Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 505 records · Page 28Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

Normal McCollough effect in Alzheimer's disease and global amnesia.

The McCollough effect (ME), a long-lasting, pattern-contingent aftereffect in normal human vision, was examined in persons with known deficits in memory. We induced MEs in 11 subjects, 5 patients with various severities of Alzheimer's disease (AD), H.M. (a patient who has global amnesia due to bilateral medial temporal lobectomy and who has been studied for 35 years since his operation), and 5 control subjects. H.M. and the AD patients showed MEs of strength and duration comparable to those of the control subjects. These results demonstrate a dissociation between learning mechanisms that mediate recall and recognition versus mechanisms that mediate the ME. Furthermore, knowledge about the sites of neuropathology in H.M. and in AD are consistent with other sources of evidence implicating early visual areas, especially V1, as a critical locus of the ME.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Velocity dependence of the interocular transfer of dynamic motion aftereffects.

It is well established that motion aftereffects (MAEs) can show interocular transfer (IOT); that is, motion adaptation in one eye can give a MAE in the other eye. Different quantification methods and different test stimuli have been shown to give different IOT magnitudes, varying from no to almost full IOT. In this study, we examine to what extent IOT of the dynamic MAE (dMAE), that is the MAE seen with a dynamic noise test pattern, varies with velocity of the adaptation stimulus. We measured strength of dMAE by a nulling method. The aftereffect induced by adaptation to a moving random-pixel array was compensated (nulled), during a brief dynamic test period, by the same kind of motion stimulus of variable luminance signal-to-noise ratio (LSNR). The LSNR nulling value was determined in a Quest-staircase procedure. We found that velocity has a strong effect on the magnitude of IOT for the dMAE. For increasing speeds from 1.5 deg s(-1) to 24 deg s(-1) average IOT values increased about linearly from 18% to 63% or from 32% to 83%, depending on IOT definition. The finding that dMAEs transfer to an increasing extent as speed increases, suggests that binocular cells play a more dominant role at higher speeds.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1987

Relationship between differentiation and integration of self and nonself: an investigation in terms of modes of perceptual adaptation.

Differentiation and integration of self- and nonself-aspects of perception were investigated as features of the process of adapting to a spiral aftereffect (SAE) induced with massed trials. The cessation of the SAE at each trial was assumed to indicate that self-aspects of perception had been differentiated from nonself-aspects, changes in SAE duration over trials being considered to represent the integration of these aspects. Degree and stability of self-nonself-differentiation, reflected in the level and persistence of field-dependence measured on a serial version of the Rod and Frame Test, varied between individuals (N = 129). The results suggest that persistent field-independence requires both self- and nonself-aspects of perception to be adequately and continuously represented in an integrative process which is oriented towards stimulus-proximity, self-aspects of perception being successively replaced by nonself-aspects.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1995

Attentional modulation of adaptation to two-component transparent motion.

We have studied the effects of voluntary attention on the induction of motion aftereffects (MAEs). While adapting, observers paid attention to one of two transparently displayed random dot patterns, moving concurrently in opposite directions. Selective attention was found to modulate the susceptibility to motion adaptation very substantially. To measure the strength of the induced MAEs we modulated the signal-to-noise ratio of a real motion signal in a random dot pattern that was used to balance the aftereffect. Results obtained for adapting to single motion vectors show that the MAE can be represented as a shift of the psychometric function for motion direction discrimination. Selective attention to the different components of transparent motion altered the susceptibility to adaptation. Shifting attention from one component to the other caused a large shift of the psychometric curves, about 70-75% of the shift measured for the separate components of the transparent adapting stimulus. We conclude that attention can differentiate between spatially superimposed motion vectors and that attention modulates the activity of motion mechanisms before or at the level where adaptation gives rise to MAEs. The results are discussed in light of the role of attention in visual perception and the physiological site for attentional modulation of MAEs.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1997

Linear motion aftereffect induced by pure relative motion.

The effect of adaptation to pure relative motion was investigated for the motion aftereffect (MAE) of linear translation motion. In experiment 1, MAE induced by adaptation in the surrounding area was tested. The relative motion signal significantly increased the magnitude of MAE while local MAE in the surrounds was not affected. In experiment 2, MAE observed in the same adapted area was examined while local adaptation was cancelled out. Substantial MAE was found only when the test stimuli included the surroundings, which is considered to be favourable for relative motion mechanisms. These results clearly indicate that MAE is induced by adaptation to pure relative motion as well as by local motion. MAE should be regarded as a composite phenomenon reflecting multiple sites of adaptation including the local and the relative motion levels. The results also provide evidence for the existence of independent detecting mechanisms for relative motion processing.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1991

Spatial-contrast movement aftereffect can be rotary: support for link with aftereffect of induced movement.

The procedure for eliciting movement aftereffect (MAE) involves the subject's adapting to visual movement that subsequently stops. Conventionally, MAE is confined to the area of movement adaptation. However, Wohlgemuth (1911) demonstrated the existence of a type of MAE that had the opposite characteristics of an adjoining conventional MAE; the test area was unpatterned during adaptation and patterned during testing. This spatial-contrast MAE may be connected with the more recently identified induced movement MAE. Unfortunately, the eliciting movements have not necessarily been comparable; Wohlgemuth used centrifugal and centripetal movement, whereas induced movement MAE has generally been rotary. The results of this study indicate that rotary spatial-contrast MAE can be elicited by a display that, with modification, also elicits induced movement MAE and that the rotary spatial-contrast MAE is weaker than the equivalent induced movement MAE.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Spatial-frequency-contingent color aftereffects: adaptation with one-dimensional stimuli.

The McCollough effect was shown to be spatial-frequency selective by Lovegrove and Over (1972) after adaptation with vertical colored square-wave gratings separated by 1 octave. Adaptation with slide-presented red and green vertical square-wave gratings separated by 1 octave failed to produce contingent color aftereffects (CAEs). However, when each of these gratings was adapted alone, strong CAEs were produced. Adaptation with vertical colored sine-wave gratings separated by 1 octave also failed to produce CAEs, but strong effects were produced by adaptation with each grating alone. By varying the spatial frequency of the test sine wave, CAEs were found to be tuned for spatial frequency at 2.85 octaves after adaptation of 4 cycles per degree (cpd) and at 2.30 octaves after adaptation of 8 cpd. Adaptation of both vertical and horizontal sine-wave gratings produced strong CAEs, with bandwidths ranging from 1.96 to 2.90 octaves and with lower adapting contrast producing weaker CAEs. These results indicate that the McCollough effect is more broadly tuned for spatial frequency than are simple adaptation effects.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1990

A functional theory of the McCollough effect.

Pattern-contingent color aftereffects, or McCollough effects (MEs), are used to probe the visual brain's operations psychophysically. Their neural substrate is unknown, however, and theories about them are weak. Our theory proposes a strong functional role for MEs and a neuropsychological basis that accounts for "top-down" (global) constraints ignored by other theories. The functional aspect of the theory is based on the concept of contingent adaptation level, following Helson (1964), and on the "error-correcting device" of Andrews (1964), which tracks and adjusts internal representation to external-world contingencies. The neuropsychological part of the theory postulates that global properties are the result of MEs being generated not at the individual detector level but in vectorfields of which the detectors are elements. It is an implementation of Lie transformation group theory (Hoffman, 1966). Evidence for this model is assessed.

Brain↗
PubMed1998

Attentional selection of motion states.

In the present experiments the ability of attention to modulate the perceptual dominance in ambiguous motion displays was assessed, as well as the resulting changes of the motion aftereffect (MAE). As ambiguous motion stimuli we used plaids consisting of two differently moving components, where directed attention can select one or the other of the two components. We monitored this selection process during adaptation, and then measured the resulting MAE with static and/or dynamic test stimuli. The results demonstrate that attention increased the dominance of the selected component substantially. This led to an increase in the size of the MAE to the attended component, while the MAE to the not attended component decreased. It was further shown that the attentional MAE effect was relatively short-lasting, only for about the first third of the total MAE. It is concluded that attention can access levels of motion processing that are prior to or at the level of the generation of the component MAEs.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1989

Overprediction and blocking in the McCollough aftereffect.

The Rescorla-Wagner theory (Rescorla & Wagner, 1972) of associative learning offers specific predictions about the associative strength of CS-US pairs when two or more CSs are conditioned to the same US separately and subsequently paired in a compound with the same US. The magnitude of orientation-contingent color aftereffects (AEs) was used as an index of associative strength in this study. The results of experiments using an "overprediction" (Rescorla, 1970) and a "blocking" (Kamin, 1969) paradigm conformed to the predictions of the Rescorla-Wagner theory. In Experiment 1, AEs were established simultaneously for horizontal-vertical and diagonal patterns. When observers subsequently viewed compound induction patterns, AE magnitude was found to be significantly decreased, relative to a condition in which observers did not view such an induction pattern. In Experiment 2, AE magnitude for a given test pattern following inspection of compound induction stimuli was significantly reduced by inspection of the other component prior to viewing the compound induction stimuli. The applicability of associative learning and feature-adaptation models of the McCollough effect is discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Contrast, spatial frequency and test duration effects on the tilt aftereffect: implications for underlying mechanisms.

The tilt aftereffect (TAE) was measured with a forced-choice technique for gratings of different spatial frequencies, contrasts and adapting and test durations. At short test durations, a 2 c/deg grating gave a larger TAE than a 10 c/deg, while at long test durations the opposite occurred. Low contrast gratings tended to give smaller TAEs at short test durations, and larger TAEs at long durations, than high contrast. A longer adapting duration tended to produce larger TAEs at low contrast for any test duration, but larger TAEs at high contrast only at long test durations. We suggest that the spatial frequency effect reflects differential excitation by the test stimuli of transient and sustained channels, and that the contrast effects reflect both a non-linearity in the relationship between excitation and inhibition, and the adapting effects of the test grating.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed2006

Effects of feature-based attention on the motion aftereffect at remote locations.

Previous studies have shown that attention to a particular stimulus feature, such as direction of motion or color, enhances neuronal responses to unattended stimuli sharing that feature. We studied this effect psychophysically by measuring the strength of the motion aftereffect (MAE) induced by an unattended stimulus when attention was directed to one of two overlapping fields of moving dots in a different spatial location. When attention was directed to the same direction of motion as the unattended stimulus, the unattended stimulus induced a stronger MAE than when attention was directed to the opposite direction. Also, when the unattended location contained either uncorrelated motion or had no stimulus at all an MAE was induced in the opposite direction to the attended direction of motion. The strength of the MAE was similar regardless of whether subjects attended to the speed or luminance of the attended dots. These results provide further support for a global feature-based mechanism of attention, and show that the effect spreads across all features of an attended object, and to all locations of visual space.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Independent aftereffects of attention and motion.

In the motion aftereffect (MAE), a stationary pattern appears to move in the opposite direction to previously viewed motion. Here we report an MAE that is observed for a putatively high level of visual analysis-attentive tracking. These high-level MAEs, visible on dynamic (but not static) tests, suggest that attentive tracking does not simply enhance low-level motion signals but, rather, acts at a subsequent stage. MAEs from tracking (1) can overrule competing MAEs from adaptation to low-level motion, (2) can be established opposite to low-level MAEs seen on static tests at the same location, and (3), most striking, are specific to the overall direction of object motion, even at nonadapted locations. These distinctive properties suggest MAEs from attentive tracking can serve as valuable probes for understanding the mechanisms of high-level vision and attention.

Attention↗
PubMed1989

Motion aftereffects and retinal motion.

Two experiments are described in which it was investigated whether the adaptation on which motion aftereffects (MAEs) are based is a response to retinal image motion alone or to the motion signal derived from the process which combines the image motion signal with information about eye movement (corollary discharge). In both experiments observers either fixated a stationary point or tracked a vertically moving point while a pattern (in experiment 1, a grating; in experiment 2, a random-dot pattern) drifted horizontally across the field. In the tracking condition the adapting retinal motion was oblique. In the fixation condition it was horizontal. In every case in both conditions the MAE was horizontal, in the direction opposite to that of pattern motion. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the adaptation is a response to the motion signal derived from the comparison of eye and image motion rather than to retinal motion per se. An alternative explanation is discussed.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed2007

Second-order motion without awareness: passive adaptation to second-order motion produces a motion aftereffect.

Although second-order motion may be detected by early and automatic mechanisms, some models suggest that perceiving second-order motion requires higher-order processes, such as feature or attentive tracking. These types of attentionally mediated mechanisms could explain the motion aftereffect (MAE) perceived in dynamic displays after adapting to second-order motion. Here we tested whether there is a second-order MAE in the absence of attention or awareness. If awareness of motion, mediated by high-level or top-down mechanisms, is necessary for the second-order MAE, then there should be no measurable MAE if the ability to detect directionality is impaired during adaptation. To eliminate the subject's ability to detect directionality of the adapting stimulus, a second-order drifting Gabor was embedded in a dense array of additional crowding Gabors. We found that a significant MAE was perceived even after adaptation to second-order motion in crowded displays that prevented awareness. The results demonstrate that second-order motion can be passively coded in the absence of awareness and without top-down attentional control.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2001

A motion aftereffect seen more strongly by the non-adapted eye: evidence of multistage adaptation in visual motion processing.

We found that the motion aftereffect measured using a directionally ambiguous counterphase grating (flicker MAE) can be stronger when it is measured for the non-adapted eye than when measured for the adapted eye. The monocularly viewed adaptation stimulus was the movement of a missing-fundamental grating (2f+3f motion), for which the movement of the higher-order spatial structure was dominantly perceived, while the first-order structure was physically moving in the opposite direction. For observers who perceived the MAE consistently in the direction opposite to the movement of the higher-order structures, the MAE was larger for the non-adapted eye than for the adapted eye. This finding of 'over-100% transfer' invalidates the standard view that the IOT is a direct measure of the binocularity of the adapted neurones. In addition, the finding provides convincing support for the hypothesis that the flicker MAE reflects adaptation at multiple processing stages

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2006

New binary direction aftereffect does not add up.

Neural adaptation and inhibition are pervasive characteristics of the primate brain and are probably understood better within the context of visual processing than with any other sensory modality. These processes are thought to underlie illusions in which one motion affects the perceived direction of another, such as the direction aftereffect (DAE) and direction repulsion. The DAE describes how, following prolonged viewing of motion in one direction, the direction of a subsequently viewed test pattern is misperceived. In the case of direction repulsion, the direction difference between two transparently moving surfaces is overestimated. Explanations of the DAE appeal to neural adaptation, whereas direction repulsion is accounted for through lateral inhibition. Here, we report on a new illusion, the binary DAE (bDAE), in which superimposed slow and fast dots moving in the same direction are perceived to move in different directions following adaptation to a mixed-speed stimulus. This new phenomenon is essentially a combination of the DAE and direction repulsion. Interestingly, the magnitude of the bDAE is greater than would be expected simply through a linear combination of the DAE and direction repulsion, suggesting that the mechanisms underlying these two phenomena interact in a nonlinear fashion.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1996

Recovery from adaptation for dynamic and static motion aftereffects: evidence for two mechanisms.

The motion aftereffect (MAE) is an illusory drift of a physically stationary pattern induced by prolonged viewing of a moving pattern. Depending on the nature of the test pattern the MAE can be phenomenally different. This difference in appearance has led to the suggestion that different underlying mechanisms may be responsible and several reports show that this might be the case. Here, we tested whether differences in MAE duration obtained with stationary test patterns and dynamic test patterns can be explained by a single underlying mechanism. We find the results support the existence of (at least) two mechanisms. The two mechanisms show different characteristics: the static MAE (i.e. the MAE tested with a static test pattern) is almost completely stored when the static test is preceded by a dynamic test; in contradistinction, the dynamic MAE is not stored when dynamic testing is preceded by a static test pattern.

Adaptation, Ocular↗