Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “General Practitioners”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28Linked to original sources
PubMed1989

General practitioner involvement in non-procedural medicine in public hospitals in Melbourne, Australia.

This study is a survey of general practitioners practising in an area in Melbourne, Australia, where there are two medium sized public hospitals with limited general practitioner admitting rights. A questionnaire was mailed to the 207 general practitioners practising in the study area; 167 (81%) responded. Seventy one per cent of respondents had public hospital admitting rights and 73% aimed to manage as many medical patients in hospital as possible. The main reasons given for such involvement were patient expectation, professional satisfaction and the benefits to patients, beyond that of reassurance, which followed from continuity of care. About half of respondents (52%) agreed that their role was a liaison or coordinating one alongside hospital specialists. Fifty-four per cent of respondents overall had in fact managed at least two medical patients in public hospitals in the past 12 months. Lack of availability of general practitioner beds and specialist dominance in public hospitals rather than inadequate time or remuneration were perceived to be the main barriers to hospital practice. Almost three-quarters of respondents (72%) believed general practitioners would be excluded from public hospitals in the foreseeable future. They blamed specialist dominance and general practitioner apathy equally for this predicted state of affairs. A debate on the desirability or otherwise of such an exclusion is overdue within the medical community in order to consider what will otherwise be a fait accompli.

Australia↗
PubMed1992

Attitudes towards and use of general practitioner services among homosexual men with HIV infection or AIDS.

In a study of 263 homosexual men positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), it was found that 87% were registered with a general practitioner and of these, 55% said that the general practitioner knew their HIV status. Of the 104 men who had experienced symptoms, 39% had consulted the general practitioner for HIV-related advice. A total of 49% of those who were not registered used a specialist outpatient clinic for all their medical needs. Of those who were registered and whose general practitioner was aware of their HIV status but who did not consult their doctor, 72% used a specialist outpatient clinic. Reasons for not consulting the general practitioner included fears of breach of confidentiality and lack of confidence in the general practitioner's understanding of HIV. Fifteen per cent of the sample continued to see a general practitioner who was unaware of their HIV status, for non-HIV related advice. The needs of patients must be taken into account when planning more integrated hospital and community care for those with HIV infection or the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS).

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1985

Old people not known to the general practitioner: low risk group.

The elderly patients in a large general practice aged 75 and over who lived at home (n = 877) were divided into two groups according to the general practitioner's knowledge of their risk status and were designated "risk status known" (n = 679) and "risk status not known" (n = 198). Forty-three high risk patients in the risk status known group had a functional disability score and experience of mortality that was not dissimilar to those of elderly people in institutions. The medical and social characteristics of a random sample (n = 150) of the risk status known group, after excluding the high risk patients, were compared with the risk status not known group using a Barber Wallis questionnaire. A response rate of 90% was achieved from both groups and a cumulative risk score was calculated by totalling unfavourable replies to the questions. The risk status not known group, which comprised 14% of the patients who lived at home after correcting for the number who had died and moved, had appreciably less contact with the general practitioners, had an appreciably lower cumulative risk score, were confined at home less because of ill health, were less concerned about their health, and were less in need of nursing attention. The findings of this study suggest that the elderly patients who are not known to their general practitioners are in relatively good health when compared with the patients that the general practitioner knows well.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

General practitioners and completeness of cancer registry.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of the general practitioner as a source of information for a cancer registry. DESIGN: The study involved a random sample of respondents to a letter inviting participation which was sent to all general practitioners in a specific area. Participating doctors were visited to maximise cooperation. Data collection consisted of setting up a retrospective (prevalence) registry of cancer patients diagnosed over a 20 month period, and a prospective (incidence) register over a subsequent 12 month period. The general practitioner cancer file was then linked to the total cancer registry data base to estimate missed cases. SETTING: The study took place in the catchment area of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre Middle-Netherlands (IKMN). PARTICIPANTS: Of 448 general practitioners in the IKMN region, 152 were willing to participate and of these 52 were randomly selected to take part (11% of all general practitioners in the region). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 1637 tumours were identified from the general practitioners, of which 252 (15.4%) were not included in the cancer registry. Of these, only 22 (1.3%) were not included in the registry because they had tumours diagnosed clinically in outpatients and therefore had been omitted from the usual sources of information available to the cancer registry (pathology reports, hospital discharge letters). The missed cases were mostly older patients with digestive tract tumours. CONCLUSIONS: On cost-benefit grounds it was not considered feasible to initiate an active cancer registration system among general practitioners, provided that notification of pathological examinations to the registry is complete. Limited under-registration will occur when death certificates cannot be used as an additional source of information.

Catchment Area, Health↗
PubMed2005

[Summary of the practice guideline 'CVA' from the Dutch College of General Practitioners].

The practice guideline 'CVA' from the Dutch College of General Practitioners provides guidelines for the management of stroke patients. The guideline is in agreement with the changing insights about the benefits of stroke-units and thrombolysis. The most important recommendations are the following. In the acute phase, most patients with a cerebrovascular accident should be referred for admission to a stroke-unit. Exceptions are patients with only slight neurological disability and patients with severe comorbidity. Patients with a CVA that started less than three hours ago should be referred for emergency thrombolytic therapy in regions where this possibility exists. In situations in which the general practitioner considers a home visit to involve an unacceptable loss of time, he may decide to refer on the basis of the results of the 'face-arm-speech-time' (FAST) test, which can be administered by telephone. For patients that remain at home, the general practitioner sees to the early start of a rehabilitation programme, and takes the initiative if necessary. The general practitioner can support stroke patients with permanent neurological deficits by considering them to be chronically ill patients requiring regular check-ups.

Emergency Medical Services↗
PubMed1986

Findings of a national survey of the role of general practitioners in the treatment of opiate misuse: dealing with the opiate misuser.

Because there has been a substantial increase in the scale of drug misuse general practitioners have become increasingly concerned in responding to this problem. Little is known, however, about how general practitioners manage drug misusers. The findings from a national survey carried out in mid-1985 of a 5% random sample of general practitioners in England and Wales show the extent to which various actions were undertaken by general practitioners who reported on the consultation with the opiate misuser whom they last attended. In more than half of the cases the opiate misuser had been under the care of the general practitioners for this problem for at least six months. The findings indicate that most general practitioners refer these patients to specialist drug dependence clinics or to general psychiatric services but rarely to other agencies. Opiate drugs had been prescribed in nearly a third of cases. The rate of notification to the Home Office conforms with that in other studies and indicates a high degree of undernotification. More detailed study of general practitioners' activities in managing drug misusers is needed.

Drug Prescriptions↗
PubMed1999

General practitioners' training for, interest in, and knowledge of sports medicine and its organisations.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the training and interest of a group of general practitioners in the area of sport and exercise medicine, and the organisations representing the specialty. DESIGN: A postal questionnaire using a Likert scale in a previously piloted set of questions. SUBJECTS: 275 general practitioners registered with the Northampton Regional Health Authority. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Responses to questions designed to assess training and interest in sport and exercise medicine. RESULTS: A response rate of 87.6% was achieved. It was found that 72.7% of the responding general practitioners felt inadequately trained to practice sport and exercise medicine. Some 76.0% would welcome more training and 36.4% felt that their undergraduate orthopaedic training was of no use in primary care. Many (63.6%) of the general practitioners believed that the current NHS cannot sustain sport and exercise medicine, and there was uncertainty as to whether it is currently a recognised specialty, although 60.4% felt that it should be. General practitioners listed lack of facilities (53.1%), lack of training (42.9%), and lack of time (38.2%) as the main problems in practicing sport and exercise medicine in primary care within the current NHS. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners feel undertrained in sport and exercise medicine at both undergraduate and post-graduate level; they have a perceived need for more training and show an interest in the subject. There is scope for improving the value of undergraduate orthopaedic training. General practitioners wish to see sport and exercise medicine recognised as an NHS specialty but fear that this is not sustainable under current conditions. There is confusion among general practitioners about the current sport and exercise medicine organisations.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

A survey of open-access endoscopy in primary health care centres: outcome of gastric carcinoma patients diagnosed by general practitioners compared with hospital-referred endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: We examined open-access endoscopy service based on general practitioner endoscopists. METHODS: We compared the survival of the gastric carcinoma patients originally diagnosed in health care centres by general practitioner endoscopists and hospital outpatient clinic by specialists. RESULTS: A total of 159 gastric carcinoma cases diagnosed during 1996-2000 were included in to the present study. Of them, 58% (N = 92) and 42% (N = 67) were detected by general practitioners and specialists, respectively. We observed no difference in the mean age of patients (71.3 years versus 71.4 years, p = 0.97) and stage of tumours [15% (N = 14) versus 21% localised tumours (N = 14, p = 0.30)] between cases diagnosed by general practitioners and specialists. The number of patients who underwent radical extirpation were 14% (N = 13) and 19% (N = 13, p = 0.38), respectively. After a minimum follow-up of 3.5 years, 29 patients (18%) were alive. The mean survival time of hospital-diagnosed carcinoma patients was longer (23.6 months versus 18.7 months, p = 0.23). Eight patients had undergone hospital-referred gastroscopy less than 3 years before cancer diagnosis. In multivariate analysis, radical extirpation of carcinoma (odds ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.28) predicted survival; whereas age (odds ratio 1.03 per year, 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.07 per year), female sex (odds ratio 1.785, 95% confidence interval 0.71-4.81) and the open-access endoscopy based on general practitioner endoscopists (odds ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 0.60-3.65) predicted neither survival nor carcinoma-related death. CONCLUSION: No significant difference was detected in the outcome of gastric cancer patients diagnosed in primary care centres by general practitioner endoscopists and in hospital outpatient clinic by specialists.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

[Perspective of a patient in the general practitioners office and in the dental office].

Both general practitioners and dentists acknowledge the importance of the patient's perspective and the demand for care, and, consequently, of good communication with their patients. In general practice, the concept of reason for encounter has proved to be very useful for gaining more insight in the nature and the importance of the patient's perspective. Data from the Amsterdam Transition project show that the general practitioner understands the patient's reasons for encounters very well, and that the nature of the patient's reasons for encounter clearly affect the subsequent interventions. In this article, 260 letters concerning people's experiences with their dentist are used in order to provide an impression of communication problems in dentist practice in the Netherlands. Three major problem areas are identified, with a total of ten subcategories. Several of these are well known to the general practitioner as well. In addition, some problems are characteristic for the dentist practice. It is suggested to incorporate the concept of reason for encounter in dental care as an essential part of the description and analysis of the communication between dentists and their patients.

Communication↗
PubMed1986

General practitioners' retirement plans and what influences them.

The results of a study of the attitudes of 197 general practitioners aged 55 and over towards retirement and their plans for retirement are reported. Few wished to retire very early, and only a further 40% definitely planned a clean break from practice. Nearly half planned on taking "24 hour retirement," even though most (78%) will be entitled to full pension rights. Job satisfaction and health were the most important factors influencing the timing of the retirement. Seventy seven per cent thought that there should be no formal retirement policy, 79% wanted no compulsory retirement age, and 80% wanted no further controls or safeguards directed at older practising general practitioners. Half of the general practitioners in the sample were not looking forward to retirement. Personal discussions with respondents aged 65 and over suggested that there are many older general practitioners who plan to practise for some time, who feel that they will know when the time has come to stop, but who often express the hope that they may "die in harness." A large proportion of older doctors are in single-handed practice. In view of this, and also of the evidence from North America which suggests that older doctors may practise inferior medicine, it is thought that the ability of such general practitioners to evaluate their competence should be studied by methods such as peer assessment techniques.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2005

The factors associated to psychosocial stress among general practitioners in Lithuania. Cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: There are number of studies showing that general practice is one of the most stressful workplace among health care workers. Since Baltic States regained independence in 1990, the reform of the health care system took place in which new role and more responsibilities were allocated to general practitioners' in Lithuania. This study aimed to explore the psychosocial stress level among Lithuanian general practitioner's and examine the relationship between psychosocial stress and work characteristics. METHODS: The cross-sectional study of 300 Lithuanian General practitioners. Psychosocial stress was investigated with a questionnaire based on the Reeder scale. Job demands were investigated with the R. Karasek scale. The analysis included descriptive statistics; interrelationship analysis between characteristics and multivariate logistic regression to estimate odds ratios for each of the independent variables in the model. RESULTS: Response rate 66% (N = 197). Our study highlighted highest prevalence of psychosocial stress among widowed, single and female general practitioners. Lowest prevalence of psychosocial stress was among males and older age general practitioners. Psychosocial stress occurs when job demands are high and job decision latitude is low (chi2 = 18,9; p < 0,01). The multivariate analysis shows that high job demands (OR 4,128; CI 2,102-8,104; p < 0,001), patient load more than 18 patients per day (OR 5,863; CI 1,549-22,188; p < 0,01) and young age of GP's (OR 6,874; CI 1,292-36,582; p < 0,05) can be assigned as significant predictors for psychosocial stress. CONCLUSION: One half of respondents suffering from work related psychosocial stress. High psychological workload demands combined with low decision latitude has the greatest impact to stress caseness among GP's. High job demands, high patient load and young age of GP's can be assigned as significant predictors of psychosocial stress among GP's.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Should obstetricians see women with normal pregnancies? A multicentre randomised controlled trial of routine antenatal care by general practitioners and midwives compared with shared care led by obstetricians.

OBJECTIVE: To compare routine antenatal care provided by general practitioners and midwives with obstetrician led shared care. DESIGN: Multicentre randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 51 general practices linked to nine Scottish maternity hospitals. SUBJECTS: 1765 women at low risk of antenatal complications. INTERVENTION: Routine antenatal care by general practitioners and midwives according to a care plan and protocols for managing complications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparisons of health service use, indicators of quality of care, and women's satisfaction. RESULTS: Continuity of care was improved for the general practitioner and midwife group as the number of carers was less (median 5 carers v 7 for shared care group, P<0.0001) and the number of routine visits reduced (10.9 v 11.7, P<0.0001). Fewer women in the general practitioner and midwife group had antenatal admissions (27% (222/834) v 32% (266/840), P<0.05), non-attendances (7% (57) v 11% (89), P<0.01) and daycare (12% (102) v 7% (139), P<0.05) but more were referred (49% (406) v 36% (305), P<0.0001). Rates of antenatal diagnoses did not differ except that fewer women in the general practitioner and midwife group had hypertensive disorders (pregnancy induced hypertension, 5% (37) v 8% (70), P<0.01) and fewer had labour induced (18% (149) v 24% (201), P<0.01). Few failures to comply with the care protocol occurred, but more Rhesus negative women in the general practitioner and midwife group did not have an appropriate antibody check (2.5% (20) v 0.4% (3), P<0.0001). Both groups expressed high satisfaction with care (68% (453/663) v 65% (430/656), P=0.5) and acceptability of allocated style of care (93% (618) v 94% (624), P=0.6). Access to hospital support before labour was similar (45% (302) v 48% (312) visited labour rooms before giving birth, P=0.6). CONCLUSION: Routine specialist visits for women initially at low risk of pregnancy complications offer little or no clinical or consumer benefit.

Clinical Protocols↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of the efficiency of diagnosis of early cervical carcinoma by general practitioners and cytology screening programs in the Netherlands.

The efficiency of general practitioners and cytology screening programs in the Netherlands in diagnosing neoplasia by means of cervical cytology was investigated. For all age groups of women living in rural or urban areas, the general practitioners were almost twice as successful in detecting cases of cervical neoplasia. No reason could be found why the general practitioners were relatively more successful. The important role of the general practitioner and his or her ability to encourage the high-risk group of women to have early and regular smears is stressed.

Adult↗
PubMed1974

Use of radiological facilities by general practitioners.

The 11,360 direct referrals to diagnostic radiological facilities by general practitioners in the Aberdeen area during 1973 were studied. These represented about 12% of the adult radiology performed in the main x-ray departments of the city, and barium meal examinations amounted to half of all such outpatient contrast examinations. Chest x-ray and barium meal examinations were the most frequently used procedures.Some abnormality was detected at 34% of all examinations, and the barium meal examinations requested by general practitioners showed a similar percentage of abnormal findings to those requested by Aberdeen hospital doctors.The average referral rate for all practices was 24.6 per 1,000 practice population per year. Singlehanded general practitioners referred fewer patients for diagnostic radiology than those working in group practices, and rural practitioners referred fewer than urban general practitioners. This trend was emphasized at a distance greater than 15 miles from the city.

Bone Diseases↗
PubMed1989

General practitioners' continuing medical education within and outside their practice.

To study continuing medical education 96 out of 101 general practitioners chosen at random from the list held by a family practitioner committee were interviewed. The results provided little evidence of regular attendance at local postgraduate centre meetings, though practice based educational meetings were common. Thirty one of the general practitioners worked in practices that held one or more practice based educational meetings each month at which the doctors provided the main educational content. Performance review was undertaken in the practices of 51 of the general practitioners, and 80 of the doctors recognised its value. The general practitioners considered that the most valuable educational activities occurred within the practice, the most valued being contact with partners. They asked for increased contact with hospital doctors. The development of general practitioners' continuing medical education should be based on the content of the individual general practitioner's day to day work and entail contact with his or her professional colleagues.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed1989

The Worcester development project: general practitioner satisfaction with a new community psychiatric service.

General practitioners in the Worcester development project area were interviewed about their experience of using the new community based psychiatric services. Of those who remembered the previous asylum based services most thought the new services were an improvement in many respects and were satisfied with the care provided for their patients. However, there were difficulties in obtaining emergency admissions, and criticisms of the social work service being slow to respond to requests for help. General dissatisfaction was expressed about feedback, particularly from the community psychiatric nursing service. General practitioners are expected to have a key role in the coordination of community services. However, most general practitioners interviewed had no particular interest or training in psychiatry. This, coupled with the inadequate information they received and the possibility of their workload increasing as more patients move out of hospital, raises questions about how they may be helped to fulfil this coordinating role in community psychiatric services.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1996

Factors predicting differences among general practitioners in test ordering behaviour and in the response to feedback on test requests.

BACKGROUND: In a population of 85 general practitioners diagnostic test ordering behaviour has been changed by means of repeated individual feedback provided since 1985. OBJECTIVES: We studied practitioner and practice characteristics which may explain differences in test ordering behaviour and in the extent to which general practitioners tend to change their behaviour according to the feedback. METHOD: In order to trace such variables, 75 general practitioners were interviewed. In our study request data from individual general practitioners were related to data from several questionnaires. RESULTS: We found no practice characteristics which were of influence on the number of test requests by the general practitioner. Explanatory practitioner characteristics for this were found to be years of experience and working hours per week in practice. CONCLUSIONS: More years of experience as a general practitioner and a shorter duration of consultations correlated with a better response to advice given in the feedback.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

General practitioners' views on quality specifications for "outpatient referrals and care contracts".

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain general practitioners' views about which quality specifications should be included in contracts for hospital care. DESIGN: In depth interview study and postal survey. SETTING: General practitioners in City and Hackney Health District. SUBJECTS: Fourteen doctors were interviewed in depth; 77 of 131 doctors (59%) returned postal questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Rating of listed quality specifications. RESULTS: The most popular items which doctors thought should be included in contracts by April 1991 related to the availability of patients' notes in outpatient clinics, respect shown to general practitioners in telephone communications with hospital doctors, supply of medicines after discharge, patient management plans for general practitioners, the earlier arrival of discharge slips, the type of hospital doctor to see new outpatients, and the unnecessary duplication of investigations. CONCLUSIONS: A high premium was attached by general practitioners to effective organisation, effective communication between primary and secondary sources of care, and effective communication with patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗