced by the acceleration of evolutionary rate of ciliate EF-1alpha and eRF1 sequences. Interaction with the highly divergent actin found in ciliates, or on the contrary, loss of interaction, could explain the acceleration of the evolutionary rate of the EF-1alpha sequences. In the case of ciliate eRF1 sequences, their unusually high evolutionary rate may be related to the deviations in the genetic code usage found in diverse ciliates. These deviations involve a relaxation (or even abolition) of the recognition of one or two stop codons by eRF1. To achieve this, structural changes in eRF1 are needed, and this may affect its evolutionary rate. Eukaryotic translation seems to have followed a mosaic evolution, with its different elements governed by different selective pressures. However, a correlation analysis shows that, beneath the disagreement shown by the different translation proteins, their concerted evolution can still be made apparent when they are compared with other proteins that are not involved in translation.

Animals↗

An expanding genetic code.

A general method was recently developed that makes it possible to genetically encode unnatural amino acids (UAAs) with diverse physical, chemical or biological properties in Escherichia coli, yeast, and mammalian cells. Over 30 UAAs have been cotranslationally incorporated into proteins with high fidelity and efficiency by means of a unique codon and corresponding tRNA-synthetase pair. A key feature of this methodology is the orthogonality between the new translational components and their endogenous host counterparts. Specifically, the codon for the UAA should not encode a common amino acid; neither the new tRNA nor cognate aminoacyl tRNA synthetase should cross-react with any endogenous tRNA-synthetase pairs; and the new synthetase should recognize only the UAA and not any of the 20 common amino acids. This methodology provides a powerful tool for exploring protein structure and function both in vitro and in vivo, as well as generating proteins with new or enhanced properties.

Amino Acids↗

Cracking the auditory genetic code: part II. Syndromic hereditary hearing impairment.

OBJECTIVE: The application of molecular genetic techniques to the study of hereditary hearing impairment has contributed significantly to our understanding of auditory physiology and disease processes. This article reviews the current state of our knowledge regarding the genes associated with syndromic hereditary hearing impairment. DATA SOURCES: Data were obtained from the Medline database and the internet. STUDY SELECTION: Articles relevant to genetics of syndromic deafness were selected. DATA EXTRACTION: Data pertaining to phenotypes, location of genes, identification of genes, and implications for hearing were extracted. CONCLUSION: Significant progress has been made in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of deafness.

Gene Expression↗

Expanding the genetic code.

Recently, a general method was developed that makes it possible to genetically encode unnatural amino acids with diverse physical, chemical, or biological properties in Escherichia coli, yeast, and mammalian cells. More than 30 unnatural amino acids have been incorporated into proteins with high fidelity and efficiency by means of a unique codon and corresponding tRNA/aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase pair. These include fluorescent, glycosylated, metal-ion-binding, and redox-active amino acids, as well as amino acids with unique chemical and photochemical reactivity. This methodology provides a powerful tool both for exploring protein structure and function in vitro and in vivo and for generating proteins with new or enhanced properties.

Amino Acid Substitution↗